This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Those around Kamala Harris have been warned: Not to stand too close.

This comes after the Democrat nominee for president, hand-picked after the party's elite threw Joe Biden under the bus and chose her as a substitute this year, mocked a rally attendee who shouted "Jesus is Lord."

The social media opinion included, "Mock Jesus at you're (sic) own peril," and, "Nobody stand too close to her."

 

Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit headlined a report on the comment, and reaction, "EVIL: Kamala Harris and her supporters mock Christian attendee…"

Harris was promoting America's industry of killing unborn children at the time, saying, "We remember Donald Trump hand-selected three members of the United States Supreme Court with the intention that they would undo the protections of Roe v. Wade and they did as he intended.'

Actually, the Supreme Court ruled that the Roe decision was faulty from its outset and not based on the Constitution, so it was overturned, and the result returned regulation of the abortion industry to states.

The report said the Christian "bravely stood up and proclaimed, 'Jesus is Lord.'"

Only to be mocked by Harris: "I think you're at the wrong rally." She added. "Try the smaller one down the street."

The documentation came from Jennifer McKinney, a Wisconsin resident who attended both the Trump rally in late August and the Harris event.

She explained the "smaller" Trump rally had about 7,000 attending, while Harris had perhaps a reported 2,500.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

WASHINGTON – January 6 political prisoner Ryan Samsel has sounded an alarm via text message from his jail tablet to WorldNetDaily while detained in the general population of the Washington, D.C. Correctional Treatment Facility.

The J6 defendant, who like other "J6ers" has been held in pretrial detention for an extraordinarily long period of time – almost four years – said in a text sent Wednesday that a jail guard took away his mattress while spewing racial epithets. Immediately after this, he asked his family and this reporter to call the jail's command center to investigate the situation.

"Hey can you call LT brown at command center and ask why he took the mattress away and called me a cracker and is mad BC I had ppl call up there for my legal mail they wont give me," Samsel wrote. "He said ant no cracker getting a mattress and took my mattress."

Samsel is also blowing the whistle on what, ironically, could be called an election-fraud scandal of sorts inside the jail.

The law in Washington, D.C. – specifically D.C. Law 23-277, the Restore the Vote Amendment Act of 2020 – "allows District residents to vote while incarcerated."

"I have everyone writing grievance on the jail for not giving us [our] ballots and now [they're] holding my mail," Samsel wrote.

The notorious "D.C. Gulag," in which approximately 300 January 6 defendants have been held pretrial for nearly four years, is the same correctional facility in which Samsel was assaulted by jail guards weeks after his Jan. 30, 2021 arrest, after protesting in the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

Samsel's 2021 beatdown by jail guards resulted in the fracturing of his "orbital floor and potentially untreated brain damage," according to his medical records.

The first assault he sustained while incarcerated for J6 was directed by agents with the FBI following his refusal to take a plea agreement that entailed casting "blame" on former president Donald Trump for his "role" in the Capitol riot.

During another assault at another prison, Samsel explained that he was tied to a 4-point restraint chair and held backwards for approximately 12 hours while being brutally assaulted by jail guards who spat on his face and berated him with profane racial epithets.

Photographs of Samsel locked in a broom closet in a Philadelphia jail went viral across the internet, garnering attention from Gen. Mike Flynn and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, who called the torture of this defendant a "national disgrace."

As Samsel has stated, he was locked in the broom closet for five months with the light left on, after guards discovered he was being smuggled food and coffee through the toilet.

Fellow J6 prisoner, Marine Corps veteran, and Proud Boys leader Zachary Rehl has confirmed that he provided Samsel food, potentially saving his life when Samsel was being starved for nearly two weeks.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Kamala Harris has been promising a lot of people a lot of money, in her campaign to be voted in to the White House next month.

She wants to give a bigger child tax credit, and a cash bonus to first-time homebuyers, and to housing developers.

She wants to raise the inheritance tax, destroying many small businesses, raise taxes on companies, and "rich" people. She's also copied President Donald Trump's plan for not taxing tips.

But exactly where all that money she wants to give away would come from hasn't been clear.

Until now.

In campaign's fundraising email on Wednesday announced a "brass tax."

The email states, "Let's get down to brass tax, Felicia. We've got our final FEC deadline tonight at midnight. It's the last chance we have to show the strength of this movement before Election Day, so I'm asking folks directly to give what they can."

But wait, this doesn't sound like a "tax" proposal, and it's not, it's a solicitation for donations.

The "tax" likely is just a mistake, much like the mistakes that appear in Harris' many word salad answers, and the "mistakes" of Tim Walz when he tries to remember his military career, or his travels, or his family's encounter with IFV, and more.

A U.K. website that explains the sources and meanings of phrases said one possible origin of the "brass tacks" comment is that it might come from the haberdashery trade of years gone past.

"Here the notion is that, in order to be more accurate than the rough-and-ready measuring of a yard of material by holding it out along an arm's length, cloth was measured between brass tacks which were set into a shop's counter. Such simple measuring devices were in use in the late 19th century, as is shown by this piece from Ernest Ingersoll's story 'The Metropolis of the Rocky Mountains, 1880':"

"I hurried over to Seabright's. There was a little square counter, heaped with calicoes and other gear, except a small space clear for measuring, with the yards tacked off with brass tacks."

It added, 'We can rule out links with any form of 'brass tax'. There have been taxes on brass at various times, but no one can find any connection with this phrase. 'Getting down to brass tax' appears to be just a misspelling."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Kamala Harris, writing a book she called "Smart on Crime: A Career Prosecutor's Plan to Make Us Safer" some 15 years ago with co-author Joan O'C. Hamilton, used other people's work as her own, according to a new report.

It is activist Christopher Rufo who has published details on his Substack column explaining she was found to have lifted from other sources, without attribution, a number of sections of the project.

Rufo cited famous Austrian "plagiarism hunter" Stefan Weber in his report on about a dozen fragments that were plagiarized.

The Daily Mail reported, "Weber's report shows that Harris copied verbatim content from Goodwill Industries, her partner on her 'Back on Track' crime program, into the text of her book."

And, the publication asserted, "The report shows that Harris lifted and entire section of text from an Associated Press story published in April 2008 about low graduation rates."

"They not only lifted material from sources without proper attribution, but in at least one case, relied on a low-quality source, which potentially undermined the accuracy of their conclusion," Rufo wrote. The news triggered a response from former President Donald Trump's campaign and running mate Sen. J.D. Vance.

He wrote, "Lmao Kamala didn't even write her own book!"

"Yikes! More evidence that Kamala Harris is a fraud!!!," said Donald Trump Jr.

Plagiarism is a serious charge for a political candidate. After all, one of Joe Biden's earlier presidential bids was derailed by allegations of plagiarism.

The Daily Mail reported that another section of the book quotes sections from a John Jay College of Criminal Justice press release nearly verbatim without attribution.

The report explains Biden's 1987 campaign was brought to a halt after he "appeared to be copying phrases and mannerisms from a British Labour Party politician," the report said.

That followed accusations Biden plagiarized during law school.

"Rufo said that Harris and her publisher should retract the plagiarized passages from her book and issue a correction," the Daily Mail reported.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

JERUSALEM – Mere days after outgoing U.S. President Joe Biden requested Israel tone down its strikes on Hezbollah terrorists in Beirut, Iran's Lebanese proxy launched what is suspected to have been a Russian-made drone, which impacted in Israel's Binyamin region.

At least 67 people are known to have been wounded, and early reports suggest at least 4 or 5 people are in a critical condition and may have been killed.

Two drones were launched, with the Israeli Navy succeeding in taking out one over the sea.

The second, however, which did not set off the incoming alert siren, traveled approximately 25 miles to the south-east of Haifa and impacted at an army base at which new recruits go to train. A Hezbollah source told Al-Jazeera: "We attacked the Binyamina area with a swarm of drones, our capabilities are strong and capable of reaching deep into Israel."

Some 15 people were moderately wounded with many of the remainder lightly hurt in the drone attack. Most were taken to Hillel Yaffe Medical Center in Hadera. Others were taken to Sheba Hospital in Ramat Gan, Rambam Hospital in Haifa, and Rabin Medical Center in Petah Tikva.

Rumors also began to circulate during the night Sunday that IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Herzi Halevi had been assassinated, propagated by X Spaces host Mario Nawfal, who has more than 3 million followers.

However, there has been absolutely no corroborating evidence to suggest this is in any way correct.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Former President Donald Trump is warning of a "bigger problem" than foreign agents potentially causing chaos across America on Election Day.

Maria Bartiromo of Fox News asked the ex-commander-in-chief on her "Sunday Morning Futures" program if he expected chaos on Election Day this Nov. 5.

"No, not from the side that votes for Trump," the Republican presidential nominee responded.

Bartiromo continued: "But I'm just wondering if these outside agitators will start the up on Election Day. Let's say you win. Let's remember, you've got 50,000 Chinese nationals in this country in the last couple of years. There are people on the terrorist watch list, 350 in the last couple of years. Like you said, 13,000 murderers and 15,000 rapists. What are you expecting? Joe Biden said he doesn't think it's going to be a peaceful Election Day."

Trump explained: "Well, he doesn't have any idea what's happening, he spends most of his day sleeping.

"I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within. Not even the people that have come in and are destroying our country. By the way, totally destroying our country, the towns, the villages, they're being inundated.

"But I don't think they're the problem in terms of Election Day. I think the bigger problem are the the people from within.

"We have some very bad people, we have some sick people, radical-left lunatics, and I think they're … and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard or, if really necessary, by the military. Because they can't let that happen."

Trump specifically named U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., as one of the enemies within, calling him a "lunatic" and "sleazebag."

"The thing that that's tougher to handle are these lunatics that we have inside like Adam Schiff. Think of it, this guy's going to be a senator. He's running against a guy that doesn't understand politics at all, [former Los Angeles Dodger Steve] Garvey, but he was a good baseball player. But he doesn't understand politics at all. Adam shifty Schiff, who's a total sleazebag, is going to become a senator. But I call him the enemy from within.

"When you look at the danger he put our country in potentially with Russia with a phony, made-up deal that he made up with Hillary [Clinton], that started off as an excuse for why she lost an election that a lot of people thought she should have won. The polls indicated she might win, and then she got beaten everywhere, virtually. When you look at that, they said it was Russia, they used it as an excuse. And then the fake news picked it up."

Continuing on the subject of fake news, Trump hammered CBS News and "60 Minutes" for its recent deceptive editing of its interview with 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris.

"Let's talk about the single greatest scandal, in my opinion, in broadcast history," Trump said.

"'60 Minutes' and CBS interviewed Kamala, and she's incompetent. She gave them the dumbest answer anyone's ever heard. So they took that answer out, the whole answer they threw out, and they took another answer that she gave to a totally different question and inserted it. And supposedly, they did this a number of times. And they got caught. '60 Minutes' and CBS should lose their license for that."

Trump also slammed the response of the Biden-Harris administration response to recent disasters including Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton.

"A lot of governors have done a good job. But the response from the White House has been absolutely terrible. Her response has been terrible," Trump indicated.

He also voiced his opinion that the current administration used money from FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and gave it to illegal immigrants.

"That group has no idea what's happening," Trump said. "Look, it's the worst president and the worst vice president in the history of our country. They're horrible. And he can't stand her for one simple reason. She overthrew him. But she didn't do it, the party did. Call it the Deep State, whatever it is, but the party did it. And it was really a coup. I mean, he is a very angry guy."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

It's not that CBS had a firm grasp on a reputation for impartiality or neutrality anyway.

For instance, it recently colluded with the Kamala Harris campaign in what some have described as election interference to change her answer to an interview question:

But it's now gone further at the network, with the apparent establishment of a bureau that runs stories past a "racial ideology" agenda before allowing them on the air.

According to a report at Revolver.news, "What if we told you that a so-called 'trusted' news source in the United States—the land of the 'free press'—is now running their story ideas through a radical left-wing ideology department that has the power to approve or disapprove of what airs on American televisions and across the internet?"

But that's what's happening, the report said.

"According to a new report, CBS must now get the 'okay' from a radical new department before any of their stories ever make it to air or print," the report said.

"Incredibly, that department, which OF COURSE was created in the wake of George Floyd's overdose and heart attack death, is called the 'Race and Culture Unit.' You may be curious: what exactly happens if a CBS News employee runs afoul of the 'Race and Culture Unit'? Apparently, the answer is a company-wide, hilarious struggle session."

The story line then turned to Puck News, which explained the fight erupted over a recent CBS interview with author Ta-Nehisi Coates, and how executives were out of sorts because the interview allegedly "failed to meet the network's editorial standards."

The report said what had happened was that CBS News officials delivered that conclusion based on co-anchor Tony Dokoupil's "interrogative on-air scrutiny of Coates" and his new book.

The report confirmed, "Dokoupil kicked things off by noting that The Message offered a one-sided account of the Israel-Palestine conflict that, absent Coates's name and reputation and an American publisher, wouldn't have been out of place in an extremist's backpack. Dokoupil eventually cooled his heels and focused on some serious and significant shortcomings of the book. In particular, he keyed in on Coates's surprising decision not to include certain critical pieces of historical context, including, for instance, the First Intifada, the Second Intifada, and various terrorist attacks.

"Surprised, but seemingly game, Coates blithely pivoted away from these concerns and put forward a passionate but historically shallow view that appeared to offer little room for the Jews' multi-thousand-year history of global persecution in his argumentative framework. He made clear that his sympathies lay with the Palestinians, and drew parallels with his own experience in post-Jim Crow America. "

It was, in short, "two smart guys actively disagreeing with one another," the report said.

But within 24 hours, dozens of network workers objected to Dokoupil's questions and some so-called journalism groups signaled their dissatisfaction. There were charges and countercharges.

So the fight went to the network's administration, which said those questions were not run through its "Race and Culture" and "Standards and Practices" ideologies.

Dokoupil is Jewish and some said he actually upheld journalistic values by asking tough questions. But the fireworks already were lit, and the CBS staff split.

Then the "60 Minutes" interview scandal hit, the report said.

Revolver noted, "Putting aside the hilarity of it all, it's downright Orwellian that CBS is running all of its content through a new regime-inspired racial 'Ministry of Truth,' undoubtedly manned by hardcore Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion commissars."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The American economies under President Donald Trump, and then under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, have been put on a scale side-by-side, and a report from the Washington Examiner suggests there's a clear winner.

"It's difficult to compare the Trump and Biden economic track records because of the unique circumstances created by the pandemic. But it appears that, on balance, voters do not hold Trump responsible for the hardships created by the COVID-19 shutdowns — but they do blame Biden for the high inflation of the past few years," the report said.

The report explained, "For much of Biden's presidency, consumer sentiment was as bad as it was during the worst days of the Great Recession following the 2008 financial crisis, according to the University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers. Over the course of his tenure, the sentiment index has averaged just under 81%. By comparison, it averaged nearly 93% under former President Donald Trump — even though Trump presided over the pandemic recession. Now, it's no mystery why the public isn't happy about the economy or Biden's record: Prices have risen 20% since he came into office. The spike in inflation on his watch will define his economic legacy."

In fact, one assessment of the American economy by independent economists suggested the real inflation under Biden-Harris has been 25%. And Harris, now the Democrat nominee for president, has confirmed she can think of nothing she would have done differently from Biden, and would continue his policies.

First, there have been some positive notes out of the Biden-Harris regime, the report said, although the numbers are impacted by the COVID catastrophe, the China-born virus that decimated the economy at the end of Trump's term, allowing job recovery to make its mark during Biden's.

Average annual real gross domestic product growth was 1.85% under Trump; 3.24% under Biden-Harris.

Jobs lost under Trump totaled 2.7 million, the effect of the pandemic; growth under Biden was 15.8 million.

But outside of those two categories, there's little good news for Biden.

Real per capita disposable income growth was 24% under Trump; minus 4.4% under Biden.

The S&P 500 was up 65% under Trump, 48% under Biden.

Inflation, measured by the CPI, was 7.7% under Trump, 19.9% under Biden.

Grocery prices were up 6.5% under Trump; 21% under Biden.

The price of gasoline was $2.41 under Trump; $3.37 under Biden.

Housing costs rose 11.5% under Trump; 23% under Biden.

Mortgage rates were 3.9% under Trump; 5.4% under Biden.

The report noted the pandemic was "a big part" of the GDP assessment.

Excluding the pandemic years gives Trump a GDP rate of 2.82%, while Biden's would be 2.26%.

And regarding job creation, "The job losses during the Trump era were largely temporary separations caused by pandemic disruptions. Similarly, much of the job growth during Biden's tenure was simply people rejoining their employers as the economy began reopening," the report said.

One way of balancing the assessments, the report is to look at the total employment rate.

"Before COVID-19, the employment rate rose throughout Trump's term, which is probably a major factor in voters' positive memories of that time. The employment-to-population ratio hit 61.1% in February 2020, on the eve of the pandemic, the highest such rate since the 2008 financial crisis. Under Biden, the ratio has come close but never regained that level, maxing out at 60.4% in November of last year," the report said.

On inflation, the report said, "The bottom line is that it appears that, pandemic aside, inflation-adjusted income growth was strong under Trump and has also been strong under Biden — but some people have been left behind as prices have soared."

It added, "To sum up, then: By this measure [of disposable income], households did very well in the Trump years and then found themselves surprisingly flush during the pandemic. The stimulus-induced highs of the COVID era waned under Biden, but the trend has otherwise been almost exactly the same as it was under Trump, even accounting for inflation."

And it explained, "Prices were much more stable under Trump than Biden. This is probably the factor that has hurt Democrats more than anything."

While inflation has receded under Biden, "But families and voters don't care about the rate of inflation in a given month. They care about the fact that they're paying more at the grocery store and gas pump and that the costs of some big-ticket items, such as houses and cars, have soared during the time Biden has been in office."

And Biden's green agenda has pushed energy prices overall up nearly 30%, to the 2.3% increase under Trump.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The Joe Biden-Kamala Harris administration, which is seeking through Harris' 2024 campaign to continue its leftist agendas for another four years and trillions of dollars, knew that the botched withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan would result in the deaths of Afghan allies, and deliberately abandoned them, a new report confirms.

It was the American Center for Law and Justice that pursued a Freedom of Information Act case against the government.

The organization pointed out that so far no one has been held accountable for the Afghanistan disaster created on the orders of the Biden-Harris administration, so it sought access to information about that decision-making process.

The results of the lawsuit included a number of documents, mostly redacted. But the ACLJ it found a copy a "summons" from Taliban terrorists that apparently was intended for, and delivered to, some of those who helped the U.S.

Translated from Arabic, it states: "This is a summons from the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan for Sayed Paida Gol Hashimi, Sayyid Hazargul Hashimi, and Hablulmatin Hashimi. Based on the accurate information of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, you all had worked very closely with the occupying forces of the United States – the American anti-Islamic forces in Bamyan province in recent years. Therefore, you are ordered to submit yourself to the nearest field office of the Islamic Emirate where you will be served to face justice within the legal framework of the Islamic Emirate. Your failure to surrender yourself will have serious consequences both to you and your family as all of you including your families will be severely prosecuted and punished under the Islamic law of the Emirate."

The ACLJ reported, "The summons above illustrates the retribution inevitably faced by the Afghan allies we deserted. The Hashimis, like so many of our other Afghan allies, were essential in helping the United States during its time in Afghanistan. No doubt numerous families like the Hashimis were sent similarly threatening letters and required to turn themselves in to 'face justice within the legal framework of the Islamic Emirate.'"

It continued, "Make no mistake, this would mean subjecting themselves to Shariah law. Remember that there is no innocence until proven guilty and not necessarily even a right to due process or a trial. It appears that the mind of the Taliban was already made up, and under Shariah law, the penalty is often death."

"The fact that the State Department has this summons means that they knew, and we know they did nothing," the ACLJ said.

The ACLJ cited a report dating to 2022 that confirms at least 242 reports of "reprisal killings" in Afghanistan after Biden and Harris withdrew American troops in a series of events that resulted in the terror-triggered deaths of 13 service members.

"Note also that a refusal of the Hashimis to surrender themselves to death meant that consequences would also be felt by their families," the ACLJ said. "This could mean the ending of multiple generations of Hashimis solely for their willingness to cooperate with U.S. troops."

The report said, "All this punishment is due to the United States promising to protect our allies and then abandoning them when it was most convenient. It is inexcusable that our own government officials and our media have proven so willing to obfuscate the abject failures of the Biden-Harris administration in Afghanistan – despite knowing the many resulting disastrous outcomes."

The ACLJ pointed out that "summons" is dated only six days after the last U.S. troops left.

"The Taliban was already issuing legal threats to our allies before the jet trail of our military aircraft still lingered over," the report said.

Further, it noted that after the pullout, "at least 600 Americans were abandoned for months behind enemy lines. Yet the Biden-Harris administration publicly stated it did not know how many Americans were left behind and admitted there were no plans to help Americans get out of Afghanistan."

And there were "tens of thousands" of Afghan citizens who had helped the U.S., only to be "left behind to deal with a vengeful Taliban."

"Furthermore, billions of dollars of advanced U.S. military equipment were also captured and still remain in the hands of the Taliban terrorists."

Actually, some of that military gear now has been found in other terror-infested locations around the world. with the Taliban apparently selling off some of the excess vehicles, helicopters, planes and more that it does not need.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

An investigation into allegations of corruption in the Democrats' fundraising industry across America now is expanding to 19 states, according to a report from Just the News.

WND reported weeks ago that an investigation had been launched into the activities of ActBlue, the billion-dollar fundraising industry that exists to pay for the Democrats' agenda in America.

It boasts of having raised $14 billion for Democrats since 2004.

Earlier, it was the Post-Millennial that explained the attorney general for the state of Virginia is reviewing allegations the Democrat money machine "has thousands of donations registered under stolen identities and names."

Now the report from Just the News explains the review of the fundraising schemes is expanding into 19 states.

Attorneys general from across the nation are demanding the company answer questions about security practices and more.

Among the issues involved are whether Democrats are using ActBlue to launder foreign money or create donations in people's names without their permission, a scheme known as "straw donations."

A letter from multiple state attorneys general informed ActBlue chief Regina Wallace-Jones about security issues with the platform that "could be allowing donations made in people's names who didn't donate."

Their letter warned, "Recent reporting suggests that that [sic] there may be donors across the country who are identified in filings with the Federal Election Commission as having donated to candidates through ActBlue (and other affiliated entities), but who did not actually make those donations."

The result is "a host of concerns about whether ActBlue's platform is being used to facilitate 'smurfing' – a type of money laundering in which donors break up large donations and submit them under different names to disguise who the money comes from and thereby skirt contribution limits in violation of state and federal law."

The evidence of nefarious actions isn't hard to find, the letter explained, as "Independent investigations have shown that there are donors across the country who show up on FEC filings as having donated to candidates through ActBlue (and other affiliated entities) but deny having made those donations."

The state legal officers explained they have concerns "about where those dollars came from."

ActBlue officials have claimed there is no wrongdoing, and they are cooperating.

But the attorneys' general point out the issues involve both civil and criminal offenses.

"Just the News has confirmed some Americans who believe their names have been misused to make donations for others are contemplating a private lawsuit while Congress is trying to determine whether federally regulating financial institutions have reported any suspicious transactions flowing through ActBlue's platform or its clients," the report said.

Officials from Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming backed the concerns originally raised by officials from Iowa and Indiana.

The fundraising behemoth claimed in a statement it "rigorously" protects donor information and works to prevent fraud

House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil, R-Wis., already has raised specific concerns with authorities in at least five states.

Steil explained an analysis done by his committee uncovered a suspicious pattern of donations from individuals with net worths too small to donate what has been credited to them via ActBlue reports to the Federal Election Commission.

For example, some people reported as unemployed have "donated" to Democrats sums totaling six digits.

Steil said, "The real big concern here is that because these donations are made online, they could be coming from anywhere across the globe. Gone are the days where individuals would engage in illegal behavior with cash. Now we can do this online."

Earlier, commentator and personality Charlie Kirk said online, that "It's trivially easy to find massive, repeated donations to ActBlue that use stolen identities and, quite possibly, stolen credit cards."

At issue then was a 79-year-old resident living in an apartment at $2,000 a month was "recorded" as having made 22,619 separate donations since 2019.

Totaling more than $800,000.

Kirk, founder of TPUSA, said that "donor," "obviously (is) being exploited for some kind of money-laundering operation."

He called for action to investigate and prosecute as needed.

Patriot News Alerts delivers timely news and analysis on U.S. politics, government, and current events, helping readers stay informed with clear reporting and principled commentary.
© 2026 - Patriot News Alerts