This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
One of the many lawfare campaigns against President Donald Trump launched by his enemies in the Democrat party is one claiming he illegally kept government documents when he left office.
And had them in his Mar-a-Lago home which was targeted in a SWAT raid authorized by his 2024 presidential campaign opponent, Joe Biden.
Now a lawsuit has been filed against the federal government because officials have failed to respond to a request for access to documents that could confirm those papers actually were under Trump's control, and he had the right to them.
The fight is profiled in the Washington Examiner, which explained America First Legal has sued the Defense Department over access to "an Obama-era memo that may reveal pertinent information" about those documents.
The organization already had filed a Freedom of Information Act request for information on a "secretive" technology committee created in 2014 to address cybersecurity.
The legal team says the Presidential Information Technology Committee establishes a presumption "that the president controls all information he receives."
Leftists in Biden's administration have launched dozens of counts in a court case against Trump for documents allegedly found in his home.
The legal team explains the government "has violated the FOIA by failing to reasonably search for records responsive to AFL’s FOIA request and release nonexempt records within the prescribed time limit."
Cited is a March 2015 publication of a statement from Obama that established the president's "exclusive control" over information resources provided to the president, the vice president, and the Executive Office of the President.
Trump's defense has included that under the Presidential Records Act, he had broad authority to designate documents from his time in office as personal property.
The government, in its lawfare case against Trump, claimed Trump wasn't authorized to have those documents, but the legal team says the Obama rule could be read to provide that permission.
Further, the case points out that the government may have, in fact, originals of at least some of the disputed documents, making those Trump held nothing more than "mere copies."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Most people, if not all, could see it as reasonable to describe someone who barbarically attacks and murders a college coed as an animal, and that's what President Trump has done.
However, by the time the campaign of Democrat Joe Biden got through editing a clip of Trump, they had him calling "immigrants" "animals."
The situation developed after Trump spoke at a Michigan rally Tuesday, promising to ensure justice for the "animal" that killed Riley, a suspect who is an illegal alien.
A report in the Post Millennial explained what happened.
"The Biden campaign cut up the clip, out of context, and spread it across social media with a caption quoting the former president, saying 'Trump: Democrats said please don’t call immigrants animals. I said, no, they’re not humans, they’re animals.'"
The report explained, "Trump said Riley was murdered by an 'illegal alien animal' right before the segment was clipped, out of context, by the Biden campaign."
He said, "The 22-year-old nursing student in Georgia was barbarically murdered by an illegal alien animal. The Democrats say, 'Please don’t call them animals, they’re humans,' I said, 'No they’re not humans, they’re not humans, they’re animals.'"
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
One of the scandals involving Joe Biden and his family, among many that remain under investigation or prosecution, is a series of counts pending against First Son Hunter Biden for his alleged failure to pay income taxes on millions of dollars in cash.
His lawyers submitted eight motions to U.S. District Court Judge Mark Scarsi to have them dismissed but failed to include one key component: Evidence.
It is a constitutional expert and famed law professor Jonathan Turley who commented online on the development.
He described Scarsi's decision as a "stinging rebuke" to Hunter Biden and his lawyers.
"Hunter Biden has been arguing that he is the victim of selective prosecution despite a documented history of receiving special treatment as the son of the president," he explained. "However, he has proven a key witness against himself in swatting down defenses raised by his counsel and publishing self-incriminating facts in his book."
He cited the history of the tax case, in which the Biden Department of Justice "not only allowed the statute of limitations to run on major crimes but sought to finalize an obscene plea agreement with no jail time for Hunter."
That fell apart when a judge questioned its leniency.
Turley explained the lack of additional charges against Hunter Biden is in stark contrast to another case now pending against Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J.
"Rather than the four original counts, Menendez now faces 18 counts with his wife, Nadine Arslanian Menendez, and alleged co-conspirators Wael Hana and Fred Daibes" he explained. "What is most notable is not the proliferation of counts but the lack of comparative charges in the pending case against Hunter Biden. Some of us have long raised concerns over the striking similarity in the alleged conduct in both cases, but the absence of similar charges against the president’s son."
Scarsi's ruling said, "As the court stated at the hearing, the defendant filed his motion without any evidence. The motion is remarkable in that it fails to include a single declaration, exhibit, or request for judicial notice. Instead, the defendant cites portions of various Internet news sources, social media posts, and legal blogs. These citations, however, are not evidence."
Hunter Biden's lawyers claimed the handling of the case was "abnormal."
"In truth, the 'abnormal' treatment of Hunter was giving him advance notice of attempts to interview him and to search for Biden's property. It was allowing the statute of limitations to run despite having an agreement on the table to keep potential felonies alive. It was trying to secure a plea agreement that even the prosecutor admitted in court was like nothing he had ever seen in his career," Turley noted.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
UPDATE: The missile attack on Damascus, Syria, has reportedly killed a top Iranian general.
The Jerusalem Post reports:
Mohammed Reza Zahedi, the top commander in the Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) for Lebanon and Syria was assassinated in an air strike on Monday.
Zahedi is the highest-ranking Iranian killed since the current war started, even higher than Sayyed Reza Mousavi, who was killed in December, The Jerusalem Post has learned.
Besides his wide-ranging responsibilities for terror on Israel's borders, he was the highest-level interlocutor for Tehran with Hezbollah.
This means that although Israel has not taken credit, Iran and Hezbollah are already accusing Jerusalem of involvement since removing Zahedi could be seen as a blow to the management of the Lebanese terror groups' rocket attacks on Israel.
A report from state media outlets in Syria on Monday said there was an Israeli strike on Damascus, on the neighborhood containing the Iranian embassy.
The state agency, SANA, said in the bull's-eye was a building in the Mazzeh neighborhood, which is the location of the Iranian embassy.
Social media reports, not confirmed immediately, said the strike was near the Iranian embassy.
Press TV, one outlet for the Iranian government's official statements, shared on social media that a building "near" the embassy was attacked.
It's not the first broadside launched against various Iranian interests since the start of the war triggered by the terrorists in Hamas, who invaded Israel on October 7 and butchered some 1,200 Israeli civilians.
Israel has responded with a military campaign to wipe out the terror threat, coming from the Hamas-controlled Gaza.
One online report said the Monday attack was on a villa near the Iranian embassy, a facility used by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
The China Daily had reported that two civilians were hurt in an attack in Damascus Sunday night, and the Syrian Defense Ministry blamed it was Israel.
The report also said Israel targeted the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights in Damascus.
The report said there have been dozens of such attacks over the past few months, including an attack on a military site in Syria's northern city of Aleppo last week that reportedly killed multiple members of the military there.
Statements from Hezbollah and Syria's government-run media said dead were dozens of Syrian soldiers and members of Hezbollah.
Israel rarely comments on its actions, when they are launched. But it has acknowledged that it has conducted strikes targeting Hezbollah.
Reuters reported the Friday attack left 39 dead.
One report noted Maj. Gen. Ori Gordin, chief of Israel's Northern Command, revealed, "We continue to strike against Hezbollah, determined to push it back and destroy its infrastructure."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Reggie Walton, a sitting federal judge who has heard January 6 cases involving supporters of President Donald Trump and often has thrown the book at defendants, has lashed out publicly at Trump for his criticism of another judge, this one hearing a Trump case, who may be compromised by his daughter's partisan agenda.
Walton granted an interview to CNN and repeatedly bashed Trump, who has been targeted by multiple Democrat lawfare cases, including a contrived "hush money" case being heard by Judge Juan Merchan.
It is Merchan whose daughter has represented, in her job, "Crooked Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Adam 'Shifty' Schiff, and other Radical Liberals," Trump, who asked Merchan to recuse himself, has charged.
Merchan refused.
The Gateway Pundit noted, "An X account allegedly belonging to Loren Merchan (it hasn’t been confirmed to be her account) posted a photo of Trump behind bars. The photo has since been changed to a picture of Kamala Harris."
Trump has pointed out the obvious conflict between Merchan hearing allegations from Democrat prosecutors about Trump's alleged "hush money" case, and the potential influence of his daughter's political activism.
The Pundit described Walton's decision to grant CNN an interview as "An appalling violation of the code of ethics."
He said, "I think it’s important in order to preserve our democracy that we maintain the rule of law…I think it’s important that we judges speak out..."
Walton said, of Trump's defense against claims Merchan, who has issued a gag order against Trump, is hearing, "It’s very disconcerting to have someone making comments about a judge, and it’s particularly problematic when those comments are in the form of a threat, especially if they’re directed at one’s family. We do these jobs because we’re committed to the rule of law and we believe in the rule of law, and the rule of law can only function effectively when we have judges who are prepared to carry out their duties without the threat of potential physical harm."
The Washington Examiner called Walton's decision to lash out as "an extraordinary move."
"Walton’s interview was particularly unusual because Trump is also facing criminal charges in Washington, Walton’s district, and Walton has overseen cases related to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot that have parallels to Trump’s case there," the Examiner explained.
Mike Howell of the Heritage Foundation said his team already is reviewing "how these unprecedented partisan comments on a partisan network impact our cases before Judge Reggie Walton."
And Mike Davis, of the Article III Project, told the Examiner Walton's interview was "extremely inappropriate" and there would be a complaint filed over the "misconduct."
"Is this a (bad) joke? This is a sitting federal judge. And he’s commenting on a pending criminal case? Against the leading presidential candidate? During the heigh of the election season? If so, this is highly prejudicial," Davis said.
William Shipley, a lawyer who defended January 6 defendants, told the Examiner, "This is a problem."
While Walton complained about potential threats to judges and family members, the report pointedly noted that Walton has called Trump a "charlatan."
He also said, "I’ve made the comments I’ve made in the context of the sentences I impose because I’m hoping that what I say to the individuals who I’m sentencing will resonate with them and cause them to rethink the activity that they engaged in that brought them before the court and hopefully deter them from engaging in further conduct of that nature in the future."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The judiciary contingent that has aligned itself in a series of cases against President Donald Trump and other Americans is being blasted for violating, over and over, the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines.
The condemnation comes from Lawrence Kadish, who serves on the board of governors of The Gatestone Institute.
"It is high time," he said, "to call on all judges and patriots to put a stop to crimes committed by those who have been elected or appointed to uphold the laws of the nation and the U.S. Constitution, but who instead have been violating the law and assaulting the Constitution – sadly with impunity."
There have been several examples of egregious federal decisions, such as the determination not to charge when ex-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton allegedly obstructed justice by reportedly ordering her staff to destroy 33,000 subpoenaed emails with BleachBit and smash two of her 13 BlackBerry mobile devices, he said.
Then, too, he said, Joe Biden has intentionally defied the Supreme Court's ruling that he was not authorized to make taxpayers pay some $138 billion that was loaned to college students.
First Amendment violations abound in the government, he said, citing the orchestrated efforts by the FBI and others to "quash the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop."
Or "calling true medical information false during the COVID-19 pandemic."
But now the Eighth Amendment has been in the bull's eye, he explained.
First, there has been "governmental abuse of power, astronomically out of control" against those who "supposedly walked through 'the people's house'" on January 6, 2021.
And just as bad are the violations by "district attorneys and at least one judge" in a series of attacks on President Donald Trump, he said.
"We have seen N.Y. Attorney General Letitia James campaigning for election on a platform of 'get Trump' -- for what was never even mentioned," he noted. "It is the same process used by Stalin's head of the Soviet secret police (NKVD), Lavrentiy Beria, who reportedly said, 'Show me the man and I'll show you the crime.'"
"At present, we are seeing laws being contorted so that one person, former President Donald J, Trump, is being prosecuted for a supposed crime in which no estimates were misrepresented without a clause insisting that the other parties to the contract (here, sophisticated banks) verify the estimates for themselves. No one was defrauded. No one ever even complained of being defrauded or wronged. No one lost a dime. One bank even testified that as a client, Trump was a 'whale,' with whom it would like to do more business. Everyone in this kangaroo trial of alleged criminal fraud said that they had done colossally well from it," he documented. "Yet, a fine of half a billion dollars was imposed, which had to be paid before Trump could even appear before another judge to appeal his case…
"Fortunately, on the morning of the forfeiture, the bond was reduced from half a billion dollars to 'only' $175 million -- which is also, under these fanciful circumstances, an insane amount to commit simply to be able to be heard by a court," he said.
He said so far, "Too many people are being deeply wronged. It is to be hoped that in a few months, for the sake of public confidence in free and fair elections, our Republic, and our Constitution, these injustices and others like them, will be set right."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Stephen Breyer, who sat on the U.S. Supreme Court for nearly three decades before resigning in 2022, has written a book, like so many others who come out of the Washington, D.C., swamp, and is on a tour promoting it.
As part of those interviews, he's lashed out at the rest of the court for overturning the faulty and unconstitutional Roe v. Wade decision that created a "right" to abortion, and also promoted his personal ideology of a changeable U.S. Constitution.
And he's getting blasted, in a house editorial at the Washington Examiner, for his warping of the nation's foundation document.
"The learned justice says his method of judging is needed as a model for successors because 'the world does change,' so if the court doesn’t interpret the Constitution as evolvable, too, 'we will have a Constitution that no one wants.' Therefore, he says repeatedly, his method 'involves purposes, consequences, values, and sometimes much more.'
"This sounds high-minded and reasonable, but it is bunk. Even worse, it is a power grab subject to no limiting principle, especially when he goes into an open-ended 'much more' phase. Breyer treats as paramount the jurist’s subjective assessment of 'values and sometimes much more,' as if he possesses Olympian wisdom about such matter above that of mere mortals. This would turn representative democracy into an elitist oligarchy, a rule by nine supposedly wise men and women, against America’s constitutional design that deliberately separates, disperses, and blends power in multitudinous ways intended to safeguard liberty."
Breyer quit the court at a time when Joe Biden was able to push Ketanji Jackson, a far-left ideologue adored by leftists, onto the bench.
The Examiner noted that Breyer's comments suggest he basically puts judges "above the law."
Breyer's writings claim to make a case for using "pragmatism," or adjusting the Constitution to circumstances, rather than reading it as it was originally written.
"What Breyer’s suggestion amounts to is the anti-democratic idea that judges should be free to twist what the law says to suit their own prejudices — that is, they should be above the law rather than servants of it."
The piece explained what America's founders set up: "In a republic, applying 'values' and trying to create the right 'consequences' is the job not of judges but of the people’s elected representatives, or of the people themselves. The Constitution, as fundamental law enacted by the people, is supreme. Statutes written via representative procedures are next. The reason judges, ultimately Supreme Court justices, are final arbiters of what the law means is not because they possess superior moral or value-based perspicacity, but because they are supposed to be the most learned in parsing the words of laws to ensure they are applied faithfully. Jurists are supposed to be guided and humbly governed by the words of the law, not by willful masters over them."
It continued, "Breyer’s 'pragmatism' … invites the mischief of judicial willfulness, unmoored from objective restraints, applied by nine people acting as philosopher kings."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Hunter Biden's former business partner, Tony Bobulinski, was a key congressional witness in the House investigation into whether Joe Biden committed crimes for which he should face impeachment. Now he has filed a $30 million defamation action against Fox News entertainer Jessica Tarlov.
Bobulinski's testimony has confirmed that Joe Biden indeed did participate in his son Hunter's influence-peddling scheme through which Biden family members gained tens of millions of dollars.
Bobulinski, on Thursday, released a statement, "Today I filed a lawsuit against Ms. Jessica Tarlov of Fox News for defamation. Although I am seeking compensatory, special, and punitive damages from her for the damage her public remarks inflicted on my personal and professional reputation, this is not about money. This is about the truth, for which I have been fighting for four years."
He continued, "It is important for media personalities like Ms. Tarlov to understand that lies have consequences. I have consistently told the truth to the American people about the deep corruption of the Biden family and will continue to do so, and I have paid my legal expenses arising from my decision to come forward out of my own pocket. I will donate every penny I may be awarded in this suit to a children’s hospital and to support our military Veterans. Ms. Tarlov refused to apologize and sincerely correct the record. I look forward to holding her accountable in a court of law and to continuing to bring the truth to the American people."
The complaint shows the case was filed in federal court in the Southern District of New York and charges Tarlov, on Fox News, "lied" about Bobulinski and Stefan Passantino, saying that Mr. Bobulinski's legal fees are being paid by a "Trump Super PAC as recently as January 2024."
The comment came as Tarlov was talking about Bobulinski's appearance before the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
"Tarlov lied to achieve media headlines and ratings and to serve her political agenda by deliberately besmirching the character of Messrs. Bobulinski and Passantino," the complaint charges.
"The assertion was unequivocally false and defamatory, and plaintiffs demanded a complete retraction and apology," it states. But Tarlov "petulantly" did not.
He confirms in the court filing that he worked with Hunter Biden and was witness to a partnership between the "Chinese Communist Party/Chairman Ye through their surrogate, China Energy Company Limited, a CCP-linked Chinese energy conglomerate, and the Biden family."
The filing states, "Bobulinski confirmed that he saw, firsthand, that Hunter Biden would frequently go to his father for his approval or advice for various business deals."
It was just days ago that he appeared to testify before Congress, accompanied by his lawyer, Passantino.
After that hearing, Tarlov said, "Tony Bobulinski's lawyers' fees have been paid by a Trump Super PAC. That's as recent as January."
The filing says she later "clarified" that she has "seen no indication" that PAC payments were made "in connection to Mr. Bobulinski's legal fees."
"Tarlov was aware at the time she made them that these false statements invoking President Trump would inflame a segment of the country against Mr. Bobulinski and Mr. Passantino and would falsely cause her viewers to disbelieve Mr. Bobulinski's sworn testimony," the filing charges.
Tarlov is accused of having "a well-established pattern of hostile and malicious intent to defame the character and reputation of anyone associated with President Trump."
And it reveals Bobulinski has paid all of his own legal fees.
The case seeks $30 million in compensatory, special and punitive damages, plus costs.
Fox told WND, "Jessica Tarlov’s March 21st statements were accurate and made clear that she was not aware of anything to indicate that payments from a Trump PAC to Elections, LLC were made in connection with Tony Bobulinski’s legal fees. We stand by our decision to not issue any further corrections and will vigorously defend against these inaccurate claims."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Disney is dropping its lawsuits against Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, apparently giving up its fight against his decision to pull the massive corporation's special status as its government that was granted to the Magic Kingdom years ago.
The fight over Disney's authority to run the Reedy Creek Improvement District, which essentially made it its government, erupted because the company attacked the state for trying to protect children in schools from the influences of an LGBT ideology.
Disney officials repeatedly blasted the state for what critics, inaccurately, have called a new "Don't Say Gay" law that doesn't say that. It just, as its name states, provides "Parental Rights in Education."
The state of Florida responded to the attack by canceling Disney's Reedy Creek authorities and replacing it with a new state board to govern the district, putting Disney on the same level as other companies in Florida.
Now a report from the Daily Mail reveals Disney is dropping its legal actions opposing DeSantis' moves.
The report called the decision "a major win" for the new board overseeing the land of Disney.
"The settlement agreement on Wednesday includes Disney acknowledging eleventh-hour deals it made with the outgoing Reedy Creek Improvement District are now null and void," the report said.
At the time the new state district was being created, Disney reached special deals with the old Reedy Creek board, which it controlled, to take over a long list of governmental functions under the new board.
The report noted, "Walt Disney Co. made these last-ditch efforts in an attempt to solidify property rights and grant the theme park additional powers as DeSantis appointed a new board to oversee the area and hold the corporation accountable to laws and taxes in Orlando."
It was then-Disney CEO Bob Chapek who publicly attacked the governor's policies on education and specifically his plans for protecting parental rights in education.
"No corporation should be its government," DeSantis' communications director, Bryan Griffin, said of the action on the lawsuits.
He said, "Moving forward, we stand ready to work with Disney and the district to help promote economic growth, family-friendly tourism, and accountable government in Central Florida."
The report said the settlement sees Disney acknowledging the invalid nature of its special deals with the now-defunct Reedy Creek district.
The new district is the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District Board.
Disney, long a staple for children's entertainment, in recent years, has gone more and more "woke," injecting social agendas into its products, which frequently have been huge disappointments commercially.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Well, that was quick.
On Sunday, Ronna Romney McDaniel, the former chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, made her debut on "Meet the Press" as a paid contributor to NBC News.
Now, reports indicate the network is dropping her, and McDaniel is lawyering up.
"The former top Republican has responded by seeking legal representation after the sudden ousting, as reported by Puck News," the Daily Mail reported.
SCOOP @PuckNews: NBC NEWS plans to drop ex RNC-chair Ronna McDaniel as a paid contributor following on-air revolt from NBC/MSNBC talent. Execs are deliberating over details; announcement pending. Meanwhile, McDaniel is seeking legal representation.
Full details, scoops &…
— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) March 26, 2024
A WND reported Sunday, that Chuck Todd, the former host of NBC's "Meet the Press," erupted on his bosses over the network's hiring of McDaniel moments after she made her debut.
He told the show's new host, Kristin Welker, that NBC should apologize for having Welker interview McDaniel, who resigned her position on March 8 when it became clear former President Donald Trump would clinch the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.
"Let me deal with the elephant in the room," Todd said. "I think our bosses owe you an apology for putting you in this situation because I don't know what to believe."
"She is now a paid contributor by NBC News," he told Welker. "I have no idea whether any answer she gave to you was because she didn't want to mess up her contract."
WATCH: Chuck Todd just attacked his own network, NBC News, over hiring Ronna McDaniel. "Our bosses owe you an apology for putting you in this situation," he told Kristen Welker on Meet the Press. "There's a reason why there's a lot of journalists at NBC News uncomfortable with… pic.twitter.com/gjjhy7s4TN
— TV News Now (@TVNewsNow) March 24, 2024
"She wants us to believe that she was speaking for the RNC when the RNC was paying for it. So, she has credibility issues that she still has to deal with. Is she speaking for herself or is she speaking on behalf of who's paying her? Once at the RNC, she did say that. 'Hey, I'm speaking for the party.' I get that, that's part of the job. So, what about here?" he asked.
"Look, there's a reason why there are a lot of journalists at NBC News uncomfortable with this," Todd said. "Because many of our professional dealings with the RNC over the last six years have been met with gaslighting and have been met with character assassination."
"When NBC decided to give her NBC News' credibility, you got to ask yourself, what does she bring NBC News? And when we make deals like this, and I've been at this company a long time, you're doing it for access. Access to audience. Sometimes it's access to an individual. And we can have a journalistic ethics debate about that. And I'm willing to have that debate," Todd added.
WATCH: Former RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel says she doesn’t support freeing those charged and convicted with crimes related to January 6th — something Donald Trump has promised to do if re-elected.@kwelkernbc: “Why not speak out earlier?”@RonnaMcDaniel: “When you’re the RNC… pic.twitter.com/9wqOoKnUdR
— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) March 24, 2024
MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow called McDaniel's hiring "inexplicable," and indicated she hoped network executives would "reconsider that decision."
Glenn Greenwald, a journalist who co-founded the Intercept, noted such "melodrama" is absent when Democrat "operatives" are hired by networks.
"NBC negotiated a contract with Jen Psaki while she was White House Press Secretary," Greenwald posted on X.
"ABC hired George Stephanopoulos -- directly from the Clinton WH, with no journalism experience. All these networks hire operatives from the US Security State. It never prompts this melodrama."
NBC negotiated a contract with Jen Psaki while she was White House Press Secretary.
ABC hired George Stephanopoulos -- directly from the Clinton WH, with no journalism experience.
All these networks hire operatives from the US Security State.
It never prompts this melodrama: https://t.co/ToExKFxiI8
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) March 24, 2024
Former Trump White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer noted: "Did [Chuck Todd] ever show concern about Jen Psaki joining the left-wing network?... Didn't think so."
Ronna McDaniel is the granddaughter of late Michigan Gov. George Romney and niece of Utah Sen. Mitt Romney.
One creative commenter on X, apparently not thrilled with McDaniel, superimposed a distasteful image over the Republican's face, and played a clip of her saying, "Now I get to be a little bit more myself."
Former RNC chair Ronna McDaniel on NBC Meet The Press
“Now I can be myself” #BoycottMeetThePress pic.twitter.com/BM2npVBe0n
— PoliticalPuertoRican (@PRMemes_) March 24, 2024