This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Gretchen Whitmer, the far-left governor of Michigan, worked for that reputation by micromanaging the lives of state residents during COVID.

She's also worked on an agenda that provides a pathway in the state for her ideologies.

She even was the target of an apparent "kidnap" attempt where federal agents seemed to outnumber suspects, and while some were convicted, others were acquitted, leaving the entire episode a question mark.

Now she's gone a step further than ever before: with a video in which she appears to mock Catholics.

Catholic vote pointed out, "How else can this be interpreted other than mockery of Catholics and the sacrament of Holy Communion, not to mention the distasteful pornographic innuendo? Gretchen Whitmer is only the latest example of the gross anti-Catholic bigotry festering inside the Democratic Party."

The video shows Whitmer feeding a chip to social influencer Liz Plank, who is kneeling on the floor.

The Washington Examiner explained Catholic groups are accusing Whitmer of mocking them.

Catholic Vote demanded an apology: "Any slight mockery of another faith would be met with outrage, and an immediate apology would be issued. Why hasn't she done that yet?"

And, the report said, the Catholic League called her stunt "anti-Catholic bigotry."

"What Whitmer did was to deride Holy Communion," charged Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League. "There is no wiggle room for her to deny the obvious. … What Whitmer did is political suicide."

The report explained the "issue" was CHIPS, the CHIPS Act, affecting tech and manufacturing, boosting domestic production of semiconductors to reduce reliance on foreign suppliers.

Plank claimed that President Donald Trump would put that at risk.

Whitmer and Plank also joked that there's no such thing as post-birth abortion when multiple states, in fact, have abortion laws that appear to allow exactly that. In fact, Kamala Harris' running mate, Tim Walz, as Minnesota governor eliminated a requirement that doctors provide medical care to babies that survive abortion – and then he eliminated the reporting requirement so that no one will know what cases occur.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A "performance review" delivered as an assessment of Kamala Harris' skills, talent and leadership while she was a lawyer in San Francisco delivered a harsh conclusion to the now-Democrat nominee for president.

The evaluation, documented by the Daily Mail, said, "On a scale of one to five, Harris only got a '2' on whether she was 'thorough, helpful, and proactive and only a three on whether she showed good judgment."

It continued, "Harris also got a '2' rating for recognizing deadlines, fast turnaround, and anticipating their needs. Even more embarrassing was her failure to return phone calls and emails promptly."

The report said the evaluation came for Harris when she was a civil lawyer for San Francisco.

"The now vice president took a job with the city of San Francisco after she resigned from the San Francisco district attorney's office after she led a poorly organized coup to overthrow deputy attorney general Darrell Salomon," the report said.

She left the DA's office to work as a deputy attorney for the city's Child Services Unit, in 2000.

But the report said, "As she plotted to challenge her old boss District Attorney Terrence Hallinan for his job, she was not taking her new job seriously."

The verdict was in a Department of Human Services performance review in 2002. The report explained Harris got "favorable" marks for quality of work and advice, but not so good in other categories.

The report said the results were based on a rating by court officers in the unit.

And that assessment warned, "Job performance varies dramatically by individual attorneys, which indicates a lack of communication and leadership in the unit."

The Daily Mail charged, "Harris' performance review is one more example of how she offered only average or even poor leadership in her position after running a successful campaign to achieve it."

Shortly after, she was appointed to two high-paying part-time state board jobs while she was dating then-state assembly Speaker Willie Brown. But the report noted she routinely missed meetings.

After winning the post of district attorney in 2003, "conviction rates fell on her watch followed by a scandal in the crime lab that prompted her to dismiss over a thousand cases," the report said.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

There's no doubt that Joe Biden's cognition no longer is what it once was.

In fact, nearing 82, he was given a pass on charges for mishandling federal documents because of his advanced age and declining mental abilities.

Then, if his verbal and mental stumbles and bumbles over the last few years weren't enough, his performance at the presidential debate with President Donald Trump convinced doubters.

In fact, the elites of the Democrat party gave him the hook, jerked him off the campaign trail, and handed the nomination to Kamala Harris.

Who supposedly was so much more fit to be president.

Only there are doubts.

Because according to a report at Revolver.news, a Harris-supporting cable news network now "admits Kamala got outsmarted by a guy with dementia."

It was Scott Jennings, a senior commentator on CNN, who pointed out her messaging of late, that she's "a new way forward" and but still is going to stay on the same path as the Biden-Harris regime.

She also has conceded that there's "not a thing" she would have done differently from the Biden-Harris administration, should she have been in charge.

"This must be very confusing for American voters," he said.

Revolver had the explanation. "As we get closer to Election Day, this is when the rubber meets the road. These final days are where it all counts. So, who's surging with momentum, and who's sinking like a lead balloon? Well, right now, it's clear: Team Harris/Walz is unraveling, while President Trump is picking up steam. And let's be real—much of Kamala's problem is that she's her own worst enemy. In terms of likability, she's sitting at Hillary Clinton levels of unpopularity. She didn't become one of the most disliked VPs in history by accident."

But her lack of experience, skills, and leadership only makes her off-putting personality worse, the report said.

It explained, "Biden, who was ousted in what looks like a soft coup likely orchestrated by Kamala herself, isn't exactly rolling over and letting Kamala steamroll him. In fact, he's feeling pretty ornery and isn't going down without a fight. Now, he's launched his own 'soft coup' of sorts, but this time it's aimed at Dems and Kamala's campaign. While Kamala tries to have it both ways—claiming in one breath she has a 'new way forward' and in the next insisting everything her current regime has done is flawless—Biden is quietly outmaneuvering her."

It said, "Let's face it, Kamala Harris is getting outsmarted by a guy with dementia."

"We've covered the mess that is Team Harris and their bungled, confusing messaging. It's fascinating to watch a woman who's been in office for nearly four years trying to distance herself from her failed regime, all while acting like everything they did was flawless. Talk about a muddled, absurd message that only the most brainwashed left-wing fanatics could cling to."

WND had reported only a day earlier on Biden's apparent campaign to torpedo the Harris campaign.

For one thing, he's scheduled meetings with the press several times – at the identical time Harris is staging a campaign event, pulling attention away from her.

And for instance, while Harris is desperately trying to assemble a reputation for herself that she would do better than Biden, a "new way" forward, he publicly locked her into all of his administration's worst results. Like massive inflation, massive threats from illegal aliens, massive assaults on the pro-life community and Christians, and more.

"She was a major player in everything we've done," he pointedly noted.

And then there was the time Harris was critical of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' work regarding Hurricane Helene.

Biden pushed back with how he's "been cooperative. … I talked to him again yesterday and I said — a — boy — I said I know you're doing a great job. It's being all — being done well, we thank you for it and I literally gave him my personal phone number to call, so I don't know — there was a rough start in some places, but every governor — every governor — from Florida to North Carolina, has been fully cooperative and supportive and acknowledged what this team is doing and they're doing an incredible job. But we got a lot more work to do."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A new report from the Epoch Times reveals the stunning conclusion from several economists: That the U.S. has been in a recession for the last two years, based on adjustments to the nation's consumer-punishing inflation rates.

And, the report revealed, "According to Bureau of Labor Statistics data, cumulative inflation since 2019 has totaled nearly 25%."

The report explains that economists EJ Antoni and Peter St. Onge have written at the Brownstone Institute that, "Many have questioned the accuracy of official inflation statistics, with dozens of academic papers written on the topic and doubts voiced by sources ranging from the New York Times to former President Donald Trump."

"This matters not only because of the political salience of rising prices, but also because official inflation numbers are used to calculate real economic growth by adjusting nominal dollars to inflation-adjusted dollars."

They explained their goal was a "true understanding of inflation" and "true economic growth."

They first explain the obstacles to their work: "The difficulty in measuring the size of a nation's economy is two-fold. First, there is insufficient data to directly measure the number and size of all transactions in an economy, or to monitor all economic activity. Second, the measuring tool used (in this case, the Federal Reserve note) changes value over time. Thus, fluctuations in the nominal value of economic activity can be due to real changes in economic activity, measurement error of economic activity, or changes in the value of a currency."

However, they identified multiple problems with the government's process that "tend to underestimate the rise in prices over time. These shortcomings have been more pronounced over the last four years during a relatively rapid depreciation of the currency."

Kamala Harris, the Democrat nominee for president, of course right now is trying to distance herself from the failures of the Biden-Harrius administration in which she's play a major role, according to statements from Joe Biden.

The study concerns itself with offering "an alternative adjustment for converting nominal growth to real growth by more accurately reflecting changes in the cost of living over time."

They explained the cost of renting or owning a home is a significant part of any inflation equation, and the government's CPI vastly underestimates the costs of housing inflation.

Further, the burden on consumers from governmental regulations are faulty because of "perceived" benefits to consumers, perceived by government workers, "that do not actually exist."

"For example, if it is assumed that a regulation increases the quality of a product, then even a dramatic increase in price could register as no price change or even a price decline in the national accounting which is used to compute gross domestic product (GDP)," they said.

Then there are "indirect" purchases, like the costs of health insurance, an issue that the CPI "neglects," they said.

They point out that, for example, while the "nominal" change in disposable personal income was 35.3%, the real change was 12.9%. Likewise with retail sales, the nominal change was 23.1% but the real change was 3.2%.

"Note that not only are the inflation adjustments large, but they are highly variable, ranging from under 20% for wholesale sales to 22% to 23% for manufacturing inventories and new orders," they said. "While 3% may seem like a small difference, in the context of GDP growth it represents nearly a $1 trillion difference in real output – roughly the GDP of Saudi Arabia. And in the context of annual economic growth, 3% over a 4-year period is a very large number – the difference between robust and anemic growth. Or between anemic growth and recession," they wrote.

They said, too, "The real increase of 12.9% in disposable income from the first quarter of 2019 through the second quarter of 2024 becomes a real decrease of 2.3 percent over that period – an aggregate 15% difference."

They said during President Trump's tenure, his deregulation actually "led to marginal decreases in the cost of living which were not captured by official inflation metrics," but that trend "had fully reversed by the fourth quarter of 2022 under Biden-Harris."

"Summing the entire period, nominal GDP at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate in the second quarter of 2024 was 37.4% higher than the first quarter of 2019," they explained. "A significant portion of this increase, however, is merely inflation. The BEA's inflation adjustment reduces growth over this period from 37.4 percent to 13.7 percent, or nearly two-thirds of nominal growth."

They found, "According to our adjustments, cumulative inflation since 2019 has been understated by nearly half. This has resulted in cumulative growth being overstated by roughly 15%. This is a large amount for just 5 years – for perspective, peak-to-trough drop in real GDP during the 2008 crisis was 4%. Moreover, these adjustments indicate that the American economy has actually been in recession since 2022.

"These conclusions are in stark contrast to the establishment narrative that the U.S. economy is enjoying robust growth that for some reason the public is incapable of perceiving. Indeed, our results are consistent with the perceptions of the American public, of whom a majority believe we are in recession," the report said.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Joe Biden, cast aside by Democrat party elites who then hand-picked Kamala Harris and stunningly handed her the party's nomination for president, even though she's never won a primary vote, is giving a good impression that he's not happy with that decision.

Of course he announced at the time he was voluntarily dropping his campaign and endorsing Harris and telling everyone to support her.

But the appearances bely that.

For example, a report at Revolver.news explains that while Harris is desperately trying to assemble a reputation for herself that she would do better than Biden, a "new way" forward, he publicly locked her into all of his administration's worst results. Like massive inflation, massive threats from illegal aliens, massive assaults on the pro-life community and Christians, more.

"She was a major player in everything we've done," he pointedly noted.

And then there was the time Harris was critical of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' work regarding Hurricane Helene.

Biden pushed back with how he's "been cooperative. … I talked to him again yesterday and I said — a — boy — I said I know you're doing a great job. It's being all — being done well, we thank you for it and I literally gave him my personal phone number to call, so I don't know — there was a rough start in some places, but every governor — every governor — from Florida to North Carolina, has been fully cooperative and supportive and acknowledged what this team is doing and they're doing an incredible job. But we got a lot more work to do."

Multiple times Biden, who rarely has appeared for questions from the press, has appeared on stage for questions at exactly the same time Harris had a campaign appearance scheduled.

He then doubled down on Harris' full involvement in all his administration has done, which would appear to include the 21% inflation he's allowed to hit consumers, the massive costs of food and fuel, the catastrophe at the southern border with millions of illegal aliens invading after President Donald Trump's border security measures were trashed, and falling American reputation around the world, the threat of multiple wars, and more.

The Revolver report explained the Biden-bashes-Harris perspective: "You know a politician is desperate when they start attacking well-qualified, proven leaders and 'natural disaster' pros with cheap shots just to grab some airtime and look like they're in control—or something like that. That's exactly what a flailing and sinking Kamala Harris is doing right now, going after Governor Ron DeSantis, who could mop the floor with her and her lack of abilities. Kamala is crashing in the polls, and every interview she does turns into a disaster. She's grasping at straws, desperately trying to generate some positive PR—and once again, that's failing too. Especially after we saw how she ignored the devastated people of North Carolina. All she offered them was $750, then turned around and sent $160 million to foreigners in Lebanon. Shameful."

The report noted Harris' charged DeSantis is "playing politics" but Biden's response was that DeSantis is doing great.

Biden also pushed Harris "under the bus" with his comments linking her closely to his administration's record, the report said.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Joe Biden once wildly made a claim, presumed to be rhetorical because of its incompatibility with the facts, that when a gun is used to fire a 9mm bullet at a person the shot "blows the lung out of the body."

Now his vice president, Kamala Harris, is promoting that very weapon.

It's one of the many flip-flops that Harris has adopted as she tries to position herself as a moderate in her run for the presidency.

In that mode, she's promoted fracking, which she had vigorously opposed, and she's now all of a sudden in favor of border security, which the Biden-Harris administration literally destroyed over the last nearly four years, among many other flip-flops.

But her advocacy for firearms, including her promise to shoot someone if they would break into her home, has been perhaps the most jarring reversal.

Back when she was San Fransisco district attorney, she signed onto a Supreme Cour brief demanding a ban on handguns. The justices rejected her arguments, finding there is an individual right under the Second Amendment for firearms.

Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley was among those who have pointed out her attempt to move from one end of the scale to the opposite.

"The reinvention of Vice President Kamala Harris in this election has been a thing to behold. In politics, candidates often reconstruct their records to secure votes, but Harris appears to have constructed an entirely mythical being. Once ranked to the left of socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders and viewed as among the most liberal members of the Senate, Harris has sought to convince the public that she is actually a frack-loving, gun-toting, border-defending moderate," he explained.

He cited Harris' recent comments on a television talk show where she said she is a gun owner and, "if somebody breaks into my house, they're getting shot."

She later repeated the claim to 60 Minutes and said she's attended pistol ranges to shoot. The report said her gun reportedly is a semiautomatic Glock handgun, a firearm that often uses 9mm ammunition.

Turley noted Harris' threats are in "stark contrast" to her opposition to self-defense laws.

In fact, the Biden-Harris administration repeatedly has suggested that semiautomatics are unneeded and if there's a change on the Supreme Court, they could be banned.

Biden literally, "suggested in the past that he might seek to ban 9mm weapons," Turley noted.

"Biden saying there's 'no rational basis' to own 9mms makes the new Harris look … well … irrational," Turley noted.

Harris' record includes her statement, "Do you know what an assault weapon is? It was designed for a specific purpose, to kill a lot of human beings quickly. An assault weapon is a weapon of war, with no place, no place in a civil society."

The Biden-Harris agenda for weapons hasn't been exactly logical, either.

"President Biden showed the same disconnect as Harris between the factual and the rhetorical basis for some gun-control measures. He condemned 'high-caliber weapons' like 9mm handguns and said 'a .22-caliber bullet will lodge in the lung, and we can probably get it out — may be able to get it and save the life. A 9mm bullet blows the lung out of the body.'"

Turley noted, "Biden has not made any comment on Harris promising to blow away anyone coming into her house with her own Glock."

He said Harris "is not the first politician to reinvent herself on the campaign trail. For now, Harris wants to be clear that 'I have a Glock, and I've had it for quite some time.' For critics, the reload is a bit much given her record."

Her willingness to shoot someone, though, has been made clear.

"If somebody breaks into my house, they're getting shot," she stated. "Sorry, probably shouldn't have said that! Ha ha ha!"

The Gateway Pundit turned blunt, "Gun Control Hypocrite Kamala Harris Admits on Live TV That She and Walz Are Gun Owners and She Would Shoot Intruders, Then Regrets Saying It."

Her comment came in an interview with entertainer Oprah Winfrey, and the "unscripted moment laid bare her duplicity."

The Daily Mail described Harris' comments as a "shocking threat."

WND already had reported on her proclamation that any time they wanted, police could walk into a home and check whether the resident was doing what they wanted with his or her guns.

Now Tucker Carlson commented: "This is openly totalitarian. If we don't resist this, we're done."

Harris also has talked about taking action against gun owners by executive order, and not waiting for Congress to make such actions legal.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

JERUSALEM – Considering the number of top – and in the case of several of Hezbollah's leaders – internationally wanted criminal terrorists who have met their demise over the last few months, it is the fate of two in particular about which there is currently enormous intrigue.

In ascending order of importance, the far more junior of these two figures is Hamas chief Yahya Sinwar. He has not been heard from for several weeks, with rumors spreading like wildfire that he had met his demise in an Israeli missile strike on his former Rafah stronghold. A recent image of IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Herzi Halevi shows a split screen behind him with Hezbollah's top leaders on one side and Hamas' on the other. Almost all of Hamas' top leaders had a big red cross through their images (as did Hezbollah's) – indicating they had been eliminated – but for Sinwar, a large question mark appeared.

One doesn't want to bandy about the Hitlerian comparisons too readily, although it is inescapable. A leader who gambles his people's fate, attacking a stronger enemy and after initial successes trying to marshal ever-more-illusory military resources as the tide turns, and taking to hiding in an underground bunker as the vice's grip becomes ever tighter. The fact there is an assumption if Sinwar is still alive that he is "protected" by those he deems the most high-value hostages is a slight departure.

Meanwhile, according to Israel's Channel 12, Qatari officials mediating hostage deal talks with Hamas told the families of captives last week that Sinwar was no longer calling them. If this is the case, it is no doubt due to the fate of thousands of Hezbollah operatives – up to and including Hassan Nasrallah – whose whereabouts were pinpointed following the astonishing success of the bombs in beeper and two-way radios operation. Presumably, Sinwar, who if nothing else has a cast-iron desire for his own preservation – no matter the cost to the people he purportedly represents – is taking extra precautions to avoid Nasrallah's fate. Indeed, Qatari officials have strongly suggested Sinwar, who is only using pen and paper with which to communicate, is still alive.

Some in Israel's defense establishment assess Sinwar was likely killed in an Israeli airstrike, although this is not a view American officials share. They argue his retreat from view is the most effective way he can try and secure his longevity; and furthermore, he is not at all out of the loop, and is an integral part in Hamas' decision-making. With the first anniversary of the Oct. 7 massacre imminent, will there be renewed Hamas attacks – possibly with longer-range missiles targeting central Israel – and will Sinwar reappear to give the impression he is orchestrating them?

There are arguments on both sides of the ledger. Rawhi Mushtaha, a trusted Sinwar consigliere, who was instrumental in the note-passing business, was killed some three months ago, which Israel only announced on Thursday. Perhaps there are echoes of the death of Mohammed Deif too. His presence at a Hamas meeting on July 13 was confirmed and his location pinpointed – again through the use of a courier – and immediately followed by massive ordnance at that exact site. Israel was almost certain it had gotten its man – at something like the eighth time of asking – although it took until Aug. 1 for Hamas to verify the rumors.

Sinwar's potential killing also raises very uncomfortable questions for both Israel's political and military leaders. If he was not able to be drawn away from the hostages that almost every intelligence source admits he surrounds himself with, it seems inevitable they would be killed along with him. Despite his position as Public Enemy #1, there would likely be serious ramifications for the government if some two dozen hostages – according to some estimates – were slain at the same time as the architect of Oct. 7

However, even more critical than Sinwar, is an answer to the fate of Esmail Qaani, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Quds Force general. There are several (uncorroborated) reports that the successor to Qassem Soleimani, whom the United States eliminated on Iraqi soil in 2020, was visiting Beirut in the wake of Israel Air Force missile strikes, which decimated and decapitated Hezbollah's leadership.

Qaani's last public appearance was in Tehran, some 48 hours after the massive missile strike which extinguished Hassan Nasrallah. The IRGC leader was a notable absence from Friday prayers in Tehran, which eulogized and exalted the slain Hezbollah leader. Qaani was thought to be meeting Hashem Safieddine, who was chosen to replace Nasrallah, in Beirut's Dahiyeh neighborhood. Three Iranian officials have subsequently confirmed the Quds Force leader was indeed in Beirut at the time of the Israeli strike. His absence and the manner of his apparent demise is also said to be causing wide-spread panic among IRGC operatives.

Following Iran's ballistic missile attack on Israel, which is thought to have at least partly successfully targeted military bases and installations, the entire region is on a knife's edge. Israel has yet to respond to this latest attack, although the Home Front Command in the Jewish state has warned citizens an Israeli strike on Iran – whether it's Tehran itself, one or more nuclear facilities, and/or Iran's petroleum industry – will likely be met with more ballistic and cruise missiles flying in the other direction. Qaani's potential death at Israel's hands might only harden Iran's resolve – if any were really needed – to keep those missiles flying.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

There's been a lot reported about the vice presidential debate between GOP candidate JD Vance and Democrat Tim Walz.

What they said has been in many reports, including Walz's claim to be friends with school shooters.

And there was Vance when he called out the CBS moderators, who had promised not to fact-check, for lying about that and fact-checking anyway.

But now the comments from a "body language expert" are revealing that there was "panic" on Walz's face when he was asked about China.

It concerns Walz's previous claims to have been in Tiananmen Square in China around the time of that horrific and deadly confrontation between protesters and the communist regime's military.

It turns out that he was in Nebraska at the time he's suggested that he was overseas, and CBS asked.

According to a report by Fox, body language expert Scott Rouse noted that Walz was panicky, and tried to avoid answering.

"One of the debate's most surprising moments came when the CBS debate moderators confronted the governor about his claim that he had been in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests, when he actually traveled to Asia in August 1989, a few months later," Fox reported.

Rouse said Walz's face showed his fear.

"And the rest of this, this is panic, we see his eyes doing this, that's panic," Rouse said, drawing on a screen. He added further that Walz's lower face and head indicated he was in "panic mode."

The report noted Rouse then called attention "to what he said was Walz's biggest hand gesture of the night."

"This is the one that's come out further from his body than anything else, because he's trying to make sure – 'I want you to believe me! You gotta believe me!' That's what we're seeing, the panic here. Wide eyes, grief muscle, and everything's far out."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Kamala Harris, facing an electoral challenge in Michigan where there is a large population of American Muslims unhappy with America being allied with Israel, has allowed her vice presidential pick, Tim Walz, to promise that religious community a "side-by-side" role in her White House, should she be elected.

"Vice President Harris and I are committed that this White House will continue to condemn in all forms anti-Islam, anti-Arab sentiments being led by Donald Trump, but more importantly, a commitment that Muslims will be engaged in this administration and serve side by side," he promised.

His comments were made during an appearance with the Islamic advocacy group called Emgage Action.

The promise comes from a candidate, who in his current position as governor of Minnesota, repeatedly has advocated for an anti-Christian agenda. He's schemed for literally unrestricted abortion, has authorized a law allowing his state to take custody of children in order to give them transgender body mutilations, and has essentially banned Christians from teaching in public schools because he requires all instructors to advocate for the LGBT agenda.

report at the Gateway Pundit pointed to Walz's efforts "to try and woo Muslim voters."

"Amid growing concern among party strategists that the conflict in Gaza may be hurting their support among American Muslims, Walz joined the Islamic advocacy group Emgage Action to promise them they will have an equal voice in policymaking should the Democratic ticket win in November," the report said.

Walz also promised to block Israel's response to the war launched by the Hamas terrorists in Gaza when they invaded Israel a year ago and slaughtered some 1,200 innocent civilians.

Walz promised, without details, "The scale of death and destruction in Gaza is staggering and devastating."

The report added, "In May, The Gateway Pundit reported on the 'Abandon Biden' movement, which has now turned its attention to Kamala Harris. The campaign urges people to refrain from voting Democrat until it takes a position as a pro-Palestinian party. Such a loss in support is particularly troubling for Harris in a state such as Michigan, which has a sizeable Muslim population that could determine the outcome of a close election given its position as one of the largest and most important swing states."

A Democrat Michigan Senate candidate, in fact, openly has doubted Harris' prospects in the state.

Reuters added details about Walz's promise for a Muslim-specific influence with Harris.

"Though Emgage has endorsed Harris, other Muslim groups have urged supporters not to back her in the election, especially after Democrats rejected requests for a Palestinian speaker at the party convention in August," the report said. "Harris has offered no substantive policy differences on Israel from Biden, who stepped aside as presidential candidate in July."

President Donald Trump has expressed strong support for Israel. During his first term he moved the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, and he orchestrated the Abraham Accords, key peace agreements involving Israel and multiple Arab neighbors.

The Reuters report said other Muslim groups have not supported Trump. Nor have they given in to Harris' entreaties so far, often offering backing to Green Party candidate Jill Stein.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Gordon Sondland, a wealthy business magnate appointed to an ambassadorship by President Donald Trump, was a witness for the prosecution in one of ex-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's failed impeach-and-remove schemes against Trump.

Sondland expressed at the time his concern that the events of Jan. 6, 2021, the protest-turned-riot at the Capitol, were a threat to democracy, and he was fired by Trump.

Now he's voting for Trump.

Why? Because the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris "threats" to democracy are eclipsing the perceived danger from Jan. 6.

Sondland, interviewed on MSNBC, was asked about his earlier commitment that he was a "no" vote on Trump.

"No, I don't stand by that, and I'll tell you why," he said.

"I've now lived four years under the Biden Harris policies and I have to say that those policies are not only becoming an existential threat to our country's way of life but to our allies as well."

Interrupted by the MSNBC talk show entertainer, he said, "I want to finish."

"It is a yes for me. It is an absolute yes for me. That is how badly the Biden Harris team have prosecuted their job."

When asked about the idea the Jan. 6 events were "bigger" than policies, he said, "I am seeing so many attacks on democracy that eclipse January 6."

The Biden Harris agenda, besides the moral and social issues of abortion and transgenderism for children, which the administration constantly promotes, has included destroying the First Amendment, pursuing lawfare cases against political opponents to jail them, including attempts, just days before the election, to create negative publicity about Trump with unproven claims, and worse.

Sondland, a businessman who built a chain of hotels, was U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, by Trump's appointment, from 2018 to 2020.

He testified as a witness at Pelosi's impeachment scheme, and was dismissed after Trump was acquitted of Pelosi's charges.

In that post he was caught up in the Democrats' wild claims about a telephone call between President Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky.

In fact, he had affirmed that there were no "quid pro quos" in Trump's call for an investigation into Biden family financial scandals involving Ukrainian companies.

He later said he did believe that a U.S. offer of an aid package was dependent on Ukraine reopening an investigation into a reportedly corrupt Burisma corporation that was paying Hunter Biden $1 million a year to be on its board, even though he had no energy industry experience.

Evidence has suggested that the payments were being made to obtain favor from Joe Biden when he was vice president for Barack Obama and assigned to handle U.S. relations with Ukraine.

In fact, Joe Biden is on video boasting that he was the one who demanded that a prosecutor investigating Burisma be fired or he would withhold American aid to Ukraine.

Patriot News Alerts delivers timely news and analysis on U.S. politics, government, and current events, helping readers stay informed with clear reporting and principled commentary.
© 2026 - Patriot News Alerts