This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A federal judge has ruled on CNN's claim it is protected from a defamation lawsuit because it was using Shariah law ideology when it charged a man helping people escape from Afghanistan after the disastrous troop withdrawal done by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris was "black market."
And that claim goes "too far," the ruling said.
A Fox News report explains also that the plaintiff in the case, Zachary Young, "did not act illegally or criminally," in contradiction to what the network publicly claimed.
Hundreds of Americans and thousands of Afghanis who had supported the American presence there were abandoned by Biden and Harris when they ordered the abrupt departure of American troops.
While they left behind billions of dollars worth of America war machine, which ended up in the hands of the terror-creating Taliban, the human toll was huge, and the Taliban cracked down on anyone it viewed as not being fully supportive of its terror agenda.
Young charges that CNN "destroyed his reputation and business by branding him an illegal profiteer who exploited desperate Afghans" during that time frame.
Fox reported it obtained documents in which Judge William S. Henry ruled Young did not act "criminally or illegally," and said CNN comments about a black market ring were about Young.
The CNN programming included host Jake Tapper "informing viewers that CNN correspondent Alex Marquardt discovered 'Afghans trying to get out of the country face a black market full of promises, demands of exorbitant fees, and no guarantee of safety or success.'"
Then Young singled out Young in its claims of "black market," "exploit" and "exorbitant."
The report noted CNN's lawyers had claimed there are multiple definitions of "black market" and that his actions "implicated Taliban or Sharia law violations."
The judge found, "First, there is nothing in the record to suggest that any Taliban or Sharia law which would restrict the movement of persons (especially women) within or out of Afghanistan was properly enacted, adopted or recognized law to even suggest that evacuating individuals from Afghanistan was a criminal or illegal activity. In fact, the only information contained in the record suggests that formal adoption of any rules restricting travel within or out of Afghanistan did not occur until 2024 – almost three years after the publications in this case."
And the judge pointed out that CNN's own reporting "did not uncover illegal or criminal activity committed by Young."
A trial now is scheduled to start Jan. 6, 2025, in Florida.
CNN was widely mocked earlier for claiming the protection of Shariah.
Sharia, for example, according to an online definition, calls for atrocities including amputation of a thief's hands, killing people for criticizing the Quran, killing people who deny Muhammad was a prophet, killing people who lead a Muslim away from Islam, killing a non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman, killing homosexuals (although sodomizing young boys is allowed), and "taqiyya" or lying to non-Muslims, is encouraged.
Please be aware of multiple instances of offensive language in the following:
Just recently, a Florida appellate court affirmed that Young, a U.S. Navy veteran, and his company, Nemex Enterprises Inc., could seek punitive damages from CNN.
The report said Young's lawyer charged that Young lost $40-60 million in economic opportunity.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Early voting for the 2024 presidential race already has started in multiple states, and that means reports of voting machines flipping votes from Donald Trump to Kamala Harris already have begun arriving.
It's a complaint that has surfaced in multiple elections already, voters choosing on screen the Republican candidate, but the machine recording it as a vote for the Democrat, a scenario that often is difficult to document because of the inability to take screen shots of a voting machine and more.
Voting-machine makers continue to stand by the functioning of their devices.
But multiple reports already have been documented in this election.
It is the Gateway Pundit that assembled the information.
At the head of the list reporting such fraud was Bo French, the Tarrant County, Texas, chairman of the Republican Party.
The report noted he "was notified that voters who selected Trump on the screen of the voting machine were seeing Kamala Harris on the final printed ballot."
"Today at 3:29pm I was notified of reports that voters were experiencing problems. Reports were that people who selected Trump on the screen were seeing Harris on the printed ballot. This was reported to the Election Judge and in at least one case the voter was issued a new ballot to vote again. I immediately reported this to the TC Elections Administrator," French confirmed.
He warned voter to check their ballots.
"I voted for one president, checked it on the video screen, when I got the paper ballot, it had the other candidate's name on it," one Tarrant County voter said in the report.
Similar election fraud was being suggested in Georgia.
"According to GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a constituent in Whitfield County noticed that their printed ballot did not reflect the selections they made on the voting machine, particularly changing their vote away from candidates they had chosen," the report confirmed.
She, too, warned, "Georgia voters make sure you double check your printed ballot to make sure the candidates you voted for are listed before you turn in your ballot!!!"
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
JERUSALEM – The United States is apparently investigating the source of a leak of top secret documents that purport to show detailed plans of Israel's presumed retaliation for Iran's ballistic missile strike on the Jewish state on Oct. 1. The documents found their way to a pro-Iranian Telegram channel, where they were published.
The two files were published by a pro-Iran Telegram account, the "Middle East Spectator," which claimed they were sent by a source in the Pentagon and detailed U.S. observations of measures taken by the Israeli Air Force on Oct. 15–16 in the lead-up to a purported attack, according to a report in the Times of Israel.
Neither the Pentagon nor the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence officially commented on the leak. However, in the early hours of Sunday morning Israel time, an American official did confirm the documents were genuine, prompting an investigation into the leak.
Perhaps unsurprisingly it was Axios' own Biden administration stenographer Barak Ravid who broke the story, and it was reported a senior Israeli official told the Axios news site the defense establishment was taking the leak very seriously.
Whether the source of the leak is found or not – and the Biden administration's record is not good, to say the least – this latest event represents a nadir in relations between the United States and Israel. Jerusalem enjoyed – if that is the correct word in the circumstances – a period of sustained successes, seemingly precisely because Israel's political and military leaders ignored Washington's advice. The very fruits of their labors seemed to broadcast how Israel's interests had been significantly advanced, precisely because they had done the opposite of what the Biden administration wanted them to do.
Remember, Vice President and Democratic nominee for the presidency Kamala Harris, who hubristically declared she had studied the maps and therefore, cautioned against the IDF's entry into Rafah. The retrieval of some hostages and the elimination late last week of the Oct. 7 mastermind Yahya Sinwar is evidence, if any were needed, of just how out of her depth Harris truly is.
Furthermore, the IAF strikes which took out Hezbollah secretary-general Hassan Nasrallah, one of his most trusted consigliere Fuad Shukr, and the elimination of Hamas "political" leader Ismail Haniyeh, were all kept secret from the U.S., clearly – and justifiably – because Israel has an enormous deficit of trust with regard to the American administration.
One of the functionaries under the most scrutiny is Ariane Tabatabai from the Pentagon's Office of Low-intensity Conflict/Special Operations, where she works with Christopher Maier. There are others too around whom suspicion of their loyalties is heightened, including Maher Bitai, and the disgraced – although still influential – Robert Malley.
At the very least, the leak gives Israel enormous pause for thought about multiple aspects of the Biden administration and its attitude toward the Jewish state. While the tired and unhelpful line about "Israel having a right to defend itself" is trotted out ad infinitum, it is becoming less clear what this actually means, and to what end this current administration actually believes this mantra.
Furthermore, there is some confusion about how penetrative U.S. intelligence is. The execrable vice president sought to take credit – perhaps another case of stolen valor if you will, which seems to be a problem with the top of the Democratic presidential ticket – for American intelligence assistance in helping to track and corner Sinwar.
The fact he was taken out unexpectedly by an ordinary unit while on a somewhat routine reconnaissance mission – and not by an elite commando unit – rather suggests this was not the case. But it has caused some to wonder how much the U.S. knew about the Oct. 7, 2023, attack, and whether it simply chose not to share any of that information.
It is a seriously sorry state of affairs when the only impression left is of the Biden-Harris administration not wanting Israel to win its war against Iran and its multiple proxies. Is it simply a case of sunk costs – the United States having wasted so much political, diplomatic and monetary capital trying to bring the Islamic Republic in from the cold as per former President Obama's phantasy? Or is it something more nefarious?
What cannot be denied is at every turn different actors in this administration have put impediment after impediment in Israel's way, making the job of actually winning significantly more difficult.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Liz Cheney, an ex-congresswoman from Wyoming tossed out of office by her own voters, was a key to the partisan committee ex-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi created to try to find fault with President Donald Trump over the Jan. 6, 2021, protest-turned-riot in Washington.
Cheney famously sided with Democrats in a long list of votes and actions against Trump, who was impeached twice – and acquitted twice – on charges created by Democrats.
She was a leader of that J6 committee, and evidence shows she tried to skew the evidence to suppress information that exonerated Trump.
That's from the chief of the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, Rep. Barry Loudermilk, who cited new evidence that Cheney communicated with a key Jan. 6 witness behind her lawyer's back.
Loudermilk said that's among the issues that "may warrant future referrals to the Justice Department," the report explained.
His committee started investigating the previous committee's agenda, which supposedly was to explain the events of that day.
"Well, the main issue is exactly what you just laid out, that you have a member of Congress who is an attorney, who knows— I'm not an attorney, but I know at least you know some of the basics of attorney-client privilege and representation — that it's unethical, if not, in some cases illegal, you know, that you cannot have conversations or meetings with someone who already has representation without that attorney present," Loudermilk explained in an interview with John Solomon Reports.
"Cheney did not notify or seek permission from Hutchinson's defense counsel, which is unusual," the report confirmed.
And it explained, "The communications are the latest in a string of concerns Loudermilk's investigation has raised concerning the Democrat-run Jan. 6 Select Committee that finished its work in December 2022. His committee previously found that the select committee failed to preserve documents, data and video depositions from its investigation, including the video of Hutchinson's testimony."
Cheney's contacts with Hutchinson, Loudermilk confirmed, undermine the integrity of the Democrat-led campaign against Trump.
The report explained, "Loudermilk said Cheney may have taken the risk to contact Hutchinson, without her lawyer Stefan Passantino's knowledge, because her further testimony was essential to advance a preferred narrative about Jan. 6."
Experts explained to Just the News D.C. Bar rules that ban contact with a party being represented by another attorney may still control even when it's a congressional committee investigation.
But the normal practice would be to work through a legal representative, the report said.
"Just the News previously documented several of new narratives Hutchinson brought to the committee memorialized in an errata sheet, including the infamous story about then-President Trump allegedly grabbing the wheel of the presidential vehicle in anger after the Secret Service allegedly refused to take him to the Capitol. Errata sheets are sent by court or hearing stenographers to a witness, giving them the chance to correct typographic or minor errors. Hutchinson's 'errata' went far beyond that. Though this claim was directly refuted by the driver of the vehicle, the Democrat-run Jan. 6 Committee credited that information in its final report as being credible," the report said.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Kamala Harris refused Thursday to attend the Al Smith charity dinner in New York, an event no presidential candidate has snubbed since Walter Mondale's absence in 1984, when he lost 49 of the 50 states in the election; but she sent a video.
And to make political points she mocked Christians, claimed an affinity to Catholics and even featured a misquote of the Bible.
She appears apparently starting to address to fundraising event, then was "interrupted" by an actress with some silly comments, leaving the result "cringey," according to an analysis by Matt Margolis of PJMedia.
And they took a decidedly juvenile bent, with the actress who "interrupted" Harris explaining, "Sometimes when I get nervous I stick my fingers under my arms and I sniff them…"
Her message, sexist throughout, was, "Don't you see, man, we need a woman to represent us. A woman brings more heart, more compassion, and think how smart she must be to become a top contender in a field dominated by men. It's time for a woman, bro."
Then the suggestion came, "Don't lie … Thou shall not bear false witness to thy neighbor."
Actually that's a misquote, as the verse is more widely explained as, "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor."
The PJMedia report explained the video address started serious, but then turned another direction with the appearance of actress Molly Shannon, in the role of a Saturday Night Live character Mary Katherine Gallagher.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Democrats have been characterizing President Donald Trump as a "Hitler" for years already… at least as far back as 2015, before his first campaign for office.
During his first term, he confirmed the falsehood of that claim, as he didn't even try to prosecute Hillary Clinton, whose behavior actually could have substantiated a case, because, he explained, that would not be best for the nation.
But leftists and others have continued to rant about "Hitler" being on the 2024 ballot, and finding their claims failing to move the masses, have gone to extremities.
Now he's "Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini."
Or, as one social media snark said, "Hitstalini." And another, unimpressed, said, "I'm waiting for the article 'Why Democrats sound like Stalin, Pol Pot and Kim Jong Un.'"
When Hitler isn't bad enough! https://t.co/tEIKp9Ib2F
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) October 18, 2024
The Atlantic with a threefer. pic.twitter.com/LI6CaFQtGw
— Tom Bevan (@TomBevanRCP) October 18, 2024
These people need to lose and lose hard. https://t.co/YAzZlcZne7
— RBe (@RBPundit) October 18, 2024
WND previously has documented the long campaign of describing Trump as "Hitler."
"Close your eyes. Remember what you saw on television. Remember seeing those neo-Nazis and Klansmen and white supremacists coming out of a field with lighted torches, veins bulging, spewing the same anti-Semitic bile heard across Europe in the '30s. Remember the violent clash that ensued, between those spreading hate and those with the courage to stand against it. And remember what the president said when asked. He said there were, quote, very fine people on both sides. That was a wake-up call for us as a country."
That was Joe Biden, formally accepting his party's nomination for president at the Democratic National Convention, before he was booted by Democrat Party elites and replaced by Kamala Harris.
The report said, "Indeed, what has become known as the 'Charlottesville lie' has been continually refuted for three years by virtually everyone both on the right and on the left. Trump never said Nazis are "very fine people." It's an absurd and outrageous lie.
Yet Biden's blatant dishonesty is just part of a much larger pattern of Democrats continuously tying President Trump to Hitler, the single most detested genocidal monster in human history.
In fact, ex-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has cited Trump's use of "stormtroopers."
Rep. James Clyburn made the same comparison in a CNN interview, insisting federal law enforcement during Trump's presidency was "Gestapo activities."
Before his first election, no fewer than five different Washington Post writers likened candidate Donald Trump to Hitler – including essayist Shalom Auslander's "Don't compare Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler. It belittles Hitler" and a column by Richard Cohen, a Post political writer for five decades, headlined "Trump's Hitlerian disregard for the truth."
MSNBC's Chris Matthews claimed, on Trump's first inauguration, it was "Hitlerian."
The report added, "During the 2020 primary season, CNN anchor Don Lemon compared Trump to Hitler on-air. In discussing the media's proper role in covering Trump, Lemon said: 'Think about Hitler. Think about any of those people … If you could look back in history, would you say, 'Well, I'm so glad that person was allowed a platform so that they could spread their hate and propaganda and lies,' or would you say, 'That probably wasn't the right thing to do to spread that because you knew in that moment that was a bad person and they were doing bad things. And not only were they hurting people, they were killing people.'"
Why the insane comparisons., as Adolf Hitler murdered 11 million while Trump has murdered none?
Explained the report, "Consider that the only truly moral and courageous response to the real Adolf Hitler during the real Third Reich was to try to kill him. There were 16 known plots to assassinate Hitler, and all of the participants – who were eventually executed, including the beloved Lutheran pastor and theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, hanged by the Nazis for his role in the '20 July plot' – are today universally regarded as heroes and martyrs. Therefore, comparing Trump to Hitler constitutes an insidious invitation to any of the countless violent leftwing crazies out there to attempt to assassinate the president, just like the 'Bernie Bro' who shot at multiple Republican congressmen at a 2017 charity baseball practice, almost killing and gravely wounding Rep. Steve Scalise."
The strategy is that casting Trump as Hitler, and his supporters as deplorable white-supremacist neo-Nazi types, comprises the entire moral core of the Democratic Party's claim to be the rightful inheritors of permanent political power in America.
Further, the report said, "If you were truly fighting a genocidal monster like Hitler, almost nothing would be out of bounds for you. Essentially there would be no rules – and that's exactly the way the left likes it. No rules."
Even more recently, WND reported that Democrats' continual journeys of rhetoric into la-la land has another purpose.
To "prime Democrat voters for violent resistance should Trump win in November."
That's according to commentator John Daniel Davidson at The Federalist.
He cited Kamala Harris' recent comments, that Trump wants the "weaponizing of government," that he "talked about going after people who are engaged in peaceful protest," that "He has talked about locking people up because they disagree with him," that Trump "considers anyone who doesn't support him to be an enemy of the United States."
He explained Harris' obsession with the idea that Trump would hurt America:
"The purpose of it isn't just to scare voters into casting their ballot against the former president, or to provoke some unstable would-be assassin into taking a shot at Trump (although some Democrats no doubt see that as a happy by-product of this Trump-as-dictator rhetoric). Its main purpose is to prime Democrat voters for violent resistance should Trump win in November," he charged.
Despite all the rhetoric, voters, according to polls, give Trump at least an even chance at winning November's election.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A new report confirms that the dirty tricks appearing in the 2024 presidential election race now include threatening letters sent to supporters of President Donald Trump.
The letters say, "Your vote for this guy is seen as treading on my rights. You tread on me at your peril…" and then add an obscenity.
"We look forward to visiting in the future," the letter, signed by a "Patriotic citizen and a true American," threatens.
It is the post-millennial that reports the letters have been appearing in the Philadelphia region.
Coming through the U.S. Postal Service they are on a copied Trump campaign letterhead.
"The printed letters begin with the salutation 'Dear Neighbor' before briefly mentioning reasons not to vote for Donald Trump and JD Vance.
Then the threats surface: "We know where you live, you are in the database," "There is no knowing what may happen," and "Your family may be impacted, your cat may get shot."
The letter rants: "Your candidate is a felon, rapist, desecrator, an immoral flawed man. He is the major reason (sic) violence (sic) up, remember January 6th and Charlottesville? By supporting him you are declaring your public support for a disregard of the law, civil discourse, and unity. You are indicating your hatred for minorities, immigrants, foreigners, women, education, the rights of your fellow citizens, and the rights of women to make decisions about their own healthcare needs. Oh and yes a hatred for Taylor Swift, who has contributed nothing but joy to the world."
Filled with inaccuracies, it suggests damages and injuries may come: "In the dead of a cold winter (sic) night, this year, or next and beyond, there is no knowing what may happen. Your property, your family may be impacted…"
The report said one recipient is Janet, from Penn Valley, who preferred her last name not be used.
"She has Trump signs in her yard and that she had filed a police report with the Lower Merion Police. Janet said the officers were unable to pursue the matter without video, but as the letter came through the USPS, there is no video to speak of," the report said.
The report said those who got letters had displayed Trump signs in their yards.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
James Dobson, an icon in teaching Christian standards and values, especially regarding families, has advised at least five presidential administrations on ethics and values.
The Joe Biden-Kamala Harris administration, he's suing.
It's because of the multiple anti-faith agenda items Biden and Harris are trying to force onto American citizens without the benefit of legislation or congressional action.
One of the plans would radically, and falsely, insist that denying children access to transgender body mutilations be considered child abuse, which then could be used against the parents' custody of their own children.
The case, filed in federal court in Texas, is targeting the Biden-Harris scheme of wanting to change something, and simply rewriting federal regulations to accommodation their own personal wishes.
Dobson is founder of the James Dobson Family Institute and the host of the "Family Talk" radio program.
The action cites the Biden-Harris ideology that employers and their insurance programs are required to cover abortion and gender-transition services through the changes to Department of Health and Human Services and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission rules.
Then there's a new EEOC rule that takes a congressional act, the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, and insists that employers pay for abortions, and finally, the there are the Biden-Harris demands that workers "use false pronouns inconsistent with an individual's biological sex and grant access to single-sex spaces by members of the opposite sex."
The Biden-Harris rule changes all are in pursuit of the regime's two primary agenda points: promoting transgenderism including body mutilations on young children, and abortion for all.
The conflict has been developing since before Biden and Harris took office, when WND reported on Dobson's description of Biden's advocacy for transgenderism as "lunacy."
"Where is the outrage in response to this lunacy? Joe Biden appears to be under the very mistaken impression that teaching our children the truth about biological reality constitutes discrimination," he wrote on his website. "He couldn't be more wrong, and his distorted view is equally alarming. Indeed, world-renowned Swedish psychiatrist Dr. Christopher Gillberg has said that pediatric transition is 'possibly one of the greatest scandals in medical history.'"
He said leading children "down a path toward social and medical 'transition' is not compassionate – it's an act of cruelty! "
An announcement from Dobson's organization, through President Joe Waresak, confirmed the Dr. James Dobson Family Institute and an association of Christian employers filed a lawsuit challenging the Biden-Harris administration's new regulations that force employers to violate their religiously held convictions regarding the sanctity of human life and human sexuality."
The announcement confirmed, "At its most basic level, this is a spiritual battle of good versus evil. The Biden-Harris EEOC and HHS agencies are attempting to force ministries and businesses to bow down to their wicked and radicalized agenda of promoting the killing of unborn children and the perversion of God's design for human sexuality—created in His image as male and female. As a Christian organization, we cannot remain silent against such blatant attacks that target our sacred religious convictions."
The complaint is supported by a declaration from PublicSquare, a values-driven commerce ecosystem with over 5 million registered consumers.
The case in federal court in the Northern District of Texas, "seeks to protect religious freedoms and Christian business practices against government mandates recently imposed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)."
The Institute "encourages and teaches biblically based principles for families while promoting the sanctity and dignity of all human life."
Dr. Owen Strachan, senior director at JDFI, said, "This radicalized immoral movement often speaks in the dulcet tones of tolerance and inclusivity concerning public morality; it often seeks to bind society to its vision and punish anyone who dares dissent with severe consequences.
"This is evident in HHS's regulation requiring employer health plan coverage of abortion and so-called gender-affirming care, as well as in the EEOC's regulation requiring employer accommodation of abortion and immoral infertility treatments, and its enforcement guidance requiring employers to grant access to bathrooms and other single-sex spaces to those of the opposite sex.
"Such rules crush the liberty that aligns with the order of creation as defined by God and reflected in nature."
The Democrat regime in Washington is attempting "to force JDFI, PublicSquare, and other Christian-based ministries and businesses to violate our religiously based biblical values and moral conscience."
The case calls out the leftists for their "regulation" under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act to demand abortion coverage.
Further, the administration's HHS agenda includes cover "termination of pregnancy" under the "sex" nondiscrimination requirements. That agency also is demanding "gender-affirming care" that includes mutilating surgeries on children that leave them sterile for life.
Studies have shown that while transgenderism often is promoted for children by the false claims that it reduces the incidence of suicide or attempts, the opposite actually is true.
Then there's the Biden-Harris demands that employers "affirm" workers who are pursuing the nonscientific ideology that males can become females. Actually, that cannot happen as being male or female is embedded in the human body down to the DNA level.
The lawsuit charges the Biden-Harris scheme has deliberately foreclosed "any moral option in the marketplace for employers with traditional Christian values such as JDFI and other Christian-based ministries or businesses."
Dobson's radio ministry is heard on more than 1,300 radio outlets and his program has an audience of half a million weekly.
Dobson, who has advised a long list of presidents before the Biden-Harris administration, has authored more than 70 books on his area of expertise, and WND has reported when he previously suggested that Biden be informed on what Thanksgiving is.
Thank came not long ago when Biden issued a Thanksgiving address and completely ignored God.
"Sadly, someone apparently needs to teach this fact to President Joe Biden, too. He issued a Thanksgiving proclamation that didn't mention God at all. Instead, Biden suggested the day's purpose was to thank America for our blessings. This is not true. The purpose is for America to honor and thank God. This is not a minor distinction," the ministry statement said at the time.
"America, like all nations of the earth, will eventually end. But God will never 'end.' Interestingly, the only other administration to omit God from its Thanksgiving proclamations was the Obama/Biden administration," the comment said.
Dobson has been called by secular publications the nation's "most influential evangelical leader," and he also founded the prominent Family Research Council in the 1980s.
His books have sold millions of copies under titles including "Dare to Discipline," "The Strong-Willed Child," "Bringing Up Boys," "Bringing up Girls," "When God Doesn't Make Sense" and more.
Ironically, on that same holiday, it was President Donald Trump whose statement on the holiday thanked God.
He said Americans give thanks to "Almighty God" for "His many blessings including our families, our friends, our neighbors, and this extraordinary country that we all call home."
He said:
I want to wish everyone a very Happy Thanksgiving today. As we gather with our loved ones, we give thanks to Almighty God for His many blessings including our families, our friends, our neighbors and this extraordinary country that we all call home.
We also send our deep gratitude to all of the patriots serving our nation in uniform this Thanksgiving including members of the U.S. armed forces. the heroes of Border Patrol and law enforcement and ICE and everybody that works so hard to preserve our system and our country and working to defend our southern border and our police and first responders in communities all across America.
This is a difficult time for our country, but do not lose heart or lose hope because by the time we celebrate next Thanksgiving our nation will be well on its way to being stronger, safer more prosperous, and greater than ever before.
Once again, Happy Thanksgiving and God bless you all.
More recently, Dobson issued a statement warning Americans of Biden's plan to destroy the nation's sovereignty.
His warning is that the U.N.'s World Health Organization "wants complete control of your mind and body," and Biden is willing to help.
"I am writing you today to warn of an imminent and real threat to the sovereignty of our nation. Two of our founding fathers, President George Washington and President Thomas Jefferson, counseled America against forming misaligned alliances with foreign entities—especially those who do not share our allegiance to the principles that formed our republic," he said.
"Yet, the Biden administration is on the verge of doing just that by turning our keys of self-governance over to the World Health Organization. And, mark my word, if America gives up its sovereign rule as a nation, we could well lose our sweet land of liberty and effectively forsake every generation that has fought and died for it. God help us if we let this happen on our watch."
The case seeks a court ruling that the regulations and "interpretations" actually are in violation of the law and Constitution.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Bill Clinton is making a presidential race TV-ad appearance on behalf of Republican candidate President Donald Trump.
It might not be willingly, but it still uses his words and his voice to unleash some serious criticism of the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris border catastrophe.
The Democrat duo in the White House now, of course, trashed literally dozens of Trump's border security measures as soon as they took office.
The result was predictable: Millions of illegal aliens including many criminals arrived at the U.S. southern border and simply walked into the country.
Millions of those illegals now are flooding America's schools, taking American jobs, and demanding cash assistance from taxpayer-funded programs.
One of the major problems has been the many criminals among the illegal aliens, and their impact on America, which includes a number of high-profile homicides.
Clinton's comments skewered the Biden-Harris regime.
"You had a case in Georgia not very long ago," he states. "They made an ad about, about, uh, a young woman who had been killed by an immigrant. Yeah, well, if they'd all been properly vetted that probably wouldn't have happened. But if they all are properly vetted, that doesn't happen.
Trump then confirms, "I'm Donald J. Trump and I approved this message."
One of the major agenda points of the Biden-Harris team has been that they want illegal aliens allowed into the nation without any sort of "vetting" process, which has become the de facto Democrat policy for the southern border by now.
Social media commenters didn't hold back, with:
"Dems make Trump ads for FREE."
"Bill just effectively endorsed Donald J. Trump."
And, "Sounds like he's voting for Trump!"
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The Flathead Warming Center, a facility in Kalispell, Montana, intended to provide lifesaving warmth to homeless and needy, has been ordered shut down by city officials.
It's because they got complaints from residents, sometimes not even in the neighborhood of the center, about the presence of homeless.
But center officials, who opened with the full permission of the town after meeting all requirements, now are challenging that order as unconstitutional.
Kalispell, in fact, experiences cold weather, especially during the December-February time frame. Below zero readings are not at all unusual, and during those winter months the mercury sometimes hits as low as minus-30, extremely dangerous for those without protection. Frostbite can hit within minutes.
It is the Institute for Justice that has come alongside the Center to go to court, with a federal lawsuit against the town.
"Across 106 pages, the lawsuit spells out how the city violated the Center's constitutional rights by revoking its conditional use permit. With freezing temperatures just days away, the lawsuit asks the court for an emergency order to keep the Center open while the legal battle unfolds, ensuring that those most vulnerable are not left out in the cold," the institute explained.
"Kalispell's decision to shut down the Flathead Warming Center without citing it for breaking any law is not just heartless – it's unconstitutional," said Jeff Rowes, senior attorney at the Institute for Justice.
"The Center has a vested property right to continue serving the homeless, and the city is scapegoating the Center because it doesn't want to deal with the realities of homelessness. Shutting down the Warming Center is needlessly cruel and illegal, especially when the city is resorting to baseless accusations to try to justify its unconstitutional actions."
The permit was revoked "following complaints from residents about the presence of homeless individuals in the area. However, the Warming Center has never been cited for violating any laws, and its permit to operate was granted in full compliance with the city's zoning rules. Many of the complaints occurred miles from the Center. The lawsuit argues that the city has trumped up accusations that the Center lied on its 2020 permit application – accusations that are baseless and only brought up because the city had no legal justification to shut the Center down," the IJ explained.
"Winter is coming fast, and for many people in our community, the warming center is the only thing standing between them and the deadly cold," said Tonya Horn, executive director of the Flathead Warming Center. "The city is treating us like we're the problem, but we're part of the solution. We provide a safe, warm place for people to stay in an emergency. Without us, they have nowhere else to go. It's inhumane to shut us down just as temperatures are about to plummet."
The lawsuit charges the city with violations of both the state and U.S. Constitutions.
"The government can't act as judge, jury, and prosecutor to strip the Center of its property rights, just because it doesn't like what an owner is doing," added IJ Attorney Christie Hebert. "Kalispell is scapegoating the Warming Center for serving the homeless when it should be supporting its mission. Shutting down the Center won't make the homeless disappear—it will only make the problem worse."
At issue immediately is a request for an emergency temporary restraining order to keep the Center open while the lawsuit progresses.