This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A leaked memo from the Aspen Skiing Company, which runs the Aspen Mountain ski resort, several other slopes near the exclusive enclave for the rich in Colorado's mountains, and multiple motels and restaurants, explains its views of Americans' election of President-elect Donald Trump – as a failure.

Further, the memo insists that perhaps more needs to be done to push the leftist agenda.

"Clearly, the approach of trying to model, speak aggressively, and 'teach' others is not sufficient," it warned in a memo to employees.

The comments were reported in the Substack column for Glenn K. Beaton, who said the ski company, owned by the Crown family of Chicago, now has joined "The Resistance."

That's a term used for opponents of Trump's Make America Great Again agenda who have pledged to do what they can to oppose the president during his coming four years in office.

Trump, in fact, won both the popular vote – by a wide margin – and the Electoral College – by a landslide – last week and is to be inaugurated on Jan. 20.

Beaton explained, "Your correspondent has reviewed a memo labelled 'For Internal Distribution Only' from the CEO of the company that owns and operates the skiing operations at Aspen and Snowmass (referred to locally as 'SkiCo'). It's a doozy."

He pointed out "SkiCo" during Trump's first term had opposed his enforcement of immigration laws, since they were "un-American" and "coincidentally … impacted SkiCo's supply of low-paid workers."

So the comments weren't a surprise, but were "worth noting, especially if you happen to be one of their customers," the report said.

In it, a company official complains that voters picked "a vision that can be viewed as openly at odds with some of the values [SkiCo] stands for."

Those, he specified, are, "Equality, democracy, civility, compassion, tolerance, sustainability, open-mindedness, gratitude, freedom, integrity, and justice."

"In short, in the public opinion of the CEO of SkiCo, the election represents a triumph of the opposite of all that. It represents a triumph of inequality, anti-democracy, incivility, unsustainability, close-mindedness, ingratitude, tyranny, and injustice," the report said.

"He fails to explain how an open election, in which a candidate won a majority of both the people and the Electoral College, is anti-democratic. Perhaps he meant anti-Democrat."

And, the report notes, there was the condemnation of "half the country with whose votes he disagrees are intolerant."

It noted that the company "does enjoy numerous leases of Forest Service lands owned by the government."

The point of the memo, the report said is that "the operator of Aspen and Snowmass considers you persona non grata if you're in the half+ of the country that voted for Donald Trump."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Kamala Harris lost the 2024 presidential election in a landslide, with President-elect Donald Trump getting 312 Electoral College votes to her 226.

He even won the popular vote – by many millions.

But in the aftermath of the disaster for Democrats, analysts are suggesting one factor played a role in the counts where she performed: Voter ID requirements.

The trend attracted the attention of Elon Musk:

It was a Daily Caller report that explained Harris won 19 states, and 18 of those "don't require voters to show photo identification to vote."

The details are from the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Trump also won two states that lack such requirements.

The report said 36 states require "some form" of ID to cast a ballot. Of those 36, 12 do not require photo ID.

It's an issue because of the fact the noncitizens have been documented to have voted in American elections, a crime.

But with automatic voter registration programs in many locations, and the fact that the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris administration opened the southern border to millions and millions of illegal aliens, including criminals and terrorists, the dispute is becoming more and more critical to America.

The report explained 12 of the 19 states Harris won, California, Oregon, New Mexico, Minnesota, Illinois, Maine, Vermont, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Hawaii and Maryland – have no ID requirements.

Five other states she won request ID, but a photo ID is not required: Colorado, Washington, Delaware, Connecticut and Virginia.

The report said in three of those states, Delaware, Connecticut and Virginia, voters without ID may sign an affidavit and cast a ballot.

New Hampshire, which voted for Harris, has a plan allowing voters to cast a ballot, but they must sign an affidavit and then return it.

In Rhode Island, no-ID voters can cast provisional ballots and their signature then must be matched.

Nevada and Pennsylvania are the only no-ID states that Harris lost.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Despite a landslide victory for Donald Trump and his "Make America Great Again" agenda last week, a ferocious battle has suddenly broken out in the U.S. Senate over who will be the chamber's new leader, with some saying outgoing Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is trying to thwart the plans of the president-elect.

"What the hell is going on in the U.S. Senate?" Tucker Carlson is asking on X. "Hours after Donald Trump wins the most conclusive mandate in 40 years, Mitch McConnell engineers a coup against his agenda by calling early leadership elections in the Senate.

"Two of the three candidates hate Trump and what he ran on. One of them, John Cornyn, is an angry liberal whose politics are indistinguishable from Liz Cheney's. The election is Wednesday, it's by secret ballot, and it will determine whether or not the new administration succeeds. Rick Scott of Florida is the only candidate who agrees with Donald Trump. Call your senator and demand a public endorsement of Rick Scott. Don't let McConnell get away with it again."

Besides Scott and Cornyn, the other senator whose name is in the mix for majority leader is John Thune of South Dakota.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A new video has appeared online featuring President-elect Donald Trump and his new plan to attack and end Washington "corruption" by dismantling the "Deep State."

Primary is his intent to reissue his executive order from 2020 that provides presidential authority "to remove government employees" that actually are "rogue bureaucrats."

"We will clean out all of the corrupt actors in our national security and intelligence apparatus," he said, as those organizations now appear to be targeting Christians, conservatives, and other perceived enemies.

A report at Conservative Brief noted his plan includes executive orders, reforms, and even structural changes inside government agency operations.

It emphasizes openness and responsibility.

Under the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris administration, there were numerous instances of government actions apparently being weaponized against critics of the leftist agenda those two pushed onto Americans.

Especially Trump, who was targeted multiple times by court cases in which the facts were so manipulated that the weaponization appeared obvious, such as charges against him for his handling of government documents after his first presidency.

Joe Biden had, in fact, mishandled boxes and boxes of government documents from his time as senator and vice president, yet no charges were brought against him.

Further, part of the program was a state case against him over his business operations. A leftist judge ruled he was guilty of fraud and announced a fine of nearly half a billion dollars – for actions that the supposed "victims" said in court they lost no money, and in fact, would be happy to do business with Trump again.

Business experts told the court that Trump's dealings were standard in the industry – to no avail.

Trump also cited the need to reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act courts, which allow spying on Americans.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The 2024 election was held in America in the shadow of months, even years, of Democrats making wild claims about how democracy would die under a Donald Trump presidency.

How he'd never leave office, how he'd become a dictator, how he'd use the government and military against his political enemies, much like the Democrats weaponized government against him when they were in office.

But an expert is pointing out that the election actually provided a new period of protection for one of the critical components of America's representative government, which actually is a republic.

The looming threat to that "democracy" actually was Democrat plans to destroy the Supreme Court in its present form, and establish something that rubber-stamps leftist ideologies at will.

Democrats had proposed "packing" the court with more leftist justices to provide a Democrat majority, and other changes. Even dissolving it.

"The election means that court-packing schemes are now effectively scuttled despite the support of Democratic senators like Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D., R.I.). Given Kamala Harris's reported support, the Supreme Court dodged one of the greatest threats to its integrity in its history," explained constitutional expert Jonathan Turley.

"In this way, the election may prove the key moment in ending one of the most threatening periods of the court's existence. With the loss of the control of the Senate, the push for new limits on the court and calls for investigations of conservative justices will subside for now."

The election, especially the new Republican majority in the Senate, means "the court will remain unchanged institutionally for at least a decade," he said.

Leftists have been enraged in recent years over the several decisions, including the one by the court that the faulty Roe v. Wade case that created out of thin air the federal "right" to an abortion was wrongly decided.

The decision returned regulation of the nation's lucrative abortion industry to the states.

Turley explained, "The expectation is that Associate Justice Clarence Thomas could use this perfect time to retire and ensure that his seat will be filled with a fellow conservative jurist. Justice Samuel Alito may also consider this a good time for a safe harbor departure. They have a couple of years before they reach the redline for nominations before the next election."

He said the election results' impact on the law also will "be pronounced."

"A younger generation will grow up in a country where the voters of each state are allowed to determine what limits to place on abortions. Likewise, gun rights and religious rights will continue to be robustly protected. The checks on the administrative state are also likely to be strengthened. Pushes for wealth taxes and other measures will likely receive an even more skeptical court," he said.

He noted liberals previously had pushed for leftist Sonia Sotomayor to retire, giving way for a younger leftist replacement, and he opposed that idea.

But that effort, along with the "end the filibuster" campaign, he said, likely ended "around 2:30 am on Tuesday night."

He pointed out that the three justices previously appointed by Trump "are extraordinary jurists who have already created considerable legacies."

The left will continue to abuse Trump nominees during confirmation hearings, as happened for his previous choices, "but they will have a reliable Senate majority for confirmation," he said.

"In this way, the election may prove the key moment in ending one of the most threatening periods of the court's existence. With the loss of the control of the Senate, the push for new limits on the court and calls for investigations of conservative justices will subside for now," he said.

The "rage" among media and academia, however, will only likely grow.

They probably will "become more activist and aggressive" since voters declined to follow their agenda, instead choosing to "reject panic politics and radical agendas."

He said for how, the Supreme Court "will remain the key stabilizing institution in the most successful constitutional system in history."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

In U.S. elections, all the rhetoric in the world cannot defeat the actual numbers recording the vote.

And 2024's result, with President-elect Donald Trump set to become the 47th chief executive of the U.S. in January while Vice President Kamala Harris goes home, reveals a stark trend.

D-exit, as one report labeled it.

Or departures from the Democratic Party.

It was the Evening Standard in the United Kingdom that noted that Harris, the Democrat, got less support from a long list of typically Democrat-supporting groups, than previous Democrat candidates.

Trump, the Republican, took those votes.

The report noted Harris got 54% of the votes from women, but that was down from the 57% Joe Biden got.

And while Harris led among black voters, her numbers were down from previous Democrat campaigns.

In swing state North Carolina, for example, one in five black men supported Trump, double what Trump had gotten in the 2020 election.

Further, Trump's support within the Hispanic demographic was up more than 10 points since then.

"Trump has gained 18 points more support from male Latino voters than he did in 2020," the report noted.

Among "younger" voters, Democrat support had been at the 61% level. For Harris, it was only 46%.

It is a report from Just the News that suggested the D-exit label for the movement.

The report noted, "Donald Trump pulled off the most improbable comeback in American political history Tuesday night, securing a likely return trip to the White House by beating back a relentless tide of media, Big Tech, and Democrat opposition that stretched from the courthouse to the social media sphere."

This result, the report noted, came after years of Democrat and media lawfare and attacks, as he was "impeached and acquitted twice, indicted four times, facing two assassination attempts and enduring an avalanche of lawfare unparalleled in the nation's history."

But the bigger shock, the report said, was how "he peeled away long-rooted constituencies from the Democrat Party."

"The electoral movement may soon be known as D-Exit, the American equivalent of Great Britain's Brexit departure from the European Union as black males, Hispanic voters, and young voters showed up more strongly from Trump and less fervently for Harris compared to Joe Biden or Barack Obama. Arabs and Muslims also underperformed for Harris," Just the News reported.

"The shifts were small but compelling, crumbling a coalition born in the Kennedy-Johnson era and key to the Obama-Biden dynasty that dominated 12 of the last 16 years."

The shifts could bring even more radical results in the future, should the trends continue, the report noted, as Trump cut the Democrat margin for victory in New York "one of America's darkest blue states," by one-half.

And Trump removed the "battleground state" status for Florida, the scene of the 2020 fight over hanging chads, completely.

Republicans also won the Senate and were poised to retain the majority in the House, though multiple races still were outstanding.

"Perhaps most painful of all to blue America, Trump was in a position to win the popular vote, something Democrats have long used as a cudgel to delegitimize earlier GOP victories, including Trump's in 2016," the report said.

Trump was winning the popular vote 51% to 47.5%, or 72 million votes to 67 million.

Just the News quoted Mark Penn, a strategist behind the Clinton political machine, "The Trump edge is turning into a Trump trifecta. It looks like despite a good effort in a short period, Harris is falling short, especially with young people and turnout in core urban areas. Black and especially Latino voters showed some shifts."

Trump's "new coalition," he said, resulted because Trump talked "directly to constituencies Republicans often ignored in the past, and that Democrats long took for granted. He did it by inviting recovering Democrats or stubborn independents to his big stage: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Elon Musk, ex-Rep and presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard, and podcaster extraordinaire Joe Rogan to name a few."

Just the News reported Trump "went to places like the Bronx and Manhattan's Madison Square Garden in New York to signal he wanted to be all Americans' president. And (while) Democrats talked about ethereal ideological terms like ESG, CRT, and DEI, Trump talked about the kitchen table, the grocery cart, and the gas tank."

Even the Democrats' "switcheroo" when they dumped Joe Biden and adopted Kamala Harris didn't make a difference.

"Trump chose the issues of insecurity, inflation, and insanity and Democrats offered few specifics to counter. In the end, Trump's prior record of economic growth in his first term seemed preferable to Harris' vagaries," the report said.

Then in victory, Trump "didn't needle Democrats, rather he offered a magnanimous call for unity in a long-divided nation. He said he believed he had engineered a 'historic realignment for citizens of all backgrounds.'"

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

When Democrats at the White House and in the Department of Justice assembled part of their lawfare campaign against President Donald Trump, a coordinated legal barrage involving multiple jurisdictions, many civil counts and a long list of alleged criminal actions, in one situation they simply picked a private lawyer and told him to go to it.

Since then Jack Smith repeatedly has assaulted Trump with claims of criminal actions, even to the point of making an attempt to work around a recent Supreme Court ruling that Trump has immunity for some acts by charging that Trump was acting "as an individual" while in office.

One court already has ruled that he was not properly appointed, and threw out the case he brought in that jurisdiction.

Now that fight is pending before the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The American Center for Law and Justice reveals it has filed a friend-of-the-court brief that calls for Smith's disqualification from his legal campaign against Trump.

"We have fought back against Jack Smith's unlawful prosecutions before. We filed an amicus brief at the Supreme Court, urging the high court to recognize that presidents are entitled to immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts in office. The Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution's structure entitles the president to presumptive immunity from prosecution for official acts. In that case, Justice Thomas also wrote a scathing concurring opinion in which he questioned the validity of Jack Smith's appointment as special counsel: 'If this unprecedented prosecution is to proceed, it must be conducted by someone duly authorized to do so by the American people,'" the legal team explained.

It was in a Florida case that Judge Aileen Cannonruled Smith was improperly appointed. She then dismissed it, but Smith has gone back to court demanding that the charges be restored.

At that time, the ACLJ argued, "We welcome Judge Cannon's decision limiting the attorney general's authority to appoint a private citizen who has not been confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Such appointments must go through the confirmation process."

Cannon's ruling now is pending before the 11 Circuit, and the ACLJ explained he was never confirmed by Congress.

The brief makes several arguments, including that as special counsel, Smith is a principal officer of the United States, "which would require presidential appointment and Senate confirmation."

"Unlike inferior officers, principal officers must undergo presidential nomination and Senate confirmation – a process Smith has not completed."

The filing said that's because Smith "can only be removed for good cause, not at will," which limits the attorney general's authority, and he lacks meaningful supervision. Further, he has broad decision-making authority.

"Because of the level of authority that he has been given, special counsel Smith could only have been appointed by the president. He was not. Merely having a nominal superior does not automatically make someone an inferior officer, especially given the extensive independence granted to Smith."

Further, the ACLJ explained that Smith has been unable to identify "any statutory authority" that would allow AG Merrick Garland to hand him the power he says he has.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

As Americans cast their ballots in this year's presidential election, vote integrity is becoming an increasingly significant worry for voters, especially as a win for the Democrats could literally dissolve the U.S. border and any opposition from that point on.

The Biden administration's approach to the U.S. border, particularly under the stewardship of "Border Czar" Vice President Kamala Harris, seems to follow a consistent pattern – flood the country with undocumented migrants, and make those undocumented migrants dependent on the Democratic Party through benefits and easy means to gaining legal status to stay in the U.S.

Importantly, illegal immigration benefits the Democrat Party by skewing the U.S. Census which counts all "persons" living in the U.S.; whether they are U.S. citizens, green card holders, or undocumented migrants. Those numbers determine congressional seats and electoral votes.

According to commentary from Lora Reis of the Heritage Foundation, Democrat-run states are gaining congressional seats by welcoming and harboring illegal migrants.

"A state can gain extra congressional districts and representation in Congress thanks to the presence of a large population that isn't legally allowed to vote," Reis said, "Since the number of congressional seats is limited to 435, this additional representation comes at the expense of other states."

Reis noted this carries over into the Electoral College, which allocates each state with votes equal to the number of senators and representatives the state has in its congressional delegation – which can become a deciding factor in a presidential election.

During an interview with Tucker Carlson in early October, Elon Musk said if Trump loses this election, it will be the last meaningful election for the U.S. because Democrats are wanting to have a one-party majority, and are flooding swing states with illegal migrants to do it.

"My view is that, if Trump doesn't win this election, it's the last election that we're gonna have … The Dem machine … has been bringing in so many illegals … they're transporting large numbers of illegals to swing states … and there are triple digit increases in illegals to all the swing states, and in some cases it's like 700% over the last three years," Musk said.

Musk added those illegals who are allowed to stay are fast-tracked through the green card process, making them eligible to become a U.S. citizen after five years, and a legal voter beholden to the Democrat Party thereafter, even if their social values don't match.

"When they do so, they vote overwhelmingly Democrat … their top priority is getting their friends and family also to the United States, and the Dems also issue all these programs, sort of hand-outs essentially, that make them beholden to the Democrat Party. So they vote Dem," Musk said.

Musk said he predicts if there is another four years of a Democrat administration, they will legalize so many illegal aliens the next election will no longer have any swing states, and the U.S. will become a single-party country, similar to what is seen in California where Democrats make up two-thirds of the state's legislature.

The integrity of U.S. elections have come under fire since the much contested 2020 presidential election. Some states have introduced measures to curb voter fraud, which includes removing voters who have died or moved out of state, while others have signed new laws to make it significantly easier for illegal aliens to vote.

Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbot announced on X that Texas had removed over 1 million ineligible voters from the state's voter registration.

Just days ago, the United States Supreme Court approved Virginia's bid to stop people who are not U.S. citizens from voting in this year's election. The state began purging voter registrations in early August, removing over 1,600 names by using data from the Department of Motor Vehicles to identify those who are not U.S. citizens.

The decision was, however, not supported by the liberal Justices – Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson – with all three opposing the voter roll purge after the measure was initially blocked by a federal judge, according to the Associated Press.

Meanwhile, California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom recently signed a bill into law that will prevent local governments from asking voters for identification at the voting polls. According to Newsweek, California is one of 14 states that do not require I.D. to vote in elections, and has essentially become a one-party state. To maintain this chokehold on California, the Democrats are making it easier for illegal aliens to vote in hopes it will be able to remove Republican strongholds within the state, like Huntington Beach.

Reports are now beginning to surface of instances where groups of non-English speaking "citizens" are being escorted to the front of two-hour early voting lines, some showing up without valid I.D., and are being walked through the voting process by translators. Eyewitnesses have said they heard these translators saying they would change names on ballots if the voter's details didn't match what was listed.

In Arizona, officials found over 10,000 illegal aliens were using the exact same Social Security number, and used this to vote in the presidential election in 2020.

On social media, a video of a Haitian migrant is going viral after he had allegedly been made a U.S. citizen within a matter of months, and was able to cast a vote for Kamala Harris in Georgia.

Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen said he discovered evidence that thousands of illegal aliens, have been registered to vote on Alabama's voter rolls by the Biden administration.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

'As patriarchal structures continue to evolve, women and girls in sport are experiencing new forms of discrimination based on their sex. One glaring example is opening the female category of sports to males, further undermining their access to equal opportunities and the right to participate in safety, dignity, and fairness

Led by the work of the administration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, the transgender ideology has exploded in recent years.

A decade ago the issue hardly was known: Now it engulfs nightly newscasts and online publications.

It's an ideological battle that pits a small minority of individuals with gender dysphoria against the majority of the population.

But now there's new documentation of the huge impact of men, or boys, competing in events created for women or girls.

And "winning."

It is in a report from CBN News that the details are available.

It cited statistics from the United Nations showing that males have won nearly 900 medals when they compete against women or girls.

The report is called "Violence Against Women and Girls in Sports" and reveals more than 600 female athletes missed medaling 890 times because boys or men finished ahead of them.

"The replacement of the female sports category with a mixed-sex category has resulted in an increasing number of female athletes losing opportunities, including medals when competing against males," according to the report.

CBN explained the report also documents how Reem Alsalem, a U.N. special rapporteur on violence against women, informed the assembly that males in women's sports have "created higher instances of sexual harassment, assault, and voyeurism not only in competitions but in locker rooms and bathrooms."

Alsalem said, "As patriarchal structures continue to evolve, women and girls in sports are experiencing new forms of discrimination based on their sex. One glaring example is opening the female category of sports to males, further undermining their access to equal opportunities and the right to participate in safety, dignity, and fairness."

CBN documented its reporting about injuries suffered by girls and women who encountered males in their competitions. And there has been a multitude of lawsuits over the issue.

The report noted, "San Jose State player Brooke Slusser has joined in a lawsuit against the NCAA in recent weeks claiming she had to share a court, locker room, and even a room on overnight trips with her teammate Blaire Fleming without having ever been told that Fleming was a biological male."

By now, teams representing Southern Utah, Boise State, Wyoming, and Utah State all have refused to play against San Jose State, because of the presence of Fleming, a male, on the women's team.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, says Vice President Kamala Harris is lying about her stance on Israel, saying while Joe Biden "is a puppet," Harris is actually a "true believer" on hard-left, anti-Israel positions.

Cruz appeared on "Sunday Morning Futures" with Maria Bartiromo on the Fox Business Network, as Bartiromo noted that "Kamala Harris has two completely different messages when it comes to the war on Israel."

She explained that when Harris is in Pennsylvania talking to Jewish voters, the Democrat stresses she's going to make sure Israel has the right to defend itself. But when in Michigan, Harris tells voters she's going to ensure there's a ceasefire and the hostages taken by Hamas terrorists are released.

"Kamala Harris is lying to people in Pennsylvania. And we know that because she's not just some random person off the street. She's been the sitting vice president for four years. And Kamala Harris and Joe Biden have been the single most anti-Israel administration this country has ever seen.

"It's interesting when she did a '60 Minutes' interview she was asked who's the biggest enemy America has, and she came back with Iran, which is a very good answer. And bizarrely enough, '60 Minutes' didn't follow with the obvious response of, 'Well then why have you given them $100 billion? Why do you allow them today to sell 2 million barrels a day of oil? Why are you funding Iran, and Iran provides 90% of the funding and 90% of the funding to Hezbollah?' They didn't follow up with that question.

"But her record has been clear that if, God forbid, Kamala Harris is president, I think it gets much, much worse for Israel. Joe Biden's a puppet. He doesn't know is going on. He's barely aware of what's surrounding him. Kamala Harris is a true believer. I have served with her since the day she was elected to the Senate. She is hard left. Her voting record is to the left of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. That ain't easy.

"I served with Bernie and Elizabeth, there's not much room to their left. And Kamala Harris' voting record is virtually identical to my opponent Colin Allred. Colin Allred is Kamala Harris. They are both hard-left, open-border, anti-Israel radicals who are desperately trying to cover up their record. They are hiding in Joe Biden's basement together. And they're counting on millions and millions of dollars from George Soros to try to convince the American people their voting record is different than it was.

In his own close Senate race against Allred, Cruz lamented how Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has not given "a penny" to help Cruz win reelection.

"We are on our own, and we are in the middle of the single most expensive Senate race in the entire country," Cruz said. "Chuck Schumer has been explicit I'm his No. 1 target, and Chuck Schumer and George Soros, they are spending more than $100 million dollars trying to beat me. … The Washington swamp doesn't support me.

He then urged viewers to help him out financially with just two days before Election Day.

"Please go to tedcruz.org right now so we can fight back. We're going to win in Texas but we need your help to win. If you are in Texas on Election Day, please, please, please come out and vote. Bring your friends, bring your family, bring anyone you can. This is all about turnout at this stage."