This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Evidence 'he believed he did not have to abide by classification and document handling regulations'

A new report confirms that there was a "security risk" that developed when materials during Barack Obama's term in the White House were sent to Joe Biden's private and personal email account.

Biden, of course, was found later to have concealed classified government documents in piles of paperwork in his offices and the garage at his home, but never was charged for the violations of federal law.

A new report at Just the News explains the information included "briefing memos, sensitive foreign conversations, " "subjects and times for White House Situation Room meetings" and other "fallout from leaked National Security Agency intercepts."

The details come from a recent set of emails released by the National Archives.

According to the report, "Security experts and lawmakers, who reviewed the records, said they were disturbed by the nonchalant transmission of sensitive government information to Biden's insecure private email accounts and believed it put national security at risk."

Of course, Hillary Clinton, the Democrats' failed 2016 presidential candidate, was embroiled in her own email scandal just years earlier, when she set up a private server in her home and sent all sorts of government documents to the unsecured location.

"The new set of emails from Joe Biden's time as Vice President are very troubling and are more evidence that Biden believed he did not have to abide by classification and document handling regulations," former CIA analyst and former Trump National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz confirmed to Just the News.

The report said hundreds of pages of emails dated from 2011 to 2015 were given to Just the News and a law firm, Southeastern Legal Foundation, in a Freedom of Information Act case.

The report explained, "They build on prior evidence that then-Vice President Biden was using the pseudonymous accounts for sensitive discussions with close advisors about official business ranging from domestic politics to sensitive foreign policy matters."

Whether any documents were classified hadn't been determined yet, the report said.

"Just like the classified documents Biden stored in his garage and home office, he again proved he didn't care about document security," Fleitz charged. "Biden's use of a gmail alias email address for work-related emails (robinware45@gmail.com) put sensitive government emails on gmail servers where they could easily have been hacked."

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., chairs the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations and explained to the publication he'll get to the bottom of the scandal, and find out if laws were broken.

""Over the last several years, Sen. Grassley and I pressed the Biden White House and the National Archives for information and records on Joe Biden's use of pseudonyms and personal email addresses for official government business," he said. "The Biden administration failed to respond to those requests."

It is the Federal Records Act that governs the disposition of government documents of all sorts.

Chris Piehota, of the FBI, explained, "Government policy says you are not supposed to do business outside the government system," and that's for a reason.

"Those systems are not considered secure because they can be attacked from the outside or monitored by the provider. Providers can see anything. These are insecure systems for government business," he said

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

'The idea itself is the right one and we definitely support it'

WASHINGTON – Russian President Vladimir Putin signaled Thursday he is open to a ceasefire in Ukraine. This comes as American and Ukrainian representatives met earlier this week in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, to discuss a possible peace deal.

Putin made his remarks in Moscow, where American officials currently are meeting with Russians to discuss a peace agreement which Ukrainians have already greenlit.

"The idea itself is the right one, and we definitely support it," Putin said of a potential break in fighting. He also said there are "questions" that need to be discussed before Russia signs on. "I think that we need to talk them through with our American colleagues and partners."

Those questions include the logistics of monitoring the ceasefire, and whether Ukraine will be allowed to stockpile arms during the break in fighting. These things will take a great deal of time to sort out. Still, this first public acknowledgment of a ceasefire by Putin is a major step toward United States President Donald Trump's ultimate goal – stopping the killing on both sides.

Kremlin officials previously had said they would respond to ceasefire talks only after meeting bilaterally with Americans. They wanted more details on the Trump administration's plan for a compromise.

The New York Times and other outlets are reporting that Putin is expected to meet with Steve Witkoff later Thursday. Witkoff – Mr. Trump's Middle East envoy – was instrumental in negotiating the ongoing ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. It is the administration's hope that he can work similar magic in brokering this deal in Eastern Europe.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., is basically "a Palestinian" at this point, due to the Jewish senator's current positions on the Israel-Hamas war.

"Schumer is a Palestinian as far as I'm concerned. He's become a Palestinian," Trump said. "He used to be Jewish. He's not Jewish anymore. He's a Palestinian."

Trump was speaking during an Oval Office meeting with Irish Prime Minister Micheal Martin.

The president also indicated Palestinians will not be displaced from the Gaza Strip while the war zone is rebuilt.

"No one is expelling anyone from Gaza," he said.

The prime minister of Ireland's visit to the White House coincides with the upcoming St. Patrick's Day holiday.

Mr. Martin acknowledged the close ties between the United States and Ireland, even as Mr. Trump – with Martin right next to him – told reporters the country is one of the European Union members who has not been fair to America on trade.

In the same meeting, Mr. Trump was asked if he has plans to respond to the latest round of tariffs imposed by the E.U.

"Of course I will respond," he told reporters.

Tariffs remain top of mind abroad and across North America, as the president walked back 50% tariffs on Canada which were meant to go into effect Wednesday. This came after hours-long phone meetings with top-level officials from both countries.

For now, tariffs remain one of Trump's sharpest negotiating tactics. It remains to be seen whether whiplash over how quickly they are implemented and removed will wear out their usefulness.

WATCH:

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

'The [Iranian] regime is very unlikely EVER going to give up on that objective'

Nuclear watchdogs have long been concerned about Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60%, and more recently, in 2023, the International Atomic Energy Agency found uranium particles at Iran's Fordo facility enriched to 83.7 %, which is dangerously close to weapons-grade.

WorldNetDaily spoke to former CIA officer and Iran expert Clare Lopez. As of Feb. 8, noted Lopez, Iran has 274.8 kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60%. That's a significant 92.5 kilogram increase in its stockpile since November 2023. If enriched to approximately 90% or more, that would provide enough highly enriched uranium to create six nuclear weapons, according to the IAEA.

Unfortunately, according to the Institute for Science and International Security, "The IAEA's ability to detect diversion of [Iran's] nuclear materials, equipment, and other capabilities to undeclared facilities remains greatly diminished."

All things considered, Lopez is gravely concerned. Thus she is thankful that President Donald Trump has "committed to reestablishing the maximum pressure campaign against the Iranian regime," to include enforcing sanctions and other economic measures. "By shutting down the Iranian oil export sector, it will cut off access to the international financial system," she explained.

Trump has not ruled out military involvement, according to a letter recently sent to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. While Lopez expects the president to be open to negotiation of a nuclear deal as he has stated, she believes allowing Iran to ultimately possess "a deliverable nuclear weapon" is not something Trump would condone.

Following the letter, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected nuclear talks with the United States, suggesting "such negotiations aren't aimed at solving issues."

But in a statement posted on X on March 9, Iran's U.N. mission said: "If the objective of negotiations is to address concerns vis-à-vis any potential militarization of Iran's nuclear program, such discussions may be subject to consideration."

"The problem," Lopez said, "is that the [Iranian] regime is very unlikely ever going to give up on that objective, especially while on the cusp of deliverable nuclear weapons as we speak." What's more, she warned, Iran likely already has "a handful of warheads."

Last month, she wrote, "At a January 31 press briefing, Deputy Director of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI)'s Washington, D.C., office, Alireza Jafarzadeh, provided alarming new information about the Iranian regime's race to fit nuclear warheads to its arsenal of solid-fuel Ghaem-100 ballistic missiles." The hold-up, she told WND, is that "attaching a warhead to the nose cone of a missile is not an easy thing. It's not like screwing a lid on a jar."

On Oct. 1, 2024, Iran launched approximately 180 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted and shot down by Israeli air defenses with the help of U.S. forces. Lopez warned, "These ballistic missiles were nuclear capable, but they were not armed with nuclear warheads at the time." Thus she is extremely concerned over the potential devastation that could occur should Iran be able to build missiles tipped with nuclear warheads.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

'We get attacked every day, but this was done with a lot of resources. Either a large, coordinated group and/or a country is involved'

The popular social media site X, run by billionaire Elon Musk, is the victim of a "massive cyberattack" Monday.

"There was (still is) a massive cyberattack against X," Elon Musk said in a post at 1:25 p.m. Eastern.

"We get attacked every day, but this was done with a lot of resources. Either a large, coordinated group and/or a country is involved. Tracing …"

Worldwide users of the site formerly known as Twitter, on Monday have been experiencing intermittent outages.

Monday afternoon, Musk told Larry Kudlow on Fox Business: "We're not sure exactly what happened but there was a massive cyber attack to try to bring down the X system with IP addresses originating in the Ukraine area."

Reports confirmed posts were not loading for users in the United States, United Kingdom, France and India over various time frames.

A report from Newsweek said the hacking group called "Dark Storm Team" reportedly was claiming responsibility for the DD0S attack.

Dark Storm is known, according to the report, "for its sophisticated cyber warfare attacks and successful hacks of high-security systems."

The report explained, "According to Orange Cyberdefense, the group was formed in 2023 and has a pro-Palestinian focus."

It recently had promised cyberattacks on various sites involving NATO countries, Israel and nations that support Israel.

Cloudflare said the obvious signs of a DDoS attack, which involves simultaneously directly millions of queries to one website, are "when a website or service suddenly becomes slow or unavailable."

The Independent described the outage as "major and global."

The report said, "More than 40,000 users in the U.S. reported having issues at the peak, according to the monitoring website Down Detector. Elon Musk, who bought X in 2022, didn't mention the outage on his own account. He posted earlier on Monday that X is 'the top source for news on Earth.'"

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Hamas advocates and other terror-supporting students on American campuses, if they are foreign, are in trouble now.

Officials in Washington have announced that the first visa has been revoked for an "alien who was previously cited for criminal behavior in connection with Hamas-supporting disruptions."

The target was identified as a "university student."

Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed the agenda, "The United States has zero tolerance for foreign visitors who support terrorists."

The administration of President Donald Trump has identified a crackdown on foreign malign influences, and terror support, as two of the nation's problems on which it is working

A report at the Gateway Pundit said, "This marks the first such case since President Trump's order to expel foreign Hamas supporters studying in the U.S. on student visas."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Social media is delivering a verdict of "treason," not just from one commenter, but many, after the revelation by Tulsi Gabbard, President Donald Trump's director of national intelligence, that the Joe Biden administration allowed some 4,000 people from Asia to use an ISIS-linked network to illegally enter the U.S.

Of that crowd, about 100 were arrested, but only eight eventually were deported or jailed, she confirmed.

On a visit to the nation's southern border, which was left wide open during the Biden regime but now is closed down under the Trump administration, she confirmed that the 4,000 from central Asia came to the U.S. during Biden's tenure using an "ISIS-affiliated network."

That would include "hundreds of known terrorists and [people] associated with known terrorists," she said.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Representative tried to publicly bully President Trump during address to Congress

For one member of the Democrat party in the U.S. House, which already has been condemned as "pathetic" and "petty" for members' outrageous actions during President Donald Trump's address to a joint session of Congress this week, it's getting worse.

With a 224-198 vote on Thursday, the House censured Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, for his outlandish stunt in which he stood up while Trump was speaking and badgered him.

The Washington Examiner said 10 Democrats joined Republicans in approving the resolution that came from Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Wash.

The report listed the 10 as Reps. Ami Bera, D-Colo., Ed Case, D-Hawaii, Jim Costa, D-Calif., Laura Gillen, D-Calif., Jim Himes, D-Conn., Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, Jared Moskowitz, D-Fla., Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., and Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y.

Progressives in the Democrat minority "joined Green when his censure resolution was being read, singing 'We Shall Overcome,' while lawmakers could be seen in heated conversations with one another on the House floor," the report said.

Green had promised he would stage his stunt all over again.

Green also has promised to create articles of impeachment against Trump, a move which would be destined for failure.

Democrats, in fact, when they were the House majority during Trump's first term, fabricated impeachment claims against him twice, including one after he had left office, voting for them each time only to see their agenda collapse in the Senate.

While Green staged the most flagrant stunt protesting Trump's speech, other Democrats held signs like "Resist" and such.

The party as a whole has been ridiculed widely for members' refusal to applaud various Americans who were highlighted in Trump's speech, including a teen accepted into West Point, and a young girl murdered by illegal aliens, for whom Trump renamed a wildlife refuge, and such.

A censure is a public reprimand from the full House.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

An announcement from the Department of Justice has confirmed that it is dropping a Joe Biden-era lawsuit that tried to force abortion on physicians and nurses in Idaho.

Biden claimed the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act overrides state life protections and demanded that pro-life states such as Idaho allow abortions if they were required to "stabilize a woman in a medical condition."

The Idaho law already permitted an abortion "on the subjective, good-faith medical judgment of a doctor who believes the life of the mother is threatened," the report explained.

Idaho's attorney general, Raúl Labrador, has argued in a court hearing the Biden lawsuit that the two laws had no conflict, and eventually a Boise hospital network sued as the administration of President Donald Trump was taking over, expecting the case would be dropped.

Claims had included that women had to be airlifted out of the state for abortion.

Kelsey Pritchard, of SBA Pro-Life America, told the Daily Signal, "The PR stunts that the abortion lobby and abortion advocates pull, with things like that and furthering the misinformation on women's ability to get care; that is what is, actually needing women to be confused and doctors to be confused, because the laws are pretty straightforward."

At the same time, B. Lynn Winmill, who was given the job as a judge by Bill Clinton, issued a temporary restraining order that blocks Idaho's Defense of Life Act form being enforced, pending a hearing.

"Of course, this is from an activist Clinton-appointed judge, but at the end of the day, Democrat abortion extremism cost the Democrats the election, and Biden's weaponization of the federal government is over, and the will of the people on this is very clear," Pritchard told the publication.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

After President Trump's speech to a joint session of Congress Tuesday night, establishment media tried to push back on a specific claim about experiments on "transgender" mice funded by American taxpayers.

In response, the White House hit back at the president's detractors.

"The Fake News losers at CNN immediately tried to fact check [the president's statement], but President Trump was right (as usual)," noted White House staff in a press release.