This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Revision while Joe Biden was in office found positions created overestimated by 818,000
The commissioner of Labor Statistics was fired on Friday after the agency released a dismal jobs report based on President Donald Trump's economy, a report that multiple observers said was faulty.
It was the same operation that during Joe Biden's time in the White House overestimated the number of jobs created at that time, by 818,000, and then had to admit its blunders.
"I was just informed that our Country's 'Jobs Numbers' are being produced by a Biden Appointee, Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of Labor Statistics, who faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory," Trump announced.
"This is the same Bureau of Labor Statistics that overstated the Jobs Growth in March 2024 by approximately 818,000 and, then again, right before the 2024 Presidential Election, in August and September, by 112,000.:
Trump's statement continued, "These were Records — No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes. McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months. Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative. The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP' despite a Fed that also plays games, this time with Interest Rates, where they lowered them twice, and substantially, just before the Presidential Election, I assume in the hopes of getting 'Kamala' elected – How did that work out? Jerome 'Too Late' Powell should also be put 'out to pasture.' Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
In fact, during the Biden regime, the agency had to revise its job creation numbers downward by 818,000, a massive change that had, before being corrected, implied that jobs were booming under Biden when they were not.
It was the largest downward adjustment in 15 years.
At the Gateway Pundit was the comment, "President Trump on Friday fired the Biden-appointed Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) after she 'faked' the jobs numbers before the 2024 election to try to boost Kamala Harris's chances of a victory."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
President Donald Trump's effort to help the American economy, specifically the American taxpayers, has taken to new heights his anti-regulation agenda from his first term.
Then, he promised to remove two rules for every new one imposed by the government. Actually, commentator Paul Bedard in the Washington Examiner confirmed he reached the plateau of eliminating four rules for every new one.
Now that's in the distance past.
"With little fanfare, the Trump administration has gone on a regulation-cutting binge, eliminating Biden- and Obama-era rules while slashing the bureaucracy built to impose costly restrictions on Wall Street and Main Street," the report said.
"Early indications from a key regulation watcher confirm that President Donald Trump is not just making good on a campaign promise to cut 10 regulations for every new one his team proposes, but has also paused issuing new regulations."
The confirmation comes from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which monitors that paperwork and its impact on American industry, American consumers, American business.
Clyde Wayne Crews, a spokesman, now is calling it the "Unrule."
"What we're witnessing is the rise of the 'Unrule,' a revolt against the machinery of the administrative state."
He shared with Bedard that some of the new "rules" that are appearing actually are "reversals, delays, withdrawals" of previously created mandates.
That, he said, is "a government-wide recognition that certain, perhaps most, regulations are not merely unjustified but actively harmful."
Some are huge, like the Trump administration's decision to pull back Joe Biden's Environmental Protection Agency demand for "clean" vehicles, considered unrealistic by experts.
Further, Trump's efforts have included the widely publicized effort to reduce the number of federal employees – actually eliminating the posts in which federal workers often spent their careers creating new rules.
"Agencies are being defunded, downsized, and in some cases shuttered. Guidance documents and sub-regulatory decrees — once used to bypass notice-and-comment rulemaking — are now in the crosshairs as well," explained Crews.
He said Congress, which had been urged to take these very actions, should learn.
"When the bureaucracy gets put in time out, nobody but the vast industry surrounding it misses it, and the economy, jobs, and public health and safety get a boost," he said.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Two of Barack Obama's appointees, John Brennan, who was at the CIA, and James Clapper, who was for a time the director of national intelligence, have gone public defending themselves against accusations they engaged in a "treasonous conspiracy" against then-candidate and now-President Donald Trump.
They have faced a barrage of accusations since current DNI Tulsi Gabbard and other officials in the current administration began releasing the previously secret documentation of the scheme that Democrats assembled and implemented against Trump.
It reportedly was triggered by Hillary Clinton's concern that voters knew about her scandalous behavior in putting government secrets on a private computer server in her home. Evidence shows she organized a campaign to try, falsely, to link Trump to Russia.
Documents released only this week confirm that the FBI and CIA aided in the scheme, and there's evidence that the highest officials in the country, from Obama's Oval Office on down, likely were involved.
Now Brennan and Clapper have claimed in statements they submitted to the New York Times that they rejected that they engaged in a "treasonous conspiracy" to undermine Trump.
A report at the Washington Examiner said, "While the pair admitted that some critics say the investigation could have been handled better," they claim years-long reviews have confirmed their perspective on the story.
However, there has been advice to the participants of the scheme to "lawyer up," as multiple individuals from Obama down are under congressional and Department of Justice investigation, and some already have been making arrangements with defense counsel.
The two claimed, in the Times, "That is patently false. In making those allegations, they seek to rewrite history. We want to set the record straight and, in doing so, sound a warning."
However, the reams of documents that already have been released confirm that that anti-Trump campaign was created, was implemented, and actually was intended to undermine the duly elected president of the United States.
"Clapper and Brennan also misleadingly claimed that Justice Department special counsel John Durham, who was appointed during Trump's first term, found no evidence of an 'Obama administration conspiracy against Mr. Trump.' Durham found significant wrongdoing at the start of the Russia investigation," the report charged.
They claim, still, that every "serious" review of the situation found the Russians "conducted an influence campaign intended to help Mr. Trump win the 2016 election." Actually, newly revealed documents show that the intel community found such Russian influence to be negligible and have no impact, until Obama ordered the reports rewritten, apparently using Clinton campaign propaganda, to insist that Trump was benefited.
"Clapper and Brennan also sought to defend themselves on three issues: the discredited Steele dossier, whether their intelligence assessment on Russia made a judgment about Russian interference in the election, and alleged 'collusion' between the Trump campaign and Russia," the report said.
Their written statements also ran head-first into other issues, the report said.
They claimed the Steele dossier, assembled by a former British agent, played no significant role in the intelligence assessments at the time. But the fact is documents released by CIA chief John Ratcliff and Gabbard confirm Brennan insisted that the false statements be presented with any intel assessment.
Further, they claimed there was no mention of collusion in the intel report.
However, reports at the time did "conclude that Russia aspired to help Trump win, and Gabbard and Ratcliffe have declassified records that suggest Brennan and Clapper did not have credible evidence to support that conclusion."
They claim that it now is the Trump administration that is doing a "calculated distortion of intelligence."
Ratcliffe has confirmed Brennan and Clapper could face charges.
"We're gonna continue to share the intelligence that would support the ability of our Department of Justice to make fair and just, bring fair and justice claims against those who have perpetrated this hoax against the American people and this stain on our country," he explained.
Gabbard has referred Obama and others to the DOJ for investigation and possible prosecution.
"There is irrefutable evidence that details how President Barack Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew that was false. The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact," she charged.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., has asked the federal Office of Special Counsel for an investigation of special counsel Jack Smith, the leftist who was assigned to orchestrate a large part of the Democrats' lawfare against President Donald Trump.
His cases went away when Trump was elected to his second term, but they involved a wild range of accusations including the J6 protests at the Capitol, election actions and more.
Cotton wrote, "I write requesting the Office of Special Counsel to investigate whether Jack Smith, Special Counsel for Attorney General Merrick Garland, unlawfully took political actions to influence the 2024 election to harm then-candidate President Donald Trump. As the Office of the Special Counsel is tasked with ensuring federal employees aren't conducting partisan political activity under the guise of their federal employment, you're well situated to determine whether Smith broke the law."
His letter is to Acting Special Counsel Jamieson Greer in the United States Office of Special Counsel, where he added, "Many of Smith's legal actions seem to have no rationale except for an attempt to affect the 2024 election results—actions that would violate federal law."
A report at TownHall explained that Smith "did his best to throw President Donald Trump in federal prison during the 2024 presidential election."
He's also the man "behind the FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago."
The report warned he "may soon get a taste of his own medicine."
Smith, of course, is just one of many officials from the Barack Obama and Joe Biden administrations who now is coming under investigation, by the DOJ, Congress and more, for things like the Russiagate conspiracy that apparently was sparked by Hillary Clinton and carried out on the orders of Barack Obama.
Smith left the Department of Justice in January, just days before Trump took office again.
"Special Counsel Smith pushed for an out-of-the-ordinary, rushed trial for President Trump, with jury selection to begin just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses. No other case of this magnitude and complexity would come to trial this quickly," Cotton pointed out. "Special Counsel Smith tried to bypass the normal process and go right to the Supreme Court, but gave no reason why his abnormal request should be granted. The real reason was to get a quick ruling to damage Trump before the election—a partisan, unlawful action."
Cotton pointed out Smith was not at fault alone, as one of his procedural moves came just before the election, a brief of 165 pages, four times longer than the normal limit.
"This was breathlessly covered by the press in a way to damage Trump," he said. "Why? To help Kamala and hurt Trump. There is no other reason. These actions were not standard, necessary, or justified. They were the actions of a political actor masquerading as a public official. That's why I've asked this unprecedented interference in the 2024 election be immediately investigated by OSC."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Saying he's had a "fantastic run," Glenn Kessler, the longtime so-called "fact-checker" for the Washington Post, announced Monday he's finally leaving the newspaper after receiving a buyout.
"After more than 27 years at The Washington Post, including almost 15 as The Fact Checker, I will be leaving on July 31, having taken a buyout," Kessler said on LinkedIn.
"Much as I would have liked to keep scrutinizing politicians in Washington, especially in this era, the financial considerations were impossible to dismiss."
Kessler indicated he now plans to write books.
"This year I completed a novel about a love triangle set in 1920s Dutch East Indies (colonial Indonesia), based on State Department cables I found in the National Archives," he explained. "I have an idea for a nonfiction project and am open to freelance or consulting opportunities."
Breitbart News noted: "Many of you know Kessler was merely a left-wing op-ed writer packaged as an 'objective' voice," as it posted a list of "his worst offenses over the years."
In May, the New York Post described Kessler as a "propaganda mill."
"If there was such a thing as shame anymore, the Washington Post's pompous 'Fact Checker' column would close up shop," the editorial board of the New York Post wrote.
"New revelations in 'Original Sin,' a book about President Joe Biden's decline, show how the White House covered up the obvious — and propaganda outlets like the Fact Checker shamed any media that broke ranks.
"Take Biden's wandering off from a group of world leaders at last June's D-Day celebrations: The New York Post's front page read 'MEANDER IN CHIEF,' which sent Fact Checker writer Glenn Kessler into a fit of apoplexy: "'Cheapfake' Biden videos enrapture right-wing media, but deeply mislead' was his headline. Kessler gave us 'Four Pinocchios' for promoting a 'false narrative.'"
Another critic of Kessler's work is Fox News contributor Steve Milloy, who said he's "had numerous occasions to fact check departing long-time WaPo 'fact checker.'"
As for what's next for the fact-checker position at the Washington Post, Kessler said: "I'm not sure. As many people at The Post know, I tried to arrange a short-term contract that would have given the editors time to find a worthy successor and allow me to train him or her. I didn't want The Post to have a gap in fact-checking coverage during this fraught period in U.S. history. But we couldn't work out an agreement. (Okay, so I buried the lede.)
"In 2018, when the Fact Checker team was compiling a database of more than 30,000 Trump claims, I told the New York Times that 'I have the best job in journalism.' I still believe that, and I'm sorry to leave without a replacement lined up. But it's the right time for me. I hope The Post finds someone to carry on this important project."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
John Brennan, who was Barack Obama's CIA chief, has been confirmed through declassified government documents to have been an essential part of a grand conspiracy by Democrats against Donald Trump, then a candidate for president and even while he was president, according to a constitutional expert.
Jonathan Turley, who has testified as an expert on the Constitution before Congress, even representing members in those disputes, now concludes that Brennan's own words ""will remain an indictment of his role in history."
The scheme targeting Trump, launched by Obama and aided by Brennan as well as then-FBI head James Comey and DNI James Clapper, falsely alleged a Trump campaign conspiracy with Russia, among other false claims made in Democrat fabrications like the Steele dossier.
"Back in 2016 and in the years that followed, this must have seemed to Brennan like just another CIA operation with 'plausible deniability.' After all, he knew that he had the Biden administration and the media watching his back. Of course, the public would ultimately reject these hit jobs, not only reelecting Trump but also giving Republicans full control of Congress," Turley explained.
"Brennan may be protected from perjury charges by the five-year statute of limitations. However, he is likely to be called again before Congress and asked the same questions. Even if he is not criminally charged, his past statements will remain an indictment of his role in history," he explained. " What is now clear is that high-level officials dismissed intelligence and evidence in order to create and spread the Russian collusion conspiracy as widely as they could. Their politicization of intelligence was raw and wrong. It succeeded only because it was an 'all-hands-on-deck' effort, from the Obama White House to the CIA, the FBI, and the media."
He noted that evidence now shows Obama, Brennan and others "knew in advance about the planned political hit job," which in fact was twice-failed Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton's conspiracy to launch rumors linking Trump to Russia in order to divert the public's attention from her own email scandal, where she put government secrets on a private, unsecured server in her home.
The scheme involved altering official government documents that concluded Russia essentially was a nonplayer in the election, to the false conclusion that it colluded with Trump's campaign.
"Keep in mind that Obama's ordering of the new assessment was occurring at the very end of his term. There was a rush to complete the report before Trump took office after defeating Hillary Clinton. The effort seeded the Russian collusion hoax that would consume much of Trump's first term," Turley said.
In interviews, he noted, "Brennan continued to deny prior knowledge" of the Democrat-funded Steele dossier with its false allegations against Trump.
Brennan even accused Trump of 'reason, in a televised statement.
"Whatever professional integrity Brennan had left after that, he set it aside in joining more than 50 former intelligence officials in signing a now-infamous letter dismissing the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 presidential election as likely 'Russian disinformation.' Joining him on the letter was former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who says that he has now 'lawyered up' in anticipation of potential criminal allegations. The laptop, of course, was later found to be authentic and incriminating for Hunter Biden," Turley wrote.
The evidence against Brennan, and others, now comes from those declassified documents that contradict Brennan's own sworn statements to Congress.
While Brennan claimed the dossier's allegations were a minor subpoint, actually he demanded that those allegations be included in official intel community observations about Trump.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe is expecting criminal indictments against top names in Barack Obama's administration for allegedly conspiring against President Donald Trump and the American people with the Russia-collusion hoax, and he says more information is about to be declassified.
Appearing on "Sunday Morning Futures" with Maria Bartiromo on the Fox News Channel, Ratcliffe said of potential indictments, "That's why I've made the referrals [to the Justice Depatment] that I have, DNI [Tulsi] Gabbard has made referrals. We're going to continue to share the intelligence that would support the ability of our Department of Justice to … bring fair and just claims against those who have perpetrated this hoax against the American people and this stain on our country."
"There is no doubt in my mind," Ratcliffe explained, "they conspired against President Trump. They conspired against the American people. And so, I'll leave it to Pam Bondi and our Department of Justice, Kash Patel and our FBI to investigate the conspiracy to do what, and what charges that they're capable of bringing."
Ratcliffe explained there are still more disclosures about the conspiracy that will be forthcoming.
"What hasn't come out yet and what's going to come out is the underlying intelligence that I have spent the last few months making recommendations about final declassification and sent that to the Department of Justice that will come out in the John Durham Report Classified Annex," he said.
"And what that intelligence shows, Maria, is that part of this was a Hillary Clinton plan, but part of it was an FBI plan to be an accelerant to that fake Steele Dossier to those fake Russia-collusion claims by pouring oil on the fire, by amplifying the lie and burying the truth of what Hillary Clinton was up to."
Ratcliffe noted the U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi is very different from previous attorneys general in her desire to punish the culprits.
"Pam Bondi does have a strike force. It is a different Department of Justice, a different FBI, and an opportunity to look at how these people really did conspire to run a hoax, a fraud on the American people and against Donald Trump's presidency," said Ratcliffe.
"And so, coming forward, we understand that they did this but now we need to understand how they did this. And I think that's why you see the left losing their minds over this, saying, 'Why are you spending time? This is vindictive. You're going back. This is Donald Trump seeking retribution.' It's not."
"Donald Trump's election by the American people was a statement. They said to everyone, 'We know what you did to Donald Trump and we reelected him because we know this was all fake. We know it was a hoax. Now we want to understand how you did it so that it can't happen again.'
"And that's what this declassification process that we're undergoing right now, what's going on, why it's so important and why there can be accountability and preventability to prevent the same people that did it in 2016 with the Steele Dossier, with the Hunter Biden laptop in 2020 from doing it in the future."
Later in the same broadcast, former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes told Bartiromo: "There is no statute of limitations on conspiracy," adding, "This is an ongoing conspiracy. It hasn't stopped."
Ratcliffe also said the main players in the Russiagate hoax actually helped make China a serious danger to America, as they helped create the threat with their anti-Trump conspiracy.
"They put politics in front of national security," he said.
"All of these people are responsible for the threats that we're facing as a country right now, but the good news is, the good guys are in charge. And as Donald Trump has very clearly shown, we are fully capable of undoing the damage that has been done."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Alina Habba, President Donald Trump's pick to be the U.S. attorney for New Jersey, is staying in that position despite a scheme launched by a Democrat in Congress to remove her, and a failed attempt by Democrat judges in the district to do just that.
Habba, named by Trump to be the interim U.S. attorney while her nomination to take the post permanently was pending, had a limited time to remain in that status.
Democrats have been obstructing Trump's nominees in Congress, so the time period was elapsing, and she could remain if approved by the judges in the district.
But they succumbed to a lobbying campaign from Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, a Democrat from New York, and decided not to authorize Habba's continuation. So she resigned that post, Trump withdrew her permanent nomination, and she was then named acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey.
She explained on social media: "Donald J. Trump is the 47th President. Pam Bondi is the Attorney General. And I am now the Acting United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey. I don't cower to pressure. I don't answer to politics…"
WND has reported when Jeffries found himself facing accusations he's been interfering with a federal criminal case over his political agenda against Habba.
It is Jeffries who is the target of requests by multiple legal activists to the Ethics Committee for an investigation.
The development came about because he actively lobbied federal judges in the district to remove Habba from her post.
Jeffries was enraged at Habba because she charged Rep. LaMonica McIver, D-N.J., with obstructing Homeland Security agents during an altercation at an immigration facility in Newark on May 9.
McIver is heading for trial in November.
A report from Fox News explains Jeffries has made claims that Habba isn't qualified because she indicted McIver "for doing her job."
It was the Article III Project that wrote to the House Ethics committee with the explanation that Jeffries "improperly insert[ed] himself into a criminal proceeding."
"This is clear corruption by House Democrat Leader Hakeem Jeffries," the charge said.
Fifteen of the 17 judges in the district owe their jobs to Democrats, and they voted, unsuccessfully, not to have Habba stay in her post.
The complaint against Jeffries said, "A House member – particularly the House Democratic leader – who disagrees with the merits of a pending criminal case abuses his official position when he attempts to strong-arm federal judges to corruptly prejudice the ongoing criminal proceeding by firing the U.S. attorney for the purely political reason of protecting a partisan House colleague."
McIver and two other members of Congress claimed to be doing "oversight" when they physically clashed with federal law enforcement officers.
WND reported McIver physically handled a federal agent at the time.
The judges also now are accused of violating the code of conduct for federal judges.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
President Donald Trump won a huge precedent at the Supreme Court only months ago, establishing immunity for the occupant of the president's office on a number of issues.
Now, he candidly has admitted, his victory probably is helping Barack Obama.
Obama, along with his henchmen James Clapper, James Comey, John Brennan, possibly even Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, are under several investigations for misleading the American public, suppressing an intel community conclusion that Russia was no big deal during the 2016 election, and instead rewriting reports to make it look bad for Trump.
That was the election the conspirators fabricated a Trump campaign-Russia collusion conspiracy theory for which there was no evidence.
Now that government records are being declassified that confirm it was made up, there's rampant speculation about charges, including perjury, lying to Congress and more.
A reporter asked Trump about that immunity ruling.
He said, "It probably helps him a lot, probably helps him a lot, the immunity ruling. But it doesn't help the people around him at all. But it probably helps him a lot. He's done criminal acts, there's no question about it, but he has immunity, and it probably helped him a lot. He owes me big. Obama owes me big!"
The Supreme Court ruled that a president as total immunity for exercising "core" constitutional powers, and presumptive immunity for actions they took as president. The ruling gave no immunity for private actions.
That immunity is required, the opinion said, to protect an "energetic," and "independent executive," willing to take "bold" actions and make unpopular decisions when needed.
All of the cases brought against Trump between his first and second terms eventually died.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released evidence that Obama fabricated and led the Russia Collusion hoax to harm Trump as candidate and then president-elect.
Among the documents Gabbard declassified was a December 2016 presidential briefing confirming Obama knew the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was a hoax.
Trump, at that time, ripped Obama, Clinton, Biden, Clapper, Comey and others, and called Obama the "ringleader."
"Barack Hussein Obama is the ringleader. Hillary Clinton was right there with him, and so was Sleepy Joe Biden, and so were the rest of them: Comey, Clapper, the whole group," Trump charged.
Gabbard has confirmed those actions, by those people, are under DOJ review now.
Trump charged Obama with leading a "coup."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Only hours after President Donald Trump issued a warning to entertainers on "The View" about their anti-White House rants, one of those entertainers has announced the show will be broadcast yet on Friday, but then is on "hiatus."
A report at Fox had documented how co-host Joy Behar had been told that her show could be next on the chopping block after her latest tirade against Trump.
CBS recently called a halt to the leftist "The Late Show" work by Stephen Colbert, amid reports the show was losing millions of dollars a year.
That was on Wednesday.
On Thursday morning, Behar confirmed the shutdown.
"We only have one more show after this," she said.
Behar had pushed her politics regarding the call from Trump for Barack Obama to be criminally investigated, which apparently already is happening. The issue is over government evidence that the Obama administration manufactured claims that Trump's 2016 campaign was colluding with Russia, a claim unsupported by evidence.
Behar ranted, "First of all, who tried to overthrow the government on Jan. 6? Who was that again? That was not Obama. The thing about him is he's so jealous of Obama, because Obama is everything that he is not: Trim, smart, handsome, happily married, and can sing Al Green's song 'Let's Stay Together' better than Al Green. And Trump cannot stand it. It's driving him crazy. Green is not a good color."
White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers cited the show's ratings and suggested that it could be taken off the air.
"Joy Behar is an irrelevant loser suffering from a severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's no surprise that The View's ratings hit an all-time low last year. She should self-reflect on her own jealousy of President Trump's historic popularity before her show is the next to be pulled off-air," Rogers said.
An official representing the show, a longtime enclave of leftist arguments, said it was "up in total viewers" compared to last season.
At the Media Research Center's Newsbusters, there was a report on the show's "pretty incendiary and heinous accusations against President Trump."
Those included "everything from 'crimes against humanity' to 'treason.' The White House had apparently had enough, because in a statement to Fox News on Wednesday, the administration called out the show and warned them to straighten up before they get 'pulled off-air.'"
Newsbusters explained, "FCC Chairman Brendan Carr also hinted that the administration could be scrutinizing 'The View.'"
At the Wrap were details on Carr's comments.
He hinted it is "entirely possible" the long-running ABC show has some "issues" worth looking into.
"But again, stepping back [to view] this broader dynamic, once President Trump has exposed these media gatekeepers and smashed this facade, there's a lot of consequences. I think the consequences of it aren't quite finished," Carr said.
He cited a recent episode where the show had to be stopped four times to read legal notices to try to avoid liability.
"So I'm not surprised to hear people say that their ratings are struggling."
The report said Carr was referring to a November 2024 episode in which "The View" co-hosts had to issue four "legal notes" during a show, after bashing several of Trump's cabinet picks."