This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Only one day after an archived comment from the late Jeffrey Epstein about Hillary Clinton doing the "naughties with Vince," apparently former White House counsel Vince Foster, appeared, President Donald Trump confirmed he's asking Attorney General Pam Bondi to review Bill Clinton's "involvement" with the convicted sex offender.

Democrats since Trump re-entered the White House have been demanding the release of everything Epstein, suggesting that they include damning information about Trump.

Of course, the Biden administration had access to those items for years, and never was able to dig out anything that it could use against Trump. While Trump was acquainted with Epstein, he cut off the relationship years before the sex offender's lifestyle was known. In fact, one Epstein case insider testified under oath that she was not aware of misbehaviors by Trump.

The Democrats' attacks on Trump have been systemwide:

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Lawyers for the BBC have written to President Donald Trump's legal team, and BBC chief Samir Shah has penned a separate, and personal, letter to the White House, apologizing for the network's edit of the president's words that falsely suggested his responsibility for the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol.

"Lawyers for the BBC have written to President Trump's legal team in response to a letter received on Sunday," a BBC spokesperson has confirmed. "BBC chair Samir Shah has separately sent a personal letter to the White House making clear to President Trump that he and the corporation are sorry for the edit of the president's speech on 6 January 2021, which featured in the programme."

The BBC's Panorama program about the events that day took comments from Trump, omitted his statement about supporters protesting "peacefully" and linked the comments with remarks an hour apart, "to make it appear like one long statement," according to a report from Fox News.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

President Donald Trump has blasted Democrats for using the "Jeffrey Epstein Hoax" to try to distract Americans from their campaign of "viciously closing our Country," through their weeks-long refusal to approve continuing resolution funding for federal employees and programs.

Democrats repeatedly have tried to smear Trump with an association with the late, convicted sex offender.

Trump knew Epstein, but they had a falling out years ago, long before many of the antics that have been ascribed to Epstein developed.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

There long have been concerns that the Clinton Foundation, run by politicians Bill and Hillary Clinton and their daughter, Chelsea, operated as a pay-to-play scheme, taking in "donations" from corporations and foreign countries that wanted to gain influence.

After all, Bill Clinton was president from 1993 to 2001, and Hillary Clinton was secretary of state for Barack Obama. During that time, specifically, donations surged, while after she was out of office and out of power, they plunged.

Now a new report from Just the News, which repeatedly has investigated the foundation and its cash flow, notes that Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI chief Kash Patel have given to Congress "a new cache of documents showing how Bill and Hillary Clinton's foundation collected donations from foreign and domestic interests seeking influence."

The documentation now raises anew concerns that such evidence was kept from federal prosecutors who tried to investigate pay-to-play allegations against the former first family a decade ago, the report explained.

The evidence, given recently to the Senate Judiciary Committee, details multiple instances where foreigners, "and even a U.S. defense contractor," sought to "curry favor with the Clintons through donations to their family charity."

Some of the evidence previously had been cited by whistleblowers who charged it was concealed during a corruption investigation in 2015 by the U.S. attorney's office in Little Rock, Arkansas, an effort that shortly later was shut down by Obama and his Department of Justice.

"The documents will make clear that there was an effort 'to obstruct legitimate inquiries into the foundation by blocking real investigation by line-level FBI agents and DOJ field prosecutors and keeping them from following the money,' said one official directly familiar with the documents," the report said.

There had been at least three attempts to review the "pay-to-play" scandal involving the Clinton Foundation but all were ordered closed by the Obama administration.

The new evidence was described as showing how lower-level FBI agents and some prosecutors deprived the decision-makers in those investigations of information about the foundation.

The scandal even encompasses Hillary Clinton's decision to keep government secrets, while she was secretary of state, on a private email server in her home, as she was accused of doing that "so she could hide her Clinton Foundation pay-to-play," according to a report.

According to emails obtained by Judicial Watch, Hillary Clinton gave preferential treatment to Clinton Foundation donors while she was secretary of state.

There was a time when the FBI was reviewing at least 19 Clinton Foundation bank accounts for campaign finance fraud, before the review was shut down.

Previously reported was the declassification of a government document confirming the efforts by the FBI and DOJ to block any review of Clinton Foundation behaviors.

It was Just the News that revealed the actions at the time, heading into the 2016 election, when the family foundation run by the Clintons solicited "contributions" and "donations" – totaling hundreds of millions of dollars – from various groups that had business pending before the federal bureaucracy, which Hillary Clinton ran.

The report explained Patel found a "bombshell" memo from 2017 that chronicled the "extensive political obstruction that career agents in three cities faced from their own bosses and the Obama Justice Department during the 2016 election as they probed whether Hillary Clinton engaged in a pay-to-play corruption scheme."

The government documents show Sally Yates, then deputy attorney general, ordered, "Shut it down!"

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Democrats, even before President Donald Trump started gaining constitutional and favorable rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court, joined other leftists in insisting that the institution must be changed, stacked with leftist ideologues, so the party can get its way whenever it wants.

While Joe Biden was in the White House and Democrats were at their peak power to weaponize the government against their political opponents, through Letitia James, Jack Smith, Fani Willis, the FBI and more, the talk fell by the wayside.

But with President Donald Trump back in the Oval Office and a few Democrat election victories in governors' races, it's back, and "with a vengeance," according to constitutional expert Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law and George Washington University.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The top two officials at the BBC, or British Broadcasting Corporation, both quit the state-funded, left-leaning media giant Sunday amid fierce pressure for deceptively editing Donald Trump's speech on Jan. 6, 2021, twisting his words to make it look like he was inciting a riot.

BBC boss Tim Davie, a 20-year veteran at the network who has been in charge for the last five years, resigned after "reflecting on the very intense personal and professional demands of managing this role over many years in these febrile times."

"Like all public organizations, the BBC is not perfect, and we must always be open, transparent and accountable," Davie added. "While not being the only reason, the current debate around BBC News has understandably contributed to my decision."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The federal government has begun investigating abuse in the H-1B visa program, which allows companies to hire foreigners at below-scale salaries after claiming there are no available American workers for the positions.

That program has been documented to have replaced tens of thousands of high-tech American workers with foreigners at lower pay.

But now the review also includes allegations that companies have not been paying even foreigners the salaries offered, thus pushing wages for Americans down, too.

The Times of India, in a nation that sends thousands of workers annually into the program in America, was fretting over the development.

It noted the U.S. Department of Labor has launched at least 175 new investigations into those potential H-1B abuses.

And there are "a bounty of concerns ranging from wage mismatch to work site location," the report said.

The report said some foreigners with advanced degrees are paid far less than what was advertised by the companies, pushing down wages for similarly situated Americans.

"This is the tip of the iceberg as other investigations found that several employers grossly flouted H-1B rules — did not notify the US Citizenship and Immigration Services when an H-1B visa holder was terminated," the report said.

According to reporting from the Blaze, the update concerned what's been called "Project Firewall."

"Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said that the Department of Labor is 'using every resource at our disposal to put a stop to H-1B abuse and protect American Jobs. Under the leadership of @POTUS, we'll continue to invest in our workforce and ensure high-skilled job opportunities go to American Workers FIRST!,'" the report said.

Virgil Bierschwale, a leading critic of H-1B visas and their impact on American workers, told Fox, "I can quickly bring that up to 32,000 companies being investigated if you have the manpower."

The abuse by companies replacing American workers with foreigners has been more and more in the news of late, and the Trump administration announced plans to have companies pay $100,000 for new H-1B visas to create an incentive to hiring Americans.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Democrats often use insults, like calling President Trump "Hitler" and his supporters "Nazis," and attacks to campaign against political opponents.

Sometimes it works, but for a city council candidate in Montana, it failed spectacularly.

It is Haley McKnight, who notoriously became famous when an expletive-filled voicemail she left for Sen. Tim Sheehy, R-Mont., came to light, who lost.

McKnight, who later claimed her rage was justified, got only 20% of the vote. There were two city council seats available and Melinda Reed got 36.5% and Ben Rigby 31.2%.

A report from Fox News said her voicemail came over the summer, after Sheehy voted with Republicans to pass Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a tax and spending package that angered McKnight and other Democrats.

WND had reported on the voicemail, a vicious verbal assault on Sheehy.

Editor's Note: Be aware of offensive language from McKnight.

On social media, commenters responded to McKnight with:

"This voicemail raises issues of potential criminal threats, harassment, and civil liabilities, especially, given McKnight's public role as a candidate."

And, "We're gonna need a bigger mental institution."

Constitutional expert Jonathan Turley, who has a book addressing the issue, "The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage," commented on the current trend among mostly leftists for "unmitigated hate speech."

McKnight hopes for Sheehy, death, cancer, more death, and yes, more death.

Turley noted in Virginia the Democratic candidate for attorney general, Jay Jones, admitted that he previously expressed a desire to kill a political opponent and his children.

McNight's rant include: "Hi, this is Haley McKnight. I'm a constituent in Helena, Montana. I just wanted to let you know that you are the most insufferable kind of coward and thief. You just stripped away health care for 17 million Americans, and I hope you're really proud of that. I hope that one day you get pancreatic cancer, and it spreads throughout your body so fast that they can't even treat you for it."

She then descended into a "litany" of insults about fertility, Sheehy's children, and threatened the senator not to "meet me on the streets.

"I hope you die in the street like a dog. One day, you're going to live to regret this. I hope that your children never forgive you. I hope that you are infertile. I hope that you manage to never get a boner ever again. You are the worst piece of s*** I have ever, ever, ever had the misfortune of looking at … God forbid that you ever meet me on the streets because I will make you regret it. F*** you. I hope you die…All that you have done since you have gotten into power is do s*** for yourself."

Turley noted that McKnight, of course, blamed "conservatives" for making public her threats.

She claimed, "I was responding to some horrible policy with some justified rage." And she blamed the senator for not responding to her call.

Sheehy spokeswoman Jack O'Brien said, "We hope Ms. McKnight gets the help she clearly needs."

She has been described as a "progressive" and records show she's donated money to a Democrat.

Despite McKnight's failure Democrats claimed victories in a handful of races this week, including for New York City mayor, where "democrat socialist" Zohran Mamdani, advocating for a number of communist action points, won election.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A stunning new report charges that Maureen Comey, a former federal prosecutor and daughter of the infamous ex-FBI chief James Comey, now under indictment for lying to Congress, once promised convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein that he would walk away from pending charges if he would implicate President Donald Trump in crimes.

It happened during Trump's first term, when Maureen Comey still was a federal prosecutor for the Department of Justice, a job she no longer holds.

Her father, of course, was one of the schemers behind the Democrats' years-long lawfare against President Trump, with roles in various cases created by Democrats to try to bring down the Republican candidate, then president.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Muslim "democrat socialist" Zohran Mamdani, the mayor-elect in New York City, took not even hours to reveal his "venom," according to an analysis of Tuesday's election of the radical candidate.

And social media was hot with claims that he's now going to try to put New Yorkers under the governance of Islamic Shariah law.

"As even Democratic partisans, such as Van Jones, noted, the calm, embracing warmth of the Mamdani who courted votes with sweet words vanished. Here, instead, was anger and a chilling combination of lies and revealing truths," explained the analysis by Hugo Gurdon in the Washington Examiner when Mamdani spoke shortly after the election.

"Mamdani gloated, 'New York will remain a city of immigrants, a city built by immigrants, powered by immigrants, and as of tonight, led by an immigrant.' Actually, 60% of the city's population is not immigrants, but he wanted to rub their faces in the takeover inflicted on them by an outsider. To them, his message was, 'Suck it up, suckers, we're in charge now,'" the analysis explained.

He noted, "Politicians tend to be somewhat triumphalist in moments of triumph. So Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani could have been forgiven for a little exaltation as he spoke to his electrified supporters after winning the New York City mayoral election."

However, the analysis pointed out how Mamdani actually was "downright sinister" in victory, "glorying not just in his achievement but in having laid low his vanquished enemies and stuck it to others besides. He took off his smiling campaign mask and revealed his venomous self."