Frank Carillo has been charged after threatening to murder Vice President Kamala Harris and others, Just the News reported. The Virginia man used an alias to post at least 19 threats against the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate to the conservative social media platform GETTR.
Carillo began his hostile tirade against Harris after President Joe Biden stepped out of the presidential race and endorsed his vice president to take his place in the campaign. "Kamala Harris needs to be put on fire alive," he wrote, according to the affidavit.
"I will do it personally if no one else does it I want her to suffer a slow agonizing death," the post said. Carillo also said that he would stab or shoot her should she get elected president in November.
Carillo threatened other officials, including Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer and FBI Director Christopher Wray. He also posted about committing violence against Muslims and illegal immigrants.
According to the New York Times, the suspect was arrested Friday and made his first court appearance Monday. If convicted, Carillo could face up to five years in prison.
Authorities say he made "4,359 posts/replies made by ‘joemadarats1’ targeting various public officials" in the course of a year. He targeted Democrats and other people like Richer, whom he believed was part of the effort to steal the 2020 presidential election from former President Donald Trump.
The FBI launched an investigation after being notified about the posts and figured out that Carillow was behind them. One of the posts said he had an AR-15 rife that was "LOCKED AND LOADED."
The FBI's search of Carillo's home turned up that model rifle and another handgun as well as several thousand rounds of ammunition. After his arrest, Carillo seemed not to grasp the gravity of his unhinged remarks.
Legal documents quoted him as saying to the FBI, "This is all over a comment, huh?" Carillo is unemployed and disabled and began posting to the account in June 2023.
If the charges are correct, Carillo was adding more fuel to the contentious and dangerous political climate. Still, the treatment of these threats further underscores the disparate way political violence is handled depending on the target.
The establishment media is covering Carillo's alleged crime with the gravity it deserves while they try to downplay the actual assassination attempt against former Trump. The GOP presidential candidate was struck in the ear with a bullet from the gun of a would-be assassin at a Pennsylvania rally on July 13, Fox News reported.
Rather than express outrage about the security failure that led to the shooting, the left-leaning publication Politico took the opportunity to compare Trump to Italian dictator Benito Mussolini. Because Trump used it as a moment to show strength and courage, Ruth Ben-Ghiat warned about the "danger" the incident presented, not in the wound to Trump's head but because it made him more popular.
"With that gesture, Trump tended to his personality cult, reassuring millions of his devoted followers that he had survived and was unbeaten — just as Mussolini did with his photo almost 100 years before. The danger is what comes next," Ben-Ghiat added.
Violence is never the answer to political rivalry, and people who engage in it deserve to be punished. Unfortunately, it seems the left doesn't agree with that when the target is someone they also happen to dislike.
Reports from sources close to the British royal family say that King Charles has not been taking his son Harry's calls since Harry published a memoir, "Spare," in 2023 that made Queen Consort Camilla Parker Bowles into a villainess.
"When Harry branded his stepmother Camilla a ‘villain’ in his book and revealed that both he and William initially begged their father not to marry her, Harry committed what Charles regards as a cardinal sin," Christopher Andersen, author of "The King," told Fox News Digital.
"No one disses Camilla in royal circles and gets away with it – not even a son of the king," Andersen said.
People magazine also reported that King Charles, who is battling an unknown form of cancer, has refused to talk to his son, who earlier renounced his royal title and moved to the United States with his wife Meghan Markle.
The pair are still called the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, but not Prince Harry and Princess Meghan, by their own choice.
People said that King Charles and Harry had a meeting in February that seemed positive, but that Harry is being told the King is "unavailable" now when he calls.
Harry's letters to his father have also gone unanswered.
King Charles does not carry a cell phone, so it's hard to know whether the calls are being intercepted unbeknownst to him.
It's possible his staff are trying to protect the King from the drama that often accompanies Harry and Meghan at a time when his health is more delicate than it has been.
Sources have also said that Harry's brother William, next in line for the throne, has taken sides with his father, making any hope for reconciliation slim.
Harry has made the issue about the lack of security provided by the Crown after he stepped down as prince, saying he wrote the book to make money for his own security detail.
Harry obviously has no love lost for his stepmother, who his beloved mother Princess Diana described as a "third person" in her marriage to then-Prince Charles.
The two carried on a long-term affair while he was married to Princess Diana, and he married Camilla a few years after she tragically died in a car accident.
But it's one thing to privately carry animosity toward a family member, however unwanted, and quite another to air one's dirty laundry for all to see like Harry did in the book.
Hunter Biden's legal troubles took a decidedly difficult turn earlier this year when he was convicted on a series of federal gun charges, and a judge in California just dealt him another blow that could impact his fate in another federal case poised for trial.
As Fox News reports, U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi, set to preside over Hunter Biden's tax trial next month, granted immunity to Hallie Biden, the widow of the defendant's late brother, in order to secure her testimony in the criminal proceedings.
It was in earlier, pre-trial proceedings that the former sister-in-law/onetime girlfriend of Hunter Biden informed federal prosecutors that she would not testify in the tax case, citing “her privilege against self-incrimination.”
At issue in the case are charges against Hunter Biden that allege that he failed to pay upwards of $1.4 million in taxes over the course of three years and that he filed false returns.
During the time at issue, the first son is said to have spent funds that could have been used to pay tax liabilities on things such as escort services, drugs, luxury vehicles, and more.
In response to her prior indication of reluctance to testify at trial, Scarsi issued an order stating that Hallie Biden must “give testimony or provide other information which she refuses to give or to provide on the basis of her privilege against self-incrimination as to all matters about which he may be interrogated in the course of these proceedings.”
Scarsi went on, “It is further ordered that no testimony or other information compelled under this order, or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or information, shall be used against Hallie Biden in any criminal case, except that she shall not be exempted by this order from prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise failing to comply with this order.”
The news that Hallie Biden will be compelled to testify in the tax trial was likely not welcomed by Hunter Biden and his legal team, particularly given her appearance on the stand in his gun case.
As the Associated Press noted at the time, Hallie Biden told jurors in a Delaware courtroom a series of damning details about Hunter Biden's drug use at the time of the alleged firearms offenses.
Hallie Biden recalled the moment she found the gun at issue in Hunter Biden's truck, explaining that she swiftly attempted to discard it without his knowledge for fear he would hurt himself or someone else.
She also testified to having found crack cocaine remnants and other drug paraphernalia in the vehicle, information jurors likely used in rendering their guilty verdict.
When asked directly if Hunter Biden had been using drugs at the time he affirmed under oath on a federal gun purchase form that he was not, Hallie Biden said, “He could have been.”
Adding to Hunter Biden's legal stress is the fact that his sentencing in the felony gun case has just been set, and it will now take place on Nov. 13, as Reuters reports.
Though federal guidelines suggest that a sentence of between 15 and 21 months in prison is a possibility, legal observers believe that the first son is unlikely to receive a term of incarceration near that length -- if any at all -- and whether his father might offer a presidential pardon in the gun case or on the tax charges during his remaining time in the White House, only time will tell.
The U.S. Postal Service's inspector general is sounding the alarm as up to 3% of campaign and election-related mail was not processed in time for the presidential primary, Just the News reported. This could mean mail-in ballots in November's general election may be delayed or not counted at all.
An internal USPS audit found that ballots cast by mail in the 2024 primaries were processed 97.01% of the time, on average. By contrast, ballots handed in at election counting centers were counted 98.17% of the time.
Several states allow voting by mail, including eight that permit all elections to be conducted that way. Deficiencies in the mail system could impact the outcome as tens of thousands of votes go missing or uncounted.
"We found that Postal Service personnel did not always comply with policy and procedures regarding all clear certifications, Election and Political Mail logs, and audit checklists In addition, we identified processes and policies that could pose a risk of delays in the processing and delivery of Election and Political Mail," the inspector general's report said.
A misdelivered ballot here or there doesn't seem like a major problem on a small scale. However, considering how many states rely on the USPS for conducting their elections, the issue could become significant.
Currently, eight states—California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia—permit full voting by mail. Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, and Wyoming permit it for smaller elections.
Idaho, Minnesota, New Jersey, and New Mexico allow for smaller jurisdictions to conduct elections mainly by mail, while Nebraska and North Dakota allow counties to choose to do so. This means even the smallest percentage of ballots cast by mail that have problems could cost candidates thousands of potential votes.
This makes a major difference when extrapolated to a nationwide presidential election. The problem is that the postal service is just not keeping up with the stringent requirements of mail-in ballots.
This came from postal workers' failure to log ballots and election mail as required by law. The report also found a "lack of management oversight and monitoring to ensure that Election Mail and Political Mail audit checklists were properly completed with accurate information."
The report highlighted 10 solutions, most of which involved improving the service they were already entrusted with providing. Two of the recommendations, including one that suggested updating postmarking procedures for more accurate dating, were partially rejected by management.
The study, conducted during the primary elections from Dec. 1, 2023, through April 1, 2024, looked at 35 delivery units and 15 mail processing facilities. The report found that "12 of 15 (80 percent) mail processing facilities did not complete all clear certifications according to policy" set in place for political mail.
It seems that the postal service is limited in what it can deliver in relation to what needs to happen when entrusted with election mail. It's unconscionable that thousands of votes would be tossed or uncounted based on postal service failures, especially when they've been identified.
However, that's one of the many inherent problems with entrusting an election to the USPS instead of in-person polling centers. Many have been warning of this since the 2020 presidential election, which saw unprecedented vote-by-mail and the questions that arose from it.
Voting by mail is sold as a way to allow more people to vote more easily. However, the postal service's inconsistencies undermine confidence in the process which undermines confidence in the outcome, and that's dangerous.
Gov. Josh Shapiro canceled his weekend fundraisers in the Hamptons days before Vice President Kamala Harris was expected to name her running mate, Fox News reported. Many believe that the Pennsylvania Democrat is on her short list of potential candidates.
The governor was scheduled for a series of fundraisers in the wealthy Long Island seaside region. One of the upscale events was dubbed a "summer soiree" featuring Shapiro as the "special guest" meant to raise money for The Next 50, a left-leaning political action group.
Shapiro's office has not released an explanation for the change announced Thursday. "The governor’s trip was planned several weeks ago and included several fundraisers for his own campaign committee," Shapiro spokesman Manuel Bonder said.
"His schedule has changed, and he is no longer traveling to the Hamptons this weekend," Bonder added. Harris is expected to announce her vice presidential pick at a rally in Philadelphia on Tuesday.
While many are enthusiastic about Shapiro, a scandal in his office could become a stumbling block to his future. The National Women’s Defense League has slammed Shapiro for his handling of a scandal involving former cabinet secretary Mike Vereb.
In September 2023, Vereb was forced to step down over claims of sexual misconduct, including unwelcome sexual advances toward an employee in Shaprio's office. The administration settled the claim for $295,000.
NWDL Director Emma Davidson Tribbs said in a statement that the governor "should have done a better job at preventing sexual harassment" and "protecting the survivor who bravely came forward." Tribbs added that the situation should give Harris pause in naming Shapiro as her pick.
Tribbs implored Harris and the Democrats "to consider the handling of past complaints of sexual harassment inside the Pennsylvania Governor’s office," the statement said. "The American people deserve to know that, if called to a higher office, Governor Shapiro will do more to ensure the safety and dignity of employees, volunteers, and constituents in his office."
Bonder dismissed those concerns about Shapiro in a statement to Fox News. "Although the Commonwealth does not comment on specific personnel matters, it takes allegations of discrimination and harassment seriously," the spokesman said.
Despite the issue raised by the NWDL, Shapiro is the most likely pick at this point, according to Axios. Shapiro canceling his fundraisers is a major indicator, but there are other indicators that point to him as her pick.
Shapiro is the governor of the Keystone State, a key battleground state Harris will need to win for its 19 Electoral College votes. He is a popular governor with a 61% approval rating, which will also raise Harris' stock in Pennsylvania.
There were also reports that Harris's vetting team met with Shapiro just the day before he pulled out of his stops in the Hamptons. The team met with others, but Shapiro is considered the top choice among experts.
Wall Street has also signaled its confidence in her pick. High-value donors were urged to send funds this week to avoid any appearance of pay-to-play should Shapiro be named vice president later.
Harris must pick someone stable and popular enough to overcome her myriad shortcomings. Shapiro may be her best bet after all, but nothing is definite until she makes her announcement next week.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ordered Iranian forces to retaliate against Israel for the strike that killed Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, Breitbart reported. The so-called "Supreme Leader" was assassinated in Tehran Wednesday.
Khamenei ordered the counterattack shortly after the political leader was killed in Iran's capital city. Three Iranian officials wishing to remain anonymous informed the New York Times about the order against the embattled nation.
In April, Iran launched more than 300 missiles that were taken out by Israel's Iron Dome defense system. Israel has not taken credit for the latest strike but notably took out the second-in-command of Hezbollah in Beirut just the day before.
The world is bracing for the possibility of escalation into an all-out war between Israel and Hezbollah. Some airlines in the U.S. have canceled service to Israel, while other nations are encouraging citizens to leave Lebanon.
Initial reports incorrectly identified the attack as an airstrike. However, a later Fox News report said that Haniyeh was killed by an explosive device that had been planted two months before Haniyeh arrived at the guesthouse where the attack occurred.
The leader was in Tehran as a guest for Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian's swearing-in on Tuesday. At around 2 a.m. local time on Wednesday, the bomb was detonated remotely in the guesthouse Haniyeh was occupying.
The device killed the leader and a bodyguard who was in the vicinity. The building, located in the northern part of Tehran, was protected by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and was used for dignitaries.
There's no word on how the device was planted and concealed all of this time. This is a black mark on the Guard as it was supposed to be a secure location and was used at times for its secret meetings.
Both Hamas and Iran are blaming Israel despite any concrete link to the Jewish State. This comes as tensions continue to rise in the region following the attack on Israel and subsequent counterstrikes against Hamas.
The State Department has yet to issue a formal statement on the matter. However, when asked about the bombing, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken denied American involvement.
"And what I can tell you is this. First, this is something we were not aware of or involved in," Blinken told the press.
"It’s very hard to speculate, and I’ve learned over many years never to speculate on the impact one event may have on something else. So I can’t tell you what this means," Blinken added.
"I can tell you that the imperative of getting a ceasefire, the importance that has for everyone, remains," Blinken said, using a phrase that typically means Israel must stand down while it's under attack. It's unclear when Iran's counterstrike could happen, if at all.
The world is closer to the brink of war than it has been for decades. The next move from any parties involved could be the catalyst for a serious worldwide conflict.
Missouri's GOP Attorney General Andrew Bailey announced a victory in a lawsuit against the Biden-Harris administration over the use of funding for a border wall, reported. Missouri and Texas sued after the administration refused to complete the project but recently obtained a court order compelling them to do so.
Bailey took to X, formerly Twitter, Tuesday to announce the victory and the fact that the administration will not appeal it. "BREAKING: I obtained a court order forcing border czar [Vice President] KamalaHarris and [President] Joe Biden to finish President [Donald] Trump’s border wall," Bailey wrote.
"They decided NOT to appeal, making our win FINAL. The rest of President Trump’s border wall is going up because of this lawsuit."
🚨BREAKING: I obtained a court order forcing border czar @KamalaHarris and @JoeBiden to finish President Trump’s border wall.
They decided NOT to appeal, making our win FINAL.
The rest of President Trump’s border wall is going up because of this lawsuit.
— Attorney General Andrew Bailey (@AGAndrewBailey) July 30, 2024
The Biden administration inherited $1.4 billion in funds from the Trump administration with the stiplation that the money "shall only be available for construction of barrier systems along the southwest border," a news release from Bailey's office explained. The Biden Administration refused to comply.
"When asked why the Biden Administration 'did not build a barrier, such as a wall, to keep migrants out,' it replied that '[i]t is not the policy of this administration' because '[w]e do not agree with the building of a wall.'" The Department of Homeland Security also refused.
They were so desperate to stop the wall project that the Biden administration called on Congress to cancel the funding altogether. "Yet when Congress did not capitulate to its demands, the Biden Administration ignored its constitutional obligations to abide by Congress’ appropriations laws and opted not to use the funding for the purpose Congress directed," Bailey's statement explained.
In response to this, Missouri and Texas sued the federal government. "Joe Biden refuses to carry out his constitutionally mandated responsibilities, so we took him to court to force him to do his job," Bailey said.
The Biden administration tried to thwart the lawsuit by denying Missouri had standing to sue. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals would ultimately decide it did and rule in favor of the plaintiffs.
This ruling comes at a time when Harris is attempting to distance herself from the open borders policies of the Biden administration. As the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Harris must contend with the destruction wrought by their unwillingness to stop it.
In March 2021, Harris was charged with finding out why so many people were attempting to cross the border in the first place, Fox News reported. However, she never made a dent in the problem and instead dug her heels into her failures.
She was asked by NBC's Lester Holt in June 2021 whether she planned to go to the U.S.-Mexico border that she was charged with securing. She ended up with one of her worst blunders. "You haven’t been to the border," Holt said to Harris.
"And I haven’t been to Europe," she replied and then laughed about it. This epitomized her devil-may-care attitude about this serious subject. Over the next several months, the border crossings would continue to shatter records as it became clear the administration had no appetite to stop it.
Thanks to the lawsuit, the Biden administration will now be forced to continue Trump's border wall. However, the best thing that could happen now would be for Trump to retake the White House and fix it himself.
Hunter Biden's attorneys claimed they "never tried to mislead" in a legal motion Sunday despite incorrect wording that cuts favorably toward their client, The Hill reported. A federal judge threatened them with sanctions after attorneys used "false statements" in an attempt to get Biden's California case tossed.
The president's son is headed for trial in California in the coming months on charges of tax evasion. Biden is accused of failing to pay his federal taxes, totaling $1.4 million, from 2016 to 2019 and of filing false returns in 2018.
He supposedly used the proceeds to fuel his hedonistic lifestyle fueled by drugs and alcohol during that time and faces misdemeanor tax charges and nine felonies. In an effort to get Biden off the hook, his attorneys claimed that Biden was never charged until U.S. Attorney David Weiss was appointed special counsel.
This was an effort to have his trial tossed based on Weiss's appointment, similar to a decision in favor of former President Donald Trump with the same rationale. The judge dismissed Trump's classified documents case in Florida after finding that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith was invalid.
U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi reprimanded Biden's legal team for their incorrect assertion about when charges were filed and said they must "show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for making false statements in the motion." Biden's attorneys responded that they "never tried to mislead" the court.
"Defense counsel, perhaps inartfully, intended this use of the word ‘charges’ to refer to the current charges brought by indictment against Mr. Biden, not the lack of any charges at all. Here, context matters," his attorneys wrote.
However, it seems clear from their own words that they meant exactly what they wrote in the filing. "As U.S. Attorney, he had years to bring whatever charges he believed were merited, but he brought no charges until after he received the Special Counsel title that he sought," the incorrectly wrote about Weiss.
The judge pointed out last week that Weiss had charged Biden before being appointed as the special counsel. The attorneys for Biden have pledged to change the wording in the motion to reflect "indictments" instead of "charges" to clarify the supposed error.
They pleaded with the court to overlook the error rather than sanction them. "Nevertheless, there is no basis on which to sanction Mr. Biden’s counsel for using that one word, which was not misleading in the context in which the two prior Informations had been repeatedly addressed with the Court," the attorneys said in the motion.
It's difficult to see how Biden's lawyers could have made such an error about whether Weiss charged him before becoming special counsel. Before he was appointed, Weiss brokered the infamous sweetheart deal with Biden, Fox News reported.
In July 2023, Biden was facing felony tax charges and a felony gun charge when Weiss offered him a deal that would include no jail time. He would be able to go through a diversion program to get the gun charge dropped and just plead guilty to the tax charges.
Biden would have gotten away with it, except that Judge Maryellen Noreika of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware declined to accept the plea deal. She called it "not standard," "different from what I normally see," and unconstitutional.
By August 2023, Weiss was named special prosecutor on Biden's case. If unintentional, this kind of oversight in the timeline by Biden's attorney would be, at the very least, quite sloppy.
Because he's the son of President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden has been able to escape the consequences of his actions for a long time. That seems to be coming to an end for him despite the best efforts of his attorneys.
The New York Times published emails on Saturday in which former President Donald Trump's chosen running mate J.D. Vance called Trump "morally reprehensible."
Vance was emailing Sophia Nelson, a former Yale Law School classmate, who is transgender, between 2014 and 2017.
Nelson apparently saved the emails and decided to leak them to the Times, which eagerly make some of them public.
Emails and text messages shared by JD Vance's former Yale Law School classmate show how the Ohio senator pivoted from being a strong opponent of Donald Trump to his running mate. Here are five of the most revealing moments in their correspondence. https://t.co/6lGMsjRULj
— The New York Times (@nytimes) July 27, 2024
The emails reveal where Vance stood at the time. Anyone who has been paying attention to Vance since that time knows he didn't start out as a Trump supporter.
Vance said that Trump was "morally reprehensible" and expressed animosity toward police and their treatment of Black people.
Nelson said that the frequent emails and texts stopped when the two had a falling out over Vance's support for a ban on transgender medical procedures for minors.
“I’m obviously outraged at Trump’s rhetoric, and I worry most of all about how welcome Muslim citizens feel in their own country," Vance wrote in 2015. "But I also think that people have always believed crazy s—… And there have always been demagogues willing to exploit the people who believe crazy s—.”
“The more white people feel like voting for trump, the more black people will suffer. I really believe that,” Vance wrote to Nelson in 2016. Another email later that year said, “He is just a bad man. A morally reprehensible human being.”
While Trump obviously had enough support to get elected in 2016, he also had many detractors who now support him, including radio host Glenn Beck and Sens. Jeb Bush (R-FL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC).
Before Trump was elected in 2016, no one knew what he would do and whether his policies would actually be conservative.
It is not difficult to imagine that Vance came around after seeing Trump's performance in his first term.
In addition, comparing Trump's tenure to Biden's has led many voters who originally felt Trump wasn't a great candidate to change their minds. Vance must be one of them.
Of course, the Times wants voters to see Vance as a politically expedient hypocrite who is willing to throw his convictions out the window for power, while at the same time ignoring the many conflicting statements of newly coronated presumptive Democrat nominee Kamala Harris regarding her running mate, both before and after she was chosen to be so.
It has been roughly two weeks since former President Donald Trump was the target of an assassination attempt at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
However, in a move that has stunned the nation, Trump has expressed his intention to soon return to the scene of that harrowing experience in order to hold another event – this time in honor of the man who was tragically gunned down by the would-be assassin, as Breitbart reports.
On July 13, during a large, outdoor rally in Butler, Trump was struck in the ear after gunshots rang out from a nearby rooftop in a stunning sequence of events seen by millions live on television.
Two spectators in the crowd were seriously injured in the incident, and retired fire chief Corey Comperatore, another rally attendee, was tragically killed by a bullet while shielding his family.
Though some might avoid ever visiting such a site again, Trump made a surprising announcement on his Truth Social network this past week, declaring that he had every intention of heading back to Butler for a very important reason.
In his characteristic all-caps style, Trump wrote, “I will be going back to Butler, Pennsylvania, for a big and beautiful rally, honoring the soul of our beloved firefighting hero, Corey, and those brave patriots injured two weeks ago.”
Hearkening back to the battle cry he released moments after being struck himself, Trump added, “What a day it will be – fight, fight, fight! Stay tuned for details.”
It was just last week that the Washington Post reported that the U.S. Secret Service had encouraged the Trump campaign to consider discontinuing the sort of large, outdoor rally events for which the former president is known.
Sources said to be familiar with the matter who spoke to the Post on condition of anonymity suggested that security vulnerabilities at outdoor venues were sufficient reason for Trump to explore alternative options.
The Post suggested that the Trump campaign had not planned any upcoming events in outdoor settings and was instead scouting sports arenas and similar venues for future rallies.
At the time of the paper's reporting, the Trump campaign declined to comment, and the reason for that may have revealed itself shortly thereafter, given the former president's announcement of his imminent return to Butler.
As CBS News noted, it was on Saturday that Trump moved to set the record straight on the rally question, posting again on Truth Social to say, “I will continue to do outdoor rallies, and Secret Service has agreed to substantially step up their operation."
They are very capable of doing so," he added. "No one can ever be allowed to stop or impede free speech or gathering!!!”
Though Trump supporters everywhere will no doubt be holding their breaths every time the former president takes the stage between now and November, his bravery in the face of mortal danger is undeniable and is among the reasons millions have already decided to cast a ballot for him this fall.