President Donald Trump has unleashed a fierce offensive against drug cartels, ordering air strikes on Caribbean drug-running boats that have left a reported 87 narcoterrorists dead.
This bold operation, spearheaded by Southern Command (SouthCom), targets Venezuelan cartels to halt fentanyl from flooding U.S. shores, while the War Department fires back at shoddy reporting with equal ferocity.
The strikes mark a decisive shift in strategy, prioritizing hard-hitting action over the softer focus SouthCom once had on issues like climate initiatives.
Under Trump’s directive, the military has designated these cartel groups as terrorist organizations, empowering the War Department to tackle the threat with unprecedented seriousness.
An asset buildup in the Caribbean, including the Ford carrier strike group, signals readiness for whatever the Commander-in-Chief orders next.
With contingencies in place for potential land operations, the administration is clearly not playing games when it comes to protecting American lives from this poison.
Amid the military success, War Department Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson didn’t hold back when addressing a recent story by The Washington Post, calling out what he sees as blatant falsehoods.
"And that Washington Post story that you mentioned was particularly egregious. They attributed a quote to the Secretary of War that he never said," Wilson stated, branding it 'scummy journalism' that readers should question.
Even The New York Times echoed criticism of the Post’s report, which falsely claimed Secretary Pete Hegseth advocated harming survivors of a targeted boat—a claim refuted by SouthCom’s top admiral.
Wilson, who leads a rapid response team to counter misleading media, has also welcomed fresh faces to Pentagon reporting after legacy outlets walked away over disputed press credential rules.
Those rules, contrary to some claims, never demanded pre-publication story reviews but merely urged compliance with laws on classified information—a reasonable ask in a world of sensitive operations.
Meanwhile, a Rasmussen Reports poll reveals 62% of Americans back using military force against these drug boats, showing strong public alignment with Trump’s tough stance.
"Now, SouthCom is actively engaging with these Narco terrorists, taking out 87 Narco terrorists to date and making sure that the American people are kept safe," Wilson emphasized, underscoring the mission’s core purpose.
Trump has hinted at possibly expanding this fight from sea to land, a move that could further disrupt cartel operations if enacted.
While the War Department remains focused on air strikes for now, it stands ready to pivot if the President calls for broader action, ensuring no threat to American safety goes unanswered.
Brace yourself for a family feud that’s gone from political podiums to personal pain. Hope Walz, the 24-year-old daughter of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, has taken to social media to blast President Donald Trump for using a derogatory term against her father, claiming it has unleashed a torrent of online venom against her loved ones.
This saga centers on Trump’s remark last month, where he labeled Gov. Walz with a deeply offensive slur for disabled individuals, a comment that Hope says has fueled relentless harassment targeting her family, including her brother Gus, who has a nonverbal learning disorder.
Let’s rewind to last month when Trump, in a heated rant, called Gov. Walz “seriously” impaired in a way that’s too crass to repeat here. That single jab didn’t just sting—it opened the floodgates for what Hope describes as a barrage of hateful messages aimed at her parents and siblings. It’s a low blow, even by the rough-and-tumble standards of political sparring.
Hope didn’t hold back in a TikTok video this weekend, painting a grim picture of the aftermath. “The president calling my dad what he did has unleashed a f****** s***storm, regarding, like, offensive language towards me, and my family, and specifically my brother,” she said. If words are weapons, this feels like an all-out assault on a family already under the campaign spotlight.
Her brother Gus, who deals with a nonverbal learning disorder, has been a particular target, facing a resurgence of slurs that first surfaced last August. Hope’s frustration is palpable as she notes supporters of Trump allegedly shouting the same ugly term while driving past their home. That’s not just politics; it’s personal.
Gov. Walz, a former educator, didn’t stay silent either, condemning Trump’s language as harmful and beneath the dignity of public discourse. Drawing from his classroom days, he argued such terms normalize toxicity, a point that resonates when you consider the real-world fallout for his kids. It’s hard to argue this isn’t a step too far.
In another TikTok clip still online, Hope aimed at Trump and his circle for what she sees as a pattern of tearing down entire communities. Her words carry a mix of sorrow and defiance, suggesting her family’s moral compass trumps any cheap shots thrown their way. It’s a rare glimpse into the toll of political mudslinging on those not even running for office.
She’s not wrong to point out the broader impact—throughout the campaign, figures aligned with Trump’s movement have taken jabs at Gov. Walz and Gus, especially after a heartfelt moment when Gus cheered his dad with “That’s my dad” at a public event. Mockery of that bond isn’t just tasteless; it’s a reminder of how low the discourse can sink.
Trump, for his part, hasn’t backed down, doubling down on his critique of Gov. Walz with a shrug of indifference. “Yeah, I think there’s something wrong with him. Absolutely,” he said. It’s classic Trump—unapologetic—, but it sidesteps the collateral damage his words seem to inflict.
From a conservative lens, there’s a fine line between tough talk and crossing into cruelty. Trump’s base might cheer his no-filter style, but when it spills over into a family’s private struggles—especially targeting a young man with a disability—it’s hard to defend as just “speaking his mind.” There’s strength in candor, but also in knowing when to pull a punch.
Hope’s deleted TikTok clip, as reported by Mediaite, showed raw anger over the abuse, a sentiment any parent or sibling can understand. Protecting family isn’t a partisan issue; it’s human. Yet, the question lingers—does political warfare justify this kind of fallout?
Gov. Walz has framed Trump’s behavior as a distraction from real issues, arguing it masks a lack of substance. While conservatives might scoff at progressive talking points, there’s merit in asking whether personal insults advance any meaningful debate. Policy, not playground taunts, should drive the conversation.
Let’s be clear: Trump has every right to criticize Gov. Walz’s record or leadership. But using language that drags a family into the crosshairs, especially a vulnerable member, feels like a misstep even for those who admire his tenacity. It’s not about being “woke”—it’s about basic respect.
The MAGA ethos often rails against oversensitivity, and rightly so when it stifles honest discussion. Yet, there’s a difference between pushing back on progressive overreach and endorsing a free-for-all where personal pain becomes fair game. Conservatives can champion free speech without losing sight of decency.
Hope Walz’s outcry is a sobering reminder that behind every political figure are real people bearing the brunt of public battles. Whether you stand with Trump or Walz, it’s worth asking if this is the kind of discourse we want shaping our national conversation. Maybe it’s time to fight ideas, not families.
Is America truly ready to shatter the ultimate glass ceiling, or are we still stumbling over old biases?
This question took center stage in a recent discussion hosted by Kristen Welker, where prominent figures weighed in on the challenges women face in the pursuit of the presidency, with pointed remarks from former First Lady Michelle Obama and reactions from Congressman Clyburn echoing past electoral struggles.
Last month, Michelle Obama didn’t mince words when addressing the nation’s readiness for a woman in the Oval Office. Her blunt assessment set the tone for the conversation that followed.
“As we saw in this past election, sadly, we ain’t ready,” Obama declared. Her words sting with a truth many conservatives quietly acknowledge—cultural hang-ups often trump merit when the ballot box looms. But isn’t it time we stopped hiding behind excuses and pushed for real change?
Welker, steering the discussion, played a clip of Obama’s remarks to spark reactions. She pressed Congressman Clyburn on whether the nation could embrace a female commander-in-chief. It’s a fair question, but one that often gets drowned in platitudes instead of hard answers.
Clyburn didn’t dodge the issue, offering a nod to history’s harsh lessons. He referenced past campaigns by strong female contenders like Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris, noting how close yet far they came.
“Michelle Obama is absolutely correct,” Clyburn affirmed, pointing to a pattern of missed opportunities. His agreement isn’t just a concession—it’s a challenge to conservatives and liberals alike to stop dragging our feet.
Clyburn also shared that he had a pleasant chat with Harris recently, though details remained scarce. It’s a small but telling reminder that behind the political theater, personal respect can still exist.
Yet, Clyburn’s tone carried a warning about backsliding on progress. He used a metaphor of steps forward and backward in elections, a vivid picture of how fragile gains can be. For those of us wary of progressive overreach, isn’t this a call to ensure fairness without bowing to woke mandates?
The discussion wasn’t just about past failures—it was a mirror to our current cultural divide. Many on the right see the push for a female president as often tangled with identity politics, which can alienate rather than unite.
Still, dismissing the barriers of sexism and racism, as highlighted by Harris herself, would be intellectually dishonest. Conservatives can champion meritocracy while admitting that not all playing fields are level yet. It’s not about quotas; it’s about clarity.
Clyburn’s concern about regressing resonates even with those skeptical of the left’s agenda. His imagery of taking steps backward in elections hits home—America can’t afford to keep replaying the same tired script.
For conservatives, the path forward isn’t pandering to every social grievance but ensuring that talent, not tradition, dictates outcomes. If a woman is the best candidate, she should win—plain and simple.
Welker’s platform gave voice to a long overdue debate, stripping away the fluff of political correctness. Michelle Obama’s candor and Clyburn’s historical lens remind us that change doesn’t come from wishful thinking but from confronting uncomfortable realities.
So, where do we stand as a nation? If history is indeed prologue, as Clyburn suggests, then conservatives must lead by valuing principle over prejudice—without surrendering to the left’s narrative. Let’s prove we’re ready, not by words, but by votes when the right leader emerges.
Tragic news has struck the country music world as Criscilla Anderson, a beloved singer and Netflix star, has lost her courageous fight against colon cancer at just 45 years old.
Known for her role on the 2020 Netflix series “Country Ever After” alongside ex-husband Coffey Anderson, Criscilla’s passing was announced posthumously via Instagram on December 2, 2025, leaving behind a legacy of faith, family, and fierce determination.
The New York Post reported that Anderson’s journey began with a diagnosis of colon cancer in 2018, a battle she faced with grit while raising three biological children—Ethan, Emmarie, and Everleigh—and a stepdaughter, Savannah, whom she lovingly called her “bonus girl.”
Before her music career, Anderson dazzled as a choreographer for the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, showcasing the same energy that later defined her as a performer. Her marriage to Coffey Anderson from 2009 to 2022 brought her into the spotlight, blending family life with artistic dreams.
The Netflix series “Country Ever After” captured their story, highlighting Anderson’s struggle with stage 3 colon cancer while leaning on Christian faith for strength. It was raw, real, and a reminder of what matters when the progressive agenda often pushes shallow priorities over family values.
By 2021, Anderson celebrated remission—a hard-won victory that sadly didn’t last. When the cancer returned in late 2022, it came with a vengeance, showing the harsh reality of a disease that doesn’t play fair.
Last month, before the heartbreaking announcement, her friend Lindsey Villatoro shared that Anderson’s cancer had spread to her brain following a stroke. It was a gut punch, yet Anderson’s spirit never wavered as she explored treatment options like radiation and clinical trials.
Her posthumous Instagram post, shared by Lindsey, was a testament to her love for her family and her unyielding faith. “If you’re reading this, I’ve finally slipped into the arms of Jesus – peacefully and surrounded by love,” Anderson wrote, a message that cuts through the noise of today’s self-obsessed culture.
Let’s unpack that quote—while the left often scoffs at faith as outdated, Anderson’s words remind us that spiritual strength can anchor a person through unimaginable pain. Her focus wasn’t on victimhood but on eternal hope, a perspective sorely missing in modern discourse.
Anderson’s message to her children was equally powerful, filled with personal promises to each one. “My babies … I am watching over you,” she said, a line that hits hard for anyone who values the sacred bond of family over fleeting societal trends.
Her ex-husband, Coffey Anderson, also paid tribute, writing, “Criscilla defined strength and fighter like no other person on the planet.” High praise, but let’s be honest—while Hollywood often glorifies weakness as virtue, Anderson’s life showed that real strength isn’t performative; it’s lived.
Her battle wasn’t just physical; it was mental and emotional, as she told People magazine before the cancer’s return. She spoke of preparing for bad news, treating cancer like a chronic condition—an approach that’s both pragmatic and a slap in the face to the “just feel good” mentality peddled by progressive ideologues.
Anderson’s story isn’t just about loss; it’s about how she lived—loving deeply, fighting hard, and holding fast to her beliefs. In a world obsessed with tearing down traditional values, her reliance on faith stands as a quiet rebellion against cultural decay.
Her passing leaves a void for her fans, her family, and the music community that admired her resilience. Yet, as she said, “I am not gone … I’m Home,” a final note of peace that challenges us to rethink what truly matters when the curtain falls.
Is the latest Democratic maneuver against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth a principled stand or just political theater?
Breitbart reported that Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-MI) dropped a bombshell on Wednesday, declaring his intent to file articles of impeachment against Hegseth over a controversial military operation in the Caribbean on September 2, tying it to past remarks on war crimes from 2016.
Let’s rewind to those 2016 comments, first unearthed by CNN and later expanded on by The Hill, where Hegseth spoke at a Liberty Forum of Silicon Valley event.
“I do think there have to be consequences for abject war crimes,” Hegseth said back then, per the Hill’s reporting.
Thanedar seems to think this old quote is a smoking gun, but isn’t it a stretch to weaponize a general statement about military accountability against a specific operation years later?
Fast forward to September 2, when a U.S. military strike targeted a suspected Venezuelan drug boat in the Caribbean, destroying the vessel in an initial hit.
A follow-up attack, ordered directly by Admiral Frank Bradley under Hegseth’s authorization per White House statements, reportedly took out survivors of the first strike.
Hegseth told reporters he watched the first strike live but didn’t stick around for the second, saying, “I moved on to my next meeting.”
Now, is that an admission of negligence or just a busy man prioritizing his schedule? Critics like Thanedar are quick to paint it as the former, but let’s not rush to judgment without the full operational context.
Thanedar isn’t backing down, planning to unveil his impeachment articles on Thursday morning at a rally in Washington, D.C.’s Union Station.
His office, via a press advisory obtained by Axios, claims the charges will include accusations of murder, conspiracy, and mishandling classified information—serious allegations that sound more like a Hollywood script than a House floor debate.
Yet, even some on the left aren’t buying the hype, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) throwing cold water on the idea, noting that a Republican-controlled House is unlikely to let this move forward.
While a senior Democrat hinted that outside groups might rally behind Thanedar, the lack of enthusiasm from party leadership suggests this could be more of a solo crusade than a coordinated offensive.
Jeffries’ skepticism, combined with the GOP’s firm grip on the House, paints a picture of an uphill battle for Thanedar—one that might be more about scoring points with a progressive base than achieving real results.
Still, the controversy around the Caribbean strike and Hegseth’s role deserves scrutiny, even if impeachment feels like a long shot. The balance between military accountability and political posturing is a tightrope, and conservatives should demand clarity on what happened on September 2 without falling for partisan traps.
A suspected terrorist tied to ISIS-K has been nabbed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) right here on American soil, courtesy of a resettlement program that’s raising serious eyebrows.
Breitbart reported that this arrest of Jaan Shah Safi, an Afghan national, in Waynesboro, Virginia, on Wednesday, shines a glaring spotlight on the Biden administration’s Operation Allies Welcome, a program that resettled tens of thousands of Afghans with what critics call dangerously lax vetting.
Safi first set foot in the U.S. on Sept. 8, 2021, arriving in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as part of this resettlement effort.
ICE officials have confirmed that Safi allegedly provided support to both the Islamic State of Iraq and the notorious ISIS-K, a group known for its ruthless extremism.
Adding to the alarm, reports indicate Safi supplied weapons to his father, a militia commander in Afghanistan, painting a troubling picture of his connections before arriving stateside.
After entering the U.S., Safi applied for Temporary Protected Status (TPS), but that lifeline was cut short when DHS Secretary Kristi Noem terminated TPS for Afghans, leaving him classified as an unauthorized migrant.
Speaking on the arrest, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem didn’t hold back, stating, “Today, our heroic ICE officers arrested Jaan Shah Safi, a terrorist who provided material support to ISIS-K.”
Her words cut to the core of a broader concern: how did someone with such alleged ties slip through the cracks of a program meant to offer refuge, not risk?
Noem further criticized the resettlement operation, saying, “The Biden administration brought this terrorist into the U.S. under the disastrous Operation Allies Welcome program.”
She pointed out that Safi’s arrest occurred not far from Washington, D.C., where another Afghan resettled through the same program, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, allegedly ambushed and shot two National Guardsmen last month.
Tragically, Sarah Beckstrom succumbed to her injuries, while Andrew Wolfe remains in serious condition, a stark reminder of the potential consequences of inadequate screening.
Adding fuel to the fire, yet another Afghan national, Mohammad Dawood Alokozay, resettled under the same initiative, was arrested on Nov. 25 in Fort Worth, Texas, after allegedly posting a video on TikTok hinting at plans for a terrorist attack in the area.
These incidents, taken together, paint a damning portrait of a policy that, while perhaps well-intentioned, has left gaping holes in national security, according to critics like Noem who argue for a complete overhaul.
With nearly 190,000 Afghan nationals admitted under Operation Allies Welcome, as Noem noted, the scale of unvetted entries is staggering—identities and intentions often verified only after they’ve already settled in American communities.
It’s a sobering wake-up call: good intentions must be matched with ironclad safeguards, or the price paid could be far too high for our nation to bear.
Brace yourself for a jaw-dropping revelation: Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has announced rampant visa fraud in Minnesota that’s costing taxpayers dearly.
During a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, December 2, 2025, Noem exposed that half of all visa holders in Minnesota submitted fraudulent applications, while separate probes uncovered massive scams involving Somali immigrants and over $1 billion in misused taxpayer funds.
This isn’t just a paperwork glitch— it’s a systemic failure.
According to Noem, a recent two-week investigation by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) found that nearly half of at least 1,000 immigrant households visited were entangled in some form of immigration deception.
USCIS Director Joseph B. Edlow detailed a laundry list of violations, including marriage scams, overstayed visas, fake employment claims, forged papers, and misuse of H1B and F1 visa programs.
It’s a bureaucratic mess that raises serious questions about oversight and accountability in Minnesota’s immigration processes.
Noem didn’t hold back in her assessment, suggesting this isn’t mere incompetence but possibly intentional negligence at the state level.
“You told me to look into Minnesota and their fraud on visas and their programs: 50% of them are fraudulent, which means that that wacko Gov. (Tim) Walz either is an idiot or he did it on purpose — and I think he’s both, sir,” Noem stated during the Cabinet meeting.
While her words are sharp, they reflect a growing frustration among conservatives about lax policies that seem to prioritize optics over security— a fair critique when billions are at stake.
Noem also claimed that those behind the fraudulent visa applications enrolled in government programs, siphoning off hundreds of billions in taxpayer dollars.
She vowed action, stating, “Those who submitted fraudulent visa applications signed up for government programs, took hundreds of billions of dollars from the taxpayers, and we’re going to remove them and get our money back.”
That’s a bold promise, and if delivered, it could restore some faith in a system that feels broken to many hardworking Americans.
Adding fuel to the fire, the U.S. House Oversight Committee and Treasury Department are investigating a separate fraud scheme involving Somali immigrants, allegedly defrauding over $1 billion through a COVID-era food relief program meant for schoolchildren in Minnesota.
Reports indicate that nonprofits, especially around Minneapolis, funneled taxpayer money to employees who splurged on luxury cars and real estate, with some funds reportedly tied to the Somali terrorist group al-Shabaab— a connection that’s deeply troubling and demands answers.
Federal authorities have already prosecuted 78 individuals and convicted 59 in the Feeding Our Future scandal, a nonprofit that pocketed at least $250 million in taxpayer funds, showing the scale of this betrayal of public trust.
Former Minneapolis Sheriff Rich Stanek weighed in, noting Minnesota’s historically hospitable stance may have blinded officials to these issues, a “Minnesota nice” attitude that’s charming until it costs billions.
Meanwhile, as investigations continue, the spotlight remains on state leadership to explain how such widespread fraud— whether in visas or relief programs— went unchecked for so long.
Michael Dell, the owner of Dell Technologies, along with his wife Susan Dell, have pledged $6.25 billion to help President Donald Trump's initiative to introduce children to investing as part of his One Big Beautiful Bill.
Under Trump's plan, parents of children born as U.S. citizens between 2025 and 2028 would receive $1,000 grants to open investment accounts in the children's names.
The Dells' contribution would add 25 million to the number of children who could be helped with the grants, giving $250 each for children under 10 years old who were not covered under Trump's window and live in zip codes with median incomes of $150,000 or less.
The donation will be the largest for American children ever given, according to the non-profit Invest America that works with the Dells.
“It’s designed to help families feel supported from the start and encourage them to keep saving as their children grow,” Michael Dell told CNBC in an interview. “We know that when children have accounts like this, they’re much more likely to graduate from high school, from college, buy a home, start a business and less likely to be incarcerated.”
The Trump bill allows any parents of children under 18 with Social Security numbers to open the accounts, which are tax-advantaged, starting on July 4, 2026.
“We want to help the children that weren’t part of the government program,” Dell said.
Invest America, run by hedge fund manager Brad Gerstner, advocated for the accounts to be included in Trump's bill, and it fits his agenda of encouraging investment and combatting poverty among families.
Dell Technologies has said it will match the $1,000 seed money in Trump accounts for new employees of the company.
“It would have been impractical, or maybe even impossible, to impact this many kids in this way without such a program,” Dell said.
Withdrawals fromt the accounts are not allowed until the child is 18, at which point it rolls over into an IRA and withdrawals are taxed.
Some states' versions of 529 plans have more tax advantages than the Trump accounts, but Trump is looking beyond funding college educations.
Michael Dell is hopeful that other companies will join him in funding the Trump accounts.
“What we hope is that every child sees a future worth saving for it,” he said. “You think about the compounding effect of a program like this in 10, 20, 30 years on millions of children. That’s what gets us excited.”
The Indiana state House has decided to pursue redistricting to gain a GOP seat in the U.S. House after President Donald Trump pushed the matter, and the Senate plans to reconvene if the House passes a newly drawn map.
Senate GOP leader Rodric Bray said two weeks ago that there wasn't enough support to move forward with redistricting, but reversed course when Trump threatened to primary GOP state senators if they did not act.
"A RINO State Senator, Rodric Bray, who doesn’t care about keeping the Majority in the House in D.C., is the primary problem. Soon, he will have a Primary Problem, as will any other politician who supports him in this stupidity," Trump posted on social media after Bray's initial refusal.
Last week, State House Speaker Todd Huston announced, "House Republicans will gavel in on Monday, Dec. 1, reconvening the 2026 regular session. All legislative business will be considered beginning next week, including redrawing the state’s congressional map."
Subsequently, Bray posted, "The issue of redrawing Indiana's congressional maps mid-cycle has received a lot of attention and is causing strife here in our state. To resolve this issue, the Senate intends to reconvene as part of the regular 2026 session on Dec. 8."
The House now has a razor-thin GOP majority, and is trying to preserve it in the midterm elections.
So far, signs have pointed toward GOP losing some seats, which would quickly deny them the majority.
California will be moving forward with redistricting in the opposite direction, while Texas could gain a significant number of GOP seats if it can overcome legal challenges to its plan.
Meanwhile, Trump is scrapping for every single seat he can possibly get, knowing that a Democrat House will pretty much kill his agenda outside of getting GOP-leaning judges appointed.
In Indiana, seven of nine seats are already Republican-controlled, but it's a solid GOP state, so what's one more?
In California, 25% of voters are registered Republican, but only 17% of districts are currently held by Republicans. If the gerrymandering efforts there are successful, up to five more seats could go to Democrats, making things even more lopsided there.
Every seat could be important in 2026, and Trump knows full well that he won't get much accomplished if he can't pass any of his bills in Congress.
Of course, Democrats have a massive advantage between California redistricting and the historical loss of seats for the ruling party in the midterms.
The bloodbath could be massive, and it seems likely that Republicans will not control the House in 2027, the way things are going.
Northwestern University is waving the white flag amid an intense legal battle with the Trump administration over antisemitism.
Northwestern University agreed to send $75 million to the U.S. government to resolve a series of investigations into antisemitism, according to a report from The Associated Press on Saturday.
In return, the Trump administration will restore millions of dollars in federal research funding to the Chicago university.
This is a major victory for Trump, who is going to battle with dozens of prestigious universities that allowed brazen and violent pro-Palestinian protests that often resulted in violence and intimidation against Jewish students.
With Northwestern capitulating, other universities are likely going to see the writing on the wall and recover what they can.
Trump used hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding to wage war on Northwestern's leftist leadership.
Trump halted an astounding $790 million in grants, which led to mass layoffs for the university and even the resignation of President Michael Schill in September.
The AP reported, "Under the agreement announced Friday night, Northwestern will make the payment to the U.S. Treasury over the next three years. Among other commitments it also requires the university to revoke the so-called Deering Meadow agreement, which it signed in April 2024 in exchange for pro-Palestinian protesters ending their tent encampment on campus."
2024 saw widespread campus takeovers by Palestinian protest groups who would create no-go zones and get violent with students who wouldn't cooperate with their agenda, Jewish or not.
One can only imagine the reaction if White Nationalist groups had created encampments and essentially seized entire quads on university campuses around the nation while intimidating and violently attacking students.
No doubt the National Guard would have been called in, and police would have been given carte blanche to drive those groups out. In reality, these universities ended up negotiating with these protestors and widespread antisemitism was practically condoned at universities receiving federal funds.
Trump has rightfully come down on these leftist universities for allowing this situation, and now these universities will have to spend millions on Trump's initiatives to rectify the situation.
This issue isn't just about antisemitism on college campuses, as Trump has made it clear he has no patience for the "woke" rule of America's university system. The days of universities being able to push out conservative thought are over, with the federal government cracking down.
Now the question is, which university is going to throw in the towel next? It's always been clear that if enough schools give in, it will only empower Trump's use of federal power to enforce institutional change at publicly funded universities.