Hold onto your hats, folks—former President Donald Trump has just thrown a curveball at House Republicans, demanding they vote to release long-hidden files on Jeffrey Epstein.
Trump’s latest push, coupled with a Department of Justice probe into Epstein’s ties to prominent Democrats, has reignited a controversy that he calls a distraction from Republican priorities, Fox News reported.
This saga kicked off on Friday when Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, insisted that House Republicans should push for the release of Epstein-related documents.
He doubled down on Sunday with a fiery Truth Social post, framing the issue as a political ploy by Democrats to sidetrack GOP momentum.
“As I said on Friday night aboard Air Force One to the Fake News Media, House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files, because we have nothing to hide, and it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax,” Trump declared. Let’s unpack that—Trump’s confidence suggests he believes there’s no dirt to find, or at least none that sticks to his party.
Instead of dwelling on Epstein, Trump urged Republicans to pivot to bread-and-butter issues like the economy, tax cuts, border security, and rebuilding the military.
Meanwhile, the Department of Justice isn’t sitting idle—Attorney General Pam Bondi announced on Friday a fresh investigation into potential links between Epstein and high-profile Democrats.
Names like former President Bill Clinton, LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers are under scrutiny, per Trump’s own remarks.
Bondi tapped Jay Clayton, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, to lead the probe, praising him as a top-tier prosecutor. “Clayton is one of the most capable and trusted prosecutors in the country,” she stated on X, signaling a no-nonsense approach to the investigation.
Trump isn’t just cheering for transparency—he’s sounding the alarm that this Epstein fixation could be a snare for Republicans.
He argues that if Democrats had any real bombshells, they’d have dropped them long before now, rather than letting the issue fester.
His message to the GOP is clear: don’t get bogged down in this mudslinging when there are bigger wins to tout, like slashing inflation and boosting affordability.
Trump also pointed out that the House Oversight Committee should have full access to whatever files they’re legally owed, showing he’s not dodging accountability.
Yet, he’s adamant that the party must steer the conversation back to policy victories over progressive distractions. If the GOP falls into what he calls a “trap,” they risk losing focus on rebuilding America’s strength and security.
Ultimately, Trump’s stance blends a call for openness with a sharp reminder to prioritize the issues that resonate with everyday Americans. While the Epstein files may hold secrets, the real story might be how Republicans navigate this sideshow without losing sight of their core mission.
Brace yourselves, Charlotte—federal agents are rolling into town with a mission to tackle public safety threats tied to unauthorized migration, and the sparks are already flying.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has kicked off a major immigration enforcement operation in Charlotte, N.C., deploying additional law enforcement to address what they call serious risks to the community, while local leaders cry foul over the fear and uncertainty it’s stirring among residents, Just The News reported.
This all started heating up on Thursday when Mecklenburg County Sheriff Garry McFadden got word from federal officials that U.S. Customs and Border Patrol personnel would arrive in Charlotte either Saturday or early next week. The heads-up was a nod to collaboration, but the suddenness of it all has left many on edge. What’s the plan, and who’s really being targeted?
Saturday marked the official start of these operations, as confirmed by DHS, with Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin doubling down on the need to protect Americans from what she sees as dangerous elements. “Americans should be able to live without fear of violent criminal illegal aliens hurting them, their families, or their neighbors,” McLaughlin stated, as reported by The Associated Press. But let’s be honest—painting this as a simple safety fix ignores the messy reality on the ground.
Local officials aren’t buying the “public safety” line without question. Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles, County Commissioner Mark Jerrell, and school board member Stephanie Sneed issued a joint statement saying, “We want people in Charlotte and Mecklenburg County to know we stand with all residents who simply want to go about their lives.” It’s a noble sentiment, but when federal boots hit the pavement, platitudes won’t calm the nerves of a city with over 150,000 foreign-born residents among its 900,000-strong population.
Even Sheriff McFadden, while welcoming better communication with federal partners, seems to be walking a tightrope. He’s emphasized the need for trust and safety in Mecklenburg County, but with the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department explicitly sitting this one out, it’s clear not everyone’s on board with DHS’s playbook.
North Carolina Governor Josh Stein dropped a bombshell on Friday, pointing out that the “vast majority” of those detained in these sweeps have no criminal convictions, and some are even U.S. citizens. That’s a far cry from the narrative of rounding up hardened threats. If true, it raises serious questions about the scope and precision of this operation.
Governor Stein didn’t stop there—he’s urged residents to document any overreach by authorities and report it to local law enforcement. It’s a subtle jab at federal tactics, suggesting the state isn’t fully confident in how this crackdown will play out. And in a city as diverse as Charlotte, that lack of confidence could fray community bonds faster than you can say “paperwork error.”
Let’s not pretend this is happening in a vacuum. The Trump administration has been ramping up efforts nationwide to combat violent crime and unauthorized migration, with National Guard troops deployed to cities like Chicago, Washington, D.C., Memphis, and Los Angeles. While courts have blocked similar moves in Portland, Charlotte’s now the latest battleground in this broader push.
Assistant Secretary McLaughlin’s rhetoric about ensuring safety is hard to argue against in principle—who doesn’t want safer streets? But when the net catches folks with clean records or even citizenship, it starts looking less like precision and more like a sledgehammer approach. The administration needs to show its homework on who’s really a threat.
Local leaders are right to worry about the ripple effects of fear in a community where so many have ties abroad. Charlotte isn’t just a dot on a map; it’s a vibrant hub where trust between residents and authorities matters. Sweeps like this, if mishandled, risk turning neighbors into suspects overnight.
On the flip side, ignoring public safety concerns tied to unauthorized migration isn’t an option either. The challenge for DHS is proving this operation isn’t just political theater but a targeted effort to address real risks. So far, the jury’s out, and Charlotte’s residents are left waiting for answers.
The clash between federal priorities and local values isn’t new, but it’s playing out in real time on Charlotte’s streets. With the police department stepping back from immigration enforcement, the burden of perception falls squarely on DHS to avoid missteps. Transparency, not just muscle, will be the key to keeping this from spiraling.
For now, Governor Stein’s call to record any inappropriate behavior by authorities is a reminder that accountability cuts both ways. If federal agents overstep, they’ll have more than just local leaders to answer to—they’ll face a public armed with smartphones and skepticism. That’s a modern reality no badge can ignore.
As this operation unfolds, Charlotte stands as a microcosm of a national debate over how to handle immigration without sacrificing community or safety. The Trump administration’s hardline stance may resonate with those fed up with lax borders, but it must tread carefully to avoid alienating the very Americans it claims to protect. Here’s hoping for clarity—and calm—in the days ahead.
Picture this: two former presidents, once inseparable allies, now can’t even share a greeting over dinner in the heart of Washington, D.C.
The relationship between Barack Obama and Joe Biden, once a cornerstone of Democratic unity, has reportedly crumbled into a bitter divide, marked by public snubs and behind-the-scenes resentment, Breitbart reported.
ABC reporter Jonathan Karl has pulled back the curtain on this fallout, describing the current state of their bond as anything but friendly.
Last month, the tension became glaringly obvious when both Obama and Biden were spotted at Café Milano, a popular D.C. restaurant, yet didn’t exchange a single word.
Karl noted, “They didn’t interact at all,” highlighting how even their security teams had to shuffle around each other while the two men stayed worlds apart.
For those of us skeptical of the left’s unity narrative, this isn’t just a personal tiff—it’s a public display of a fractured party that’s lost its way.
The bad blood seems to trace back to Biden’s exit from the presidential race, a decision his inner circle largely attributes to Obama’s influence after a disastrous debate against Donald Trump.
Karl put it bluntly, saying, “Biden and the people around him very much blame Barack Obama for the effort to push Biden out of the campaign.”
That kind of betrayal isn’t easily forgiven, especially when it comes from someone who once handpicked Biden as his vice president, only to seemingly turn on him when the stakes got high.
After Democrats shifted their support to Vice President Kamala Harris, Biden reportedly made calls to rally backing for her—but conspicuously left Obama off the list.
Even when Obama reached out, Biden refused to take the call, and the two didn’t speak for weeks, a silence that speaks louder than any press release.
This isn’t just politics; it’s personal, and it’s a stark reminder that even the tightest alliances on the left can unravel under the weight of ambition and progressive priorities.
In late July, Obama publicly endorsed Harris, praising her as having the vision and strength needed for the moment, a move that likely stung Biden even more.
Meanwhile, conservatives can’t help but see this as the Democratic machine discarding loyalists for the next shiny object, a pattern that undermines trust in their so-called values.
While some may argue this is just business in politics, the Café Milano snub and unanswered calls paint a picture of a rift too deep for spin to fix, leaving many to wonder if this divide will further weaken an already stumbling party.
Brace yourselves, folks -- President Donald Trump’s Department of War has just unleashed a bold new mission to purge drug traffickers from our corner of the world.
Under the banner of Operation Southern Spear, the administration is ramping up military efforts to shield the U.S. from deadly narcotics by targeting so-called narco-terrorists across the Western Hemisphere, though not without stirring a hornet’s nest of criticism from both domestic opponents and foreign leaders, as the Daily Caller reports.
Let’s rewind to late October, when the Pentagon green-lit the deployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier strike group to Latin America. That massive naval muscle arrived in the U.S. Southern Command’s area of responsibility just two days before the operation’s big reveal. For those not in the know, SOUTHCOM, headquartered in Miami, oversees military actions across the Caribbean, Central America, and South America.
On Oct. 10, SOUTHCOM dropped a press release announcing the formation of Joint Task Force Southern Spear, a unit designed to coordinate and boost counter-narcotics efforts across the region. This task force, reporting straight to SOUTHCOM, aims for a multinational, whole-of-government strategy to dismantle criminal networks exploiting shared borders and seas.
Fast forward to a recent Thursday evening, when the Department of War officially launched Operation Southern Spear. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth took to X to proclaim the mission’s intent, stating it seeks to remove “narco-terrorists from our Hemisphere” and secure “our Homeland from the drugs that are killing our people." While the goal resonates with many tired of drug-fueled devastation, one wonders if the heavy-handed approach risks more than it resolves.
Hegseth didn’t stop there, adding, “President Trump ordered action -- and the Department of War is delivering." That’s a clear signal this administration isn’t messing around, but deploying aircraft carriers and strike groups to “America’s neighborhood” might be less a friendly visit and more a sledgehammer to crack a walnut.
Action has already heated up, with recent strikes on suspected narco boats off Venezuela’s coast setting the stage for this operation. Just days before the announcement, on a Monday, U.S. forces executed their 20th lethal attack on alleged drug trafficking vessels, according to multiple reports citing unnamed Pentagon sources. That’s a lot of firepower for a problem many argue needs more than just military might.
Domestic pushback isn’t hard to find either. Earlier this month, on Nov. 6, the U.S. Senate shot down a War Powers Resolution proposed by Sens. Tim Kaine and Rand Paul that would have forced Trump to seek congressional approval for these Caribbean strikes. Falling nine votes short of breaking a filibuster, the failed measure shows even some conservatives aren’t sold on unchecked executive muscle.
Across the border, Latin American leaders are sounding alarms too. Colombian President Gustavo Petro, leading a nation widely known as the top cocaine producer, publicly cautioned Trump against ongoing attacks on cartel boats. His cryptic warning -- “don’t attack the condor” -- and follow-up that continued strikes would awaken “the American people’s jaguar” suggest deeper unrest if the U.S. persists.
Colombia’s unease isn’t isolated, as the operation’s aggressive posture rubs many in the region the wrong way. When your neighbor starts swinging a bat in the backyard, it’s hard not to flinch, even if the target is a shared nuisance. The question looms: will this mission unite or divide the hemisphere?
Adding fuel to the fire, Trump revealed last month that Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro tried to barter a stake in Venezuela’s oil projects to halt U.S. military strikes on suspected narcotics boats. Trump flat-out rejected the offer, signaling no deal will deter this crackdown. It’s a firm stance, but one that might escalate tensions with a regime already on edge.
SOUTHCOM’s own words from its Oct. 10 release underscore the mission’s scope, noting the Joint Task Force’s creation reflects a “commitment to a whole-of-government, multinational approach to defeat and dismantle criminal networks." That sounds noble on paper, but coordinating across nations with conflicting interests is like herding cats -- good luck with that.
Operation Southern Spear, led by Joint Task Force Southern Spear under SOUTHCOM’s watchful eye, clearly aims to disrupt the flow of deadly drugs into the U.S. But at what cost? Military solutions to systemic issues like addiction and trafficking often hit hard but miss the root.
For many Americans weary of progressive policies that seem to coddle rather than confront crime, Trump’s decisive action might feel like a breath of fresh air. Yet, even conservatives must ask if this show of force risks alienating allies or entangling the U.S. in unintended conflicts. Balance, not bravado, might be the smarter play.
As this operation unfolds, the Western Hemisphere watches with bated breath. Will Trump’s war on narco-terrorists fortify “America’s neighborhood,” or will it spark a backlash too big to contain? Only time will tell, but one thing’s certain -- this isn’t a quiet cleanup operation.
Imagine a routine pill for cholesterol turning into a near-death experience.
A 63-year-old South Carolina woman endured a harrowing ordeal after taking rosuvastatin, a statin drug also used by President Donald Trump, only to suffer a rare and life-threatening condition called rhabdomyolysis that caused severe muscle damage and kidney strain.
For a year, this woman diligently took rosuvastatin, commonly known as Crestor, to manage her high cholesterol and coronary artery disease, a condition affecting millions of Americans.
Then, disaster struck as she began experiencing sudden swelling, soreness, and weakness in her legs.
The symptoms escalated to the point where she couldn’t stand, culminating in a dangerous fall in her bathroom.
At the hospital, blood tests and MRI scans painted a grim picture: severe muscle damage, rampant inflammation, and sky-high creatine kinase levels signaling massive tissue breakdown.
Even worse, her kidneys were under siege from toxic debris released by the crumbling muscles, evidenced by alarming creatinine levels in her system.
Doctors delivered the diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis, a rare but potentially fatal condition that strikes about 26,000 Americans annually and can be lethal in nearly 59% of severe cases if not caught early.
While survival odds hover around 90% with prompt treatment, the fact that statins like rosuvastatin—taken by roughly 40 million in the U.S.—are a recognized, albeit rare, trigger (one in a million annually) raises eyebrows about what Big Pharma isn’t shouting from the rooftops.
How does a drug meant to protect your heart end up shredding your muscles? Statins can disrupt cell membranes and block CoQ10, a vital component for muscle energy, leading to breakdown and toxin release—a silent betrayal by a pill prescribed in 11.8 million doses of Crestor alone in 2023.
Now, consider this: rosuvastatin is "the same statin taken by President Donald Trump," a point worth noting when discussing its risks and reach.
Trump’s own cholesterol journey, from a borderline high of 223 total and 143 LDL in 2018 despite a 10 mg dose, to a stellar 140 total and 51 LDL by 2025 with the addition of ezetimibe, shows the drug’s potential when it doesn’t backfire—though Dr. Ronny Jackson once noted he’d "increase the medication dosage to manage these numbers better."
For our South Carolina survivor, treatment meant halting the statin immediately and flooding her system with IV fluids to flush out toxins and shield her kidneys.
After 12 grueling days in the hospital, she made a steady recovery and was discharged, a testament to modern medicine catching this beast of a condition just in time.
Yet, her story begs the question: with high cholesterol risking heart attacks, strokes, and kidney disease if left unchecked, are we too quick to trust these pills without weighing the rare but real dangers? While progressive health agendas push blanket prescriptions, a conservative look says let’s prioritize patient education over blind faith in pharmaceuticals.
Hold onto your hats, folks—New York Attorney General Letitia James, a darling of the progressive elite, finds herself in hot water with police calls piling up at properties she owns, Breitbart reported.
Reports reveal a troubling pattern of frequent law enforcement visits to two homes tied to James, alongside a Virginia grand jury indictment accusing her of mortgage fraud.
Let’s start with the Virginia property, which James allegedly claimed as a second home to snag favorable mortgage rates.
The indictment, handed down on Oct. 9, 2025, contends that the house isn’t a cozy retreat for James but rather a rental, a move that could jack up interest rates if disclosed properly.
Occupying this residence is James’s grandniece, Nakia Thompson, who reportedly settled there with her three children back in 2020.
Police have been no strangers to this address, responding at least a dozen times for everything from vandalism to domestic disputes, with half a dozen calls just in October 2025.
Now, let’s talk about the other property, snapped up by James in 2023, which also seems to double as a haven for family members with legal troubles.
Between April 2024 and April 2025, law enforcement rolled up to this second home ten times, including at least one incident involving an assault.
That’s over two dozen total police dispatches to properties under James’s name—hardly the hallmark of quiet, law-abiding neighborhoods.
James, never one to shy away from a fight, has pushed back against the mortgage fraud accusations with a familiar refrain.
“The mortgage fraud case against her is ‘about a justice system which has been weaponized,’” James declared, per reports.
Weaponized or not, the optics of fudging mortgage details while championing public integrity don’t exactly scream trustworthiness—especially when police are practically on speed dial at your properties.
As for Thompson, the grandniece living in the Virginia home, she’s taken to social media to downplay her own rap sheet.
“[She has] not been in trouble in ‘years at all,’” Thompson posted on Facebook, though the frequent police presence at her residence might suggest otherwise to skeptical observers.
While family struggles deserve empathy, the pattern of legal entanglements and property misuse tied to a high-profile official like James raises fair questions about accountability—questions conservatives have long asked of those pushing progressive agendas from ivory towers.
Hold onto your hats, folks— the U.S. border just hit a milestone that’s got everyone talking.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has proudly reported a record-breaking drop in unauthorized border crossings for October, marking the start of fiscal 2026 with the lowest numbers ever seen for that month, the Washington Examiner reported.
This isn’t just a small dip; it’s a historic plunge.
DHS data reveals a staggering 30,561 total encounters nationwide in October 2025, a figure hailed as the smallest start to any fiscal year in Customs and Border Protection (CBP) history.
That’s a jaw-dropping 79% decrease from the same month last year under the previous administration, and a solid 29% lower than the prior record low set over a decade ago.
Progressives might squirm at these stats, but let’s be real—fewer unauthorized crossings mean a tighter grip on national security, something most Americans can get behind.
Adding to the achievement, DHS noted six straight months of zero releases of unauthorized migrants into the country.
This policy shift is a stark contrast to the more lenient approaches of the prior administration, signaling a no-nonsense stance that prioritizes enforcement over open-door ideals.
While some critics may cry foul, arguing for compassion over control, the data suggests this strategy is working—numbers don’t lie, even if they don’t fit a feel-good narrative.
Since the first full day of the current administration, DHS has logged 106,134 enforcement encounters along the Southwest Border through the end of October.
That’s well below the monthly average of 155,485 encounters seen under the previous leadership, with daily apprehensions down by a whopping 95%.
“History made: the lowest border crossings in October history and the sixth straight month of ZERO releases,” declared DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. “This is the most secure border ever.”
Noem’s enthusiasm is matched by CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott, who stated, “Our mission is simple: secure the border and safeguard this nation. And that’s exactly what we are doing.”
Scott added, “No excuses. No politics. Just results delivered by the most dedicated law enforcement professionals in the country. We’re not easing up — we’re pushing even harder.”
While Scott’s words brim with resolve, one has to wonder if this hardline approach will hold under inevitable political pressure—still, credit where it’s due, the results speak volumes.
President Trump has pardoned Rudy Giuliani and dozens of others who were charged over their efforts to challenge the 2020 election, the New York Post reports.
Trump said the 77 individuals were persecuted by the Biden administration for engaging in legitimate political advocacy after the fiercely disputed presidential race.
“This proclamation ends a grave national injustice perpetrated upon the American people following the 2020 Presidential Election and continues the process of national reconciliation,” Trump wrote in the pardoning document.
The federal clemency order does not have any effect on the state-level crimes the 77 people were charged with, but it could shield them from prosecution in the future, the New York Post notes.
The text of the pardon was shared by Trump's "clemency czar," attorney Ed Martin, who declared, "No MAGA left behind."
“This pardon does not apply to the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump,” Trump's pardon notes.
No MAGA left behind.
— Eagle Ed Martin (@EagleEdMartin) May 26, 2025
Those pardoned were indicted in states like Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan for their roles in coordinating alternate slates of pro-Trump electors, or so-called "fake electors."
15 of the people whom Trump pardoned had charges dismissed in September by a Democratically-appointed judge in Michigan, who found the so-called fake electors "were executing their constitutional right to seek redress."
The so-called "fake electors plot" was central to Jack Smith's federal case against Trump for "election interference," which was dismissed after Trump's triumphant victory in 2024.
While Trump's return to office has seemingly immunized him from prosecution, many of his allies continue to face legal exposure for their election advocacy - although the state-level cases have largely stalled.
In addition to Giuliani, some of the notable people on the pardon list include Trump's former chief of staff Mark Meadows, Trump election lawyer and constitutional scholar John Eastman, and Trump election lawyer Sidney Powell.
They were among the people, including Trump himself, who had their mugshots taken in Fulton County, Georgia as part of disgraced prosecutor Fani Willis' sprawling case for "election interference."
In addition to criminal charges, Trump allies have also faced legal sanctions including disbarment and hefty civil penalties for their election-related activities.
Giuliani recently reached an undisclosed settlement in a $1.3 billion case from Dominion Voting Systems, after previously settling with a pair of Georgia election workers who won a $148 million judgment against him.
In response to one commenter on X, Trump's pardon czar said the administration is working on helping Tina Peters, a Republican operative in Colorado who was sentenced to nine years in state prison for breaching voting equipment.
President Donald Trump, along with many other Republicans, is convinced that the Democrats are exploiting the Senate filibuster rule in a continued effort to stall or fight against Trump's agenda.
According to the Washington Examiner, as the president expresses increasing frustration at the Democrats using the filibuster, he pitched Republicans once again to consider "nuking" the filibuster, which, of course, comes with its own risks.
The president said in a recent post calling on the GOP to take action that he believes the filibuster is contributing to destroying the U.S. economy.
President Trump made it clear in a Truth Social post this weekend that he wants Republicans to end it. Now.
While Trump has made a number of suggestions regarding ending the filibuster, his most recent was straight to the point.
"The Democrats are winning in that they are destroying our great, miracle economy, which is exactly what they set out to do. TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER!" he wrote on his Truth Social account Saturday.
In another post, he made it even clearer, writing, "TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER!"
BREAKING 🚨 President Trump has a message for every Republican: “TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER”
IT’S TIME TO GET IT DONE IMMEDIATELY
TIME TO GET LOUD MAGA pic.twitter.com/VkiflXBRTH
— MAGA Voice (@MAGAVoice) November 8, 2025
On Friday, he had the same message to his followers and to Republicans, writing, "Republicans, Terminate the Filibuster and bring back the American Dream. If you don’t do it, the Dems will, and you’ll never see office again! President DJT."
Experts say that Trump's push to end the filibuster was ramped up in the wake of the latest election, in which Democrats scored predictable, but key victories in a variety of offices and states.
Users across social media reacted to Trump's latest call for the filibuster to be terminated.
"He’s right, the filibuster isn’t protecting democracy, it’s protecting the swamp’s deadlock. Democrats kill it the second it blocks their agenda, but Republicans freeze when it’s ours. Stop playing defense and govern like you mean it," one X user wrote.
Another X user wrote, "Trump’s right—time to clear the roadblocks and move."
Only time will tell if Trump can levy enough pressure to make it happen.
The Trump-Russia probe is probably one of the biggest scams in modern U.S. history, and the actors behind it, many of whom were top government officials, could soon face the music.
According to Fox News, a bombshell report indicated that several FBI officials, agents, and other agency heads have received or will soon receive federal subpoenas.
The subpoenas are reportedly part of the Department of Justice's efforts to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, which many believe was a politically driven attempt to destroy Trump to keep him out of the White House.
The probe, which was named "Crossfire Hurricane," was first opened in 2016 by former FBI official Peter Strzok.
Several former officials who were instrumental in bringing the Trump-Russia probe online have reportedly already received subpoenas. Those include Strzok and Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer.
Sources told Fox News Digital that the grand jury is out of the Southern District of Florida, and added that some 30 subpoenas are expected in the coming days.
🚨 ALERT: A Federal Grand Jury just SUBPOENAED John Brennan, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page 🚨@MirandaDevine says this is their “WORST NIGHTMARE” 🤯 pic.twitter.com/WtJ0tSUVTG
— Jesse Watters (@JesseBWatters) November 8, 2025
Former CIA Director John Brennan also received a subpoena, according to the report. The outlet noted that he was under investigation since this summer.
Fox News noted:
Strzok and Page first came under scrutiny in 2018 when Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz uncovered a series of anti-Trump text messages between them. Both were assigned to work on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team in 2017.
Page had resigned from the FBI in 2018 and Strzok was ultimately fired from his position.
Users across social media weighed in on the stunning news regarding the subpoenas.
"About time justice catches up to those Russiagate clowns. Finally holding the deep state accountable!" one X user wrote.
Another X user wrote, "Finally seeing justice chase the architects of that bogus Russia collusion hoax, as a Florida grand jury drags key plotters before the law with dozens more subpoenas incoming to expose the deep state sabotage once and for all."
It'll be interesting to see just how far this investigation goes and if anyone is actually held accountable. Only time will tell.