This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Then he suddenly starts shouting about 'DIGNITY'

Joe Biden, whose son Hunter has complained people don't want to pay him to speak any longer, this week got one of those speaking engagements.

He addressed a national conference of Advocates, Counselors and Representatives for the Disabled in Chicago on Tuesday.

And he spoke about being outraged as a 4th-grader back in Scranton, Pennsylvania.
"And I'd never seen – uh I'd never seen hardly any black people in Scranton at the time and I was only going on 4th grade. And I remember seeing the kids going by at the time called colored kids on a bus going by," Biden said, suggesting that "sparked his outrage."
He also randomly started screaming about, "SIMPLE DIGNITY. EVERYONE DESERVES TO BE TREATED WITH DIGNITY … REGARDLESS OF WHO THEY ARE."
He also lashed out at President Donald Trump.

"In fewer than 100 days, this new administration has made … has done so much damage and so much destruction."

He cited the thousands of federal workers whose jobs were eliminated at the Social Security Administration, accusing Trump of "taking a hatchet" to the federal workforce.

"Now they're getting ready to push thousands more out."

He also claimed that 30% of Americans now have "no heart."

"It's never been this divided."

A report at the Gateway Pundit pointed out it was his first major public speech since he left office, as his speech at the National High School Model United Nations last week was covered by "not one media outlet."

The report documented how Biden "struggled" in his speaking. And it noted how Biden's "outrage" as a 4th-grader "never happened."

Biden has a well-established reputation for telling stories that never happened.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Removal would have been proper in 'a number of cases in our history'

Facing a long list of federal judges who have ruled against his agenda, including judges with documented personal biases on the disputes, President Donald Trump erupted on social media when one demanded that terrorists being removed from its shores for the security of America be returned.

He called for the judge's impeachment.

And that prompted Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to scold, in a fashion.
Without mentioning the president, Roberts explained, "For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."

And that's right. Mostly. According to constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz.

He, in fact, said there are times when impeachment is the appropriate remedy.

"Impeachment is proper — Chief Justice [Roberts] is wrong when he says it's never proper for a decision — after the Dred Scott decision, for example, which declared black people not to be eligible for citizenship, impeachment would have been a proper remedy," Dershowitz said. "There have been a number of cases in our history where impeachment would have been a proper remedy, but not generally. Generally, appellate remedies are available, particularly in cases of this kind."

WND has reported that the judge criticized by Trump is James Boasberg, in Washington.

The president said on social media;

Boasberg interfered in Trump's responsibilities to make sure the U.S. is secure by opposing the president's decisions to deport a number of criminal illegal aliens, including some affiliated with a Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aregua, whose members are considered terrorists.

Over the weekend, Boasberg ordered a halt to those deportations. Further, he claimed the authority to order planes carrying those deportees that already had taken off, and were in international airspace, to be returned to the United States.

The Trump administration let the planes continue to their El Salvador destination, explaining that the judge's order didn't have any authority over international territories. Further, the judge's verbal order and subsequent written ordered were different.

WND reported further, investigative journalist Laura Loomer revealed there appears to be a huge conflict of interest for Boasberg, suggesting he should have, under ethics standards, removed himself from the case.
She explained, "Less than 12 hours after I exposed Judge James Boasberg's conflict of interest with his daughter Katharine Boasberg, who works for a 501c3 called 'Partners For Justice' @PFJ_USA that gives criminal illegal aliens and gang members legal advice, Katharine Boasberg has DELETED her @LinkedIn page and her Instagram account. I have exclusively uncovered a massive CONFLICT OF INTEREST involving Judge James Boasberg, the Chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Judge Boasberg recently made the decision to prevent the deportation of criminal illegal alien gang members on planes out of the country. This is enough for President Trump's legal team to push for a MOTION FOR RECUSAL for Judge Boasberg."

It's not the first time such a situation has arisen for a judge working on a lawfare case against Trump. When Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg wildly claimed that business reporting misdemeanors, for which the statute of limitations already had passed, actually were felonies and put Trump on trial, Judge Juan Merchan allowed testimony from a former porn star and a convicted perjurer to be used against Trump to obtain a conviction.

It also was revealed that Merchan's daughter is a Democrat operative who was advising campaigns, and making money off the decisions her father was making against Trump in court.

Boasberg is continuing his agenda this week, demanding the Trump administration answer his questions about why it didn't order the airplanes to turn around mid-flight, exactly what time they took off, and more.

He is insisting his "equitable powers" should attach to a plane even if it has departed the U.S. and is in "international airspace."

Trump has been using the Alien Enemies Act and other federal laws to deport known criminal illegal aliens.

The unprecedented work by trial court judges to block Trump's agendas, including deporting criminal aliens, eliminating fraud, waste and corruption in the executive branch spending, and more, already is being described by analysts as a constitutional crisis for the country.

The Washington Examiner explained, "A grave threat to democracy was revealed during the first weeks of President Donald Trump's second term. But it does not emanate from the White House. Judges, acting in coordination with left-wing activist groups, are abusing the judicial power to thwart the will of the people and undermine temperate and deliberate jurisprudence."

Already some of the questions, especially about nationwide injunctions from local judges, have been submitted to the Supreme Court.

The report explained, "The power of courts to enjoin parties from taking action to prevent harm to a litigant is older than the Constitution, stretching back to English common law. This tradition is preserved in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which allow a party to secure a preliminary injunction if he establishes that 'he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest.'"

It continued, "This is a high bar. It typically means a court's power to limit a party's actions is confined to named plaintiffs in the suit. This can make challenges to federal government actions tricky because any national policy, such as a nationwide employer vaccine mandate, could affect almost everyone."

Nationwide injunctions historically have been used rarely, except against President Trump, who has been targeted by dozens and dozens from often leftist judges.

The Supreme Court, in fact, has expressed concern over the multitudes.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Top author exposes the deep rot in academia, including Harvard's defense of plagiarism and the Marxist ideologies undermining our education system

Dr. Carol Swain's story is proof that the American dream is real – but it's under attack.

From growing up in poverty to earning degrees from top universities, she defied the odds through hard work and faith, only to face the corruption of elite institutions firsthand.

In her latest book, "The Gay Affair," she exposes the deep rot in academia, including Harvard's defense of plagiarism and the Marxist ideologies undermining our education system. If we don't fight back, we risk losing our nation's future.

Now is the time to stand for truth, demand accountability, and take control of our children's education. Read "The Gay Affair" and join the fight to restore integrity in America.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

By Matt Bailey, WorldNetDaily Washington correspondent

U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer declared DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency, a "shadow government" at a Monday news conference on Capitol Hill.

Schumer and others from the Democratic caucus had gathered the media to discuss the Elon Musk-helmed agency gaining access to the Treasury Department's payment system.

The five gathered Democrats – Sens. Schumer, Ron Wyden, Elizabeth Warren, Patty Murray, and Brian Schatz – argued DOGE had no authority to access the payment system. They claimed Musk had "illegally" accessed the system.

At one point, Sen. Warren claimed that DOGE had "raided" the Treasury to gain access to the system. As of this reporting, that is not accurate, and it appears Treasury Secretary Scott Bissent has cooperated with DOGE's efforts to access the Treasury.

The Democrats also argued President Donald Trump has no authority to interfere with congressionally approved funding.

Unfortunately for the senators, this is incorrect. In fact, the DOGE office is a reworking of an Obama-era agency known as the United States Digital Service. Just as with DOGE, the Digital Service was created unilaterally by the president.

What was on display today was a reaction to Trump doing exactly what he said he would do: cut the government down to size and get it to work for the American people. Elon Musk claims to have already found what he's calling "fraudulent" payments that Treasury officials were directed to hand out, no questions asked.

Donald Trump has created an agency whose sole job it is to look under the hood of government institutions. This has establishment bureaucrats on both sides of the aisle terrified, and for good reason.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

President Donald Trump is withdrawing America support, again, from the United Nations' Human Rights Council, according to a Politico report.

He also is pausing funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency that was set up specifically to give money to Palestinians, an organization that was revealed to have had employees take part in the Oct. 7, 2024, terror attack by Hamas on Israel.

The publication said it obtained a document outlining the plans.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Tech companies across America were surprised this week by a Chinese announcement about an artificial intelligence advance, and industry-wide, stocks were off a couple of percentage points.

One report described the industry as "freaking out" and another said the stocks "crashed," although the industry itself was off only a modest amount and even individual stocks in companies that were impacted directly by the development were off only about 10% or thereabouts.

The word was that Chinese artificial intelligence firm DeepSeek had "leapfrogged" U.S. performance for AI.

The Nasdaq Composite of tech companies was down 3.4% and the Dow was off 180 points.

It was DeepSeek, launched only a week ago, that announced it had succeeded in building an AI model on a "shoestring budget."

DeepSeek reported of its language model to generate human-like conversation.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The latest outbreak of what is a growing problem – schoolchildren accessing X-rated and other explicit content on school iPads or websites – has left a government education official demanding action.

It is the Christian Institute that is reporting the Scottish Government's education secretary is calling for action, following an episode where children as young as 10 in Edinburgh were able to access porn on school iPads.

Jenny Gilruth, MSP, contacted local councils across Scotland to ensure that "safety protocols are regularly reviewed" to guarantee that the issue "is not replicated in other parts of the country," the institute reported.

One parent confirmed that students as young as 10 and 11 were able to view explicit images like "erotic hanging, strangulation and drowning … and theoretically unlimited porn" by misspelling blocked terms, the report said.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Supplicants are defined as a "person making a humble or earnest plea to someone in power or authority."

Or, according to Steve Bannon, a former strategist for President Trump, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos.

They are the leaders of SpaceX and Twitter, Facebook's empire, and Amazon – all billionaires a hundred times over or more.

They have been given seats at today's presidential inauguration for Trump, to his second term in office, and they are now, in Bannon's description, seeking favor from the new president.

"As soon as [Mark] Zuckerberg said, 'I've been invited. I'm going,' the floodgates opened up and they were all there knocking, trying to be supplicants. So I look at this and I think most people in our movement look at this as President Trump broke the oligarchs, he broke them and they surrendered."

It was noted that, for a time, the social media companies banned Trump from being on their sites. He ended up creating the competing Truth Social at that time.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The status of a Palestinian "state" is the core issue around which much of the violence – the repeated terrorist assaults on Israel – has revolved for years.

That's even though there are multiple Arab states just over the national boundary.

But a new treatise developed by Alan Dershowitz, the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, emeritus, at Harvard Law School, has identified the reason that the Palestinians don't have the "state" that they demand.

It's because they have refused it. Over and over.

Dershowitz explains, at the Gatestone Institute website, that the Jews in the Middle East previously "agreed to Palestinian statehood," again and again.

"In 1937-1938, 1947-1948, 1967, 2000-2001, and 2007. In each case, it was the Palestinian leadership that refused to agree to the two-state solution," he documented.

Back in 1937, before the Jewish state was declare, he said, "the Arabs categorically rejected (the Peel partition plan), demanding that all of Palestine be placed under Arab control and that most of the Jewish population of Palestine be 'transferred' — ethnically cleansed — out of the country."

At that time, the Palestine Royal Commission Report found that because of the "general hostility and hatred of the Jews by the Muslims," sharing a land was ruled out.

"Nor could the Jews be expected to accept Muslim rule over them," since Arab leaders, at that time, were allied with Adolf Hitler.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

'These companies should only be maximizing returns for investors, not working to advance their radical climate change agenda by leveraging their holdings and pressuring American energy companies'

Multiple states have joined in a lawsuit against several major investors in the coal industry taking their climate change ideology too far – and threatening the nation's energy supply.

Fox News reports Wyoming, Texas, West Virginia, and eight other states have gone to court against BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, charging the industrial investing giants bought into and then used their leverage with various coal companies to "artificially" limit the industry.

"These companies should only be maximizing returns for investors, not working to advance their radical climate change agenda by leveraging their holdings and pressuring American energy companies," charged West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey.