This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Not only did White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt point out to reporters in the briefing room on Tuesday that some of their outlets had been lying about the president, the White House followed up just hours later with a list of new lies that appeared in publications.

In her first briefing, she said, "I vow to provide the truth from the podium, we ask all of you in this room to hold yourselves to that same standard."

But she wasn't done: "We know for a fact there have been lies that have been pushed by many legacy media outlets in this country about this president, about his family, and we will not accept that. We will call you out when we feel that your reporting is wrong or there is misinformation about this White House. So yes, I will hold myself to the truth and I expect everyone in this room to do the same."

Just hours later, the evidence appeared, in a statement from the White House Office of Communications.

"President Donald J. Trump has been subjected to more manufactured Fake News hoaxes than any president in history, and it hasn't gotten any better in his second term. Here are just a few:"

Then it listed a "hoax" from Sens. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., and Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, "and media outlets" who claimed the president's directive to "pause radical, wasteful government spending means an end to Medicaid, food assistance, and other individual assistance programs."

The facts are that "Individual federal assistance programs — such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, and other important programs — are explicitly excluded, as was made clear by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and a memo from the Office of Management and Budget. Only unnecessary spending — such as DEI, the Green New Scam, and funding nongovernmental organizations that undermine the national interest — are included in President Trump's directive," the statement said.

Then Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, a Democrat, and officials at Chicago Public Schools were called out.

They "claimed, without bothering to verify, that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents had conducted a 'raid' at a local elementary school — a false claim echoed by media outlets, including the Chicago Tribune."

What happened, actually, was an investigation by the U.S. Secret Service of a threat "unrelated to immigration."

Then another "hoax" appeared on the list, from a purported "physicians advocacy group" expressing opposition to Trump's nomination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.

"FACT: The 'advocacy group' is an astroturfed partisan organization funded by prominent left-wing donors — and accepts fake signatures," the White House said.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

JERUSALEM – An Iranian author and political commentator who recently spoke in the Qatari capital Doha, has caused no little consternation in his home country after he expressed "awe" at the number of young Iranians who "hate Palestinians."

"You'd be surprised today," Sadegh Zibakalam, who is also a professor at Tehran University, said in a video shared by Iran International. "Since Oct. 7, 2023, you'd be surprised at the number of Iranian who HATE Palestinians. What happened to that sympathy? It's gone – it's evaporated."

More shockingly still it was not just the apparent pent up hatred of Iranians toward Palestinians, but they also praised Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a kind of hero. He said he would have thought the person who told him such a thing as a prediction 15 months ago was out of their mind or talking nonsense. "But I saw it with my own eyes during the past 15 months, the degree of hatred of younger generation of Iranian against Palestinian. And their hero was Netanyahu."

He added, "Do you think they knew anything about Netanyahu and the Likud party, and the Hamas? No, no. They hate Palestinians because the Islamic leaders – they support Palestinians."

Last month, a viral video circulated on social media, showing a high school principal in Iran trying to get his students to chant,"Death to Israel," and, "Death to America," while the students instead replied, "Death to Palestine," reported Israel National News.

Iran's population of some 90 million people is young, with the median age being 33. It isn't too difficult a proposition to understand where Iran's young people are coming from; they have endured a teetering economy bent to the will of the mullahs in Tehran, which has been under the downward pressure of crippling sanctions – until the Biden administration hiatus – and might soon be again. While their own economy is deprived, the IRGC has spent billions of petrodollars on the vaunted "ring of fire" foreign policy to encircle Israel, and which the Jewish state managed to dismantle in large part – although by no means completely – in a few short weeks.

True to form, officialdom in Tehran was unimpressed with Zibakalam's pronouncement, with the Prosecutor's Office filing charges against the commentator.

"Due to recent baseless statements made by Sadegh Zibakalam, the Tehran Prosecutor's Office has filed charges against him," Mizan, Iran's judiciary news website, said on Tuesday, without providing further details of the charges.

The charges come after a video of his lecture, titled "The Trump presidency and the 46 years of hostility between Iran and the US," was widely shared on social media, according to Iran International.

"More than being worried about Trump and what Trump is going to do with Iran, I am worried about the situation in Iran – the sharp contradiction, the sharp conflict between the younger generation of Iranians and their hatred of literally anything which is tied to the Islamic Republic," Zibakalam said in a lecture at the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies in Doha on President Trump's inauguration on January 20.

The commentator has previously been sentenced to 18 months in prison and a two-year ban from political activities for "propaganda against the system."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

First Liberty Institute has dispatched a letter to a Connecticut school district suggesting that it reconsider its demands that a devout Catholic teacher purge her workspace of a crucifix – or get fired.

"Requiring a teacher to purge their workspace of anything religious is blatant discrimination that violates the First Amendment," explained Keisha Russell, a senior counsel at the legal organization.

"The Supreme Court said in the recent Kennedy decision that teachers have the right to engage in personal religious expression under the Free Exercise Clause, including when students are present."

The institute said it sent a letter to officials at the New Britain School District on behalf of Marisol Orroyo-Castro, who has been a teacher for three decades.

The letter calls on the district to reinstate her, after she was placed on administrative leave for refusing to "remove a small crucifix from her workspace."

The legal team explained:

Marisol has taught in the Connecticut public schools for 32 years. For the last 10 years, she has placed a crucifix by her desk along with other personal items such as student artwork and a church calendar. As a devout Catholic, the crucifix reminds her to pray and helps her remain calm throughout the day as she faithfully teaches her students.

On Friday, December 6, 2024, she was brought into a meeting with the vice principal and abruptly told that unless she removed the crucifix by her desk by Monday morning she would be disciplined for insubordination. She was later told she could put the crucifix in a drawer or under her desk, so students wouldn't see it.

After she did so, Marisol started to sob, feeling as though she "hid it under a bushel," rather than let her light shine. After many tears and prayer, she returned the crucifix to its original location. She was then suspended without pay for two days during the holiday season as the school waited for her to comply and hang the crucifix under her desk in a place the school administration called her "private space." Now, she is on administrative leave during the grievance process. The school district said it is considering whether to terminate Marisol.

The lawyers noted that other teachers are allowed to display photographs of family and friends, images of Wonder Woman and Baby Yoda, a miniature of the Mona Lisa, promotions for the New England Patriots football team, inspirational quotes and much more, including a mug referencing a Bible verse.

But the district won't tolerate a crucifix.

In the letter, the attorneys explain, "Under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and under the Connecticut Constitution, the District may not abridge its employees' free speech rights, nor their rights to freely exercise their religion."

Then the letter cited the Kennedy precedent from the U.S. Supreme Court.

"Fewer than three years ago, in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, the Supreme Court held that a public school football coach could not be fired for engaging in personal prayer, even when he did so visibly at the 50-yard line of the stadium after home games."

First Liberty Institute also represented Kennedy in that case.

Fox reported First Liberty Institute is working with WilmerHale law firm on the case.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

JERUSALEM – Argentina's President Javier Milei, whose style of governing has seemingly completely revolutionized the South American country, recently declared the death of a prominent prosecutor investigating the July 1994 terrorist bombing of the downtown Buenos Aires Argentine-Israelite Mutual Association, to be an act of murder.

The case remains one of the most bitterly divisive in Argentina, with the previous government's insistence that Alberto Nisman, who was found dead on the floor of his apartment's bathroom exactly ten years ago in January 2015, had committed suicide being strenuously denied by those who knew him. The failure to bring anyone to justice either for the original bombing – which claimed the lives of 85 people and until Oct. 7 was the single greatest number of Jews murdered since the Holocaust – or Nisman's death is a stain on Argentina's law enforcement and judicial system.

Beyond that, Iran's dirty fingers were assessed to have been behind the attack – via its Lebanese proxy Hezbollah – and getting to the bottom of both of these cases has significant ramifications for both Argentina in particular and South America in general.

Milei's interjection could be crucial. As a vocal supporter of Israel and Jewish causes, Argentina's president's pressure may just produce some results. He said Nisman's death was at the "hands of the darkest forces of power."

It would seem simply too neat that merely days after Nisman accused then-Argentina president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and several other ex-government officials of seeking to cover up alleged Iranian involvement in the bombing, he would take his own life. Indeed, the special prosecutor was found dead the night before he was due to testify about his allegations in Congress.

A new report, presented by a federal prosecutor one week ago, supports the hypothesis that Nisman was murdered because of his work with the AMIA Attack Investigation Unit, which sought to identify the terrorists behind the bombing.

"The executive branch remains confident the judiciary will continue its investigations so that Prosecutor Nisman's murder does not go unpunished," said Milei's government in its statement Saturday.

It also called for the continuation of "the lines of investigation into Nisman's complaint."

Nisman's former wife, San Isidro Federal Judge Sandra Arroyo Salgado, commented on the anniversary in a radio interview, in which she said she did not understand Kirchner's "attacks on her family," and reiterated her contention Nisman, from whom she was divorced in 2012, had "managed to shed light on the responsibility of high-ranking officials of the then-government of the Islamic Republic of Iran." And in the same interview, she pulled no punches as to the fate of her ex-husband, asserting it "has been scientifically and judicially proven with evidence since 2018 … that his murder is linked to his role in the investigation into the terrorist attack on the AMIA."

For her part Kirchner, upon whom Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, tried to impose congressional sanctions in 2023 having labeled her a "convicted kleptocrat who has been indicted for obstructing investigations into Iranian terrorism" did not directly respond to Milei's assertions, merely sharing a post on X from her acolyte Oscar Parrilli, who asserted Nisman's death was a suicide.

There are far-reaching implications for Milei's intervention and the shift in emphasis. There is his own personal statement, who becomes the highest-ranking official to accept Nisman was murdered. It will also test Kirchner's resolve to continue to insist the prosecutor took his own life. And beyond that there is a geo-political dimension, which puts a most unwanted focus back on the Islamic regime in Tehran.

"In early 2007, President Nestor Kirchner chalked up his first success when Interpol issued "red notices" – alerts for internationally-wanted fugitives – for six Iranian officials, including Ahmad Vahidi, who today serves as the Iranian regime's Interior Minister," according to the Foundation for the Defense of Democracy's Ben Cohen, writing in the New York Sun. "As his investigation progressed, Nisman also uncovered valuable data about the extent of Iranian operations in Argentina and across Latin America," he added.

Kirchner could count on the support of former Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez, and one wonders whether he might have been included in those "darkest forces of power" Milei referenced in his statement. His successor, Nicolas Maduro, who despite election losses is still clinging to power, recently labeled Milei a "Zionist" and a "Nazi."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The federal government's orchestrated "shock and awe" campaign against the Jan. 6 protesters is over, with President Trump's pardon or sentence commutations for some 1,500 or 1,600 people targeted by Washington.

But it may be rebounding against the FBI and other agencies that participated.

"The shock may be gone for these defendants, but it may only be beginning for the Justice Department and the FBI," warned constitutional expert Jonathan Turley.

The federal government essentially had admitted it wanted to scare and intimidate Americans after those protesters gathered in Washington on that day and objected to what they viewed as a skewed president election.

Evidence later confirmed their concerns, as the $400 million plus that Mark Zuckerberg handed out to election officials who often used it to recruit Democrat voters was revealed as an undue influence.

Further was the undue influence of the FBI's decision to interfere with the results. That bureau claimed, falsely, that the Biden family scandals uncovered in the laptop computer Hunter Biden abandoned were Russian disinformation, when they all were true.

But while most of the protesters simply walked into the Capitol building and later left, some acted on their rage, vandalizing and even physically confronting police and security.

The government responded with a campaign to scare as many Americans as it could.

Turley explained, "Four years ago, the Justice Department set out to send a chilling message to the nation. In an interview with CBS News a year later, Justice Department official Michael Sherwin indicated that they wanted to send a message with the harsh treatment of defendants."

Sherwin had confirmed, "our office wanted to ensure that there was shock and awe … it worked because we saw through media posts that people were afraid to come back to D.C. because they're, like, 'If we go there, we're gonna get charged.' … We wanted to take out those individuals that essentially were thumbing their noses at the public for what they did."

The DOJ did this by keeping people in prison for offenses like trespassing. Government lawyers insisted that defendants be kept behind bars, sometimes in gruesome circumstances, for years awaiting trial. Then they enhanced charges and demanded lengthy prison sentences.

Turley confirmed the widespread opinion that those who engaged in violence should have been arrested and punished.

But he said the "excessive treatment of some of the January 6th defendants undermined the credibility of their prosecutions for many."

"The Justice Department rounded up hundreds and, even though most were charged with relatively minor crimes of unlawful entry or trespass, the Justice Department opposed the release of many from jail and sought absurdly long sentences in some cases," he said.

He cited the case against "so-called QAnon Shaman."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Joe Biden, when he took office on President Donald Trump's departure in 2021, said he wouldn't use pardons like Trump.

Trump did, in fact, pardon a couple of dozen people, mostly during his last few days in office.

They included Stephen Bannon, Dinesh D'Souza and Joseph Arpaio, all longtime supporters.

The rest ranged from fraud cases to conspiracy to obstruction to bank robbery to illegal voting.

At the time, Biden was asked in an interview whether Trump's use of "preemptive pardons" concerned him.

"It concerns me in terms of it uh, what kind of precedent it sets and how the rest of the world looks as us as a nation of laws and, uh, injustice," he said. "Um. You're not going to see in our administration that kind of approach to pardons."

However, his intentions fell by the wayside in the real world, much like his repeated promises to Americans that he would not pardon his son, Hunter, of the gun charges on which he was convicted, or the tax charges to which he pleaded guilty.

He did.

And he pardoned a long list of other supporters, such as Anthony Fauci, the members of the J6 investigation commission, virtually all of his family members – James Biden, Frank Biden, Valerie Biden Owns, John Owens and Sara Biden – who may have been caught up the long list of Biden family schemes, Gen. Mark Milley.

He also commuted the life sentence of Leonard Peltier, in jail for nearly five decades for the 1970s killings of two FBI agents.

Earlier, in multiple orders, he also had pardoned or commuted the sentences of thousands of federal inmates, including several dozen convicted killers who were awaiting the death penalty.

Biden, justifying his actions, said, "I believe in the rule of law, and I am optimistic that the strength of our legal institutions will ultimately prevail over politics. But these are exceptional circumstances, and I cannot in good conscience do nothing."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Not many American taxpayers would refuse this deal: Their boss says they can cut their work time by 20% and keep the same pay and benefits.

But likely not many would demand that.

But a coalition of "progressive" staff members on Capitol is making that exact demand, a plan that would cost taxpayers the same in salary and benefits but would dramatically reduce the work load, by giving those employees a 32-hour work week instead of 40.

The Washington Examiner has documented that the "Congressional Progressive Staff Association" has written to Congress to insist on less work for the same pay.

The letter claims the move would increase staff retention, prevent burnout and serve as a national model.

The Examiner said it obtained a copy of the letter that explains that congressional work is "demanding and intensive" because they have to draft legislation, and analyze it. And meet with people, and communicate with constituents.

The report explained, "The association is an official staff organization to advance the progressive movement and advocate for Capitol Hill employees. The group formed in 2021 and currently has a membership of over 1,500."

The organization previously worked to orchestrate a $45,000 salary floor.

The letter complains some staff members already are looking for other jobs "earlier than they would in a more predictable and sustainable work environment."

The move comes after leftists in Congress, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Mark Takano, D-Calif., have made similar proposals legislatively.

The staff association claimed, "Working 32 hours, employees have a more substantial reprieve from work and therefore are able to complete the same tasks in less time."

Social media concluded that the association's members were "tone-deaf and lazy."

"Why not be bold and ask for a 0-hour workweek? I wonder how blue-collar Americans would feel about white-collar workers demanding a 32-hour workweek," said Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Two teen girls in Louisiana have been charged with a felony for trying to "frame a male high school teacher for sending inappropriate messages to a student."

Details about the case have been released by Craig Webre, the sheriff for Lafourche Parish.

On Jan. 6, 2025, each girl was charged with one count of false swearing for the purpose of violating public health or safety, a felony, cyberstalking, and online impersonation, the law enforcement report said.

They were placed on electronic monitoring and released to the custody of their parents.

Webre said, "Our juvenile detectives are diligent and take claims of inappropriate behavior very seriously. They are, however, equally serious about false claims. Someone's life can be instantly ruined by a false allegation, and I am proud that our investigators were able to get to the bottom of this.

"Technology has made it very easy for people to try to manipulate the truth, but technology also makes it easy for investigators to ultimately find the truth," he said.

Local school Supt. Jarod Martin said, "We are shocked and appalled to learn of the actions of two of our students. The allegations against one of our teachers were false and malicious, and we appreciate the efficiency of investigators in uncovering the source of these messages.

"Such attacks on a teacher's credibility and reputation are concerning and can inhibit their ability to effectively educate our children. We are committed to investigating all allegations of misconduct in order to provide a safe environment conducive to learning and working for all of our students and staff."

The investigation into the case was opened only a week before Christmas when there was a report from "a concerned party" that a teacher was "sending inappropriate messages to a 16-year-old female student."

The sheriff explained, "Detectives learned she and a 15-year-old friend were allegedly engaged in conversations involving inappropriate messages from the teacher via an online instant messaging platform."

The investigation included interviews with those involved, search warrants being issued for the contents of phones and various messaging accounts, and more.

"The investigation revealed that the two teenage girls had fabricated messages, created fake accounts, and shared screenshots with friends in an effort to frame the teacher for sending inappropriate messages," the sheriff's office said.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

JERUSALEM – The new year is barely one week old and there have already been several events whose potential political fallout is immense. However, Justin Trudeau's plummet from grace has nothing on one of the unlikelier headlines to emerge in the last 24 hours, namely British-American influencer Andrew Tate's apparent intention to run for prime minister of the United Kingdom.

Tate took to X to launch the BRUV party – Britain Restoring Underlying Values – which he claimed was aimed at restoring the "once Great Britain." He made another radical claim; namely that if change had not been effectuated within 45 days, he would step down.

"No delays," he wrote on X. "Bruv" is also a slang term, like "bro," in the U.S. and is most commonly heard in the south of the country, particularly certain areas of London.

"This is a war to reclaim Britain," the home page for the charter states. "No excuses, no compromises, no second chances. We will defend our borders, crush crime, purge corruption, and restore pride to a nation under siege."

"Britain will rise again – stronger, unyielding, unapologetic," it added. "If you want safety, power, and freedom, join the fight. The time for talk is over. It's action or nothing."

There were immediate teething troubles for the @votebruv handle on X, as the account was suspended within hours of its launch. Tate wrote personally to X CEO Elon Musk to say they had broken no rules. Some three hours later, Musk personally responded to Tate to say the handle was back up, saying he was not sure why it was suspended.

One of the BRUV party's charter's main ambitions is to center its primary alliance with the United States, "Not E.U., not U.N., not NATO and not WHO," according to Tate.

Also in the charter was a commitment to harsher migration policies and a reduction in knife crime, which is particularly prevalent in large swaths of the capital, London, through stricter punishment and and deterrence strategies, such as through live telecasting solitary confinement of knife-crime offenders.

Tate also called for reform of the British Broadcasting Corporation, which he labeled a "rotten institution," while accusing them of "sexual abuse scandals," "allegations of child exploitation," and "reports of pornographic content."

This particular comment seems like an exhibit of Chutzpah 101, as Tate – who self-identifies as a misogynist, who has been recorded as saying women should "bear responsibility" for sexual assault, has been credibly accused, along with his brother and confidant, Tristan, of trafficking at least one underaged girl, as well as sexual misconduct.

The most recent British election was in 2024, and officially, if the government maintains its enormous working majority of more than 300 seats, there need not be another one until 2029. While there is currently enormous pressure on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, especially over his personal handling of the Muslim rape gangs issue, and his and his party's deep unpopularity, things will remain as they are for the foreseeable future.

Tate's alleged bid is a curious one. The U.K. system is nothing like the U.S., where a complete outsider such as Donald Trump, could descend the golden escalator in 2015 and announce his candidacy for the Republican nomination, and eventually win.

Over the years there has been the odd member of Parliament who won a seat having stood as a protest candidate against an unpopular incumbent, but there is no comparison as to what would be required for a brand new party to sweep to power. Look at Nigel Farage. He started his political career largely in protest at Britain's continued presence in the European Union. It was only after he had already become a Member of the European Parliament and stood in numerous U.K. general elections that he finally won his own parliamentary seat in the 2024 election.

While it is true things move much more quickly these days and the reach someone like Tate would have among disaffected voters – particularly young working-class men – is significant, it seems difficult to believe he could ever have enough support to sweep to the top job, especially in a country in which he would likely be immediately arrested if he returned.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

JERUSALEM – Elon Musk is using the time he has before officially starting his role as co-head of the Department of Governmental Efficiency in the U.S. to maintain the pressure on Labor leaders – both past and present – in the United Kingdom over the national disgrace of the largely Pakistani Muslim rape gangs, which targeted thousands – potentially hundreds of thousands – of white working-class girls and young women.

Musk has called for the United Kingdom’s current Prime Minister and Leader of the Labor Party Sir Keir Starmer, who was a former director of Public Prosecutions from 2008-2013, to be jailed for his role what the Tesla CEO clearly views – along with millions of others – as one of the most shameful events in recent British history.

However, he was not done there, and took aim at Britain’s former Prime Minister and Chancellor of The Exchequer under Tony Blair’s government, Gordon Brown. When Blair resigned as PM in 2007, it was under Brown’s leadership that Starmer was the most senior lawyer in the country.

On Monday, Starmer responded to Musk’s posts on X, denouncing them as “poison for the far right.” He accused people such as Musk and those supporting Tommy Robinson of spreading “lies and misinformation” as far and as wide as possible, alleging they were “not interested in the victims,” but rather being out for themselves. He added they were “not interested in justice… these are people who are trying to get some vicarious thrill from street violence, which people like Tommy Robinson promote.”

 

Earlier, Musk retweeted an X post from account called “Basil the Great,” which showed a picture of a younger Brown with a direct quote from a Home Office memo circulated at the time the then-prime minister was in power. Above it he wrote but one word, “Disgrace.”

“We believe they have made an informed choice about their sexual behavior and therefore it is not for your police officers to get involved.” This was backed up with the reemergence of a video of ex-police officer Dion Miller, explaining exactly this in a short clip. In yet another X post, Musk accused Brown of committing “an unforgivable crime against the British people.”

 

Last week, Musk criticized Starmer for the first time over his handling of the issue, including expressing his dismay at the Labor government’s refusal to acquiesce to the establishment of a public inquiry. This message was actually delivered by Labor’s safeguarding minister (whatever that is supposed to be) Jess Phillips, with Musk accusing Starmer of being “complicit in the rape of Britain.”

Nigel Farage, the Reform U.K. party MP for Clacton, who was involved in his own spat with Musk despite defending the billionaire, over the former’s remark he should be replaced as his faction’s leader, claimed Starmer had ignored a whistleblower, who had tried to present him with clear evidence of the scale of the problem. Farage pledged a national inquiry to investigate these horrific crimes if his party was to win the next general election.

One of the people who has managed to bring this issue to the fore after years of trying is Maggie Oliver, another former police officer – a detective – who resigned from Greater Manchester Police in 2012. She also pointed the finger at the prime minister, adding both the Conservatives and Labor were to blame.

 

Whether Musk should embroil himself in U.K. national politics is somewhat of a moot point. He has an enormous platform and is helping to shine a bright light – the heat of which clearly makes the British Prime Minister incredibly uncomfortable – on an issue, which both sides of the aisle have made toxic, a political third-rail, only touched at one’s own peril.

However, Starmer’s rejoinder that Musk is pandering to the far-right is to use a British idiom, “weak tea.” In some ways, the fact this issue has been hushed up by both Labor and the Conservatives for decades, gives the lie to this particular line of argument.

For a premier seemingly in as much political difficulty as Starmer is, it would likely serve him better to come up with a more muscular defense of why there should not be a public inquiry, rather than hurling epithets at the world’s richest man.

© 2025 - Patriot News Alerts