This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A Democrat party star, considered in leftist circles to be a rising personality with surging influence, has been caught with thousands of dollars in unpaid condo assessments.
Even as U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, has attracted the attention of the Federal Election Commission for spending nearly $75,000 of donor money on luxury hotels, transportation and security in recent months.
It is Fox News that uncovered the unpaid lien of more than $3,000 against her luxury condo in Dallas.
"A notice of a lien filed on April 11, 2024, which is publicly available on the Dallas County Clerk's website, shows that Crockett owes the Westside Condominium Association a total of $3,047.79," the report confirmed.
It was explained that Crockett "is in default in her obligation for payment of assessments and has failed and refused and continues to fail and refuse, despite demand upon her, to pay the Association assessments and related charges properly levied against the Property."
WorldNetDaily recently reported on Crockett's wild claims about baby Jesus and the Republican Party.
Her comments included, "The fate of baby Jesus may have been very different if Republicans were in charge some 2,000 years ago. … This is the [Republican] party that says that they care so much about life until life actually shows up at their front door."
She added, ""And this is also the party that is supposedly about Christianity and I just imagine what they would have done to a little baby Jesus but that's a whole other issue."
Crockett was discussing a report last week claiming hundreds of immigrant children were being held in federal detention centers.
Further, Crockett recently claimed that Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin received money from deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and then refused to back down when shown she was wrong.
Crockett made the false suggestion on the House floor Nov. 18, but the contributions in question were from a different Jeffrey Epstein. On MS NOW's (formerly MSNBC) "The Weekend," host Jacqueline Alemany offered Crockett a chance to correct herself, but the congresswoman declined to retract her accusation.
WATCH:
"You made a little bit of news last week when you mistakenly accused Lee Zeldin and other Republicans— " Alemany said before Crockett interrupted to clarify her accusation was not an accident. Alemany then explained that Federal Election Commission (FEC) data showed Zeldin and other Republicans she accused did not take money from the deceased sex offender.
"I want to give you the opportunity to amend that," the host said.
"I have no amendments," Crockett replied before repeating her defense that she did not have enough time to verify which Epstein made the contributions.
Crockett's blunder was because her online research led her believe that Zeldin got a campaign donation from Jeffrey Epstein, and he did. But this Epstein is a physician, not the notorious sex offender.
The Fox report noted Crockett bought the condo in 2014 and is registered to vote there.
It's in a "gated community that offers residents a 'refreshing retreat' and 'comfort and convenience in a secure setting.' The complex is complete with a pool, clubhouse, sleek kitchens and bathrooms 'designed with spa-like features,'" the report said.
Fees range up to $403.
A Democrat strategist, who remained unidentified, told Fox, "The more we learn about Jasmine Crockett, the more clear it is that she's the worst possible candidate to run for Senate in Texas."
The report noted she recently got attention for FEC filings confirming she spent tens of thousands of dollars on luxury hotels and such.
Locations included Martha's Vineyard, Chicago, New York City, Las Vegas, San Francisco and Los Angeles, among other major cities.
She represents a district that includes Dallas.
The report noted her earlier blunders include attacking Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, who is paraplegic and uses a wheelchair, calling him "Governor Hot Wheels."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
When it comes to celebrating Christmas, the White House has always been one of the historic places Americans can look to for beautiful displays and decorations – and this year is no exception.
Since 1961, when Jacqueline Kennedy first introduced an official Christmas theme for the White House, the first lady has taken charge of decorations. This year social media users are highlighting the start difference between Melania Trump's decorations and greeting versus that of former first lady Jill Biden.
Here is Mrs. Trump's video from X, in which she announces this year's theme, "Home Is Where the Heart Is":
"The video includes beautiful music, tasteful decor, and even prominently features the nativity," notes Not the Bee.
"But we must never forget what we suffered through when former first lady Jill Biden was running things. … You had the tacky streamers and weird circus theme:"
Two years ago, Mrs. Biden raised more than a few eyebrows with a video featuring a fanciful video take on the Christmas classic ballet "The Nutcracker."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The National Education Association has been revealed to be planning to double down on gender fantasies with a training session, scheduled in just weeks, that is to teach the best practices for imposing gender pronouns, ways to battle "transphobia," and more.
In a document posted online, the NEA revealed a slate of "training" programs that are coming, including a session named "Advancing LGBTA+ Justice," which is set Dec. 2-4.
"Understanding this community and their issues are critical to providing support and guidance that is not only inclusive but liberating," the labor organization announced.
It is a report from Fox News that explains the union's goals, even while teachers' groups are facing criticism across America for the low numbers of students performing basic language and math requirements at grade level.
It is, after all, conservative opponents who are the "villains," the literature claims.
The union plans include setting up "common understandings about the identities under the LGBTQ+ community umbrella" and establishing "shared understanding" as well as addressing "micro-aggressions and stereotypes."
The report explained that Defending Education, an education transparency advocate organization, accessed a "pre-attendance package" and "participant handouts" for the "Advancing LGBTQ+ Justice and Transgender Advocacy."
"The documents are littered with far-left agenda items, including a guide for members who are potentially going through a gender transition at work taken from the Cornell University 'Transgender Guide To Transitioning & Gender Affirmation,'" the report explained.
There's guidance for "coming out" at work and "transitioning at work" and laments that the union's opponents win the argument over allowing males in sports, lockers and showers, for females.
The organization admitted, "Our base and persuadables want to support transgender student athletes, but are extremely susceptible to our opposition's argument that excluding trans youth is necessary to protect the fairness of women's sports."
Then it cites the benefits of having biological males in women's or girls' sports, the report said.
Kendall Tietz, investigative reporter at Defending Education, told Fox News Digital that the NEA is sending the wrong message to both educators and students with the training agenda.
"Every time we get a look behind the curtain at the National Education Association, its priorities are unmistakable: a race-based, gender-ideology-driven model of activist education," Tietz said.
There's a great deal of anger addressed at conservatives, the report said, as a handout charges, "The right has exploited ignorance about transgender people and our lack of an affirmative, race-forward message to advance anti-trans attacks, further splinter and impugn the left, and sabotage progressives on a broad range of issues."
The NEA further identifies its enemies, with, "Name the villains who violate our values, expose their motivation of getting back into or holding onto power, and position them as a barrier to what our families need."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Already, Larry Summers, who was Bill Clinton's treasury secretary and held a position in Barack Obama's administration, Virgin Islands delegate Stacey Plaskett and Obama's White House counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler, all Democrats, have been confirmed to have been interacting with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Now there's another: current House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. That's according to U.S. Rep. James Comer, R-Ky.
A report at PJMedia opined, "The Democrat Party's house of cards just took a fresh round of demolition, courtesy of the latest Jeffrey Epstein revelations. Last week, Democrats released a few select and doctored Epstein emails, hoping to destroy Trump. Then the GOP released over 20,000, and suddenly, one Democrat after another found themselves wrapped up in the Epstein fallout."
The report explained Epstein "was not simply on the fringes of the party; he was on the radar of the Democrat establishment, even after his 2008 conviction."
It's because that email shows a Democratic consulting firm reaching out to Epstein in the hope of securing his attendance at a Jeffries campaign event.
Comer confirmed, "Another email shows Democrat fundraisers invited Epstein to an event or to meet privately with Hakeem Jeffries as part of their 2013 effort to win a majority. So Hakeem Jeffries' campaign solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein. That's what we found in the last document batch."
It was Lisa Rossi of Dynamic SRG, a fundraising group for Democrats, who promoted, to Epstein, Jeffries as "Brooklyn's Barack."
"Comer posits that this is likely the reason why Jeffries has refused to condemn Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-Virgin Islands) for colluding with Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing with Michael Cohen. Text messages show Epstein closely following Plaskett's questioning during Cohen's testimony and even helped steer her approach," the report said.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Joe Biden's "puddles" agenda for water rules now is under fire from Environmental Agency chief Lee Zeldin.
It is the Waters of the United States rule that left an Idaho couple facing fines of up to $33,000 a day for starting to build a home on a residential subdivision land plot in Idaho.
The U.S. Supreme Court earlier reversed the outcome in that case, involving the Sackett family.
But Zeldin is working on a revamp of the regulation that was adopted during the Nixon administration under the Clean Water Act to control wetlands.
The Barack Obama and Biden administrations expanded the definitions of "navigable waters" to the point landowners feared the EPA "could swoop in at any moment and usurp control of their lands," according to a report at Fox News.
Zeldin explained, "When it comes to the definition of 'waters of the United States,' EPA has an important responsibility to protect water resources while setting clear and practical rules of the road that accelerate economic growth and opportunity."
Obama had grabbed vast new powers under the law, before Trump during his first term in office restored them to working definitions, the report said.
But Biden again expanded the federal government's reach.
Under his standards, low spots that collected puddles "could be found to have a 'significant nexus' to navigable water," the report said.
Zeldin said the goal now is to deliver on a Trump administration promise to make regulations clear while also protecting the nation's waterways.
The EPA said nine "listening sessions" were held and the conclusions offered were that commonsense guidelines were needed.
Now being developed are definitions for "relatively permanent" waterways, "tributary" and more.
"Wetlands" now in fact must be "wet" for a minimum time each year.
"Democrat administrations have weaponized the definition of navigable waters to seize more power from American farmers, landowners, entrepreneurs, and families," Zeldin said. "We heard from Americans across the country who want clean water and a clear rule. No longer should America's landowners be forced to spend precious money hiring an attorney or consultant just to tell them whether a Water of the United States is on their property."
WorldNetDaily reported over the years on the Sackett fight. The Supreme Court eventually gave the Idaho couple, Chantell and Mike Sackett, victory in their years-long fight with the Environmental Protection Agency.
It agents claimed their residential building land in Priest Lake was protected "wetlands" even though it wasn't wet, wasn't attached to navigable waters and was surrounded by homes on other lots.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The terror-infested United Nations Relief Works Agency, which long has held power in the Middle East, processing and allocating aid to a Palestinian population in Gaza beleaguered by the terrorism of Hamas, is demanding a central role in plans to rebuild the region.
The demands come as a multi-stage peace plan created by President Donald Trump begins to take effect, even despite outbreaks of violence that still are occurring.
Reports reveal that UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini is demanding authority in the rehabilitation program, stating, "UNRWA, with its thousands of Palestinian personnel, has the capacity, expertise and community trust required to provide healthcare, education and other public services to a devastated population."
In a commentary, he demanded, "For decades, the agency's teachers, doctors and engineers have formed a vital part of a functioning system of public services for millions of Palestinian refugees in Gaza and the region."
Problematic, however, is the fact that Secretary of State Marco Rubio already has described the UNRWA as a "subsidiary of Hamas," the terror organization that launched its war against Israel in 2023, invading and killing some 1,200 innocent civilians and kidnapping hundreds more.
The last of those hostages just were released in recent days, and even now the bodies of some of the hostages who were murdered have yet to be returned.
Rubio said, of plans to rebuild in Gaza, "UNRWA's not going to play any role in it The United Nations is here. They're on the ground. We're willing to work with them if they can make it work, but not UNRWA. UNRWA became a subsidiary of Hamas."
A new report posted at CBN explains that an investigation, 10 years long, has "uncovered the truth about terrorist infiltration and indoctrination within UNRWA. UN Watch discovered that 500 employees of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian refugees were 'involved in terrorism. incitement, and membership in extremist organizations.'"
That means that international aid to Gaza, if UNRWA gets its way, would be directed to members of terror organizations.
The report continued, "UN Watch asserts that it conducted 10 years of research, discovering that nearly 500 UNRWA employees were involved in terrorism, incitement, and membership in extremist organizations. The group is calling on the United States to 'take definitive action to dismantle UNRWA.'"
UNRWA has claimed the allegations are not true.
"But one year ago, Israel passed a law banning UNRWA's operations with Palestinians, thereby ending its cooperation with the agency, which had begun in June 1967," the report said.
"Here at CBN News, we've reported for years on how UNRWA has educated young Palestinians to wage jihad against Israel. In one of our reports, David Bedeen of the Center for Near East Policy Research displayed a page from a textbook used by UNRWA featuring imagery of a female terrorist," CBN confirmed.
Bedeen said, "This is Dalal Mughrabi, who murdered 36 Jews in a terror attack in 1978. And she's glorified in this book, and there's a whole curriculum for her run by UNRWA."
U.S. taxpayers had been funding the UNRWA at the rate of about $400 million a year, until Trump's administration froze those payments when he took office for his second term.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A riot erupted outside a scheduled Turning Point USA event at UC-Berkeley on Monday, leaving participants bloodied – and under arrest.
A report at the New York Post explained Frank Turek and Rob Schneider were scheduled at the event, marking the end of the "This is The Turning Point," tour.
Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk was assassinated two months ago at an earlier event on the tour in Utah.
"During the brawl, two men were seen fighting each other, one of whom had blood gushing from his face. Video taken by Fox News Digital also shows a crowd of agitators gathering around the fight. Many demonstrators wore keffiyehs and carried signs with left-wing messages," the report said.
Police donned shield masks and brandished batons to try to bring the rioters under control.
Officers also confirmed there were arrests.
Leftists have organized under the slogan Antifa, for anti-fascist, but have adopted the very ideology of fascism, through attempts to suppress the speech rights of others, and impose their beliefs on everyone.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
President Trump has issued pardons to Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows and dozens of alternate electors who worked to make sure America's election processes would be followed should Democrat schemes that appeared during the 2020 presidential race prove to have corrupted the voting.
While the legacy media to this day still claims they were "false" electors, those individuals simply were following a process long established in American elections to set up alternate slates of presidential electors when the results of those votes are clouded with doubt, scandal and controversy.
A report at the Federalist explains while legal challenges to various state election results were under way, the individuals met and cast votes as alternates, supporting President Donald Trump in that scandal-plagued 2020 vote.
That was when Mark Zuckerberg interfered in the election by handing out hundreds of millions of dollars to elections officials who often used the flood of cash to recruit voters in Democrat districts. Further, the FBI interfered by falsely claiming scandals revealed in the laptop abandoned at a repair shop by Hunter Biden were Russian disinformation.
So while various controversies were raging, both Democrat and Republican organizations offered slates of elections to the Electoral College.
"Those actions were taken based on sound historical and legal precedent, and ensured that legislatures in the Challenged States could select the rightful winner of the Election in the event the legislatures or the courts determined there had been a flawed calculation of votes or an unconstitutional deviation from state election law resulting in the wrong electoral votes being counted.," explained a recommendation from the Office of U.S. Pardon Attorney Edward R. Martin.
He stressed legal challenges to various "unconstitutional changes to election laws, procedural violations, ineligible voters, and election irregularities" raised alarms.
Others in the pardons list were former law professor John Eastman; lawyers Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis; and Kenneth Chesebro and Boris Epshteyn.
The Federalist explained the process used simply mirrored one used by the campaign of John Kennedy in 1960 when the acting governor of Hawaii certified the Republican electors for Richard Nixon.
"There, as in Trump's case, Kennedy had filed a challenge to the results in state court, and accordingly Democrats certified three alternative electors to cast their ballots for Kennedy in the event the court ruled in his favor," the report explained.
"Two of the three Democrat electors were retired federal judges and yet they certified — as did the Trump alternative electors — that they were 'duly and legally qualified and appointed' electors for Kennedy. The Democrats further certified 'the votes of the state of Hawaii' were given to Kennedy. Kennedy later prevailed in his legal challenge, with his alternative electors then casting their votes in his favor," the Federalist explained.
However, when similar circumstances developed in the 2020 election, ex-FBI chief Christopher Wray and then-Attorney General Merrick Garland launched numerous "criminal" investigations of individuals, claiming that their efforts were "fraudulent."
Despite the processes being routine, and historic, legacy media outlets to this day claim that those individuals were trying "to overturn the outcome" of the election.
CBS referred to the individuals as "so-called" alternate state electors.
The pardon document confirmed it is done to end "a grave national injustice perpetrated upon the American people following the 2020 Presidential Election and continues the process of national reconciliation."
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt explained that it was persecution against those Americans, and Joe Biden put them "through hell."
Democrats' schemes to make similar claims against President Trump failed in federal court earlier this year.
While some of the cases against the Trump supporters developed in state courts, results that a president cannot pardon, some of those have been dismissed and others are on appeal.
The list included a total of 77 people who had been targeted by Democrats.
State officials involved in the attacks on the Republican-named electors included Arizona AG Kris Mayese, Nevada AG Aaron Ford, Michigan AG Dana Nessel, Wisconsin AG Josh Kaul and the now-disgraced Georgia prosecutor Fani Willis.
Martin had explained that the prosecutions are "attempts by partisan state actors to shoehorn fanciful and concocted state law violations onto what are clearly federal constitutional obligations of the 2020 Trump campaign: the establishment of the contingent electors, the actions attendant to their roles as presidential electors, and their duties under established historical and legal precedent to exercise their responsibilities as electors – all of which are functions of federal – not state – law."
"The memorandum noted because the states are prosecuting the 2020 Trump electors, and those connected to the decision to use alternative electors, for exercising a solely federal function, the president of the United States can pardon them for their supposed state law crimes. This novel theory seeks to sidestep the normal limitation on the president's pardon authority — an authority limited to pardoning individuals for solely federal crimes," the Federalist explained.
Now, the report noted, "The Democrat attorneys general behind the prosecutions may not wish to push the matter because doing so could expose either their complicity with the Biden administration or with Democrat activists. Fulton County Prosecutor Fani Willis already learned that lesson when her efforts to prosecute the Georgia electors and Trump attorneys led to the discovery that 'both the Fulton County prosecutor and her paramour-paid junior prosecutor engaged with Biden administration officials both before and after obtaining the indictment.'"
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Muslims follow the Quran, which instructs them to behead Jews and Christians. Many Muslim organizations around the world even today include in their agenda the destruction of Israel – and Jews.
So now that a radical Muslim has been elected mayor in New York, which has one of America's largest populations of Jewish families, the Anti-Defamation League has confirmed plans to watch him.
His agenda already is known to include a wide range of pro-communist points, as Zohran Mamdani openly has declared his allegiance to "democrat socialism" including ideals like high taxes, government-owned stores, reduced property rights and massive government controls. He waited only hours after his election to start telling people he needed more money and to send it to him.
"We are deeply concerned that those individuals and principles will influence his administration at a time when we are tracking a brazen surge of harassment, vandalism and violence targeting Jewish residents and institutions in recent years," explained Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief of the Anti-Defamation League, one of the nation's biggest organizations promoting Jews.
He accused Mamdani of promoting "anti-Semitic narratives" and showing "intense animosity toward the Jewish state that is counter to the views of the overwhelming majority of Jewish New Yorkers."
A report from the Center Square explained what's being launched is called the "Mamdani Monitor" to check on anti-Semitism.
The ADL described the effort as plans to scrutinize Mamdani appointees "and review the funding of organizations tied to the Israel-critical administration to gauge hostility to Jewish people," the report said.
A phone hotline to report offenses also is in the works.
Mamdani faces open doubts about his actions because of his "alignment with pro-Palestinian groups, criticism of the Israeli government, and his use of the phrase 'globalize the intifada,' which has been linked to acts of violence against Jewish people," the report confirmed.
He also brazenly posted a photograph of himself with Siraj Wahhaj, who was linked to those behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
Also of concern is his "previous" support for the anti-Israel Boycott Divestment and Sanctions agenda.
"We will hold the Mamdani administration accountable to this basic standard," said Greenblatt. "If New Yorkers experience anti-Semitism, where they work or where they worship or where they shop or where they socialize, tell us at ADL, and we will make sure that the authorities follow up."
The report noted the New York Board of Rabbis has warned that Mamdani "holds core beliefs fundamentally at odds with our community's deepest convictions and most cherished values."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Republicans routinely collect about 35% or 40% of the vote in elections in far-left California, while Democrats get about 60%.
That was the breakdown in the 2024 presidential election in which loser Kamala Harris got the 60% and 40% went to Trump, who went on to win the nationwide vote in a landslide.
But Democrats in control for years in the state already have gerrymandered the congressional district lines so they would control 43 House seats, allowing Republicans only nine.
Now, pushed into the fight by Gov. Gavin Newsom, voters have allowed the all-Democrat legislature to gerrymander even more, this time trying to take another five seats away from the Republicans.
That would mean 40% of the population is represented by only four seats in the House, or less than 10% of the state's delegation.
Such is democracy in leftist California.
But, in fact, the state, only hours after the vote became final, got sued over the "unconstitutional" plan.
A report at the Washington Examiner said, "Republicans claim in a lawsuit that the new map that will be enacted as a result of Proposition 50, giving Democrats five more favorable congressional districts, is unconstitutional. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by the Dhillon Law Group on behalf of the California GOP. The lawsuit claims that the new maps illegally use voters' race to draw new districts."
Already, the 60% of the population that generally votes Democrat controls 43 of the state's 52 House seats.
Redistricting based on race, according to the courts, isn't allowed by the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause because race is considered a "suspect class."
Even the Supreme Court has signaled limits, including time limits, on such political activism.
According to California Assemblyman David Tangipa, "When I said that the fight for California has just begun, I hope everybody and anybody knows I meant that."
He said Newsom's realignment of the House seats is "completely diminishing the voices of other groups to benefit other groups."
Meaning Republicans are being silenced to benefit Newsom's Democrats.
Newsom announced his scheme after Texas, which largely is GOP territory, finished a routine redistricting plan that does give GOP candidates a preference in some districts.
The report explained, "Democrats said the lawsuit is an example of Republicans dismissing the will of California voters."
But actually, if that is the case, it would be dismissing only the partisan will of some Californians, as the state's Republicans aren't likely to push for fewer representatives from their party and more Democrats.
It is unclear whether the legal fight will result in an injunction that would prevent Democrats from taking advantage of their new power structure immediately.