This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Multiple radicals have unleashed their violence on American university campuses this week, and whether it's part of the leftist agenda that put Muslim "democratic socialist" Zohran Mamdani into the office of New York City's mayor or not, it's causing alarm.

In both cases students displayed hatred and vulgar language (be forewarned about videos) and attacked conservative expressions simply because the statements were being made.

One was at what apparently was a Steven Crowder event at the University of Oklahoma.

Caught taking down signs about the event, the unidentified girl swatted a phone from a man's hand, suggested obscene actions and more.

Online were dozens of calls for her arrest and expulsion.

One said, "She needs to learn that she can't assault people and have zero consequences. If she does not get taught this lesson she will do it again. Every time she does it and there are no consequences it is a green light that it is ok and to escalate."

And, "Wow! She needs an intervention."

And, "These are the people that vote for a communist in New York."

Another message asked the school for a comment.

Constitutional expert Jonathan Turley highlighted the other situation, at Oklahoma State, where a radical insisted she had the right to shut up anyone with a message she dislikes.

"You don't deserve a conversation," she said.

Turley said it was a "student" that was "trashing" a table at the Young America's Foundation event.

The students had set up a table to support traditional marriage.

The radical student then "tossed their material and claimed the absolute right to vandalize opposing views on campus," he wrote.

"Notably, one of the students involved in the attacks insisted that only the government is prevented from trashing such tables and, as a private citizen, she had a right to do so. The sense of license to do so has been drilled into these students by both educational and political figures. This is a face of rage."

He said in this situation, like the other, the question is what will the university do about the attack.

"This type of political violence or vandalism should be anathema to an institution of higher education. This is not free speech, as the student claims. It is the denial of the exercise of free speech. The student has every right to set up her own table or protest the YAF. What she is not allowed to do is attack other students or their displays.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Ex-FBI chief James Comey, charged with lying to Congress, insists that he's being selectively and vindictively prosecuted and that he never committed the offenses.

But a trove of evidence released in response to his claims by prosecutors undermines his case.

U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan filed a response to Comey's demand that the court dismiss his indictment for vindictive prosecution.

And it includes "bombshell, damning evidence" in his own handwritten note on FBI letterhead confirming his knowledge of and participation in "the Russian collusion criminal conspiracy against Trump."

The exhibits include statements from Comey, "from his burner gmail with his alias Reinhold Niebuhr, that, 'At this point it would shouting into the wind. Some day they will figure it out. And as Jack and Ben point out, my decision will be one a president elect Clinton will be very grateful for (though that wasn't why I did it).'"

He also, responding to a planted New York Times hit piece against Trump, told "FBI special government employee Daniel Richman, 'Well done my friend. Who knew that would. E so uh fun."

Richman was the tool Comey is accused of using to leak government secrets to the media.

"Exhibit 10 shows FBI special government employee Daniel Richman (aka 'Michael Garcia') is leaking–as an anonymous source–to New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt on behalf of then-FBI Director James Comey. Comey testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee he never did this," reports explain.

report at the Gateway Pundit explains that federal prosecutors have confirmed they have a "trove of personal emails" with Comey openly talking, before the 2016 election, how he expected to work for "president elect" Clinton and he "was being kept apprised by a top FBI aide on efforts to anonymously provide information to the news media."

The report called the court filing responding to Comey's demand the case be dismissed a "bombshell."

"Halligan cited and attached to the filing numerous emails in which Comey was clearly aware that Richman was working to provide information anonymously to news outlets about the Clinton email case and that he expected those outreach efforts would end with Clinton defeating Donald Trump in the November 2016 election," explained Just the News.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

SNAP is back, according to confirmation from the White House, but its benefits now are being cut in half because of the Schumer Shutdown. And the White House has advised the judge who ordered all of the available reserves be spent there's now no way to address any emergency.

The government's SNAP program, basically food stamps for tens of millions, was closing down on Nov. 1 when its money ran out because of the government shutdown demanded by Democrats in the U.S. Senate.

While the GOP proposed a clean funding resolution, continuing the spending as it had been for several weeks, Democrats demanded the government raid Americans' paychecks for $1.5 trillion for broadcast propaganda, health care for illegal aliens and more.

GOP members in the Senate, and the White House, said that was impossible, so the government shutdown is into its second month.

Leftist groups sued when they realized food stamps was going bust, and a judge ordered the White House to spend down to nothing all the reserves.

The Washington Examiner reported Trump will "deplete" the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to provide half benefits for November.

"The [plan] will leave a total of $4.65 billion in the contingency fund for November SNAP benefits that will all be obligated to cover 50% of eligible households' current allotments," Agriculture Department spokesman Patrick Penn explained.

"This means that no funds will remain for new SNAP applicants certified in November, disaster assistance, or as a cushion against the potential catastrophic consequences of shutting down SNAP entirely," Penn charged.

It was Judge John McConnell who had said the administration must use contingency funding for November, and claimed that the government could shift funding around to obtain more, a move the White House rejected.

Penn said the government could not access other USDA funding, such as the Child Nutrition Fund, because that would just move the problem "to millions of America's low-income children."

Those funds, he told the judge, are not "a contingency fund for SNAP."

The White House explained earlier it was not allowed to use the contingency funding because that was designated as a reserve for emergencies such as natural disaster.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Secular educators in the United Kingdom have decided to apply "trigger warnings" to parts of the Bible.

And Andrea Williams, chief of the Christian Legal Center, said it's crazy.

"Applying trigger warnings to salvation narratives that have shaped our civilization is not only misguided, but absurd. Singling out the Bible in this way is discriminatory and deeply ill-informed. To suggest that the crucifixion story involves 'sexual violence' is not just inaccurate, it's a profound misreading of the text.

"The account of Jesus's death is not a tale of trauma, it is the ultimate expression of love, sacrifice, and redemption, central to the Christian faith," Williams said.

It is the Christian Institute that reported English literature students at the University of Sheffield now are being told to prepare for "graphic bodily injury and sexual violence" in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.

Same warning for Genesis, where the lives of Cain and Abel are documented.

It was just a year ago that Nottingham University put itself up for mockery when it said the "expressions of Christian faith" in medieval literature were potentially distressing.

Officials at Sheffield said, "A content note is a standard academic tool used to signpost when sensitive or graphic content will be discussed. Its purpose is to ensure subjects can be highlighted and discussed openly and critically, while preparing students who might find such details difficult."

But Angus Sauil, of the Christian Institute, pointed out, "Neither the Gospels nor Genesis give explicit accounts of Abel's murder or Jesus' crucifixion, and what the 'sexual violence' label refers to is mystifying. While Christians and unbelievers alike can be profoundly moved by the powerful and enduring words of Scripture, such passages are far less explicit than many of the set texts English Literature students come into contact with."

He continued, "What people are more likely to find offensive in the Bible are its bold assertions: that there is one God; that all have sinned and fall short of his glory; that Jesus Christ is God; that he died to offer forgiveness and eternal life to all who believe in him and repent; and that salvation is only possible through him. Such truths are offensive to many, but they are a tremendous blessing to those who believe. The only 'trigger warning' the Bible needs is 'This book may completely transform your life.'"

The Nottingham controversy, earlier, had the school telling students "Chaucer and his Contemporaries" contained "incidences of violence, mental illness, and expressions of Christian faith."

According to the Daily Mail, Monsignor Michael Nazir-Ali, the former Anglican Bishop of Rochester who converted to Catholicism, said, "Students have to be exposed to what is unpleasant and frightening so they can learn to deal with that. The Bible is very restrained in how it describes both the murder of Abel by Cain and the crucifixion, particularly if you compare the accounts of the Evangelists with something like Mel Gibson's 'The Passion of the Christ.'"

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has called for the immediate impeachment of an anti-Trump federal judge who has been revealed to have taken part in a scheme to spy on the telephone records of a long list of sitting U.S. senators.

It is Judge James Boasberg who is the subject of criticism.

He's already, according to an analysis by experts, been revealed as a judge who made himself "like a foreign diplomat" in insisting the Trump administration following his agenda on foreign affairs.

Boasberg long has fought President Donald Trump's efforts to secure the nation's borders and remove illegal alien criminals.

He's gone so far as to try to enforce his own order despite a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court overturning him.

He was the judge who even tried to order Trump to tell airplanes carrying illegal alien criminals, that already had left American airspace, to return to the U.S. with the criminals.

Now Cruz is calling for action regarding the political activist sitting as a judge.

The senator's comments came following revelations that the Biden administration, with Boasberg's cooperation, issued hundreds of subpoenas for telephone records of Republicans under its scheme to create a number of lawfare cases against Trump – and other Republicans.

Online commenters have suggested the investigation, run by ex-special counsel Jack Smith, was intended to create additional charges against Trump and other GOP leaders should Kamala Harris have won the 2024 election. She failed.

Cruz turned fiery during a news conference about Biden's "Arctic Fost" investigation.

"The Biden Justice Department signed off on issuing subpoenas for the phone records of at least nine U.S. senators. Twenty percent of the Republicans in the United States Senate were the target of this fishing expedition. They did so in complete contravention of the Constitution—of separation of powers, of the Speech and Debate Clause, of free speech, of basic rights of privacy," Cruz charged.

He continued, "I want to talk to you about one of those subpoenas. One of those subpoenas went from Jack Smith to AT&T, seeking my cell phone communications. It went to AT&T, and I actually want to commend AT&T for doing the right thing. AT&T is based in Texas. AT&T looked at that subpoena, and they went to their legal counsel and said, 'What should we do with this subpoena?' And their legal counsel said, 'You cannot comply because this is protected by the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution.' And so AT&T declined to comply—did not hand over my cell phone records. Now, one might ask: ordinarily, a phone company being asked to hand over the phone records of a sitting senator would notify that senator."

But the company didn't, as Boasberg, "ludicrously" claimed, in support of a gag order, that there were "reasonable grounds" to think disclosure would lead to "destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses, and serious jeopardy to the investigation."

Cruz called out the judge.

"Now, I can tell you right now, there is precisely zero evidence to conclude that I am likely to destroy or tamper with evidence or to intimidate potential witnesses. Zero evidentiary basis for that. This order is an abuse of power. This order is a weaponized legal system," the senator charged.

He said the judge's actions are a textbook case of abuse.

"I am right now calling on the House of Representatives to impeach Judge Boasberg. Judge Boasberg put his robe down, stood up, and said, 'Sign me up to be part of the partisan vendetta against 20% of the Republicans in the Senate.'" Cruiz said. "That is a dereliction of duty and a violation of the judicial oath."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

In a stunning development in President Donald Trump's war on illegal and dangerous drugs that are being pushed into America, the aide to a Democrat governor has been arrested on suspicion of cocaine trafficking.

The aide to Gov. Maura Healey, a Democrat in Massachusetts, was fired immediately.

report from Fox News said it was LaMar Cook, 45, of Springfield, who pleaded not guilty at his arraignment and was ordered held without bond.

The report noted investigators intercepted packages with the drug "slated to be delivered to a state office building where he worked," the report confirmed.

Cook, before his arrest and dismissal, was deputy director of Healey's Western Massachusetts office, the report said.

An official in the governor's office, confirming the immediate firing, said, "The conduct that occurred here is unacceptable and represents a major breach of the public trust. This criminal investigation is ongoing, and our administration will work with law enforcement to assist them in their work."

Local prosecutors confirmed that 21 kilograms of cocaine had been seized, including eight during the interception during a delivery at the Springfield State Office Building.

Fox explained, "The investigation stemmed from two prior drug seizures. Authorities intercepted and searched two suspicious packages at Hotel UMass (University of Massachusetts Amherst) in Amherst on Oct. 10 and found about 13 kilograms of suspected cocaine."

The suspect previously worked at that location.

Prosecutors continued, "Evidence collected during that operation was consistent with the narcotics recovered during the most recent controlled delivery in Springfield."

Trump's war on drugs has included missile strikes on many boats that were caught en route to the United States with loads of drugs. The smugglers, in those strikes, sometimes have been killed.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A congressional report has found that Joe Biden's aides arranged for the autopen signings of executive actions, directed policy and orchestrated his public appearances, literally exercising presidential authorities without his knowledge or consent, as his cognitive decline advanced.

The 90-page report, "The Biden Autopen President: Decline, Delusion, and Deception in the White House," charges that Biden's close associates actually ran the government during his final months in office.

U.S. Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., the chief of the House Oversight Committee, concluded the findings have raised "constitutional and criminal concerns" about actions "Biden" took while in office.

report at Fox News said the committee has demanded a complete investigation into the autopen signatures that Biden's associates arranged.

"Faced with the cognitive decline of President Joe Biden, White House aides — at the direction of the inner circle — hid the truth about the former president's condition and fitness for office," charged the report. And there was a "haphazard documentation process" for pardons made by Biden.

The committee said those procedures "left room for doubt over whether the former president made those decisions himself," the report said. In fact, the report simply said those actions now are "void."

"In the absence of sufficient contemporaneous documentation indicating that cognitively deteriorating President Biden himself made a given executive decision, such decisions do not carry the force of law and should be considered void," committee members concluded.

"The Department of Justice should immediately conduct a review of all executive actions taken by President Biden between January 20, 2021, and January 19, 2025. Given the patterns and findings detailed herein, this review should focus particularly on all acts of clemency. However, it should also include all other types of executive actions."

Further, the report raised concerns about Hunter Biden's influence, since former Biden chief of staff Jeff Zients has told investigators he was in the room for many discussions, including the preemptive pardons issued to Biden's family.

Comer's report said, "Zients testified that President Biden included his son, Hunter Biden, in the decision-making process for and meetings about pardons. This apparently included the meeting to discuss the pardons of five Biden family members, Dr. Anthony Fauci, General Mark Milley, and the members of Congress who served on the Select Subcommittee to Investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol, and their staff."

A Biden regime spokesperson told Fox News Digital the investigation was "baseless," even though 14 witnesses testified to Oversight, mostly top Biden aides.

Even during that testimony, Comer suggested, the aides were hiding things.

"Throughout the Committee's investigation, senior Biden White House aides presented a perspective of President Biden's cognitive health completely disconnected from that of the American public," the report said. "Not one of the Committee's 14 witnesses was willing to admit that they ever had a concern about President Biden being in cognitive decline. In fact, numerous witnesses could not recall having a single conversation about President Biden's cognitive health with anyone inside or outside of the White House."

According to a report in the Washington Examiner, Comer's report found, "Biden's aides misled the American people and hijacked the powers of the presidency. … Executive actions performed by Biden White House staff and signed by autopen are null and void."

For example, the committee found 32 of 51 clemency warrants were signed by autopen, "without any contemporaneous documentation linking Biden to those discussions," leaving no evidence the president agreed to the actions.

The Examiner explained, "A Jan. 19 episode detailed in the report describes a 'game of telephone' in which chief of staff Jeff Zients authorized the autopen for a final batch of pardons, including for his son Hunter Biden and four other family members, as well as Anthony Fauci, and Gen. Mark Milley, based only on secondhand accounts of a meeting he never attended. An aide emailed approval from Zients's account, initialed 'JZ,' without confirming with Biden directly, according to the report."

The report also criticizes ex-White House physician Kevin O'Connor, Biden's longtime doctor, "noting that he had 'business dealings with and financial connections to President Biden's family.' Investigators said those ties, combined with political incentives to keep Biden viable for reelection, created 'a motive to conceal the president's decline while running the government in his stead,'" the Examiner explained.

Comer's report also revealed former aides confirmed an entire system of pre-scripted press cards, controlled questions, teleprompter use, schematics outlining the number of steps he would take and the time he would use during any public appearance.

Democrats on the Oversight Committee cited Biden's own statements rejecting evidence he was unaware of decisions, and said the Republican report is conjecture.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A suburb of Atlanta is being challenged for a scheme it created that allows anyone to silence the speech of anyone else, if they don't like the speech.

The dispute, which appears to be a direct challenge to the First Amendment, erupted because someone objected to the Christian message being offered on a city street, and with a city permit, by preacher Jason Cantrell.

It is the American Center for Law and Justice that explained he has, for years, shared the Gospel on a public sidewalk outside an abortion business.

"He preaches to passersby and offers encouragement and prayer to women entering," the organization said.

Like many speaking in public areas, where street noise and more can interfere, he used, with a city permit, a small system to amplify his voice.

This summer, Forest Park police issued him a citation anyway.

He was cited "after officers claimed he had been asked three times to turn the volume down. The problem wasn't that Jason didn't have a permit – he did. Instead, the city's permit includes a troubling clause stating that it becomes 'null and void' if any complaints are received about the noise level," the legal team noted.

The officers simply declared his permit void and ticketed him.

"In other words, the city has created a system in which anyone who dislikes a message can silence a speaker simply by complaining. That is not how the First Amendment works," the ACLJ explained.

Under the city's scheme, "officials have made lawful speech entirely contingent on whether listeners react favorably. Once anyone complains – regardless of whether the sound exceeds legal limits – the city automatically treats the permit as void. That means police can punish a speaker who was fully in compliance with the permit's terms, simply because others objected to the message being spoken," the ACLJ noted.

That's called a "heckler's veto" and long has been demanded by critics of Christian messaging, but also long has been struck down by the Supreme Court.

"The Constitution does not allow speech to be restricted based on listener reaction or public hostility," the legal team said, and the Forest Park plan "does exactly" what the high court has forbidden.

Cantrell's efforts to follow the requirements were confirmed because the city renewed his permit even after police ticketed him, although the faulty condition remained.

"Jason's case underscores how such policies operate in practice. When the government ties speech rights to audience approval, unpopular or religious expression will always be the first target. A preacher's message about faith or the sanctity of life may be deeply meaningful to some and uncomfortable to others – but under our Constitution, discomfort is not a basis for censorship," the ACLJ said.

While Cantrell now faces a misdemeanor municipal court case, the ACLJ said the problem is far bigger.

"The First Amendment guarantees that government officials cannot suppress speech simply because someone complains about it. That protection applies equally to street preachers, political advocates, and protestors of every viewpoint. Forest Park's policy violates those principles by giving private citizens – and by extension, the government – uncontrolled discretion to silence speech they dislike."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

One of the revelations about the corruption involved in Jack Smith's lawfare against President Donald Trump during Joe Biden's time in office was that the federal government was weaponized to spy on the telephone records of Republican senators.

That scheme now has resulted in a pledge by one of those senators, Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., to sue.

report from Just the News notes that phone records of multiple senators were seized by Smith during that time frame.

He had brought several lawfare cases against Trump, and internet commentaries suggest he wanted to file more cases against Trump, and he might have been collecting information on GOP senators in order to create a larger case by naming more defendants.

Blackburn, in a statement to Just the News, confirmed, "The infringement is deep and wide."

The actions violated her personal civil liberties and her protections as a member of Congress, the report said.

She cited the 1st and 4th Amendment protections of free speech and privacy, her separation of powers protections and even the Stored Communications Act because her carrier Verizon "retained and turned over information on her geographic locations when she made calls," the report said.

She charged that Smith and his minions in the federal government, under Biden, misbehaved badly.

"I can assure you this, we will be suing the Biden DOJ, Jack Smith and his CR-15 team, which, of course, has already been fired by (current FBi Director) Kash Patel, thank goodness," the senator said.

"These guys just hated Donald Trump, and they hated us because we supported Donald Trump, and we were standing with Donald Trump."

She continued, "The common thread that runs through this is all eight were Republicans. We all supported President Trump, and we had valid questions about the outcome of the 2020, election."

She said, "It just shows you how Jack Smith and Arctic frost, they were so out over their skis, and they were out to get President Donald Trump, and they wanted to convict him of conspiracy. And of course, when you look at what they were doing with us, they were probably looking for obstruction or co-conspirator charges…"

WND previously reported that Smith's targets believe he should be disbarred.

It was the New York Post that confirmed a letter from elected officials, led by Blackburn, to Attorney General Pam Bondi, accuses Biden's DOJ of having "spied on duly elected members of Congress."

It demands that Smith be investigated by the Office of Professional Responsibility.

"As part of Jack Smith's weaponized witch hunt, the Biden DOJ issued subpoenas to several telecommunications companies in 2023 regarding our cell phone records, gaining access to the time, recipient, duration, and location of calls placed on our devices from January 4, 2021, to January 7, 2021," Blackburn charged.

The letter continued, "We have yet to learn of any legal predicate for the Biden Department of Justice issuing subpoenas to obtain these cell phone records."

Other lawmakers joining the demand were Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., and Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, and Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Penn.

Smith is accused of using his power as a government appointee to infringe on the constitutional rights of elected officials and "trampled on this separation of powers principle that underlies our system of government."

The lawmakers continued, "This is especially true given the invasion of our privacy was directly connected to our core legislative functions protected by the Speech or Debate Clause of our Constitution. To the best we can tell, Smith's team went on this fishing expedition for one simple reason: we are Republicans who support President Trump."

They asked for Smith to be referred for disbarment to the Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility and the New York Attorney Grievance Committee, since he is licensed to practice law in both states.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Casino gambling was approved by voters for the historic Colorado mining towns of Black Hawk and Central City some decades ago.

Since then, there have been many controversies over the industry that is given to installing Las Vegas landscapes at the 8,000-foot elevations of the Colorado foothills towns.

For example, the historic Lace House, in the way of one casino project, simply was picked up and moved to another, non-historic, location and made part of a tourist stop.

Multiple tall casinos, up to about 35 stories, now tower above the valley in Black Hawk that used to be flooded in the spring, in an "ick" procedure, when, according to local personalities, wealthy Central City residents would release water to flush the sewage that had accumulated on the streets and ditches over the winter, downhill to Black Hawk.

Central City patrons were the elites of their time, patronizing their own opera house, at times used as a stage by some of the elite performers including Joseph Jefferson, Edwin Booth, Fanie Barlow, Buffalo Bill, P.T. Barnum's circus, later Samuel Ramey and Beverly Sills.

Central City, in another controversial move, spent millions annexing land and building an 8-mile-long "main street" to access an exit from Interstate 70 that would have gamblers direct access to their town.

The towns are in Gilpin County, which has its own history of scandalous and offensive behavior including racism. Even after the casinos started appearing, the county paid $700,000 to settle a lawsuit by a black county resident who, stunningly, was identified in official sheriff's department documents as "N***** Roy."

Now it is G3 Gaming, of Raleigh, N.C., that is proposing the Gregory Gulch Gaming Resort project, which would be 100,000 square feet, 1,000 slot machines, 50 gaming tables, gift shops, restaurants, 600 hotel rooms, 2,000 parking spaces and 120 housing units for workers in the very valley that connects Central City's heights to Black Hawk, downhill.

The 27-story project, however, would tick off locals, for sure.

A description of the agenda in the Denver Post noted the building would cut off Central City homes from any sunlight for months out of the year.

The report described how resident Bob Powe sits on his front porch, with coffee, to watch as the sun reaches his house of Casey Street.

"The warmth from the sky, Powe said, is vital in this Gilpin County town that's perched at 8,500 feet, and where during the fall and winter the sun sits low on the horizon and shades Central City for part of the day," the report described.

Even those few hours now are endangered, he said.

"This house depends on the sun to heat it up," the 74-year-old said. "After 160 years, they're trying to take away my sunshine."

Climate change activists appear not to have gotten involved in the dispute, yet.

City officials whose decision on the project is not yet final suggest it gives Central City an opportunity to compete against Black Hawk, where two tall casino hotels already are located.

The issue is money, Central City's boom at the opening of gambling has dwindled while downhill Black Hawk's hasn't. Central City got about $1 million in state gaming tax revenue in fiscal 2025, while Black Hawk got $12.2 million.

Said one Central City official, "My concern is, at this point in time, Central City is dying."

Powe said that the new tower would simply destroy the view from many Central City points.

"He has posted 'No Tower' and 'Not Black Hawk' signs around his home," the Post said.

Even worse, "You'll be able to look right into the hotel windows and they'll be able to look right at me. This will destroy my privacy, the view and the sunshine," he said.

Central City's present height limit for buildings is 53 feet. G3 wants its project to soar 345 feet.

City officials estimate they could collect $8 million a year from G3's work.

Central City was founded in 1859 when gold dust as found, exploding quickly to 15,000 residents. Theaters, hotels and Central City still recognizes its historic prostitution industry with annual Lou Bunch "bed races" on its main street.

Peter Droege, chief of a foundation that works to preserve and restore the historic Belvidere Theater, suggested a project the size of an airport at the town's entrance may be too much.

"I support economic development as long as it conforms to the historic nature of the town," he told the Post.

The title to his home traces back some 150 years to the man who originally discovered gold there.

"Central City just has a historic quality that not many other communities in the country have — where you drive into it and it feels like you are stepping back in time," he said in the report.

Central City's district, where about 300 now live, actually produced some 6.3 million ounces of gold, 200 tons, that would be worth around $18 trillion on today's market. Bob Dylan once performed in the town, failing to launch his later successful career, and Stetson hats were invented there.

Multiple movies and television shows have been created there.

© 2025 - Patriot News Alerts