This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A lot of violence-promoting hate language has erupted across America since the politically motivated assassination of Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk in Utah a week ago.
One of the more egregious comments has come out of Oberlin's student body.
That school, which has a documented history of attacking innocent people, and paying the damages, now has disavowed the comments from student Julia Xu, who insisted, "We need to bring back political assassinations."
A report at the Gateway Pundit described Xu as "a radical leftist student" who is on the college's board for "Gender, Sexuality, and Attraction Initiatives" and supports "Students for a Free Palestine."
She was posting on social media under the slogan "bringbacktheguillotine."
The New York Post noted how she admitted her "learnings" were influenced by China's dictator.
Xu later told the Post she was "deeply remorseful" for her agenda of violence.
School officials said Xu's comments don't reflect the opinions of the class or the school, but there was no evidence she would be facing any punishment.
The school's record of attacking innocent bystanders includes the case of the Gibson family-owned bakery near the campus.
The school and its faculty made false accusations of racism against the bakery and its owners, and lost in court, ending up paying more than $36 million in defamation damages.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
In an interview Wednesday, former President Barack Obama discussed the assassination of Charlie Kirk, pointing to the rhetoric of President Donald Trump and some of his administration for contributing to and normalizing political vitriol in America.
Speaking at the Jefferson Educational Society in Erie, Pennsylvania, Obama said Trump and his allies calling their opponents "vermin" and "enemies … speaks to a broader problem."
Obama condemned some in "authority" for trying "to silence discussion" in the nation after Kirk's murder.
"I didn't know Charlie Kirk, Obama said. "I was generally aware of some of his ideas. I think those ideas were wrong – but that doesn't negate that what happened was a tragedy, and I mourn for his family."
In response, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement: "Obama used every opportunity to sow division and pit Americans against each other, and following his presidency more Americans felt Obama divided the country than felt he united it."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Fani Willis, the Fulton County, Georgia, prosecutor who created an organized crime case against President Donald Trump and a long list of other defendants as part of the Democrats' lawfare against him, has suffered the ultimate in rejection.
After a lower court threw her off the case because of conflicts – for one thing she hired her paramour with tax money to assemble her allegations against Trump – the state Supreme Court now has refused to reconsider, making her ejection of the now likely-dead case against Trump permanent.
For the case to continue, another prosecutor would have to be assigned the case, and begin assembling claims about evidence from the start.
According to Law & Crime, it was a "supreme loss" for Willis, a Democrat who played a large part in her party's lawfare against Trump.
It was the Georgia Court of Appeals that ruled earlier, 2-1, that Judge Scott McAfee was mistaken when he allowed Willis and her handpicked special prosecutor Nathan Wade, with whom she had a romantic relationship, an ultimatum that one or the other had to go due to a "significant appearance of impropriety," the report said.
McAfee erred by failing to disqualify Willis and her office, that ruling said.
That was because of her "significant appearance of impropriety."
The high court said, "In the Court of Appeals, the defendants here appealed the trial court's disqualification order, which (1) found that the conduct of the district attorney and special prosecutor created a 'significant appearance of impropriety,' and (2) as a remedy, determined that one of those two prosecutors would have to withdraw from the case. In doing so, the defendants did not contest the appearance-of-impropriety finding, but they contended that the trial court's 'one of you has to go' version of disqualification was error, and that it should have instead simply disqualified the district attorney. And critically, the State did not cross-appeal the trial court's ruling."
The court said that ultimately may have to be reviewed in another case, as right now, "the legal basis for a rule that prosecutors may be subject to disqualification based only on conduct that creates the appearance of impropriety is not clear."
The ruling ends Willis' scheme to remain on the high-profile RICO case and transfers prosecutorial responsibility to a new attorney.
Trump's lawyer, Steve Sadow said, "The Georgia Supreme Court has correctly denied review of the Georgia Court of Appeals decision disqualifying DA Fani Willis and her office as prosecutors in the Fulton County RICO case. Willis's misconduct during the investigation and prosecution of President Trump was egregious and she deserved nothing less than disqualification. This proper decision should bring an end to the wrongful political, lawfare persecutions of the President."
Even now, investigations continue into whether, and how much, Willis schemed with special counsel Jack Smith, who was handling other Democrat lawfare cases against Trump, and ex-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's partisan January 6 commission, which actually assembled select pieces of evidence to claim Trump was responsible for those events.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Only a day after WorldNetDaily reported more than one perpetrator may have been involved in the assassination scheme that killed Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk while he was speaking at a free speech event at a Utah school, there's confirmation now that other individuals now are the targets of FBI agents.
The civil rights leader and outspoken Christian leader was gunned down at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, and a suspect, Tyler Robinson, described as a being far left on the political spectrum and a supporter of the LGBT ideology, in fact sharing an apartment with a man transitioning to be a "woman," had been arrested.
But FBI chief Kash Patel explained during an interview Monday that the suspect allegedly was involved in social media chat groups in which the plan to murder Kirk apparently was a topic of discussion.
There are other members of Discord chat rooms, and "scores are going to be spoken to," Patel said.
He said the FBI already had obtained message exchanges between the suspect and his live-in partner, and data from cell phone use and more was being used to identified where the suspect had various conversations, and with whom he was speaking.
He said the FBI is moving carefully through the process so what is found can be used as evidence in court.
Text messages, in fact, talked about the "opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and he was going to do it."
The public, Patel said, has a right to know who knew of the assassin's plans, and what they did with that knowledge:
Assistant FBI chief Dan Bongino, also during an interview, said a focal point is what happened when an "individual expresses in advance his desire or her desire to do these specific things … The target was announced in advance. … Did they say and hear it and think it was some kind of joke? There's a larger network here."
In fact, a report at the Free Beacon indicated the FBI is investigating social media posts "by at least seven different accounts that appeared to indicate foreknowledge of the assassination of Charlie Kirk."
That's according to those familiar with the investigation and screenshots the publication obtained.
"The posts—one of which referenced the date of Kirk's assassination, September 10, more than a month before it took place—were all deleted in the days following the killing. Several of the accounts appear to belong to transgender individuals, and at least one of them followed suspect Tyler Robinson's roommate, with whom Robinson was allegedly in a relationship, on TikTok," the Free Beacon explained.
"The FBI has received archived copies of the posts, according to a person who flagged them for the agency. Screenshots of the posts have been circulating online but had not been previously authenticated. While the posts do not establish that any of the individuals knew or conspired with Robinson, the 22-year-old gunman who allegedly shot Kirk, several of them mention the conservative activist by name and fantasize about his death."
One social media statement, on Sept. 3, said, "itd be funny if someone like charlie kirk got shot on september 10th LMAO."
And one from Aug. 6 said, "september 10th will be a very interesting day." After Kirk's assassination, that same speaker said, "I plead the fifth."
One person "who appears to follow Robinson's roommate, Lance Twiggs, on TikTok, … posted as soon as Kirk was killed, "WE F—— DID IT."
The report said, "Several of the accounts under investigation appear to be associated with LGBT subcultures. One individual, 'Osamu bin Tezuka,' used the X handle '@fujoshincel,' a reference to a genre of anime that depicts romantic relationships between men. Another user, '@NajraGalvz,' who had wished death to Kirk and predicted that 'something big will happen' when he set foot on campus, had identified as nonbinary on X."
The LGBT factor should provide alarms for Americans, as multiple recent mass shootings, before the Kirk assassination, involved those caught in the transgender culture.
The Free Beacon noted, "a video posted on TikTok the night before the shooting, an individual who appears to be transgender wrote that 'charles james kirk…does not know what's coming tomorrow.'"
The Free Beacon pointed out, "the posts do not establish that any of the individuals knew or conspired with Robinson, the 22-year-old gunman who allegedly shot Kirk, several of them mention the conservative activist by name and fantasize about his death."
Alarmingly, one mentions "Donald Trump. December 14th," in the same discussion.
WND's earlier report noted that journalist Benny Johnson posted on X: "Just spoke with top FBI official who made it very clear that they have NOT ruled out co-conspirators in Charlie Kirk's assassination: 'That assumption is premature. This investigation is just beginning. An enormous amount of evidence has been seized both digital and physical.'"
"FBI sources assure me the public will 'know everything' about the dark internet history, chats and affiliations of Kirk's left-wing political assassin," Johnson continued. "The source then alluded to some online groups attempting to delete or destroy evidence."
"We have everything. We are focused on the radicalization element. The truth will not be hidden, or buried or classified. The public will know," according to the source.
Journalist Nick Sortor confirmed the bureau is actively digging through chat logs, dark web history, and affiliations of Tyler Robinson, the suspect in custody, noting: "Another FBI source independently verified to me Benny's reporting here is accurate."
"NO STONE should be left unturned. We must know exactly WHO radicalized this degenerate, and lock their asses up."
Elon Musk earlier had blasted left-wing violence and the assassination of Kirk, saying "The left is the party of murder and celebrating murder."
"See how much violence there is on the left, with our friend Charlie Kirk getting murdered in cold blood this week and people on the left celebrating it openly. The left is the party of murder and celebrating murder. Let that sink in for a minute. That's who we're dealing with here."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
During The 2024 presidential race, the Democrats were in lockstep: Joe Biden was an amazing intellect capable of running the world's most powerful country like no other. And Kamala Harris was right with him regarding work, duties, goals and accomplishments.
That was before the election.
Now it's after, a catastrophic landslide loss, and according to Harris, Biden's team didn't support her and didn't even understand that her doing well reflected on him.
According to the Biden entourage, Harris never was good at her job.
A commentary at Twitchy said, "It appears the Biden folks aren't very happy about Kamala's new bombshell book. To be clear, Joe probably has no idea what is going on or what is being said or even what planet he is on. Jill and the rest her team are mad.
"Basically, they are saying all she did was complain, did no work, and was incompetent. Sounds about right."
The internal war is being documented on social media:
For example, Harris charges that, "None of them grasped that if I did well, he did well. That given the concerns about his age, my visible success as his vice president was vital. It would serve as a testament to his judgment in choosing me and reassurance that if something happened, the country was in good hands. My success was important for him. His team didn't get it."
She further blasted the Biden White House for failing to push back when she was criticized.
"The White House rarely pushed back with my actual resume: two terms elected D.A., top cop in the second-largest department of justice in the United States, senator representing one in eight Americans.
She also claimed she had to "shoulder" the burden for the porous border, even though the issue had been "intractable for Democrats, and Republican administrations alike."
She was, after all, appointed by Biden to be the border czar.
But President Donald Trump, on taking office and eliminating Biden's pro-illegal alien agenda, reduce the illegal trafficking across the southern board to almost zero within just weeks.
The backlash wasn't hard to predict:
Said one report, "Bidenworld explodes at Harris over the book excerpt after years of simmering tensions. 'Vice President Harris was simply not good at the job,' said one former Biden White House official. 'She had basically zero substantive role in any of the administration's key work streams, and instead would just dive bomb in for stilted photo ops that exposed how out of depth she was.' Biden is 'not the reason she struggled in office or tanked her 2019 [presidential] campaign,' the ex-official said. 'Or lost the 2024 campaign, for that matter. The independent variable there is the vice president, not Biden or his aides.'"
Harris, in fact, dropped out of the 2020 Democrat race without gaining a single delegate. She got no more in being crowned the Democrat candidate in 2024 because she was hand-picked by the party elites and party members never voted on her.
Twitchy's opinion, "Basically, they are saying all she did was complain, did not work, and was incompetent. Sounds about right."
Others blamed Harris' own team while VP: She was known as someone who was extremely hard to work for, and her staff proved that with high turnover rates.
The commentary concluded: "So, he had dementia and she was incompetent. Sounds about right."
A report at the Daily Mail documented how Biden insiders were spewing "venom" at Harris.
"The gloves are off in Biden world after former Vice President Kamala Harris released an excerpt from her new memoir, calling it 'recklessness' to let the octogenarian decide for himself whether to run for re-election," the report said.
"This wasn't a choice that should have been left to an individual's ego, an individual's ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision," she said.
The report quoted a Biden "insider," saying it was a "sloppy, sort of craven, relatively unsophisticated attempt at deflecting blame."
Another accused her of "whining" about her failed presidential campaign.
Harris also complained that when Biden did drop out, after a disastrously failed debate with President Donald Trump, he didn't mention her until almost nine minutes into the 11-minute speech.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
President Donald Trump on Monday highlighted another deadly weekend in Chicago, as he wondered "what is wrong" with Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Mayor Brandon Johnson who are opposing any deployment of National Guard troops to stem the violence in the Windy City.
"6 people were murdered in Chicago this weekend, 12 others were shot, and in serious condition," Trump said on Truth Social.
"This would mean that over the past number of weeks, approximately 50 people were killed, and hundreds were shot, many expected to die.
"Governor Pritzker just stated that he doesn't want Federal Government HELP! WHY??? What is wrong with this guy, and the 5% in Polls Mayor. I want to help the people of Chicago, not hurt them. Only the Criminals will be hurt!
"We can move fast and stop this madness. The City and State have not been able to do the job. People of Illinois should band together and DEMAND PROTECTION. IT IS ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE!!! ACT NOW, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter."
He posted another message touting the reduction of crime in the nation's capital since the Guard was deployed there to assist local law enforcement.
"Washington, D.C. IS A SAFE ZONE IN JUST A MATTER OF WEEKS," Trump said. "Thank you, President Trump. Who's Next???"
The president also shared an image revealing crime statistics in D.C., noting carjackings have dropped by 85%, robberies by 42% and violent crime by 24% since Trump began his crime crackdown.
On Saturday, he posted an "Apocalypse Now"-style message, saying: "I love the smell of deportations in the morning …
"Chicago about to find out why it's called the Department of WAR." Democrats have been reportedly losing their minds after that post.
One reaction to Trump's posts was an image of both Pritzker and Johnson starring in a spoof of "Dumb and Dumber," with the message: "They are having blood on their hands for allowing this crime to continue!"
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
For decades, many society influencers have touted the idea that the path to happiness for women is to be a career-minded professional with corporate titles and accolades, a platinum card and an absence of preschool, play-date and baby-sitting responsibilities.
That might work for some, but a new survey shows that more married women with children report being "very happy" than those unmarried without.
The survey by the Institute for Family Studies has found that 19% of married women with children report being very happy. That beats all other categories, including married without children at 11%, unmarried with children at 13% and unmarried without children at 10%.
The survey reported, "Married women are also more likely than unmarried women to say that life was enjoyable most or all of the time: 47% of married mothers and 43% of married childless women say life is enjoyable, compared to 40% of unmarried mothers and 34% of unmarried childless women."
The survey was done by Jean M. Twenge, Jenet Erickson, Wendy Wang, and Brad Wilcox, and Twenge wrote of her own decisions about marriage and children.
Then she explained, "These findings are not a one-off. Well-respected sources, such as the General Social Survey, show the same result; married mothers and fathers in that survey were more likely to report being 'very happy' than unmarried people and those without children. Another recent study found that married or partnered mothers are less likely to frequently feel depressed or anxious than people in the other three groups.
"Could it be not that marriage produces happiness, but that the causation goes the other way—that happier people are more likely to marry? One study controlled for premarital happiness levels and still found that marriage results in happier people and a less intense dip in life satisfaction at middle age.
"That's not to say the roles of wife and mother don't have their challenges. Roughly two-thirds of mothers in our survey, for example, said that they felt overwhelmed each day (though so did more than half of nonmothers). About six in 10 mothers said that they wished they had more time to themselves, compared with about four out of 10 childless women."
She noted, "Why, then, are mothers happier? The reasons speak to the profound experience of parenthood. Married mothers were the most likely to agree that their life 'has a clear sense of purpose' (28 percent), followed closely by unmarried mothers (25 percent). Only approximately 15 percent of women without children agreed. Mothers were also more likely than nonmothers to agree that their life 'feels meaningful' all or most of the time.
"I now have three children, and I am somewhat incredulous that in my premotherhood inquiries, no one mentioned the sense of purpose parenthood gives you. Yes, you're going to be tired and overwhelmed, but there's a deep knowledge that you're doing something important with your life: You're nurturing a human being. These feelings of purpose and meaning are sometimes difficult to put into words—perhaps why they aren't regularly discussed—but they are central to being a parent. I am fortunate to have a career I love and find meaningful; even so, the sense of purpose I have found through motherhood dwarfs every career milestone I have ever achieved."
She said, "The survey results also showed that marriage comes with several advantages. Married women are about half as likely to report being lonely as unmarried women. One factor may be that married women are more likely, they report, to regularly receive physical affection and touch. Touch is, in turn, strongly linked to happiness: 22 percent of women in the survey who experienced a high level of physical touch were very happy, compared with only 7 percent of those who received a low level of touch. Touch, especially from a spouse, is associated with reduced stress, increased trust, and greater feelings of safety.
"The false narrative that marriage and motherhood are a recipe for women's unhappiness is doing a lot of damage. In a nationally representative survey that I analyzed for my book Generations, the number of 18-year-old women who expected to have children plummeted by 11 percentage points from the late 2000s to the early 2020s. Negative messaging about marriage and motherhood is likely at the root of these Gen Z shifts, along with a pervasive pessimism about everything, egged on by social media, that borders on doomerism. Young people are also profoundly lonely and spend less time with their peers in person; the consequences for their adult relationships are unknown. Recent trends are even more concerning: AI girlfriends and boyfriends now offer the prospect of 'relationships' with an always-available entity that has no needs of its own. Meanwhile, the fertility rate in the U.S. is at an all-time low."
The survey reported, "Popular press articles often declare that single women without children are happier than married mothers, with headlines such as: 'Women are happier without children or a spouse, says happiness expert,' or '4 reasons why single women are the happiest people on Earth—by a psychologist,' and 'Why so many single women without children are happy.'"
It states, "Being married is the most important differentiator of happiness in America, with married people 30 percentage points happier than unmarried people. However, little of this research has focused specifically on women, and it is unclear how marriage and motherhood are linked to one another and to women's happiness."
The study was conducted by YouGov from March 1-12, 2025, with a representative sample of 3,000 women, ages 25-55, in the U.S.
The results also reported women, married with children, generally are less lonely. Only 11% reported being lonely most or all of the time in the last past 30s. For married without children, it was 10%, for unmarried with children 23% and for unmarried without children 20%.
Women married with children also reported more physical touch, which leads to being happier.
"Thus, one factor that explains why married women are happier than their unmarried peers is that they have more regular opportunities for kissing, hugging, and snuggling. For example, 58% of married women with children and 61% of married women without children report that they often get hugs or kisses, while only 36% of unmarried mothers and 18% of unmarried women without children report the same," the survey said.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Members of the federal judiciary, in a number of instances since President Donald Trump took office for his second term, have adopted political positions in their rulings.
Judges at the federal court system's entry level, district courts, have claimed the authority to order the nation's international affairs, financial affairs, DEI ideologies, expenditures, and more, many of which fall directly inside the president's responsibilities under the Constitution.
And now they are complaining the Supreme Court "doesn't have our backs."
Anonymously, of course, as one judge, James Boasberg, in Washington, who publicly complained about Trump at a judicial conference now is the subject of an ethics complaint.
It seems judges are supposed to be neutral about issues and individuals in cases before their court, and Boasberg tried to "undermine" the president, who is involved in several cases Boasberg is hearing.
A report at Fox News explained, "A group of anonymous federal judges is criticizing the Supreme Court for overturning lower court rulings and siding with President Donald Trump's administration with little to no explanation."
The report cited NBC interviews with "12 federal judges, appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents including Trump."
They complained to NBC about "a trend of lower court decisions being overturned by emergency rulings from the high court."
Trump administration officials also have been publicly critical of the decisions made by judges who have gone out of their lane, the report said.
Ten of the judges told the Supreme Court the justices should provide more explanation when the district court decisions are reversed.
"They don't have our backs," said one anonymous complainer.
One judge also reported getting death threats for his rulings in opposition to the president's agenda.
And the administration has been critical of those lower court decisions, describing one fight as the result of a "judicial coup."
NBC said one judge who described the Supreme Court's actions as inexcusable claimed, "Somebody is going to die" because of administration criticism.
"It's almost like the Supreme Court is saying it is a 'judicial coup,'" one judge told NBC.
There was one dissenter, a judge appointed by Barack Obama, who admitted multiple judges have been "out of line" with their political agendas in opposition to the president.
"The whole 'Trump derangement syndrome' is a real issue. As a result, judges are mad at what Trump is doing or the manner he is going about things; they are sometimes forgetting to stay in their lane," that judge said.
One example of the judicial activism at the entry-court level is Boasberg himself.
WND reported recently when Boasberg, who has been virulently anti-Trump for years, ever since he was involved in the scheme to spy on the Trump campaign as part of the Russiagate conspiracy theory from 2016, heard a case of a woman jailed for her deranged social media posts about wanting to kill Trump.
Boasberg decided she shouldn't be in jail, so he ordered her released, with electronic monitoring and a visit to a psychiatrist.
Lately, Boasberg has run an agenda opposing Trump's efforts to secure America's borders and remove illegal alien criminals from U.S. shores, wildly insisting that two jets loaded with those individuals that already were on deportation flights in international airspace to turn around and return the criminals to America, without acknowledging whether the jets even had enough fuel to do that.
The Gateway Pundit explained, "Now this woman has been quietly released by Obama-appointed Judge James Boasberg. That would be the same Judge Boasberg who has repeatedly interfered in efforts to deport illegal alien criminals."
Boasberg also has been criticized for publicly suggesting, during a judicial conference, that Trump would not follow his orders and that would create a constitutional crisis.
Attorney General Pam Bondi explained she ordered a complaint filed over the "misconduct" by Boasberg, for "making improper public comments about President Trump and his administration."
"These comments have undermined the integrity of the judiciary," she confirmed.
A DOJ official confirmed, "Judge Boasberg first tried to persuade Chief Justice Roberts and other federal judges that the Trump administration would not follow court orders, despite having no basis for his belief. Then he acted on his baseless belief again and again in litigation over which he was presiding. Judge Boasberg violated the Canons of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, including the requirement that he 'promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.'"
WorldNetDaily has reported it was the Federalist that obtained access to comments Boasberg made at a recent judicial conference undermining the president.
He disparaged the president, even though he's required to be neutral on issues and people in his court, where Trump is a defendant in a number of cases brought by activists trying to undermine his agenda for America.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche later described Boasberg as a "threat to the rule of law" for using his own agendas in his court rulings to try to control the decisions of the Executive Branch.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A tow-truck driver apparently thought it would be "funny" to tow away a vehicle being used by federal ICE agents making arrests in Los Angeles.
It's proven about has humorous as a decade in prison.
It was Acting U.S Attorney Bill Essayli who posted about the beginning of the case against Bobby Nunez:
"How it started vs. How it's going ARRESTED: Bobby Nunez is now under arrest for brazenly towing an ICE vehicle. He is charged with theft of government property. Apparently he thought it would be funny to interfere with our immigration enforcement operations. Now he can laugh behind bars while he faces justice. Nunez is looking at up to 10 years in federal prison if convicted."
Reporter Nick Sorter explained the second chapter in the story: "BREAKING: The man who went viral for TOWING AWAY an ICE vehicle while they were making an arrest in Los Angeles has now been ARRESTED himself FAFO, loser. Bobby Nunez, who was PlSSED about his perp walk being filmed, now faces TEN YEARS in prison Nunez was tracked down by DHS via TlkTok."
At the Post Millennial was a report that explained ICE agents were detaining an illegal immigrant for DUI when Nunez went into action.
"Per Fox News' Bill Melugin, the criminal complaint signed off on by a federal judge stated that Nunez was laughing and recording ICE agents on his phone while he towed the vehicle away," the report explained.
The incident happened during the arrest of Leidy Tatiana Mafla-Martinez, a Colombian TikToker who was in the U.S. illegally, just weeks ago.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
An Illinois man has been arrested and accused of intentional homicide of an unborn child after he allegedly gave the abortion chemical mifepristone to his girlfriend, killing her baby, according to a report from Live Action News.
The report said it was police in Bloomington who took into custody Emerson Evans, on allegations he drugged his girlfriend without her knowledge.
"Evans had reportedly been pressuring the woman to abort the baby," the report explained, adding, "He told police he paid a different woman $50 for the pills."
Evans, 31, of Normal, Illinois, now faces counts of intentional homicide of an unborn child.
Bloomington police said in a statement emergency personnel were called to a home on August 22 for a pregnant woman having a medical emergency.
"They found the woman crying in a bathroom, surrounded by a large amount of blood. They then found the remains of her preborn baby in the toilet," the report confirmed.
Evans subsequently confirmed he wanted her to get an abortion and then said he decided to "make the decision for her" by administering the abortion drug to her without her knowledge or consent, the report said.
"We are again saddened by the alleged criminal actions which resulted in harm to others. It is my hope the mother involved in the matter fully recovers and has the resources and support of this strong community in the future," said Chief Jamal Simington.
The report noted the potential penalty for intentional homicide of an unborn child is 20-60 years in prison, and in some cases, life in prison.