This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

President Donald Trump has launched a new website called "Criminals" to expose the names, images and other information about "criminal aliens receiving taxpayer-funded Medicaid."

It's part of his efforts to secure American borders, expel criminal illegal aliens and build the American economy for the benefit of Americans and their businesses.

The website is here.

It's a project of the Trump White House which explained, "The Trump administration has intensified enforcement against criminal illegal aliens receiving taxpayer-funded Medicaid benefits, arresting hundreds of unauthorized individuals since taking office, including those with serious criminal records who exploited taxpayer-funded Medicaid illegally or through loopholes. This crackdown, driven by executive orders prioritizing public safety and fiscal responsibility, has led to the swift deportation of many individuals convicted of heinous acts, ensuring that precious resources meant for American citizens are no longer diverted to subsidize violent criminals.

"Compounding the crisis, Democrats have refused to pass a clean budget bill to end the shutdown unless Republicans concede to their demands for $1.5 trillion in new spending, including restorations to Medicaid expansions that would effectively extend coverage to over 1 million illegal aliens, funneling an additional $200 billion to such programs over the next decade at the expense of U.S. families."

On the page are highlighted "some of those criminals convicted of heinous crimes like murder, rape, burglary and assault."

What follows is a long page of images identifying suspects such as "illegal alien from Dominican Republic."

That particular suspect was involved in assault, harassment and robbery.

The Gateway Pundit explained how the website now has gone live and publishes "names, mugshots, and criminal charges of illegal immigrants receiving benefits from the federal health program."

"Some of those criminals were convicted of heinous offenses, including murder, rape, burglary, and assault," the report said.

While Democrats have claimed no illegals get Medicaid benefits, the evidence shows otherwise.

Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins confirmed, "We have found, after studying about $100 billion in spending, thousands and thousands of illegal uses of the EBT card. We have been moving people off of SNAP. We've got almost 700,000 people, I think, that we've moved off just since the President took office."

She continued, "We've arrested about 118 people. So this has been ongoing."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Florida police have released borderline graphic video of when a sheriff's deputy was forced to take down a thug who had a knife and was threatening the life of a 7-year-old child.

The footage is from bodycam documentation of the confrontation between Antonio Gonzalez, of the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, and the late Mario Comacho, 27, who died in the episode.

The video of the deputy confronting the suspect, who was reported to have a knife at the child's throat and was choking him, in a back room of a house in Brandon, Florida:

The sheriff's office later issued a statement about the incident.

Authorities said the confrontation happened on Sunday when deputies got a call about a domestic violence situation.

The caller said Camacho was armed with a knife and threatening the little boy.

"Once on scene, the suspect barricaded himself with his brother in a back bedroom. Deputies heard the child screaming for help and kicked down the door. Deputies encountered the suspect, who was holding a knife and refusing to let go of the child. The suspect was wearing a motorcycle helmet and two tactical vests with ballistic plates. After several commands to drop the knife, our deputy shot the suspect, rescuing the brother," authorities reported.

Camacho was pronounced dead at Brandon Regional Hospital.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Zohran Mamdani, making headlines as he leads candidates to be New York City's next mayor, daily is embroiled in controversy.

For issues such as his communist ideologies. He claims they're "democratic socialist," but he insists on supporting the "seizure of the means of production," the abolition of private property and centralization of the means of communication and transport in "the hands of the state."

And his own mother's description of him as "not an American at all."

And taking money from foreign supporters, which is illegal, and has now generated two criminal referrals against him.

report at the Independent Sentinel said the Coolidge Reagan Foundation, a campaign finance watchdog, filed the referrals claiming Mamdani got illegal cash from foreigners.

The report said the campaign claimed those issues were resolved.

But still there remain questions about some $13,000 he got from 170 donors "from outside the U.S.," the report said.

"These are not isolated incidents or clerical errors," charged Dan Backer, of the foundation.

He told Fox News Digital, "This was a sustained pattern of foreign money flowing into a New York City mayoral race which is a clear violation of both federal law and New York City campaign finance rules. Mamdani's campaign was on notice for months that it was accepting illegal foreign contributions, and yet it did nothing meaningful to stop it."

Mamdani's campaign claimed 31 donors have "proven" their citizenship while the other 139 have had donations refunded.

The accusations charge that the campaign may have violated the Federal Election Campaign Act, under which foreigners are not allowed to support with their cash U.S. election candidates.

Backer said, "The law is crystal clear that foreign nationals may not participate in American elections, and that includes making contributions. Yet Mamdani's campaign repeatedly accepted donations from individuals abroad."

Fox News report said the donations totaling about $13,000 from outsiders had been confirmed through a review of finance reports just days ago.

CRF sent the criminal referrals to Assistant Attorney General Matthew R. Galeotti of the U.S. Department of Justice's Criminal Division and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg this week.

The referral seeks an investigation into possible violations of federal law.

When the campaign insisted it was returning illegal donations, the foundation charged that "returning questionable donations doesn't cure the violation."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

When the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, accused President Donald Trump of felonies in a so-called hush money case, the judge, Juan Merchan, censored Trump's statements about the case. He allowed prosecutors to leave a vague "secondary" crime claim in place without any specifics. He delivered pro-prosecution jury instructions which seemed to allow a verdict without unanimity.

And all the while, Merchan's daughter was making money advising Democrats on issues that could include her father's courtroom rulings.

Now the president is appealing, with his lawyers explaining the Supreme Court's immunity ruling means prosecutors should not have been allowed to say some of the things they claimed about Trump.

The Washington Examiner reports Trump's legal team confirmed the Supreme Court's decision on immunity "means prosecutors should have been barred from using evidence connected to Trump's 'official' acts as president in the case against him."

"Trump also urged a federal appeals court to transfer the New York state criminal case to federal court. It's similar to the president's move over the summer, when his lawyers urged a federal appeals panel to move the hush money case. Such a change could open up the pathway for the Supreme Court to hear the case, which could be friendlier territory for the president, as the court has ruled largely in his favor on presidential immunity," the report explained.

It was in 2024 that a jury in leftist-majority Manhattan said he was guilty of falsifying records dealing with a payment to onetime porn star Stormy Daniels, 34 counts total.

The errors made in the trial court, however, mean the conviction should be scrapped, the report said.

Merchan, a donor to a Democrat cause, in fact, barred some of Trump's defense evidence, including statements that appeared to exonerate him from Daniels herself, censored Trump's speech, delivered pro-prosecution instructions, and more.

"One of the mistakes some legal critics believe was committed during the trial involved allegations that the New York district attorney's office, led by Alvin Bragg, never committed itself to what the second crime was. Rather, his office theorized that the crime could have been a New York tax violation, a federal campaign finance violation, or a New York election law violation," the report explained.

The law violation brought by Bragg is a two-part crime, meaning it depends on violation of another statute, and the prosecution never clarified that. That means some members of the jury may have assumed one law, or another, leaving their verdict not unanimous.

"The court permitted the jury to convict if some jurors believed only that President Trump had conspired to violate FECA, while others believed only that he had conspired to help others commit tax fraud, and still others believed only that he had conspired to help others make false statements to a bank," appeals court filings said. "Due process and Section 17-152 do not permit a conviction based on such a haphazard 'combination of jury findings.'"

At sentencing, Merchan spent seven minutes complaining that he was limited in his sentencing, then gave Trump an unconditional discharge, allowing for no fines, jail or probation while continuing the felony convictions.

Merchan, whose daughter is a consultant who was making money off of her father's multiple rulings against Trump, claimed "extraordinary" legal protections handed to the president of the United States required him to hand down a minor sentence that Trump would allegedly not have received without being reelected.

"While one can argue that the trial itself was in many respects somewhat ordinary, the same cannot be said about the circumstances surrounding this sentencing and that is because of the office [Trump] once occupied, and which you will soon occupy again," Merchan told the president-elect. "To be sure, it is the legal protections afforded to the office of the president of the United States that are extraordinary, not the occupant of the office. The legal protections, especially within the context of a criminal prosecution, afforded to the office of the president have been laid out by our founders, the Constitution and most recently interpreted by the United States Supreme Court in the matter of Trump versus the United States, which was decided on July 1, 2024.

"As with every other defendant in your position, it is my obligation to consider any and all aggravating and mitigating factors to inform my decision … The considerable, indeed, extraordinary legal protections afforded by the office of the chief executive, is a factor that overrides all others," the judge continued.

Merchan, in extraordinary fashion, allowed a wide range of inflammatory testimony to come into his courtroom against Trump. The substance of the complaint was that Bragg claimed a $130,000 non-disclosure agreement with former porn actress Stormy Daniels, paid through Trump's then-lawyer as legal fees, were not legal fees. Bragg claimed that calling legal fees legal fees was "falsifying business records."

A long list of legal experts charged that the case never should have been created by Bragg. Merchan, in fact, inexplicably told the jurors their verdict didn't have to be unanimous.

The payment was for Daniels' silence about an alleged affair, which Trump has confirmed never happened. Trump said the payments were part of a standard legal retainer and denied knowing of any unlawful scheme.

The "offenses" actually were misdemeanors until Bragg theorized they were part of the furtherance of another, unidentified, crime, and that made them felonies. Experts called Bragg's machinations "legally creative."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Pressure on the Democrat party to accept the Republicans' clean funding bill for the federal government and end the Schumer Shutdown exploded on Monday when the largest union representing federal workers told the party to give up and reopen operations.

It is the American Federal of Government Employees, representing more than 800,000 federal workers the biggest union in the fight, that said it's time to end.

It's called the Schumer Shutdown because of Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, who has demanded an extra $1.5 trillion in spending on his pet projects in order for him to let his party support the clean continuing of funding that the Republicans had proposed weeks ago.

President Donald Trump has been able to mitigate some of the shutdown damage, like wages for military members that would have been lost, by redesignating various funds to be used for specific purposes, such as income from tariffs to be used for paychecks.

Democrats have been demanding taxpayer money for leftist propaganda, for Obamacare subsidy extensions, for health care for illegal aliens, and such.

The Washington Examiner said the union called for the shutdown to end "today."

That statement sided with Republicans "in their demand that lawmakers pass a 'clean,' short-term funding bill," the report explained.

AFGE chief Everett Kelley said both parties have made a point, but it's time to end the "avoidable crisis."

"The solution he endorsed, a funding measure without any controversial policy amendments, represents a setback for Democrats, who have demanded healthcare concessions as part of any vote," the report said.

Kelley's statement included, "This week, Congress pushed our nation into the fourth week of a full government shutdown – an avoidable crisis that is harming families, communities, and the very institutions that hold our country together. Both political parties have made their point, and still there is no clear end in sight."

He said Congress should focus on solving problems for Americans, "rather than on who is going to get the blame for a shutdown that Americans dislike. Because when the folks who serve this country are standing in line for food banks after missing a second paycheck because of this shutdown, they aren't looking for partisan spin. They're looking for the wages they earned. The fact that they're being cheated out of it is a national disgrace."

While federal workers mostly, in the past, have gotten back pay for government shutdowns, that likely will not happen for all affected workers this time, as Trump has used the open door of a closed government to confirm that there are layoffs being made.

House Speaker Mike Johnson said he hopes the union's demand for a continuing resolution will prompt a "turning point" for Schumer.

Besides paychecks the military and others, a deadline soon will hit in that the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is scheduled to run out of money next weekend.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

There are many commonly used excuses that are, in fact, useless. The dog ate my homework. I didn't see the speed limit sign. I didn't know that was income, and more.

Now, in the age of artificial intelligence there are new ones appearing, including, Google told me wrong.

That's the problem facing duck hunters who was firing shots in Idaho … on a day when that wasn't legal.

report from Cowboy State Daily explained an experienced hunter called counting on AI for accurate information is a "crapshoot."

At best.

Game agents in Idaho had to issue citations to hunters who thought they were following the law, but weren't.

"Idaho Fish and Game spokesman Roger Phillips told Cowboy State Daily some hunters were shooting on the wrong day."

Idaho officials say they want to get on top of the problem right away.

"It's one of those things, when it starts to bubble up, we want to alert people to what's going on," explained Phillips.

Officials in Wyoming, which also has a major industry in hunting, also have concerns.

"Amanda Fry, of Wyoming Game and Fish, explained, "We are seeing inaccuracies in some AI-generated overviews of our regulations. It is an important reminder to reference our website directly for accurate information on our laws and regulations."

She told the publication state officials are happy to provide "accurate" information.

It was Cody's Scott Weber, who has hunted for decades in Wyoming and other states, who told Cowboy State Daily that "he wouldn't trust AI to keep him from getting crossways with the law."

Only the official regulations count, he pointed out.

The report explained, "In the case of the duck hunting regulations, staff discovered that a search engine pulled proposed hunting season dates that were proposed at some point during commission meetings."

Wrong.

Commissioners actually picked other dates.

The report noted another bad situation developed when AI attached fishing regulations from another state to an Idaho river with a similar name.

Game wardens aren't inclined to let excuses stand.

"Here's the thing about that, and game wardens will tell you this, you as a hunter are responsible for knowing all the regulations."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a dispute involving a town's attempts to put Christian speech in a box and keep it there.

The practice of "free speech zones" has become common across the nation, at colleges and universities, in towns and counties and more.

The basis is that authorities determine that they will allow free speech by Christians, often involving members of the faith asking passersby about their relationship with Jesus, but they will allow that only in a specified area.

And that area often is in a remote, isolated and unseen location, behind buildings, on the far side of athletic stadium parking lots and the like.

The fight that the Supreme Court now has agreed to review involves Gabriel Olivier of Mississippi.

In the town of Brandon, officials adopted an ordinance that bans religious speech on public sidewalks near the city's amphitheater.

According to First Liberty Institute, the background is this: "Gabriel Olivier is an evangelical Christian who desires to share his faith with others. Standing outside of well-attended events, Olivier shares the gospel of Jesus Christ, hoping to have peaceful conversations and reach as many people as possible. He was silenced when the City of Brandon, Mississippi, adopted an unconstitutional ordinance that prohibits him from communicating his religious beliefs to others in a city park."

City officials assigned him a "protest" area "that was so far removed from the crowds no one could receive his message." When he moved closer to the traffic areas, he was arrested.

He was fined, then sued the city in federal court and challenged the ordinance.

At the district court level, the judge dismissed the case without considering the facts. That ruling cited a U.S. Supreme Court decision, Heck v. Humphrey, that concerns prisoners and had nothing to do with these free speech circumstances.

When the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals traveled down the same path, an appeal went to the Supreme Court, which now will review.

"Every American has First Amendment rights to free speech; and every American has a right to their day in court," Kelly Shackelford, chief counsel for First Liberty Institute, said. "Both of these rights were violated for Gabe Olivier. The Supreme Court will now decide whether those rights will be protected for all Americans."

Allyson Ho, a partner at Gibson Dunn, which also is involved in the case, added, "We're pleased the Court agreed to take up this important case, and we look forward to presenting our arguments that Mr. Olivier is entitled to his day in court."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Alfred Kinsey, who used sex convicts and pedophiles to make up studies with wild claims that children are sexual from birth, largely is credit with triggering the dive into the massive promotions of deviant and damaging sex ideologies across America.

He was described by officials at Liberty Counsel, who have fought his agenda for years, as "a sexual pervert whose unscientific propaganda exploited women and harmed children."

He inflicted torture on children as they sobbed in pain and then claimed they were enjoying his sex experiments on them.

The results have included rampant pornography in schools, story book hours with drag queens, the claims that abuse of children is normal and more.

It was commentator Linda Harvey who said, "Let's be frank about school sex education. Many classes have become unapologetically pornographic, yet many parents are unaware their kids learn dangerous messages laced with obscenity in the guise of 'health education.'"

Liberty Counsel pointed out at the time 43 states have exemptions from obscenity laws that let sexually explicit materials be used in schools.

"Educational obscenity exemptions are but one example of the toxic legacy of Dr. Alfred Kinsey and his claim that children are sexual from birth and unharmed by sexual activity," explained Mary E. McAlister, senior litigation counsel for Liberty Counsel, who has been researching the exemptions and bringing their toxic history to light.

"That claim, borne out of records of systematic child sexual abuse, was used as a basis for wholesale revision of our criminal laws through the Model Penal Code, of which the educational obscenity exemptions are a part," McAlister said.

But there has been work to respond. Just two years ago, lawmakers in Indiana killed state tax funding for the Indiana University institute launched by Kinsey.

Liberty Counsel chief Mat Staver charged that Kinsey's actions are "indefensible" and Indiana University "should disassociate itself from anything related to Alfred Kinsey."

In fact, Kinsey's "research" resulted from what actually included data from "serial child rapists, sex offenders, prisoners, prostitutes, pedophiles, and pederasts."

The late Dr. Judith Reisman was a visiting professor at Liberty University School of Law and documented the criminal abuse of more than 300 infants and children in the production of Kinsey's research. These children were ages two months to 15 years.

Now, it is time for the next step, a congressional investigation of Kinsey.

That's according to Rhonda Miller, the chief of Purple for Parents United, who explained in a column at the Federalist, "Kinsey's fraudulent research and criminal experiments in the 1940s and '50s ignited the sexual revolution with the lies that sexual perversion is normal and that children are sexual from birth. His reports, 'Sexual Behavior in the Human Male' and 'Sexual Behavior in the Human Female,' laid the groundwork for comprehensive sexuality education and the repeal of legal protections for women and children. Through the United Nations, Kinsey's perversion has spread worldwide, and grassroots leaders from around the world are calling on Congress to step in."

She reported that that the idea of an investigation into what may have involved serious crimes against children arose in 1995, when Rep. Steve Stockman of Texas proposed H.R. 2749 to require an investigation to determine whether Kinsey's research resulted from "fraud or criminal wrongdoing" — and defunded agencies and institutions teaching it as credible if that was the case.

She explained, "If Congress had investigated and eradicated Kinsey's influence in 1995, the world's children would not have been perverted by it. It is time for Congress to do what it should have done 30 years ago: investigate Kinsey's crimes and fraud and defund any agency or institution that promotes them."

She pointed out Kinsey's "science" was used to damage social sciences, culture, laws and education.

"Fifty-two state laws protecting women and children were weakened or repealed as states shifted from the common law to the Model Penal Code, which was based on Kinsey's research. Many states exempted schools, museums, and libraries from laws against distributing pornography to children. Penalties for sexual crimes were lessened, and plea bargains became the norm."

Now the internet ha normalized "abusive and violent sexual behavior and fueling the demand for sex trafficking."

She noted it was her organization that worked with Indiana lawmakers to defund Kinsey's agenda.

"It's time for the federal government to step in," she said.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

In a stunning move that has developed in reaction to the extreme liberal positions being adopted by the Church of England, including a plan to change the Bible to remove homosexuality from its defined sins, the organization has lost 40 million members.

Actually, the few million members in the United Kingdom essentially have been tossed out of the fellowship, the worldwide Anglican church.

"As has been the case from the very beginning, we have not left the Anglican Communion; we are the Anglican Communion," charged a letter from a church chief in Rwanda.

It is the worldwide Anglicans who have announced a separation from the British component of the church.

report at Protestia explained it was a "major blow" that developed as a "punishing reminder that theological treason has consequences."

The "departing" membership is some 10 times the number of Anglicans who remain, in England.

"We cannot continue to have communion with those who advocate the revisionist agenda, which has abandoned the inerrant word of God as the final authority," the worldwide Anglican Communion has announced.

The British portion of the organization for years has adopted changes to the Bible that allow homosexual leadership in the church, approval of wide range of other progressive issues like abortion, and more.

It recently was considering formally blessing same-sex unions and changing the Bible so that homosexuality no longer was a sin, but abruptly backed away.

Explained Protestia, "Over the past two decades, the denomination has been liberalizing at a rapid rate, recently appointing Sarah Mullally, a pro-choice feminist as the new Archbishop of Canterbury and allowing the church to bless same-sex couples, with a major contingent pushing the church to deem homosexuality no longer sinful."

It is the Global Fellowship of Confessing Anglicans, the conservative branch, that already had been pushing back against the denomination's "abandonment of the scriptures and historic Anglican teaching."

The report explained the denomination uses four authorities: "the Archbishop of Canterbury, (someone first among equals) the Lambeth Conference (a meeting of bishops around the world that gathers once a decade), the Primates' Meeting (a meeting of the bishops and archbishops of each of the church's 41 provinces, with the last one held in 2020), and the Anglican Consultative Council, which includes everyone from bishops to deacons to laity and meets every three years."

The conservatives already had replaced the Lambeth Conference with the Jerusalem Conference, and they had issued a "Declaration," affirming Christian beliefs including the marriage as between one man and one woman.

"They further formed their own Primates' Council, held meetings, and recently released a statement that they 'no longer recognize the Archbishop of Canterbury as an Instrument of Communion' or the 'first among equals' of global Primates," the report said.

Now, the report explained, the conservatives have confirmed they are not splitting from the historic Anglican Church, but "rather that they ARE the true Anglican Communion and will be reordering themselves accordingly."

The changes will include a replacement for the Archbishop of Canterbury, as that office now is occupied by Sarah Mullally, "an illegitimate usurper."

The conservative organization said the actions are in response to "the abandonment of the Scriptures" by traditional leaders.

They first sought to persuade those leaders to repent, but they did not.

Their statement:

We resolved to reorder the Anglican Communion as follows:

1. We declare that the Anglican Communion will be reordered, with only one foundation of communion, namely the Holy Bible, "translated, read, preached, taught and obeyed in its plain and canonical sense, respectful of the church's historic and consensual reading" (Jerusalem Declaration, Article II), which reflects Article VI of the 39 Articles of Religion.

2. We reject the so-called Instruments of Communion, namely the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Lambeth Conference, the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC), and the Primates Meeting, which have failed to uphold the doctrine and discipline of the Anglican Communion.

3. We cannot continue to have communion with those who advocate the revisionist agenda, which has abandoned the inerrant word of God as the final authority and overturned Resolution I.10, of the 1998 Lambeth Conference.

4. Therefore, Gafcon has re-ordered the Anglican Communion by restoring its original structure as a fellowship of autonomous provinces bound together by the Formularies of the Reformation, as reflected at the first Lambeth Conference in 1867, and we are now the Global Anglican Communion.

5. Provinces of the Global Anglican Communion shall not participate in meetings called by the Archbishop of Canterbury, including the ACC, and shall not make any monetary contribution to the ACC, nor receive any monetary contribution from the ACC or its networks.

6. Provinces, which have yet to do so, are encouraged to amend their constitution to remove any reference to being in communion with the See of Canterbury and the Church of England.

7. To be a member of the Global Anglican Communion, a province or a diocese must assent to the Jerusalem Declaration of 2008, the contemporary standard for Anglican identity.

8. We shall form a Council of Primates of all member provinces to elect a Chairman, as primus inter pares ('first amongst equals'), to preside over the Council as it continues "to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints" (Jude 3).

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A nurse arrested for driving under the influence has been dismissed from her job after a video of her being taken into custody confirmed she promised the officers she would let them "die."

"I'm a f—— nurse. When you come through my hospital, don't worry, I'll let you die. All your family members, and this is all on recording," the video reveals her to be saying.

According to a report at Law & Crime, the nurse was identified as Crystal Tadlock, who used to work at Memorial Hermann Greater Heights Hospital in Houston.

She was stopped and arrested by police from the Magnolia, Texas, department.

Tadlock allegedly added, "Greater Heights, b—. Don't go there."

The arrest documentation, Law & Crime said, charged that she was pulled over for speeding.

"[Tadlock] stated she was unaware she was traveling 66 mph and mentioned she was returning home from a concert at the Cynthia Woods Pavilion," the report alleges. "She indicated she had dropped off friends who had been drinking and was on her way home."

The officer reported a smell of alcohol coming from the vehicle when he pulled her over, and she allegedly failed field sobriety tests.

"During transport, Crystal became increasingly belligerent, making derogatory remarks and threats. She initially stated that the reason I was doing this was because ICE had not picked me up yet. Crystal also made racist comments about my ethnicity and stated that she is going to be getting out of this because she is white. She also stated that she had an issue with me because I was not white," the arresting officer reported.

The hospital, when officials were given details, released a statement that the employee was suspended pending investigation, and subsequently terminated.

"Once she arrived at jail, staff stated that she had also made the same comment to them that she uttered earlier, saying 'that if any of them went to the hospital where she works, she would ensure they die as well,' according to the arrest report," Law & Order said.

Police officials claimed there is "no excuse" for such actions.

© 2025 - Patriot News Alerts