This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The Bible records the life, teachings, crucifixion, death, and resurrection of Jesus, empowering Him as the Son of God and Savior of mankind.

Now a contemporaneous document written by a Roman historian has been revealed to be confirming a part of those beliefs.

A report in the Daily Mail explains the writings, called the Annals, were written by Roman historian Tacitus, also known as Publius Cornelius Tacitus, who lived from around 56 AD to 120 AD and was widely regarded to have been among the most important Roman historians.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The U.S. Constitution specifically sets up the Supreme Court.

It does not do the same with lower courts: It leaves that up the Congress, a fact that House Speaker Mike Johnson has pointed out to a list of activist judges who have delivered partisan injunctions against President Donald Trump's agenda, injunctions that follow a leftist partisan line and encroach on the authorities of the executive branch.

"We do have authority over the federal courts," he explained. "We can eliminate an entire district court."

A report in the Daily Mail called the comment a "pointed warning to judges nationwide as local courts have slowed the rollout of Donald Trump's political agenda."

Johnson explained, "We do have power over funding over the courts and all these other things. But desperate times call for desperate measures, and Congress is going to act."

The publication called the comment a "veiled reminder, if not threat, that Congress has their eyes on district judges that have issued injunctions and rulings against Trump's policies."

District judges, in fact, have taken over executive branch decision-making regarding DOGE, spending, hiring of executive branch employees, immigration, deportation of criminal illegal aliens, international policy, and much more.

There already have been moves to begin impeachment cases against some of the judges involved with the more egregious rulings, such as a Washington judge who ordered the administration to turn airplanes deporting criminal illegals around in midair and return the terror suspects to the U.S. He even demanded from the White House national security details to which he was not authorized to access.

Even Trump has called for the impeachment of that judge, James Boasberg, who had established a reputation as a leftist activist for demanding harsher penalties than the law allowed for J6 protesters in Washington.

Johnson said he's not planning to destroy any court, but was reminding people of the authorities of Congress.

Article III of the Constitution assigns to Congress the authority to "ordain and establish" courts beneath the Supreme Court.

The House Judiciary Committee has a hearing next week to review the leftist rulings that encroach on the executive branch authorities.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

An analysis of a ruling from Ana Reyes, a judge in Washington, that President Donald Trump's military must accept those with gender dysphoria, is taking her to task for singling out one political ideology – that could undermine America's national defense.

It is Charles "Cully" Stimson, of the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, who wrote at the Daily Signal that there is a long list of physical and mental conditions that disqualify individuals from being in the military.

Gender dysphoria is just one.

The analysis notes Reyes has barred Trump from expelling "certain transgender servicemembers" from the military, in a legal case that already is on appeal.

"The U.S. military exists to defend the nation. As an all-volunteer force, the military relies on qualified men and women volunteering to serve in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Space Force. Enlisted men and women are typically high school graduates, young, meet or exceed certain physical and mental aptitude tests, and pass security background checks. Officers are college graduates and must pass the same or similar tests as enlisted personnel," he explained.

"Not everyone is cut out to serve in the military. Far from it. Some don't want to serve. Others want to serve but are not eligible because they are overweight, have asthma, musculoskeletal issues, vision or hearing impairments, dental issues, allergies, skin conditions, psychiatric disorders, eating disorders, learning disabilities, or one or more of hundreds of other disqualifying physical or mental conditions. Others are eligible to serve but don't pass the minimum physical or mental tests," he said.

Significantly, the military cannot afford to hire those who have disqualifying medical, emotional or psychological conditions.

"That lawful discrimination is rationally related to a legitimate, indeed compelling, government interest. Our military must only hire men and women who are ready, willing and able, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year, to deploy anywhere in the world at a moment's notice and who have the physical, mental, emotional, and psychological stability and toughness to fight and win," he explained.

In fact, such deployability requirements have a list of "30 broad categories" that can disqualify personnel.

Among those listed under "Learning, Psychiatric, and Behavioral Disorders," disqualified are those with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, a history of learning disorders such as dyslexia, autism, schizophrenic disorders, delusional disorders, a history of being bipolar, depression, conduct "disorders," eating disorders, self-harm disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, dissociative disorders and many more.

"The military lawfully discriminates against myriad people with mental health conditions. We do so not because we are callous, unfeeling, or don't wish the best for people (including family members and friends) with these conditions," he explained.

"The profession of arms is different from all other professions. The demands, operational tempo, physical and mental stressors, and lifestyle are distinct from all (except for a small handful of) civilian jobs. That requires the military to make sensible, reasoned choices about who can and who cannot be allowed to serve in the armed forces of the United States."

Trump's order specifically noted that longstanding policy is that military members are "free of medical conditions or physical defects that may reasonably be expected to require excessive time lost from duty for necessary treatment or hospitalization."

He called for those with "gender dysphoria" to be moved out of the armed forces.

The analysis pointed that out Reyes "tips her hand" by using loaded language in her decision, calling people "marginalized persons.'

It explains Reyes falsely conflates "skin color, sex, and sexual orientation with people who suffer from a cognizable mental disorder, gender dysphoria," that that "infects" her opinion.

And her citation of the Constitution's reference to all being "equal" is a reach too far.

"When it comes to whether someone is physically, emotionally, or psychologically qualified to serve in the armed forces, everyone is not equal. True, everyone has equal value and dignity as a human being. But that's not the point. Equal value and dignity as a human being does not translate to equality of suitability to serve in the armed forces, a fact that Judge Reyes blatantly ignores."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The Indian media is celebrating Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to the U.S. as a landmark moment in international relations, trade, and technological collaboration. Yet, behind the diplomatic pleasantries and ambitious promises, there are profound implications that should concern every American worker. While the official narrative describes a mutually beneficial partnership, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), a powerful lobbying group with deep ties to India's government, is revealing a different reality, one where the biggest winner is India, while the American workforce is left to bear the consequences.

CII is not merely applauding this agreement; they are declaring victory. They have openly stated that this partnership will boost India's manufacturing, attract foreign direct investment, and create jobs, in India. Missing from their extensive coverage of this visit is any substantial mention of job creation for American workers or a commitment to strengthening U.S. industry or really any benefits for America. This omission is not accidental. It is a clear indication of what this deal is truly about, cementing India's rise as a global technology and economic powerhouse, financed in part by the American taxpayer.

As I have learned through CII's many articles and reports, this was not a sudden shift in U.S.-India relations, but rather a well-coordinated and orchestrated effort spanning over two decades, and now, it appears to be paying off exactly as intended.

For years, CII has meticulously positioned India as the ideal destination for U.S. investment, offshoring, and technology partnerships, using a strategic combination of corporate influence, policy lobbying, and diaspora leverage to embed itself deep within American economic and political systems. Every report, every initiative, and every policy recommendation they have put forward has been part of a long-term playbook designed to transform India into the dominant global leader in technology, manufacturing, and trade, with U.S. wealth, jobs, and innovation fueling that rise.

This latest agreement is not just another trade deal, it is the culmination of years of calculated maneuvering that has led to India's growing dominance in critical sectors like AI, semiconductors, cybersecurity, and defense technology. While American workers have endured waves of job losses, mass layoffs, and declining wages, India has steadily positioned itself as the primary beneficiary of U.S. corporate outsourcing, workforce displacement, and technology transfers.

This is not a coincidence. This is the result of a carefully executed strategy, one that CII and its network of industry insiders have worked toward for decades. And now, with this latest agreement, they are reaping the rewards of their efforts while Americans pay the price.

For years, Americans have been told that China is the greatest threat to our jobs, industries, and technological leadership. While Washington remains fixated on Beijing, India has methodically positioned itself as the next major global competitor, using strategic partnerships, outsourcing, and workforce displacement to advance its own economic agenda. The difference is that while China's rise has been met with bipartisan scrutiny, India's expansion has been largely facilitated by U.S. policy, American investment, and corporate influence.

A Closer Look at the U.S.-India Tech Agreement, Who Really Benefits?

This deal is being framed as a step toward strengthening America's technological and economic security, but the details suggest otherwise. The U.S.-India COMPACT framework and TRUST initiative focus on key industries, AI, semiconductors, cybersecurity, quantum computing, and defense technology, that are not just critical to economic growth, but to national security. The question that must be asked is why the U.S. is actively helping India expand its capabilities in these fields, rather than prioritizing investment in the American workforce.

The CHIPS Act passed to revitalize semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S., was designed to secure supply chains and reduce dependence on foreign production. Yet, this agreement simultaneously provides India with the means to expand its own semiconductor industry, positioning it as a direct competitor to American manufacturing. If the goal is to strengthen America's independence in semiconductor production, why are we simultaneously bolstering another country's ability to dominate the same industry?

The agreement also paves the way for increased AI and cybersecurity collaboration, with initiatives such as the Autonomous Systems Industry Alliance (ASIA) and INDUS-X defense collaboration. These programs will train and develop India's tech workforce with U.S. expertise, resources, and funding, ensuring that India's position in the global AI and defense technology sector continues to grow. This is not a theoretical concern, India has openly stated its ambition to lead in AI, semiconductors, quantum computing, and telecommunications. With American investments and training, that ambition is quickly becoming a reality.

The Impact on American Workers, More Offshoring, More Displacement

One of the most glaring concerns is what this agreement means for American jobs. The U.S. has already experienced the devastating effects of offshoring and workforce displacement through trade deals that prioritized foreign labor markets over domestic employment. This deal sets the stage for even greater job losses, particularly in technology, engineering, manufacturing, and cybersecurity.

The H-1B visa program has already led to the widespread replacement of American tech workers with lower-wage foreign labor, primarily from India, the same country where our jobs, technology, and intellectual property are being aggressively offshored.

Major corporations like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have been at the forefront of lobbying for more visas, enabling them to flood their U.S. workforce with Indian nationals while simultaneously cutting American jobs. At the same time, these companies are rapidly expanding their operations in India, investing billions into new tech hubs, engineering centers, and AI research labs, all while scaling back hiring in the United States.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

First it was conservative giants Donald Trump Jr. and Charlie Kirk who visited Greenland, and now Second Lady Usha Vance is headed to the region President Donald Trump wishes to acquire for the United States.

Usha Vance, the wife of Vice President JD Vance, will travel on Thursday to Greenland with her son and an American delegation for a three-day visit.

The White House said on Sunday: "On Thursday, March 27, 2025, Second Lady Usha Vance will travel to Greenland with her son and a United States delegation to visit historical sites, learn about Greenlandic heritage, and attend the Avannaata Qimussersu, Greenland's national dogsled race.

"The race brings together approximately 37 mushers and 444 dogs in a remarkable display of speed, skill, and teamwork. Ms. Vance and the delegation are excited to witness this monumental race and celebrate Greenlandic culture and unity."

The delegation is set to return to America on Saturday.

Before President Trump was sworn in for his second term on Jan. 20, his son Don Jr. and Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA landed in Greenland on Jan. 7 to express America's interest in the Danish territory.

"Don Jr. and my Reps landing in Greenland," the president-elect posted on Truth Social.

"The reception has been great. They, and the Free World, need safety, security, strength, and PEACE!

"This is a deal that must happen. MAGA. MAKE GREENLAND GREAT AGAIN!"

Elon Musk noted: "If the people of Greenland want to be part of America, which I hope they do, they would be most welcome!"

President Donald Trump also posted a video of a man from Greenland urging the U.S. to purchase the massive territory from Denmark.

"Buy us! Buy Greenland!" the man says as he puts on a red, Make America Great Again cap.

Trump attached his own message to the video clip, indicating: "I am hearing that the people of Greenland are 'MAGA.'

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Government schools, teachers' unions, and others with financial interests in high taxes for public schools long have opposed homeschooling.

When parents school their children at home, schools, and therefore teachers, have fewer students and get less tax money.

When homeschooling surges, as it has since the catastrophic public school response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the move of students out of public institutions actually could threaten their future.

So in Illinois, state lawmakers are reviewing a scheme from Democrats that would threaten homeschooling parents with jail sentences if they don't perform exactly as the public schools demand.

A report in the Federalist outlines the scheme.

The Democrats are demanding homeschool parents report themselves to local public school "officials," or face fines, charges, and jail.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A campaign by Democrats that involved putting up billboards in various districts where they believe GOP congressional incumbents could be vulnerable, making false accusations about "cuts" to Medicaid, have been taken down.

The House Majority Forward organization had launched the billboards in districts involving Reps. Gabe Evans, Colo., Don Bacon, Neb., Ryan Mackenzie, Penn., Monica De La Cruz, Texas, Jen Kiggans, Va., and Rob Wittman, Va., all Republicans.

But a report from the Washington Examiner explains they now are gone.

The vendor providing the billboards, Lamar Advertising, confirmed they were gone after it was warned by the National Republican Congressional Committee in a demand letter that it would be "liable for the defamatory messages spread to voters in each district."

The billboards accused the elected Republicans of "voting to cut Medicaid and give tax breaks to Elon Musk."

The GOP letter, obtained by the Examiner, warned, "Medicaid has not been cut by the federal government. No member of Congress has voted for cuts to Medicaid. House Majority Forward can only point to wishful speculation that cuts could occur sometime somewhere in the future— they cannot point to any cuts that have already taken place."

The letter warned the Democrats' agenda "willfully ignores the fact that their Republican targets have publicly voiced their support for Medicaid and perpetuates false claims to the contrary."

Lamar lawyer Wendi Loup responded, in a letter reviewed by the Examiner, that her staff confirmed the billboards are "no longer running."

The report cited a controversy about whether every billboard had been taken down, as some had been run by another vendor, but the Republicans said they would be taken down "in seconds."

Mike Marinella, a spokesman for the NRCC, explained to the Examiner, "This proves what we've been saying all along: Democrats have no winning message so they resort to lies and fear-mongering in a disgusting effort to distract voters. The American people aren't buying it, and House Democrats should be ashamed of themselves."

Such accusations against Republicans, false claims they want to cut Medicaid and Social Security, have "been the rallying call for Democratic lawmakers and progressive opposition groups since President Donald Trump took office," the report said.

The report said the billboards were up only some 24 hours in some districts.

Democrat spokesperson CJ Warnke said the claims were "verified," and the dispute involved Republicans trying to "silence free speech…"

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Says 10 police officers responded to her home despite no emergency

Late Monday night, Juanita Broaddrick, one of the women who claims President Bill Clinton raped her, says she was "swatted," with 10 law-enforcement officers and a SWAT team coming to her home.

Along with a video, Broaddrick posted on X: "Well, I just got swatted. About 10 police and swat team showed up. They said the caller said there were 2 masked men and people inside had been shot. This s–t needs to stop."

In the last couple years, there has been an increase in bogus calls to law enforcement, causing officers to show up at the homes of conservative politicians or activists, guns drawn.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

President Donald Trump on Monday declared a vast list of pardons issued by Joe Biden on his way out the door of the White House to be "VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT."

It is because those pardons, to a long list of his own family members, prominently including son Hunter Biden who was convicted of gun charge felonies and pleaded guilty to a list of tax charges and was facing possible prison time, were "done by Autopen."

On the social media site Truth Social, Trump confirmed:

The "Pardons" that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because of the fact that they were done by Autopen. In other words, Joe Biden did not sign them but, more importantly, he did not know anything about them! The necessary Pardoning Documents were not explained to, or approved by, Biden. He knew nothing about them, and the people that did may have committed a crime. Therefore, those on the Unselect Committee, who destroyed and deleted ALL evidence obtained during their two year Witch Hunt of me, and many other innocent people, should fully understand that they are subject to investigation at the highest level. The fact is, they were probably responsible for the Documents that were signed on their behalf without the knowledge or consent of the Worst President in the History of our Country, Crooked Joe Biden!"

WND had reported only hours earlier how Trump brought attention again to the allegations that some of Biden's orders and pardons might not be worth anything due to his cognitive decline.

He then posted on Truth Social images of the most recent commanders in chief, with Biden's official portrait displaying an autopen signature device.

Trump had voiced his concerns during a speech at the U.S. Justice Department headquarters in Washington on Friday, Trump said:

"Crooked Joe Biden got us into a real mess with Russia and everything else he did, frankly, but he didn't know about it, and he, generally speaking, signed it with autopen. So how would he know? …

"Who's doing this? When my people come up … [and say], 'Sir, this is an executive order.' They explain it to me. And 90% of the time I sign it and 99% of the time, I say, 'Do it,' but they come up and I sign it, but you don't use autopen."

"No. 1, it's disrespectful to the office. No. 2, maybe it's not even valid, because, you know, who's getting him to sign? He had no idea what the hell he was doing. If he did, all of these bad things wouldn't be happening.

A Heritage Oversight Project report called into question the validity of Biden's actions, finding the vast majority of documents signed by Biden used the mechanical device, including the last-minute pardons of Biden family members, Gen. Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and the members of the Jan. 6 Committee.

"We gathered every document we could find with Biden's signature over the course of his presidency," reads a Heritage Oversight post on X.

"All used the same autopen signature except for the announcement that the former president was dropping out of the race last year."

The controversy has led Republican Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey to urge Attorney General Pam Bondi to probe the matter.

"I am demanding the DOJ investigate whether President Biden's cognitive decline allowed unelected staff to push through radical policy without his knowing approval," Bailey said.

Trump's daughter-in-law Lara Trump, the former co-chair of the Republican National Committee and current Fox News host, told journalist Benny Johnson that Biden's entire presidency was orchestrated, and that he wasn't aware of anything he was signing.

"It's all been fake," Lara Trump said. "The signatures were fake. The hype around Kamala Harris was fake. Joe Biden being OK, fake. His Oval Office, [Trump counsel] Alina Habba the other day, exposed … remember the set that we used to see him on? It's fake!"

"It's just all been orchestrated and planned. And we as Americans honestly are lucky that nothing worse happened to this country over the past four years. Who the hell was in charge? I don't know. That is terrifying to know they're just using autopens. Literally, Benny, anyone could have signed anything for Joe Biden."

"This is why nobody wants to be a part of this party, 'cause it's all phony, it's all smoke and mirrors, it's all fake. And people want authenticity. They can smell phony from a mile away."

She also brought up House Speaker Mike Johnson's recent revelation that Biden himself had no idea he had paused LNG exports to Europe.

In January, Johnson called Biden's ignorance of the matter the "scariest thing I've ever seen."

"It occurred to me he was not lying to me," Johnson noted. "He genuinely did not know what he had signed. I walked outta that meeting with fear and loathing because I thought, 'We are in serious trouble.'"

Meanwhile, the New York Post reports: "A key aide to former President Joe Biden may have exceeded their authority by liberally using an autopen to sign official documents, according to two former White House sources, as President Trump's aides set up 'far more restrictive' rules governing the use of the mechanical device."

The Biden aide, who did not respond to requests for comment, would frequently make mention of what "the boss" wanted, the source said, but compatriots would have "no idea" if it was true because the internal culture was to not ask questions.

"I feared no one as much as I feared that [staffer]. To me, [the staffer] basically was the president," the person said. "No one ever questioned [the staffer]. Period."

"Everyone" was suspicious of this individual exceeding their authority when claiming to speak for the president, the source said. "But no one would actually say it."

"I think [the aide] was using the autopen as standard and past protocol," The Post's informant said.

"There is no clarity on who actually approved what – POTUS or [the aide]."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

PALM BEACH, Florida – President Donald J. Trump on Sunday renewed attention on allegations some of Joe Biden's executive orders and pardons may not be valid due to his cognitive decline, as Trump posted on Truth Social images of the most recent commanders in chief, with Biden's official portrait displaying an autopen signature device.

On Friday during his address at the U.S. Justice Department headquarters in Washington, Trump voiced his concerns out loud about Biden's use of the autopen, saying:

"Crooked Joe Biden got us into a real mess with Russia and everything else he did, frankly, but he didn't know about it, and he, generally speaking, signed it with autopen. So how would he know? …

"Who's doing this? When my people come up … [and say], 'Sir, this is an executive order.' They explain it to me. And 90% of the time I sign it and 99% of the time, I say, 'Do it,' but they come up and I sign it, but you don't use autopen."

"No. 1, it's disrespectful to the office. No. 2, maybe it's not even valid, because, you know, who's getting him to sign? He had no idea what the hell he was doing. If he did, all of these bad things wouldn't be happening.

A Heritage Oversight Project report called into question the validity of Biden's actions, finding the vast majority of documents signed by Biden used the mechanical device, including the last-minute pardons of Biden family members, Gen. Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and the members of the Jan. 6 Committee.