This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A Muslim mayor of Dearborn, Michigan, has stunned with his vitriol against a Christian resident of his city who simply objected to promoting violence.
Mayor Abdullah H. Hammoud scolded resident Edward "Ted" Barham, a Christian, "Although you live here, you are not welcome here."
Barham had objected to renaming some intersections in Dearborn after Osama Siblani, Arab American News publisher who has promoted Hezbollah and Hamas, both Middle East organizations that have inflicted death, destruction and terror on Americans.
Hammoud issued a dangerous suggestion for Barham to not see the signs.
"The best suggestion I have for you is to not drive on Warren Avenue or close your eyes while you're doing it. His name is up there and I spoke at a ceremony celebrating it because he's done a lot for his community," Hammoud claimed.
He then turned to a personal attack on his city's resident, accusing Barham of being "a bigot, and you are racist, and you're an Islamophobe. Although you live here, I want you to know as mayor, you are not welcome here. And the day you move out of the city will be the day that I launch a parade celebrating the fact that you moved out of this city."
Barham had explained Siblani is "a promoter of Hezbollah and Hamas. … He talks about how the blood of the martyrs irrigates the land of Palestine … whether we are in Michigan and whether we are in Yemen. Believe me, everyone should fight within his means. They will fight with stones, others will fight with guns, others fight with planes, drones, and rockets."
Fox News reported the signs actually were approved by the Wayne County commission, as the road is a county road, but the signs are inside Dearborn.
Barham compared the signs to naming a road "Hezbollah Street or Hamas Street," and said the "honor" for Siblani was "provocative."
Fox explained, "Dearborn, the city with America's highest-percentage Muslim population, has long navigated debate over cultural and political identity. For many average residents, the moment captured in City Hall begged the question of whether elected officials are willing to listen to all voices or only those they choose to celebrate."
WND reported only days ago that adjacent Dearborn Heights was forced into an embarrassing backtrack when officials announced a badge for police officers that said "Dearborn Heights Police" in Arabic.
The scandal even caught the attention of the late Charlie Kirk, co-founder of Turning Point USA, who was assassinated a week ago at a free speech event in Utah.
After an interval of only two days, Dearborn Heights Mayor Bill Bazzi went to social media to backtrack.
"On Wednesday, September 3rd, information was disseminated from the Dearborn Heights Police Department regarding a digital mock-up of the DHPD patch bearing the department name translated in Arabic script," his Facebook post said. "The design mock-up idea showed the words 'Dearborn Heights Police' in Arabic and was said to be optional. The patch effort was an internal discussion among some within the police department which was not put forth for consensus or further review."
But, he said, "Should efforts like this be formally undertaken to make any changes to the Police uniform, it is our goal to include multiple PD stakeholders for a larger conversation, to ensure all are included in the discussion. As we are one PD, each individual's uniform represents the DHPD as a whole, and therefore merits the review and input of all. At this time, this patch addition remains an idea and should NOT have been presented as an official prototype."
Dearborn Heights has a population of around 39% Middle Eastern or North African as of the most recent census, but triggered Republican Congressman Randy Fine with its announcement. He called it an example of "Sharia Law" coming to Michigan.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A young redheaded TikTokker, who goes by Ellie May on X, posted a video hoping it would get in front of the eyes of President Trump – and it has. The president posted it on his Truth Social account Saturday afternoon.
The woman pleads with the president to spearhead the passage of "The Charlie Kirk Act," which would hold media companies accountable for lying to the American people.
She cites 2013 action by President Obama that repealed the 1948 Smit-Mundt Act, a law that prohibited propaganda in the media.
"Make it damn near impossible for these people to continue to lie to the American public, which has brought chaos, hatred and division all across the country," she says.
"Because of their hateful lies, a man has lost his life. … Force journalists to finally start telling the truth."
WATCH:
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Americans marked the 24th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on their nation by Islamic terrorists with tributes, recollections, remembrances and more.
And one pilot took the opportunity to reveal how he thinks his jet, sitting on a runway that day, was intended to be the fifth aircraft hijacked and turned into a weapon of mass destruction.
Ceremonies were held Thursday in New York and at the Pentagon, both targeted that day, as well as in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, where a flight augured into the ground after a failed scheme to turn it into another weapon.
Nearly 3,000 civilians died that day.
Jennifer Nilsen explained to reporters that the loss of her husband, Troy Nilsen, is "heart-wrenching" every year.
Even those who weren't born by then marked the day.
But one man, Tom Mannello, has recollections that go a bit further.
He was to pilot United Airlines Flight 23 that day, and says it was his aircraft that was intended to be used as another "weapon of mass destruction" on that day.
But he said a terrorist's mistake saved the lives of those aboard.
In a report in the Daily Mail about a video documentary, he said, "I now believe that it is more likely than not that we were the fifth airplane. There's a good chance that somebody was planning to try to use our airplane as a weapon of mass destruction."
That flight was at New York's JFK airport, lined up to leave at about 9 a.m.
But it was called back to the gate after other jets hit the World Trade Center towers.
He said he learned afterward that box cutters – the weapons used by hijackers to gain control of other four flights – were discovered on an aircraft that was parked next to his jet that morning.
That craft was not due to depart, but it's number was one digit off of the one Mannello was flying.
He said he learned two box cutters were found in the seat pockets in the first class section in that empty jet.
"Connecting the dots, the captain now believes the box cutters placed inside the seats on the neighboring aircraft had been intended for his flight, which would have departed JFK at a similar time to the other deadly vessels," the report said.
He said he thinks the mistake was that someone, assigned to leave the box cutters for later use, left them in the wrong jet.
"If somebody was on the ground cooperating with them, they just simply made a mistake and put the box cutters on the wrong airplane," he said. "You have people who clean the airplane, people who load food on the airplane, who have access to the airplane."
Further, he explained that flight attendants on his plane later raised concerns about several passengers.
"Flight attendant Barbara Brockie-Smaldino recalled one individual dressed in a burka with a niqab, who she was convinced was 'really a man,'" the report said.
Another passenger even sought to take his son into the cockpit "to look around," a move that is strictly forbidden.
Further alarm bells rang when "attendants were trying to serve first-class passengers their food, but all onboard were insistent that they didn't want to eat." Instead, they wanted to take off.
A total of 2,977 people died when four jets were hijacked and intentionally crashed into New York, Pennsylvania and Washington.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
UPDATE: The sheriff's office has now reported that two students were injured in the shooting, plus the shooter, who also was hospitalized. All three, all minors, are considered in critical condition. No names were released immediately.
There's been another school shooting, this time at Evergreen High School in Colorado.
Initial reports say that at least three people, probably students, are in critical condition after being hospitalized.
A report from KDVR television said authorities in Jefferson County, which encompasses the foothills community of Evergreen about 25 miles west of downtown Denver, said there was an "active assailant" at the school.
A spokesperson for CommonSpirit St. Anthony Hospital in Lakewood told FOX31 that three people are in the hospital in critical condition related to the incident.
Authorities revealed a 911 call came in about 12:40 p.m. Mountain Time, and a warning was issued that people who have kids at the school should not try to go there, as it still was "an active scene."
The building was being evacuated room by room.
A reunification site was set up at Bergen Meadow Elementary, nearby.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
As a national furor over career criminals intensifies with the Charlotte murder of a Ukraine refugee, another repeat offender, this one in Louisiana, allegedly raped a 4-year-old girl and gave her a sexually transmitted disease just weeks after being released.
Now, surgical castration and the death penalty are being discussed among law-enforcement officials for 25-year-old Anthony Jelks.
WAFB-TV reports: "East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney Hillar Moore said Monday, Sep. 8, that his office is exploring every option in the case against Anthony Jelks, which could include surgical castration or the death penalty."
"I can't think of anything worse than raping a child," Moore said.
The station reported Morse is "well-known to Baton Rouge police, causing problems over the years spelled out in a plethora of paperwork filed with the 19th Judicial District Court."
Baton Rouge Police Chief T.J. Morse told WAFB the situation is "extremely frustrating."
"Mr. Jelks, we have arrested six times over the last six-seven years," Morse said.
"He has everything from firearm charges to domestic-abuse battery, violation of protective orders."
Elon Musk indicated: "This needs to stop."
Political commentator Gunther Eagleman said: "If they been arrested 6 times, the judge who lets him out should absolutely be held accountable when he commits another heinous crime."
Eric Daugherty of Florida's Voice noted: "'Previously arrested…released…' needs to STOP being a national headline. Our people are getting raped and murdered. The judges, district attorneys and state attorneys who allow this have blood on their hands."
As WorldNetDaily reported, U.S. Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla. says he'll introduce legislation to hold judges accountable when violent repeat offenders they release commit new crimes.
"It's easy to release criminals when you're protected by an armed bailiff at all times. The rest of us aren't so lucky," said Fine.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The man who created the inaccurate but much-used Black Lives Matter slogan "Hand's up, don't shoot" after Michael Brown rushed a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, 11 years ago, and was shot and killed, now has died in a shootout, which didn't involve police.
Dorian Johnson, claimed that his friend, Brown, had been compliant and accommodating when he confronted that officer, the officer who ultimately shot and killed Brown in self-defense.
A commentary at Twitchy explained, "The man whose lies helped propel BLM, causing death, riots, and destruction, has died in a fatal shooting in Ferguson, Missouri. In 2014, Dorian Johnson witnessed his friend Michael Brown rush a police officer in Ferguson. The officer fatally shot Brown in self-defense. But before the truth finally came out, lies were spread about the killing by Johnson, which created a national media-fueled outrage that was driven on by the later-debunked 'Hands up, Don't Shoot' chant and narrative."
Johnson died in a shooting not involving police only blocks from where Brown died.
"Posters are not missing the irony that a person who sparked an anti-police crusade died by the very violence that more policing could have helped prevent," the report said.
"Guess they decided his black life didn't matter. That happens a lot in rampant black-on-black crime. When the Brown shooting happened, 'journalists' and their fellow Democrats, seeing the opportunity to push a false narrative, jumped at the chance to do so. They helped spread the 'Hands Up, Don't Shoot' hoax nationwide."
A report by CNN said Johnson, 33, died in a shooting early Sunday morning at a block of apartments.
The investigation continues, although police said one person already is in custody.
Brown was 18 at the time he was shot by policeman Darren Wilson, a white man, on August. 9, 2014.
Wilson argued he shot Brown in self-defense as Brown charged at him. Johnson said he was a witness to the shooting and that there was a confrontation during which Brown was shot in the hand.
The report said, "Moments later, Brown moved back toward Wilson and the fatal shots were fired, according to federal investigators. Johnson said Brown had faced the officer with his hands up in surrender, but that assertion has been hotly contested, and a Justice Department investigation found that other witnesses 'gave varying accounts of exactly what Brown was doing with his hands as he moved toward Wilson,' including balling up his fists and pulling up his pants."
Johnson's claim about the events sparked that "hands up, don't shoot" mantra that was used over and over by extremists across the nation.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
As violent protests against ICE agents deporting illegal aliens continue across America, White House Border Czar Tom Homan says many of the protesters are actually being paid for their opposition, and federal officials will be prosecuting them to the "highest standards of the law."
Homan appeared on "Sunday Morning Futures" on the Fox News Channel, and was asked by guest host Jason Chaffetz about the authenticity of the protests.
"Some of it might be organic, but it does strike me, it seems like a lot of them are being bused in. You see them at the end of these protests actually getting back on buses," Chaffetz noted. "Are these protesters, the bulk of them, are they actually being financed from the outside?"
"Absolutely," Homan responded. "We know a lot these protesters are being paid. Many of them admitted to it.
"So yes, there's a whole effort right now identifying those who are funding these operations, those who fund the weapons that are being used. They'll be held accountable too and held to the highest standards of the law. They will be prosecuted too."
Homan said Americans need to understand that "ICE is enforcing the laws enacted by Congress. They appropriated funding to enforce these laws. If you don't like what ICE does, then go protest Congress, 'cause we're not making this stuff up."
"And what's most insulting, you've got members of Congress comparing ICE to Nazis and terrorists and racists. Well if they're racists for enforcing the law, what does that make them? They wrote the law."
"So members of Congress, everyone that wants to attack ICE, are disgusting. They're an embarrassment to the position they hold. They're members of Congress, and they don't like what ICE is doing? They do your job and legislate. Until then, President Trump and the men and women of ICE are gonna continue to prioritize public safety threats and national security threats and make this country safer every day."
Chaffetz, a former Republican congressman from Utah, told Homan he made a "good point," explaining: "I once upon a time served in Congress, and I was on the Judiciary Committee. I was on the Subcommittee on Immigration. Guess what. Democrats had the House and Senate and presidency. Do you know how many hearings they held? Two. One was with [late night comedian] Stephen Colbert. The other was to take the class photo. Do you know how many pieces of legislation they tried to move through to change the immigration laws that they are so upset about now? Zero."
Homan stressed there are consequences for being in the U.S. illegally, indicating "70% of everybody ICE is arresting is a criminal. The other 30% are gang members who don't have criminal histories."
He also said there's a difference between acting as a protester and a criminal interfering with ICE operations.
"You throw a stone, you're going to jail. You put hands on an ICE officer, you're going to jail. You make a threat, either online or in person, you're going to jail," Homan said.
"You cross that line and move from a protester to a criminal, zero tolerance. You will be prosecuted."
"You can protest all you want, exercise your First Amendment rights. You cross that line, you're going to jail."
Homan concluded by noting, "Over 1.5 million illegal aliens have left this country. And why have they left this country Because of President Trump and his policies. … We're showing the world there's consequences.".
"This is amazing, it's unprecedented and it's because of the leadership of this president."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Letitia James, the Democrat attorney general in the state of New York, is demanding an appeals court restore a $500 million penalty against President Donald Trump that a New York judge created.
It was Arthur Engoron who heard the case in which James alleged Trump and his companies committed fraud.
James, who herself is under investigation now on fraud charges of her own related to alleged lies she submitted on federal mortgage documents, claimed that the companies' actions left behind damages even though testimony during the trial, which went down without a jury, proved those who made loans to Trump were happy with them, they were all paid off, they made money off Trump and would like to do business with him again.
Engoron and James worked together to create the $500 million penalty, and then tried to arrange requirements so that Trump could not appeal. He did, and the appeals court bluntly said the fine violated the U.S. Constitution.
Now, a report in the Epoch Times reveals that James wants that constitutional violation restored.
The report explains she filed a notice of appeal to the New York Supreme Court, confirming she is appealing.
"The brief notice does not spell out arguments from James as to why the appeal should be allowed," the report explained.
It was the New York Appellate Division's First Judicial Department, a branch of the New York Supreme Court, that tossed the penalty in a fractured ruling but left the civil judgment against Trump.
Engoron ruled against Trump in February 2024 and issuing a judgment of more than $460 million, with interest accruing.
Even the appellate judges who thought James' claims of fraud were justified opposed her penalty.
"Justice David Friedman criticized James, saying she was focused on 'political hygiene, ending with the derailment of President Trump's political career and the destruction of his real estate business,'" the report said.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
As Americans learn that their nation's immigration and visa laws have been subject to phenomenal levels of abuse, particularly the H-1B visa, more subtle and tricky forms of abuse are being employed.
For example, the most powerful tech and finance brands don't just hire workers on H-1B visas directly. They also buy labor from layers of outside "consultancies" that recruit abroad, place people at client sites and skim a margin. Those layers, in turn, create a gray zone of accountability that invites wage theft, benching without pay and even classic kickback schemes in broader contracting.
The secondary-employer trap
Here's how it works: Big companies keep their "headcount" lean and shift cost and legal risk to outside vendors. Those vendors then subcontract to smaller "body shops," so the person coding in a blue-chip office may legally work for a tiny shop two layers down.
When layoffs hit or projects pause, the end client says the worker is not their employee and the vendor says the worker is "non-productive," which is where the abuse really starts.
Senators sounded this scheme out a decade ago when Southern California Edison replaced hundreds of its staff via outsourcers, an arrangement justified by claiming the utility was not the legal employer.
When layoffs hit or projects pause, the end client says the worker is not their employee and the vendor says the worker is "non-productive," which is where the abuse really starts.
Senators sounded this scheme out a decade ago when Southern California Edison replaced hundreds of its staff via outsourcers, an arrangement justified by claiming the utility was not the legal employer.
How secondary employers squeeze workers
Once a worker is on the vendor's payroll, the leverage flips. The Department of Labor has repeatedly found "benching" without pay and underpayment relative to required wages. Those violations are common in layered placements because time between client projects becomes unpaid "non-productive" time. Examples include multiple wage-recovery actions and guidance barring these tactics outright.
Wage theft at scale is not theoretical
The Economic Policy Institute's document-based investigation into HCL, a major supplier to big brands, found at least $95 million in apparent underpayments to H-1B workers through internal pay-level manipulations and off-books adjustments. The business model works because vendors can bill the client one rate yet quietly pay the worker another.
Kickbacks thrive in opaque vendor chains
When major corporations source labor through multiple layers of subcontractors, it opens the door for abuse. Intermediaries can demand "placement fees" or under-the-table payments in exchange for securing or keeping a project role. The Department of Justice has prosecuted kickback and bribery schemes in staffing and contracting, where vendor managers steered jobs in return for personal payoffs, even in cases that had nothing to do with immigration.
The risk multiplies as the number of middlemen increases. In parallel, DOJ investigations have also uncovered consultancy firms hoarding H-1B workers without real assignments, stockpiling them simply to gain leverage over competitors.
In the Cloudgen, LLC case, for example, a classic consulting "body shop" pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit H-1B fraud, admitting it placed workers on phony client letters and mismatched roles to game approvals. Cases like this reveal how easy it is to feed a layered labor market with questionable petitions.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) itself has acknowledged that the H-1B system can depress wages and displace U.S. workers when contractors flood client sites. Rulemaking over the last few years tried to tighten definitions of "third-party worksite" and "U.S. employer," but the layered model still lets brand-name clients claim they are not the employer of record.
The vast vendor ecosystem: A look into the success of the business model
All employer-to-vendor visuals are produced by the Red Line Project, using data pulled directly from employer applications filed with the Department of Labor. Each employer's secondary profile exposes a detailed roster of vendors operating behind the scenes. The takeaway is unmistakable: At many of America's largest brands, the individuals writing code and managing sensitive data are not direct employees at all, but are legally employed by third-party consultancies that specialize in visa staffing and subcontracting.
Every extra layer between the badge and the building is a place where wages can be shaved, fees shifted to workers and kickbacks demanded for a seat on a project. The end client gets the work and plausible deniability. The middlemen get the spread. And American workers get squeezed out of job interviews that should have been theirs.
The pattern is identical across telecom, finance, health care, banking and big tech. Different industries, same architecture. When the stacks grow, accountability shrinks. When the rosters lengthen, transparency fades. Americans are looking at a pipeline that turned their nation's visa program into a profit center for intermediaries.
These images are not abstract graphics. They are the footprint of a business model that is scaled by routing critical jobs through secondary employers. Clean up the layers and the unfair incentives disappear. Until then, the pictures tell the story better than words.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Managers at a manufacturing plant in Springfield, Missouri, attacked one employee for wearing a cross necklace to work, and for having a Bible at his desk.
They claimed those items made him "not inclusive" and "unapproachable" and they scolded him for being seen as part of a "clique," that is Christianity.
They insisted the workplace had to have a "neutral" environment and that he be "respectful to others."
Now those officials have gotten a very nicely worded letter pointing out that their actions likely were in violation of federal law.
It is the American Center for Law and Justice that confirms it has written to the Timken Co.'s Missouri plant to object to the treatment, and to insist on confirmation that the behavior will end and won't be repeated.
The ACLJ reported, "Just weeks ago, our client was summoned into meetings with HR leadership and plant management. He was ordered to remove his Bible from view, hide his cross necklace under his shirt, and refrain from openly expressing his Christian faith because it was allegedly 'not inclusive' and made him appear 'unapproachable.'"
The legal team noted one boss "even lectured him that being a Christian is about 'wearing it in your heart' rather than visibly living out his faith. Our client was appallingly told by corporate supervisors that his Bible and cross necklace were 'non-inclusive' and 'unprofessional.'"
The organization then confirmed it has dispatched a demand letter to the company, "calling on the company to immediately reverse course. We are demanding written assurances that our client will be allowed to keep his Bible on his desk, wear his cross necklace openly, and not be retaliated against in any way."
"The implications of this case extend far beyond one workplace. If left unchecked, this kind of discrimination sends a dangerous message that people of faith must hide their beliefs to keep their jobs. Religious liberty doesn't end at the office door. Every American has the right to live out their faith without fear of punishment or harassment. If a major corporation can tell one worker to hide his Bible and cross because they are 'not inclusive,' what's to stop your employer, your child's school, or even a government agency from doing the same to you or someone you love?"
The employee, whose name was not released, is in human resources at the company.
"He's a faithful Christian and has always lived out his faith in quiet and respectful ways. As part of his daily routine, he keeps a Bible on his desk for private reflection and to alleviate stress. He also wears a cross necklace as a personal expression of his beliefs. Neither his Bible nor his necklace has ever interfered with his work, nor have any co-workers ever complained. In fact, Timken's own handbook contains no rule prohibiting employees from wearing personal jewelry or keeping items on their desks," explained the ACLJ.
The law is, in fact, crystal clear: "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating against employees based on their religious beliefs or practices. Federal law protects an employee's right to wear religious symbols, keep religious objects in the workplace, and engage in non-disruptive religious observance. Courts have repeatedly held that punishing employees for such expression is direct evidence of unlawful discrimination," the ACLJ said.
The letter warns that the company now has "created a hostile workplace for [the employee] and anyone else espousing religious beliefs."