This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The hospital industry in the United Kingdom, which has been known to kill patients by refusing to feed them and has gone to court to make sure ill children die in its hospitals rather than seek overseas treatments, now has come up with a new one.

"Milk" from transgender women, that is, drugged biological men pretending to be women, is good for babies.

Just like a natural mother's milk.

The Telegraph in London has reported on the new extremism.

It explains a National Health Service Trust is claiming that breast milk from men, "is as good for babies as that produced by a mother who has given birth."

It was the University of Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust that said men can take a combination of drugs, then produce "milk" that is "comparable to that produced following the birth of a baby."

The trust runs Royal Sussex County Hospital and several other facilities, the report said.

It previously was a leader in the social engineering movement for transgenderism that labeled it "chestfeeding" instead of "breastfeeding."

The hospital cited five scientific papers dating to 1977 and the far-left World Health Organization, whose actions during the COVID-19 pandemic remain under suspicion, in saying there's "overwhelming" evidence for the benefits of "human milk."

Men who want to "chestfeed" must take the hormone progestin and Domperidone.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The administration of Joe Biden many times has simply issued a new edict, or a new "definition" of words, to expand its authority and power.

For instance, it has been ordered several times that "sex" discrimination, as used when Congress wrote multiple laws back in the 1960s and 1970s, means "gender identity" and such. His efforts have been aimed at making arbitrary changes to what words mean, to push forward his agenda.

But now a lawsuit has resulted, as a rancher is challenging Biden's arbitrary decision to put millions of acres out of reach for literally any use by calling it a national monument.

According to the Pacific Legal Foundation, Chris Heaton, a sixth-generation rancher, is suing for Biden's abuse of the Antiquities Act to call the million acres in Arizona a monument.

"The Antiquities Act exists to protect Native American archeological sites, not to give presidents unlimited power to declare vast swaths of land and sea out of bounds for productive use," explained Frank Garrison, a lawyer with the foundation.

"In our system of government, Congress makes the law, and presidents are not allowed to ignore the constraints Congress places on their authority."

While the federal law allows presidents to "create monuments on federally owned or controlled land," it also limits what may suddenly be protected to only historic landmarks, prehistoric structures, or other objects of historic or scientific interest.

Further, the legal team points out, "The statute also strictly limits a monument’s size to only what’s necessary for the care and management of the validly protected objects."

Biden, instead, has demanded the "Ancestral Footprints National Monument," to cover "entire landscapes, species, plants, and many other 'objects' that go well beyond the scope of the Antiquities Act."

That, the lawyers say, simply is not allowed by the law itself.

The foundation noted, "When the Supreme Court declined to hear a previous case challenging a similarly excessive monument designation, Chief Justice Roberts sounded the alarm, noting that '[a] statute permitting the President in his sole discretion to designate as monuments 'landmarks,' 'structures,' and 'objects'—along with the smallest area of land compatible with their management—has been transformed into a power without any discernible limit to set aside vast and amorphous expanses of terrain above and below the sea.'"

The rancher is fighting for the right to continue using the land his family has ranched for six generations.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A New York judge who has faced accusations he's biased against President Trump is demanding $364 million in fines in a fraud case brought by Attorney General Letitia James, who campaigned on a promise of "getting" Trump.

Further, she was unable during the trial to show that anyone lost anything to the claimed "fraud" schemes, that involved the valuation of Trump properties.

Major bank institutions who did deals with Trump during that time period testified there was nothing fraudulent about Trump's accounting.

The judge in the case repeatedly censored Trump's comments about the case, and in fact, denied him permission to make statements on his own behalf in court.

The judge, Arthur Engoron, issued his ruling on Friday. He had decided by himself, before the trial, that Trump and his companies were guilty of fraud. The trial was only about damages.

He also ordered that Trump not serve as an officer or director of any New York corporation for three years.

The results likely are to be appealed.

James originally had demanded $120 million in damages, but then exploded her demands to $370 million.

Engoron had refused to dismiss the case after Trump argued there was "tangible and overwhelming evidence" of bias on Engoron's part.

The Daily Caller News Foundation noted, "Trump’s real estate empire is the only big business that had been threatened with dissolution under the state’s anti-fraud law, an Associated Press analysis of nearly 150 civil cases across 70 years found."

According to Fox, "The court proceedings were contentious, with Engoron repeatedly placing Trump under a partial gag order to prevent him from criticizing court staff."

Trump dismissed James' allegations as a "witch hunt," and accused James and Engoron both of serving as political operatives for Democrats who want to foil his re-election bid this year.

His legal team also pointed out that no jury was part of the decision at any point.

"There was never an option to choose a jury trial," a Trump spokesperson said in an interview with Fox recently. "It is unfortunate that a jury won’t be able to hear how absurd the merits of this case are and conclude no wrongdoing ever happened."

Trump's lawyers pointed out that Trump's financial statements all had disclaimers, suggesting banks should conduct their own assessments, a routine business practice.

Fox said, "Throughout the trial, Trump attorneys brought witnesses, including former Deutsche Bank top executives, who testified the banks sought additional business from Trump, who they viewed as a 'whale of a client.' Trump's defense also brought in expert witnesses, including New York University accounting professor Eli Bartov, who reviewed the Trump financial statements at issue in the case and said he found no evidence of accounting fraud."

James, while campaigning for office, promised, "We’re definitely gonna sue him, we’re gonna be a real pain in the a--."

The Daily Caller News Foundation previously reported on the opinion expressed by George Washington University Law professor Jonathan Turley.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

There's long been controversy over adults dressing up in drag, or in otherwise sexually provocative clothing, and performing where children can see them.

Now it's turned about, with a report about a parade in Spain where children were staged in provocative costumes, then danced down the street in front of adults.

The report comes from VNN, which bluntly warns that the images are "disturbing."

The report describes the incident involved "young children dressed in lingerie" who were being "paraded down the street waving LGBTQ flags as adults cheer them on during an annual carnival."

It apparently was the Carnaval de Torrevieja where children, probably ages 8 or 9, "dressed in garter belts, X-shaped nipple shields, wigs, and makeup danced provocatively down the streets of Alicante."

The audience included adults, children, and even infants.

The report explained Voz Media identified those organizing the event as the Osadía troupe, a Barcelona-based street theatre company.

The report charged, "The hyper-sexualization of children appears to be accelerating despite the public beginning to push back against the trans and LGBTQ agenda worldwide."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The female shooter who opened fire Sunday at Joel Osteen's church in Texas is dead, authorities say.

"Officials in Houston say a five-year-old is in critical condition and another man is injured following a shooting at Joel Osteen's Lakewood Church. Another man was injured. The suspect is dead," reported the Houston Fox affiliate.

"It's heartbreaking," said Fox 26 reporter Abigail Dye.

"It's hard to find another word other than evil to bring a child to a church [for a shooting]. I have chills just thinking about it."

"We're not sure why any of this would happen in the first place."

The female suspect reportedly drove to the church with the 5-year-old child, and carried a long rifle under a trench coat as she entered the church between services, shouting she was packing a bomb.

But Houston Fire Chief Samuel Pena explained later at a news conference: "We have not found anything that is of concern to our community or to our nation."

The young boy injured in the crossfire was the child the woman brought to the church. Also injured by gunfire was a 57-year-old man. Officers killed the shooter at the scene.

One woman who was reunited with her loved ones noted: "The worship team, they were singing when the incident happened."

Law-enforcement authorities began tweeting about the situation while the shooting was unfolding.

"Shooter is down," Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez wrote on X as the scene was unfolding. "But it does not appear that@HCSOTexas deputies fired shots; other agencies fired."

"We continue to assist in a methodical/thorough search of the complex."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A new fight over racism has erupted in Illinois over a high school's race-based programs, which offer opportunities for studies only if they are black or Hispanic.

The complaint was filed by Parents Defending Education and charges that Illinois Math and Science Academy in Aurora, Illinois, is discriminating "on the basis of race in programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance."

That, the complaint charges, violates both Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

A report on the dispute at the Federalist explains the issue is "alleged racial discrimination by IMSA’s Brotherhood Sister Circle (BHSC), which provides so-called 'Culturally, Linguistically, and Economically Diverse' students an environment to 'learn about the history and current system of oppression in America' and 'develop relational leadership skills/stereotype management to confront related issues.'"

The school's program started several years ago, and gives IMSA's "black and 'Latinx'" students opportunities to "celebrate and enhance their strengths, creativity, intelligence, promote networking, community involvement, financial literacy, resources, and academic success," the report said.

The program, the complaint accuses, discriminates against students who are not black or Hispanic.

The complaint by the parents' organization notes that IMSA communications including emails and flyers directly promoting events for "black and Latinx students."

The report added that an email apparently from IMSA’s director of equity and inclusion, who appears to be Adrienne Coleman, asked about a list of "emails for the black and Latinx students.”

Then came instructions to have a school official "send a letter to parents as well."

PDE said other emails show that many retreat activities were "off-limits" to students who were not the correct race.

On March 8, 2022, a member of IMSA’s yearbook photo team emailed an undisclosed IMSA official, asking if their photographers would need to register and be "black or Latinx" to attend an event.

And another email specifically instructed that a number of "closed sessions" were exclusively for black and Hispanic students.

Promotions for events said the goal was to "provide black and Latinx students" with additional resources.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Reports already have documented that Joe Biden resorts to foul language, including the F-word, when he talks about President Donald Trump.

Now he's been caught using the same descriptive to reference a prominent U.S. ally, Bibi Netanyahu.

The Israeli leader, in fact, is a "bad f***ing guy," according to Biden.

It is the Jerusalem Post that cited a column from Politico that described Biden's egregious actions.

The name-calling happened in a private conversation, the report said.

Biden's White House denied it.

White House spokesperson Andrew Bates claimed, "The president did not say that, nor would he."

A report earlier from the Daily Caller News Foundation charged it also was in "private" settings that Biden used the offensive term to describe President Trump.

The report said, "At least three people have heard Biden call Trump a 'sick f***' in private settings, citing claims that Trump was cheering on the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol building, according to Politico. During his Jan. 6 speech near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, Biden reportedly almost used the term publicly, calling him 'sick' before letting the sentence trail off to applause and laughter from the crowd."

"Trump and his MAGA supporters not only embrace political violence, but they laugh about it,” Biden said during the speech. “At his rally, he jokes about an intruder, whipped up by the Big Trump Lie, taking a hammer to Paul Pelosi’s skull and echoing the very same words used on January 6th: ‘Where’s Nancy?’ And he thinks that’s funny. He laughed about it. What a sick —"

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A black puppeteer is suing after he was accused of violating a social agenda standard and using a "blackface" puppet.

"Blackface," wherever it was originally found, was common during the days of comedians and minstrel shows in America.

It's when a character assumes the physical identity of a black, no matter the circumstances.

Under today's "diversity, equity, and inclusion" agendas that are roiling American standards, it is a violation of the worst sort.

But the case at hand has some unusual characteristics.

A report from Politichicks explains that for years Franck Sylvestre has performed.

But this year he was canceled for Black History Month and he's suing the Red Coalition which berated him and made him a target.

"Sylvestre was born in France to parents from the French West Indies, he moved to Montreal and began putting on his own productions which combined music, slam poetry, dance and, this is where he got into trouble, puppetry," the report said.

"While Sylvestre’s previous black history month shows had gone without a hitch, he began presenting 'L'incroyable secret de Barbe Noire' or 'The Incredible Secret of Blackbeard,' meant for children, in which he acts out the part of a boy from his island home who on hearing a story from his grandfather discovers a treasure chest with gold from Cortez, of the famed pirate himself (while wearing a pink mask and wielding a wooden pirate sword) and a puppet," it continued.

Politichicks explained, "Sylvestre’s family had originated from Martinique, once the haunt of Blackbeard, and his shows had incorporated stories and legends from the West Indies. The puppet, named Max, is supposed to be a caricature of himself who steps into the story. Making lookalike and caricature puppets is common enough in puppetry, but the rules are different for Sylvestre and his face."

The puppet is black.

So the activists in Red Coalition condemned his sponsors for tolerating "a clearly racist children's play featuring a grotesque blackface puppet."

The group charged his show was "totally not acceptable."

Sylvestre said the puppet actually is a representation of himself, and his artistic license allows him to utilize a variety of comedic tools.

But a government agency in the Montreal area gave in to the pressure group and canceled his show.

So he's going to court, seeking damages for defamation, from the chief of the Red Coalition.

The report noted, "Sylvestre’s lawsuit mentions that Babineau had smeared him by derisively calling him a 'bon noir' or 'good black' and suggesting that he enables white supremacy."

The report added, "Sylvestre sees this as an issue of artistic freedom, but it’s also a question of who decides what’s racist. We used to associate racism with unthinking prejudice, but the response of Canada’s professional anti-racism class was filled with unthinking prejudice. On seeing Sylvestre’s caricature puppet of himself they immediately reacted with some very racist prejudices."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Joe Biden's decline has been evident for a long time. He sometimes can't find his way offstage, he calls publicly on people who are dead, and his words are sometimes a mix of syllables and conjunctions that lack meaning.

After all, he's 81.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

COVID-shot skeptic Steve Kirsch has released a Substack report that charges there’s no doubt that the COVID shots “CAUSE dementia.”

The shots, by Pfizer and others, were developed at a breathtaking pace with government funding when the deadly COVID virus came out of a Chinese research lab that was working to make viruses worse.

They were inflicted on the American public without ordinary trials or tests, often by corporate or government mandate, and the side effects, including tens of thousands of deaths, have been mounting since.

He explained that he reviewed data on the government’s National Vaccine Information Center and confirmed hundreds of cases of the virus “where [a] symptom is dementia.”

He explained, “There is [no way] that you can have a 1,000X increase in event reports if the COVID vaccine isn’t causing this. The CDC simply ‘forgot’ to warn people about it.”

Actually, the COVID shots can be described as DNA treatment more accurately than a vaccine.

”The results are self-explanatory: the COVID vaccines cause dementia,” he charged. “Anyone who tells you ‘correlation isn’t causation’ should explain the actual cause of this if it wasn’t the COVID vaccine.”

Kirsch long has been known as a COVID shot skeptic. Online, he’s blasted as a “promoter of misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines,” but the critics don’t document his “misinformation.”

What they show is he raised questions about the government’s talking points about COVID and those shots, which have been known to produce side effects like sudden collapse and death, heart problems, and more.

Kirsch’s influence comes from his founding of multiple companies and his development of the optical mouse.