This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Who exactly is the person who controlled the use of Joe Biden's presidential autopen?
According to David Sacks, President Donald Trump's crypto and artificial intelligence czar, it was actually Democrat U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts who ran the electronic signature device.
"SHHH DON'T TELL JOE!" said Jesse Watters of Fox News after Sacks spilled the beans on his "Primetime" show Tuesday night.
"David Sacks just said POCAHONTAS had the AUTOPEN and wasn't afraid to use it!"
Sacks claimed Warren ran the autopen due to her "pathological hatred of the crypto community."
"This is the financial system of the future, Jessie, and we have to encourage it. What the Biden administration was doing – and let's face it, it wasn't Biden – Elizabeth Warren controlled the autopen during that administration," Sacks said.
"She, for some reason, has this pathological hatred of the crypto community. She wants to drive this community offshore; she doesn't want it happening in the United States. That's the wrong policy for the United States.
"We want all the innovation happening here. This is a financial system of the future. It's cheaper, it's more efficient – we want it happening here, Jessie. And I think people are thrilled that President Trump is making that possible."
About two hours before Watters' program aired, Trump took to Truth Social to address the autopen mystery, saying: "Other than the Rigged Presidential Election of 2020, the Biggest Scandal in American History is the 'AUTOPEN!'
"Whoever used it was usurping the power of the Presidency, and it should be very easy to find out who that person (or persons) is.
"They did things that a Joe Biden, of sound mind, would have never done, like, Open Borders, Transgender for everyone, men in women's sports, and far more. Fear not, however, we will bring America BACK, BIGGER, BETTER, AND STRONGER THAN EVER BEFORE!"
House Oversight Chairman James Comer has already identified five Biden aides allegedly involved in the cover-up of Biden's deteriorating cognitive abilities as well as the autopen scandal.
On May 22, he sent letters to President Biden's physician and former White House aides demanding they appear for transcribed interviews.
Comer is demanding testimony from Biden White House physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor, former Director of Domestic Policy Council Neera Tanden, former Assistant to the President and Senior Adviser to First Lady Jill Biden Anthony Bernal, former Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff Annie Tomasini, former Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of Oval Office Operations Ashley Williams.
Comer said: "The cover-up of President Biden's obvious mental decline is a historic scandal. The American people deserve to know when this decline began, how far it progressed, and who was making critical decisions on his behalf.
"Key executive actions signed by autopen, such as sweeping pardons for the Biden Crime Family, must be examined considering President Biden's diminished capacity. Today, we are calling on President Biden's physician and former White House advisers to participate in transcribed interviews so we can begin to uncover the truth.
"In the last Congress, the Biden White House blocked these individuals from providing testimony to the Oversight Committee as part of the effort to cover-up Biden's declining health. Any continued obstruction will be met with swift and decisive action. The American people demand transparency and accountability now."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
There have been plenty of anti-Trump performers who have chafed at the president taking an active role at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, Washington, D.C.'s premier cultural venue, including some whose opposition resulted in the cancellation of a performance of the hit musical "Hamilton."
But now a legendary Tony-winning Broadway actress is resorting to violent language, saying the facility now "should get blown up."
In a recent interview, Patti LuPone, a three-time Tony winner and two-time Grammy awardee, also said New York should secede from the Union. Lupone's remarks were reported in The New Yorker Monday.
In February, Trump took action to "dewokify" the Kennedy Center, posting to Truth Social:
"I have decided to immediately terminate multiple individuals from the Board of Trustees, including the Chairman, who do not share our Vision for a Golden Age in Arts and Culture. We will soon announce a new Board, with an amazing Chairman, DONALD J. TRUMP! Just last year, the Kennedy Center featured Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth — THIS WILL STOP. The Kennedy Center is an American Jewel, and must reflect the brightest STARS on its stage from all across our Nation. For the Kennedy Center, THE BEST IS YET TO COME!"
The New Yorker interviewer reported:
[Lupone is] even angrier at the rest of the country. She told me, more than once, that the Trumpified Kennedy Center "should get blown up." In the S.U.V., apropos the current Administration, she pronounced, "Leave. New York. Alone. Make it its own country. I mean, is there any other city in America that's as diverse, as in-your-face? It's a live-or-die city, it really is. Stick it out or leave." The car dropped her off at a restaurant on the Upper West Side. She asked for sherry – she'd discovered it while doing "Les Misérables" in England in the eighties – but the bartender said that they didn't carry it, so she settled for a glass of rosé, with a side of ice cubes.
The Gateway Pundit notes that LuPone went viral in 2017 for calling Trump a "motherf–-er" on the Tony Awards red carpet.
The Trump-run Kennedy Center has noticeably turned a corner regarding its cultural offerings. It is hosting a free family screening of "The King of Kings" at the Concert Hall on June 1. The Christian film takes audiences on a "Journey through history alongside a young boy as he witnesses Jesus' miracles, trials, and ultimate sacrifice."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A court is being asked to act against state officials who bypass the requirements of their own state constitution.
The situation is that while the Alabama Constitution "makes it clear that if the government wants to come searching on your property, they need a warrant based on probable cause," agents from the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources simply cite a statute to ignore that requirement.
The Institute for Justice is now working with three Alabama residents to sue over the practice that has agents invading and searching private property not only without a warrant, but without consent.
The plaintiffs are Killen residents Dalton Boley and Regina Williams, and Muscle Shoals resident Dale Liles, who all took action after facing "multiple" privacy intrusions by game wardens.
None ever has been charged with hunting violations, "yet game wardens have snooped around on their properties without warrants on multiple occasions. That's because of an Alabama statute that allows game wardens to 'enter upon any land … in the performance of their duty.' Whether it's a posted field or residential yard, the statute gives wardens broad power to roam around private property without any warrant," the IJ said.
But, IJ lawyer Suranjan Sen explained, "The Alabama Constitution makes it clear that if the government wants to come searching on your property, they need a warrant based on probable cause, and game wardens are not exempt from the Constitution."
Williams owns 10 acres in Killen and had used it for decades, but as she aged she gave her neighbor, Boley, and his family permission to use it.
Then the game wardens arrived.
"This used to be a place where I could come to relax and get away from it all, but now that I know someone could be snooping around, I find it hard to just go there and relax," said Boley, who has faced unsubstantiated accusations from the agents.
"In Muscle Shoals, Dale owns and leases a combined 86 acres with sprawling fields, marshes, and swamps. Unlike Dalton and Regina, Dale does use his land for hunting with his kids and grandkids. There are two entrances to the land: a private gravel road and a gated entrance. Dale first saw a game warden's truck parked on his land in August 2018. He tried to talk to the warden, but he sped away," the IJ said.
The game wardens appeared again.
A trail camera then caught yet another game warden on the land.
"I'm all about preserving our wildlife and great outdoors—that's why I'm the president of my local Ducks Unlimited chapter. But game wardens still have to respect people's rights," said Liles. "Aside from my own privacy concerns, I don't like that the wardens don't wear orange when they're roaming around. It makes it very dangerous when you're hunting with rifles and people aren't wearing colors that make them easy to see."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
President Donald Trump has said over and over he wants to eliminate the federal Department of Education.
That bureaucracy hands out money and sets rules, but actually it is local school boards and state agencies that manage much of the decision-making in the education industry.
But the department still exists, and while it still has offices and staff, it is making changes.
Those include a whole new set of priorities for its grant programs.
A report at PJMedia documents how Linda McMahon, Trump's education secretary, has called for "evidence-based literacy, expanding education choice, and returning education to the states."
The report noted, "The federal government was never constitutionally supposed to be involved in running education, and its involvement has contributed to the crisis of crashing test scores, woke indoctrination, dysfunctional youth, and much more."
"Discretionary grants coming from the Department of Education will now be focused on meaningful learning and expanding choice, not divisive ideologies and unproven strategies," McMahon said.
"It is critical that we immediately address this year's dismal reading and math scores by getting back to the basics, expanding learning options, and making sure decisions in education are made closest to the child."
Various changes are possible: "Expansion of charters, innovative school models, K-12 open enrollment, dissemination of information on choice options, implementation of ESAs, home based education, concurrent enrollment programs, career preparation, postsecondary distance education, skills-based education, apprenticeships, work-based learning, accelerated learning and tutoring, etc.," the report said.
The report noted that the priorities are "a major change from the Biden-Harris administration, which obsessed over implementing woke diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) standards into our school system, worsening an already severe educational crisis. Race-baiting doesn't teach kids anything useful or help them improve their grades — quite the opposite."
The department announcement confirmed what many Americans already knew, the problems from the Biden administration, such as:
"Pushing student racial diversity through diversity plans, admissions policies, and technical assistance;
Also, embedding DEI in educational subjects and programs such as civics, STEM, and career and technical education;
And, focusing on diversity amongst educators instead of sound teacher preparation;
Also, promoting social emotional learning; and
Supporting divisive school diversity and social justice policies."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A suspect in a vicious shooting attack outside the Capital Jewish Museum that left a young, soon-to-be-married, couple dead has been charged with murder.
A report from ABC revealed Elias Rodriguez, 31, of Chiago, was taken into custody at the scene.
A criminal complaint said the two counts of murder were based on his actions in firing 21 times at the young couple, staff members of the Israeli Embassy, Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim.
Reports revealed the viciousness of the attack, in which after shooting the couple, the gunman followed one victim who was crawling away and repeatedly shot again and again.
An Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs official said Lischinsky was a researcher in the political department of the Israeli Embassy, while Milgrim organized U.S. missions to Israel.
The network report detailed, "Rodriguez allegedly walked past the two victims and then 'brandished a firearm from the area of his waistband,' court documents said. He is captured on video 'extending both his arms in the direction' of the victims, and began firing 'several times," the documents said."
The report said the suspect continued firing at the victims after they fell to the ground.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "My heart aches for the families of the beloved young man and woman, whose lives were cut short by a heinous anti-Semitic murderer. I have instructed to increase security arrangements at Israeli missions around the world and security for representatives of the state."
In Washington, police said there would be an increased presence by officers at schools and Jewish community centers.
Kristi Noem, the U.S. secretary for the Department of Homeland Security, said on social media, "We are actively investigating and working to get more information to share. Please pray for the families of the victims. We will bring this depraved perpetrator to justice."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
O'Keefe Media Group has released video of the "temple" found on Little St. James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, the retreat belonging to the late convicted sex-abuse kingpin Jeffrey Epstein.
A report at the Gateway Pundit said the footage obtained by James O'Keefe and his OMG organization "shows a 360 degree view of Epstein's temple with a celestial ceiling, astrological figures and bizarre statues."
The report noted, "Many of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes were committed on his private island Little St. James in the Caribbean."
An earlier video showed Epstein's bedroom, and the ominous names and numbers on the speed dial for his bedside telephones.
OMG has been releasing details about Epstein's residence.
Previously, O'Keefe released images and details about Epstein's private library.
Epstein died in a New York jail while awaiting further court hearings on new charges.
An initial video release disclosed images from Epstein's kitchen, including a disturbing image in a photograph of a nude infant sitting in a sink.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Former President Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an "aggressive" form of prostate cancer "with metastasis to the bone."
A statement from his personal office Sunday indicated: "Last week, President Joe Biden was seen for a new finding of a prostate nodule after experiencing increasing urinary symptoms.
"On Friday, he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, characterized by a Gleason score of 9 (Grade Group 5) with metastasis to the bone.
"While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management.
"The President and his family are reviewing treatment options with his physicians."
President Donald Trump reacted to the news on Truth Social: "Melania and I are saddened to hear about Joe Biden's recent medical diagnosis. We extend our warmest and best wishes to Jill and the family, and we wish Joe a fast and successful recovery."
Dr. Marc Siegel, Fox News' senior medical analyst, told anchor Jon Scott: "I'm a little taken aback that it's this far advanced."
"I wouldn't say it's ominous, but I'd say it's very, very concerning and clearly a life-threatening situation."
He noted about "80% of men at the age of 80 have some prostate cancer cells in their body" and that "the five year survival rate is somewhere between 30% and 40%."
Peter Doocy, the White House correspondent for Fox News, said, "It's very sad to hear."
"As far as the diagnosis, we just know what we're told," Doocy continued. "White House officials assured us through July of last year that he was healthy enough to serve another term."
"Who knows how long they've actually known about it?"
Jeff Mason, the Reuters White House correspondent, extended his best wishes to the 82-year-old Biden and his family, and explained, "From a political angle, it will absolutely, when you set aside the realities, the health issues he's now dealing with which is private but also a story as a former president, it will also raise questions again about his decision to run for re-election."
"A lot of those questions were focused on his mental acuity, but his age of course means there's a higher likelihood of having diagnoses and diseases that come to you as you get older."
When asked if he thought the diagnosis would create more sympathy for Biden, Mason responded: "I don't know the answer to that but I think certainly the American people and people in general when they see somebody facing a diagnosis with this, have sympathy. And I'll be interested to watch how that sympathy manifests itself in terms of how people respond on Capitol Hill from both parties."
Meghan McCain, daughter of former U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who died of brain cancer in 2018, said on X: "Cancer is the absolute worst. It is hell. It is incredibly difficult for any family, anywhere that has to deal with it.
"Wishing nothing but healing, prayers, light and strength to President Biden and his family. I don't believe times like these are appropriate for politics."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
In August 2024, the U.S. Small Business Administration signed a five-year agreement with the government of India to promote Indian small- and medium-sized enterprises in the global marketplace. Framed as a knowledge-sharing partnership, the deal includes digital matchmaking tools, joint programs on access to capital and shared training on export finance, green technology and women-owned entrepreneurship.
Diverging narratives: India's ambitions vs. U.S. indifference
Despite being presented as a "landmark" agreement by the Small Business Administration, the U.S.-India MSME Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) received virtually no coverage in major American media outlets. It was not reported by The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, or major networks such as CNN or Fox News. Most mentions came from Indian outlets, industry blogs, or government press releases.
This absence of domestic attention raises serious questions about how much priority the U.S. government and media actually place on a deal that claims to advance American small-business interests.
The only notable U.S. commentary came from a blog post by the SMB Center, which bluntly assessed the agreement's relevance for American entrepreneurs: "In reality, for most small business owners in the U.S., this agreement won't have much of an impact on your day-to-day operations or immediate business prospects. … It largely means nothing for the average small business owner."
The India media, however, highlighted how this new agreement will address issues related to India's MSMEs (micro, small and medium enterprises), including provisions to exchange expertise that will improve MSME participation in the global market, access to trade and export finance, technology, digital trade, green economy and trade facilitation.
This contrast in media coverage underscores a troubling gap: While India sees strategic gain and has deployed national resources to capitalize on the MoU, the U.S. has not mobilized its small business community or mainstream media to do the same, leaving American entrepreneurs in the dark while a foreign government positions itself to benefit.
What seems to be additionally concerning is that the five-year agreement did not appear in President Trump's U.S. Trade Representative's 2025 Trade Policy Agenda and Annual Report, while other similar SBA agreements for other countries did.
Opening American systems to foreign service providers
The agreement gives Indian firms direct access to U.S. companies and service providers through a government-backed "business matching digital platform," along with programming on trade finance, commercialization and digital technologies, all supported by the U.S. Small Business Administration.
Critically, the SBA agreement makes no distinction between high-value, innovation-driven startups and low-cost outsourcing firms. It imposes no requirement for participating foreign entities to comply with U.S. labor standards, employment protections, or tax obligations.
It also fails to acknowledge that many of these Indian small- and medium-sized enterprises often operate as outsourcing vendors, offering services such as customer support, IT maintenance, accounting and administrative operations, roles that have long been offshored to the detriment of American workers. According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, American companies spent over $36 billion on imported business services from India in 2023.
Technology and intellectual-property risks remain unaddressed
The SBA agreement further opens the door to joint programming around technology, digital trade and innovation without any clear guardrails for data protection, commercial confidentiality, or export controls. India's Ministry of MSMEs actively manages programs that fund domestic startups to commercialize technologies, many of which are developed through international partnerships with foreign firms.
At the same time, India remains on the United States Trade Representative's Priority Watch List for systemic failures in intellectual-property enforcement. The USTR has cited "high rates of counterfeiting and trade secret theft," among other issues including a lack of adequate protections for U.S. innovators and investors.
Despite these unresolved concerns, the August 2024 SBA agreement creates new, direct pathways for Indian firms to access U.S. companies, innovation hubs and federal small business resources, particularly in high-growth sectors like green energy and digital infrastructure.
American small businesses, many built on proprietary technologies and unique workflows, are now expected to share space in SBA-facilitated engagements without any assurance their innovations won't be reverse-engineered or replicated abroad.
This raises a critical question: Does the SBA agreement provide India's MSMEs with the very access the USTR has consistently withheld? And in doing so, has the U.S. government created a backdoor for India to bypass trade enforcement mechanisms meant to protect American technology and innovation?
Record U.S. closures as foreign partnerships grow
While the SBA was expanding trade access for India, American small businesses were closing in record numbers back home.
In 2024 alone, the U.S. Small Business Administration reported more than 600,000 American small business closures. According to the latest data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. retailers announced over 7,100 store closures, a staggering 69% increase from the previous year.
The wave of shutdowns hit both major chains like CVS, Walgreens, and 99 Cents Only, as well as thousands of small, independently owned shops across the country.
Rising inflation, supply chain disruptions and tighter capital markets pushed many small enterprises out of business. The odds remain grim as nearly 1 in 5 small businesses fail within their first year and by year five, nearly half have shut down.
Yet even in the face of this crisis, the SBA appears to have shifted its focus away from its core mission of supporting American small businesses. Instead, its international engagement strategy prioritizes deeper integration with India's export infrastructure, leaving struggling U.S. entrepreneurs behind.
Meanwhile, across the globe, India is celebrating the results. In a government press release titled "2025-26: Fueling MSME Expansion – Credit access, digitisation, and business-friendly reforms lead the way," India's Ministry of MSME reports that contributions from Indian micro, small and medium enterprises have tripled between 2021 and 2024–2025.
The contrast couldn't be clearer: As American small businesses shutter under economic pressure, the U.S. government is helping fuel India's MSME boom, opening U.S. markets, sharing resources and forging partnerships that offer little in return for the American worker.
One agency, two outcomes
For small businesses in the United States, 2024 brought thousands of closures, record debt burdens and tighter access to capital. Even firms approved for SBA loans reported delays or funding gaps too large to survive.
Yet while domestic businesses face mounting pressure, the SBA formalized a multi-year agreement that promotes the international expansion of a foreign small-business sector, one that is already displacing U.S. labor, absorbing global investment and operating under rules that shield it from the obligations American firms must meet.
The SBA's partnership with India does not include a mechanism to measure or limit job displacement. It does not restrict foreign participation based on trade compliance or intellectual-property risk. And it does not ensure any tangible benefit to the struggling small businesses across America, the agency was created to serve.
As India celebrates a new era of economic dominance, America's small businesses are left behind, underfunded, underprotected, and outmatched by a foreign system our own government is helping to build.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Microsoft has quietly filed notice with its home state of Washington that 2,000 jobs will be cut at its Redmond headquarters beginning July 13. The layoffs, according to the May 13 announcement, are part of a broader downsizing strategy to "reduce management layers."
There was no press conference. No apologies. Just a bureaucratic filing that confirmed what many American workers already suspected – that their jobs are no longer essential to the company they helped build.
Yet lurking beneath the surface of this corporate downsizing is a sweeping corporate realignment with global and geopolitical implications.
For while Microsoft is cutting thousands of jobs in the United States, the company is simultaneously executing its most aggressive expansion ever into a single foreign nation: India. From billion-dollar investments in AI infrastructure to skilling programs to government partnerships and cloud capacity, Microsoft is actively repositioning India, not the United States, as the centerpiece of its AI empire.
How Microsoft is using AI to replace American labor and redirect investment overseas
Globally, Microsoft is on pace to spend $80 billion this fiscal year on data centers to power its AI future. But that investment isn't fueling jobs in America, it's powering layoffs. Microsoft executives admitted at a recent JPMorgan conference that "AI is saving us hundreds of millions a year" by replacing human labor in customer support alone.
But what the company won't say publicly is this: The AI revolution they're funding isn't just about innovation, it's about offshoring – about products and services being designed, deployed and expanded in India, funded by U.S. dollars and built using technologies born in America. The very business models pioneered in the United States are now being used to undercut the American workforce and hollow out the very economy that fuels Microsoft's success and the bulk of its revenue.
In 2024, Microsoft earned $124.70 billion from the United States, accounting for 50.87% of its total earnings. In contrast, India contributed just $2.74 billion, a mere 1.12%. Yet India is where the company is placing its biggest bets.
How Microsoft turned its back on American workers
This isn't Microsoft's first move in this direction. In 2023, the company laid off 10,000 employees, nearly 5% of its global workforce, while quietly ramping up hiring overseas. In a company-wide email, CEO Satya Nadella tried to soften the blow: "While we are eliminating roles in some areas, we will continue to hire in key strategic areas." Left unsaid was that these "strategic areas" were overwhelmingly outside the U.S. and largely excluded Americans.
As U.S.-based engineers, project managers and customer service teams were handed pink slips, Microsoft expanded its international footprint with no such downsizing abroad. In fact, the company's head of India and South Asia, Puneet Chandok, made it clear in a press interview that there would be no layoffs in India.
AI empire: Made in India
Just months earlier, Microsoft's Nadella stood on stage in Bengaluru to announce the company's largest-ever foreign investment, $3 billion to build out AI infrastructure in India. This includes expanding data centers, cloud capacity and an aggressive AI workforce training program that will "skill" 10 million people in India by 2030, 2.4 million of whom were already trained in the past year. The announcement, made with little fanfare in the United States, was the largest foreign investment Microsoft has made in more than a decade.
"India is rapidly becoming a leader in AI innovation. … These investments in infrastructure and skilling … reaffirm our commitment to making India AI-first," Nadella said during a press conference hosted by the Indian government.
Microsoft's president of India and South Asia, Puneet Chandok, added: "Today's announcement strengthens our belief in India's potential and our resolve to equip the country with the resources and future-ready skills needed to excel in the global marketplace." Chandok extolled Microsoft's "commitment to copiloting India on its journey to become an AI-first nation."
Microsoft's partnership is with the IndiaAI Mission, the Indian government's flagship program that explicitly aims to dominate global AI applications by attracting foreign capital, embedding Indian infrastructure into international systems and forging deep partnerships with U.S. tech giants like Microsoft.
India: 'the world's leading nation'?
India has made no secret of its ambition to become a global economic superpower by 2047, and Microsoft is helping make it happen.
India's strategy is straightforward: Attract foreign capital, embed Indian infrastructure into global systems and acquire leadership through international partnerships, not organic innovation. As scientist and international speaker Dr. Pratik Mungekar has plainly declared, "In the quest for global supremacy and recognition, India has set its sights on a momentous goal – to claim the mantle of the world's leading nation by 2047."
While Microsoft openly fuels India's ambitions abroad, in the U.S. the American-born company is selling a different narrative. In a January 2025 blog post titled "The Golden Opportunity for American AI," Microsoft Vice Chair Brad Smith outlines what appears to be a patriotic call to action: Invest in U.S. infrastructure, protect American innovation and promote AI leadership on the world stage. Smith opens with praise for President Trump's 2019 executive order on AI, which emphasized securing critical technologies and protecting America's AI edge from strategic competitors like China.
At first glance, the message appears aligned with U.S. interests and like a national strategy. In reality, it's a veiled push for India.
For while Smith invokes President Trump's 2019 executive order emphasizing the importance of protecting America's technological advantage in AI from "strategic competitors and adversarial nations," just paragraphs later, the blog downplays these protections, calling instead for a race to "spread American AI to allies and friends" and urging U.S. policymakers to empower companies like Microsoft, Google and Amazon to expand their global infrastructure with fewer regulatory constraints.
While claiming to support American leadership, then, the real message is clear: Move fast, bypass red tape and expand overseas, especially to countries like India. What's left out is the glaring contradiction. Microsoft, Google, Amazon and others have already invested heavily in India, building cloud regions, establishing AI labs and embedding their technologies across India's digital economy. These aren't emerging opportunities, they're established footholds. And now, under the guise of "exporting American AI," Microsoft is lobbying Washington to support and accelerate that shift even further.
Meanwhile, the supposed urgency of outpacing China is being used as a fear-based distraction. Smith's "Golden Opportunity for American AI" blog warns that China is rapidly expanding its AI capabilities and building infrastructure in developing countries, using subsidies and strategic partnerships. But what it fails to acknowledge is that India has adopted a similar playbook, positioning itself not through organic innovation, but through foreign acquisition, talent funnels and massive foreign-backed infrastructure builds. India's track record of intellectual property misuse, reverse engineering and tech transfer through partnerships has been well-documented.
The U.S. Trade Representative has consistently placed India on its Priority Watch List, citing ongoing challenges in intellectual property enforcement and protection, highlighting in some reports issues like inadequate trade secret protection and the absence of specific civil or criminal laws addressing trade secret misappropriation in India. Indeed, in sectors like defense and aerospace, India has repeatedly used strategic partnerships to absorb, replicate and redeploy foreign technologies. These practices are not anomalies, they're part of a documented pattern.
Yet Microsoft, in its bid for global expansion, turns a blind eye, insists the U.S. must protect critical AI systems from "adversarial acquisition," while doing exactly that.
Conclusion: Act now, or America's AI future will be 'Made in India'
At a time when American workers are being laid off in record numbers and the very industries they built are slipping away, Microsoft has shown the world exactly where its loyalty lies – and it's not with the country that gave it life. Behind polished blog posts and patriotic slogans lies a calculated shift: an offshoring blueprint disguised as innovation, fueled by U.S. dollars and aligned with a foreign nation that has openly vowed to outpace the West.
This isn't just a corporate betrayal, it's a surrender of American leadership, a silent handover of the future to a geopolitical rival cloaked as an ally. Microsoft's AI empire isn't being built in Redmond, it's being constructed in Bengaluru, brick by brick, as part of India's grand strategy to dominate the global tech order by 2047.
If Americans doesn't recognize the cost of this betrayal soon, the "golden opportunity" won't belong to them. It will have already been outsourced, packaged, exported and claimed by a country that was never meant to lead Americans' future.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A black woman who "styles herself an author" has posted a social media video of her shocking rant against whites from South Africa who have been targeted for death in their own country and have been declared refugees to the United States.
"I just want to make you aware that the black people who were students during apartheid, we're grandmas and grandpas now… and we have the [air] of Gen Z, OK?" the woman states. "One more thing, I also want to let you know that our president, he has Secret Service – and you will not."
In America, she said, "black people over here are empowered."
And when they arrive they are to sit down, "don't touch nothing" and to "have the day you deserve."
The rant was posted by Diva Moore, who is described as a career coach.
The administration of President Donald Trump has fast-tracked the status of 59 Afrikaners, whites from South Africa, as refugees because their land was seized by their government without compensation.
The anti-white violence there is the result of a revolution against the minority white rule, which had existed for generations.
As a result, blacks now in charge, have decided to simply take the land belonging to whites and hand it out to blacks.
Part of the race war there now is extreme violence against whites, up to and including murder.
The Daily Mail pointed out that Moore is linked to her coaching business, where she boasts she is a "luminary in the realm of human relations" and is "the epitome of wisdom and proficiency."
The report described her comments as a "chilling threat."
It came just days after the Episcopal church in America announced it was refusing to help the white Afrikaners under a federally funded program to help migrants, through which it has accepted millions of taxpayer dollars for years.
The church said it was because the refugees are white.
Trump has explained that South Africa is running a genocide against whites, and they are being classified as refugees because they "are being killed."
On Monday, upon welcoming nearly five dozen Afrikaners to America, U.S. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce indicated: "Today, the United States sends a clear message, in alignment with the administration's America First foreign policy agenda, that America will take action to protect victims of racial discrimination. We stand with these refugees as they build a better future for themselves and their children in the United States.
"No one should have to fear having their property seized without compensation or becoming the victim of violent attacks because of their ethnicity. In the coming months, we will continue to welcome more Afrikaner refugees and help them rebuild their lives in our great country."