This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Riots exploded in Los Angeles over the weekend, and President Donald Trump ordered National Guard troops in to quell the violence.

Multiple Democrat activists and radicals immediately jumped to defend the community of migrants, including criminal illegal aliens, from the federal plan to enforce the law.

Unfair, they claimed, to bring officers against immigrants over their illegal status.

But that wasn't it at all.

Border czar Tom Homan, assigned by Trump to crack down on illegal immigrants and crime, and to close the border left wide open during Joe Biden's tenure, explained the real target was real criminals.

"It wasn't an immigration raid," Homan explained. "It was to service of three criminal warrants at locations based on a large criminal conspiracy that ICE is investigating."

He said the raids in Los Angeles were needed because of a criminal investigation into money laundering and cartel activity.

The Daily Mail described the result: "Chaos erupted after protesters clashed with immigration officials across downtown Los Angeles, leading to three days of violence. Looters targeted businesses across the city amid the demonstrations, which saw cars torched and security forces firing tear gas at rioters."

With local authorities unable or unwilling to bring things under control, and media saying it was just a bunch of people have a good time watching cars burn, the White House took action.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

For the past year, American tech workers have been told a familiar story: Artificial intelligence is replacing jobs. From boardrooms to press briefings, executives have framed workforce reductions as the inevitable result of machine learning and automation. It's the narrative that's guided mass layoffs across the industry.

But in the case of Salesforce, one of the most prominent voices in enterprise software, the facts point elsewhere.

Behind the company's public claims of AI-driven efficiency lies a more traditional and far more controversial strategy: offshoring. Between 2020 and 2024, Salesforce reduced its U.S. workforce by thousands while growing its employee base in India by more than 420%. Offices in San Francisco, Portland and other U.S. hubs were shuttered. Simultaneously, the company signed formal training and hiring agreements with the Indian government and celebrated explosive growth in Hyderabad, Mumbai and beyond.

Salesforce isn't alone in the illusion of automation. Amazon's heavily hyped "Just Walk Out" AI-powered checkout was, in truth, driven by over 1,000 workers in India manually reviewing surveillance footage. What was marketed as innovation was really offshore labor behind the scenes. Likewise, Microsoft's investment in a virtual assistant "Natasha" turned out to be 700 Indian employees posing as chatbots.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

SpaceX billionaire Elon Musk, who has been working for months now with President Donald Trump in the Department of Government Efficiency to eliminate criminal activity, fraud, waste and corruption from the government, unleashed what amounts to a nuclear bomb in his battle with Trump now.

The two have had a falling out over the congressional plan to implement some of President Trump's agenda points: cutting some spending, making tax cuts permanent and such. Musk appears to want much bigger spending cuts while Trump is faced with the reality of a Congress where he has only a slim majority in the House, and split factions among the GOP members.

Musk recently left his role as a special government employee working with DOGE, which reports having found some $170 billion in waste that has been cut.

Trump said he asked Musk to leave, and suggested cutting government contracts with Musk, such as for use of the SpaceX ships to reach space; Musk responded with a threat to decommission SpaceX ships so they would not be available for the government.

Then Musk unleashed his big shot.

"Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files," he said.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Prosecutors in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, filed charges against a pro-life family, the Knotts, for explaining their pro-life views outside an abortion business.

They kept up the case, which essentially attacked the family members for their words, for months.

Then when the trial was scheduled, they "folded" and gave up the "wrongful criminal charges entirely."

Now, on behalf of the family, the American Center for Law and Justice is fighting back with a lawsuit against the city over its First Amendment violations.

"The arrest, prosecution, and ongoing threat of future enforcement have already achieved the government's apparent goal: silencing disfavored speech," the legal team explained about the prosecution. "This case exemplifies why the ACLJ exists: to defend the constitutional rights of Americans against government overreach and discrimination. We refuse to allow local officials to use vague ordinances as weapons against unpopular speech, and we will not stand by while religious and pro-life voices are silenced through selective enforcement."

The organization pointed out, "The First Amendment doesn't guarantee freedom from annoyance or inconvenience – it guarantees freedom of speech, especially for unpopular viewpoints that challenge the status quo. When government officials start deciding which messages deserve protection based on their own preferences, we're all at risk."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The Miss America Organization and a related operation, the Miss Florida Scholarship Program, have been accused of failing to live up to an oral contract, misstating science and ignoring state law in their pro-LGBT ideology.

The dispute erupted because the organizations entered into an oral agreement with Kayleigh Bush when she won the Miss North Florida title, "where there had been no mention or public-facing materials put forth by the organization indicating they subscribed to this 'false' definition of 'female,'" then submitted a paper contract for her to sign that violates her faith and defies science and the law.

In fact, according to the science, being male or female is embedded in the human body to the DNA level, and does not change.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

An obstetrician and gynecologist has confirmed in testimony to the U.S. Senate that the figure for the miscarriage deaths following COVID-19 shots, demanded by Biden administration officials for pregnant women, "mirrors the effects of chemical abort drugs."

The stunning news of the threat from the drugs pushed by Joe Biden onto the American public during the China virus pandemic came from Dr. James Thorp, who delivered a "haunting" moment in testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs.

Thorp explained that women vaccinated during their first trimester suffered an 82% miscarriage rate.

He said, too, that the government knew what it was doing.

He cited an "infamous" Shimabukuro study from the New England Journal of Medicine that claimed a 12.6% miscarriage rate.

"But when you isolate the data for women vaccinated in the first trimester, the miscarriage rate rises to 82%, Dr. Thorp said. This 82% claim remains a topic of debate within the scientific community. If true, 'This figure mirrors the effects of chemical abort drugs,' Dr. Thorp lamented," reports confirmed.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Once again, Indian media have set their sights on an American citizen, this time a veteran who's been directly harmed by the broken H-1B system, for nothing more than exercising his First Amendment rights. The article published by M9 News, "Legal H1B Tweaks Could Shake Indian Economy,", isn't journalism; it's foreign gaslighting. The piece mocks the voice of an American patriot, Virgil Bierschwale, for daring to say what millions of displaced Americans know to be true: our immigration system is broken, rigged and ruthlessly exploited.

Nowhere in the article is there any acknowledgment of Bierschwale's service to this country, his sacrifice, or his relentless efforts to inform and empower Americans through his work and his website Guest Worker Visas, Instead, the authors trivialize his candidacy for U.S. Senate, paint him as irrelevant and attempt to silence his warnings simply because he is not a sitting politician. This is not a minor oversight. It's a deliberate omission, a calculated attempt to erase the voice of a veteran who continues to fight for his fellow citizens long after his military service.

Rather than engage with the substance of his arguments or confront the economic devastation wrought by the H-1B visa pipeline, the article reduces Bierschwale to a failed candidate, as if only the politically connected or corporate elites have the right to speak on behalf of Americans. The Indian media's message is clear: Americans should be ashamed to defend their own jobs, while foreign interests are free to demand whatever serves them, no matter the cost to the people who built this nation.

This article says more about India than it does about Virgil

"For many Indian professionals, the American dream wasn't meant to be stalled at every turn…caught in a system that seems more focused on paperwork than on people."

The ongoing narrative that the American dream is somehow being "stalled" for Indian professionals by paperwork and procedural requirements is a glaring misdirection, one that conveniently ignores the devastation the H-1B system and offshoring have inflicted on millions of Americans. The real imbalance isn't bureaucratic red tape; it's the decades-long displacement of American workers, the shuttering of careers and the hollowing out of entire industries as jobs are systematically funneled overseas or handed to foreign visa holders.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Initial injunction 'unilaterally disarms the United States' but now is on hold

In order to "avoid the irreparable national security and economic harms" being threatened by a federal appeals court ruling, the Trump administration suggested it would appeal to the Supreme Court on an emergency basis the decision overturning most of the president's tariff plans if needed.

A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of International Trade has claimed, in its permanent injunction, that the tariff plans President Donald Trump has announced for China, Mexico, Canada and many more nations aren't valid.

Trump has been using tariff policies to push foreign nations into negotiating trade deals that are fair for American businesses and consumers. Over the past, many tariff agendas have had American consumers paying more and American businesses getting less than their overseas counterparts.

The case moved immediately to an appeals court, where the lower panel's decision was stayed for now, and Department of Justice lawyer Sosun Bae said it was damaging, as being "unprecedented and legally indefensible."

He warned, in fact, it could damage or destroy many of the trade deals and negotiations already underway.

The DOJ explained, "The injunction unilaterally disarms the United States. The political branches, not courts, make foreign policy and chart economic policy."

The move is just one of dozens taken by federal courts since Trump took office for his second term in which they have taken over the decision-making process of the executive branch on issues ranging from the deportation of illegal alien criminals to economic policy to the hiring and firing of executive branch staff members.

According to a report in the Washington Examiner, the Trump administration signaled it would ask the Supreme Court to intervene on an emergency basis until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit acts immediately, which it did.

Bae warned, "The judicial coup is out of control."

Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro said in the report the court's decision reeks of "globalist" bias and he charged the judges with favoring importers.

The judges on the panel were Jane Restani, Timothy Reif and Gary Katzmann.

They claimed Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs exceeded presidential authority.

But, the report explained, "On page 35 of the decision, the judges noted that the administration would have been within its rights to impose the sweeping tariffs if it had relied on Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974."

Analysts, however, pointed out that provides only "150 days" of implementation.

Trump's goal always has been a longer term solution for the economic imbalance now embedded in the world economy.

Fox News said in a separate report that another judge ruled in favor of a Chicago company by blocking five specific orders from the president regarding tariffs on China.

It was Rudolph Contreras, the Chicago judge, who said the International Economic Emergency Economic Powers Act doesn't authorize the president to impose the tariffs involved in the dispute.

The ruling was suspended for two weeks, also to allow for an appeal.

Trump announced a long list of tariffs in April, including a baseline 10% tariff for all countries.

Rick Woldenberg is chief of Learning Resources, the company that brought the Chicago dispute. He claimed its $2.3 million tariff bill for 2024 would jump to $100.2 million in 2025.

Administrative officials have argued unelected judges do not have the authority to decide how to properly address a national emergency.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Who exactly is the person who controlled the use of Joe Biden's presidential autopen?

According to David Sacks, President Donald Trump's crypto and artificial intelligence czar, it was actually Democrat U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts who ran the electronic signature device.

"SHHH DON'T TELL JOE!" said Jesse Watters of Fox News after Sacks spilled the beans on his "Primetime" show Tuesday night.

"David Sacks just said POCAHONTAS had the AUTOPEN and wasn't afraid to use it!"

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

There have been plenty of anti-Trump performers who have chafed at the president taking an active role at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, Washington, D.C.'s premier cultural venue, including some whose opposition resulted in the cancellation of a performance of the hit musical "Hamilton."

But now a legendary Tony-winning Broadway actress is resorting to violent language, saying the facility now "should get blown up."

In a recent interview, Patti LuPone, a three-time Tony winner and two-time Grammy awardee, also said New York should secede from the Union. Lupone's remarks were reported in The New Yorker Monday.