This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A tow-truck driver apparently thought it would be "funny" to tow away a vehicle being used by federal ICE agents making arrests in Los Angeles.
It's proven about has humorous as a decade in prison.
It was Acting U.S Attorney Bill Essayli who posted about the beginning of the case against Bobby Nunez:
"How it started vs. How it's going ARRESTED: Bobby Nunez is now under arrest for brazenly towing an ICE vehicle. He is charged with theft of government property. Apparently he thought it would be funny to interfere with our immigration enforcement operations. Now he can laugh behind bars while he faces justice. Nunez is looking at up to 10 years in federal prison if convicted."
Reporter Nick Sorter explained the second chapter in the story: "BREAKING: The man who went viral for TOWING AWAY an ICE vehicle while they were making an arrest in Los Angeles has now been ARRESTED himself FAFO, loser. Bobby Nunez, who was PlSSED about his perp walk being filmed, now faces TEN YEARS in prison Nunez was tracked down by DHS via TlkTok."
At the Post Millennial was a report that explained ICE agents were detaining an illegal immigrant for DUI when Nunez went into action.
"Per Fox News' Bill Melugin, the criminal complaint signed off on by a federal judge stated that Nunez was laughing and recording ICE agents on his phone while he towed the vehicle away," the report explained.
The incident happened during the arrest of Leidy Tatiana Mafla-Martinez, a Colombian TikToker who was in the U.S. illegally, just weeks ago.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Alex Jones of Infowars erupted on air Tuesday in graphic fashion as he slammed his star reporter Owen Shroyer who is leaving the media operation over purported disputes that Shroyer had become "too anti-Trump" and "negative."
"You stabbed your brother and this operation in the back and you're a f***in' liar! F***in' a**hole, piece of sh**!" Jones said on the air.
The 36-year-old Shroyer who has been with the company since 2016 explained Monday some of his difficulties with Jones, claiming: "Alex had been coming into my show and talking about how I'm negative and calling me a pessimist and all this other stuff, which is fine."
"You work for Alex, you're gonna get hit with it a lot. Alex is not easy to work for.
"He says I'm too negative, he says I'm a pessimist, whatever, I'm too anti-Trump. So I just said, all right, you know what? I'll just take some time off, I'll just disappear. And if Alex thinks I'm too negative then maybe he's right.
"But the same issues that I had started up immediately as soon as I came back," Shroyer continued.
"And it's not to say that I didn't have creative control over the Infowars War Room.
"But I mean, imagine it's like someone staring over your back 24/7."
'I couldn't do what I wanted to do," he added.
Shroyer indicated he "walked off the show, mid-show" on Thursday because Jones had been "disrupting" the War Room show.
"I kind of just reached my point of no return," he said.
Originally, Jones wished much success for Shroyer online, stating: "I wish Owen all the best for his life and the great work he does fighting evil and promoting freedom. I never censored him and agreed with 99% of what I saw him talk about."
"As for me I am taking the high road and will continue to promote Owen when I see cool stuff he does."
Shroyer claimed he was "basically just living paycheck-to-paycheck" after not receiving a raise since 2018, which Jones refuted on the air.
"He took snake to the next level. So, Owen Shroyer's dead to me," Jones said.
But he did offer Shroyer an olive branch of sorts, saying, "If he goes on air and repents to Jesus and apologizes for being demon-possessed or whatever it is he is, then I will forgive him."
Shroyer made national headlines after his 2023 guilty plea for entering restricted grounds at the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, mayhem, for which he served 60 days in prison.
Shroyer reportedly is looking to start his own news company, World Independent News, along with a new broadcast, "The Owen Report," to debut Oct. 6, on streaming platforms such as X and Rumble.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A federal judge who previously tried to foil President Donald Trump's fight for national border security and integrity and against riots promoting illegal aliens in the country, and was reversed by an appeals court, is trying again.
It is Charles Breyer who is the judge who, when Trump ordered National Guard troops to deter anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement rioting in California, ordered Trump to stop giving orders and let leftist Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom do it.
He was overturned by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which ordered that constitutional precedents call for courts to be "highly deferential" to the president on some issues.
Breyer's latest move against Trump, according to a report from Fox News, is to claim that Trump acted unlawfully when he sent thousands of National Guard troops, and a handful of Marines, to address those anti-ICE riots that California authorities and leaders had allowed to develop.
Breyer's claim is that Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth violated the Posse Comitatus Act, which dates to the 1800s and says the military cannot ordinarily be used for domestic law enforcement.
Fox reported, "The judge said his order only applies to California, but he noted the administration's warnings about sending the National Guard to other blue cities across the country amount to 'creating a national police force with the President as its chief.'"
Breyer had made similar comments during a three-day trial last month.
At the time, he insisted, "What limiting factors are there to the use of this force?"
Trump had activated 4,000 National Guard troops in June to address support for federal authorities in California as they pursued arrests of criminal illegal aliens, over the objections of state officials including Newsom.
Most of those operations already have concluded.
Newsom screamed on social media, "LOSES AGAIN. … The courts agree — his militarization of our streets and use of the military against US citizens is ILLEGAL."
An appeal is more than probable which could result in the 9th Circuit reviewing – even overturning – Breyer again. The issue could even end up at the Supreme Court.
According to the Washington Examiner, Breyer's claim now is that the Trump administration cannot send National Guard members to protect law-enforcement officers carrying out federal law.
Breyer claimed, "There were indeed protests in Los Angeles, and some individuals engaged in violence. Yet there was no rebellion, nor was civilian law enforcement unable to respond to the protests and enforce the law."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
President Donald Trump on Monday demanded drug companies justify the success of COVID shots, saying the Centers For Disease Control is "being ripped apart over this question."
In a lengthy post on Truth Social, the president stated: "It is very important that the Drug Companies justify the success of their various Covid Drugs. Many people think they are a miracle that saved Millions of lives. Others disagree!
"With CDC being ripped apart over this question, I want the answer, and I want it NOW. I have been shown information from Pfizer, and others, that is extraordinary, but they never seem to show those results to the public. Why not???
"They go off to the next 'hunt' and let everyone rip themselves apart, including Bobby Kennedy Jr. and CDC, trying to figure out the success or failure of the Drug Companies Covid work.
"They show me GREAT numbers and results, but they don't seem to be showing them to many others. I want them to show them NOW, to CDC and the public, and clear up this MESS, one way or the other!!!
"I hope OPERATION WARP SPEED was as 'BRILLIANT' as many say it was. If not, we all want to know about it, and why??? Thank you for your attention to this very important matter!"
In 2020, during the president's first term in office, the Trump administration launched Operation Warp Speed, which accelerated testing and approval of COVID jabs as the coronavirus swept across America.
The World Health Organization indicates at least 70% of Americans have gotten both shots of the COVID-19 vaccine as of 2025, with more than 711 million doses having been administered in the U.S.
But the vaccines administered by Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, came under fierce criticism in 2021 for failing to stop breakthrough infections, as many who got the shots developed COVID-19 nonetheless.
"This development is a total game changer and is sending shock waves throughout the global establishment," Alex Jones of Infowars said Monday.
"Trump knows he was set up and knows the truth is coming out so he is getting ahead of it. Mark my words this is over the top good news!"
"The whole thing's already come down. The whole world is waking up. The majority of people know it's pure poison. Three percent even take the new, stupid boosters. So Trump understands he was set up."
"We've been all over this," Jones added. "It's the shot that kills you, the shot that erases the immune system."
Trump rarely mentions the pandemic except for praising the rapid development of COVID vaccines, which he termed a "Christmas miracle" in December 2020.
According to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll in May, only 30% of Republicans now believe the COVID shot is safe, while 55% of independents and 87% of Democrats feel that way.
Trump's secretary for Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has been grappling with health officials at the CDC after putting a stop to emergency authorization for COVID shots and changing their standards to exclude most children and healthy adults.
Susan Monarez, the CDC director, was fired Wednesday after serving less than a month in that position. The White House told the New York Times she was booted because her opinions on inoculations differed from those of Kennedy, a well-known skeptic of vaccines.
"When CDC Director Susan Monarez refused to rubber-stamp unscientific, reckless directives and fire dedicated health experts, she chose protecting the public over serving a political agenda. For that, she has been targeted," said Monarez's lawyers Abbe Lowell and Mark Zaid.
"This is not about one official. It is about the systematic dismantling of public health institutions, the silencing of experts, and the dangerous politicization of science."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Federal judges are getting better at stopping jet flights returning foreigners to their home.
This time, Judge Sparkle Sooknanan ordered jets not to take off that were part of a program by the administration of President Donald Trump to repatriate children from Guatemala to their home country, and families.
Earlier, Judge James Boasberg infamously ordered several jets carrying illegal alien criminals being deported to turn around mid-flight, without acknowledging the fact they might not have enough fuel for a return flight.
The Trump administration did not comply, as the flights already were in international airspace and Boasberg, about whom ethics complaints already have been filed, had no jurisdiction there.
This time, the judge ordered the flights not to take off, leaving some children sitting in the aircraft on the runway.
A report at RedState explained the Trump administration was sending illegal alien Guatemalan children back to their home country, after requests by Guatemala and their parents.
That wasn't good enough for Sooknanan.
She issued a temporary restraining order halting the repatriation efforts "even as kids were already sitting in their seats."
The Trump administration had hoped to reunite nearly 700 kids with parents or guardians in Guatemala.
The judge stepped into the program and shut it down after "charter buses had already rolled up to planes in Harlingen and El Paso and, in some cases, children were seated on board awaiting departure," the report said.
Drew Ensign, a lawyer for the Department of Justice, said, "These are not removals under the statute. These are repatriations. All of these children have parents or guardians in Guatemala who have requested their return."
And Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, wasn't pleased with the court's decision to deny the children to opportunity to be reunited with family.
Sooknanan claimed her order was justified because the plan to return the children was happening in the "wee hours" of a holiday weekend.
Miller said, "Cleaning up the mess that Biden made was never going to be easy—his dereliction of duty (or purposeful malfeasance) led to millions of illegal aliens flooding our borders. Now the mainstream press and the Democrats cry foul and shriek 'cruelty' at any efforts to rectify the situation, when in reality it was they themselves who created this humanitarian disaster."
It is Boasberg whose antics have prompted accusations that he is a threat to the rule of law.
The DOJ has filed a complaint warning that he is undermining the nation's judiciary.
Attorney General Pam Bondi has explained the complaint over "misconduct" by Boasberg, a federal judge who once wildly ordered the administration of President Donald Trump to turn around airplanes that already were in international airspace to return the illegal alien criminals they were deporting to America, involved his "making improper public comments about President Trump and his administration."
These comments have undermined the integrity of the judiciary," she confirmed.
A DOJ official confirmed, "Judge Boasberg first tried to persuade Chief Justice Roberts and other federal judges that the Trump administration would not follow court orders, despite having no basis for his belief. Then he acted on his baseless belief again and again in litigation over which he was presiding. Judge Boasberg violated the Canons of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, including the requirement that he 'promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.'"
Boasberg has fought the administration's agendas, including that for securing the borders and deporting illegal aliens, especially criminals, for months.
WND has reported it was the Federalist that obtained access to comments Boasberg made at a recent judicial conference undermining the president.
He disparaged the president, even though he's required to be neutral on issues and people in his court, where Trump is a defendant in a number of cases brought by activists trying to undermine his agenda for America.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche later described Boasberg as a "threat to the rule of law" for using his own agendas in his court rulings to try to control the decisions of the Executive Branch.
A report at the Washington Examiner said Blanche was responding to Boasberg's comments and said, the judge was in "serious breach of the judicial oath and a threat to the rule of law."
"This memo confirms that at least some federal judges were predisposed against the Trump administration," Blanche wrote. "Every litigant, regardless of politics, is entitled to a fair forum."
The report noted, "Other senior DOJ officials, including Chad Mizelle, called the report 'very troubling' and said it 'perhaps explains the completely lawless order issued by Judge Boasberg (which was unsurprisingly stayed by the D.C. Circuit).'"
The judge's misbehavior was revealed by the Federalist which confirmed investigative reporter and senior legal correspondent Margot Cleveland uncovered the fact that Boasberg, based in Washington, D.C., complained to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts that his colleagues were "concern[ed] that the Administration would disregard rulings of federal courts leading to a constitutional crisis."
Boasberg is the chief judge in the judicial district and has been at center of a judicial campaign to prevent Trump's agenda to secure the American borders and deport illegal aliens, those who are in the United States illegally, and often have committed subsequent crimes.
Further, Boasberg also was at the center of activism during President Trump's first term when Trump was under attack in the fabricated Russiagate conspiracy theory launched by the Hillary Clinton campaign and others with lies about Trump campaign collusion with Russia.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
An Illinois man has been arrested and accused of intentional homicide of an unborn child after he allegedly gave the abortion chemical mifepristone to his girlfriend, killing her baby, according to a report from Live Action News.
The report said it was police in Bloomington who took into custody Emerson Evans, on allegations he drugged his girlfriend without her knowledge.
"Evans had reportedly been pressuring the woman to abort the baby," the report explained, adding, "He told police he paid a different woman $50 for the pills."
Evans, 31, of Normal, Illinois, now faces counts of intentional homicide of an unborn child.
Bloomington police said in a statement emergency personnel were called to a home on August 22 for a pregnant woman having a medical emergency.
"They found the woman crying in a bathroom, surrounded by a large amount of blood. They then found the remains of her preborn baby in the toilet," the report confirmed.
Evans subsequently confirmed he wanted her to get an abortion and then said he decided to "make the decision for her" by administering the abortion drug to her without her knowledge or consent, the report said.
"We are again saddened by the alleged criminal actions which resulted in harm to others. It is my hope the mother involved in the matter fully recovers and has the resources and support of this strong community in the future," said Chief Jamal Simington.
The report noted the potential penalty for intentional homicide of an unborn child is 20-60 years in prison, and in some cases, life in prison.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Cakes are back on the menu at the Supreme Court, as a Christian baker tries to get out from under a concerted all-of-government attack on her in the state of California.
The high court already previously has ruled on the cakes from Jack Phillips, of Masterpiece Cakeshop in Colorado, scolding the state for its "hostility" to Christianity and barring the state from punishing him for rejecting demands he violate his faith by promoting the LGBT ideology with his artistry.
The arguments being made by Cathy Miller, of California, essentially are the same.
A report from Becket, which is representing Miller along with LiMandri & Jonna, and the Thomas More Society, explains Miller has asked the high court to protect her right to create custom-designed wedding cakes that reflect her faith.
The government in the state of California was weaponized against her when she told a same-sex duo that her faith did not allow her to personally promote their ideology by designing their "wedding" cake.
That was almost a decade back.
Since then, multiple agencies, courts and officials have attacked her for harming "the dignity of all Californians" with her beliefs.
Working out of her Bakersfield shop, she meets with each couple for over an hour and explains the religious and symbolic meanings of a wedding cake's components before accepting a commission.
She's developed written standards for her work, such as that she will not design custom bakery items that depict gory or pornographic images, celebrate drug use, or demean others.
Her case developed when she told a same-sex duo she could not work on their cake, but would refer them to another bakery.
Confirming the "tolerance" of the LGBT community, she was "flooded with angry social media posts, death threats, and harassing emails and phone calls," the report confirmed.
Even when a state court holding a trial ruled for her, concluding she served and employed "people of all sexual orientations" and her intent was only to follow her Christian beliefs, the state declined to admit defeat, convincing a leftist appeals court to resume attacking her.
"For eight long years, California has treated Cathy like an enemy – dragging her through court, smearing her name, and trying to force her to violate her faith," said Adèle Keim, senior counsel at Becket. "Enough is enough. We're asking the court to put a stop to this bullying campaign and let Cathy design in peace. Justice demands no less."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Two Virginia brands Mahandru Associates and its sister Startup Business Bureau sell a simple promise: set up a U.S. company, move a "manager" here on an L1 visa and figure out the rest later.
Their own pages show the sales engine behind it: referral commissions, markups allowed for middlemen, cash accepted at the office and a large trail of short-life LLCs registered at the same handful of addresses. This business model shows how easy it is to profit from selling access to live and profit in the U.S.
What they're selling, a visa wrapped in a starter company
Startup Business Bureau markets the L-1 visa as a way for executives and managers to transfer to the U.S. or open a new U.S. office. Their page lists friendly talking points: live and work in the U.S., premium processing available, dependents can come and there is a path to a green card. Mahandru hosts a brochure and an investment migration page that reads like a one stop shop, complete with a portfolio of house brands under the same umbrella.
The money path: Commissions, markups and cash at the counter
Mahandru Associates' Introducer Agreement is a marketing-and-commission contract built to sell immigration programs, specifically "Residency & Citizenship by Investment" and other business/personal migration packages, to paying clients.
The Introducer is a third-party referrer/marketer, not the law firm, whose job is to bring Mahandru paying prospects for immigration programs. The "leads" they supply are people with the money and interest to pursue Mahandru's programs, namely residency or citizenship by investment and other business/personal residency/visa packages the company sells. The introducer "registers" those prospects with Mahandru (usually by email) and gets commission when the person signs up and again if the application is completed. They're paid twice: an Introducer Fee when the client signs up and a Success Fee when the application is completed and the company is paid. The eye-catcher is a "White Label Pricing" clause that lets the introducer rebrand the offering under their own name and mark up the price ("top it up") for extra margin, meaning the person pitching the visa can hide the true provider and costs while keeping the spread.
This model bakes in conflicted incentives to push people into visa pathways whether or not they're good candidates, because commissions are triggered at sign-up, not at a successful immigration outcome. The agreement's broad confidentiality and IP language (covering client lists, applications and documents) reads like a lead-harvesting scheme, while the white-label feature can mask who's actually advising you, potentially a non-lawyer salesperson, while quietly adding markups the client never sees. In plain English, it's a pay-to-refer, upsell and rebrand system for investment-migration/visa products that can obscure pricing, blur accountability and encourage aggressive, high-pressure selling to would-be immigrants.
Both Mahandru Associates and Startup Business Bureau advertise a wide menu of payment options: they publicly list full bank account/routing numbers; they accept cash in person; they route payments via WhatsApp/email "invoices"; they steer people to bank transfers and P2P apps (Zelle/PayPal/Venmo/Cash App) and even a Gmail address, methods with weak chargeback protections; they require payments be "NET" of all bank/transfer fees and add card surcharges, nudging customers away from safer cards; and they disclaim responsibility for any payments made to "representatives," which invites side-door collections. Combined with their white-label setup, this money flow can obscure who is actually getting paid, reduce recourse for victims and make disputes or clawbacks much harder.
The support system:A formation mill behind the scenes
Public records provided show Mahandru Associates LLC acting as registered agent for dozens of LLCs clustered at a few repeat addresses. Many of these companies are short lived and many share the same mail-type addresses. That pattern looks like bulk entity formation, which pairs neatly with a "new office" visa package.
Why the loophole is so easy to sell
The L-1 "new office" rule allows a foreign company with no U.S. presence to transfer a manager here to start one. If the company shows a real relationship abroad, a leased space and a plan to grow, USCIS can approve a one-year starter. There is no annual cap and no required wage floor. At the one-year mark the company must prove the role is truly executive or managerial, not just a founder doing everything. That is where many paper offices fail. It is also where the seller has already been paid.
What Congress and auditors already warned
This is not a brand new problem. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General flagged L-1 vulnerabilities as far back as 2006, including weak checks on new offices and fuzzy "specialized knowledge" claims. Members of Congress have repeatedly voiced concerns over the potential for fraud and abuse in the L-1 program.
What the trend says
Data Source: U.S.Department of State
After FY2021, L-1 and L-2 applications surged. L-1 total applications jumped from 26,406 (FY2021) to 75,157 (FY2022) (≈+185%), peaked at 79,278 (FY2023) (≈+200%) and remained high at 74,713 (FY2024) (≈+183% over 2021). L-2 dependents followed the same arc: 31,651 → 80,366 → 85,222 → 75,248 (≈+138%–169% above 2021). The data strongly suggests that the business model is working and widespread.
Bottom line
Ultimately, the "new office" L-1 hustle turns visas into a product and the American dream into someone else's commission. When immigration is sold through white-label resellers, WhatsApp invoices and hidden markups, safeguards fail workers, families and honest businesses. Americans deserve simple, fair fixes: documented U.S. operations before approval, public disclosure of advisers and financial interests, strict firewalls between commission-driven sales and legal decisions and clean, traceable payments. Citizens and policymakers can press agencies to investigate, report deceptive pitches to the DOJ IER, DOL and USCIS and restrict government contracts for firms that game the system. The nation should reward real investment and real jobs not shell offices, middlemen and quick-flip visas.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
CBS News, which has a history of deceptively editing interviews of high-profile newsmakers, is being blasted by U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem for editing out her descriptive comments about MS-13 gang member, wife beater and child predator, Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
Noem appeared Sunday on the network's "Face the Nation," as she discussed President Donald Trump's efforts to make America safer by deporting criminals aliens including Garcia.
"I joined CBS to report the facts about Kilmar Abrego Garcia," Noem said on X.
"Instead, CBS shamefully edited the interview to whitewash the truth about this MS-13 gang member and the threat he poses to American public safety. Watch for the part of my interview that @CBS tried to cover up."
In the clip that was broadcast on the air, Noem said, "[And] the one thing that we will continue to do is make sure that [Garcia] does not walk free in the United States of America."
But the unaired portion was much more graphic of Garcia's heinous crimes, as Noem said: "This individual was a known human smuggler, MS-13 gang member, an individual who was a wife beater and someone who was so perverted that he solicited nude photos from minors and even his fellow human traffickers told him to knock it off."
"He was so sick in what he was doing and how he was treating small children. So he needs to never be in the United States of America and our administration is making sure we're doing all that we can to bring him to justice."
This is not the first time CBS has been under fire for deceptive edits, as the network was sued by Trump for its "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris in the 2024 White House race.
Trump said: "The Election Interfering 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, which aired on CBS just before Election Day and deep into Early Voting, turned out to be much worse than expected, with her answers being unlawfully fixed, manipulated, and doctored throughout by CBS, in order to try and make Kamala appear at least somewhat coherent."
Trump said CBS and its parent company Paramount have finally paid a $16 million settlement, with another $20 million on the way.
Meanwhile, Bill Belichick, the legendary NFL football coach who now at age 73 leads the North Carolina Tar Heels, also slammed the network over a "CBS Sunday Morning" interview in April in which his 24-year-old girlfriend Jordon Hudson shut down a question about how the two met.
Belichick accused CBS of selective editing "to suggest a false narrative – that Jordon was attempting to control the conversation – which is simply not true."
CBS News hit back against Belichick's claims, saying there were "no preconditions or limitations to this conversation."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Rosie O'Donnell is now apologizing for falsely claiming last week's shooter at the Catholic school in Minneapolis was a "Republican, MAGA person" and "white supremacist."
Her original video in the wake of the horror at the Annunciation Catholic Church and School that killed two children and wounded 18 others has the actress stating: "Saw about the Minnesota shooting, and it brought me right back to Columbine in 1999 when I just could not get it through my head that students in America were shooting each other in schools," she asserted on TikTok.
"This was a church inside a Catholic school. And what do you know? This was a white guy, Republican, MAGA person, what do you know? White supremacist."
Now the fierce critic of President Donald Trump is admitting she "messed up" and did not do her "due diligence."
"I know a lot of you were very upset about the video I made before I went away for a few days," O'Donnell began.
"I didn't go online and haven't seen them 'til today, but you are right. I did not do my due diligence before I made that emotional statement, and I said things about the shooter that were incorrect."
"I assumed, like most shooters, they followed a standard M.O. and had standard, you know, feelings of … you know, NRA loving kind of gun people," O'Donnell continued.
"Anyway, the truth is, I messed up, and when you mess up, you fess up. I'm sorry, this is my apology video, and I hope it's enough."
In reality, the shooter has been identified as Robert Westman, a transgender who legally changed his name to Robin Westman in 2017 with the support of his mother.
He was not a Trump-supporting MAGA person, as one of the messages on the magazine of his gun stated, "Kill Donald Trump."
O'Donnell is now living in Ireland, having fled the U.S. due to her loathing of President Trump.