This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
There's been another alleged threat against the life of President Donald Trump, who has survived two apparent assassination schemes in just the last few weeks, and a spokesman for his campaign blames it directly on the "violent rhetoric" of Kamala Harris and other extremist Democrats.
A report in the Daily Mail explains Warren Jones Crazybull, 64, of Sandpoint, Idaho, allegedly made at least nine calls to Trump's Florida residence, saying he was going to kill Trump.
The calls came July 31, just weeks after Trump was shot and injured in the ear in an assassination attempt during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
"In one call, according to a criminal complaint and affidavit first reported on Monday, Crazybull threatened to 'find Trump' and said he was 'coming down to Bedminster tomorrow,' which is the town where Trump National Golf Club is located in New Jersey," the report said.
Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung said the threats were because of the rhetoric from Harris.
In fact, Joe Biden, Harris, and a long list of other extremists in the Democrat party have for several years described Trump as a "Hitler." They've insisted he would be a dictator if he ever returned to office. They make wild claims that he would destroy "democracy" if elected. Such rhetoric is widely considered to be one of the reasons for the sudden spate of threats against and attacks on Trump.
"Kamala Harris and liberal Democrats are the ones who are deranged," Cheung said in a statement Monday. "There have been two heinous assassination attempts on President Trump, and their violent rhetoric are directly to blame."
He said Harris should "apologize for their hateful rhetoric" and to "tone down" the attacks on Trump.
Otherwise, he charged, Democrats are "explicitly advocating for and inciting more bloodshed" against Trump and Republicans who support him.
Crazybull's identity was confirmed by Secret Service through phone records and comparing the voice of the threatening calls recorded by the Mar-a-Lago security staff with a video he posted to Facebook.
The report said Crazybull was tracked, through his phone, into Montana, where he was arrested and then indicted. A trial is scheduled October 28.
He's accused, in one call, of saying, "I am going to down him personally, and kill him."
He's pleaded not guilty to the crimes.
The Secret Service was informed after the threatening calls were received.
The first assassination attempt was by the now-dead Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, who shot at Trump at the Butler rally, nicking his ear.
Then weeks later, a Secret Service agent shot at Ryan Wesley Routh, who had positioned himself, with a rifle, on a golf course where Trump was playing a round.
Routh, 58, fled and was arrested a short distance away.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Kamala Harris says that turning America in an abortion free-for-all is so important to her that she'd destroy the Senate filibuster in order to get it.
The filibuster is the longstanding practice in the chamber that requires support from at least 60 senators for a plan to advance.
Without it, a 51-49 majority could put anything into law, or in a federal court.
For instance, could a partisan like Merrick Garland, who has overseen the weaponization of the Department of Justice against President Donald Trump, ever gain the power of a Supreme Court post? Likely not with the filibuster, without it, easy.
USA Today reports Harris has confirmed she would support eliminating the filibuster "to reinstate abortion."
The report described the effort as reinstating the "abortion protections that were under Roe v. Wade," but that precedent, abandoned by the Supreme Court several years ago for not being based on the Constitution, allowed abortion at literally any time and under any circumstances.
"I think we should eliminate the filibuster for Roe," Harris during in an interview with Wisconsin Public Radio. "And get us to the point where 51 votes would be what we need to actually put back into law, the protections for reproductive freedom."
Those "protections" for "reproductive freedom" include a vast array of ways and times to kill the unborn, and according to some Democrats, even those who already have been born.
Just the News confirmed that Harris' anti-filibuster agenda has been in place since the 2022 Supreme Court Dobbs ruling confirmed that the nearly 50-year-old Roe ideology was not constitutional.
Newsweek reported a leftist commentator confirmed that Harris' comment shows "the value she puts on about codifying Roe."
In fact, for years already, Harris has insisted, regarding an abortion-at-will nation, "If the filibuster gets in the way, the Senate needs to make an exception to get this done."
One of the problems eliminating the filibuster would create, though, is that a Democrat majority of 51 could adopt anything at the time, but then be reversed immediately with a 51-vote GOP majority a year or two later, creating an atmosphere for virtually unending flip-flops in U.S. law.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Just as it has been confirmed yet another man is charged with threatening the life of President Donald Trump, tech billionaire Elon Musk has posted on his Twitter social media site a series of video statements from Democrats demanding exactly that.
"It serves as a terrifying reminder that Democrats don't just want to beat Trump, they want him gone … by any means necessary. Hey, we're not the ones saying it, THEY are. We can hear it directly from them," explained a commentary at Twitchy.
The video includes wild claims by Joe Biden about Trump being a threat to democracy.
And the threat, "They're still going to have to go and put a bullet in Donald Trump."
And twice-failed Democratic White House hopeful Hillary Clinton complaining how "dangerous" Trump is.
And an official White House statement about the "threat" Trump is.
"What's REALLY disturbing is how much of this was taken from people like Hillary Clinton even after the first or SECOND attempt on Trump's life proving they have no intention of taking the rhetoric down. Again, proving they'll do anything to anyone to stay in power," the commentary explained.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The "New York City COVID Czar" who was caught on video confessing that he held sex parties at the same time he was locking the city down now has been fired.
A report by talk show host Steven Crowder confirms that "Former NYC COVIFD Czar" Jay Varma, who formerly was a senior adviser for public health to the New York City mayor, was canned by SigaTech.
The corporation's own announcement said, "On September 23, 2024, the board of directors of SIGA Technologies (NASDAQ: SIGA) terminated Dr. Jay Varma, effective immediately, other than for cause, from his position as executive vice president and chief medical officer of the company. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Dr. Varma's service on the company's board of directors also automatically ended effective immediately."
The reasons appeared to be self-evident:
Crowder reported that Varma confirmed "New Yorkers would have been 'p—–' if they found out because he was running entire COVID response for city."
"I had to be kind of sneaky about it…I was running the entire Covid response for the city…we rented a hotel…we all took like, you know, molly[E*stasy/MDMA] … 8 to 10 of us were in a room…like just being naked with friends…"," he said on the video.
He claimed the need to "blow off steam every now and then."
Social media commenters called the action a good first step.
At Revolver was the comment: "He was the guy deciding if you could leave your house or not. And now, thanks to a glorious hidden camera confession shared by right-wing influencer Steven Crowder, we now know Dr. Varma was lying to everyone the entire time. While he was telling you to stay home and destroying kids' lives by keeping them out of school, this sick and twisted 'doctor' was partying it up at underground sex clubs, spreading his disgusting DNA everywhere."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
In a move that could signal the beginning of the end for the expensive and unreliable Biden-Harris green energy ideology, 14 of the world's biggest banks have announced they are lining up behind President Donald Trump's plans for nuclear energy in the world's future.
Online reporting cited documentation of the plans by the Financial Times:
The statement said, "Banks and funds totaling $14 TRILLION in assets have just signed an unprecedented statement in support of nuclear power. They'll be presenting the pledge to support the goal of tripling nuclear THIS MORNING at the Rockefeller Center in New York City to kick off NY Climate Week."
It continued, "A few of the names: Bank of America, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Brookfield, Citi, Credit Agricole, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Rothschild & Co. The pledge comes after Microsoft signs deal to buy $16 billion in electricity from a revived Three Mile Island nuclear plant alone over 20 years to fuel its AI ambitions."
Trump just weeks ago had chosen his agenda:
He said, "Nuclear now has become very good, very safe, and you build the smaller plants and you attach them… Nuclear is very powerful, very good."
Revolver News said, "It might be time to wave bye-bye to the Marxist 'Green New Deal' and say HELLO to nuclear power. The world's top banks have had enough of the green nightmare and are now pledging their support for nuclear energy. The Harris/Biden regime just took a direct nuclear hit to their tyrannical green agenda, and they may never recover. Actually, to get an idea of how deep this goes, BNP told the 'Financial Times' there's 'no scenario' where the world can hit carbon neutrality by 2050 without nuclear power. In addition, Barclays is also board. They believe that nuclear power could solve the problem of unreliable wind and solar energy. In other words, the global elites' green plan is an epic failure—just like many of us predicted long ago."
"This event is going to be a game-changer," George Borovas, involved in nuclear projects for the law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth, told the Financial Times. He said until now support for nuclear projects has been difficult because the senior managers would just say they don't understand it and it's controversial.
He said now banks could normalize nuclear energy as "part of the solution for climate change."
Various renewable industries, from solar panels to wind turbines, all have proven to be very expensive. Further, they cannot be considered reliable, as the sun doesn't always shine and the wind doesn't always blow.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A large part of the political world in the United States, for years already, has been the "lawfare" schemes created by Democrats and leftists.
That's the use of legal cases, with or without evidence, to attack President Trump.
They have used the campaign, unsuccessfully, to try to make sure he could not run for the White House this year.
They've included wild claims about his business operations, his comments, his post-presidential activities and more, and he's expressed confidence that ultimately he'll come out a victor, as the prosecutors, the judges and even the jurors were biased.
He has evidence to support that, as a couple of the prosecutors who created cases against him ran for office on the public proclamations that they would "get" President Trump.
Now, longtime commentator Megyn Kelly, a lawyer, has destroyed the idea that the campaign is anything but a conspiracy against Trump.
She recently was a speaker at the All-in Summit in Los Angeles, where she was a panelist for which host Jason Calacanis brought up all of Trump's "guilty" results or "convictions."
The point that he was trying to make was that the campaign against Trump couldn't be a "conspiracy" because it's come from different prosecutors, different judges, different jurisdictions.
"Calacanis not only demonstrated his ignorance of the law but also set out to condemn Trump as guilty of bogus crimes in three cases (E. Jean Carroll, the Trump Organization, and the hush money trial)," explained a report in the Gateway Pundit.
But Kelly called him out, corrected his wrong assumption that Trump was "guilty" in civil cases, and "hammered home the corruption of each case in rapid-fire fashion to a stunned host."
Kelly, who took her law degree from Albany Law School in 1995, said that the cases are "100%" conspiracy against Trump."
"(In the) E. Jean Carroll (case Democrats) changed the law so that they could bring a civil lawsuit against him. New York went 87% for Joe Biden, and that fix was in place from the start.
"The fraud trial that Letitia James brought against him has never been brought before. There are no victims. The banks involved didn't lose a penny. Nobody was complaining except Tish James, who ran for office, saying, 'I will get him.'
"Then you have Alvin Bragg, a George Soros-funded prosecutor who doesn't like to prosecute any crime in New York City except if your name is Donald Trump!
"Let's go down to Georgia. Fani Willis and Nathan Wade couldn't keep their libidos in check long enough to bring this case against Donald Trump. It's a repeat of what was happening in the case of Jan. 6 with Judge Chutkan, who loathes Trump and has sentenced almost every J6 defendant to more jail time than any of her counterparts," she said.
"Those cases are falling apart because of presidential immunity that was handed down by the Supreme Court…Those cases have been gutted. And that leaves us with Florida and the documents. And Trump has torn that apart because Jack Smith was not properly appointed and is not the right counsel…They haven't even gotten to presidential immunity there so that one is going nowhere. They're going to appeal (Smith's appointment) up to the 11th Circuit of Appeals, and it's conservative, and thank God, so is the current Supreme Court. They're not going to tolerate that nonsense."
The facts are that the leftists did change a law so E. Jean Carroll could bring an otherwise-barred civil case against Trump, at which he was found not liable for her allegation of rape, but liable for sexual abuse. His lawyers on appeal have charged besides the law change, the case "is a textbook example of implausible allegations being propped up by inflammatory, inadmissible" evidence.
James brought a business deals case in which the judge decided on his own that Trump should be liable for a judgment of hundreds of millions of dollars for practices described by witnesses under oath as ordinary business practices. The institutions the judge claimed were defrauded said they were not defrauded and wanted to do more business with Trump.
Alvin Bragg took allegations of business reporting misdemeanors and claimed they were felonies because they were in pursuit of another crime, which wasn't identified. That jury convicted Trump, but in doing so violated a legal requirement that they be unanimous all on parts of their verdict.
In the Willis-Wade fiasco, the prosecutor Fani Willis, assembled an "organized crime" case against Trump by paying her boyfriend, Wade, hundreds of thousands of tax dollars.
It's falling apart on appeal.
The case being handled by Judge Chutkan was facing all sorts of headwinds because of the Supreme Court's immunity decision.
And the last case, over government documents Trump apparently had after his presidency, revealed the absolute weaponization of the DOJ, as Joe Biden was given a pass for essentially the same offense.
Further, the prosecutor, Jack Smith, was hired by the DOJ but never was confirmed by the Senate, as required.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
President Donald Trump has warned that Kamala Harris, the candidate who got the Democrat nomination to be president without a single primary vote, would be a threat to the existence of Israel, America's key democratic ally in the Middle East.
A report in Israel365News explains his recent comments, where he said if Harris is elected, Israel would be "eradicated."
"If I don't win this election, Israel in my opinion will cease to exist within two years, and I believe I'm 100% percent right," he said. "If I do win, Israel will be safe and secure, and we will stop the toxic poison of antisemitism from spreading all over America and all over the world. But if I don't win, I believe Israel will be eradicated."
Prominent during Trump's first term in the White House were the Abraham Accords, a series of peace agreements involving Israel and several of its Arab neighbors, some of whom previously warred with Israel.
"We Jews are a purposeful people, and President Trump is [a] purposeful man," Adelson explained. "He is a true friend of the Jewish people."
The report said Adelson is an Israeli-American physician and "is the wealthiest Israeli and the 52nd richest person in the world. She is a political megadonor to the Republican Party and one of the largest supporters of Donald Trump, who awarded her the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2018."
She believes Trump should have "sweeping support" among U.S. Jews and Israelis and that Trump deserves a "Book of Trump" in the Bible due to his support for Israel.
"Our people have one more secret," she said, quoting from the Passover Haggadah to explain that people are given a promise in the Old Testament.
"And this [promise] is what has stood by our ancestors and us; for it was not only one man who rose up to destroy us: in every single generation people rise up to destroy us – but the Holy One, Blessed Be He, saves us from their hands," she said.
In fact, famed messianic rabbi Jonathan Cahn, whose books have delivered to the world stunning revelations about current events and their impact, noted the same idea.
In his new book, "The Dragon's Prophecy: Isreal, the Dark Resurrection, and the End of Days," he notes the facts of history should raise concern among those who advocate for a diminished Israel, those who would decline to side with the Middle East democracy, those who would attack and slaughter its citizens without reason or warning, those who would take the side of the attackers, and those who would do nothing.
He said the most powerful forces around the globe across the ages have tried to destroy Israel, and failed. And then they have disappeared.
"The present and most powerful of the world empires, Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, and Rome, to name just a few, all sought to eradicate the children of Israel from the face of the earth and the name of Israel from Israel," he points out. "But … The pharaohs are gone. Assyria lies in ruins. Babylon as fallen. Rome has crumbled. The Third Reich has been wiped off the earth. The Soviet Union has collapsed. All the enemies of Israel have fallen and have perished from the earth and will be no more."
He continued, "The nation of Israel lives. Because the God of Israel lives. The Savior of Israel lives. The Messiah of Israel lives. The weakest and most vulnerable have, in the end, prevailed, and have proved the strongest of peoples. The most warred-against, embattled of nations has, in the end, proved the most enduring. And the most hopeless of nations has, in the end, become the epitome of hope. The nation that once dwelt among the ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, and Babylonians is, after the passing of ages, still as young and as full of life as it has ever been. It still defies the laws of nations. It still flouts the laws of history. And it still disobeys the laws of decay and death. Why? Because He Is God brought the nation of Israel into existence to bear witness of His existence. They are because He is. They exist because He exists. And they continue to exist because He yet still exists. They would survive despite the attempts of all hell to destroy them—because more real than any other reality is the reality of God, and more powerful than any power is the power of God. That they have survived against all odds and all hell is a cause for rejoicing."
Cahn told WND in an interview that, "One of the most powerful evidences for God and encouragements for believers is Israel. God promised in Jeremiah that as long as natural order is preserved, the nation of Israel would not cease to be a nation for him."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A court has found that the public has a right to have certain information about elections and voter rolls, handing yet another defeat to a "rabidly leftist" state official in Colorado who has tried multiple times single-handedly to influence election results.
A report in the Federalist documents a federal court result, an agreement, that left Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold a loser again.
The federal court case outcome requires Griswold, a Democrat in a leftist state where the government is run, essentially, by Democrats in the governor's office, Capitol, and legislature, to release reports by the Electronic Registration Information Center that are suspected of documenting dead people on the state's voter rolls.
ERIC is a private group of leftists who handle voter registration data for states, but has been losing clients in droves because its officials demand that states keep some reports and information secret, a move which has been ruled to violate the National Voter Registration Act.
The report noted Griswold is "Colorado's rabidly leftist secretary of state who will forever be known for her anti-democratic drive to knock former President Donald Trump off the ballot."
She made that demand based on no more than her own political whims, and her wild claims that Trump is an "insurrectionist" because of the protest-turned-riot in Washington on January 6, 2021.
An insurrection, by definition, is a takedown of a government by a faction that takes over control of the nation's legislature, economy, military, foreign policy and much, much more.
The J6 events actually involved some vandalism in Washington, but the claims of insurrection were fantasy pushed by Democrats who feared Trump and wanted to use some technicality to keep him from running for president this year
The report explained Griswold's "troubling record" in Colorado includes her decision to "mistakenly" mail postcards to 30,000 foreign nationals encouraging them to vote, a violation of federal law.
The report described Griswold's work as an "election integrity fiasco."
Then came her campaign, aided and abetted by leftists in the scandal-plagued state court system, that "Trump somehow disqualified himself," a move that was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court 9-0.
That ruling essentially concluded that if Democrats were allowed to use that particular lawfare against Trump, it would open the door to other states taking similar actions against Democrats.
"Nothing in the Constitution requires that we endure such chaos," the ruling said.
The latest case against Griswold had been brought by the Public Interest Legal Foundation, and communications director Lauren Bis told the Federalist, "They talk about Trump being a threat to democracy, but you never saw him trying to force his opponents off ballots. He's not the threat. People taking unprecedented actions to have people removed from the ballot so voters can't vote for their candidate of choice, that's the real threat."
In fact, leftists like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris – and their supporters, have waged a continuous war against Trump by calling him a threat to democracy – a campaign that likely played a role in two recent failed assassination attempts against Trump.
The ERIC ruling "knocked down" the organization's "wall of secrecy in the voter list maintenance process," according to J. Christian Adams, chief of PILF.
"States cannot use third parties to hide election records that the public has a right to see."
Federal law requires that each state "shall maintain for at least 2 years and shall make available for public inspection … all records concerning the implementation of programs and activities conducted for the purpose of ensuring the accuracy and currency of official lists of eligible voters."
States used their participation in the private ERIC schemes, and its demands for secrecy, to withhold public information.
"Brimmer's order marks the third time a court has demanded ERIC disclose the records. PILF has won similar legal battles in Alaska and the District of Columbia, with each victory nullifying ERIC's secrecy agreement with member states that made them immune to public scrutiny," the report said.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
JERUSALEM – Israel's air strikes against Hezbollah positions began early Monday, as evidence increasingly mounts of a growing impatience with the situation in the north of the country, and a strong desire to pummel the Iranian proxy. However, Hezbollah appears undeterred as it attempts to strike ever-deeper into Israel.
In a second round of strikes later Monday morning, the Israel Air Force hit targets such as weapons depots which stored rockets or were used for other activities. Prior to these, Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari spoke directly to civilians in southern Lebanon and told them to evacuate these areas.
Eyewitnesses who posted on Twitter suggested initial explosions were followed up by much larger secondary ones, giving a clear indication of the kinds of weapons which were stored there. The military said it identified Hezbollah operatives preparing to carry out rocket attacks on Israel.
As the fighter jets were screaming over the northern border, Israel's Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, attended an assessment of the readiness of the home front amid widening fighting, remarking, "Ahead of us are days when the public will have to show composure, discipline, and full obedience" to instructions by the Home Front Command.
Civilians received text messages in Arabic, as well as phone calls from a local Lebanese number instructing them to remove themselves from Hezbollah-controlled areas, and long lines of cars could be seen attempting to flee northward to escape the bombing. Lebanese media reported the warning messages were also broadcast on radio stations.
"Hezbollah is lying to you and sacrificing you," IDF Arabic spokesperson Avichay Adraee said in an Arabic message to Lebanese civilians. "Its missiles and drones are more valuable and important to it than you are."
Like Hamas, Hezbollah stores missiles in civilian homes
Monday also witnessed Hagari present previously unreleased footage of Hezbollah operatives preparing to launch a cruise missile from within a civilian home in a southern Lebanon village. This building was subsequently targeted and destroyed in an airstrike.
The IDF said the missile was enabled with a payload of up to 300 kilograms of explosives and had a range of up to 200 kilometers – bringing Israel's densely populated central region well within Hezbollah's firing range.
It is important to remember, however, that while Hezbollah and Hamas do share a number of similarities, not least the Islamic Republic of Iran funding both of them, there are significant differences.
Lebanon used to be a functioning state, with an independent military, judiciary, and parliament. These still exist, although Hezbollah's tentacles have extended to all parts of Lebanese, civilian, military, and political life.
The country is also not heterogeneous; indeed, it has the largest proportion – approximately 40% – of Christians anywhere in the Middle East. Minorities include Druze, Muslims, Maronites, Armenians and Alawites. There used to be a sizable Jewish population too, although this has dwindled to a few elderly people and is thought to number fewer than 100. The point is, unlike Hamas in Gaza – and large swathes of Judea and Samaria – where there appears to be significant support, Hezbollah and its Iranian backers, are viewed as the interlopers into Lebanese society they are.
Israel and Lebanon – much like Israel and Gaza – used to have good relations. The border separating the two countries was known as the "Good Fence," a reference still in use up until Israel's withdrawal from southern Lebanon in 2000. Also, Hezbollah's support for the al-Assad regime in Syria – another client state of Iran – has similarly not endeared them to the benighted citizens of that country either.
During the later afternoon Monday, Hagari announced the IDF was planning to strike targets in the Bekaa Valley, calling again on Lebanese civilians to leave homes Hezbollah has overrun to store arms to be used against Israel.
As a post-script, it is unclear – despite the extensive bombing – whether Israel is using this tactic as a way to ensure the breakout of the Third Lebanon War, or to dissuade Hezbollah from firing its missiles even deeper than it already has into Israel. It is unlikely after nearly a year of somewhat limited responses to its provocations of missile and drone strikes against Israeli – mostly civilian targets – Hezbollah will ratchet down now.
However, Iran does not want to put one of its most valuable assets – which it has spent literally decades assembling – in significant danger. Can it pull off the trick of somehow offsetting this, without getting itself embroiled in the kind of regional war many analysts and commentators assume is going to come at some point anyway?
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A trial date has been scheduled on July 20, 2026, for a case triggered by shooting death, by a police officer, of Ashli Babbitt, one of the protesters who went to the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to protest the decision by Congress to legitimize the presidential election victory for Joe Biden.
Michael Byrd, then an officer with the U.S. Capitol Police, shot and killed her while she was inside the building.
His fatal attack came, apparently, with no warning or notice.
The group said Judge Ana C. Reyes of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia scheduled the date, and confirmed a request may be made to move the case to California, where Babbitt's family lives.
"Ashli Babbitt's family is relieved Ashli's case is moving forward to trial on all fronts," Tom Fitton, of Judicial Watch, said. "They seek justice and accountability for Ashli's violent and lawless death at the hands of U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Byrd."
The violence happened on January 6, 2021, as supporters of President Donald Trump opposed the certification of Biden's victory.
Babbitt was among members of a crowed trying to get into a U.S. House room near the actual chamber.
The case charges, "Byrd later confessed that he shot Ashli before seeing her hands or assessing her intentions or even identifying her as female. Ashli was unarmed. Her hands were up in the air, empty, and in plain view of Lt. Byrd and other officers in the lobby."
Further, it charges Byrd was not in uniform and did not identify himself as an officer.
Babbitt, 35, owned and operated a pool business with her husband, but traveled alone to Washington to attend a rally featuring President Trump at the time.
WND previously reported the judge earlier refused to dismiss the case.
Tom Fitton, of Judicial Watch, said, "Ashli Babbitt's family is thrilled the $30 million wrongful death lawsuit for her outrageous killing is moving full speed ahead."
After she was shot, the FBI opened a criminal investigation of Babbitt and at the same authorities refused to prosecute Byrd for the shooting.