This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The governor of New York has signed a measure that repeals a statutory ban on adultery in the state.

So, as legacy wire service AP documented, "Cheating on your spouse is no longer a crime…"

It was Gov. Kathy Hochul who just days ago signed a plan repealing the original 1907 law that made adultery a criminal offense, a Class B misdemeanor that carried a punishment of up to 90 days in jail.

Gov. Kathy Hochul, D-N.Y.

"These matters should clearly be handled by these individuals and not our criminal justice system. Let's take this silly, outdated statute off the books, once and for all," she said.

The Gateway Pundit documented that more than a dozen people have been charged under the statute in recent decades, but only five convicted.

State assembly member Charles Lavine proposed the repeal.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

JERUSALEM – Middle East/Israel Morning Brief

Thousands of Jews flock to Hebron to the tomb of biblical patriarchs and matriarchs

This past weekend, Jews around the world read the Torah portion of Chayei Sarah – the fifth portion of the Book of Genesis. As is customary, thousands of Jews – organizers estimated some 20,000 (which was a restricted number this year because of the security situation) flocked to the Judean town of Hebron to pay their respects to the tomb of the patriarchs and matriarchs, in particular Sarah, Abraham's wife.

CAIR forced to open to reveal funding sources after lawsuit against former employee backfires

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, will be forced to open its books and reveal its sources of funding after a defamation suit it filed against a former employee completely backfired.

U.S. Magistrate Judge David Schultz ruled Monday that CAIR's donors, funding sources – including potentially foreign ones – and any assets owned by the group are all within the "scope of permissible discovery" as part of former chapter leader Lori Saroya's lawsuit against the controversial Muslim rights group.

Northern Israeli officials, hostage families unhappy over proposed ceasefire

"A ceasefire agreement between Israel and Lebanon that does not include an arrangement to ensure the security of the communities along Israel's northern border would be a disaster," Moshe Davidovich, head of the Mateh Asher Regional Council, said on Tuesday.

"If a ceasefire agreement is signed between Lebanon and Israel and it does not include a significant arrangement to restore the security of the residents of the front-line communities before they return home — including a buffer zone near the border with a strong international force and the removal of Hezbollah beyond the Litani River — it will be a disaster for generations," he stated.

Defense Ministry advances plan to build border fence along entirety of border with Jordan

The Defense Ministry says it has begun "detailed engineering planning" to establish a fence along the entire border with Jordan to prevent infiltrations into the country — an expensive undertaking that has made little progress in the past.

Gorka: 'No such thing as Palestine'

Sebastian Gorka, Donald Trump's pick as his senior director for counter-terrorism, has made several statements in favor of Israel recently, including that "Palestine" doesn't exist and that IDF generals should forget about diplomacy and focus on defeating terrorists militarily.

U.N. fires special advisor on Prevention of Genocide for refusal to label Israel's actions in Gaza as 'genocide'

"Can anyone with integrity survive at the U.N.?" the Wall Street Journal's editorial asked on Tuesday, arguing that the U.N. was refusing to renew the contract of Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide Alice Wairimu Nderitu due to her determination that Israel's actions in Gaza could not be defined as "genocide."

Israel approves multi-billion shekel defense procurement package

Under the agreement, the Defense Ministry will purchase five advanced Reshef corvettes from Israel Shipyards to replace the aging Nirit-class corvettes, which will be taken out of service after four decades. Production of the ships in Israel will provide jobs to hundreds of workers in the north.

Iran threatens Israel with 'response beyond imagination' in retaliation for late October strike

"The Zionists have crossed the red lines of the Islamic Republic. Iran will never tolerate aggression against its territory and will not leave it unanswered," Chief of Staff of Iran's Armed Forces Mohammad Bagheri said on Tuesday.

Islamic Republic's work on pharmaceutical based agents

Multiple Iranian security complexes have been preparing production of fentanyl and medetomidine based incapacitating and lethal agents. These complexes have been working on pillars of producing those weapons: large-scale cost-efficient synthesis of the compounds with maximum potency, evaluating a stable chemical mixture based on those agents that can be aerosolized using a propellant, and developing the delivery of the agents through grenades, bullets, or drones.

Three suspected Uzbek murderers of Chabad rabbi in UAE could face death penalty

The Emirati Ministry of Interior confirmed on Monday that the three suspects arrested for the murder of Chabad-Lubavitch emissary Rabbi Zvi Kogan are Uzbek nationals.

Security authorities identified the suspects as Olimpi Toirovich, 28, Makhmudjon Abdurakhim, also 28, and Azizbek Kamlovich, 33. The ministry circulated pictures of the three men in custody.

Additionally, the ministry announced the initiation of legal proceedings against the suspects, with reports indicating the defendants could face the death penalty.

IDF soldier gravely injured in Oct. 7 battles, succumbs to his wounds

Sergeant First Class Yona Betzalel Brief, aged 23, from Modi'in-Maccabim-Re'ut, died Tuesday morning after being severely injured in combat on Oct. 7, 2023.

Brief served as a combat medic in the Duvdevan Unit, Commando Brigade, and was severely injured during combat in the communities near the Gaza Strip. He becomes the 805th IDF soldier to be killed since Oct. 7.

Israel Police thwarts huge ammo transfer to Samaria terrorists

Officers of the Israel Police's Northern District over the weekend seized a shipment of more than 20,000 bullets intended for "terrorist elements in Judea and Samaria," the police announced in a statement on Sunday.

Two residents of Ma'ale Iron, a local council that consists of five Arab Israeli villages near Megiddo, were arrested.

IDF troops reach banks of Litani river for first time since 2000>

The IDF's 91st Division has reached the Litani River in the eastern sector of southern Lebanon, as well as the Wadi Saluki area, and the military says troops located dozens of Hezbollah weapons and sites in both areas.

It is the first time since 2000 – when Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon – that IDF troops have reached the Litani River.

Israel's gov't rubber-stamps Leiter appointment as Israel's ambassador to U.S.>

Israel's government on Sunday unanimously approved the appointment of Yechiel Leiter as ambassador to the United States.

Leiter will replace Michael Herzog – the outgoing ambassador and older brother of the Israeli president – on Jan. 24, four days after the Trump administration takes office.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

"If my people, who are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." – 2 Chronicles 7:14

Americans recently found out what can happen when tens of millions of normal, decent, patriotic, God-fearing citizens fervently pray to Almighty God to have mercy on their beloved but wayward nation – and to save them from falling under the excruciating rule of deranged sociopaths obviously in the grip of very dark forces.

Indeed, most Americans understood they were close to losing, perhaps forever, the greatest and most abundantly blessed nation in history.

Here's how Christian broadcaster and bestselling author Eric Metaxas put it one day after a would-be assassin in Butler, Pennsylvania, shot Donald Trump, hitting him in the ear while missing his skull by literally half an inch – and only because Trump suddenly turned his head 90 degrees at the exact right moment:

"I have said repeatedly for months that those who hate Trump would stop at nothing to make sure he doesn't get back in to the White House, including trying to assassinate him. I have also said God's hand is on him, and would protect him, if God forbid someone did try to do that. Last night we saw that happen. His survival was nothing less than a miracle. So be assured that God is not finished with this nation.

"But we need to pray," Metaxas urged. "We are in an existential crisis, and without God, this experiment in self-government will not continue. But it is God's will that it continue. So please pray."

Today, overwhelming relief and thanksgiving for God's mercy are breathing new life and hope –even joy – into the long-suffering American middle class that delivered Donald Trump's landslide victory on Nov. 5, while rejecting the Democrats' manifestly insane agenda.

Indeed, the hard truth is that the modern Democratic Party's agenda has devolved to the point of being not merely insane – say, like its insistence that men can menstruate, get pregnant, give birth and "chest-feed" their baby. It is, in fact, increasingly criminally insane. If that sounds even slightly hyperbolic, consider that the programs pushed full-throttle by the Biden-Harris administration have included (as confirmed by recent official U.S. government statistics) intentionally allowing tens of thousands of convicted murderers and rapists to be released from foreign prisons so they can illegally enter the United States of America and wreak untold havoc on the good people of this nation. Sounds pretty criminal, doesn't it?

So it is not, as Kamala Harris liked to say, that "we have a broken immigration system." It's that the Biden-Harris regime has intentionally broken it – inviting and facilitating murder, sexual assault, terrorism, gang violence, sex-trafficking of women and children, and rampant fentanyl distribution, the No. 1 cause of death of young Americans aged 18-45.

That's not just insane. It's criminal.

Likewise, what about cutting off the breasts of 13- and 14-year-old girls and amputating the genitals of boys who have been seduced by demonically possessed social media "influencers"? Today's Democrat elite love this! Last year, would-be vice president Tim Walz signed a bill, as governor, making Minnesota a sanctuary state for transgender madness targeting children, essentially allowing the state to wrest custody of a child from his or her own parents if they didn't agree with allowing their precious child to be permanently mutilated and chemically sterilized by mad scientists.

The Harris-Walz agenda also featured abortion with no limits – literally up to the very moment of natural birth, which is de facto infanticide. And true to form, in January 2023 Walz signed into law the Protect Reproductive Options Act which stipulated no restrictions whatsoever on abortion at any stage of pregnancy – and enshrining that into the Minnesota Constitution.

Is it any wonder that the American people, who are overwhelmingly NOT interested in brainwashing their children with toxic Marxist ideologies, seeing their nation flooded with tens of thousands of murderers and rapists, killing precious human babies, cutting healthy body parts off their kids, and allowing deranged men to completely destroy women's athletics, said "HELL NO" to the Democrats' agenda and candidates in the recent presidential election?

No wonder Americans are overwhelmingly happy at the prospect of Trump and his team rapidly reversing the destructive and perverse agendas of the Biden-Harris regime.

'Morning in America'

Some much-relieved Americans are now enthusiastically calling Donald Trump the greatest American president since Ronald Reagan, evoking the famous "Morning in America" theme of Reagan's 1984 re-election campaign. And indeed, there are many striking similarities between what Reagan accomplished after the chaotic and financially ruinous Carter presidency, and what Trump accomplished after Barack Obama's toxic and divisive eight years as president.

But of all the things common to both Reagan and Trump, and there are many – their obvious love for America, their insistence on "peace through strength" via a robust military, their enlightened economic policies, their buoyant sense of humor, and the respect they both inspired in foreign leaders – one other similarity is seldom mentioned:

Democrats compared both presidents to Hitler.

That's right. As Steven F. Hayward, author of the 2001 book "The Age Of Reagan" revealed: "Liberals hated Reagan in the 1980s. Pure and simple." For example, he wrote, "Democratic Rep. William Clay of Missouri charged that Reagan was 'trying to replace the Bill of Rights with fascist precepts lifted verbatim from Mein Kampf.'"

In truth, Democrats have long been addicted to accusing Republicans of being Nazis and their leaders of being Hitler clones, but no one has been targeted nearly as much as Donald J. Trump.

Unfortunately, accusing an American president of being like Hitler is not merely dishonest and insane, it is a de facto call for his assassination, since the most moral response to the real Adolf Hitler during the Third Reich was to attempt to kill him, and the participants in all of the many plots to assassinate "Der Fuhrer" are today considered heroes.

Yet all of this present madness is understandable in light of the biblical admonition: "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!" – Isaiah 5:20

Americans of every political persuasion need to come to terms with the inescapable reality that the current Democratic Party – whose leaders have descended to defaming tens of millions of thoroughly decent, moral Americans as "fascists," "racists" and "garbage" – has become the party not just of insanity, but of evil, where good is literally called evil, and evil is called good.

Fortunately, as Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson has astutely pointed out, Trump has actually ushered in a radical realignment of the two main U.S. political parties: "The Democrats are the party of the elite now. But Donald Trump has made the Republican Party the party of the working men and women … of this nation – the people that made this country great."

That bears repeating: Whereas the Democratic Party has long been touted as the party of the working man, and the Republican Party as the political home of the rich and the elite (though not really true, that was how the GOP was long characterized), today Republicans are unquestionably the party of the common working man and woman, while the Democratic Party is widely recognized now as the political home of the elite, the wealthy, the super-rich donor class and globalists.

Winning the war

So, what must good Americans do to hold on to their victory – this precious reprieve God has so graciously granted them – and which may represent their last chance to restore America?

Yes, Nov. 5 represents a great battle decisively won. The sane and normal people are in charge again. But the larger war will continue.

After all, most of America's key institutions, from the "mainstream media" to Big Tech to academia are still almost entirely in the hands of the Left. "Drag queen story hour" brainwashing sessions targeting the nation's toddlers will still take place. Ivy League colleges will still be full of unhinged Marxist professors. And of course, the more out-of-view realms of power and influence – of big money, of the Deep State, of foreign plots, of would-be assassins and every other kind of opposition – are still out there. Media personalities will continue to snipe, defame and try to tear down the Trump administration whenever possible, and to turn Americans against it.

And yet, it won't work.

Why? Because the credibility of the "enemy within" has been destroyed; tens of millions of Americans simply do not believe them anymore. Reports of CNN preparing to fire "hundreds" of staffers and MSNBC's ratings falling more than 50% since the election testify to the reality that Americans have finally awakened to – and firmly rejected – the lies being directed at them daily by the Left.

In light of all this, it's reasonable to take a leap of faith and simply dare to affirm that America is back.

The dream of America as a land of unmatched freedom and opportunity goes back to the settlers who celebrated that first Thanksgiving just over four centuries ago in 1621, when it really sank in to all involved that this land – America – was truly their home, a blessed land of unfathomably great potential for freedom and brotherhood.

Many Americans today thought this wonderful dream might have been lost forever, that their once-great nation had just sunk too deep into the muck of corruption and delusion and evil. But thanks be to God, America is back.

Yes, the Almighty picked someone to lead the current charge – Donald Trump. But this blessing goes beyond Trump. America itself is back – as long as true Americans hold fast to it, and honor and protect it.

Highlights of "MORNING IN AMERICA" include:

* "How God blessed the USA" by David Kupelian

* "Franklin Graham compiles eye-opening list of winners in the 2024 election: 'This win is historic in many ways. Millions and millions of people were praying, and I believe God heard their prayers'" by Bob Unruh

* "'How Great Thou Art': At 3 a.m. on election night, Trump supporters celebrate 'in awesome wonder' with memorable tribute to God"

* "Trump's win: The normal people strike back. It turns out the American dream is still alive in the hearts of Americans" by Ben Shapiro

* "Our election's utter losers and winners: 'Democrats will blame everyone and everything – except themselves, who sought to drive down the American people's throat the most radical and absurd agenda of the last two centuries'" by Victor Davis Hanson

* "Who did the billionaires back for president: Trump or Harris?" by Robert Schmad

* "The Democrats' 2020 victory: A blessing in disguise. 'Most Americans now know that the Left is morally and psychologically sick'" by Dennis Prager

* "Is the Left preparing for war after Trump's victory? 'Forecasts read like paranoid fantasy, but they're carefully scripted inversions of reality'" by Lee Smith

* "The 'Garbage Saint' president: All in for the people. 'With Trumpism triumphant, many now hope for a more just world and a better future' by Hanne Nabintu Herland

* "What's behind Trump's huge gains with black men? His populist realignment of America's political parties has caused a radical shift in the electorate" by Jarrett Stepman

* "The death of Obamaism – and the historic MAGA opportunity: 'America's cultural and civilizational divide, which was reflected in this election, is … between normalcy and sanity on the one hand, and decadence and freakishness on the other hand' by Josh Hammer

* "Vivek Ramaswamy explains Trump's sweeping victory… and what it means for America's future: 'I think the revival of our national self-confidence is the most important thing Donald Trump has delivered'

* "President Trump's plan to protect children from 'left-wing gender insanity' – in his own words: 'No serious country should be telling its children that they were born with the wrong gender – a concept that was never heard of in all of human history'"

* "The Trump Doctrine: 'The most successful foreign policy of any president since Ronald Reagan'" by Ben Shapiro

* "Trump's stunning plan to dismantle the 'Deep State': Described as the 'most important 3 minutes of video on the internet'" by Bob Unruh

* "Global warming was the big election loser: 'Every poll in recent years has shown climate change ranks near the bottom of voter concerns'" by Stephen Moore

* "Here's what would happen if Democrats had their way and eliminated fossil fuels"

* "1 more post-election victory: Americans no longer believe the 'mainstream media': 'The establishment press are less trusted than virtually any major institution in American life'" by David Harsanyi

* "Trump's win 'isn't the finish line – it's the starting point': 'If the sea of red from the election is any indication, Americans are energized as never before to put this country back on the right track'" by Suzanne Bowdey.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

JERUSALEM – Israel is reportedly on the verge of signing a U.S.-brokered ceasefire agreement with Hezbollah, which could bring about a two-month pause in hostilities along the volatile Israeli-Lebanese border.

The proposed deal, still under negotiation, would involve the withdrawal of military forces from both sides and provide Israel with "significant relief" from the U.S. arms embargo currently limiting its access to critical weaponry.

Key elements of the ceasefire proposal

The ceasefire plan is a focal point for Israel's cabinet, which is set to convene to deliberate on its terms. According to White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby, the agreement is "close" to being finalized, though significant points of contention remain unresolved.

One major sticking point is Israel's insistence on retaining the right to strike Hezbollah positions in southern Lebanon, a provision that Lebanese officials have openly opposed. It's important to note the proposed ceasefire will be between Israel and Lebanon – it doesn't even mention Hezbollah.

Many people are concerned about the lack of specificity when it comes to referencing Hezbollah, which is often designated in the Orwellian language of "international speak" as a non-state actor; although it forms part of the Lebanese government, but does not constitute any part of Lebanon's army, and obviously takes no orders from it.

The Biden administration has positioned the agreement as a pathway to de-escalation while addressing Israel's concerns over Hezbollah's continued presence near the border. Reports indicate that U.S. President Joe Biden has personally assured Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that approving the ceasefire would ease the restrictions imposed by the ongoing arms embargo.

Specifically, the embargo has delayed shipments of critical munitions, including approximately 20,000 MK-84 bombs, which are instrumental in Israel's operations against terrorist targets. Given the Congress already approved these shipments, it seems surprising that despite some Executive discretion, their being held up has not garnered a more robust response..

Israeli public figures, including prominent right-wing commentator Yinon Magal, have expressed frustration over the embargo, describing it as a significant impediment to national defense. Magal noted that the deal promises to provide Israel with "armaments, missiles, shells, and weapons" necessary for its security.

Israel Defense Forces officials assess the ceasefire could serve as an opportunity to regroup, rearm, and fortify the nation's defense capabilities.It will presumably offer Hezbollah a similar opportunity to restock some of its supplies from its main benefactor Iran, as well as other state and non-state actors.

The current state of hostilities

While diplomatic efforts continue, the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah remains intense. On Monday alone, Hezbollah launched 340 missiles and drones at Israel, causing injuries to 11 people and severe damage, particularly in the northern town of Nahariya, which took at least one direct hit. In retaliation, Israel has conducted significant airstrikes in Beirut and its environs, targeting identified Hezbollah strongholds in an effort to weaken the group's infrastructure before the ceasefire potentially takes effect.

As is almost always the case when there seems to be progress on a ceasefire, both sides appear to be attempting to maximize their strategic positions ahead of a potential truce. Hezbollah's actions reflect its determination to maintain pressure on Israel, while Israeli forces aim to diminish the group's capabilities to ensure a more secure environment if and when hostilities pause.

Disputed terms and remaining challenges

One of the most contentious issues in the negotiations is Israel's demand for the right to conduct future strikes in southern Lebanon if Hezbollah violates the ceasefire. Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon has emphasized Israel must retain this ability under any agreement. Lebanon has rejected this stance, raising concerns that such provisions could undermine the ceasefire's stability and lead to its collapse.

Western diplomats involved in brokering the deal have revealed Israel seeks guarantees regarding the removal of Hezbollah's weapons from the border area. This would not only reduce the immediate threat to northern Israeli communities but also enable the return of approximately 100,000 Israelis displaced by the conflict. Without such assurances, Israeli leaders fear that Hezbollah could quickly re-establish its military infrastructure, potentially launching devastating attacks reminiscent of the Oct. 7 assault. Indeed, northern municipal and civic leaders have voiced opposition to the ceasefire due to this very fear.

Lebanon, however, is resistant to certain Israeli demands, arguing they infringe upon Lebanese sovereignty. (They did not make the same distinction when Iran's powerful proxy Hezbollah overran much of their political and civic scene). The deputy speaker of Lebanon's Parliament, Elias Bou Saab, has suggested the deal could still falter if Netanyahu alters his position or if Hezbollah seeks to pin the blame for any breakdown on Israel.

Broader implications and geopolitical factors

The ceasefire negotiations are not occurring in isolation. They are deeply intertwined with broader regional dynamics involving Syria, Russia, and the United States. Reports from Israeli media suggest Israel is pressuring the U.S. to lift some sanctions on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in exchange for his cooperation in curbing arms smuggling to Hezbollah. Such a concession could also serve to appease Russia, a key Assad ally, which has been quietly supplying weapons to Hezbollah.

Israeli forces recently uncovered a cache of advanced Russian weaponry within Lebanon, underscoring the extent of Moscow's support for Hezbollah. This trove included modern anti-tank missiles and sophisticated rockets, raising alarms about the group's growing military capabilities.

Hezbollah, now led by Naim Qassem following the elimination of its former leader Hassan Nasrallah in an Israeli airstrike in late September, has publicly demanded a "complete and comprehensive end to aggression." However, its continued attacks on Israeli territory suggest a reluctance to disengage fully without significant concessions.

The path forward

As Israel's cabinet prepares to vote on the ceasefire proposal, the outcome remains uncertain. While the deal offers the potential for short-term relief from violence and an opportunity for Israel to bolster its defenses, unresolved issues could derail the agreement. Both sides remain wary, with Israel seeking assurances that its northern border will be secure and Lebanon striving to prevent further encroachments on its sovereignty.

The Biden administration, in its final weeks, is eager to finalize the agreement as a diplomatic achievement. A State Department spokesperson has confirmed "significant progress" has been made but acknowledged "we're not there yet." The administration's efforts to mediate a resolution reflect its broader goal of stabilizing the region, even as challenges persist.

Ultimately, the ceasefire's success will hinge on the willingness of both parties to compromise and adhere to its terms. Without mutual trust and concrete enforcement mechanisms, the risk of renewed violence remains high. As fighting continues, the window for diplomacy narrows, leaving both Israel and Hezbollah with critical decisions that will shape the future of the conflict.

Putting pressure on Hamas

Some commentators and analysts have wondered whether a ceasefire – even a relatively short one of 60 days – might increase the pressure on Hamas to come to the negotiating table for a similar deal.

Israel is still embroiled in a two-front war, although more of the attention is now focused on southern Lebanon and its fight with Hezbollah. However, there is still plenty of action around Jabaliya, for example, with Hamas terrorists either being eliminated or surrendering. The IDF is also still taking casualties in this arena.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A town has been ordered by a "human rights" court to pay an LGBT activist group $10,000, including $5,000 from the mayor's personal bank account, for not celebrating the alternative lifestyle choices being promoted.

report at Not the Bee identified the town that offended the LGBT promoters as Emo, Ontario, Canada.

The report explained the LGBT members of Borderland Pride had told the city to proclaim June 2020 as "Pride Month" and fly a rainbow flag for a week.

The town council and mayor did not, however, take up the campaign.

So the organization complained to the Ontario Human Rights Council that members were injured by the town's lack of cooperation.

"The tribunal, whose rulings are legally binding, has determined that the township must pay Borderland Pride $10,000 and Emo Mayor Harold McQuaker has to provide the group with $5,000 from his personal finances," the report said.

The report continued, "Ontario's Human Rights Tribunal (an Orwellian sounding group if there ever was one) believes that LGBT people have the human right to a whole month celebrating their sex lives, and if a tiny town doesn't agree they have to pay a fine to an LGBT rights group and extort their mayor to pay half."

The LGBT activists claimed the town's action was discriminatory.

Members demanded that, "We're entitled to treatment without discrimination when we try to seek services from our local government."

Town officials also were ordered into an LGBT indoctrination course.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A plan for states to secede from the union of United States because they disagree politically with the majority is something that's been tried before.

Unsuccessfully, as the horrendous death tolls of the Civil War and its after-war punishments, like "carpet-baggers," document.

But Democrats in New York apparently believe it would produce a better result this time.

That's because they are considering a plan to become, along with several nearby states, a province of Canada over President-elect Donald Trump's coming administration.

It is the Washington Examiner that has reported that the rage from leftists is over Trump's plans to address the catastrophic results of the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris open borders agenda.

That has left millions of illegal aliens spread across the United States, taking jobs, taking government financial benefits, taking up housing and space in schools and more. Among them are criminals and terrorists.

The report said it is New York state Sen. Liz Krueger, a Democrat from New York City, who proposed withholding taxes from the federal government, or leaving entirely.

She is chairwoman of the state Senate Finance Committee and suggested the plans "as state Democrats only have weeks to counter President-elect Donald Trump before he takes office," the report said.

"It's not unreasonable to think outside of the box," she said in an interview with Politico.

Both proposals seem far-fetched. She hinted that if Trump chooses to send less federal funding to New York, a move already threatened against cities whose officials won't work with federal immigration authorities, the state should refuse to forward tax collections to the federal government.

The report noted former ICE chief Tom Homan, named as Trump's "border czar," already has committed to blocking federal funding to states that don't help with the national crisis.

"That's going to happen. I guarantee you," he has warned.

The Examiner noted, "A complete block of federal funding would leave New York $85 billion in the hole. As Krueger suggested, they could make up those funds by sending less in the hundreds of billions of tax dollars it receives."

Or, as Krueger proposed weeks ago, perhaps New York should join Canada.

She wanted to take Connecticut, Massachusetts and Vermont along.

"But that's why I thought, 'Oh, why do I have to leave this country? I love this country, and if Trump wins a second term, it's not actually my fault or people in New York.' So I thought I would suggest to Canada that instead of us all trying to illegally cross the border at night without them noticing … that they should instead agree to let us be the southeast province, a new province of Canada."

She said those states are filled with "progressive Democrats" who would fit well into Canadian ideals.

Actually, 43% of New Yorkers voted for Trump this year.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

'I would suspect that he would be removed from office. I don't know whether or not there'd be a criminal prosecution for someone resisting federal law, but he will lose'

The mayor of Denver, given the Republican sweep of the House, the Senate, and the White House, almost certainly will be losing the federal support he's enjoyed for his pro-illegal alien agenda.

And if he continues, under a White House run by pro-border security President Donald Trump, he "will lose," according to a member of the U.S. Senate.

"What he is offering is a form of insurrection," Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., explained during a television interview.

Paul said, "The mayor of Denver if he's going to resist federal law, which is a long-standing history of the supremacy of federal law, if he's going to resist that, it will go all the way to the Supreme Court.

"I would suspect that he would be removed from office. I don't know whether or not there'd be a criminal prosecution for someone resisting federal law, but he will lose. People need to realize that what he is offering is a form of insurrection where the states resist the federal government."

Paul continued, "Most people objected to that and rejected that long ago. So (I) think the mayor of Denver is on the wrong side of history, and, I think, will face legal ramifications if he doesn't obey the federal law."

WND previously reported when Denver Mayor Mike Johnston was asked about helping enforce federal immigration law.

"Not. We won't do it," Johnston said. And he elaborated, that he doubted federal forces would raid Colorado seeking illegal aliens.

"I do not believe that our governor is going to let them use our [Colorado] National Guard at the state level. Unless they were planning on bringing national guards mobilized from Texas or Alabama to come invade Colorado, I don't know where they would find the forces to begin to do that."

Johnston continued, "And that seems to me like a very, very bad idea from start to finish that no reasonable American would support."

He said not only would his administration, but the people of Denver, would resist deportation procedures by federal forces.

"More than us having (Denver police) stationed at the county line to keep them out, you would have 50,000 Denverites there. It's like the Tiananmen Square moment with the rose and the gun, right? You'd have every one of those Highland moms who came out for the migrants. And you do not want to mess with them," he said.

The Gateway Pundit wrote about Paul's comments on Face the Nation, calling it a "stern warning" to Johnston.

The senator said, "You know, I'm 100% supportive of going after the 15,000 murderers, the 13,000 sexual assault perpetrators, rapists—let's send them on their way to prison or back home to another prison."

He did say that the better way to handle the problem created by the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris agenda of open borders is to use judges, warrants, and such.

"So, I'm for removing these people, but through the normal process of domestic policing."

The publication earlier had described how Johnston wanted Denver to be a "fortress of resistance," with moves such as running Denver as a "sanctuary" city. He even suggested civil disobedience to block border security plans and deportation efforts.

Johnston later claimed his choice of words was poor.

Asked about civil disobedience, he said, "If I believe that our residents are having their rights violated, if I think things are happening that are illegal or immoral or un-American in our city, I would certainly protest it, and I would expect other residents would do the same."

Denver Channel 9's Marc Sallinger asked, "Trump's new border czar, Tom Homan, has said that he is willing to arrest leaders like yourself for standing in the way of these policies they want to enact. Would you be willing to go to jail for these things?"

Johnston said, "Yeah, I'm not afraid of that. I'm also not seeking that. I think the goal is we want to be able to negotiate with reasonable people on how to solve hard problems."

Earlier, it was lawyer Mike Davis, who formerly worked for the Senate Judiciary Committee and clerked for Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, who pointed out Johnston's plans could make him liable for allegations of conspiracy, obstruction, and even assault on federal officers.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

JERUSALEM – The prospect of a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon is generating intense discussions across diplomatic, political, and military channels.

Reports suggest significant progress has been made in the negotiations, spearheaded by U.S. envoy Amos Hochstein. However, the situation is fraught with challenges, as various actors within the continuing drama express conflicting priorities.

Ceasefire negotiations

Recent reports indicate Israel has agreed in principle to a U.S.-mediated ceasefire proposal. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened high-level consultations with defense and political leaders to evaluate the terms on Sunday night. Preliminary approval for the agreement has reportedly been conveyed to Lebanese officials via Hochstein, though several key issues remain unresolved​.

The proposal seeks to establish a cessation of hostilities – for at least 60 days – while addressing concerns from both sides. Lebanese authorities have emphasized the need for a swift withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon.

Simultaneously, Israel aims to ensure Hezbollah is significantly weakened and unable to resume its military activities​, particularly the indiscriminate firing of rockets and launching of drones over the border. On Sunday alone, Hezbollah fired at least 350 projectiles into Israeli territory, some of them setting off incoming missile alerts across large swaths of the heavily-populated center of the country.

Domestic political reactions in Israel

The ceasefire discussions have triggered sharp criticism within Israel's political landscape. National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called the potential agreement a "big mistake," arguing that it represents "an historic missed opportunity to decisively defeat Hezbollah."

He insists that Israel should continue its military campaign until Hezbollah's operational capacity is entirely neutralized​. While there is certainly war fatigue in Israel, there are still tens of thousands of residents of the country's north who cannot return to their homes – and previous lives – for fear of Hezbollah attacks.

This perspective highlights the broader debate within Israel over balancing military objectives with humanitarian and diplomatic considerations. Critics of the ceasefire argue that halting the offensive now could leave Hezbollah intact and embolden the group in future conflicts – which will almost inevitably come – and likely sooner than the 17 years it took since the previous round.

They argue a ceasefire will allow the Iranian-backed terrorist proxy to resupply and also reorganize after a brutal few weeks in which the entirety of its senior leadership, including long-standing general secretary Hassan Nasrallah were eliminated in IDF strikes. Supporters of the ceasefire, meanwhile, point to the need to prevent further loss of life and avoid prolonged warfare, because of the very fatigue which has set in.

The role of the United States

The U.S. has played a central role in mediating the potential ceasefire. Hochstein has held extensive talks with Israeli and Lebanese officials, offering American guarantees to facilitate an agreement. These guarantees likely include mechanisms to monitor compliance and address violations by either side​.

However, it could be these upon which there are significant sticking points. Israel and Israelis have gotten to a point where international agreements regarding peacekeeping forces – especially the United Nations International Force in Lebanon, or UNIFIL – have shown themselves to be almost completely useless. Worse, some of those forces supposed to keep the sides apart have, in fact, facilitated Hezbollah's offensive actions.

The timing of the U.S. push for a ceasefire appears strategic, with Washington keen to attempt to stabilize the region and shift focus to broader geopolitical priorities, including the Ukraine-Russia arena. However, some analysts suggest that American pressure could exacerbate tensions within Israel's political system, particularly if key leaders perceive the agreement as compromising Israel's security interests, which given the Biden administration's dislike of Netanyahu and his government might be viewed as a hoped-for by-product.

Challenges and contradictions

Despite progress in negotiations, significant hurdles remain. Lebanese sources have described a dual reality where talks are advancing on one hand but face substantial obstacles on the other. Among the primary challenges is the lingering distrust between the parties. Lebanese President Najib Mikati has condemned recent Israeli strikes on Lebanese army positions, framing them as a rejection of dialogue efforts​

Another contentious issue involves the terms of Hezbollah's demilitarization and whether any ceasefire can effectively enforce restrictions on its activities.

For Israel, ensuring that Hezbollah cannot rebuild its arsenal or launch future attacks is a non-negotiable priority. For Lebanon, maintaining sovereignty and avoiding a political backlash from Hezbollah supporters are equally critical concerns.

Several Lebanese X users took to the platform to effectively beg Israel to keep fighting, arguing Hezbollah would not keep up its end of the bargain and the fact there'd almost inevitably be further hostilities sometime in the near future.

Potential outcomes

If a ceasefire is finalized, it could pave the way for broader de-escalation in the region. However, the agreement's success would depend on robust enforcement mechanisms and sustained international engagement. Failure to address underlying grievances and power dynamics could lead to a temporary lull in violence, followed by renewed conflict.

The discussions also have significant implications for regional stability. A ceasefire would alleviate humanitarian crises in Lebanon and Israel's northern communities, but it could also shift focus to the unresolved tensions in Gaza and Judea and Samaria, where hostilities continue. Iran's nefarious influence in the region – which would obviously be out of the purview of any ceasefire agreement.

The context of conflict

Hostilities along the Israeli-Lebanese border have escalated sharply since Oct. 8, 2023, when entirely unprovoked, Hezbollah joined the conflict in support of Hamas, which had launched its murderous assault of southern Israeli communities a day earlier. The violence has reportedly led to thousands of casualties in Lebanon, widespread displacement, and significant destruction, particularly in southern Lebanon and Beirut's suburbs – which are Hezbollah strongholds.

The IDF has lost more than 70 soldiers since it began its ground incursion nearly two months ago. In addition, more than 40 civilians have lost their lives in Hezbollah missile attacks, including a group of 12 Druze children in one fatal incident toward the end of July.

The Israeli Defense Forces have intensified their operations in Lebanon to neutralize Hezbollah's military infrastructure, including rocket launch sites. Hezbollah, in turn, has launched sustained rocket fire into northern Israel, causing casualties and damage​. Amid this backdrop, diplomatic efforts for a ceasefire have gained momentum.

The possibility of a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah represents a critical juncture in the ongoing conflict. While there is cautious optimism, the path to peace remains fraught with challenges. Balancing the immediate need to end hostilities with long-term security and political considerations will be central to determining whether the ceasefire can achieve lasting stability.

Both Israel and Lebanon face difficult decisions in the coming days. For Israel, the challenge lies in convincing domestic audiences that the agreement does not compromise national security. For Lebanon, navigating Hezbollah's influence and public sentiment will be equally complex. The role of external actors, particularly the United States, will be pivotal in bridging these divides and ensuring that the ceasefire has a meaningful and durable impact.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey says a court ruling that leaves in place a state law banning child mutilation is a "resounding victory" for children.

"We are the first state in the nation to successfully defend such a law at the trial court level. I'm extremely proud of the thousands of hours my office put in to shine a light on the lack of evidence supporting these irreversible procedures. We will never stop fighting to ensure Missouri is the safest state in the nation for children," he explained.

The comment followed a decision by the Cole County Circuit Court in Noe v. Parson, a dispute over transgenderism, that affirmed a state law protecting children from "harmful, unnecessary, and high-risk transition drugs and surgeries."

The ADF worked along with AG's office to defend the law, and ADF lawyer Hal Frampton said, "Missouri rightly enacted a law that protects the health and welfare of all children—supporting their natural biological development and ensuring that children experiencing gender dysphoria have support and medical care rooted in biology and science."

He pointed out, "Driven by ideological agendas, activists and the Biden-Harris administration have pushed these dangerous procedures across the country and are attempting to prevent states from exercising their rightful role to regulate the medical profession and protect kids."

He pointed out that around the world, nations that used to promote the ideology, now are backing away.

A report from a broadcaster, KCUR, explained the ruling was from Craig Carter, a Wright County judge serving in Cole County.

A ruling, 74 pages, agreed with the state arguments against what LGBT promoters called "gender-affirming care."

The report said the state's lawmakers in 2023 agreed to limit the use of cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers and undergo gender transition surgeries, which end up mutilating juvenile bodies and often leaving them sterile for life.

The law also blocks the state from paying for such radical actions for adults through the state Medicaid program.

The report said the ruling noted the U.S. Supreme Court allows lawmakers broad discretion in areas "fraught with medical and scientific uncertainty."

And the judge pointed out there is "an almost total lack of consensus as to the medical ethics of adolescent gender dysphoria treatment."

The judge said the medical profession "stands in the middle of an ethical minefield, with scant evidence to lead it out."

The judge also confirmed there are "concerns with deferring to the organizations relied on by plaintiffs, such as WPATH, which self-describes itself as an organization 'committed to advocacy.'"

That is the World Professional Association for Transgender Health which promotes LGBT ideologies worldwide.

The report noted the judge said, "If we don't let a 16-year-old buy a six pack of beer and a pack of smokes, or let an adult buy those items for them, should we allow the same kid/parent team to decide to change a teenager's sex forever?"

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

In France, part of the so-called civilized West, human rights and freedom have been protected for generations, but that nation has exited that group.

Because it now has censored speech to the point it is illegal to say that abortion, which causes the death of the unborn every single time the process fulfills its goal, is a "cause of death."

The analysis comes from free speech expert Jonathan Turley, who is a constitutional expert who has testified before Congress and represented members, on related issues.

He's also released a new book, "The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage."

He points out that for generations, France's call to patriotism has been "liberté, égalité, fraternité," or Liberty, Equality and Fraternity.

"However, in today's France, 'liberté' is no longer valued. Individual rights of religion and speech are routinely sacrificed in the name of 'equity' and 'fraternity," he warned.

"We have long discussed the collapse of free speech values in France as the left criminalizes an ever-widening scope of opposing viewpoints," he explained. "Conservative groups are denouncing a new such case targeting conservative media. CNEWS was fined and forced to apologize on air after a journalist referred to abortion as the world's leading cause of death."

He explained a presenter on CNEWS., which is owned by Catholic businessman Vincent Bolloré, recently broadcast a graphic on the causes of death that put abortion on top, with 73 million deaths worldwide each year.

Cancer was ranked second at 10 million and smoking followed at 6.2 million.

Turley pointed out that Arcom, the French media regulators, immediately "imposed a fine of 100,000 euros and compelled CNEWS to apologize on the air. It was the full monty of censorship, combining a penalty with compelled speech. Arcom found that the network had failed its 'obligation of honesty and rigor in the presentation and processing of information.' It declared that 'Abortion cannot be presented as a cause of death.'"

That, Turley noted, is despite the obvious, that "many people around the world view abortion as the death of a human being."

But leftists "went ballistic," and now in France "It is now a violation of law to call abortion a cause of death."

Turley said the attitude of banning the truth wasn't surprising.

"France has been a leader in the rollback on free speech in the West with ever-widening laws curtailing free speech. These laws criminalize speech under vague standards referring to 'inciting' or 'intimidating' others based on race or religion," he said.

He cited the case of the father of French conservative presidential candidate Marine Le Pen who was fined because he had called people from the Roma minority "smelly" and the charge against a teenager who said Islam was a "religion of hate."

Turley said free speech is in a free fall across Europe.

"The desire to silence others has now become an insatiable appetite," he said.

Patriot News Alerts delivers timely news and analysis on U.S. politics, government, and current events, helping readers stay informed with clear reporting and principled commentary.
© 2026 - Patriot News Alerts