This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The Indian media is celebrating Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to the U.S. as a landmark moment in international relations, trade, and technological collaboration. Yet, behind the diplomatic pleasantries and ambitious promises, there are profound implications that should concern every American worker. While the official narrative describes a mutually beneficial partnership, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), a powerful lobbying group with deep ties to India's government, is revealing a different reality, one where the biggest winner is India, while the American workforce is left to bear the consequences.
CII is not merely applauding this agreement; they are declaring victory. They have openly stated that this partnership will boost India's manufacturing, attract foreign direct investment, and create jobs, in India. Missing from their extensive coverage of this visit is any substantial mention of job creation for American workers or a commitment to strengthening U.S. industry or really any benefits for America. This omission is not accidental. It is a clear indication of what this deal is truly about, cementing India's rise as a global technology and economic powerhouse, financed in part by the American taxpayer.
As I have learned through CII's many articles and reports, this was not a sudden shift in U.S.-India relations, but rather a well-coordinated and orchestrated effort spanning over two decades, and now, it appears to be paying off exactly as intended.
For years, CII has meticulously positioned India as the ideal destination for U.S. investment, offshoring, and technology partnerships, using a strategic combination of corporate influence, policy lobbying, and diaspora leverage to embed itself deep within American economic and political systems. Every report, every initiative, and every policy recommendation they have put forward has been part of a long-term playbook designed to transform India into the dominant global leader in technology, manufacturing, and trade, with U.S. wealth, jobs, and innovation fueling that rise.
This latest agreement is not just another trade deal, it is the culmination of years of calculated maneuvering that has led to India's growing dominance in critical sectors like AI, semiconductors, cybersecurity, and defense technology. While American workers have endured waves of job losses, mass layoffs, and declining wages, India has steadily positioned itself as the primary beneficiary of U.S. corporate outsourcing, workforce displacement, and technology transfers.
This is not a coincidence. This is the result of a carefully executed strategy, one that CII and its network of industry insiders have worked toward for decades. And now, with this latest agreement, they are reaping the rewards of their efforts while Americans pay the price.
For years, Americans have been told that China is the greatest threat to our jobs, industries, and technological leadership. While Washington remains fixated on Beijing, India has methodically positioned itself as the next major global competitor, using strategic partnerships, outsourcing, and workforce displacement to advance its own economic agenda. The difference is that while China's rise has been met with bipartisan scrutiny, India's expansion has been largely facilitated by U.S. policy, American investment, and corporate influence.
A Closer Look at the U.S.-India Tech Agreement, Who Really Benefits?
This deal is being framed as a step toward strengthening America's technological and economic security, but the details suggest otherwise. The U.S.-India COMPACT framework and TRUST initiative focus on key industries, AI, semiconductors, cybersecurity, quantum computing, and defense technology, that are not just critical to economic growth, but to national security. The question that must be asked is why the U.S. is actively helping India expand its capabilities in these fields, rather than prioritizing investment in the American workforce.
The CHIPS Act passed to revitalize semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S., was designed to secure supply chains and reduce dependence on foreign production. Yet, this agreement simultaneously provides India with the means to expand its own semiconductor industry, positioning it as a direct competitor to American manufacturing. If the goal is to strengthen America's independence in semiconductor production, why are we simultaneously bolstering another country's ability to dominate the same industry?
The agreement also paves the way for increased AI and cybersecurity collaboration, with initiatives such as the Autonomous Systems Industry Alliance (ASIA) and INDUS-X defense collaboration. These programs will train and develop India's tech workforce with U.S. expertise, resources, and funding, ensuring that India's position in the global AI and defense technology sector continues to grow. This is not a theoretical concern, India has openly stated its ambition to lead in AI, semiconductors, quantum computing, and telecommunications. With American investments and training, that ambition is quickly becoming a reality.
The Impact on American Workers, More Offshoring, More Displacement
One of the most glaring concerns is what this agreement means for American jobs. The U.S. has already experienced the devastating effects of offshoring and workforce displacement through trade deals that prioritized foreign labor markets over domestic employment. This deal sets the stage for even greater job losses, particularly in technology, engineering, manufacturing, and cybersecurity.
The H-1B visa program has already led to the widespread replacement of American tech workers with lower-wage foreign labor, primarily from India, the same country where our jobs, technology, and intellectual property are being aggressively offshored.
Major corporations like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have been at the forefront of lobbying for more visas, enabling them to flood their U.S. workforce with Indian nationals while simultaneously cutting American jobs. At the same time, these companies are rapidly expanding their operations in India, investing billions into new tech hubs, engineering centers, and AI research labs, all while scaling back hiring in the United States.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
In response to a letter from U.S. President Donald Trump, Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei stated: "Some people inside the country keep bringing up the issue of negotiations, asking, 'Why don't you negotiate with the U.S.?' I want to be clear: If the goal of negotiations is to lift sanctions, that will not happen. Instead, it will only tighten the noose and increase the pressure."
That was March 12. Two days later, former President Hassan Rouhani, who served two terms between 2013 to 2021, responded to Khamenei's remarks, warning: "The situation is extremely critical, and the more we move forward, the harder and worse it becomes."
Rouhani further emphasized that negotiations should not be seen as a personal stance of Khamenei, stating: "We argue over whether to negotiate or not. But what kind of debate is this? Then we attach it to the idea that the supreme leader opposes negotiations. The truth is, that the supreme leader is not fundamentally against negotiations. Under current conditions, he may reject them today, but in a few months, given new circumstances, he might support them."
Seeing negotiation as a way out, Hassan Rouhani is deeply concerned about the rising tide of public anger. Four decades of clerical rule have left a nation simmering with frustration – anger that, like a ticking time bomb, threatens to detonate beneath the regime.
Khamenei is more aware than anyone of the existential threats facing his rule. He knows economic collapse and widespread hunger – now affecting more than two-thirds of Iran's population – have pushed the country to the brink of a massive uprising. He also understands that this time, the regime is up against more than just spontaneous protests. Thousands of resistance units across Iran are waiting for the right spark to ignite a nationwide rebellion, one that would drive the regime toward its downfall.
For the past decade, these units – established by the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran, or MEK, the regime's sworn enemy – have spread into every neighborhood, town, and city. Despite the regime's extensive surveillance networks and security forces, the opposition has managed to carry out 60 anti-repression operations across Iran in March alone, relying on their deep social base.
Khamenei is also fully aware that this time, the international community – particularly Europe and the U.S. – stands united in its efforts to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions and regional influence.
In their latest statement, G7 members declared: "Iran is the primary source of instability in the region and must never be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. Iran must change course, de-escalate tensions, and choose diplomacy."
The recent U.S. attack on the Houthis at Trump's direction was another strong warning to Khamenei intended to bring him to the negotiating table.
Khamenei knows negotiations will inevitably force him into a step-by-step retreat. First, he will have to abandon Iran's nuclear program. From there, his authority will begin to erode, like a crumbling, decaying structure. This collapse will only deepen the rifts within the regime, pitting rival factions against each other in an all-out power struggle. Under such conditions, and due to the presence of major organized resistance within Iran, Ali Khamenei prefers to avoid negotiations, even at the cost of potential attacks on his nuclear facilities. The fall of Khamenei's rule is no longer a possibility – many see it as a foregone conclusion.
In a nation that has endured 45 years of repression and bloodshed at the hands of violent, dictatorial religious fanatics, tensions have reached a breaking point. Iran today is a powder keg, and Ali Khamenei's authority – already weakened by internal dissent following Syria's collapse – hangs by a thread. Once it unravels, the "wolves" within the regime will turn on one another. And when that moment of weakness arrives, the final uprising will not just be possible. It will be inevitable.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A tax-writing member of Congress has recommended that the Internal Revenue Service revoke the tax-exempt status of a nonprofit linked to failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, an election denier who long after the votes were counted still claimed she won.
A report at Fox News noted the organization founded by Abrams, New Georgia Project, recently was fined $300,000 for violating state election laws, as determined by the Georgia Ethics Commission.
Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., and the chief of the House Ways & Means Committee, described the punishment as "the largest penalty in the Ethics Commission's history and possibly the largest ethics fine ever issued in the United States."
His comments, the report said, came in a letter to IRS Commissioner Melanie Krause.
At issue in the case was the organization's failure to reveal some $4 million in campaign contributions and more than $3 million spending during the time it backed Abrams' failed 2018 run for governor.
"As you know, under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), organizations are strictly prohibited from participating in or intervening in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office," the member of Congress explained. "The IRS may revoke an organization's tax-exempt status or assess excise taxes for certain types of violations if it determines the organization is noncompliant as it relates to political campaign intervention."
Abrams started the group in 2013 and apparently left sometime in 2017.
A New Georgia Project affiliated group, the New Georgia Project Action Fund, accepts donations that are not tax-exempt, and it is allowed to endorse.
Smith charged, 'The New Georgia Project's intervention in the 2018 election cycle in support of Stacey Abrams and other candidates' campaigns amounts to a clear violation of their tax-exempt status."
He said that's cause for the group to lose the privilege of being tax-exempt.
He said, "it is clear that the New Georgia Project crossed the line into prohibited activity by intervening in the 2018 election cycle on behalf of Stacey Abrams and several other candidates."
It's not only the controversy that has been linked to Abrams recently.
WND reported when it was revealed she was behind one of the more egregious spending schemes that happened with tax money during Joe Biden's administration.
In her program, taxpayers bought new appliances for residents of a Georgia town so their energy bills would do down.
In an MSNBC interview, she said, the "program" was to lower costs for residents of De Soto, Georgia.
It was in 2023 and 2024, she said, "We worked in a tiny town in south Georgia to demonstrate that by replacing energy inefficient appliances with efficient appliances you can lower your costs," she said.
That's what happened when EPA-controlled tax funding went to that enterprise, she said. One woman's electricity bill was halved to $98 because she was given new appliances, by taxpayers.
The EPA then said such a program should be expanded.
Added another, "This is a ridiculous theft! Of course new appliances are more energy efficient! My household saved money for new washer, dryer, refrigerator, and our energy bills WERE less. BUT…the EPA has no business 'giving' my tax $ to others for this purchase. She needs be prosecuted."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A federal judge says he won't allow President Donald Trump to protect Americans by removing illegal alien criminals from America's shores by using existing federal law, the Alien Enemies Act, in a move that solidifies the perception that he wants to control America's international policies.
Reports confirmed that James Boasberg, a judge in Washington, Monday denied the Trump administration's move to lift a temporary block on deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members.
Boasberg insists that illegal aliens have the American right to challenge whether they qualify.
Boasberg, who has his position thanks to Barack Obama, said the Constitution's due process requirements apply to foreign criminals.
The Trump administration had confirmed that it had reviewed the records and history of the Venezuelans deported and confirmed that were members of the transnational gang Tren de Aragua, which has been identified by U.S. authorities as a terrorist group.
The White House announced earlier this month it was using the existing federal law, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, to remove gang members.
Ultimately, several hundred were flown to El Salvador even though Boasberg had ordered the planes, already in flight in international space, to return the gang members to America.
That case is on appeal, and White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt promised the fight will continue.
As WorldNetDaily reported Sunday, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said this is the case of "an out-of-control judge, a federal judge trying to control our entire foreign policy and he cannot do it. You know, he dragged us into court on a Saturday without any notice and he's continuing these hearings … He's trying to ask us about national security information which he absolutely is not entitled to."
She said the Trump administration is appealing and will win.
She said, "They're not immigrants," but are "Illegal aliens committing the most violent crimes on Americans."
Fox News reported it also appears like Trump will be getting backing from Congress.
"The House Judiciary Committee is expected to hold a hearing early next week looking into the issue of 'activist judges,' three people familiar with discussions told Fox News Digital. It comes as the Trump administration has faced more than a dozen injunctions from various district court judges across the country on a range of policy decisions," the report said.
The issues include illegal aliens crossing into the United States, the wild and anti-science agenda of transgenderism and such in federal programs, the Trump administration's effort to eliminate fraud, waste, and corruption from the government and many more.
Local judges have taken over the presidential decision-making by issuing a wild array of injunctions for the entire nation, something that Congress is reviewing.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
When President Donald Trump took office, his plans for his executive branch Department of Government Efficiency already were well-known. X owner Elon Musk promptly was given directions, as a special employee in the executive branch, to find waste, fraud, and corruption in the federal government's spending, and to cut it out.
So far the department has worked in dozens of federal offices, from the Internal Revenue Service to Voice of America, proposed slashing tens of thousands of dollars, and tens of billions of dollars in spending.
The backlash is as was expected: Leftists who created those spending channels, who like them, or possibly even benefit from them, have gone with lawsuits against Trump's work to make America fiscally responsible again to their favorite left-leaning judges, who promptly have delivered to their causes injunctions against Trump.
They've ordered him to rehire thousands of workers who were dismissed because their jobs were not part of the legally required operations of their agencies, they've ordered billions of dollars to be spent and be lost forever, they've ordered illegal alien criminals to be brought back to the United States.
Now there's a response to that problem: A new Department of Legal Accountability, DOLA, that would require legal accountability in America's justice system that for years was weaponized by Democrats against Republicans, conservatives, Christians, and even those who just viewed the government from a perspective other than huge programs and spending.
The announcement comes from lawyer Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch.
He's noted for earlier founding Judicial Watch. He also was on the legal team that broke up the AT&T monopoly. He is a former U.S. Senate candidate.
His status rose so high that a television show even created a character in his likeness (Larry Klaypool).
He told WND the DOLA program for right now is under the umbrella of Freedom Watch.
But that may not necessarily remain that way.
"It is time that We the People rise up and take action to reform and enforce an honest legal system that is not weaponized and which represents all Americans, not only the left. DOLA is designed to work closely with the Trump Department of Justice and all entities that believe in the rule of law and the Constitution," he said. "Stay tuned for more particulars, but the time has come for Americans to assert the legitimate rights of the citizenry and to clean up a compromised legal profession comprised of partisan and dishonest prosecutors and federal judges in particular."
During the Joe Biden regime, the DOJ was weaponized to bring multiple lawfare cases against Trump, even coordinating with state prosecutors to bring additional state claims against him.
Those ultimately died when he was elected president again.
Klayman explained he and other conservatives who believe in the vision of the Founding Fathers are working on DOLA.
His announcement explained, "In addition to prominent public interest attorneys such as Klayman, a trial lawyer of many decades, and the only lawyer ever to have a court rule that a sitting president committed a crime, which occurred during the Clinton administration, constitutional scholars and friends of Freedom Watch, such as former presidential candidate and U.N. Ambassador Alan Keyes who served under the Reagan administration, are being recruited by Freedom Watch for this crucial endeavor."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
First it was conservative giants Donald Trump Jr. and Charlie Kirk who visited Greenland, and now Second Lady Usha Vance is headed to the region President Donald Trump wishes to acquire for the United States.
Usha Vance, the wife of Vice President JD Vance, will travel on Thursday to Greenland with her son and an American delegation for a three-day visit.
The White House said on Sunday: "On Thursday, March 27, 2025, Second Lady Usha Vance will travel to Greenland with her son and a United States delegation to visit historical sites, learn about Greenlandic heritage, and attend the Avannaata Qimussersu, Greenland's national dogsled race.
"The race brings together approximately 37 mushers and 444 dogs in a remarkable display of speed, skill, and teamwork. Ms. Vance and the delegation are excited to witness this monumental race and celebrate Greenlandic culture and unity."
The delegation is set to return to America on Saturday.
Before President Trump was sworn in for his second term on Jan. 20, his son Don Jr. and Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA landed in Greenland on Jan. 7 to express America's interest in the Danish territory.
"Don Jr. and my Reps landing in Greenland," the president-elect posted on Truth Social.
"The reception has been great. They, and the Free World, need safety, security, strength, and PEACE!
"This is a deal that must happen. MAGA. MAKE GREENLAND GREAT AGAIN!"
Elon Musk noted: "If the people of Greenland want to be part of America, which I hope they do, they would be most welcome!"
President Donald Trump also posted a video of a man from Greenland urging the U.S. to purchase the massive territory from Denmark.
"Buy us! Buy Greenland!" the man says as he puts on a red, Make America Great Again cap.
Trump attached his own message to the video clip, indicating: "I am hearing that the people of Greenland are 'MAGA.'
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Hello, this is Victor Davis Hanson for The Daily Signal. I want to apologize to you.
I have been writing columns and have suggested to you in these videos that the Democrats didn't have an agenda. In other words, they were just nihilists. But I went back and looked at everything they've said, everything they've written, what their surrogates and the media have done, and I discovered they do have a counter-agenda. They really do. And it's organized.
And I want to give it a fair hearing right now. So, I wrote down 10 things that I think are thematic of the Democratic agenda that offers an alternative to President Donald Trump.
The first is that Donald Trump must be considered, as Chris Matthews just said, a Mussolini-like figure. He must be opposed in every aspect. He must be demonized. Everything he does is evil.
And by extension, the same is true of Elon Musk. You must consider him an alien who should go back home to South Africa. That he's not a true American. He's only been here 23 years.
You cannot talk about his Tesla revolution that pretty much saved the idea of an electric vehicle. You cannot talk about the successes of SpaceX. You cannot talk about saving social media by opening it up and getting the government out, i.e., the FBI colluding with the old Twitter. You cannot talk about giving free internet service to Ukraine.
He's evil. And everything he does must be opposed. And we must continue that to the point where he is depersonalized.
The second thing I've noticed, very quickly, is Immigration and Customs Enforcement is wrong. You have to stop ICE from deporting anybody, even if they're a criminal.
Open borders are completely normal. We let in 12 million people under President Joe Biden. We have no apologies whatsoever. No major Democrat has come forward and said, "We made a mistake. We've overloaded communities, like the San Joaquin Valley or the Rio Grande Valley and the inner city. It's cost us perhaps a trillion dollars in social costs. We apologize."
No. Everything about open borders was wonderful. And we will try, as Democrats, as much as we can to stop ICE from deporting even criminals. Sanctuary cities are immune—600 of them.
Radical Palestinians are to be favored over Israel. We see that with the controversy over Mahmoud Khalil. We in the Democratic Party feel that Israel is a settler country.
Now, this is the only issue that the majority of Democrats are clearly for. About 70%, and 65% of Democrats favor the Palestinian cause. So, there's no ambiguity about it now.
Democrats feel that Israel is the culprit. And if there's antisemitism on campus, it's sporadic or it's done by people other than the pro-Hamas green card holder or student visa holder.
There should be no cuts. No cuts in the federal government. We have a $1.7 trillion deficit. Joe Biden probably racked up $7 to $8 trillion in additional debt, but $36 trillion is no problem. We're not going to discuss it.
All we know is there should be no layoffs. Everything that USAID was funding was fine. And the federal government was running perfectly until Donald Trump came. There was no abuse, fraud, or anything. We have never talked about fraud and abuse in recent years. And there was a reason why we're perfectly happy with these massive deficits.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
One of the most inspiring miracles recorded in Scripture is the famous healing of a man who had been blind from birth.
What's especially interesting is the recipe Jesus used to give the man his sight. It involves putting mud on his face, specifically, his eyes.
It has been retold countless times, and featured prominently in the 2003 film, "The Gospel of John."
But what's the reason mud was employed as a tool in this wondrous healing?
The author of a best-selling book decoding the hidden, additional meaning behind events in Scripture explored the miracle during an episode of the popular Bible TV show, "Shabbat Night Live."
"The Bible is very consistent in its symbols and imagery," said Joe Kovacs, author of "Reaching God Speed: Unlocking the Secret Broadcast Revealing the Mystery of Everything."
"Mud is the dust of the earth. It represents the flesh" on the metaphoric level of parables, because we're all made of the dust of the earth, and Jesus only taught in parables. (Matthew 13:34)
The Bible records the event this way:
"After he said these things he spit on the ground, made some mud from the saliva, and spread the mud on his eyes.
"'Go,' he told him, 'wash in the pool of Siloam' (which means "Sent"). So he left, washed, and came back seeing.
"His neighbors and those who had seen him before as a beggar said, 'Isn't this the one who used to sit begging?'
"Some said, 'He's the one.' Others were saying, 'No, but he looks like him.'
"He kept saying, 'I'm the one.'
"So they asked him, 'Then how were your eyes opened?'
"He answered, 'The man called Jesus made mud, spread it on my eyes, and told me, "Go to Siloam and wash." So when I went and washed I received my sight'" (John 9:6–11 CSB).
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Under Joe Biden's failed green ideology, America was supposed to be getting its electricity from wind and solar power.
Billions of taxpayer dollars went for grants to solar, wind, and other politically correct agendas.
Never mind that the wind doesn't always blow and the sun doesn't always shine, the Democrat's agenda was to impose strict global warming rules that would force coal power plants, which once provided half of America's power, to close.
Under President Donald Trump, that campaign has reversed.
A report from the Cowboy State Daily confirmed that federal regulators have approved the expansion of the Spring Creek Mine in Montana.
The report said that's "on-the-ground evidence of the President Donald Trump administration's push to ramp up the mining and burning of coal."
Trump himself said on social media he wants to open, or reopen, "hundreds of all Coal Fire Power Plants" and get the United States "producing Energy with BEAUTIFUL, CLEAN COAL."
The Montana project being expanded is by Navajo Transitional Energy Co. and the company said the expansion means the project will serve energy needs for an additional 16 years.
Coal production, in recent years under Biden, had dropped.
PRB mines in Wyoming produced 185 million tons of coal in 2024, the report said, citing the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration. That was the first time that production was below 200 million tons.
The White House also is reviewing "soot standards" and "greenhouse gas limits" in its efforts to make energy available again.
"Trump already signed an executive order declaring a national energy emergency and directed the Environmental Protection Agency to boost fossil fuel production and distribution," Bloomberg said.
The report noted Barack Obama also had a hand in attacks on coal power production, which despite those assaults still recently was providing 15% of American power.
The report said nearly 300 coal-fired power plants shut down from 2010 to 2019.
That's changing.
"It's really nice to have a presidential administration that recognizes the value of Wyoming's coal resources and is looking to work with us to keep developing and using our coal, rather than to actively try to shut us down," Travis Deti, head of the Wyoming Mining Association, told the Cowboy State Daily. "I think what we're going to see is a real shift in the direction of the policy coming out of Washington, D.C."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
PALM BEACH, Florida – Both President Donald Trump and DOGE leader Elon Musk are reacting to unearthed, two-year-old remarks by a federal judge who is now trying to halt deportation flights for violent illegal alien criminals.
The comments by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg concerned the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol protesters and were posted by conservative influencer Insurrection Barbie on X:
In a speech on given to law students on January 24, 2023, Judge Boasberg (who heard many J6 cases) openly admitted that he didn't think harsh enough laws existed on the books to punish J6 defendants.
He stated: "a lot of law still to be made." Matching the defendants' alleged crimes to statutes is one challenge and there were no statutes that were written that said, 'it is a criminal offense to storm the capital and interfere with the counting of certification of the electoral college after the presidential election."
He also specifically stated that people pled to crimes that were not harsh enough. For instance, he said people have pled to the misdemeanor of "parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a capitol building," which was meant to cover people yelling and disrupting Congress, not for the crime of storming the Capitol."
He openly discussed his bias towards these defendants when speaking to future lawyers. He thought people should have been treated differently because it was J6 …
If you don't want us to drag these people, maybe they should learn to hide their bias.
Journalist Mario Nawfal said of the comments: "Translation: He wanted to invent new crimes after the fact to punish J6 defendants harder – clear judicial bias from the bench."
Trump on Sunday reposted the judge's remarks on Truth Social, adding his own reaction to Boasberg: "But he [the judge] doesn't mind if criminals come into our Country. He is a Constitutional disaster! DJT."
Elon Musk noted of Boasberg's comments: "Wow, this is insane."
A few minutes later Sunday afternoon, Musk added: "He has a villainous look to him."
Earlier on Sunday, the nation's top cop indicated the highest court in America will "get involved" in the cases of "out-of-control" federal judges who are working to thwart the agenda of President Donald Trump.
Appearing on "Sunday Morning Futures" with Maria Bartiromo on the Fox News Channel, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said concerning Judge Boasberg halting deportation flights of violent criminals, "The Supreme Court will get involved."
"This is an out-of-control judge, a federal judge trying to control our entire foreign policy and he cannot do it."