This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Under U.S. law, before an employer can sponsor a foreign worker for permanent residency (green card) through the PERM labor certification process, they are legally required to first recruit for the job and consider all qualified U.S. workers, YES including U.S. citizens. This is not optional. It is federal law.

My process is simple. I identify PERM job listings, review the qualifications, and only apply when I clearly meet or exceed every listed requirement. In most cases, I am not just qualified, I am overqualified, with advanced degrees, certifications, and over 10 years of direct experience that wasn't faked.

So far, I have applied to over 7,000 PERM job openings (and counting) across multiple industries. Despite being fully qualified for every single one, I have been interviewed fewer than five times. In nearly every other case, I was either rejected outright or simply ignored.

Many of these employers went on to sponsor a foreign worker for the same job by filing a Form 9089. Others reposted the exact same role a few months later and ignored me again. I applied every time. This is not a coincidence. It is part of a pattern.

This behavior is not just unethical. It is illegal and discriminatory.

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, this violates 8 U.S.C. § 1324b. I have reported many of these employers to the Department of Justice's Immigrant and Employee Rights Section. If companies want to ignore qualified American citizens, they can explain it to federal investigators.

This is not just about me. This is about thousands of American workers being pushed aside in their own country by a system that prioritizes cheap, less skilled, and always compliant foreign labor and corporate profit over fairness, merit, and the law.

If you believe Americans should come first in America, it is time to pay attention. The system is being abused. And we are blowing the whistle.

Last week, I learned several of the DOJ investigations I triggered have officially moved into the accountability phase.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The two U.S. senators from Wyoming are co-sponsoring a plan that immediately would address the problem of leftist federal judges at the entry-court level, in district courts, who have been controlling America's nationwide security and safety policies through their injunctions.

It would simply remove their authority to issue those mandates that follow their own political agendas.

District judges were fans of the practice during President Donald Trump's first term, and immediately resumed their activism when he took office for his second term.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A federal judge has trashed a leftists' scheme that would have forced pro-life pregnancy centers to promote abortion.

Pro-life physicians also would have been targeted by the agenda.

According to a report from the Thomas More Society, U.S. District Court Judge Iain D. Johnston has released a decision in Schroeder, et al. v. Treto, Jr., and it struck down as unconstitutional a provision in the Illinois Health Care Right of Conscience Act.

That provision would have compelled pro-lifers to promote abortion "talking points" to women.

The report explained, "In striking down the HCRCA's mandate that pro-life physicians and pregnancy centers share the 'benefits of abortion,' Judge Johnston wrote, 'Constitutionally, to obtain the liability shield, the State can't require medical professionals to discuss with patients what the State believes are the benefits of abortions.'"

The court noted pro-life physicians and pregnancy centers "are required to effectively endorse a course of conduct they find morally abhorrent."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

It's one of the most famous events in all of the Bible, prominently featured in both the Old and New Testaments.

Passover broadcasts the message of rescuing people from the death penalty through the slaying of a lamb, whom Christians believe represents Jesus Christ, called the Lamb of God.

But as millions of believers across the globe commemorate the annual event this year, there are some intriguing aspects to the original Passover that many may have overlooked or never understood.

"The original event involving Moses leading the Israelites out of Egypt is quite famous, but there are numerous hidden nuggets that are bursting with new life when they're understood at the Spirit level," says author Joe Kovacs, who examines Passover in depth in his latest best-seller, "Reaching God Speed: Unlocking the Secret broadcast Revealing the Mystery of Everything."

"We need to remember that Jesus only taught people in parables, and 'without a parable, He did not speak'" (Matthew 13:34 NKJV).

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

There's no lack of evidence for the extreme brutality of Islamic jihadists.

On that Oct. 7, 2023, day that members of Hamas invaded Israel, they burned whole families together, abused victims, then murdered them, and more.

Evidence already was abundant that similar events were occurring in Africa.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

The war between Israel and the Middle East's Iranian proxies has dragged on for nearly one and a half years. Now, a new book explores a seemingly obscure event that both Hamas and Hezbollah have claimed sparked their attacks on the Jewish state: the arrival of five red calves, brought to Israel by a cooperative effort of Orthodox Jews and devout Evangelical Christians.

On a sweltering day in September 2022, Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz stood at the cargo terminal of Ben Gurion International Airport, awaiting a very special arrival. Boneh Israel, a cooperative effort of Christians and Jews, had succeeded in airlifting five young cows to Israel from Texas. Christians had gone to great effort and expense to find a red cow that fit the exacting requirements to fulfill a commandment required to prepare Jews to serve in the prophesied Third Temple in Jerusalem. Berkowitz, an Orthodox Jew, had been writing articles about news and politics in Israel since 2013, specializing in a biblical and prophetic perspective that appealed to Orthodox Jews and Zionist Christians alike, so the event was his area of expertise.

But the arrival of the red heifers was a watershed, marking a significant step in reviving the Temple service the likes of which had not been seen in living memory. While much of the Christian and Jewish worlds overlooked the significance, the Islamists in the region did not.

Last year, on the 100th day of the Oct. 7 Swords of Iron war, Abu Obeida, the military spokesman for the Izz ad-Din Al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of the Palestinian Hamas terrorist organization, made a rare televised appearance in which he listed the motives for the Hamas attack on Israel.

In his speech, he referred to the attack as "the Al Aqsa flood," a reference to the Muslim mosque on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Arab-language media covered Abu Abeidah's speech extensively, focusing on the arrival of five red heifers to Israel as a prelude to constructing the Third Jewish Temple. As an indication of the significance of the Temple Mount to the Gazans, IDF soldiers reported that almost every home they entered in the Strip featured an image of the Dome of the Rock. Indeed, Hamas' emblem of the terror organization features the Dome of the Rock behind crossed swords.

Hezbollah also cited the arrival of the red heifers as the motive for attacking Israel, as more Iranian proxies joined in the war against the Jewish state.

Meanwhile, YouTubers who were ignorant of the true nature of the red heifers went viral, spreading misinformation. Documentaries and articles misrepresented the red heifers, claiming that it was an attempt by Jewish fanatics to incite the Arabs.

Berkowitz realized he had no choice but to write a book about the red heifers. The book, titled "The Return of the Red Heifers: Paving the Road to Redemption," covers every aspect of what the Jewish sages have described as "the most enigmatic Biblical commandment." Berkowitz explains the Biblical and Talmudic sources in plain language, from the exacting requirements to the complex ritual that produces ashes required to purify Jews to serve in the Temple. The cow must be perfectly red with no more than one non-red hair on its entire body. It must be unblemished and never have carried a yoke or a burden of any kind.

While these requirements sound simple, they are complex, and finding a suitable heifer is rare. Berkowitz explains that according to Jewish tradition, only nine red heifers were found from the time of Mount Sinai until the destruction of the Second Temple 2,000 years later. The tenth red heifer will be used to purify the Jewish nation for serving in the Third Temple.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Leftists recently attacked and destroyed a display assembled by Turning Point USA for students at the campus of the University of California-Davis.

While cops stood by and watched.

TPUSA said, "Our 'Prove Me Wrong' tabling event with @TheOfficerTatum at UC Davis was completely destroyed by violent protesters. They stole the canopy, ripped down banners, smashed foam boards, and even tried to steal the iPad and laptop of a @tpusastudents field rep. TPUSA students were shoved and had objects thrown at them—while police did nothing. Only after the damage was done did law enforcement finally form a perimeter. This is the reality of free speech on campus."

Constitutional expert Jonathan Turley, who has advised Congress on the Constitution, and even represented Congress on constitutional issues, had a comment: "A mob of roughly 30 masked protesters at UC Davis attacked a tent for a conservative student group, the UC Davis chapter of Turning Point USA. It proceeded to destroy the tent and displays without any intervention from campus police, who were shown standing nearby."

He noted the police "followed the rampaging mob and did not attempt to detain anyone. The mob appears to have been led by Antifa members, a violent anti-free speech group."

He continued, "The university said in a news release that it is investigating. However, the university insisted, 'The event with the guest speaker took place on schedule and was completed without further incident. The university protected the free speech rights of the campus community throughout the event. 'Without further incident' has that feel of asking 'other than that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?'"

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

It's the fast-track for a court hearing on charges by Liberty University that a worker, hired and then fired, deceived the school and violated a standard to which he had agreed, all in order to undermine the school's religious rights.

The fight is over a lawsuit brought by Jonathan Zinski against Liberty. He was hired but then fired shortly after his probation period had ended.

He had agreed at hiring to follow the school's religious standards, but then after the probationary period claimed he was a woman and would be portraying himself as a "she." He also confirmed that he had been taking drugs to "transition" even before he was hired by the school.

But the school's standards, based on the Bible, recognize male and female and do not support those who claim to change from one to the other, a scientific impossibility.

Liberty Counsel is representing the school and Chief Mat Staver said, "The appeal certification allows Liberty University to appeal this critically important question of religious freedom which can result in controlling the outcome of the case. Zinski intentionally and deceptively set up Liberty University in an attempt to undermine its religious beliefs and mission. Title VII exempts Liberty University from having to employ individuals who violate its religious beliefs and doctrinal positions."

Liberty Counsel confirmed the U.S. District Court of Western Virginia now has certified the appeal for expedited consideration regarding the Title VII lawsuit, Zinski v. Liberty University.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A transgender agenda adopted by many school districts across the nation, a policy that is being challenged over and over by parents, has taken a huge hit in a court in the leftist state of California.

There, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has revived a lawsuit by a mother against the Chico Unified School District over the decision by officials there to covertly help her fifth-grade daughter's "gender transition."

That's the idea that a girl can become a boy, or vice versa, through chemicals and body mutilating surgeries, even though that, by science, can't happen as being male or female is embedded in the human body down to the DNA level.

Nevertheless, as part of the agenda, wildly and extensively promoted by Joe Biden while he was in office, schools often allow their teachers, counselors, and others to persuade children they are transgender. Then they facilitate treatments for the child, all the while keeping their actions secret from parents who almost never would approve.

According to a report from the Center for American Liberty, an organization launched by attorney Harmeet K. Dhillon, who now is serving in the Trump administration, "The Constitution is clear, parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing of their children. Government-run schools cannot usurp that role behind closed doors."

The report called the decision from the 9th Circuit a "significant First and Fourteenth Amendment victory."

The appeals court ruled that the case brought by Aurora Regino "may proceed, reversing a lower court's dismissal."

The decision said, "the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children."

"Today's decision restores hope to parents nationwide that their rights don't end when their children enter the classroom," said Mark Trammell, CEO of the Center for American Liberty. "The Constitution is clear, parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing of their children. Government-run schools cannot usurp that role behind closed doors."

"Regino filed the lawsuit after learning that her 11-year-old daughter's school had been affirming a new gender identity, complete with name and pronoun changes, over a period of weeks, all without any notification to or involvement from her. At the time, her daughter was struggling with mental health issues, including anxiety and depression," the organization reported.

Regino said, "No mother should ever be blindsided by a secret school policy that excludes parents from life-changing interventions."

The opinion also said that "the right to familial association encompasses the right of parents to make important decisions about their children's health and education," a conclusion that is seen as putting guardrails around "ideologically driven practices in public education."

The organization reported the case began for Regino's daughter, A.S. "when an elementary school guidance counselor decided to socially transition her from female to male without Aurora's consent. In fact, the school never even notified Aurora that this transition was happening."

The CAL said, "It took the school guidance counselor just minutes to determine (1) that A.S. was really a boy, and (2) that at school A.S. would have a male identity: new name, new pronouns, etc.—after A.S. confidentially expressed gender confusion to her. But it took no time at all for the Chico Unified School District to decide to socially transition A.S. without so much as a phone call to her mother, Aurora."

In California, extremists at the state level decided that schools are prohibited from telling parents about such "gender transitions."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Watch as a pro-life activist is brutally attacked and punched by a hate-filled attacker while doing interviews.

Savannah Craven was assaulted while interviewing people on the streets of Harlem:

The attacker is talking about the "magnitude" of having a child, and Craven responds, then directs the microphone back to the interviewee, who lunges forward and smashes her fist into Craven's face.

The video is from Live Action, which reported, that Craven's husband, Henry Antao, explained a woman approached and started a conversation.

"But during the interview, she suddenly assaulted Craven Antao," the report said.

Craven had pointed out, "I'm not the one who admitted they would be okay with killing babies in foster care and killing children that had been abused."

Then the woman knocked Craven to the ground.

"She appeared to attempt to assault her a second time, but Craven Antao's husband positioned himself in between them. Craven Antano was brought to the hospital for her injuries," the report said.

Antao told Live Action, "[We] were out on the street in Harlem doing some street interviews. My wife … was assaulted by a pro-abortion woman we were interviewing… The woman became aggressive and violent upon learning Savannah's pro-life stance. I intervened to protect my wife and we immediately called 911. The police arrived, and we provided them with the assailant's photo and description. We hope justice will be served soon."

Antao said, "We are pro-life activists because ending abortion and protecting babies from the violence that Planned Parenthood commits is the most important issue of our lifetime."

Social media responded:

"Killing children is the ultimate violent act, so punching someone is nothing."

"The left is so violent and uncivilized."

"That's assault."