This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
American voters resoundingly rejected Kamala Harris at the last presidential election.
She lost, by landslide numbers, at the Electoral College, the popular vote, and much more.
That's even though she spent some $1.5 billion in three months, on travel, friends' endorsement appearances and such.
Now the Free Beacon is reporting even Democrat fundraisers are rejecting her.
The publication confirmed, "Major Democratic donors turned down the Democratic National Committee's request to host a fundraiser, with one sending a 'profanity-laced' message in response."
The Wall Street Journal said, of the dispute, "At one point earlier this year, the DNC reached out to big donors to host a San Francisco-area fundraiser headlined by former Vice President Kamala Harris. Most of the donors rejected the request."
The result was that while the event eventually was held, it "brought in less than the committee had hoped."
In fact, Democrats continue paying off Harris' campaign debt even now, a year after her catastrophic loss.
The Journal said, "Upon receiving the invitation, one [donor] replied with a profanity-laced rejection. Others said they didn't want to give to the party until it produced substantive plans to win elections. Those who declined told the national party they had commitments and couldn't make it work."
The Free Beacon revealed that the DNC is trailing, by far, the Republicans in fundraising.
"At the start of October, the DNC held around $12 million in cash reserves, compared with the Republican National Committee's $86 million," the report said.
Financial troubles, infighting, disorganization, a lack of leadership and a lack of coherent message to which voters would respond all have plagued the party since Harris replaced a mentally failing Joe Biden in the 2024 race, and immediately turned to such extremist positions voters were repelled.
The Democrats' collapse has become such that, at one point, the committee tossed out its own now-former vice chair.
The Journal claimed, "Some donors remain angry about how their money was spent in last year's presidential election by outside groups, including on what they see as excessive salaries for Washington, D.C., consultants."
