Lawsuit challenging the 2020 presidential election added to the Supreme Court docket

The Supreme Court added Brunson v. Adams, a lawsuit brought by Utah resident Raland Brunson challenging the 2020 election, to the docket and is scheduled for a hearing on Jan. 6, 2023.

The case has flown under the radar but it names President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, former Vice President Mike Pence, and the 385 members of Congress that voted to certify the 2020 election results. The case alleges that the defendants all “intentionally refused to investigate evidence” of fraud in the 2020 election.

The Supreme Court’s decision to hold a hearing on the two-year anniversary of the protest at the Capitol on the day the results were certified is fitting.

Unprecedented action

This lawsuit is one of the most significant legal challenges to the 2020 presidential election in the judicial system. The fact that it will be heard before the Supreme Court is a miracle and could be a sign of something massive coming.

The lawsuit alleges that the defendant’s behavior was akin to an “act of war against the United States Constitution that violated their oath to uphold the Constitution and his right to participate in an honest and fair election.”

Should the Supreme Court choose to further litigate this case, it would represent a huge threat to not just President Biden, but every member of Congress that voted to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Congress to blame for election fraud

What makes Brunson v. Adams different from the other challenges is that it doesn’t seek to prove there was fraud in the 2020 election. Rather it alleges that Congress refused to even do its due diligence in ensuring the election was safe and secure.

Tim Canova, a constitutional law scholar and professor at Nova Southeastern University’s Shepard Broad College of Law in Florida, commented on the case saying, “The fact that the Brunson case has made it to the Court’s docket suggests profound concerns about a lawless Jan. 6 congressional committee, politicized federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies and major constitutional violations intended to overthrow an elected government by manipulating the outcome of the presidential election.”

Canova continued by saying, “Supreme Court justices may well see these approaching storm clouds and conclude that the Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections.”

The revelations about the level of election interference conducted by the federal government with the help of Big Tech companies have reignited tension over the 2020 election. If the Supreme Court doesn’t rectify the situation quickly, the nation could be in grave danger.

A turning point for the nation

If the Supreme Court finds that Brunson’s allegations are legitimate, not only would it delegitimize President Biden’s victory in the 2020 election, it would vindicate Donald Trump and the Republican Party.

Furthermore, it would vindicate those who protested the certification of the 2020 election results in the protest on Jan. 6th, 2020.

That protest which devolved into a riot, or as some alleged, was manipulated into a riot, has seen many Americans held as political prisoners for the past two years.

While the Supreme Court has kept quiet about Brunson v. Adams, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see the Biden administration kick into full gear to prepare for the possibility of a full hearing.

Latest News