Could there possibly be justice on the horizon for Hillary Clinton?
After a federal judge ordered that Hillary Clinton must now answer additional questions about her email set up when she was Secretary of State, conservatives are chomping at the bit.
Thanks to a massive effort on the part of conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, Americans may finally learn the truth about Hillary’s emails.
The organization has been repeatedly thwarted by our own Justice Department, so they took their case to the courts.
While a judge denied them access to video depositions given by Hillary’s aides, the court did agree to Hillary having to answer additional questions about her email set up.
Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha! https://t.co/VBKkm3H8gi pic.twitter.com/00k6pRsHNe
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) November 15, 2018
While Judicial Watch clearly wanted access to more information, they were able to get the judge to order Hillary to answer two specific questions she had previously refused to answer:
Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.
During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.
A question Hillary will not have to answer, however, is why she continuously ignored warnings to stop using her Blackberry.
The former Secretary of State had been warned numerous times by her own State Department security team.
Additionally, Judicial Watch inquired about the dual status of Huma Abedin.
For some reason, while employed as Hillary’s Chief of Staff, she was also able to secure outside employment, presenting security risks.
This may not be the complete transparency Americans expected from the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton, but it is a start.