Constitutional Expert: J6 Panel Failed to Present ‘Credible Criminal Case’ Against Trump

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Amid much fanfare and with the help of leftists in the media, soon-to-be-replaced House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s partisan committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol released a report insisting the U.S. Justice Department investigate and charge President Donald Trump.

Its claims include making a false statement, defrauding the U.S., conspiracy, and inciting insurrection.

Constitutional expert Jonathan Turley, a professor at George Washington University Law School, said, however, there simply is no “compelling criminal case.”

“The committee repackaged largely the same evidence that it has previously put forward over the past year. That is not enough. Indeed, the reliance on a new videotape of former Trump aide Hope Hicks seems a case of putting ‘hope over experience’ in the criminal justice system,” he explained.

TRENDING: DHS chief accused of erasing 300,000 illegals from reporting

He noted members like Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who long claimed he had seen evidence of the “collusion” with Russia by the 2016 Trump campaign, a conspiracy theory that long since has been debunked, insist that the committee presented “new evidence” of crimes.

Instead, Turley said, “The committee continued its pattern of rehashing previously known evidence with network-quality videotapes.”

He explained, “The failure of the committee to offer any new and direct evidence of criminal conduct was obvious at the outset. Vice Chair Liz Cheney began her remarks by again detailing what Trump failed to do. It was a repeat of the prior hearings and for some likely left the impression of actors who are refusing to leave the stage long after the audience departed.”

The “one piece” of new evidence was a statement for former aide Hope Hicks, but it ended up being “duplicative,” he said.

“The fact is that the J6 Committee failed to change many minds largely because of what was on display in the final public meeting. It was the same highly scripted, one-sided account repeated mantra-like for months. There is justifiable anger over these accounts, but this hearing was billed as presenting the case for criminal charges. It missed that mark by a considerable measure,” he concluded.

He cited other comments that Trump could be charged with attempted murder or manslaughter.

 

Latest News