This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Democrats in America suffered a stunning political loss in the 2024 presidential race.
President-elect Donald Trump not only won the Electoral College in a landslide, but also the popular vote – by many millions of votes.
The response from losers has been outrage, insult, fantasy and now criminal actions.
A statement from the Trump campaign cited the most recent response: threats and "swatting" against Trump nominees.
This follows at least two failed assassination attempts against Trump in the weeks leading up to the election. In one of those, a sniper hit Trump in the ear before being shot and killed by law enforcement. A second assassination attempt suspect is in custody.
"Last night and this morning, several of President Trump's Cabinet nominees and Administration appointees were targeted in violent, unAmerican threats to their lives and those who live with them. These attacks ranged from bomb threats to 'swatting.' In response, law enforcement and other authorities acted quickly to ensure the safety of those who were targeted. President Trump and the entire Transition team are grateful for their swift action," the campaign said.
"President Trump and the Transition are focused on doing the work of uniting our nation by ensuring a safe and prosperous future. With President Trump as our example, dangerous acts of intimidation and violence will not deter us," said Karoline Leavitt, Trump-Vance Transition spokeswoman.
"Swatting" is when someone falsely reports a dangerous situation to law enforcement, prompting officers, armed, to respond, with the goal of causing harm to the "swatting" target.
Democrats already publicly have called for a "shadow government" to be assembled, a coalition of Democrat officials to "act" in ways that oppose the Trump agenda, which will be addressed by Republican majorities in the House and Senate.
Hollywood celebrities have essentially called a majority of Americans dumb and stupid for their votes for Trump, and Democrat legislators have fantasized about seceding from America and joining Canada as a province.
The Federalist reports that the Biden-Harris regime is trying to sabotage Trump's presidency during its final few weeks in power.
"After their major election loss, Democrats are doubling down on their worldview by trying to save the monstrous deep state they have been building for decades and making sure their own ranks still fall in line with radical social policies," the report said.
"As President Joe Biden prepares to leave office, he and his party are scrambling to undermine one of President-elect Donald Trump's campaign promises: cull the odious deep state. Biden is reportedly being pushed by his party to bolster the federal bureaucracy in the waning weeks of his presidency. Rep. Jared Huffman, D-Calif., said the Biden administration has already done some 'scenario planning,' as it attempts to 'fortify the Justice Department, the intelligence agencies and other offices in Trump's crosshairs.'"
Further, Biden recently has approved Ukraine's use of American weapons to launch attacks inside Russia in the war between those entities, radically escalating that conflict in a move that could trigger a nuclear response.
The report explained, "The Trump transition appears poised to fulfill campaign promises to break apart the intelligence apparatus with the nomination of former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, as director of national intelligence, cut out the far-left rot at the top levels the military by firing activist generals, appoint an attorney general prepared to stop the weaponization of the Department of Justice, and substantially dismantle the federal bureaucracy both with the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency and the appointment of Russ Vought to helm the Office of Management and Budget."
The Democrats now, the report said, want "Biden to sign a barrage of executive orders in his last days, alter union contracts of federal workers to make them even harder to fire, ram through far-left judges, blow open government funding of projects already approved by Congress before the can be stopped, and finalize federal rulemaking."
While the Trump statement didn't include details, U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., confirmed she was targeted.
"This morning, Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, her husband, and their three year old son were driving home to Saratoga County from Washington for Thanksgiving when they were informed of a bomb threat to their residence. New York State, County law enforcement, and U.S. Capitol Police responded immediately with the highest levels of professionalism.
"We are incredibly appreciative of the extraordinary dedication of law enforcement officers who keep our communities safe 24/7. We want to share our best wishes to the Upstate NY community for a happy and safe Thanksgiving. We are especially grateful to our law enforcement officers and military families who are on duty over the holiday season."
Others targeted include: Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth, CIA Director nominee John Ratcliffe, and Agriculture Secretary nominee Brooke Rollins.
The FBI released a statement indicating it's "aware of numerous bomb threats and swatting incidents" targeting Trump's nominees.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
JERUSALEM – Authorities in the United Arab Emirates made a shocking discovery Sunday after they found the lifeless remains of a Chabad movement emissary, who had been missing – feared abducted – since Thursday.
Rabbi Zvi Kogan, a dual Israeli-Moldovan citizen, who was a relative, through his wife of Rabbi Gavriel Holzberg, the Chabad emissary who was murdered, along with his wife, Rivka, in the Mumbai terrorist atrocity in 2008, was feared missing after he failed to appear at a number of scheduled meetings he had during the day.
After a prolonged period of failure to reach Kogan, his wife, also named Rivka, and who is a U.S. citizen, spoke to the Chabad house security officer, who promptly alerted the Abu Dhabi authorities. Information was also shared with the Israeli authorities, and the story about the hunt for the missing rabbi – and the palpable fears for his safety – caught the internet alight.
Both Kogan's body and his car were located in Al-Ain, an inland oasis city on the eastern border with Oman, approximately 90 miles from the capital Abu Dhabi. Israeli outlet Ynet claimed the authorities found signs of violence on the body, and there were also indications of a struggle in Kogan's car, although it did not provide evidence yet, for this assertion. Suspicion quickly fell on an Iranian-backed terrorist cell populated with Uzbek nationals.
"Israeli authorities are aware that the Uzbeks traveled to Turkey, and Israeli security agencies are coordinating with Turkish officials to uncover the truth. A delegation from Israel has been sent to the UAE to oversee the investigation," according to the Jewish News Syndicate.
Kogan's disappearance was front-page news in Israel, and now his body has been found, the country's leaders reacted with fury at the violence meted out to the religious emissary. Israel's President Isaac Herzog wrote on X: "I mourn with sorrow and outrage the murder of Rabbi Zvi Kogan."
"This vile antisemitic attack is a reminder of the inhumanity of the enemies of the Jewish people. It will not deter us from continuing to grow flourishing communities in the UAE or anywhere – especially with the help of the dedicated commitment and work of the Chabad emissaries all over the world."
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke before the weekly Sunday cabinet meeting about Rabbi Kogan and also took to X to decry the brutality of his murder, adding those who sought to destabilize the region and drive a wedge between Israel and the UAE would not succeed.
The Prime Minister's Office also reiterated the warning about the UAE having a level 3 travel advisory warning according to the National Security Council. It stipulates only essential travel should be undertaken, and those already in the country should take extra precautions.
The Chabad organization, which operates its houses in most countries of the world and which has tens of thousands of emissaries (and their families), reacted with "great pain" to the discovery of Rabbi Kogan's body. The organization asked people to do a good deed in his memory.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The United Kingdom has, in many ways, gone over the edge.
It is demanding that it can control thoughts, such as silent prayer, in abortion business "no-go" zones where some people aren't allowed because of their beliefs.
It has worked toward a strict set of guidelines that would require people to make only affirmative statements about some extremely damaging lifestyle choices, because anything negative is "hate."
And now it is having police investigate 9-year-olds for saying someone smells like fish.
It's according to the Daily Mail that one student, put by officers in a bull's-eye, actually was alleged to have called a fellow primary school student a "retard."
Two schoolgirls found themselves under investigation for saying another student smelled "like fish."
These all are being compiled in formal police records as "non-crime hate incidents."
The government says such incidents are "clearly motivated by intentional hostility" and are recorded when "there is a genuine risk of significant escalation."
But, the report said, "incidents in classrooms that do not amount to crimes are not meant to be recorded."
The report said the situation reached a peak of absurdity when journalist Allisan Pearson was "investigated" by police over a social media post – from a year ago. The award-winning journalist told the Telegraph cops turned up on her door over something written on X.
Former police minister Chris Philp said the situations have become "totally absurd."
Not only does it take police away from pursuing criminals, it threats to chill free speech, he said.
A commentary at the Gatestone Institute noted that Britain now "might finally be waking up to the fact that it elected a totalitarian government."
As in like "the Chinese Communist Party."
The vague standard now is that "any non-crime incident that is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice based on a person's race, religion, sexual orientation, disability or transgender identity must be recorded, even if there is no evidence of the hate element."
The commentary noted since 2014, British police have reportedly recorded more than 250,000 non-crime hate incidents in England and Wales. The non-crime incidents, logged in a system, can even show up, when employers ask for a copy of a prospective employee's criminal record."
The records show police recorded one boy for having an "unhealthy interest in weapons" because he owned a toy crossbow.
The commentary said, "There are lots of things that people did not fight and die for in the war but that the mainstream British media has ignored for decades: Mass migration from the Muslim world; rampant violence and terrorism; Muslim grooming gangs, raping, torturing, sometimes killing, hundreds of thousands of British children and young women while the police covered up their crimes."
The commentary noted that there even have been people jailed for criticizing Islam and mass migration, on the ground that they "were stirring up racial hatred."
The report explained, "Scotland Yard also spent 15 months investigating Maya Forstater, the executive director of Sex Matters, which campaigns for clarity about sex in law and policy, after a complaint that a post she made about a transgender doctor was a 'malicious communication.' She, too, was not told what tweet she was being investigated for or who had made the complaint until she agreed to turn up to an interview with police officers."
It found, "Most recently, the police informed a man, a street preacher, that saying 'God bless you' is a crime, if it causes 'distress' to someone who has a different belief – such as Muslims."
Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte has threatened to assassinate the President and the House of Representatives speaker if she is killed.
The shocking statement from Duterte came as she and Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. have had a bitter fallout over the last two years over major policy differences and now Duterte is escalating tensions exponentially.
Duterte's threat has been referred to the elite presidential guards force “for immediate proper action," but it remains to be seen if actions will be taken against Duterte.
President Marcos’ security has been beefed up and the government is considering the vice president's “brazenly" and "public” threat a national security issue.
Presidential security reportedly is “coordinating with law enforcement agencies to detect, deter, and defend against any and all threats to the president and the first family," to ensure that all parties threatened by the Vice President are safe.
Relations between Duterte and Marcos have been on the decline since the pair won a decisive electoral victory in 2022, ironically on a platform promoting national unity.
The pair quickly fell into infighting over how to handle China’s aggressive actions in the disputed South China Sea and Duterte ended up resigning as Marcos's education secretary and head of an anti-insurgency body in June.
Since then, Duterte has been ramping up attacks on Marcos and his allies accusing them of corruption, incompetence and politically persecuting the Duterte family.
Sara Duterte is the daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, an infamous figure who became internationally recognized for his brutal crackdown on drug users and traffickers.
Marcos and his allies in the House of Representatives recently ordered the arrest of Duterte's chief of staff for allegedly hampering a congressional inquiry into the possible misuse of Duterte's budget as vice president and education secretary.
By all accounts, it appears that each side is engaged in political lawfare, much like what President-elect Donald Trump has been dealing with for years. With how bad things have gotten, Duterte is fearing for her life which has led to her threats against her enemies.
Following the arrest of her chief of staff, Duterte held a press conference where she stated, "Don’t worry about my security because I’ve talked with somebody. I said ‘if I’m killed, you’ll kill BBM, Liza Araneta and Martin Romualdez. No joke, no joke.'"
Filipino legal code contains provisions that make such statements like Duterte's possibly criminal but that remains to be seen if charges will be brought against her.
As for the international community, the situation in the Philippines remains closely watched. Some fear civil war could break out as Duterte and Marcos continue to splinter and amplify threats against each other.
Military Chief General Romeo Brawner issued a statement saying that the 160,000-member Armed Forces of the Philippines will remain uninvolved and respect democratic institutions, but there is reason to be concerned that that could change.
Legal cases from the Jan. 6 Capitol protest and riot are still playing out, but some of the aspects of that day that flew under the radar are now resurfacing, including the theft of Rep. Nancy Pelosi's (D-CA) laptop.
According to reports, a woman called Riley Williams was the first person accused of stealing Pelosi's laptop from the U.S. Capitol on that day, but was later fully acquitted.
However, her lawyer says that the U.S. government under President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris hasn't done much in the way of correcting the narrative about his client.
Just last week, the FBI announced that it has a new suspect regarding the theft of Pelosi's laptop.
Like many J6 participants, Williams has spent an insane amount of time in prison while her lawyer argued that it truly felt like she was "guilty until proven innocent."
She was charged with six other charges, originally with the laptop theft, but was later acquitted of that particular charge.
"She was treated like she had stole the computer," Williams' attorney Lori Ulrich said.
"The government had every reason to believe soon after January 2021 she did not take the computer," Ulrich said. "But they never changed the narrative in the media."
The accusation comes after Harrisburg woman Riley Williams was previously charged with stealing the laptop, only to be acquitted of the charges related to the theft in March of 2023.https://t.co/6Gy7FMywto
— CBS 21 News (@CBS21NEWS) November 16, 2024
A local CBS affiliate noted:
The legal team acknowledged that Riley was inside the Capitol on January 6th and entered Speaker Pelosi's office, but they maintained a firm stance on the laptop charge.
The team spent hundreds of hours reviewing security tapes and CCTV from the Capitol riot, finding video proof that Williams left the office without Pelosi's computer.
"I saw her at the building on video," said investigator Matthew Schappell. "There were no indications that she had a laptop in her person, in her purse. Nothing to indicate she was carrying a laptop."
The media relentlessly attacked Williams even after she was acquitted of the laptop charge.
There was also a movement to have Williams released on a "compassionate release" condition from a "Covid infested" jail cell, but it never panned out.
The FBI named Kentucky man David Slinker as the new suspect in the theft of Pelosi's laptop.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A stunner being reported by the Christian Institute in the United Kingdom is that there may have been more than 400 possible criminal violations of the euthanasia law in Ontario, Canada, that have not been reported to police.
The report said Dirk Huyer, chief of the coroner's office in the province, responsible for flagging violations, has identified 428 "compliance problems" over just five years, including 178 in 2023 alone. But not one has been referred for police investigation.
Canada long has been at the forefront of allowing for and providing for the "voluntary" suicides by people who get their doctors' help.
The nation has reached the point that there have been instances in which people with serious medical needs are denied treatment, but instead have been recommended for euthanasia.
The report noted Huyer at a 2024 conference confirmed the 428 compliance issues, such as a refusal to consult with a medic with expertise in a patient's physical ailment.
It was the Macdonald–Laurier Institute, a public policy think tank, that said, "It has been distressing to learn that some authorities, well aware of non-compliance with the law, did not publicly report them."
In Canada, the law is called MAID, for medical assistance in dying.
University of Toronto law professor Trudo Lemmens said in the report, "Any violation of the MAID law, considering that it's a criminal law, should be reported to the police and to the College — as a matter of principle — and should certainly be investigated by an independent prosecutor."
He continued, "It's a serious issue. I mean, this is a criminal law and I'm worried that the lack of referring for prosecution and for investigation by the College of Physicians and Surgeons reflects a kind of normalization of MAID as some kind of inherent beneficial practice."
A report at the New Atlantis on the revelation said, "For years, there have been clear signals that euthanasia providers in Canada may be breaking the law and getting away with it. That is the finding of the officials who are responsible for monitoring euthanasia deaths to ensure compliance in the province of Ontario."
The report said the 400 plus cases in which there were possible violations have been concealed from the public.
No charges have been pursued, "even against repeat violators and 'blatant' offenders," the report said.
The requirements that have been violated include basics such as assessing whether people are eligible, upholding safeguards against abuse, and reporting requirements.
The report confirmed that private documents reveal between 2018 and 2024, "in presentations held behind closed doors and in reports that were nominally public but garnered little attention," Huyer has confirmed seeing "hundreds" of compliance problems.
The New Atlantis reported some of the problems dealt with victims "who may not have been capable of consent."
The article explained Huyer's office refused to refer, to prosecute, or even report to police.
"Whether or not these hundreds of 'issues' are in fact violations of criminal law is unclear precisely because none of them have been referred to law enforcement for investigation. Instead, Huyer's office has deemed virtually all of them as requiring nothing more than an 'informal conversation' with the practitioner or an 'educational' or 'notice' email. Even in one egregious case, in which the practitioner was found to have violated multiple legal requirements, and which Huyer himself described as 'just horrible,' his office reported the case only to a regulatory body instead of the police," the report said.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Child sex abuse has run rampant under the administration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
There's the entire industry that involves trafficking minors into America across the Democrat regime's open borders, and subjecting them to sex abuse.
Then there's the abuse that is part and parcel of the transgender ideology, where LGBT activists and some doctors line up to recommend, and do, surgical body mutilations on kids.
Now one component of the fight is impacting Apple, one of the nation's biggest companies, a company supported by the millions of smart phone and laptop customers it has.
It's a fight over the corporate decision there to remove a software function that was designed to "identify child sex abuse material."
It's the Alliance Defending Freedom that is calling on the SEC, through a letter, to deny Apple's attempt to exclude a shareholder resolution aimed at providing transparency into the decision to eliminate that option.
The software function was intended to identify child sex abuse materials – images – without actually having copies of those images downloaded.
The letter explains shareholders want Apple to explain its decision to discontinue its scanning system, "NeuraHash," which Verge.com said lets the company "check for exact matches of known child-abuse imagery without possessing any of the images or gleaning any information about non-matching pictures."
The ADF said the resolution was filed by the American Family Association and that organization has explained that "Apple's ineffective efforts to prevent child sex abuse material on its platforms have resulted in the company landing on the National Center for Sexual Exploitation's 'Dirty Dozen' list for the past two years."
Apple, instead of allowing shareholders to vote, wants the SEC to censor the request from its proxy ballot.
ADF lawyers want it to remain.
The ADF noted Apple got a score of just 5%, out of 100%, ADF's 2024 Viewpoint Diversity Score Business Index.
"Major corporations like Apple shouldn't be hiding from shareholders, especially when it comes to serious issues like guarding against child sex abuse material," said ADF spokesman Jeremy Tedesco. "There is simply no excuse for Apple to avoid this important topic. Apple needs to rebuild trust with its shareholders and clients, but that can't happen unless it answers basic questions about removing its own safeguard against child sex abuse material."
Apple claimed it should be exempted from the question because of a rule that deals with companies and their "ordinary business operations."
However, ADF said there are extraordinary concerns about "fiduciary and reputational risks" from Apple's decision.
The organization said it also is concerned about Apple's apparent contradiction between its statement that child sex abuse material is "a significant societal issue that needs to be addressed" with its attempt to evade shareholder transparency on the issue.
ADF's Michael Ross said, the company 'can't have it both ways."
"I'm confident that Apple agrees with its own shareholders about the importance of addressing and guarding against child sex abuse material. Unfortunately, Apple's actions don't seem to be lining up with their statements."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A judge in Athens, Georgia, Wednesday reached a verdict for Jose Ibarra, the illegal alien accused of murdering Augusta University student Laken Riley on the University of Georgia campus in February.
Despite pleading not guilty, the suspect was found guilty of all 10 counts, including one count of malice murder, three counts of felony murder, one count of kidnapping, one count of aggravated assault with intent to rape, one count of aggravated battery, one count of hindering a 9-1-1 emergency call, one count of tampering with evidence and one count of being a peeping Tom.
Crying from Riley's friends and family could be heard during the announcement of the verdict by Athens-Clarke County Superior Court Judge H. Patrick Haggard.
"Laken Riley herself has given you all the evidence you need alone to find this man guilty of every single count in this indictment," prosecutor Sheila Ross said Wednesday in her closing statement. "She did fight, and it is a direct result of that fight that gives you all the physical evidence you need to convict him."
"He killed her because she would not let him rape her."
DNA evidence was in important pat of the trial, as witnesses testified DNA matching Ibarra's was found in the young woman's fingernails and on a jacket with Riley's hair retrieved from a dumpster near his apartment.
"In order to find this defendant not guilty of killing Laken Riley, you would have to disbelieve DNA," Ross said. "You would have to disbelieve fingerprint evidence."
"That predator is inhuman and the epitome of evil," Laken's sister said. "Jose Antonio Ibarra has completely and utterly ruined my life."
The judge sentenced Ibarra to the maximum penalty, life in prison without the possibility of parole.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Members of Congress are demanding the Department of Justice inspector general review a case in which the U.S. Marshals Service pulled guns on an innocent woman, berated and screamed at her, arrested her, and jailed her overnight.
They had been looking for a different woman, but attacked Penny McCarthy in an incident that is on video reports now:
The letter demanding a review was sent to Inspector General Michael Horowitz by Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the head of the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., of the Subcommittee on Crime and Federal Government Surveillance.
"We are very concerned at both the USMS's carelessness and the excessive force during this encounter. The USMS's lack of regard for Ms. McCarthy's due process rights is very troubling and oversight is necessary to ensure similar abuses do not happen in the future. Part of the stated mission of the Department of Justice (DOJ) OIG is to 'review the programs and personnel' of the USMS," the letter said.
The members of Congress outlined the stunningly troubling facts at hand:
"On March 5, 2024, six United States Marshals Service (USMS) agents pulled into the driveway of 66-year-old Phoenix, Arizona resident Penny McCarthy with their guns drawn demanding that she 'get her hands up.' The USMS agents insisted that McCarthy was a fugitive who had violated probation in 1999 after committing several non-violent crimes. The agents threatened Ms. McCarthy and denied her an opportunity to prove her identity. While the USMS has initiated a review of this apparent misconduct, we write to request that the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) conduct a thorough and independent investigation of this incident," they wrote.
From publicly available information, it appears that the USMS violated Ms. McCarthy's constitutional rights during the arrest. After six agents surprised Ms. McCarthy at her home screaming at her to 'get her hands up,' she understandably asked if they had the right individual. At that point, the USMS agents screamed at her to 'tum around,' threatening her 'you're going to get hit.' Video footage shows that Ms. McCarthy cooperated during the encounter, despite threats of being tased. Ms. McCarthy asked to see proof that the agents were law enforcement but the agents denied her request. The agents insisted Ms. McCarthy was a nonviolent fugitive from Oklahoma named Carole Anne Rozak. Ms. McCarthy offered to provide proof she was not Ms. Rozak, but federal agents refused. The USMS booked Ms. McCarthy in federal prison overnight and she was released the next day. A federal judge subsequently dismissed the case shortly thereafter. The USMS only admitted its misidentification after a local news channel conducted a thorough investigation. The body camera footage was not released until six months after the incident through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Although the USMS claims it is conducting a review of the actions taken by their agents, an internal review is not enough.
The members of Congress cited the officers' "carelessness and the excessive force during this encounter."
The letter instructs, "Please confirm that you will examine this encounter as soon as possible but no later than December 2, 2024."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Leftists across the Washington, D.C., landscape are erupting in outrage, including at least one death threat on video, by a plan from a female lawmaker that would have men in Congress use restrooms and locker rooms designated for men.
And not the facilities provided for women.
The war has been sparked by the pending arrival of U.S. Rep. Sarah McBride, a Delaware Democrat, who was born Tim McBride but now styles himself as a woman.
"Sarah McBride doesn't get a say in this," Mace said. "This is a biological man trying to force himself into women's spaces, and I'm not going to tolerate."
Her plan would adjust House rules to prohibit men who say they are women from using women's bathrooms and other facilities on Capitol Hill.
House Speaker Mike Johnson admitted it's a brand new problem for Congress and then said it would be addressed "in deliberate fashion with member consensus on it, and we will accommodate the needs of every single person."
One transgender activist responded by threatening to brutally murder Mace in a online video.
"Congresswoman Nancy Mace, I hope that one day I do find you in that women's bathroom and I grab your ratty looking f***ing hair and drag your face down to the floor while I repeatedly bash and until the blood's everywhere and you're dead," the trans person said.
"Thank you. I hope that Nancy Mace received this message well. Kisses."
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said, "There's a man pretending to be a woman coming to Congress in January who expects to use the same restrooms as little girls visiting the Capitol. I consider it assault for a man to charge into places that are designated specifically for women. Restrooms are a place where women are vulnerable. It's mentally ill for a man to think he should be allowed there."
Mace has proposed a two-page resolution to limit House members, officers and employees to using single-sex facilities that correspond with their biological sex.
She suggested a House rules change could be possible, but without that she'll bring it up on the House floor.
She explains letting men into women's restrooms and more "jeopardizes the safety and dignity" of females in the Capitol complex.
Mace explained, "This is just the start. I want to make sure that no men are in women's private spaces. And it's not going to end here. This shouldn't be going on any federal property. If you're a school or an institution that gets government funding, this kind of thing should be banned."
CBS reported McBride responded by attacking "far right-wing extremists."
He said they were raising the issue because "they have no real solutions to what Americans are facing. We should be focused on bringing down the cost of housing, health care, and child care, not manufacturing culture wars."
Transgenderism repeatedly has taken the headlines since the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris administration made it one of the top priorities for American government, which now has imposed even on the world stage its ideological campaign.
Mace then noted that the "radical left" is "trying to erase women."
The Washington Examiner reported at least one Democrat lawmaker turned vulgar over the problem.
"I just don't understand why bathrooms are top of mind for [Mace]," Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., said. "But she wants to think about where a future member is gonna p— and s—* like I don't — I don't understand."
The social behavior campaign by the Democrats was front and center during the 2024 election, a landslide won by President-elect Donald Trump and Republican majorities in the U.S. Senate and House.
The report noted Trump criticized Vice President Kamala Harris in ads leading up to the election while multiple GOP lawmakers attacked their Democratic counterparts for supporting transgender athletes' participation in female sports.
There was no limit to the hate that was unleashed against Mace because of her plan, with the New Republican using words like "vile," a specialty magazine accusing her of "harassing" McBride, and another accusing her of picking "a fight."