This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Stacie Laughton, a man who was elected to the New Hampshire legislature as a woman multiple times and resigned multiple times, now is facing a potentially lengthy prison sentence after pleading guilty to the sexual exploitation of children.

Laughton, 41, a Democrat, had been arrested and charged in 2023 in a case where authorities alleged his "former intimate partner," a daycare worker named Lindsay Groves, "admitted" taking sexually explicit photographs of children at the center where she worked and sending them to Laughton.

The report said the sentence for Laughton could be up to 30 years.

The Gateway Pundit said Laughton was charged with sexual exploitation of children, aiding and abetting.

The Department of Justice announced, "According to the charging documents, a preliminary forensic review of Groves' cellphone allegedly revealed over 10,000 text messages between Laughton and Groves that included discussion about, and transfer of, explicit photographs that Groves had taken of children while employed at Creative Minds daycare – including at least four sexually explicit images of children who appear to be approximately three to five years old, as well as explicit descriptions of sex with each other and others, including children."

Groves also is facing various charges.

The DOJ's charges continued, "The charge of sexual exploitation of children provides for a sentence of at least 15 years and up to 30 years in prison, at least five years and up to a lifetime of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case."

Laughton's guilty plea came during a court appearance in Boston.

Social media responses included:

"Shocking."

"Sick."

"Ick."

"I was reliably told this doesn't happen."

And, 'Psychos."

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has decided to press criminal charges against a man who groped her while she was in the streets of Mexico City on Tuesday, Breitbart reported. Video of the event shows the alleged perpetrator casually slipping past her security and putting his hands on Sheinbaum.

The president announced her decision during a news conference on Wednesday. "I decided to file a complaint. This is something that I lived and it is something that women have to live with."

The brazen attack took place in broad daylight as Shainbaum made her way through the city for an event. The man can be seen at first putting his arm around her shoulder and nuzzling his neck before placing his hands on her breasts. A video of the incident was shared in a post to X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday.

Security Failure

The incident highlighted a troubling security issue for the president of Mexico that has far-reaching implications. Not only did the alleged perpetrator put his hands on her, but it took several seconds for anyone in her entourage to even speak to the unidentified man.

One of her assistants seemed to chastise the man, but that didn't stop him from trying to approach her a total of three times. What's more, this seems to be a pattern in the nation where top politicians are not kept safe, including Carlos Manzo, the mayor of Uruapan, Michoacán, who was shot to death on Saturday.

In his case, a gunman was again able to circumvent any security personnel and fire several shots at Manzo despite having 14 National Guardsmen supposedly protecting him as part of his security detail. This came after the mayor was reportedly going after criminals and the Mexican drug cartels in his city.

The brazen murder sparked off days of riots in Michoacán and in the state capital, Morelia, CNN reported. The demonstrators used the slogan "enough of abuses and omissions" as their rallying cry, though the protests eventually turned violent, with some people breaching the city's Government Palace.

It wasn't just Manzo's murder that whipped citizens into a frenzy. Just last month, Bernardo Bravo Manríquez, who was a citrus farmer in Apatzingán, was found dead after speaking out in favor of more security for the nation's agricultural workers.

Plea for Peace

Unfortunately, Manzo's murder happened as the politician was attempting to clean up crime in the city. His suspected killer is thought to be a teen between the ages of 17 and 19 and may have been part of Mexico's organized crime community, though it's unknown since the suspect was killed after the incident.

Manzo was likely targeted for cracking down on these types of crimes and was often seen in public wearing a bulletproof vest. "Any criminal you encounter who is armed and resists arrest or attacks citizens, if you detect them during operations, you must take them down; there should be no leniency with them," Manzo said in a video posted to social media in May.

He was also critical of the Mexican president, whom he claimed was too soft on crime, as Sheinbaum often pushed for "peace and justice" rather than punishment for criminals. Like many on the American left, Sheinbaum has sought to address crime problems by addressing their root causes, such as poverty and a lack of education.

Now Sheinbaum has experienced the lawlessness for herself and has decided to press charges. However, the problems go far beyond political assassinations or public attacks on female politicians, and she and others in the government seem at a loss for how to stop it.

The fact that the female leader of the country is not safe on the streets speaks volumes about the situation for average citizens. The nation has been struggling for decades to get crime under control, but it seems the drug cartels and organized crime rings have a hold that's a strong as ever.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced another strike on a suspected drug boat on Saturday that killed narcotics drug traffickers whom he compared to terrorists, Just the News reported. Hegseth posted a video of the strike, which he said was ordered by President Donald Trump and precipitated a strike this week, along with an official designation for such suspected criminals.

Hegseth took to X, formerly Twitter, to make the announcement. "Today, at the direction of President Trump, the Department of War carried out a lethal kinetic strike on another narco-trafficking vessel operated by a Designated Terrorist Organization (DTO) in the Caribbean," Hegseth wrote.

"This vessel—like EVERY OTHER—was known by our intelligence to be involved in illicit narcotics smuggling, was transiting along a known narco-trafficking route, and carrying narcotics. Three male narco-terrorists were aboard the vessel during the strike, which was conducted in international waters. All three terrorists were killed, and no U.S. forces were harmed in this strike. These narco-terrorists are bringing drugs to our shores to poison Americans at home—and they will not succeed. The Department will treat them EXACTLY how we treated Al-Qaeda. We will continue to track them, map them, hunt them, and kill them," Hegseth said.

New Strategy

According to CBS News, the Trump administration positioned the USS Gerald R. Ford strike group in the Caribbean to continue what it considers a vital mission. Saturday's move was the 15th such strike since September, but was by no means the last. These strikes are meant to stop the inflow of dangerous illicit drugs that kill Americans.

Of course, some members of Congress have slammed the president for not being more forthcoming about the strikes. On October 30, Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia complained about not being informed as the highest-ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. Even some Republicans are beginning to question the intelligence that is being used to justify the strikes.

There has been little information given, including how it is that the administration knows the people on the boats are drug traffickers. Amid these questions, Hegseth announced yet another strike this week. Hegseth again said that it was "at the direction of President Trump" that the strike occurred after "intelligence confirmed that the vessel was involved in illicit narcotics smuggling, transiting along a known narco-trafficking route, and carrying narcotics," Hegseth wrote.

"The strike was conducted in international waters in the Eastern Pacific. No U.S. forces were harmed in the strike, and two male narco-terrorists — who were aboard the vessel — were killed. We will find and terminate EVERY vessel with the intention of trafficking drugs to America to poison our citizens. Protecting the homeland is our TOP priority. NO cartel terrorist stands a chance against the American military," the Secretary of War noted.

Opposition

According to the New York Times, the Senate is expected to vote on a law that would bar Trump from making these unilateral military moves, including in Venezuela. Both parties believe that Trump is wrong to do so without consulting Congress or obtaining a vote.

The White House sent out a classified memo to Congress with information about the legal justification, but Democrats say that it falls short. "There’s nothing that was said that changed my mind that they are making illegal strikes," said Rep. Gregory W. Meeks of New York. The lawmaker is the leading Democrat on the Foreign Affairs Committee.

Meanwhile, Warner continues to question the administration's source of authority to launch these strikes. "Even if at some point there was authority, how long does this last?" Warner asked.

"There is no legal basis in any legal opinion that we have been discussing that addresses Venezuela in any shape," he added. Meanwhile, Trump continues to say that these actions and has given conflicting remarks about possible military intervention in Venezuela, though moving the USS Gerald R. Ford into the area has brought some 5,000 military personnel.

Trump is doing his best to keep America safe and put the drug traffickers on the run with proactive strikes against their main transportation pipeline. Whether Democrats like it or not, it appears to be within his rights to do that without consulting them.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Far-left Colorado,, where its state Supreme Court bench-sitters, all Democrats, wildly tried to exclude President Trump from the 2024 election ballot, has orchestrated a years-long war against a now-former county clerk who expressed concerns about the integrity of the election in 2020 and worked to preserve records.

Long has there been the suspicion that the Democrat state's actions against former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, now jailed on state counts, were "oriented more toward inflicting political pain than toward pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives."

Trump, in fact, has called for her to be freed.

Now a report at Just the News reveals the Department of Justice has asked the federal Bureau of Prisons to research paths for her to be transferred out of state custody and into a federal facility.

The report said the office of Deputy Attorney General, led by Todd Blanche, has dispatched an email to Bureau of Prisons Director William Marshall, calling on the BOP to do the necessary research.

"At the request of the Deputy Attorney General, please have the Bureau of Prisons explore any and all avenues within BOP's authority to seek and request the transfer of Ms. Tina Peters from the Colorado Department of Corrections to a federal BOP facility," the DOJ instructed.

"We ask that BOP send out a request to Colorado as soon as possible and that BOP begin preparations for any possible transfer into federal custody."

In a trial clouded by the comments and behavior of a state judge, Peters was convicted last year on multiple counts linked to an alleged election security breach after 2020's vote.

She was given nine years in jail, despite the fact her security "breach" was completely overshadowed by a similar "breach" committed by Democrat Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, who was found to have posted pages and pages of election systems security passwords online, and was given no punishment whatsoever.

Trump, just weeks ago, said, "FREE TINA PETERS, a brave and innocent Patriot who has been tortured by crooked Colorado politicians, including the big Mail-In Ballot supporting the governor of the State.Let Tina Peters out of jail, RIGHT NOW. She did nothing wrong, except catching the Democrats cheat in the Election. She is an old woman, and very sick. If she is not released, I am going to take harsh measures!!!"

In fact, Colorado now is controlled by leftist extremists, from the office of homosexual Jared Polis to an all-Democrat state Supreme Court, and Democrat-majority bodies in the legislature.

Of course, evidence of vast levels of serious misbehavior remains in the state, and not just in the halls of state government in Denver. Records show the sheriff's office in one foothills county, Gilpin, had to pay out $700,000 some years ago for maintaining in official records references to a black resident as "N—– Roy." And Todd Vriesman, a state judge in that same county, recently had a case overturned because he violated the U.S. Constitution by clearing his courtroom out and sealing the doors, thereby depriving a defendant of a public trial.

The judge in Peters' case, Matthew Barrett, also made extra-judicial comments such as "you are a charlatan."

Trump several times has addressed, and opposed, the "weaponization" of the law enforcement and judiciary against him and his supporters.

Attorney General Pam Bondi already has established a group to review the "weaponization" actions under Barack Obama and Joe Biden, "to identify instances where a department's or agency's conduct appears to have been designed to achieve political objectives or other improper aims rather than pursuing justice or legitimate governmental objectives."

Peters has appealed her case and she filed a federal application for a writ of habeas corpus.

The DOJ previously had filed a statement of interest in her case, which said, "Tina Peters has sought relief in this action through an Application filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The United States respectfully submits this Statement of Interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 517. Ms. Peters is currently incarcerated while pursuing a direct appeal of her underlying nonviolent convictions and combined nine-year sentence. The Application explains that Ms. Peters suffers from serious health issues and that, while incarcerated, her physical and mental health have deteriorated. Reasonable concerns have been raised about various aspects of Ms. Peters' case."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

A "democrat socialist" politician, supporting much the same agenda as communism demands, was elected to be the next mayor of New York City, and Zohran Mamdani used his victory speech to threaten President Donald Trump.

That may not go well.

"Yeah, I thought it was a very angry speech, certainly angry toward me. I think he should be very nice to me. I'm the one that has to approve a lot of things coming to him, so he's off to a bad start," Trump said during an interview with Fox.

Mamdani had boasted, "So hear me, President Trump, when I say this: to get to any of us, you will have to get through all of us."

The Gateway Pundit explained Trump also pointed out, "You talk about danger. I think it's a very dangerous statement for him to make. He has to be a little bit respectful of Washington. Because if he's not he doesn't have a chance of succeeding."

Trump spent much of his business career in New York, creating buildings, boosting the economy and providing jobs.

The president said, "I'm so torn because I would like to see the new mayor do well because I love New York. I really love New York. When I left New York for Washington, New York was doing really well, but there were some bad signs. The bad sign was a guy named De Blasio. So, the signs of De Blasio—that was the beginning, and it was bad."

He continued, "This one, we're going to look— for a thousand years, communism has not worked. Communism, or the concept of communism, has not worked. I tend to doubt it's going to work this time."

Mamdani, in fact, has talked about his extremism, including such concepts as taking the means of production, having the government run grocery stores, and more. Within hours of his election, he was demanding people send him more money, and he's openly talked about massive tax hikes.

A Democratic congressman based in Chicago has been accused of distorting the facts about an arrest of an illegal immigrant at a daycare facility, Breitbart reported.

Democratic Rep. Mike Quigley claimed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) stormed into the school and "took a preschool teacher without a warrant IN FRONT OF CHILDREN."

A viral video of the incident showed agents dragging a woman outside of a school that teaches kids Spanish.

The short clip might lead viewers to conclude that Quigley's account is true - but according to the DHS, this is another example of Democrats omitting context to paint illegal aliens as victims.

DHS provides context

In a post on X, the official Department of Homeland Security account accused Quigley of "deliberately misrepresenting" the facts. The woman, a Colombian national who entered the U.S. illegally in 2023, had "fled inside" the school after officers attempted a targeted traffic stop, the agency said.

She was in a car with a male driver who refused to pull over when officers put on their lights and sirens. Video of the incident shows a silver car parked illegally in front of the school, seemingly backing up ICE's account.

The school was not targeted, DHS emphasized, and the arrest took place inside an entryway, not the school itself. Upon arrest, the woman "lied about her identity" and claimed she did not know the male driver of the vehicle, which was registered in her name. She said she had "picked him up from a bus stop."

"Officers attempted to pull over this vehicle, which was registered to a female illegal alien, with sirens and emergency lights, but the male driver refused to pull the vehicle over,” spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin wrote. "Law enforcement pursued the vehicle before the assailant sped into a shopping plaza where he and the female passenger fled the vehicle," the DHS said.

Congressman doubles down

Of course, Democrats tell a different story. They say the woman is just a teacher who is loved by the community.

That could be true, and it still would not give her a right to remain in the country illegally. Neither does her having a work permit, as the DHS pointed out.

"Work authorization does NOT confer any type of legal status to be in the U.S." the agency said. "The illegal alien's work authorization was approved by the Biden administration, which exploited this loophole to help facilitate the invasion of our country."

The DHS also accused the woman of endangering children, saying she encouraged her two teenage kids to cross the southern border unaccompanied, and smugglers may have been involved.

Quigley responded to the DHS's account by simply writing. "They're lying." He did not elaborate.

Democrats insist that Trump's immigration crackdown has gone too far - but if that is the case, why do Democrats need to keep lying about it?

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Just four days after President Trump warned of U.S. military action in Nigeria with "guns-a-blazing" over the killing of Christians, the commander in chief on Wednesday issued a video statement amplifying his threat, as he stressed, "The killing of Christians is not going to happen."

"Christianity is facing an existential threat in Nigeria. Thousands and thousands of Christians are being killed," Trump said. "Radical Islamists are responsible for this mass slaughter. I am hereby making Nigeria a country of particular concern, that's a legal definition.

"When the Christians or any such group is slaughtered like is happening in Nigeria – 3,100 vs. 4,476 worldwide, what horrible numbers – something has to be done."

The president continued: "I am asking Congressman Riley Moore together with Chairman Tom Cole and the House Appropriations Committee to immediately look into this matter and to report back to me – and I mean, like, immediately.

"The United States cannot stand by while such atrocities are happening in Nigeria and numerous other countries. It's not only Nigeria, it's all over. We stand ready, willing and able to save our great Christian population around the world. This is not going to happen. The killing of Christians is not going to happen."

The official designation for Nigeria came last Friday, and on Saturday the president went public with the military warning.

"If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, 'guns-a-blazing,' to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities," Trump said.

"I am hereby instructing our Department of War to prepare for possible action. If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our CHERISHED Christians! WARNING: THE NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT BETTER MOVE FAST!"

Pop star Nicki Minaj has already expressed her gratitude to Trump for highlighting the plight of Nigerian Christians.

"Reading [the president's statement] made me feel a deep sense of gratitude," wrote Minaj.

"We live in a country where we can freely worship God. No group should ever be persecuted for practicing their religion. We don't have to share the same beliefs in order for us to respect each other.

"Numerous countries all around the world are being affected by this horror & it's dangerous to pretend we don't notice.

"Thank you to the president and his team for taking this seriously. God bless every persecuted Christian. Let's remember to lift them up in prayer."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

With the federal government shutdown in Day 36, another black woman has posted an unnerving video online demonstrating how easy it is to steal groceries from a supermarket in a white neighborhood.

This comes on the heels of other women urging folks to steal at will, and one even threatening to hunt down, roast and eat white people if government assistance is taken away.

The latest case involves a TikToker with a username of @estherrenee, who recorded herself in an H-E-B supermarket she says is between 10 and 30 minutes from her home.

"I'm gonna show y'all if you don't get y'all EBT (electronic benefit transfer) what to do," the woman begins. "Y'all think because, for some reason that they watchin' y'all. They not watching y'all. They don't care. White people is not paying attention to y'all."

"I'm in the white neighborhood at their H-E-B, and I'm gonna walk out with my groceries. Easy peasy. Nobody's looking at me. Nobody's paying attention to me. I got my basket full of stuff and I'm just gonna walk out."

"So if they're taking y'all's EBT, just go to the white neighborhood and get a basket full of groceries just like I did."

During her entire video as she strolls through the market and into the parking lot without being stopped or questioned, she displays a visual message indicating: "White people are not paying attention to you."

"She basically recorded her own evidence to be arrested," wrote one commenter.

Others stated:

"Filming yourself stealing goes beyond bold. Stores need to start checking those receipts before you exit. Should be a waste of Human Resources but when margins and risks dictate then it will happen. Theft plain and simple."

"Rallying followers to steal from entire neighborhoods is mob recruitment, not activism. That's a felony pitch, not a social statement. Report it. Prosecute it. Move on."

"Usually they say white people follow them around like they're criminals and going to steal something. And apparently they are. But here she claims white people don't notice."

"And that my friends, is exactly how you destroy a high trust society. Welcome to the new world where everyone just does whatever is right in their own eyes."

As WorldNetDaily reported last week, another woman claiming she was out of food stamps bragged online about stealing from a grocery store while urging others to steal at will and "infiltrate" churches to get cash.

The woman who goes by "consiracycutiee" and has a username of @jaalagotanattitude posted her illegal shoplifting exploits on social media, using extremely graphic language.

"Everything out here is yours," she said. "Whether or not you take it, they call that sh** free will. I call that sh** eminent domain. You know what I'm saying? One thing I learned from the white men: Take it!"

"I don't give a f*** who's already sitting there. I don't give a f*** if your land was already established. B*tch, it's mine now, and I want it. That is what we should be preaching in the land to the f***ing masses.

"Act more like a white man. Take it for yourself, b*tch, and you won't be worried about who don't got it. You see what I'm saying? Get out there and ravish!"

"Last but not least, go into that church and infiltrate. Don't be stupid. Get in there. Ask them for some rent money. Ask them for some help. You've been tithing. Say your lights is off. You need a stipend. You need some food. Go to the church."

Also last week, as WND reported, another black woman threatened to hunt down, roast and eat white Americans, and another threatening to kill anyone who tries to stop looting.

She addressed "the white man" in the U.S., saying: "I'm here to let you know that we are going to eat regardless even if we have to hunt you animals down and roast and eat you, the delectable crackers and cheese.

"We will make it happen if we have to, trust and believe me. And if it takes this government shutdown for black people to finally come from under the government and understand that we don't need to be paying our taxes into this government.

"What we really need to be doing is taking care of one another, buying land and growing our own food and building our own nation. If this government shutdown and starvation is what it's going to take, then let the party begin. It's black power, baby, and we rise."

There is one black woman who is fiercely condemning the recent videos encouraging theft.

She is Megan McGlover, author of "Tell the Truth," who posted her own video addressing the matter.

"You been stealing, whore! You been stealing," McGlover says. "We not gonna talk about every time I turn around and look on the internet, y'all stealing in Walmart, you're stealing in Walgreens, you're stealing in CVS. You're stealing everywhere. What is you talking about? That ain't no threat."

"You done make a whole career out of stealing. At this point, you should be in retirement. You should be looking to retire from your stealing career. Ain't nobody afraid of you, talking about you gonna go steal."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

When the Joe Biden administration spied on Republican senators, what information was collected?

Who authorized it?

What was the political ideology behind the scheme?

These questions are more are now the subject of a new Freedom of Information Act demand that insists on the release of "every record" related to the Democrats' spy-on-Republicans agenda.

"Backed by leading U.S. senators, the ACLJ is spearheading a historic effort to restore justice in American," explained the American Center for Law and justice. "Those senators standing alongside the ACLJ include Lindsey Graham (SC), Ted Cruz (TX), Marsha Blackburn (TN), Cynthia Lummis (WY), Bill Hagerty (TN), and Tommy Tuberville (AL)."

All are supporting the demands, the ACLJ said.

The action is a result of some of the recent revelations about the scandalous behavior on the part of the Biden administration and its special counsel, Jack Smith, who now also is being investigated.

"The American people deserve answers. Every day it becomes clearer that this wasn't a legitimate investigation – it was a massive and politically motivated fishing expedition," the legal team explained.

"We recently learned that Smith abused his prosecutorial power to spy on at least eight sitting U.S. senators and hundreds of prominent conservatives and groups. He unconstitutionally subpoenaed the phone records of these senators, including some of the most vocal defenders of liberty and due process in Washington, in the Arctic Frost investigation he took over from the FBI," the ACLJ said by way of background.

"When the executive branch spies on the legislative branch, it not only threatens the constitutional separation of powers, but it also confirms that the Biden-Garland Justice Department was weaponizing the government and targeting political opponents under the guise of law enforcement. This is not oversight. It's overreach."

The organization said, "Those responsible for this unconstitutional attack on liberty must be held accountable. At the ACLJ, we've seen what happens when unchecked power is allowed to fester. We fought and won FOIA battles against the Biden DOJ. Now, we're going to do everything we can to help the Trump administration, along with the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, expose what Jack Smith did during Arctic Frost.

"If they can spy on sitting U.S. Senators, they will spy on you."

The scheme assembled by Democrats under Barack Obama and Joe Biden first tried to falsely link Trump to Russia, using made-up claims sponsored by Hillary Clinton. Then the Democrats launched a series of lawfare cases against Trump and other Republicans, and used Arctic Frost to spy on their constitutionally protected statements and comments.

It was FBI chiefs Kash Patel and Dan Bongino who confirmed that Smith "was tracking the private communication of 8 GOP U.S. senators."

Online commentary has suggested Smith was scheming to file more lawfare cases against Trump and Republicans had Kamala Harris won the White House, and accessing their communications records was a preliminary step in naming them in charges.

Harris, of course, lost by landslide proportions in the popular vote and the Electoral College.

Explained the ACLJ, "So not only was the Deep State going after President Trump, but it was going after conservative members of Congress. Such a shocking revelation should be the top headline on every mainstream media outlet. It should also put Congress on high alert that a Special Counsel was going after them."

ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow called the scenario out "outrage."

"I want everybody to put this into context. Could you imagine if it were a different situation and the DOJ under President Trump was spying on six Democratic senators? What would the reaction be? . . . Why in the world did Jack Smith try to get the phone records of a co-equal branch of government – senators and a member of the House of Representatives – for what purpose?"

He said, "This action by Jack Smith just typifies what was going on with the weaponization of the DOJ."

And since the records were accessed just before the 2024 election, "Obviously, Smith and the Biden DOJ were engaging in election interference."

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Multiple radicals have unleashed their violence on American university campuses this week, and whether it's part of the leftist agenda that put Muslim "democratic socialist" Zohran Mamdani into the office of New York City's mayor or not, it's causing alarm.

In both cases students displayed hatred and vulgar language (be forewarned about videos) and attacked conservative expressions simply because the statements were being made.

One was at what apparently was a Steven Crowder event at the University of Oklahoma.

Caught taking down signs about the event, the unidentified girl swatted a phone from a man's hand, suggested obscene actions and more.

Online were dozens of calls for her arrest and expulsion.

One said, "She needs to learn that she can't assault people and have zero consequences. If she does not get taught this lesson she will do it again. Every time she does it and there are no consequences it is a green light that it is ok and to escalate."

And, "Wow! She needs an intervention."

And, "These are the people that vote for a communist in New York."

Another message asked the school for a comment.

Constitutional expert Jonathan Turley highlighted the other situation, at Oklahoma State, where a radical insisted she had the right to shut up anyone with a message she dislikes.

"You don't deserve a conversation," she said.

Turley said it was a "student" that was "trashing" a table at the Young America's Foundation event.

The students had set up a table to support traditional marriage.

The radical student then "tossed their material and claimed the absolute right to vandalize opposing views on campus," he wrote.

"Notably, one of the students involved in the attacks insisted that only the government is prevented from trashing such tables and, as a private citizen, she had a right to do so. The sense of license to do so has been drilled into these students by both educational and political figures. This is a face of rage."

He said in this situation, like the other, the question is what will the university do about the attack.

"This type of political violence or vandalism should be anathema to an institution of higher education. This is not free speech, as the student claims. It is the denial of the exercise of free speech. The student has every right to set up her own table or protest the YAF. What she is not allowed to do is attack other students or their displays.

Patriot News Alerts delivers timely news and analysis on U.S. politics, government, and current events, helping readers stay informed with clear reporting and principled commentary.
© 2026 - Patriot News Alerts