This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Many schools across America now are under the influence of leftist administrators, anti-faith teachers' unions, anti-Christian teachers.
And the schools' actions reflect the personal ideologies and religious beliefs, or non-beliefs, of their faculty and managers.
But the American Center for Law and Justice has come across one that has gone to extremes.
It ripped down posters for being too Christian, it ordered a student club to discontinue using the "Good News" name, it ordered censorship of well-known Bible verses and a cross image, it demanded access to planned promotions to determine "whether they were too religious," it banned an entire video series planned by the club, and tore down posters a second time.
"School officials took over and started running the club, insisting on what religious materials were and were not acceptable," the ACLJ reported. "This is viewpoint discrimination in its purest form – and it's unlawful."
The organization explained it has dispatched a demand letter, often a precursor to a lawsuit, to the school as it defends "the constitutional rights of a high school student in New York whose Christian beliefs and religious expression have been repeatedly blocked by school officials."
The organization cited violations of both the First Amendment and the Equal Access Act.
"We are representing a family whose daughter, Jenna, a ninth-grade student at Carmel High School, was denied her right to express her Christian faith and conduct a student Bible club – something countless other students at the school are freely allowed to do. Jenna's only 'offense' was her desire to encourage her peers and share the hope of her faith. For that, school officials took extreme measures to silence her," the ACLJ reported.
"After persistent efforts to gain approval for her faith-based group, Jenna finally received permission to form her club. But her constitutional struggle was far from over. To kick off the Bible club, she created simple posters that announced the club's upcoming meeting. The posters included a welcoming message, a handful of well-known Bible verses, a cross, and an invitation for all students – something Jenna herself feels strongly about – to attend and be encouraged by the words of Jesus. Still, school officials removed the posters from the hallways."
They explained she used "too many Bible verses." And they told her the club could not be the "Good News Club."
"Her posters were censored because they were Christian, and she had her religious messages removed. School officials went as far as insisting on reviewing her posters to determine whether they were too religious," the legal team explained.
Even after she met every demand from the school, officials there decided to "double down."
"When her group decided to show a faith-based video series meant to strengthen students in their personal battles of the mind and spirit – her new posters were again torn down. This time, administrators went even further, banning the entire video series from being shown, citing vague 'complaints' about the religious content," the report said.
Then the school officials demanded to decide "what religious materials were and were not acceptable."
The ACLJ pointed out the U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed students' rights to have Bible clubs. It fought and won the Board of Education v. Mergens precedent more than three decades ago.
The student is protected under both of the federal precedents, and "The law is clear: School officials cannot censor religious speech simply because others might disagree with it," the report said.
What the school needs to do is end its "unconstitutional suppression of this student's rights and provide written assurances that Jenna and her peers may meet and express their religious views without interference. If the district refuses, we are fully prepared to file a lawsuit," the ACLJ said.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
"Show me the man, I'll find you the crime!" So said Lavrenty Beria, the notorious chief of the secret police under the Soviet Union's long-time and epically ruthless leader, Josef Stalin.
What that meant, of course, was that any person regarded as a genuine threat to the communist dictatorship would be tried in a kangaroo court on serious but totally made-up crimes. As the Encyclopedia Britannica puts it: "In high-profile, carefully scripted purge trials, perceived political opponents of the government were convicted of heinous offenses that they had not committed."
In today's America, the parallels are both eerie and inescapable.
Remember, after all, that the Democratic Party has embraced not only socialism and the bizarre neo-Marxist religion of "wokeism," but straight-up pathological delusion – everything from championing "transgender" men destroying women's athletics and invading their locker rooms, to intentionally engineering a full-scale invasion of America by foreign gangbangers, sex traffickers and criminals, including thousands of convicted murderers and rapists.
So corrupt and delusional has today's Democratic Party become that, for the first time in history, a major political party pushed a man with obvious dementia (who also happened to be head of a de facto crime family) into the White House as a puppet president, all the while secretly controlling him – and therefore the country – via a hidden "politburo" of puppet-string pullers.
It is this deranged and shockingly corrupt political party that in recent times has been using the judiciary to advance an unholy and catastrophic agenda – first, by following Beria's example of "finding the crime" to fit "the man," in this case President Donald J. Trump.
However, despite the absurdly political wall-to-wall prosecutions of Trump throughout the Biden presidency – after all, in just a short period of time he was suddenly indicted for nearly 100 different crimes! – the "purge trials" ultimately came to naught, with the judges and prosecutors, one by one, being exposed as ridiculously partisan, and sometimes flat-out corrupt, pawns in the Deep State's war against Donald Trump, whom they delight in mocking as "a convicted felon!"
But then, after Trump's stunning electoral-landslide reelection victory in November 2024 and the breathtakingly rapid rollout of his promised and much-needed reforms starting on Inauguration Day, the judicial attacks on Trump assumed a new and different form: Now left-leaning judges across the land would ignore their oaths of office, the clear intent of the law and the constitutional separation of powers, and instead fixate on undermining and blocking at every turn the pro-America agenda of the democratically elected president of the United States.
Indeed, many top legal analysts say what is happening in America right now constitutes nothing short of an attempted judicial coup d'etat.
But why, one might ask, would judges be the new warriors dedicated to stopping Trump?
Consider that when Trump won the 2024 election, the Republican Party also captured both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Finally, most voters assumed, Team Trump had the power, authority and congressional backing to implement much-needed changes and "make America great again." After all, that's how the nation's system has always worked.
But wait.
What if the judiciary, the remaining constitutional branch of America's unique tripartite government, took on a new role – of undermining and overruling the president?
As it turned out, the same judiciary that disgraced itself with all the idiotically corrupt, wall-to-wall lawfare attacks against Donald Trump throughout the Biden administration has been only too willing to do its part to stop Trump at any cost now, be it legal or illegal, moral or immoral, sane or – as the reader will discover in this issue of Whistleblower – insane.
To describe the game plan simply: If you don't like something President Trump is doing, just file a lawsuit with any one of thousands of judges, making sure to pick one who dislikes Trump and his policies. And then suddenly, one local judge – deliberating in his or her little jurisdiction in one of 50 sovereign states – writes something on a piece of paper and magically overrules the overwhelmingly elected and constitutionally empowered president of the United States.
Hundreds of such lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration in the last few months, attempting to reverse multiple common-sense policies overwhelmingly supported by Americans – most notably, Trump's efforts to deport illegal-alien criminals, gang members and terrorists.
The drama has sometimes reached almost comical heights, with one jurist – James Boasberg, the chief judge of the United States District Court in Washington, D.C. – actually ordering planes carrying Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador to turn around mid-flight and bring back those criminals to the U.S.! Fortunately, the Trump administration did not comply, and Judge Boasberg is now facing a motion for impeachment from the House of Representatives. But then there's Judge Hannah Dugan in Wisconsin, as well as Judge Joel Cano in New Mexico, both arrested by the FBI in late April for allegedly harboring illegal-alien gang members!
There is an unmistakably surreal element to the current judicial insurrection: Who are these people? The executive and legislative branches of government are very public, their representatives profiled and interviewed daily online, on television and in print. In stark contrast, the judicial branch of government – both its members and its workings – remain largely invisible.
The mask is ripped off in the powerful June issue of WND's acclaimed Whistleblower magazine, titled "JUDICIAL INSURRECTION: How rogue judges have gone to war with Trump, the Constitution and America."
Issue highlights include:
* "Judicial insurrection" by David Kupelian
* "From 'We the people' to 'We the judges'? Thomas Jefferson declared, 'The Constitution is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary'" by Jerry Newcombe
* "'IT IS AN INSURRECTION!' Watch Mark Levin flay radical left judges: 'They know they're abusing their power. They're issuing these national injunctions to cripple the Executive Branch, to overturn the results of an election'"
* "The judges who would be kings: 'Democrats are hoping that hundreds of legal bee stings will bring down the elephant'" by Robert Knight
* "'Criminal contempt': Federal judge threatened Trump for deporting illegal aliens: But no worries, Boasberg said the president could 'clear' the case by returning the deported murderers and rapists to America"
* "'Another activist judge is protecting criminal illegal immigrant monsters'": Trump White House details one of many examples of out-of-control judges trying to overthrow the president
* "Gingrich: America is experiencing 'potentially a judicial coup d'etat': Troubled by 'the Judicial Branch's effort to fully override the Legislative and Executive branches'"
* "From lawfare to judicial coup d'etat: Why the 'Deep State' hates, fears and persecutes President Donald Trump" by David Kupelian
* "AG Pam Bondi warns judges who are subverting Trump's border security agenda by illegally protecting criminal suspects" by Bob Unruh
* "Supreme Court justice's agenda to 'fight' Trump betrays evidence of 'judicial overreach': 'The role of a judge is to zealously advocate for the Constitution,' not side with every leftwing cause" by Bob Unruh
* "Pollster: 4 in 5 self-described 'liberals' want Elon Musk cast into prison: 'According to Democrats, anyone who wants to cut insane levels of spending, debt, waste and looting of taxpayer money is a criminal who should be arrested and sent to prison'" by Wayne Allyn Root
* "Judge who housed suspected Tren de Aragua terror gang member booted … permanently! State Supreme Court rules he 'can never hold a judicial office again'" by Bob Unruh
* "Obama judge bars DOGE from accessing Social Security systems" by Cristina Laila
* "Biden-appointed judge demands schools keep offering obscene books to kids: Blocked state law banning material 'with descriptions or visual depictions of a sex act'" by Jaryn Crouson
* "Lesbian judge blocks school board from removing sexually explicit books, saying it's unconstitutional to follow 'conservative values': 'The court viewed any decision motivated by conservative values as unacceptable and partisan' by Tyler O'Neil
* "Judge blocks Trump from ending legal status for 530,000 illegal aliens Biden brought in. Ruling claims program created by executive order can't be altered by executive order" by Virginia Allen
* "'Cruelly imprisoning': Trump moves to help 'innocent' Gold Star grandmother jailed by Colorado Democrats: Orders DOJ to 'take all necessary action' to secure release of 'hostage'" by Bob Unruh
* "Why Democrats want to gut the Supreme Court: 'Judicial activism – judges coming up with desired results by twisting the Constitution to their desired end'" by Jerry Newcombe
* "DeSantis offers simple solution to stop leftwing activist judges from undermining Trump"
* "The judicial 'resistance' is setting itself up for humiliation: The entire notion of a 'nationwide injunction' is oxymoronic" by Josh Hammer
* "The left's secret lawfare playbook exposed": Elizabeth Farah interview with Will Chamberlain, senior counsel at the Article III Project.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
ABC News has confirmed a decision not to renew the contract of now ex-Senior National Correspondent Terry Moran after he launched an enraged rant against an official in the Trump administration.
Moran had been suspended over the weekend when his diatribe appeared.
Moran claimed, "The thing about Stephen Miller is not that he is the brains behind Trumpism. Yes, he is one of the people who conceptualizes the impulses of the Trumpist movement and translates them into policy. But that's not what's interesting about Miller. It's not brains. It's bile. Miller is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred. He's a world-class hater. You can see this just by looking at him."
Miller responded with a charge that "Terry pulled off his mask" to reveal, in his meltdown, "the corporate press in America."
It was the Washington Examiner that said ABC "reportedly announced" it will not renew.
ABC said, "At ABC News, we hold all of our reporters to the highest standards of objectivity, fairness and professionalism, and we remain committed to delivering straightforward, trusted journalism."
Former President Barack Obama has been unusually quiet as the left mounts its resistance against President Donald Trump, The Atlantic reported. Staff writer and book author Mark Leibovich believes the former leader is just what the Democratic Party needs to reverse its decline.
The left can't seem to let go of the past. Whether it's failed candidates like Hillary Clinton and Stacy Abrams or their previous winners like Obama, they believe recycling the same politicians is the key to future success.
Liebovich was almost begging Obama to return to the forefront of politics in his essay "Where Is Barack Obama?" published Sunday. He demonstrated no awareness that Obama was part of the problem Democrats face today.
"Trump has begun his second term with a continuous spree of democracy-shaking, economy-quaking, norm-obliterating action. And Obama, true to form, has remained carefully above it all," Liebovich gushed.
The author hit the usual talking points about Trump to make the case for a more prominent role for Obama in the public discourse these days. While he acknowledges that Obama hasn't been completely missing in action, he believes the former president isn't doing enough.
"No matter how brazen Trump becomes, the most effective communicator in the Democratic Party continues to opt for minimal communication. His 'audacity of hope' presidency has given way to the fierce lethargy of semi-retirement," Liebovich charged.
While Obama pops up for serious reasons every now and then, he also seems to revel in more cushy cultural roles like his "summer and year-end book, music, and film recommendations." The author sees this as unacceptable in light of Trump's presidency.
"In normal times, no one would deny Obama these diversions. He performed the world’s most stressful job for eight years, served his country, made his history, and deserved to kick back and do the usual ex-president things: start a foundation, build a library, make unspeakable amounts of money," Liebovich contends.
"But the inevitable Trump-era counterpoint is that these are not normal times. And Obama’s detachment feels jarringly incongruous with the desperation of his longtime admirers—even more so given Trump’s assaults on what Obama achieved in office," he added.
Liebovich mentions Obama's one contribution to the 2024 presidential election, which was convincing then-President Joe Biden to give up his reelection bid. The author downplays the implications of the Democrats' loss in relation to Obama's continued popularity.
"Obama did insert himself in the 2024 election, reportedly taking an aggressive behind-the-scenes role last summer in trying to nudge Biden out of the race. He delivered a showstopper speech at the Democratic National Convention and campaigned several times for Kamala Harris in the fall," Liebovich claimed.
However, the truth is that Obama just couldn't push Biden or then-Vice President Kamala Harris, his replacement, over the finish line. If Obama were the oracle Liebovich makes him out to be, it would have been an easy win for either Democrat.
The author closes with a fantasy scenario where Obama would steal Trump's thunder during the June 14 parade in Washington, D.C., to celebrate the Army’s 250th anniversary. "Few things would fire up Democrats like a head-to-head matchup between Trump and Obama," Liebovich added.
What Democrats fail to realize is that Obama's popularity was never as universal as they made it out to be, and handwringing over his diminished role is a waste of time. Perhaps Obama is trying to preserve his legacy by lying low while the party implodes under its own weight.
Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX), who was director of the White House Medical Unit (WHMU) under Presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump, said that while he supervised Joe Biden's White House physician Kevin O'Connor, that O'Connor engaged in sexual misconduct on numerous occasions.
Jackson explained that he had to sign O'Connor's fitness and job evaluations while he was then-Vice President Biden's doctor.
He said he thought about getting rid of O'Connor for a number of reasons, including sexual misconduct he witnessed on the job.
“One was because of some very inappropriate behavior on his part,” Jackson stated.
Jackson then said that O'Connor would ask people he just met for their cell phones, then put them down his pants in his groin area before giving them back.
He also made "immature" jokes that offended women in the office, Jackson said.
“Sexually inappropriate comments and little things, like he used to think it was very funny,” Jackson explained.
He said that he didn't try to get rid of O'Connor because he believed Obama or Biden would order him to rehire the man despite his conduct.
"Of course the Bidens loved it,” Jackson said. “Joe Biden probably is cut from the same cloth in that regard.”
Jackson said that Obama never ordered him not to fire O'Connor, he just assumed that it wouldn't go over well.
The behavior should have been regarded as all the more inappropriate due to O'Connor's position as a service member, Jackosn said.
“Being an active-duty military officer, like I was — and mind you, like he was, he was an Army colonel — those are things that the military would have deemed highly inappropriate.”
The conversation came about after O'Connor came under scrutiny for having claimed that Biden was functioning well cognitiviely, even while most of the American public could see otherwise.
President Trump was greeted by an adoring crowd at the Prudential Center on Saturday as he walked into the arena to watch UFC 316 - in a spectacle that was sure to leave Democrats, and former ally Elon Musk, fuming with envy.
The crowd roared with chants of "USA!" as Trump - joined by longtime backer and UFC CEO Dana White - made an epic entrance to "American Badass" by Kid Rock.
As he made his way to his ringside seat, Trump showed love to the crowd, shaking hands with ordinary spectators - as well as famous names like boxing great Mike Tyson.
Trump appears at UFC events regularly, and he never fails to get an enthusiastic response from fans and fighters alike.
The Donald was joined Saturday by family and members of his administration, including Eric Trump, Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and interim U.S Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba. Trump shared a fist-bump with Rubio, who is seen as one of the most favored members of Trump's administration.
Trump also joined Kayla Harrison in celebrating her UFC title, with Harrison letting Trump wear the gold belt in a lighthearted moment.
President Trump rocks UFC gold belt from champ Kayla Harrison. pic.twitter.com/sGqnP2GVbB
— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) June 8, 2025
Notably absent from Trump's entourage was Elon Musk, who spent the previous week flaming Trump on social media, including with baseless accusations tying Trump to Jeffrey Epstein.
Musk attended Trump's previous UFC event in April, when their "bromance" was still going strong.
In an interview Saturday, Trump said he believes his relationship with Musk is over as he warned his former benefactor of "very serious consequences" for supporting Democrats.
Despite the bruising feud, Trump did not appear to have a care in the world as he entered the arena in Newark to a sincere display of affection.
Democrats are at wits' end as they struggle to mount an effective response to Trump, who pulled off a comeback for the ages in November that left critics wailing in despair once again.
Trump's Democratic opponents have turned to lame stunts like selling tacos outside of the Republican headquarters - as Democrats burn $20 million on an absurd effort to study male voters.
The scene in Newark on Saturday was another reminder of Trump's unique ability to captivate a crowd, a talent that has powered his historic career in politics from the beginning.
Charisma cannot be copied or bought, as Musk could soon discover if he continues to challenge the president.
President Trump says that Elon Musk will face "very serious consequences" if he starts supporting Democrats in future elections.
The comment is consistent with Trump's response to Musk's shocking public meltdown - restrained but firm, with a hint of a threat.
The alliance between Musk, a former Democrat who became Trump's biggest campaign benefactor in 2024, collapsed last week as Musk suddenly targeted Trump and his reconciliation bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination."
Over the course of a dramatic day, Musk continued to flame Trump on Thursday, claiming without evidence that he is named in the Epstein files (Musk later deleted the post), taking credit for his election victory and calling for him to be impeached. Musk even suggested starting his own political party, fueling speculation that he could use his vast fortune to challenge Trump and his GOP allies.
“If he does, he’ll have to pay the consequences for that," Trump told NBC News in a phone interview on Saturday. “He’ll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.”
Musk's influence showed its limits earlier this year, when the world's richest man backed the losing candidate in a Supreme Court race in Wisconsin, a swing state that Trump carried in November.
Later, Musk said he would be scaling back his campaign contributions, but it's unclear if Musk might walk back the pledge, which was made before his break-up with Trump.
While Musk's erratic behavior makes his future plans hard to predict, a majority of Republicans are still siding with Trump. Vice President J.D. Vance, in a podcast interview recorded during Musk's online meltdown, said that Musk's relationship with Trump could be broken irreparably, calling Musk's Epstein smear a "big mistake."
“I’m always going to be loyal to the president, and I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold,” Vance said. “Maybe that’s not possible now because he’s gone so nuclear.”
Trump, in comments over the weekend, showed little desire for reconciliation as he warned Musk against further escalation.
“I think it’s a very bad thing, because he’s very disrespectful,” Trump said. “You could not disrespect the office of the president.”
When asked if their relationship is over, Trump responded, “I would assume so, yeah."
While Musk may be the wealthiest man in the world, Trump is still its most powerful political leader. That means Musk, if he is smart, should take Trump's warnings about "serious consequences" very seriously.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A promotional webpage published by the Chicago-based JLB Law Group titled "Legal Immigration from India: Your Complete Guide to U.S. Pathways" reveals more than just immigration options. It offers a blueprint for how foreign nationals, specifically from India, can exploit nearly every major U.S. immigration category, from student and work visas to green card waivers and domestic abuse protections, often in ways that undermine the integrity of the system and disadvantage American citizens.
The law firm openly markets its services not to immigrants broadly, but explicitly to Indian nationals, despite the fact that U.S. immigration law is nationality-neutral. This nationality-specific targeting raises serious ethical concerns. When American law firms promote immigration pathways tailored to one foreign country that already dominates visa issuance, such as India with over 70% of all H-1B visas, it reflects systemic bias and contributes to labor market distortion.
One of the most misleading elements of the guide is its treatment of the F-1 student visa. The firm highlights the F-1 not simply as a path to education but as an employment gateway, emphasizing that students can obtain Optional Practical Training (OPT) and STEM OPT extensions that allow up to three years of U.S. work authorization. What the firm fails to disclose is that OPT is not a guaranteed benefit, but a discretionary training program. Nor does it mention that OPT employees are exempt from payroll taxes, giving employers a financial incentive to hire foreign graduates over U.S. students.
By marketing the F-1 visa as a job opportunity rather than a study permit, JLB Law Group contributes to a growing trend of foreign nationals entering the U.S. with education as a pretext, then transitioning into the labor force through OPT. This practice not only displaces qualified American graduates but also undermines the intent of the visa.
The guide also promotes the H-1B visa, calling it one of the most popular options for Indian professionals. It fails to mention that the H-1B program has been repeatedly flagged by Congress and the Department of Labor for widespread abuse, wage suppression and outsourcing fraud. U.S. companies and foreign staffing firms often use the H-1B visa not to fill true talent shortages, but to replace American workers with lower-paid, visa-dependent labor, a process sometimes culminating in U.S. employees being forced to train their foreign replacements.
JLB Law Group also encourages the use of the L-1 visa, which allows multinational companies to transfer employees from foreign offices to the U.S. without labor market testing or wage requirements. This visa has been heavily exploited by Indian tech firms to rotate workers in and out of the U.S. while circumventing U.S. hiring standards. By advertising it as a seamless route for Indian professionals, the firm ignores the consequences for American IT workers whose jobs are being offshored or outsourced.
Even more concerning is the firm's promotion of the National Interest Waiver (NIW) under the EB-2 green card category. The NIW allows foreign nationals to bypass employer sponsorship if they can prove their work benefits the national interest. In the hands of researchers and highly skilled innovators, the NIW is a legitimate provision. But law firms like JLB are now encouraging ordinary professionals to apply under NIW by reframing their resumes to sound nationally significant. This trend has transformed a narrow exception into a broad loophole.
Between FY 2018 and FY 2023, the percentage of EB-2 green card petitions using the National Interest Waiver (NIW) route surged from 12% to 43%, a nearly fourfold increase. USCIS data shows that while total EB-2 petitions grew, non-NIW petitions dropped and NIW filings nearly doubled between FY 2022 and FY 2023 alone. This spike correlates with mass layoffs in the tech industry and a growing number of PERM labor certifications failing due to labor market test failures and PERM pauses, especially at companies like Google and Meta.
Internal posts reveal that major employers paused PERM filings due to their inability to meet DOL requirements, pushing foreign workers toward self-petitioned NIWs instead.
The NIW was designed for individuals whose work benefits the U.S. at a national level not as a backup for failed labor market tests. But AI-driven legal platforms and social media forums are now openly marketing NIW as a workaround to bypass PERM scrutiny, with one developer boasting an 80% approval rate using a DIY AI tool.
Despite this, employer-specific data shows mixed results. At Meta, for example, 63% of employees reported their NIWs were denied even when filed through company attorneys, raising concerns over the actual merit of many of these petitions. As NIW exploitation becomes a substitute for employer sponsorship and labor testing, it threatens the very foundation of U.S. worker protections under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
JLB describes the National Interest Waiver (NIW) as a pathway for those whose work "strengthens the U.S. economic system and national interests." But the firm provides no context about the highly subjective criteria used to evaluate such petitions, nor does it address the growing misuse of the waiver by foreign nationals coached to manipulate the language of "national benefit." As with the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, the real victims are American professionals, shut out of opportunities by visa schemes never meant for foreign workforce expansion.
But perhaps the most egregious section on the JLB site is its treatment of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Positioned casually alongside student and employment visa categories, VAWA is framed as a viable option for those "looking for legal immigration status in the U.S. without their abuser's involvement." The firm even offers a self-screening guide to help applicants assess their eligibility, without any warning about the serious consequences of filing a false claim or the humanitarian purpose of the law. VAWA petitions after entering sham marriages, fabricating abuse and submitting falsified documentation to secure green cards.
By marketing VAWA alongside job- and education-based immigration routes, the firm implies it can serve as a backup plan if marriage-based or employment petitions fail. This isn't just misleading, it's dangerous. It opens the door to fraud and exploitation of a law meant to protect true victims. And this concern is not hypothetical.
Indian nationals have already been prosecuted in federal court for precisely this kind of abuse. In United States v. Nasir Hussain, the defendant was convicted after submitting a VAWA petition built on fake medical reports, fabricated cohabitation records and a non-existent spouse. In United States v. Hiren Makwana, another Indian national pleaded guilty to entering a sham marriage and filing a false VAWA petition once the relationship collapsed.
In another disturbing case Indian Nationals pled guilty to staging armed robberies at more than nine stores across several states. Their goal? To create fake police reports so clerks could apply for U nonimmigrant status (U visas) by claiming to be victims of violent crimes.
Meanwhile, VAWA filings have exploded. In 2010, just over 8,200 petitions were filed. By 2023, that number had skyrocketed to over 50,000, with more than 104,000 petitions pending. As of mid-2024, VAWA filings exceeded 51,000, with a backlog approaching 150,000. Particularly troubling is the spike in parent-based VAWA claims, cases in which foreign-born parents allege abuse by their U.S. citizen children. These rare and difficult-to-substantiate claims are now being filed in the tens of thousands.
USCIS data confirms the trend. As reported in 2023 VAWA petitions increased by 46% and the numbers continue to rise. On November 11, 2024, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it would begin conducting more thorough interviews for VAWA self-petitioners. The change followed a string of high-profile fraud cases in New York, Massachusetts and Maryland, alongside the explosive growth in filings.
All of this is packaged on a single webpage like a menu, lawful, attainable and curated specifically for Indian nationals seeking U.S. residency. From F-1 to H-1B, from L-1 to NIW and ultimately to VAWA, the message is unmistakable: if one path fails, pivot to another. There is no concern for displaced American workers, no deterrent against fraud, no mention of integrity. Just a relentless pursuit of access, by any means necessary.
Behind the language of law and opportunity lies a sprawling pipeline fueled by desperation and greed. From immigration law firms, universities, shady consultancies, middlemen in India, recruiters in America, everyone wants a piece of the profit. And in their pursuit, they exploit loopholes, defraud the U.S. immigration system and trample over the livelihoods of American workers.
India's obsession with America is no secret. As one smuggler confessed, "They only want to go to America. America is a craze. And they only want to go to America at any cost. No matter what the cost is."
This isn't immigration. This is industrialized manipulation. A coordinated strategy to turn America into India's second homeland, at our expense. When humanitarian laws like VAWA are reduced to backup plans for failed employment or marriage visas, it's not just a loophole. It's a weapon.
The American people deserve a system that serves them, not one sold off to foreign agendas, one form at a time.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Scientists working with the Defense Intelligence Agency concluded only three months after the COVID-19 pandemic began that it likely was genetically manufactured and escaped a Chinese lab, according to a report from Just the News.
That's in direct conflict with the often-repeated claims from Anthony Fauci, then a public health official and presidential adviser on COVID, that it had evolved in nature.
The report explained the bombshell revelation now is at the heart of investigations into a possible U.S. intelligence cover-up.
A slide from the DIA National Center for Medical Intelligence presentation on June 25, 2020, charges, "SARS-CoV-2 Spike Appears to be a Chimera."
"Chimera" is considered a "genetically engineered pathogen, the report said.
The study traces the process used for creating the new virus to an earlier manuscript that the Wuhan Institute of Virology, considered by most in the medical and science communities now to have been the source of the China virus that circled the globe killing millions, and triggering the sudden development of mRNA shots that now have been confirmed to have triggered side effects, some fatal, in millions.
The special presentation, according to the report, said, "Break points align with those identified by WIV Scientists in 2008."
Further, the study found, "The molecular biology capabilities of WIV and the genome assessment are consistent with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was a lab-engineered virus that was part of a bank of chimeric viruses … at WIV that escaped from containment."
The stunning revelation that destroys the long-claimed story line that COVID developed in nature and jumped to humans, was uncovered recently under the Freedom of Information Act from U.S. intelligence agencies, the report said.
"At least four whistleblowers have been interviewed in recent months by the Intelligence Community Inspector General's office, the DIA's internal watchdog and the FBI about the early findings from DIA's National Center for Medical Intelligence and whether there was an effort to keep those genetic sleuths from communicating their evidence to other intelligence agencies, government officials told Just the News," the report said.
"One area of focus is whether intelligence agencies sought to suppress the DIA research from a highly public release by President Joe Biden's Director of National Intelligence Office in 2021 that assessed that COVID was 'equally likely' to have come from nature or a lab accident, the officials said."
The report said Sen. Roger "Doc" Marshall, R-Kan., earlier warned that information about COVID had been censored and that was "an alarming breach of integrity in the investigative process."
Multiple whistleblowers also have offered similar claims about COVID, its source and investigations into its origins.
The report said the FBI has begun a "sprawling criminal investigation" into COVID cover-ups. Just recently, FBI chief Kash Patel revealed his agents obtained the long-sought cellphones belonging to Fauci during the pandemic.
Members of Congress long have sought details about COVID, its origins and its path that left the world economy shaken.
For example, the report noted, already revealed was that intelligence reports showed a "biological hazard cleanup" at Wuihan in 2019, weeks after the first death was reported, a type of cleanup consistent with a lab leak.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Cars burned. Buildings attacked. Federal officers threatened. And to one network, it's a "bunch of people having fun…"
Networks were ridiculed during earlier riots in Wisconsin for having a reporter, standing in front of blocks of burning buildings, describe how the violence was "mostly peaceful."
That wild claim already has been matched in the Los Angeles riots, triggered by a violent reaction to federal officers performing their duties in arresting illegal alien criminals, some accused of murder and hurting children.
That network claim was that the events were a "bunch of people having fun…"
A report at the Gateway Pundit noted the ABC claim was as "record absurdity."
"It's the new 'fiery but mostly peaceful protests,'" the report said. That would be a local ABC 7 anchor describing the anti-ICE insurrection burning down the city and attacking federal officers as "just a bunch of people having fun, watching cars burn."
The report said the anchor, "reported to be ABC7 Eyewitness News co-anchor Marc Brown," charged that it was the Trump administration that could "a massive confrontation and altercation between officers and demonstrators" by bringing in law enforcement.
He pointed out, "It could turn very volatile if you move law enforcement in there."
The report cited history: "It can be recalled that CNN once described the riots in Kenosha, Wisconsin, as 'fiery but mostly peaceful protests' in the days after sex offender and police attacker Jacob Blake was shot by police in what was later found to be a justified shooting."