This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Not guilty of murder but guilty of operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol.
That's the jury's determination in the case against Karen Read.
She was charged for the death of her Boston policeman boyfriend John O'Keefe.
Prosecutors claimed she ran into him and killed him during a blizzard in January 2022.
The verdict from jurors said she was not guilty of second-degree murder, which was the most serious claim. But they convicted her on of a lesser offense of driving a vehicle with a blood-alcohol content of .08% or more.
A report from Fox News said a special prosecutor in the case, Hank Brennan, asked the judge for a sentence of a year of probation and for her to be ordered into an outpatient program, which is routine in the jurisdiction for first drunken driving offenses.
The jury also returned not guilty verdicts to drunken driving manslaughter and fleeing the scene of a deadly accident.
It was her second trial. During the first, last year, jurors deadlocked.
Her supporters burst into cheers on hearing the decision.
The month-long testimony included statements from two women, Jennifer McCabe and Kerry Roberts, who said they were with Read when O'Keefe was found lying in the snow and unresponsive. McCabe claimed Read said, three times, "I hit him."
The report said the couple and others had been out drinking before an after-party at the home of Brian Albert. O'Keefe was found on Albert's lawn hours later.
Prosecutors alleged Read hit O'Keefe and drove to his house without him. Read's defense said she never hit him, suggesting the injuries came from a dog attack and a party altercation.
The Norfolk County jury had been deliberating since June 13.
"Today, our hearts are with John and the entire O'Keefe family. They have suffered through so much and deserved better from our justice system," said a statement released by members of the Albert and McCabe families. "While we may have more to say in the future, today we mourn with John's family and lament the cruel reality that this prosecution was infected by lies and conspiracy theories spread by Karen Read, her defense team, and some in the media."
The jury has posed several questions to the judge during deliberations, including about whether there could be a split verdict.
Beverly Cannone, the judge, said she was unable to answer hypotheticals.
Elon Musk posted what appeared to be the negative results of a urinalysis to dispute claims that he uses drugs, the New York Post reported. The New York Times accused the former Department of Government Efficiency head of using drugs during the 2024 presidential campaign and beyond.
Musk's public behavior has indeed been erratic and at times intense. His public falling out with President Donald Trump seemed to confirm what many have been saying behind closed doors.
To combat these rumors, Musk posted what appeared to be a comprehensive panel for controlled substances, all showing "negative" or "normal" results. Musk shared this with the simple caption "lol" on X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday.
lol pic.twitter.com/pMe3YfXFxS
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 17, 2025
The New York Times recently ran an explosive piece accusing Musk of using drugs, including ketamine, a tranquilizer used for anxiety. Musk has admitted to using a "small amount" occasionally, as directed by his doctor.
"If you’ve used too much ketamine, you can’t really get work done, and I have a lot of work," Musk said. However, the Times claims that sources said Musk ratcheted up his drug use during the campaign, using psychedlic mushrooms, ecstasy, Adderall, and ketamine.
Musk reportedly traveled with a medication organizer that contained about 20 pills and suffered from "bladder issues," which can be attributed to Ketamine use. Notably, the Times said Musk's infamous "Nazi salute," which was nothing but fabrication by the mainstream media, was possible proof of a drug problem.
The Wall Street Journal had also reported on Musk's use of the sleep aid Ambien, which worried the board members at Tesla where Musk acts as CEO. The Journal said Musk also allegedly used LSD, cocaine, and other drugs that left everyone around him unsettled.
With so many media reports about his drug use, it seems plausible that there's at least some truth to it. However, the most compelling argument is Musk's behavior, negative test results notwithstanding.
Regardless of whether or not there's truth behind the reports of drug use, it's difficult to deny that Musk provides plenty of reasons to speculate. Most recently, Musk went scorched earth on Trump after the two agreed to part ways.
In a series of social media posts, Musk claimed Trump couldn't release the files on accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein because the president was implicated in them. He also said Trump only won the 2024 presidential election thanks to the SpaceX mogul's help.
After several such posts, Musk finally deleted them and walked back his comments. "I regret some of my posts about President [Trump] last week. They went too far," Musk said.
As for Trump, he allegedly said privately that Musk was a "big-time drug addict," but wouldn't say so publicly. "I really don’t know. I don’t think so. I hope not," Trump said when a reporter asked about whether Musk was on drugs in the White House.
The document Musk posted showed that he had no drugs in his system. While there's no proof of anything otherwise, Musk should be careful about his behavior that fuels such rumors.
Donald Trump abruptly left the G7 Summit in Canada, adding fuel to the already intense situation between Israel and Iran, the Daily Mail reported.
The former U.S. president denied claims by French President Emmanuel Macron that he was leaving the summit to broker peace, instead stating he returned to Washington for a much larger reason.
Trump's early exit came after tension with Macron, who speculated that Trump intended to negotiate peace to resolve the conflict between Israel and Iran. Trump immediately dispelled these claims, criticizing Macron's remarks as misleading.
Macron had suggested that a ceasefire agreement was possible and that the United States could play a pivotal role in it. Trump's refusal to sign a G7 joint statement calling for a de-escalation before his departure further fueled speculation.
Upon departing the summit, Trump expressed his intentions to meet with the National Security Council upon his return to Washington. The Israeli-Iran conflict has seen a significant rise in hostilities, marked by Israel's intensified air campaign and warnings of evacuation in Tehran.
The former president took to Truth Social to express his stance, emphasizing Iran must not possess nuclear weapons. He encouraged the evacuation in Tehran amid escalating concerns.
The ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran has escalated with a significant number of casualties. Israel's military operations have reportedly killed 224 people since the escalation started.
Iran launched retaliatory missile and drone attacks against Israeli targets, resulting in further devastation. The Israeli military, asserting its aerial dominance over Tehran, targeted various Iranian military installations.
Brigadier General Effie Defrin, an Israeli military spokesperson, declared that Israel had obtained full control over Tehran's skies. This demonstrated Israel's intent to counter Iran's nuclear ambitions.
The abrupt departure of Trump from the G7 Summit meant he missed planned discussions with both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo. These meetings were expected to address other significant international issues.
During the summit, Trump notably signed an important trade agreement with the United Kingdom, showcasing his diplomatic efforts beyond the escalating Middle Eastern crisis. Discussions with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer included the potential of a future nuclear deal with Iran.
Despite his departure, Trump pointed out that Israel was managing its military engagement well. He reaffirmed his belief that a future agreement between Iran and Israel could be brokered, drawing parallels with past diplomatic successes.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reassured that the U.S. was strategically positioned in the region to support peace efforts. He emphasized the country's state of readiness to protect its interests and people.
Macron reiterated his hope for a ceasefire, acknowledging that U.S. involvement could lead to positive outcomes. The significance of the U.S.' role in the region remains crucial as hostilities have continued to capture global attention.
In his latest statements, Trump reiterated his long-standing viewpoint that Iran should refrain from nuclear development. His return to Washington, while shrouded in mystery, underscores the gravity of the situation.
For the first time in 50 years, America's immigrant population is shrinking, thanks to President Trump's hardline policies.
It makes for a stunning reversal after a historic Biden-era influx that drove the foreign-born population to its highest level ever.
As reported by the Washington Post, the immigrant population is heading for a net loss for the first time in half a century, owing to a stark drop in border crossings and other pathways to entry being closed off.
Immigration advocates warn that a decline in the immigrant population could have economic downsides, with fewer foreign laborers paying taxes and performing low-skill jobs that Americans supposedly refuse to do. But to the millions of Americans who support Trump's deportation drive, this new trend is an encouraging sign that America is finally regaining control of its borders after years of uncontrolled mass immigration.
The Trump administration dismisses the gloomy predictions of economists, citing the "untapped potential" of Americans forced to the sidelined by an influx of cheap foreign labor.
"There is no shortage of American minds and hands to grow our labor force, and President Trump’s agenda to create jobs for American workers represents this Administration’s commitment to capitalizing on that untapped potential while delivering on our mandate to enforce our immigration laws," White House spokesman Kush Desai said.
Under Trump's predecessor, millions of aliens poured across America's borders, bringing the foreign-born share of the workforce to a record 19%. But after just five months of Trump's polices, the trend is reversing.
The prediction comes from a forthcoming policy paper authored by two Washington think tanks, the left-leaning Brookings Institution and conservative American Enterprise Institute.
“For the year as a whole, we think it’s likely [immigration] will be negative,” said Wendy Edelberg, of the Brookings Institution. "It certainly would be the first time in more than 50 years.”
Within weeks of entering the White House for the second time, Trump sealed the border, sending crossings dropping to historic lows. Trump also shut down so-called legal pathways that the Biden administration tapped to flood the country, like a "humanitarian parole" program that admitted 500,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security has ramped up interior enforcement at worksites in order to reach Trump's ambitious deportation targets, with officials calling for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to make 3,000 arrests a day.
Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown sparked a violent backlash this month in majority-minority Los Angeles, as rioters attacked police with bricks and waved Mexican flags. Roughly a third of the population in the Democratic city is foreign-born.
In a reversal, Trump ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to resume enforcement in farming and hospitality, industries that disproportionately hire illegal aliens. The president had faced backlash from his own MAGA base after he backed away from targeting those locations, citing concerns about the economy.
"Worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of our efforts to safeguard public safety, national security and economic stability," Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said. "These operations target illegal employment networks that undermine American workers, destabilize labor markets and expose critical infrastructure to exploitation."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
With the armed conflict between Israel and Iran escalating, President Donald Trump has advised Iran to capitulate, saying on social media that even though the U.S. knows the hidden location of the nation's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, he doesn't want Khamenei killed "for now," but rather is calling for Iran's "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER."
Now with over 220 people having been killed by Israeli airstrikes against Iran to deter its nuclear program, the U.S. and Israel have advised millions of Iranian people to evacuate their nation's capital city of Tehran. On Monday, Trump said on social media, "IRAN CANNOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON," adding, "Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!"
In an interview with WorldNetDaily, veteran national security analyst Ryan Mauro of the Capital Research Center said the issuing of statements to evacuate Tehran may have multiple intentions. "It likely has purposes beyond just minimizing casualties ahead of large Israeli strikes," explained Mauro, who has focused his expertise on the Middle East for over 20 years.
Broadly speaking, he said, an evacuation would help "drain Iranian resources." But there are other more specific reasons, he told WND.
With the potential for hundreds of thousands to begin exiting the city, Mauro said, "Traffic jams would make it harder for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Iranian ground forces and mobile weaponry to deploy and move around."
Likewise, he said, should traffic be ordered to one side of the road to create an evacuation lane for the Iranian military, that would "give away their cover and identify themselves to aerial observers."
And the chaos of massive amounts of traffic has other advantages for Israel, the national security analyst pointed out. "It's much easier to move covert operators and informants around because [their] movement blends in, as checkpoints and domestic security become overwhelmed."
Mauro said the call for evacuation also "induced panic and possible defections." He explained: "Israeli intel can see which Iranian units are responsive to regime commands to stay put, or move to more dangerous locations," adding that "the ones who prefer staying alive will refuse or will drag their feet."
What's more, he said, "there will be increased opportunities for assassinations." For example, he explained, "Israel can't kill a target because he lives in the middle of an apartment building, but if he evacuates and gets stuck in traffic, he's now vulnerable and local security's response time is lessened due to congestion." Likewise, Mauro added, "Should a target stay inside a building but everyone else has evacuated, you can now target the building via an airstrike or infiltrate a hit squad when you couldn't before."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
MyPillow chief Mike Lindell, a staunch supporter of President Donald Trump throughout the Democrat lawfare against him, has been told by a federal jury to pay an ex-voting systems executive $2.3 million in a defamation case.
Lindell immediately called it a victory, since the plaintiff had demanded $62.7 million, and confirmed the amount awarded will be appealed.
Lindell was found liable by a jury in the far-left enclave of Denver for claiming election fraud in the 2020 election.
He was sued by Eric Coomer, ex-official at Dominion Voting Systems, a company that was under fire from a number of critics after the 2020 election results.
In that election, there was confirmed fraud in multiple cases as well as significant levels of undue influence. For one, Mark Zuckerberg dished out hundreds of millions of dollars to local election officials who often used the cash to recruit voters in Democrat districts. Further, the FBI actually interfered in the election by instructing media outlets to suppress the damaging information about the Bidens revealed in a laptop computer that was abandoned at a repair shop by Hunter Biden. Polling showed the influenced probably cost Trump that election.
The jury claimed Lindell's comments were "baseless conspiracy theories claiming election fraud in the 2020 election."
Coomer claimed Lindell and his companies "helped spread a conspiracy theory that he rigged the election against President Donald Trump," according to locally published reports.
Coomer's lawyer said he was thrilled with the verdict.
Lindell issued a press release explaining MyPillow was "fully exonerated," and he was cleared of claims of "malice" and "conspiracy" and no punitive damages were awarded.
His statement said, "In a defiant stand for the First Amendment, Mike Lindell, CEO of MyPillow, has emerged largely victorious in a closely watched defamation trial brought by former Dominion Voting Systems executive Eric Coomer. While corporate media giants like Fox News surrendered under pressure – paying $787.5 million to Dominion to avoid a courtroom showdown – Lindell took the fight all the way to a jury trial and was overwhelmingly cleared of wrongdoing."
Lindell said, "This was huge victory for our country! MyPillow was sued for No reason and they won!"
The statement confirmed the jury's award was being appealed.
The statement added, "While we do not agree that the plaintiff was entitled to any award whatsoever, and his motivations were to harm Mike Lindell, this was nevertheless a victory for Lindell, a victory for MyPillow, and a historic win for free speech in America."
A federal judge in Boston ruled Monday that President Donald Trump's administration could not make cuts to the National Institutes of Health research grants, NBC News reported. U.S. District Judge William Young said that eliminating research grants for diversity, equity, and inclusion is "void and illegal."
The judge believes that the administration had no authority to cancel the $1 billion in federal research grants. The remedy was to reinstate the grants, which will be returned to the plaintiffs, including organizations and Democrat-led states that initiated the lawsuit.
"This represents racial discrimination and discrimination against America’s LGBTQ community. Any discrimination by our government is so wrong that it requires the court to enjoin it and at an appropriate time, I’m going to do it," Young explained.
Young, whose decision blindsided Trump because he's an appointee of President Ronald Reagan, said that he had "never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable" in his 40 years on the bench. "You are bearing down on people of color because of their color. The Constitution will not permit that," the judge added.
Trump and his administration have fought against DEI initiatives precisely because they favor some groups over others in a reverse discrimination. However, Young asserts that objecting to grants that particularly focus on DEI subjects is the source of injustice.
According to Fox News, White House Spokesman Kush Desai believes Young was ruling from his own political viewpoint. "It is appalling that a federal judge would use court proceedings to express his political views and preferences," Desai said in a statement to Fox News.
"How is a judge going to deliver an impartial decision when he explicitly stated his biased opinion that the Administration’s retraction of illegal DEI funding is racist and anti-LGBTQ? Justice ceases to be administered when a judge clearly rules on the basis of his political ideologies," Desai charged.
Of course, the administration will not take this lying down. HHS Communications Director Andrew Nixon said in a statement that the agency "is exploring all legal options, including filing an appeal and moving to stay the order" in the future.
"HHS stands by its decision to end funding for research that prioritized ideological agendas over scientific rigor and meaningful outcomes for the American people," Nixon said. He added that the agency is "committed to ensuring that taxpayer dollars support programs rooted in evidence-based practices and gold standard science, not driven by divisive DEI mandates or gender ideology."
Trump took on the broader issue of DEI in just about every corner of the government as part of his promised second-term agenda. The president set to work on his first day in office to dismantle DEI, as evidenced by a White House action on January 20.
As the release noted, "nearly every Federal agency and entity submitted 'Equity Action Plans' to detail the ways that they have furthered DEIs infiltration of the Federal Government" under then-President Joe Biden. The Trump administration called this "immense public waste and shameful discrimination," the declaration said.
"That ends today. Americans deserve a government committed to serving every person with equal dignity and respect, and to expending precious taxpayer resources only on making America great," the White House added.
Trump is committed to ensuring that there is no preferential treatment in the distribution of money or resources in the United States. He has been accused of being the one perpetuating discrimination when really, he's the one reversing it by dispensing with these policies.
There's no reason any group should receive anything over another simply by virtue of some arbitrarily chosen characteristics of that group. Young was wrong to blame Trump, but this speaks to a sickness in government brought on by wokeism.
President Donald Trump’s abrupt exit from the G7 Summit in Alberta, Canada, signals a no-nonsense focus on America’s security amid escalating Middle East chaos.
He’s ditching the diplomatic dinner’s dessert course to tackle Iran’s nuclear ambitions head-on, Breitbart reported on Monday. This move underscores a leader prioritizing action over pleasantries.
Trump attended productive G7 meetings, inked a major trade deal with the United Kingdom, but left early after dinner with Heads of State due to rising tensions involving Iran and Israel. His departure reflects a strategic pivot to address pressing global threats. The White House insists he accomplished plenty before boarding Air Force One.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt praised Trump’s G7 performance, saying he signed a “major trade deal” with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Her glowing review conveniently sidesteps why Trump rejected the summit’s weak-kneed statement on Iran’s nuclear activities. A pat on the back doesn’t mask the real story: Trump’s fed up with diplomatic dithering.
Trump’s trade focus shone brightly, with Breitbart News noting his emphasis on economic deals during the summit. He met with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, likely hammering out details to boost American interests. The UK trade agreement stands as a win for his “America First” mantra.
“President Trump had a great day at the G7,” Leavitt declared, highlighting the UK deal. Yet, her enthusiasm feels like a distraction from the Middle East firestorm pulling Trump back to Washington. Trade victories are sweet, but they don’t douse Iran’s nuclear flames.
Trump’s early exit was triggered by heightened Middle East tensions, particularly Iran’s provocative nuclear moves. Israel’s recent strike on Iran’s military and nuclear sites sparked a dangerous tit-for-tat. Iran retaliated with missile attacks on Israeli cities, ratcheting up the stakes.
The G7’s response? A milquetoast statement calling for “monitoring” Iran’s nuclear activities. Trump, unsurprisingly, rejected this toothless approach, demanding a harder line to stop Iran’s nuclear program cold. His stance exposes the summit’s failure to grasp the gravity of the threat.
On Truth Social, Trump thundered, “IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON.” His all-caps conviction screams “America First” while slamming the G7’s spineless diplomacy. The man’s not subtle, but subtlety won’t stop a rogue regime’s nuclear dreams.
“Much was accomplished,” Leavitt said, but Trump’s leaving “because of what’s going on in the Middle East.” Her words admit the G7’s trade talks and handshakes couldn’t compete with the urgency of Iran’s aggression. Trump’s bolting for DC to deal with the real world, not summit photo-ops.
Breitbart reported Trump’s outright dismissal of the G7’s Iran statement, which he saw as a feeble wrist-slap. The summit’s call to merely “monitor” Iran’s nuclear activities is diplomatic quicksand—slow, ineffective, and dangerous. Trump’s refusal to play along shows he’s not here for globalist groupthink.
Israel’s preemptive strike on Iran’s sites last week was a bold move, met with Iran’s reckless missile barrage. This isn’t a game of chess; it’s a high-stakes showdown. Trump’s early departure suggests he’s ready to back allies and confront enemies, not just talk about it.
Trump’s “AMERICA FIRST” Truth Social post also screamed, “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!” It’s a rally cry that ties his G7 trade wins to his hardline Iran stance. Critics might call it bombast, but supporters see a leader unafraid to shake up the status quo.
Leavitt’s claim that Trump accomplished “much” at the G7 isn’t wrong—trade deals matter. But the Middle East’s boiling point demands a commander-in-chief who doesn’t linger at summits while missiles fly. Trump’s exit is a calculated move to put America’s safety first.
The G7’s tepid Iran statement proves why Trump’s skepticism of multilateral fluff is justified. Monitoring Iran’s nuclear ambitions sounds nice until you realize it’s code for doing nothing. Trump’s heading home to steer the ship, not rearrange deck chairs.
Trump’s G7 stint was a whirlwind of trade triumphs and a swift exit driven by Middle East realities. He signed a landmark UK deal, rejected a spineless Iran statement, and left Alberta to confront a growing crisis. America’s leader isn’t here to sip wine while Iran plays nuclear roulette.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Media critics are urging the firing of CNN's Brian Stelter after the network's controversial media reporter tried to politicize Saturday's shooting of two Minnesota Democrats by an appointee of Gov. Tim Walz.
Stelter was reacting to a post on X by CNN correspondent Edward-Isaac Dovere, who stated:
"In the last week, Marines were deployed in an American city,the president has called for a gov to be arrested &the speaker of the House has called for that gov to be tarred & feathered, a senator has been pinned & handcuffed, and 2 state legislators have been shot in their homes."
Stelter posted his own opinion on the matter, indicating:
"And it all points in the same direction:"
"Brian Stelter should be fired," said Stephen L. Miller, host of the "Versus Media" podcast on Substack.
Miller mentioned the firing of Terry Moran last week after the ABC News fired its longtime reporter who verbally flayed President Donald Trump as a hater.
"What Brian Stelter did is worse than what Terry Moran did," he noted.
Fox News contributor Joe Concha said: "Brian should be put on the air and forced to apologize before handing in his resignation. Seriously."
"It's as if Brian is begging CNN to join Acosta, Lemon and Moran by being fired again. How is this acceptable?" Concha added.
Nicholas Fondacaro of NewsBusters also brought up the ABC News example, saying: "The Terry-Moran Standard should be applied to Brian."
Mike LaChance of the Gateway Pundit noted: "Like many other liberal media news outlets, CNN has been struggling in the ratings since the 2024 election. The reckless partisanship and misinformation spread by people like Brian Stelter is not helping them."
State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot and killed in the attack at their home, which took place after 2 a.m. Saturday. State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife are alive after the attack at their home, but wounded. Both lawmakers were Democrats.
The suspect, Vance Luther Boelter, 57, who is still at large, was dressed as a police officer when he approached the homes.
Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were assassinated over the weekend in what appears to be a politically motivated killing, sending shockwaves across the state and nation.
According to Fox 9, President Donald Trump reacted quickly to the devastating and scary news of their deaths, saying
"such horrific violence will not be tolerated."
The same suspect also shot state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, who are both expected to survive.
The president released a full statement after the murders were confirmed, vowing to have his DOJ get to the bottom of what happened and how to prevent it from happening in the future.
The president assured the public that his top people would be on the case until it's resolved.
"I have been briefed on the terrible shooting that took place in Minnesota, which appears to be a targeted attack against state lawmakers. Our Attorney General, Pam Bondi, and the FBI, are investigating the situation, and they will be prosecuting anyone involved to the fullest extent of the law.
He added, "Such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America. God Bless the great people of Minnesota, a truly great place."
For her part, Attorney General Pam Bondi said that the FBI was on the ground where the lawmakers were murdered, working with state and local law enforcement, saying she's "closely monitoring" the situation.
She added, "This horrific violence will not be tolerated and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law."
The outlet added:
FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said, "The FBI is fully engaged on the ground in Minnesota and is working in collaboration with our local and state partners."
Vance Boelter was named as the suspect in the killing/shootings and was caught just a few days later and charged.
Vance Luther Boelter has formally been charged.
Bail set at $5M.
4 counts of 2nd Degree of Můrdęr WITH Intent NOT Premeditated.
The Statement of Probable Cause confirms that he was dressed as a Police Officer and had identified himself as one.
How is that not Premeditated!?! pic.twitter.com/F3tNwHaYfb
— Southern FFA Family (@FFAFamily) June 16, 2025
Many are claiming that there's much more to this story, given some of the oddities surrounding the suspect.
Only time will tell where it goes.