This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A new report has been released that documents an argument being described by promoters of the lucrative abortion industry as being about "abortion" actually is more accurately assigned to a completely different dispute: infanticide.
"The abortion industry and its sympathizers want to make this about abortion. It's not. It's about infanticide," explained Carol Tobias of National Right to Life. "It is barbaric that newborns who have the temerity to survive an abortion are considered the 'dreaded complication' by abortionists.'
"The baby who survives an abortion deserves the full protection of the law."
This controversy, pushed into the headlines in previous situations such as when Gov. Ralph Northam several years back confirmed a baby would be born, made comfortable, and then the doctor and mother would decide what to do with it, has returned.
It has resurfaced just as "pro-abortion groups have promoted false narratives about babies who are born alive during abortions. Additionally, vice presidential candidate and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is under scrutiny and criticism for his actions in reversing state protections for babies born alive following abortions," the report said.
Pending before Congress, in fact, is the "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act" to require when a baby is born alive following an abortion, health care workers "must exercise the same degree of professional skill and care that would be offered to any other child born alive at the same gestational age."
WND reported that during a recent presidential debate, when ABC's moderator, Linsey Davis, was helping Democrat candidate Kamala Harris argue with GOP candidate President Donald Trump, Davis claimed, "There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it's born."
But that's not exactly correct. A published report at Live Action News noted, "Colorado, Michigan, and California have all recently enacted laws that include the term 'pregnancy outcomes.' These states have moved to make abortion a 'right' and allow women to make choices about abortion based on undefined 'pregnancy outcomes.' The vague term could encompass situations like birth, miscarriage, abortion, and even death after birth."
The report confirmed, "Since these 'outcomes' are not defined, a post-birth death that is caused deliberately or even by negligence is not excluded."
The new report from National Right to Life cited a Philadelphia Inquirer report that confirmed: "In legalizing abortion in 1973, the Supreme Court said it was reserving the right to protect the life of a viable fetus – that is, one with the potential to survive outside the womb. But the court never directly acknowledged the chance of an aborted fetus being born alive. And it therefore never gave a clear guideline for dealing with what Dr. Thomas Kerenyi, a leading New York expert on abortions, has called 'the dreaded complication.'"
There are estimates that hundreds of children survive abortion each year.
The report explained, "In the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Stenberg v. Carhart striking down Nebraska's law banning partial-birth abortions, the Court extended Roe beyond the unborn child and to the child who was partially born and moments from birth. According to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee report (107-186) issued on the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act in 2001, 'The Carhart Court considered the location of an infant's body at the moment of death during a partial-birth abortion–delivered partly outside the body of the mother–to be of no legal significance in ruling on the constitutionality of the Nebraska law. Instead, implicit in the Carhart decision was the pernicious notion that a partially-born infant's entitlement to the protections of the law is dependent upon whether or not the partially-born child's mother wants him or her. In response, Congress passed the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act. While the legislation recognizes that a baby born alive following an abortion is legally a human being, the law does not impose penalties on medical practitioners who violate the law."
The report notes, "While federal law does recognize that a baby born alive following an abortion is a person under the law, there are no requirements to provide care for the baby following a failed abortion. The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would require that the live baby born after an abortion be treated as a patient and given the same care that would be given to an infant of the same gestational age who was born not following an abortion. This legislation would also allow a mother to sue the abortionist if he or she fails to provide care for the newborn and harm results from a violation of the law. The mother is not penalized for any reason."
Cited in the report is the case of Kermit Gosnell, who ran an abortion business and, when eventually investigated, was confirmed to have "routinely delivered live babies and then ended their lives by severing their spinal cords with scissors."
He was convicted on three counts of murder and remains imprisoned.
Further, in 2019, in the Virginia General Assembly, Delegate Kathy Tran sponsored House Bill 2491, a bill that would loosen Virginia's abortion laws and allow abortion for any reason until birth.
Majority Leader Todd Gilbert questioned her, and she openly admitted her bill would allow abortion even when the mother is showing imminent signs of giving birth.
Appropriately, in light of the approaching presidential election, the organization released details about Kamala Harris' perspectives on abortion.
She wants to use tax dollars to kill unborn children, to eliminate all state protections for the unborn and install "unlimited abortion until birth" in federal law. She also endorsed suspending safeguards that had been established for the use of chemicals to cause abortion, has overseen millions of federal dollars going to abortion industry members, has promised, if president, to demand on judicial nominees endorse unlimited abortion, and more.
Her running mate, Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, aligns with virtually the same agenda.
In his state, he's already worked to call abortion a "fundamental right" which means that that state's protections for abortion patients all were struck down.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The People's Republic of China is taking a hit economically, after U.S. tariffs, high youth unemployment, a lagging property market, and an increasing national debt, has begun to squeeze the Chinese economy.
According to Reuters financial columnist Jamie McGeever, China's response to the property crisis and growing deflation is "baffling."
"The impact of this muted response on China's economy has been stark. Growth in 2024 is likely to fall short of the government's 5.0% target, deflationary pressures are intensifying at an alarming rate, investment is collapsing, and credit growth is at a record low," McGeever said.
McGeever added Morgan Stanley economists are forecasting China's Gross Domestic Product is expected to only reach 3.9% this year and into 2025. The U.S. economy, meanwhile, is expected to have a GDP growth of 5.5%.
This is a drastic drop from the 4.2% forecast by Morgan Stanley in January, while Goldman Sachs had China with a 4.9% GDP growth, and JPMorgan predicted growth as high as 4.9%.
"China's stock market is also a notable laggard. As the rising tide of global monetary easing has lifted stock markets around the world to new highs, China has gone in the opposite direction. Shanghai's blue chip index is down 15% since May, has nearly halved since February 2021, and is close to making new multi-year lows," McGeever said.
According to a report from Bloomberg, China's car dealerships are facing an almost $20 billion loss, after Chinese consumers have become reluctant to make major purchases.
The China Automobile Dealers Association said in a statement Monday, the association is appealing to the Chinese government about the dealer's capital chain causing a price war.
"Recently, the China Automobile Dealers Association has received a large number of member companies to report that the drastic changes in the automobile market brought about by factors such as the continuous 'price war' have made auto dealers mired in a quagmire and face the outstanding problem of extremely tight capital liquidity," the association said.
The association formally submitted the "Emergency Report on the Current Financial Difficulties and Shutdown Risks of Auto Dealers" to the Chinese government, which analyzed the issue, and put forward policy recommendations to deal with it.
"At present, there are large-scale losses in the sales of new cars of auto dealers, and there is a general situation of cash flow deficit operation and the risk of capital chain rupture intensifying, and it is difficult to get rid of the dilemma of survival," the association said.
As China's economic woes deepen, many Americans are wanting to decouple from China. Former U.S. Navy SEAL and founder of Blackwater USA Erik Prince, said during an interview with Fox News' Maria Bartiromo, that the supply chain needs to come out of the hands of China because it is a huge vulnerability for the U.S., and poses several national security risks.
A recent strike by Israel against terrorist organization Hezbollah, targeted 2,800 of its senior leaders through their telecommunication network, while dozens of its members were killed through the detonation of their walkie-talkies the very next day. The strike was carried out by getting into the supply chain, and planting the devices.
Prince said there is a chance China could carry out a similar attack in the U.S. because it has so much access to the supply chain.
"It's an extreme vulnerability that we have … even the processing of rare earth minerals to the manufacturer of the integrated circuits, to the guts of many of our appliances, to even our pharmaceuticals. Imagine what they [China] could do to painkillers or to basic antibiotics, or to a lot of the stuff still made abroad. It speaks to having to have control, or visibility," Prince said.
Tense international relationships are also starting to take a toll, after China has repeatedly increased its aggression toward the Philippines with its dispute over the South China Sea. Now India, one of the world's largest emerging economies, has also voiced its concern over doing business with China.
Despite being a part of BRICS – an international alliance consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, as well as Iran, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, and Ethiopia – India's commerce and industry minister recently ruled out the possibility of a free-trade agreement between India and China.
During an interview with CNBC, India's Minister of Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal, rejected the idea that India would be joining one of the largest trade deals in the world – the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership – citing it is not in the best interest of India's farmers.
"India is not going to join the RCEP because neither did it reflect the guiding principles on which ASEAN was started, nor is it in the nation's interest to do a free trade agreement with China," Goyal said.
ASEAN – the Association of Southeast Asian Nations – is a political and economic union of 10 states in Southeast Asia, consisting of Brunei, Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia, Indonesia, Loas, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, and Singapore.
The RCEP was first signed in 2020 by 15 Asia-Pacific countries – including ASEAN nations, Australia, South Korea, China, Japan, and New Zealand. India was initially included within the agreement, but pulled out in 2019 citing unresolved "core interest" issues, according to CNBC.
"It was not in our farmers' interest, RCEP did not reflect the aspirations of our small and micro medium industries and sector, and in some form, was nothing but a free trade agreement with China. When you see from the lens sitting outside the country, you don't realize how difficult it is to compete against a non-transparent economy," Goyal said, adding China is "very opaque in its economic practices."
While China continues to operate its business in a less than transparent way, it is also attempting to infiltrate the U.S. with CCP plants.
American journalist, lawyer, and political commentator Gordan Chang said in an interview with CPAC that China is sending operatives through the southern border into the U.S. mainland to attack Americans.
"I think China is behind some of this immigration, and they're sending operatives in the United States to attack us. You know, if we go back two years, we were seeing primarily family groups for Chinese coming across our southern border, and those are people who want to live in a free society. But now, about two-thirds of Chinese migrants are single males of military age, traveling without family members coming in packs of five to fifteen," Chang said.
Chang noted the amount of Chinese nationals who have recently been caught spying for the Chinese Communist Party inside important industries – like Verizon, which recently had a Chinese national working as an IT specialist in Florida, while he sent back intelligence to the CCP.
China has also been buying up farmland all over the U.S., with many of these areas close to important military installations.
"While this is occurring, we are seeing these increased incursions and attempted incursions into our military bases by Chinese. So, I think they are trying to scope out our bases, in preparation for attacks. We're seeing Chinese migrants take target practice just immediately after they arrive in our country," Chang said.
Chang added there is also a plan to attack Americans through biological weapons.
"This is an extremely dangerous situation, and one more point, there was a secret Chinese biological weapons lab in Reedley, California, which had at least 20 pathogens according to the official count, and almost 1,000 mice that had been genetically engineered to spread disease. Take the migrants and the mice and you have a biological attack on the United States in preparation for China's attack on us and our friends and partners," Chang said.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The Al Smith Dinner is an event organized by the Catholic archbishop of New York every four years, and is a white-tie gala that raises money for Catholic charities.
It traditionally includes both presidential candidates for a night of "lighthearted roasting" and "camaraderie."
In some 40 years, only one candidate has refused to participate: Walter Mondale, he of the campaign that lost 49 states.
Harris' team told planners she will be busy campaigning when the event is held October 17.
A report at Fox News said President Donald Trump has confirmed his attendance.
Cardinal Timothy Dolan, archbishop of New York, expressed disappointment in Harris' decision, noting it's been 40 years since such a refusal happened.
"We were looking forward to giving the vice president an enthusiastic welcome and we were confident that she would find this, you know, she speaks very much about high ideals and how it's good to get away from division and come together in unity and all. That's what the Al Smith dinner is all about," he said, in the report.
The traditional began when John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon both attended the event in 1960.
The "Building Chips in America Act of 2023" has passed in the House and Senate and will go to President Joe Biden for signing, The Center Square reported. If passed, it would streamline the process of approving American manufacturers to build semiconductors.
The bill passed the House of Representatives on Monday by a 257-125 vote. It has already received a unanimous nod in the Senate and just needs Biden's signature to become law.
The legislation was a bipartisan effort initiated by Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz and Arizona Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly. Both lawmakers see it as necessary to make the U.S. less dependent on China for the important technology.
The new bill builds on the CHIPS and Science Act of 2021. "Today’s announcement that the Department of Commerce has finalized the first commercial CHIPS Incentives award with Polar Semiconductor marks the next phase of the implementation of the CHIPS and Science Act and demonstrates how we continue to deliver on the Investing in American agenda," Biden said in a statement.
Moving semiconductor manufacturing stateside is a boon for national security and sovereignty. Most lawmakers seemed to understand this when voting for the bill.
The bill's co-sponsors focused on independence from China as a key benefit. "I’m proud to have led this effort with Senator Mark Kelly to streamline environmental permitting for semiconductor factories, a crucial step in onshoring jobs and making our country less dependent on China for semiconductors critical to national defense," Cruz said in a statement.
Much of the manufacturing of these chips also happens in Tawain, an island nation with its own sovereignty under threat from China. The Building Chips in America Act of 2023 is also being touted for creating jobs.
Texas GOP Rep. Michael McCaul, who was one of the lawmakers who introduced the bill in the House of Representatives, championed the manifold benefits of the bill. "I introduced the CHIPS for America Act because — as President Trump’s national security team told me — there’s no time to waste in boosting domestic semiconductor chip production," McCaul said.
"The Building Chips in America Act will cement the intention of the CHIPS Act by ensuring timely production of these critical national security assets, creating thousands of American manufacturing jobs in the process. I am proud the House passed this crucial bill, which will solidify the United States’ global leadership in the semiconductor industry," the lawmaker added.
Despite the enthusiasm for the bill on Capitol Hill, environmental groups have hammered Biden, Politico reported. The Building Chips in America Act has eliminated many environmental requirements that would slow down the construction of these semiconductor manufacturing facilities.
Environmental groups believe that's a mistake. On Monday, the Sierra Club and more than two dozen environmental protection organizations sent a letter to Biden warning that if he signed the legislation, it would be bad for his legacy and the environment.
"President Biden should veto this. I expect he will veto it," Harry Manin, deputy deputy legislative director of industrial policy at the Sierra Club, told Politico. Labor groups are also concerned about new manufacturing facilities that could be unsafe for workers.
“It’s a missed opportunity. We don’t want to see the legacy of the CHIPS and Science Act being workers getting sick because of toxic chemicals on the job, or children in nearby schools and communities getting sick because of air pollution, or residents with poisoned wells and aquifers," warned Judith Barish, who coordinates a coalition of labor and environmental groups under CHIPS Communities United.
In Wilmington, North Carolina, former President Donald Trump aimed President Joe Biden for allowing First Lady Jill Biden to preside over a recent Cabinet meeting, NewsMax reported.
At a North Carolina rally, Trump leveraged Jill Biden's unusual role in a Cabinet meeting to challenge President Biden's leadership and promote his policy proposals.
The critique came during Trump's rally in Wilmington, where he openly questioned President Biden's current role and capacity. This rally was not only attended by supporters but also widely broadcast on Newsmax and its streaming service, Newsmax2.
Recently, Jill Biden was observed leading the first Cabinet meeting held by President Biden in almost a year. This meeting, which took place after their last one on October 2, 2023, featured the First Lady at the head of the table, a position typically reserved for the President himself.
Trump used this occurrence to cast doubt on Biden's ability to serve. "I don't know: Is he the president, because yesterday his wife took over the Cabinet meeting, right? He said, 'I'm going to ask my wife to take it,'" Trump recounted during the rally.
Amidst his criticism, Trump also took the opportunity to outline his own policy initiatives if re-elected. His economic agenda focused primarily on significant tax relief aimed at benefiting workers, seniors, and consumers alike.
Trump detailed plans for eliminating taxes on tips and overtime pay, along with exempting Social Security benefits from taxation. He proposed, "We will have no tax on tips. We will have no tax on overtime. And no tax on Social Security benefits for our great seniors."
Furthermore, he highlighted a plan to cap credit card interest rates temporarily at 10%, aiming to ease the financial strain on American consumers, especially amidst ongoing inflation concerns. "And while working Americans catch up, we're going to put a temporary cap on interest rates on credit card debt at 10%," he explained.
Trump's comments at the rally highlight an ongoing theme in his political rhetoric: questioning the competence and fitness of President Biden to hold office. By focusing on the optics of Jill Biden running the Cabinet meeting, Trump aims to reinforce doubts about Biden's leadership capabilities.
"I don't know is he still the president? I'm trying to figure it out," Trump quipped, further mocking the situation by saying, "You know, I hate to waste the time by saying it."
These remarks serve to fuel the narrative of a presidency in question, which Trump and his supporters often use to contrast with his own leadership style and policy clarity.
The reaction to Jill Biden's role in the Cabinet meeting and Trump's subsequent comments may echo throughout the political landscape, influencing public perception and voter sentiment.
As the U.S. moves closer to the next election cycle, these events could potentially shape the strategies and messages of both the Democratic and Republican campaigns.
For now, the political discourse continues to be shaped by these significant and symbolic gestures, as leaders on both sides of the aisle position themselves in anticipation of upcoming electoral challenges.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The American economy, under the leadership of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, added only 142,000 jobs in August, far below expectations.
It was the next step in what analysts have called a "downward" trend.
Then unemployment also was reported at 4.2%, which while it is lower than the 9.1% seen earlier under the Biden-Harris regime which has left Americans paying some 21% more for the same lifestyle as when President Donald Trump was in office, still is far higher than when Trump turned the economy over to the Democrats.
Now a report in the Washington Examiner notes that America, under Biden and Harris, has been hit with a third strike: a massive plunge in consumer confidence.
"The Conference Board's consumer confidence index fell to 98.7 in September, down from 105.6 the month before, the group announced on Tuesday," the report said, calling it "another warning signal for Vice President Kamala Harris, who has been working to convince voters she is the right choice for president."
The report said the plunge was the biggest slide month-to-month since August 2021 for the numbers that assess consumers' opinions regarding the labor market and business conditions.
The report continued, "The expectations index, which is derived from consumers' short-term outlook for business, income, and labor market conditions, declined by 4.6 points to 81.7. If the index is below 80, it typically signals a recession ahead, according to the Conference Board."
Dana Peterson, economist for the board, said, "Consumer confidence dropped in September to near the bottom of the narrow range that has prevailed over the past two years. September's decline was the largest since August 2021 and all five components of the Index deteriorated. Consumers' assessments of current business conditions turned negative while views of the current labor market situation softened further."
A report from the Daily Caller News Foundation also noted that Art Laffer, an economist who worked with President Ronald Reagan, confirmed the rise in unemployment rates can be traced to the "bad policies," and that Trump's economic plan for his presidency would bring back growth.
Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell when he said only days ago the organization was lowering its federal funds rate by 0.5% confirmed that the Biden-Harris open borders agenda was allowing an "influx" across the border that was helping push unemployment rates up.
Laffer pointed out the problem with Powell's claims, the report said, citing a lack in growth in employment.
"If unemployment went up because of illegal immigrants coming in, wouldn't employment have gone up as well because they've come in — some of them get jobs, some of them don't in the labor force, but when you look at employment growth, it's been declining dramatically … and that's really the problem," Laffer said.
"The unemployment rate — and Trump is completely right, by the way, in this. The unemployment rate increases [are] because of bad policies not because of illegal immigrants. Their tax policies, their spending policies, have led to a decline in the rate of growth of the economy and lessened employment. And that's really a serious problem."
He suggested Trump's plans would "lead to enormous expansion of employment. I mean, you look at some of these things on the tips — no taxes on tips. You remove taxes from overtime, those are all marginal tax rate reductions that would have an enormous impact on jobs output. Can you imagine how many more service employees you'd find if you didn't get taxes on tips? Or how [much] overtime work we'd get — how much more we'd get if we didn't have taxes on overtime work?"
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Kamala Harris says that turning America in an abortion free-for-all is so important to her that she'd destroy the Senate filibuster in order to get it.
The filibuster is the longstanding practice in the chamber that requires support from at least 60 senators for a plan to advance.
Without it, a 51-49 majority could put anything into law, or in a federal court.
For instance, could a partisan like Merrick Garland, who has overseen the weaponization of the Department of Justice against President Donald Trump, ever gain the power of a Supreme Court post? Likely not with the filibuster, without it, easy.
USA Today reports Harris has confirmed she would support eliminating the filibuster "to reinstate abortion."
The report described the effort as reinstating the "abortion protections that were under Roe v. Wade," but that precedent, abandoned by the Supreme Court several years ago for not being based on the Constitution, allowed abortion at literally any time and under any circumstances.
"I think we should eliminate the filibuster for Roe," Harris during in an interview with Wisconsin Public Radio. "And get us to the point where 51 votes would be what we need to actually put back into law, the protections for reproductive freedom."
Those "protections" for "reproductive freedom" include a vast array of ways and times to kill the unborn, and according to some Democrats, even those who already have been born.
Just the News confirmed that Harris' anti-filibuster agenda has been in place since the 2022 Supreme Court Dobbs ruling confirmed that the nearly 50-year-old Roe ideology was not constitutional.
Newsweek reported a leftist commentator confirmed that Harris' comment shows "the value she puts on about codifying Roe."
In fact, for years already, Harris has insisted, regarding an abortion-at-will nation, "If the filibuster gets in the way, the Senate needs to make an exception to get this done."
One of the problems eliminating the filibuster would create, though, is that a Democrat majority of 51 could adopt anything at the time, but then be reversed immediately with a 51-vote GOP majority a year or two later, creating an atmosphere for virtually unending flip-flops in U.S. law.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Just as it has been confirmed yet another man is charged with threatening the life of President Donald Trump, tech billionaire Elon Musk has posted on his Twitter social media site a series of video statements from Democrats demanding exactly that.
"It serves as a terrifying reminder that Democrats don't just want to beat Trump, they want him gone … by any means necessary. Hey, we're not the ones saying it, THEY are. We can hear it directly from them," explained a commentary at Twitchy.
The video includes wild claims by Joe Biden about Trump being a threat to democracy.
And the threat, "They're still going to have to go and put a bullet in Donald Trump."
And twice-failed Democratic White House hopeful Hillary Clinton complaining how "dangerous" Trump is.
And an official White House statement about the "threat" Trump is.
"What's REALLY disturbing is how much of this was taken from people like Hillary Clinton even after the first or SECOND attempt on Trump's life proving they have no intention of taking the rhetoric down. Again, proving they'll do anything to anyone to stay in power," the commentary explained.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The "New York City COVID Czar" who was caught on video confessing that he held sex parties at the same time he was locking the city down now has been fired.
A report by talk show host Steven Crowder confirms that "Former NYC COVIFD Czar" Jay Varma, who formerly was a senior adviser for public health to the New York City mayor, was canned by SigaTech.
The corporation's own announcement said, "On September 23, 2024, the board of directors of SIGA Technologies (NASDAQ: SIGA) terminated Dr. Jay Varma, effective immediately, other than for cause, from his position as executive vice president and chief medical officer of the company. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Dr. Varma's service on the company's board of directors also automatically ended effective immediately."
The reasons appeared to be self-evident:
Crowder reported that Varma confirmed "New Yorkers would have been 'p—–' if they found out because he was running entire COVID response for city."
"I had to be kind of sneaky about it…I was running the entire Covid response for the city…we rented a hotel…we all took like, you know, molly[E*stasy/MDMA] … 8 to 10 of us were in a room…like just being naked with friends…"," he said on the video.
He claimed the need to "blow off steam every now and then."
Social media commenters called the action a good first step.
At Revolver was the comment: "He was the guy deciding if you could leave your house or not. And now, thanks to a glorious hidden camera confession shared by right-wing influencer Steven Crowder, we now know Dr. Varma was lying to everyone the entire time. While he was telling you to stay home and destroying kids' lives by keeping them out of school, this sick and twisted 'doctor' was partying it up at underground sex clubs, spreading his disgusting DNA everywhere."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
In a move that could signal the beginning of the end for the expensive and unreliable Biden-Harris green energy ideology, 14 of the world's biggest banks have announced they are lining up behind President Donald Trump's plans for nuclear energy in the world's future.
Online reporting cited documentation of the plans by the Financial Times:
The statement said, "Banks and funds totaling $14 TRILLION in assets have just signed an unprecedented statement in support of nuclear power. They'll be presenting the pledge to support the goal of tripling nuclear THIS MORNING at the Rockefeller Center in New York City to kick off NY Climate Week."
It continued, "A few of the names: Bank of America, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Brookfield, Citi, Credit Agricole, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Rothschild & Co. The pledge comes after Microsoft signs deal to buy $16 billion in electricity from a revived Three Mile Island nuclear plant alone over 20 years to fuel its AI ambitions."
Trump just weeks ago had chosen his agenda:
He said, "Nuclear now has become very good, very safe, and you build the smaller plants and you attach them… Nuclear is very powerful, very good."
Revolver News said, "It might be time to wave bye-bye to the Marxist 'Green New Deal' and say HELLO to nuclear power. The world's top banks have had enough of the green nightmare and are now pledging their support for nuclear energy. The Harris/Biden regime just took a direct nuclear hit to their tyrannical green agenda, and they may never recover. Actually, to get an idea of how deep this goes, BNP told the 'Financial Times' there's 'no scenario' where the world can hit carbon neutrality by 2050 without nuclear power. In addition, Barclays is also board. They believe that nuclear power could solve the problem of unreliable wind and solar energy. In other words, the global elites' green plan is an epic failure—just like many of us predicted long ago."
"This event is going to be a game-changer," George Borovas, involved in nuclear projects for the law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth, told the Financial Times. He said until now support for nuclear projects has been difficult because the senior managers would just say they don't understand it and it's controversial.
He said now banks could normalize nuclear energy as "part of the solution for climate change."
Various renewable industries, from solar panels to wind turbines, all have proven to be very expensive. Further, they cannot be considered reliable, as the sun doesn't always shine and the wind doesn't always blow.