Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi admitted she was responsible for not securing the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in video footage taken in the aftermath, the American Military News reported. Former President Donald Trump, who was blamed for the uprising, expressed sympathy for Pelosi's daughter who captured the footage.
Democrats have been hammering Trump about allegedly inciting the riot that day. Newly released footage taken by Alexandra Pelosi has revealed that Nancy Pelosi knew she had a hand in the debacle, and Trump took to Truth Social to share how it happened.
"BIG NEWS: Nancy Pelosi has been EXPOSED on tape, during her daughter’s documentary, saying she, and she alone, is 'responsible' for the events of January 6th, 2021. Can you imagine how that poor and loving daughter has suffered for allowing the TRUTH to get released?" Trump wrote on Wednesday.
In June, the House Oversight Committee released never-before-seen footage of Pelosi speaking to her Chief of Staff Terri McCullough in the aftermath of the event, Fox News reported. "We have responsibility, Terri," a masked Pelosi said.
"We did not have any accountability for what was going on there. And we should have," she added
"This is ridiculous. You’re going to ask me in the middle of the thing when they’ve already breached…that, should we call the Capitol Police? I mean, the National Guard? Why weren’t the National Guard there to begin with?" Pelosi lamented.
McCullough attempted to assuage her guilt by saying the Capital Police had it all in hand. "They clearly didn’t know, and I take responsibility for not having them just prepared for more." Pelosi shot back.
🚨 Since January 6, 2021, Nancy Pelosi spent 3+ years and nearly $20 million creating a narrative to blame Donald Trump.
NEW FOOTAGE shows on January 6, Pelosi ADMITTED:
"I take responsibility."
WATCH: pic.twitter.com/95a0totTWB
— Oversight Subcommittee (@OversightAdmn) June 10, 2024
Even as Pelosi admitted to her failures on film, she implicated Trump's supporters. "It’s stupid that we should be in a situation like this, because they thought they had what- they thought these people would act civilized?" Pelosi said.
"They thought these people would give a damn? What is it that is missing here in terms of anticipation? They give us a piece of paper that says walk through the tunnel, don’t walk outside. That’s your preparation?" the then-House Speaker added.
The competing narratives somehow fit nicely into an agenda Nancy Pelosi created from the event in the years after. Georgia GOP Rep. Barry Loudermilk railed against Pelosi and the House's January 6 select committee for holding back on the revelations in this footage.
"As Nancy Pelosi was being evacuated from the Capitol on January 6, 2021, she admitted that, as Speaker of the House, she was ultimately responsible for the security failures and for not having the National Guard at the Capitol that day. Then, she proceeded to spend nearly 20 million of taxpayer dollars for her Select Committee to blame President Trump for her failures," Loudermilk, chairman of the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, said.
Pelosi's admission on the day of the riot reveals that there was more to the story than the narrative she has been pushing to smear Trump. Unfortunately for Nancy Pelosi, her daughter captured footage of her telling the truth that undermines her case against Trump.
President Joe Biden shocked the White House press briefing room last week by showing up to take questions for the first time in his entire presidency.
Of course, his presence in the room generated a mountain of headlines given the awkward exchanges he had with reporters and especially the part where he joked about being back in the 2024 presidential race.
According to the Daily Mail, several of the journalists in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room gasped when the 81-year-old president walked in instead of the usual, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.
The president entered the room with the intention of talking about new jobs numbers that the administration believes are favorable, but instead took questions about the situation in the Middle East and the government's response to Hurricane Helene cleanup.
Biden took several questions, with many being about Israel's likely counterattack to Iran's surprise missile barrage last week.
"If I were in their shoes, I'd be thinking about an alternative to striking oil fields," Biden said when asked whether or not he believes an Israeli strike on Iranian oil fields would be on the table.
Biden commented on the though of some Democrats in that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was pushing off a ceasefire deal to meddle in the U.S. election.
"No administration has helped Israel more than I have. None, none, none," Biden replied. "And I think Bibi should remember that if if he's trying to influence the election or not. I don't know, but I'm not counting on that."
JUST IN: White House briefing room descends into chaos as President Biden stands in front of shouting reporters, not knowing who to call on.
Press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre jumped in to save Biden as reporters shouted at him, trying to ask questions.
At one point during the… pic.twitter.com/XyC2L73s7R
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 4, 2024
While his questions certainly made for news stories, it was his parting "joke" that raised the most eyebrows.
As he was walking out, Biden was asked whether he was reconsidering his decision to drop out of the presidential race.
"I'm back in," the president reportedly joked.
Some on social media believe Biden is working overtime to troll Vice President Kamala Harris and enact some level of revenge for her swooping in and taking his presidential reelection crown.
Biden also took jabs at "MAGA Republicans" during his brief appearance.
The anti-Trump left and right are scared to death about the former president winning in November and they're ready and willing to spread as much negative propaganda as possible to stop him.
According to Breitbart, Atlantic contributor George Conway, who's afflicted with one of the worst cases of Trump Derangement Syndrome, made some of the most ridiculous statements possible in recent days.
During a recent interview on MSNBC’s "Alex Wagner Tonight," Conway invoked Adolf Hitler when describing the former president.
The two were discussing Trump's response to the Biden administration's response -- or lack thereof -- to the devastation left by Hurricane Helene.
The discussion between Wagner and Conway quickly devolved, which was not surprising to anyone.
"You’re a student of Trump’s strange psyche. What does the clearly confessional nature of these accusations tell you about, I don’t know, where his head is at right now?” Wagner said.
Conway responded, "Well, you know, you’re absolutely right. It’s a form of projection. He attributes to others motives that he himself has. But it’s more than that."
He continued into the Hitler stuff, which was beyond ridiculous
“The words that came to mind when I read about this controversy today is the große Lüge. That is German. I don’t speak German so forgive my pronunciation. But große Lüge is big lie, it means big lie. It was a phrase coined by Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf in 1925 for a propaganda technique by which you tell as big a lie as possible so that people will believe bigger lies," he said.
Conway added, "They will believe bigger lies more than they believe smaller lies because they simply think it’s impossible for anybody to have the temerity to tell such an amazingly large lie. But Donald Trump does that as a matter of course. He’s a pathological liar and a sociopath."
Conway described Trump's rhetoric as "cancer."
"His lies about the supposedly stolen election in 2020 were große Lüge. This is what he does and it is why he’s a cancer on the American political life that must be removed once and for all," Conway added.
As Trump continues to hold steady and gain momentum in the lead-up to the election, especially thanks to his running mate, Sen. J.D. Vance, liberals like Conway will say whatever they want without consequence.
Only time will tell if it works. d
Nancy Pelosi's betrayal of Joe Biden opened a deep rift that doesn't show any signs of healing, as Biden and his wife "Doctor Jill" largely withdraw from the national spotlight following his humiliating decision to end his re-election bid.
As the presidential matchup between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris enters the final stretch, Jill Biden "has largely withdrawn from campaign events, and Harris' team hasn't pushed for her to do them," Axios reported.
Jill Biden had been a highly active surrogate for her husband's re-election bid, traveling from state to state as speculation bubbled over his mental fitness.
Following a disastrous debate performance on CNN, Joe Biden was unceremoniously pressured to end his re-election bid by his longtime friend, Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca.).
Supported by his tight-knight family, Biden initially resisted pressure to drop out, but changed his mind after Pelosi threatened to go public with her concerns about his political viability, the Daily Mail reported.
The strong-arming destroyed a decades-old relationship, leaving Biden and his wife deeply resentful.
Biden didn't linger at the Democratic National Convention in August, where he suffered the indignity of having his speech bumped out of primetime. His wife gave a brief speech, lasting just five minutes.
As Biden faces the end of his presidency, his wife has been more visible at government events, including a recent Cabinet meeting that she hosted, stoking further speculation about who is running the country.
Jo Biden "hasn't scheduled public events in 43 of the 75 days since he dropped his re-election bid," and Kamala Harris has brought him to just one campaign event, Axios reported.
The lame-duck president is faced with a host of crises, including mounting tensions in the Middle East and a devastating hurricane in the American Southeast that has become the deadliest since Katrina in 2003.
In a surprise, Joe Biden showed up to the White House briefing room for the first time on Friday to take questions from reporters. There, Biden touted a new jobs report and seemingly sabotaged Harris' attempts to distance herself from his unpopular legacy.
"I’m in constant contact with her. She’s aware. We’re singing from the same song sheet," Biden said. "She helped pass all of the laws that are being employed now, she was a major player in everything we’ve done."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A prominent publisher of science research is being challenged in court after moving to suppress science-based details about the dangers of abortion, according to a new report at the Federalist.
The fight now in Superior Court in Ventura, California, is over a decision by Sage Publications to move to retract three key studies "exposing the dangers of the nation's most popular abortion drug regiment," the report explained.
It's happening just as the U.S. Supreme Court is approaching a case involving the drug, mifepristone.
The report explained 10 of the researchers who delivered in three scientific papers their conclusions about the threat to lives have now filed a petition to compel arbitration.
They accuse the publisher of "pretextual and discriminatory" comments that were created to support retracting the findings on the abortion pill. The authors provided science to back their original writings, but Sage ignored it.
"One of the studies in question, which the lawsuit notes is 'the second most-read article' in the journal's history, specifically determined mifepristone is responsible for a 500 percent increase in abortion-related emergency room visits," the Federalist reported.
The censorship campaign is suspect for several reasons, not the least of which is the fact the papers were done in 2019, 2021 and 2022 and "originally passed peer review for publication without a hitch."
In fact, Sage emailed Dr. James Studnicki, who headed the 2021 and 2022 projects, and commended him for his "fine contributions."
But this year, amid a re-election year that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris both have participated in, with their extreme pro-abortion positions, the publisher suddenly claimed that it was acting on a "reader's concern" that the authors had a conflict of interest over some "pro-life organizations."
"Abortion activist researchers publish plenty of papers on the topic without scrutiny. Yet Sage, after what it called an 'independent review,' ultimately followed through with the retractions," the report said.
The challenge, now in court, charges, "Sage's wrongdoing has been causing enormous and incalculable harm to the Authors' professional reputations, as Sage intended. Because of Sage's retractions, the Authors and their research have been attacked by the media and by other authors, and the Authors have had new research proposals inexplicably turned away by other publications that now fear associating with them. The Authors have years — even decades — of fruitful research ahead of them, but they are now being treated as pariahs."
The Charlotte Lozier Institute found that Sage's claims provided "no evidence" of any major "errors, miscalculations or falsehoods" in the reports.
Further, the authors "fully complied" with the publications "conflict disclosure requirements."
The researchers had called for arbitration on the disagreement but the report said Sage delayed the process by making demands that were unrelated to the issue at hand.
"Even more concerning, Sage has used its intransigence as a weapon to try to pressure the Authors into unilaterally surrendering their discovery rights. Sage's egregious actions require this Court's intervention to compel arbitration," the lawsuit charges.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A producer/writer for an MSNBC show has confirmed that the network is doing "all they can" to elect Kamala Harris.
The confirmation of what many Americans already believe, that legacy media is more or less a branch of the Democrat Party already, comes from Basel Hamdan, who works on the "Ayman" show for MSNBC.
His comments were captured by the O'Keefe Media Group, run by investigative reporter James O'Keefe.
OMG reports Hamdan was asked, by an undercover journalist, "what the network has done to assist the Kamala Harris campaign."
"Hamdan revealed on hidden camera that 'what her [Harris's] message of the day is, is their message of the day,' as MSNBC actively pushes Harris's narrative to help her win," OMG reported.
OMG reports Hamdan was asked, by an undercover journalist, "what the network has done to assist the Kamala Harris campaign."
"Hamdan revealed on hidden camera that 'what her [Harris's] message of the day is, is their message of the day,' as MSNBC actively pushes Harris's narrative to help her win," OMG reported.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s famous actress wife, Cheryl Hines, wants a divorce after she was "blindsided" by his extramarital affair with a journalist.
The Curb Your Enthusiasm actress believed her husband's "philandering" days were over when his texting relationship with journalist Olivia Nuzzi surfaced, Kennedy biographer Jerry Oppenheimer reported in the Daily Mail.
A longtime friend of Hines told the Daily Mail that she had no illusions about Kennedy's sexual compulsions when she married him - their relationship had started as an affair when Kennedy was still married to his second wife Mary Richardson.
In 2012, Richardson killed herself while divorcing Kennedy, whose diary Richardson had discovered. In it, he recorded affairs with 37 women and talked about "lust demons."
Hines had believed her 70-year-old husband had conquered his family's famous vice when the Nuzzi scandal emerged. Now, Hines is "thoroughly embarrassed and furious about his adulterous actions" and "she wants out."
"Cheryl was always very aware that Bobby had a long history of womanizing. She herself had become very publicly involved with him when he was still married to his second wife, so his playing around wasn’t anything new to her," a friend told the Daily Mail.
“However, she firmly believed Bobby, in his seventh decade and with political aspirations, finally had his sex demons under control, and appeared settled down in their seemingly bucolic Southern California domestic life.”
"But she now feels totally blindsided and humiliated. His affair with that woman, Olivia Nuzzi, has wreaked-havoc on their marriage."
Sources previously told PageSix that the septuagenarian Casanova "love bombed" Nuzzi, who met Kennedy while covering his independent presidential campaign - and that they carried on an intimate affair over the phone.
Kennedy has denied the affair took place, with friends of his portraying Nuzzi as the instigator of the relationship.
Kennedy faced backlash from his party and his own famous Democratic family after suspending his campaign to endorse President Trump in August. Democrats shamed Hines, as well, who Kennedy admitted wasn't thrilled about his decision.
The endorsement has added tension to their marriage, sources told PageSix. Indeed, some allege that Hines, a lifelong Democrat, had made peace with her husband's wandering eye and is considering a divorce mainly because of his political conversion.
“She knew she was getting in with a Kennedy, who are known for being infamous womanizers,” said a source. “But she never signed up to be a member of Trump World!”
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A federal judge has shot down, at least temporarily, California Gov. Gavin Newsom's ban on political parody online.
The Washington Examiner describe the state's newest censorship law as an attempt to hold down "political disinformation."
"The ruling is the result of a lawsuit filed by Chris Kohls, known as 'Mr Reagan' on X. Kohls is the original poster of an AI video that replicated Vice President Kamala Harris' voice and went viral on X this summer. The video caught Newsom's attention and prompted him to create the law. X owner Elon Musk reposted the video, making it even more widespread."
He said the law, a "hammer" in his opinion, "hinders humorous expression and unconstitutionally stifles the free and unfettered exchange of ideas."
WND had reported only a day earlier on a request from a legal team from the ADF for the parody ban be halted.
"California's war against political memes is censorship, plain and simple. We shouldn't trust the government to decide what is true in our online political debates. Gov. Gavin Newsom recently signed two laws punishing political speech, with one law taking effect immediately, just as the election season heated up – a time when we need more speech, not less," explained Jonathan Scruggs, a lawyer with the organization.
"That includes political parody and satire, a type of expression that has been used throughout our nation's history. While lawmakers act as if posting and sharing memes is a threat to democracy, these laws target speech California officials don't like."
WND previously reported as the battle heated up and Newsom, who has faced mockery for his state's high taxes, extremism on social issues like abortion and transgenderism, attempts to interfere with other states and their rights, took chutzpah to a new level.
That, by the way, derives from a Hebrew word meaning "insolence," "cheek" or "audacity."
He signed a law banning parody.
The report said video creator Christopher Kohls is charging Newsom with violations of the First and 14th Amendments with Newsom's "anti-deepfake measure" that was signed into law this week.
California's governor was offended by a parody released by "Mr. Reagan" recently:
In it "Kamala Harris" confirms she is the Democrat candidate for president because Joe Biden "exposed his senility at the debate."
She confesses she is the "ultimate diversity hire," as a woman and a "person of color."
"So if you criticize anything I say you're both sexist and racist."
The mockery continues.
The video uses AI-generated audio clips, and it was shared by Elon Musk, collecting more than 100 million views.
Newsom responded:
The lawsuit in federal court in California charges that Newsom's scheme is a flagrant use of "state power to force private social media companies to censor private citizens' speech by purging election-related AI-generated content."
Musk's comment? "You're not gonna believe this, but Gavin Newsom, just announced that he signed a LAW to make parody illegal, based on this video."
He concludes California needs "new leadership."
However, taking on Newsom directly was the Babylon Bee, which prominently announced it has "'obtained this exclusive, official, 100% real Gavin Newsom election ad."
In it, "Newsom" states:
This is a message for the people of America, given in my authentically recorded non-AI voice. Thanks to my leadership over the last several years, California has become a world leader in extremist left-wing governance. My policies were so effective that almost 1 million people are now fleeing the state every year. We even ran out of U-Hauls.
During the COVID pandemic, I locked everyone in their homes and shut down businesses for months. Not the French Laundry, though. That's my favorite restaurant. Last year, I cleaned up the dangerous, messy streets of San Francisco. You know, because Chinese Communist President Xi was coming. And I really wanted to impress him. He's my boss, after all.
This year, I signed legislation that allows me to take custody of your kid if you refuse to give him artificial hormones and chop off his genitals. Because if you don't do that, you're a bigot. And bigots shouldn't be allowed to have kids. I've also led the way in green energy by banning all cars that don't run on electricity. Then I banned almost all the electricity. This is smart leadership.
On my watch, the cost of living and homelessness have skyrocketed. Schools are failing. Drug dealers and human traffickers are pouring across the border. And poop has covered the sidewalks of San Francisco. This is the positive, joyful vision we offer as Democrats.
That's why I'm enthusiastically endorsing Kamala Harris for president in 2024. She'll do to the country everything I did in California. Anyway, I'm California Governor Gavin Newsom, and I approve this 100% real message, which is a recording of my voice without the assistance of any AI whatsoever.
This isn't a deepfake. And you can rest assured that it isn't, because I just signed an unconstitutional law outlawing deepfakes. No one would dare violate it. Thank you, and science bless America.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A Democrat-run lawfare campaign against President Donald Trump, which largely has been endorsed by a federal judge through her one-sided rulings, is being condemned as "bad detective fiction."
An expert on constitutional disputes explained, "A lot of it is irrelevant and inadmissible. … It seems like deliberate election interference."
WND has reported a federal judge in Washington, who has established her own bias by repeatedly and publicly criticizing and condemning Trump, has taken Jack Smith's edited claims against Trump regarding the 2020 election and shoved them at voters just in time for Democrats to use them in their campaign against him.
Department of Justice standards previously have been that no such case, no such motion should be made public in the immediate runup to an election, when that case could affect the election.
The players here, Chutkan and Smith, apparently have abandoned that level of nonpartisanship.
The motion came about because Chutkan, in a hurry to try make the most of the attack on Trump, ruled earlier that Trump had no immunity for his actions as president. But she didn't establish any sort of evidence on the dispute. The Supreme Court pointed that out when it confirmed Trump does have various levels of immunity at different times, and it sent the case back to Chutkan.
Smith, appointed by Merrick Garland's Department of Justice to carry out this arm of the lawfare that has been assembled against Trump, submitted his claims now that Trump was a "private" individual for all regards concerning his re-election.
"The point of this was to try to get this information, which has been hashed out again and again before the American people. None of this is new, but the idea was to get the evidence out in as spectacular a way as possible. And by Smith's light, hopefully get Trump convicted in the run-up to the election in hopes of influencing the outcome of the election. And now we have the release of this book-length size recitation of Smith's case under circumstances where there is no possibility of having this trial before November and there was no reason to have it brought out in public now," McCarthy said.
He continued, "In fact, in most cases, a judge would be concerned about, for example, poisoning or prejudicing against the defendant a jury pool. In most cases a judge would be very concerned that evidence not be broadcast in public without the usual due process cautions that go on in a trial that the defendant be presumed innocent, the fact that allegations are not evidence of anything.
"The point of releasing this now can only be to affect the election. There is no legal need for it."
The Daily Caller News Foundation also noted that it was Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett who likened Smith's filing to "bad detective fiction" and using it to influence the election.
He explained,. "Yeah, he's trying to have a damning trial of Trump without a trial in the face of the fact that he couldn't get a trial before the election. And, you know, releasing this motion, this court filing, it sure looks like blatant election interference."
He said, "Trump's lawyers urged the judge, keep it sealed. It will impact the election. The judge did it anyway with almost no discussion and there's no good reason to make it public. It's premature. There isn't even a trial date. So, I think this was done knowing full well media and Democrats would seize on provocative details, publicize it to affect voters and damage Trump and sure enough, as I looked at television, the internet and newspapers, that's what's happening."
He said, "At times it reads like bad detective fiction. A lot of it is irrelevant and inadmissible. Conversations that other people had that are not connected to Trump directly. So, it seems like deliberate election interference and the incendiary details notwithstanding, Smith's basic accusations are the same that we have heard all along. Nothing has changed, the theme that Trump deceived people, well, if he honestly believed he won, it's hard to prove otherwise."
Smith's claims include, "The defendant asserts that he is immune from prosecution for his criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 presidential election because, he claims, it entailed official conduct. Not so. Although the defendant was the incumbent President during the charged conspiracies, his scheme was fundamentally a private one. Working with a team of private co-conspirators, the defendant acted as a candidate when he pursued multiple criminal means to disrupt, through fraud and deceit, the government function by which votes are collected and counted—a function in which the defendant, as President, had no official role," the Gateway Pundit quoted.
In fact, many of Trump's actions and comments were, in fact, as president, not a private individual.
Article III Project founder Mike Davis explained, on Chutkan's newest "lawfare" against Trump.
"The Biden-Harris Justice Department waited nearly three years to bring two unprecedented indictments against their bosses' former and future chief political opponent. Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, halted this unprecedented lawfare and obvious election interference."
He added, "Undeterred by these major legal setbacks, the Biden-Harris DOJ and DC Obama Judge Tanya Chutkan are unnecessarily and shamefully releasing a one-sided political story—for the non-crime of objecting to a presidential election just like Democrats did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017—during the height of 2024 presidential election season.
"The American people—not partisan Democrat prosecutors, judges, witnesses, and other operatives in Democrat hellholes like DC—get to decide the presidential election."
He called for Trump, if president in January 2025, to have the DOJ "fully investigate this criminal conspiracy against rights."
WND had reported only hours earlier on a commentary that explained there were multiple suspicious circumstances of that election:
– President Donald Trump set a record for votes, but career political hack Joe Biden got MILLIONS more? That would be millions more votes than the super-popular Barack Obama had gotten previously.
– State and local elections officials repeatedly broke their own state laws to count votes during COVID, including accepting ballots long after the legal deadline had passed.
– Mark Zuckerberg handed out some $400 million to local elections officials to help with deal with election requirements, and those officials often used the flood of cash to recruit Democrat voters, a campaign financing scandal that now is illegal in some states.
– The FBI and other federal agencies, conspiring with major media and tech corporations, falsely claimed that the details about the Biden family scandals documented in Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop were disinformation, and ordered the details suppressed. The scandals were true.
– A later polling showed that had that information been available ordinarily, enough voters would have withheld their support from Joe Biden to cause him to lose the election.
– Multiple lawsuits alleging elections misbehavior simply were tossed by judges who claimed the plaintiffs had no "standing," or valid interest in the alleged wrongdoing, so the actual claims, the merits of the lawsuits, never were addressed.
Even so, Democrats have claimed those who have doubts are "insurrectionists," leftist judges have used those thoughts against those who trespassed at the Capitol in Washington on January 6, 2021, and extremists like Colorado's secretary of state, Jena Griswold, even have campaigned to ban Trump from the ballot over the issue.
Now Julie Kelly, a Real Clear Investigations researcher and writer and self-described "insurrection denier," explains online that those opinions are legitimate.
She wrote, "DOJ and federal judges have made election 'denial' a crime in Washington. J6ers texts and memes about the 2020 election are used as incriminating evidence and reason for excessive sentences. Judges routinely berate J6ers for believing 'lies' from a 'charlatan' that the 2020 election was stolen.
"Except it's not a crime to believe the 2020 election was illegitimate because it was. Two-thirds of Republicans still believe it was an unlawful election; independents have trended in that direction over the past 4 years."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Under the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris agenda of promoting the far-left ideology of transgenderism, schools have forced girls to allow boys to be on their athletic teams, in motel rooms with them on trips and in their showers.
It's happened at multiple levels from grade school to university, where national governing bodies have submitted to the falsehood that males can become females. In fact, under the science, being male or female is embedded in the body down to the DNA level and does not change.
Too, there already have been injuries to females on such teams because of the greater muscle mass and athletic performance of males.
Of course multiple lawsuits have been begun, and the Supreme Court has yet to issue a determining rule.
But that ultimately may be unnecessary, as those involved already have started delivering their judgment. In fact, multiple teams now have refused to play a "women's" volleyball team from San Jose State because it includes a male who says he is female.
The presence of the man calling himself Blaire Fleming on that team means that his teammates will not be able to enjoy the competition for which they have trained. And the women on the other teams also will be deprived of the competition for which they have trained.
A report at ZeroHedge explains two of the most recent announcements came from Boise State and the University of Wyoming.
Those teams are "forfeiting" their games rather than play San Jose State, which recently advanced its record to 9-0 for the season after being given the "victory" in games that were not played.
The Wyoming team said, "After a lengthy discussion, the University of Wyoming will not play its scheduled conference match against San José State University in the UniWyo Sports Complex on Saturday, Oct. 5. Per Mountain West Conference policy, the Conference will record the match as a forfeit and a loss for Wyoming."
The report noted Wyoming first had said the game would be played, "but reversed that decision after state legislators began organizing a letter to the university's president and athletic director."
Former Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines, who was among the first to launch a revolt against males on women's sports teams, applauded the latest developments in the social and moral contest over adopting the ideology that men can simply call themselves women, and be on women's teams.
Some of the legal actions already in play charge the NCAA with violating Title IX by allowing men on women's teams.
"The suit asserts that including male-to-female trans players not only disadvantages women but also presents a safety hazard…as highlighted in this video shared by Republican Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn:"
Earlier Southern Utah forfeited a scheduled match with San Jose.
A report at Not the Bee said the fourth school to protest the male player was Utah State.
The report said, "Honestly, these girls just don't want to get hurt by Spartans redshirt junior Blaire Fleming. They know if they play against a biological male their chances of injury skyrocket due to the sheer power behind those spikes."
San Jose, in a statement, claimed officials were "disappointed" that athletes "are being denied opportunities to compete."
But now a governor has joined the conversation:
The Cowboy State Daily reported, "U.S. Rep. Harriet Hageman, a Republican and Wyoming's only delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives, voiced support for UW's ultimate decision in a Tuesday statement."
"I am proud of UW volleyball standing up to this nonsense," wrote Hageman. "We must do what it takes to protect our girls! I hope everyone will go support the team this season."
Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon also voiced support of the decision, saying, "It is important we stand for integrity and fairness in female athletics."
Lawmakers in that state warned their school: "The Legislature has been very clear that the University of Wyoming, being a publicly funded land grant institution, should not participate in the extremist agenda of Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI) or propagate the lie that biological sex can be changed. We all know it cannot."