This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Liz Cheney, an ex-congresswoman from Wyoming tossed out of office by her own voters, was a key to the partisan committee ex-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi created to try to find fault with President Donald Trump over the Jan. 6, 2021, protest-turned-riot in Washington.
Cheney famously sided with Democrats in a long list of votes and actions against Trump, who was impeached twice – and acquitted twice – on charges created by Democrats.
She was a leader of that J6 committee, and evidence shows she tried to skew the evidence to suppress information that exonerated Trump.
That's from the chief of the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, Rep. Barry Loudermilk, who cited new evidence that Cheney communicated with a key Jan. 6 witness behind her lawyer's back.
Loudermilk said that's among the issues that "may warrant future referrals to the Justice Department," the report explained.
His committee started investigating the previous committee's agenda, which supposedly was to explain the events of that day.
"Well, the main issue is exactly what you just laid out, that you have a member of Congress who is an attorney, who knows— I'm not an attorney, but I know at least you know some of the basics of attorney-client privilege and representation — that it's unethical, if not, in some cases illegal, you know, that you cannot have conversations or meetings with someone who already has representation without that attorney present," Loudermilk explained in an interview with John Solomon Reports.
"Cheney did not notify or seek permission from Hutchinson's defense counsel, which is unusual," the report confirmed.
And it explained, "The communications are the latest in a string of concerns Loudermilk's investigation has raised concerning the Democrat-run Jan. 6 Select Committee that finished its work in December 2022. His committee previously found that the select committee failed to preserve documents, data and video depositions from its investigation, including the video of Hutchinson's testimony."
Cheney's contacts with Hutchinson, Loudermilk confirmed, undermine the integrity of the Democrat-led campaign against Trump.
The report explained, "Loudermilk said Cheney may have taken the risk to contact Hutchinson, without her lawyer Stefan Passantino's knowledge, because her further testimony was essential to advance a preferred narrative about Jan. 6."
Experts explained to Just the News D.C. Bar rules that ban contact with a party being represented by another attorney may still control even when it's a congressional committee investigation.
But the normal practice would be to work through a legal representative, the report said.
"Just the News previously documented several of new narratives Hutchinson brought to the committee memorialized in an errata sheet, including the infamous story about then-President Trump allegedly grabbing the wheel of the presidential vehicle in anger after the Secret Service allegedly refused to take him to the Capitol. Errata sheets are sent by court or hearing stenographers to a witness, giving them the chance to correct typographic or minor errors. Hutchinson's 'errata' went far beyond that. Though this claim was directly refuted by the driver of the vehicle, the Democrat-run Jan. 6 Committee credited that information in its final report as being credible," the report said.
Former President Donald Trump made a bold claim during a recent town hall event, stating that he could reduce energy bills by 50% within a year, The Federalist reported.
Donald Trump made significant pledges concerning energy costs and public safety during a Fox News town hall focused on women's votes. The event, conducted in Georgia, was part of a series of discussions addressing critical domestic issues, such as inflation and crime.
During the town hall, moderated by Harris Faulkner, Trump linked the ongoing inflation crisis to the energy policies of the Biden administration. He criticized these policies, suggesting they contributed significantly to rising costs. Trump argued that reducing energy bills was crucial for resolving inflation impacts on the economy.
Trump articulated that energy issues were at the core of economic challenges, noting that the high inflation rate was unprecedented in four decades under the current administration. He traced the rise in prices to changes in energy policies, declaring, "Everything starts with interest rates," before emphasizing energy as a pivotal factor.
Faulkner, while discussing economic conditions, mentioned that although there had been some decrease in interest and inflation rates, the economy still faced incremental price hikes. Trump, however, attributed these complications mainly to the abandonment of his prior energy policies.
Trump confidently assured the audience of significant reductions in their energy bills starting January 20 of the following year. "Your energy bill, which is a very big bill, will be down 50 percent," he announced, reiterating his commitment to addressing these pressing economic issues.
Safety concerns were also discussed, as Trump responded to a troubling incident concerning the murder of University of Georgia student Laken Riley. The incident involved a suspected illegal immigrant, sparking fears about the safety of sanctuary cities, described as "Terrifying for all those kids" by a town hall participant.
In response to safety queries, Trump pledged to eliminate all sanctuary cities in the U.S., aiming to restore order and security. "We’re going to end all sanctuary cities," Trump promised, highlighting his commitment to addressing public safety and restoring comfort in communities.
Trump's remarks came prior to another town hall event on Univision aimed at Hispanic voters. This series of discussions aims to cover diverse perspectives and issues relevant to various voter demographics as Trump seeks support for potential future political endeavors.
Energy cost discussions are central to Trump's economic critique of the current administration. He suggested that excessive spending on initiatives like the Green New Deal resulted in economic strain, arguing that energy policies were pivotal in exacerbating inflation.
He further asserted that cutting energy costs would trigger a domino effect, reducing overall expenses and facilitating economic relief. "If your energy bills come down to half, that alone will bring everything down," Trump asserted, presenting his vision of economic improvement through energy reform.
Trump's promises come at a time when American citizens are grappling with financial pressures, notably at the gas pump. As record gas prices have strained household budgets, his proposal to significantly slash energy bills seeks to resonate with voters facing economic hardship.
As the town hall unfolded, Trump remained steadfast in articulating his economic strategies. His approach centers on reversing what he views as detrimental energy and economic policies currently in place. By focusing on energy, Trump positions his plans as a foundational shift needed to alleviate inflationary pressures.
These pledges align with Trump's broader commitment to economic reform and public safety, areas where he contends the current administration has fallen short. By critiquing current policies and outlining his vision, Trump seeks to attract voter support for his proposed policy changes.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Kamala Harris refused Thursday to attend the Al Smith charity dinner in New York, an event no presidential candidate has snubbed since Walter Mondale's absence in 1984, when he lost 49 of the 50 states in the election; but she sent a video.
And to make political points she mocked Christians, claimed an affinity to Catholics and even featured a misquote of the Bible.
She appears apparently starting to address to fundraising event, then was "interrupted" by an actress with some silly comments, leaving the result "cringey," according to an analysis by Matt Margolis of PJMedia.
And they took a decidedly juvenile bent, with the actress who "interrupted" Harris explaining, "Sometimes when I get nervous I stick my fingers under my arms and I sniff them…"
Her message, sexist throughout, was, "Don't you see, man, we need a woman to represent us. A woman brings more heart, more compassion, and think how smart she must be to become a top contender in a field dominated by men. It's time for a woman, bro."
Then the suggestion came, "Don't lie … Thou shall not bear false witness to thy neighbor."
Actually that's a misquote, as the verse is more widely explained as, "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor."
The PJMedia report explained the video address started serious, but then turned another direction with the appearance of actress Molly Shannon, in the role of a Saturday Night Live character Mary Katherine Gallagher.
Legendary musician Ringo Starr shared about his harrowing health ordeal that caused him to cancel tour dates, the Daily Caller reported. The former Beatles drummer did not share the exact cause, but that it felt he "had a mad thing eating my body."
The 84-year-old was forced to cancel the remaining dates of his All-Starr tour due to this severe illness. Reports circulated that he was fighting COVID-19.
In an interview with Variety, Starr set the record straight. "It wasn’t the virus — I had that two years ago," Starr said, though he admitted that it "knocked me down."
Instead, Starr described an unspecified malady that made him seriously ill. "It was a mad thing eating my body, and they found out when they took my blood that the white cells there was 12,000 of ’em," Starr said.
Starr explained that the high white cell count was a sign that he was gravely ill. "That’s pretty high. And that happens," Starr said.
"That’s what saved your life — they were fighting the attacker. And so with pills and medication, I got over it in two weeks," he added.
T. Bone Burnett, who was part of the interview with Starr, said the musician was otherwise in great condition despite his advanced age. "I saw him play at the Ryman a few months ago, and, he took a break in the middle and his dressing room was upstairs, and he ran up the stairs," he said.
"So I think he’s got plenty of miles left in him," Burnett added. Starr, whose career has spanned decades, is nowhere near stopping, as he will release another album next year.
View this post on Instagram
Starr continues to make music and perform, but his time with the Beatles still draws considerable curiosity. This fact has compelled Starr to be one of the producers of "Beatles '64" documentary, a retrospective look at the band by Martin Scorsese.
The Fab Four drummer sat down for an interview to talk about the documentary that will debut on Disney+ on November 29. "Honestly, it’s a little hard now. There’s only Paul and I, and it was the four of us…," he added.
Starr said that the newest documentary will feature post-Beatles works by Starr and Paul McCartney as he fondly remembered the original 1964 film that documented the Fab Four's visit to America. Brothers Albert and David Maysles captured footage that became "What's Happening! The Beatles in the U.S.A." about the band.
This time, Starr and McCartney will get to tell the story more from their perspectives. "Marty is producing this remake with his director of choice and putting us more in it to talk about that, so you’ve got that time and this time talking about that time," Starr shared.
Sixty years after the Beatles exploded in popularity, one of its remaining members is still as relevant as ever in his own right. Starr may have had his health challenges, but the world hasn't heard the last of him yet.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Michael Cohen, a New York lawyer who once worked for Donald Trump and later established his character by pleading guilty to charges including tax fraud, campaign finance violations and lying to Congress, now is being held out as an expert by MSNBC.
There, he is given a platform to express his dislike of Trump, and stunningly claims that Trump, in the office of president, will destroy America's court system and Congress.
Cohen earlier was sentenced to three years in prison, and most recently, was a star witness in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's suspect business violation claims against Trump.
A leftist jury, guided by a leftist judge whose daughter was making money off her father's courtroom decisions and who now is under investigation for his behavior during the trial, convicted Trump and the case now is on appeal.
But MSNBC wanted Cohen's opinion and he delivered:
He said, "If, in fact, Trump wins and he does exactly what he says he's going to do rewrite the Constitution and he's going to destroy our tripartite system, get rid of the judiciary, and get rid of the Congress."
The MSNBC interviewer suggested such scandals already have taken place, but didn't explain that if it was Trump's agenda to rid the nation of the courts and Congress, why didn't he do it during the four years he was president.
Trending Politics reported that earlier, Cohen had promised that "he will be changing his name and leaving the country if Trump returns to the White House in January."
An editorial at Twitchy pointed out: "Bro, Trump has said nothing even remotely like this. But Kamala and Democrats have. Maybe he's not smart enough to know Trump from Kamala? Or maybe he thinks people watching him on MSNBC are stupid enough to believe him. We hate to break it to Michael, but the mouth-breathers watching him on that network are already voting for Kamala."
In a significant move before the 2024 election, the Biden administration has declared the cancellation of student loans for upwards of 60,000 public service workers, offering relief totaling $4.5 billion.
This measure is part of an ongoing effort that has provided substantial financial relief to over one million public service workers, culminating in approximately $175 billion in student loan forgiveness since the beginning of the administration.
The timing of the announcement, coming just days before a pivotal national election, highlights the continuing focus of the Biden administration on delivering on student debt relief promises amidst an often polarized political climate.
The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program has undergone considerable changes since President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris assumed office. Prior to their tenure, the program struggled with implementation issues, evidenced by the fact that only 7,000 people had their loans forgiven.
Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona noted, "Before President Biden and Vice President Harris entered the White House, the PSLF program was so riddled by dysfunction that just 7,000 Americans ever qualified, and countless public servants were trapped making payments on debts that should have been forgiven."
In the past few years, the administration has prioritized fixing these longstanding issues, resulting in over one million public service employees receiving debt forgiveness. This group includes teachers, nurses, social workers, and veterans, among others.
The latest debt relief adds to a series of student loan cancellations under the current administration. In May, the White House forgave debts totaling $7.7 billion for 160,000 individuals. Also, in April, 270,000 borrowers benefitted from debt cancellation under the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan.
The PSLF program changes have amassed a total of $175 billion in relief, fundamentally transforming financial outlooks for many public service workers. According to Cardona, "From Day One, the Biden-Harris administration made fixing this broken program a top priority, and today, I'm tremendously proud that over one million teachers, nurses, social workers, veterans, and other public servants have received life-changing loan forgiveness."
Unlike some of the administration's previous debt relief efforts, this initiative is unlikely to face legal challenges due to its foundation on a distinct legal authority. This strategic choice may represent an informed response to previous judicial setbacks faced by different forgiveness programs.
However, the decision has not been without controversy. Republican critics argue that such widespread loan cancellation represents an overreach of executive power. Moreover, they claim it offers unfair benefits to those who are college-educated.
Cardona and other administration officials maintain that this relief is crucial to correcting long-standing inequities and dysfunctions within the student loan system, especially for those in public service roles.
As the country prepares for the upcoming election, the Biden administration’s emphasis on student debt relief could significantly shape voter perceptions. With less than three weeks until election day, this policy move might influence sentiments among public service workers and their communities.
The broader implications of this initiative may reverberate beyond the public service sector, affecting public discourse on educational debt and financial equity.
In the coming weeks, it remains to be seen how this decision will impact political dynamics and voter behavior across the nation. As public attention converges on both economic and educational issues, the decision underscores the administration's commitment to addressing the needs of key constituents through substantive action.
Barack Obama is facing backlash over his stern message to black men who are considering a vote for Donald Trump - with some calling Obama's comments condescending as Kamala Harris scrambles to lock down support from the black community.
At his first campaign stop for Harris last week, Obama lectured "the brothers" over their reluctance to support Harris and suggested sexism was to blame.
Obama's comments were a response to mounting fears that Democrats are losing support with men, particularly black and Hispanic men.
A Howard University poll found Harris has support from 84% of black likely voters, but only 59% of black men.
Despite Obama's popularity in the black community, not everyone is convinced that a lecture is what will motivate ambivalent black men to show up for Harris.
Obama's message has been criticized by some as condescending and even racist. Some liberals have complained that Obama is wrongly blaming a demographic that has been loyal to Democrats over the years.
Others suggest that loyalty has not been paid back. Ken Wainwright, a Georgia labor organizer and former Atlanta City Council candidate, said Democrats have taken black voters for granted.
“These are people who should have been easy for Harris,” Wainwright told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “And now Obama is mad. Where you been, homie?”
The Harris campaign showed signs of desperation last week by announcing an agenda targeted to black men.
The "Opportunity Agenda For Black Men" faced immediate backlash, with many accusing Harris of promising handouts based on race. Others said Harris' promises to black men, such as legalizing marijuana, were rooted in toxic assumptions.
“Marijuana? That’s just disrespectful,” Wainwright said. “We’re fathers. We live in these communities. We want to get kids off that stuff.”
The campaign has clarified that Harris' agenda for black men is actually race neutral, as Harris pledges to be a president for "all Americans."
A campaign rep told the Wall Street Journal that while Harris is "clear-eyed about how Black men have long been denied the tools that would allow them to grow their wealth, get a good-paying job and support their loved ones," she is "championing solutions that will benefit all Americans and address these specific barriers to economic opportunity."
Between the scolding and wild oscillations in messaging, Harris is not finishing her campaign on a confident note.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Alan Dershowitz, a longtime leftist and law professor, says he knows how Joe Biden can "save the world" before leaving office.
But he explains he's also confident it is unlikely to happen, and, he explains, "The result of inaction will be a terrorist regime with a nuclear arsenal, followed by a global nuclear arms race."
All because of "the 'Chamberlain' Democrats."
It is in a column posted at the Daily Caller News Foundation that he explains himself, and he cites the threat of a rogue regime in Iran, the world's primary sponsor of terror and the handler for terror proxies such as Hezbollah and Hamas.
"There is only one way to end this threat completely: that is by regime change. The people of Iran have been yearning for regime change since at least 2009. Iran's unpopular ruling mullahs do not represent the more secular, westernized, and even pro-American majority of the country's population," he wrote. "Regime change is always risky because it is impossible to predict what will replace even the most evil regime. The end of Iran's monarchy in 1979, with the abdication of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was seen by many as progress, only to backfire with its replacement by the mullahs and their Islamic Republic. The threat of Iraq under deposed President Saddam Hussein has been largely replaced by a more adventurous Iran. Similar results have occurred following other regime changes."
He said an alternative would be for the U.S. to work with Israel to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear arsenal, using "a military attack against its nuclear facilities."
Dershowitz pointed out that, "The legacy of the last two Democratic presidencies — President Barack Obama's and President Joe Biden's — will be the appeasement of Iran in its efforts to dominate the Middle East and eventually expand its influence through the acquisition of a nuclear arsenal."
He described Obama as the "Chamberlain" for attempting to appease Iran.
"In 1938, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain thought he had a secure peace treaty with Hitler — 'Peace in our time,' he promised the British — only to have Hitler break it at the first opportunity by invading the rump Czechoslovak Republic," he explained.
"Like Chamberlain, Obama, Biden, and Harris seem to believe that 'peace in our time' can be achieved by appeasing Iran and strengthening its economy. The result has been an entirely predictable disaster: by receiving sanctions relief and a humongous increase in oil revenues, Iran has been enabled to expand its proxy war against Israel and the United States through its surrogates in Lebanon, Gaza, Iraq, Yemen, and possibly Sudan," he wrote.
Biden and Harris have only succeeded in making Iran "even stronger and more dangerous."
That had not been developing under President Donald Trump, he pointed out.
"Under the Trump administration, Iran was considerably weakened economically and thus militarily. Now it is on the verge of acquiring a nuclear arsenal, which will allow its proxies to operate under the protection of Iran's nuclear umbrella," he warned.
Those "proxies" could include terror-fomenting organizations like Hamas or Hezbollah.
"Historians will understand that today's Iran is the modern-day version of Nazi Germany and its attempt — for a time successful — to control all of continental Europe. This is not to say that Iran will ever become what Hitler's genocidal Germany became, but it is to express concern about Iran's dangerous regional aspirations, based on religious apocalyptic doctrines," he warned.
So the solution would be regime change or at least strategic military destruction of Iran's nuclear program.
"Although the United States, even as far back as the Obama administration, has pledged to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear arsenal, there is no reason why Iran should believe that, considering U.S. appeasement tactics under Democratic administrations," he said.
He said if Biden can stop Iran "from having a nuclear arsenal would … be a great accomplishment and a lasting positive legacy for the Biden presidency."
The problem? "At the moment, the current administration does not seem to be willing even to allow Israel to go it alone," Dershowitz said.
So the fault for a "terrorist regime with a nuclear arsenal" will rest "squarely with the 'Chamberlain' Democrats."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A stern warning has been issued to illegal migrants who are convicted of felony crimes – they will not be welcome in the U.S. and they will forfeit their privilege to stay.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement issued a statement Tuesday from the New York enforcement removal operations office, after a series of arrests took place in New York City.
Currently, NYC is a sanctuary city which limits its cooperation with ICE officials. As a result, ICE agents are left to go into the city's neighborhoods to find criminal illegal aliens who are ripe for deportation.
According to Fox News, deportation of criminal migrants has come under fire after data showed there are 425,431 convicted criminals currently in removal proceedings who are not in ICE custody. The staggering numbers have compelled the Biden administration to prioritize public safety ahead of the upcoming presidential election which is only in a few short weeks.
Fox News further reported non-detained illegal migrants not in ICE custody have surged from 3.7 million under former President Donald Trump to a bloated 7.4 million under the Biden administration.
On Wednesday, ICE said officers arrested an unlawfully present Venezuelan national, Darwin Andres Gomez-Izquiel, after he was convicted of assaulting law enforcement officers in Times Square. ICE agents took Gomez-Izquiel into custody upon his conviction in the New York Supreme Court.
ERO New York City Field Office Director Kenneth Genalo said in a statement that ICE will not allow communities to become safe havens for illegal migrants who do not abide by the law.
"Gomez-Izquiel is a criminal and threat to the public servants, residents and businesses of New York City … We will not allow our communities to become safe havens for noncitizens who refuse to abide our laws. ERO New York City will continue to work with unending determination to apprehend and remove these violent criminal offenders," Genalo said.
During an audio town hall with the Breakfast Club host Charlamagne Tha God, Vice President Kamala Harris blamed the border crisis on Trump, again making the false claim the Biden administration had tried to pass an immigration bill to "fix" the problem at the southern border.
"Charlamagne, the first thing we dropped was a bill to fix the broken immigration system, which by the way, Trump did not fix when he was president … You can look at every step along the way. We then tightened up the asylum process. We then worked with what we needed to cure ports of entry. We did a number of things, including what we did to get that border security bill passed, and then also an executive order that has actually reduced significantly the number of illegal crossings," Harris said.
However, former National Border Patrol Council President Brandon Judd told Fox News host Steve Doocy the bill Harris purports to have been nixed by Trump did not actually contain anything within it to secure the border. Rather, it would have given a pathway to citizenship to over 11 million illegal migrants residing in the U.S.
"There were no border security measures in that bill. Again … it was all about amnesty for those people that are currently here … When you look at that, that's the reason the Border Patrol agents right now just don't feel like their job means anything. That's why people are looking at leaving if she gets elected again. We all want to be able to feel like our job means something that we're able to accomplish," Judd said.
Judd added there are no mechanisms that border patrol agents are able to use right now, and noted that is directly the fault of Harris.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Kamala Harris' rhetoric repeatedly has gone well into la-la land as she battles President Donald Trump in this most important presidential election in just weeks.
And it's with a purpose, charges commentator John Daniel Davidson at The Federalist.
To "prime Democrat voters for violent resistance should Trump win in November."
During her Fox News interview just hours ago, he explained, "She became visibly upset after Baier (Baier) played a clip of former President Donald Trump calling out the weaponization of government and the endless investigations and lawfare he's been subjected to. The vice president, her voice rising in outrage, jabbed her finger at Baier and said, 'You and I both know that he has talked about turning the American military on the American people. He has talked about going after people who are engaged in peaceful protest. He has talked about locking people up because they disagree with him.'"
Also, Davidson explained, "At a campaign rally in Pennsylvania this week she told the crowd that former President Donald Trump considers anyone who doesn't support him to be an enemy of the United States. 'He is saying he would use the military to go after them.'"
Just days ago, "Harris claimed without a hint of irony that if Trump is elected he'll use the Department of Justice 'as a weapon against his political enemies,' adding, 'You know who does that? Dictators do that.' At one point during the show, she agreed with a caller who said Trump will lock 'anyone who doesn't look white into camps,' replying, 'You've hit on a really important point and expressed it I think so well."
Davidson noted, "Even before Harris seized the Democratic nomination from President Joe Biden, the idea that Trump is an existential threat to American democracy was the refrain of the Biden campaign. Harris has taken that theme and run with it."
"The purpose of it isn't just to scare voters into casting their ballot against the former president, or to provoke some unstable would-be assassin into taking a shot at Trump (although some Democrats no doubt see that as a happy by-product of this Trump-as-dictator rhetoric). Its main purpose is to prime Democrat voters for violent resistance should Trump win in November," he charged.
He suggested a comparison of "the lopsidedness of the rhetoric between the Trump and Harris campaigns."
"Trump often makes sweeping (and mostly true) statements about the deep state, about the border and illegal immigration, about crime, about how Harris and the Democrats are destroying the country. But when he uses the phrase 'destroying the country,' he's talking about things like crime, homelessness, drug addiction, rampant inflation and the cost of groceries. These things, he says, are the result of policies Democrats have put in place. If you're looking for someone to blame, he says, blame Biden and Harris, because all these problems are their fault."
Harris, and her Democrats, are "pushing a narrative that Trump is going to be a fascist dictator if he wins office and use the powers of the presidency to go after ordinary Americans. That's an extreme and frankly unhinged position with no basis in reality. You don't say things like that unless you're hoping to provoke a strong reaction, and the reaction Democrats are hoping to provoke is violent resistance to a second Trump term."
He warned the rhetoric goes further: "After all, if you really thought that Trump would order the military and the Justice Department to round up you and your family, wouldn't you do anything to stop him? Wouldn't you take to the streets to save your country and thwart the rise of a fascist dictatorship? At least two would-be assassins have taken the Democrats' anti-Trump rhetoric seriously. Harris is hoping that many more people will between now and Election Day, and respond by rejecting a second Trump term — in the streets, if they must."
He pointed out the Democrats already have used that strategy: in 2020.
"During the BLM riots in the summer of 2020, Harris herself was out in front egging on the rioters, infamously working to raise bail money for those who had been arrested. Of the protests themselves, she said this in a June 2020 interview with Stephen Colbert: 'Everyone beware. They're not gonna stop before Election Day in November, and they're not gonna stop after Election Day … They're not gonna let up, and they should not.'"
They used the unrest coming from BLM and Antifa riots, which did billions of dollars in damage to American cities, to "damage Trump's reelection campaign."
If, in fact, Harris is a "left-wing radical," she would have little concern "if a couple neighborhoods here there get burned to the ground, " or "young women get raped and killed by illegal immigrants," or apartment complexes "get taken over by criminal alien gangs," because it's in "service of a greater goal."
He warned, "What Harris and the Democrats are doing with this line about Trump rounding up Americans and putting them in camps is preparing the ground for massive civic unrest in the event of a Trump victory. The purpose of the unrest would be to cripple Trump's administration before he even takes office, and to disrupt normal life for so many Americans that they will rue the day they ever voted for Trump. … It's exactly what Harris is planning for and hoping to provoke if Trump wins."
The more recent rhetoric has followed a campaign, pursued for years by Democrats and media organizations, that Trump actually is a "Hitler," suggesting that anything goes if the goal is to stop Trump.