This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
When COVID-19 came out of its Chinese home, probably a lab where technicians were working to make bat viruses more transmissible and more deadly, it quickly started killing people.
Shots, although more a treatment than an actual vaccine, were developed and approved for emergency use because they still were considered experimental.
Millions of people took the shots, many voluntarily. But millions more were ordered to take them, and one of those populations now may be in line for relief from the sometimes lethal side effects of those injections.
It is the Washington Examiner that has reported on a proposal by U.S. Rep. Matt Rosendale, R-Mont., for the University Forced Vaccination Student Injury Mitigation Act.
It would order colleges and universities that ordered their students to take part in the medical experiment to pay for injuries caused by the shots.
It would require the compensation under penalty of those schools losing federal funds from the Education Department.
"If you are not prepared to face the consequences, you should have never committed the act," Rosendale announced in a statement about his plan.
"Colleges and universities forced students to inject themselves with an experimental vaccine knowing it was not going to prevent COVID-19 while potentially simultaneously causing life-threatening health defects like Guillian-Barre Syndrome and myocarditis. It is now time for schools to be held accountable for their brazen disregard for students' health and pay for the issues they are responsible for causing."
It is the Washington Examiner that has reported on a proposal by U.S. Rep. Matt Rosendale, R-Mont., for the University Forced Vaccination Student Injury Mitigation Act.
It would order colleges and universities that ordered their students to take part in the medical experiment to pay for injuries caused by the shots.
It would require the compensation under penalty of those schools losing federal funds from the Education Department.
"If you are not prepared to face the consequences, you should have never committed the act," Rosendale announced in a statement about his plan.
"Colleges and universities forced students to inject themselves with an experimental vaccine knowing it was not going to prevent COVID-19 while potentially simultaneously causing life-threatening health defects like Guillian-Barre Syndrome and myocarditis. It is now time for schools to be held accountable for their brazen disregard for students' health and pay for the issues they are responsible for causing."
The plan would allow students to seek reimbursement for costs by providing a request, documentation of the shot, its link to a health issue, and an accounting of medical expenses.
The Examiner noted that conditions including myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, Guillian-Barre Syndrome, and other diseases that the secretary of education determines are associated with a COVID-19 vaccine would be covered.
The report pointed out that at least 17 colleges or universities even today are demanding students accept the COVID-19 shots for them to be enrolled.
"Countless college students have been injured by COVID-19 vaccinations," charged Lucia Sinatra, of No College Mandates, which organizes opposition to the requirement that students be part of medical experiments.
One of the well-known fact-checking organizations online, though leftist in its leanings, even conceded that a study of "around 99 million people" revealed multiple potential side effects from the shots.
"A study published Feb. 12 in the journal Vaccine reported on an international group of more than 99 million people who received COVID-19 vaccines, primarily finding links to known rare side effects. The study largely focused on the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, which have been widely given in the U.S., as well as the AstraZeneca vaccine, which was never authorized in the U.S.," the report said.
Among the problems? "Myocarditis and pericarditis, conditions involving inflammation of the heart muscle and lining."
The scientists and physicians who promoted the shots still say that they believe the benefits of the shots outweigh the risks involved in taking them.
Also linked to the shots has been acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, or ADEM, an autoimmune condition that causes inflammation of the brain and spinal cord, that report said.
The plan so far has attracted nominal support in the House, and even it if passes there, it likely would face opposition from Democrats in the Senate. However, the November election is only days away and such plans often are reintroduced in a subsequent Congress to take up, possibly with a different political alignment.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
WASHINGTON – Billionaire Patrick Byrne, founder and former CEO of e-tailing giant Overstock.com, has been relentless – risking his life to expose the "shadow government's" ongoing "soft-coup" against America and the Deep State's elaborate and ongoing scheme to frame, incarcerate and eliminate GOP presidential nominee former President Donald Trump.
In his explosive memoir published earlier this year, titled "Danger Close: Domestic Extremist #1 Comes Clean," Byrne reveals how he, the son of former GEICO chairman John J. Byrne, went from being one of the wealthiest men on the planet as Overstock's CEO to being deemed by the Department of Homeland Security to be "Domestic Extremist #1."
The whistleblower played an integral role in the "Russian collusion hoax," a seditious scheme devised by a politically weaponized FBI to frame a sitting president, Donald Trump. The fictitious "Russia, Russia, Russia" scandal would go on to plague the Trump presidency with the wrongful indictment and incarceration of numerous members of his administration.
The federal government has given Byrne numerous ultimatums, warning him that speaking out about the seditious operation he was tasked to execute by the FBI would become a death sentence.
On top of that, Byrne is reportedly in hiding as he faces off in a legal battle with Dominion Voting Systems and a defamation suit filed by Hunter Biden. Byrne insists he has irrefutable proof of widespread voter fraud implemented to rig the 2020 election, some of which he presented in the Oval Office to Trump. His allegations prompted Dominion to slap him with a $1.7 billion lawsuit.
In September, the Venezuelan government put a $25 million bounty on Byrne, who subsequently "fled to Dubai," reports Newsweek.
'The Russia probe – I set it up'
Last summer, Byrne called this reporter, who had previously interviewed him, with an astounding admission. The wind blared through the phone's speaker as if he were traveling at high speed in a car, or about to take flight in a helicopter.
"I worked with the Democrats on the Russia probe – I set it up," he said, before abruptly hanging up the phone. Hours later, Byrne, the mysterious billionaire and mentee of Warren Buffett, sent this reporter a link to an exposé published by Capitol Times Magazine's "Deep Capture" report. His hidden role with the government over the past decade must be widely reported to the masses to stop the steal and save America, he said.
"General Flynn says that the following story is the hypersonic missile," Byrne wrote in a September 2023 text message to this reporter, accompanying a link to the 99-page report. "[Flynn] says the single most important thing for the country is getting this story digested… This is all true."
Byrne summarizes his years-long involvements with the FBI, top law enforcement officials and Senate Judiciary dating back to 2005 in an extensive Q&A featured in the magazine, providing the most comprehensive insight in print of the James Bond-esque clandestine web in which he has been entangled.
Since the release of the Capitol Times Magazine report, the former Overstock CEO, once hailed as the "Messiah of Bitcoin," has spoon-fed the public parts of his story, incrementally, through a series of interviews with various journalists as he reveals what he knows about the FBI's attempt to seize control of the U.S. electoral system.
Excerpts of a video compilation of Byrne's interviews, in which he discusses the ins and outs of "Operation Snow Globe" – a one-time Deep State plan to control Hillary Clinton had she become U.S. president – is an expedient medium through which the public can "digest" Byrne's perilous crusade with the FBI, spanning more than a decade.
The hour-long video is now viral, but only on SpaceX founder Elon Musk's X platform, since Big Tech continues to employ outright censorship on speech damaging to the permanent government.
'Operation Snow Globe'
Like many Americans, Byrne grew up revering the FBI as the nation's premiere law enforcement agency, traditionally one of the federal government's most highly regarded institutions – at least, before it became increasingly clear that the Bureau had been "captured" at its highest levels by so-called leaders with a subversive and unconstitutional intent.
In 2005, Byrne began his first encounter with the FBI when he blew the whistle on Wall Street and the "mass crack in the financial system."
"Hedge funds were looting hundreds of billions and probably trillions out of the system," he told Capitol Times Magazine's "Deep Capture" feature.
After his highly effective exposure of fraud on Wall Street, which had led to the 2008 banking crisis, the feds pursued Byrne to undertake another mission, and then another.
Willing to serve, the next assignment federal agents would present to Byrne was risky, but a relatively simple task that would turn his life upside down and, ironically, incite the Department of Homeland Security to designate him "domestic extremist #1."
In December 2015, Byrne was assigned by FBI agents in New York to initiate "Operation Snow Globe." The mission consisted of facilitating a sting of former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton via entrapping her in a series of bribes.
Byrne was told he was to bribe Clinton with millions of dollars to keep the scandal-plagued former secretary of state on a "Bunsen burner."
"They don't want any attention brought to me," Byrne states in the video that has been viewed 7.5 million times on X. "I bribed Hillary Clinton $18 million dollars."
"I caused Hillary Clinton to be offered to take a bribe in mid-July of 2016 by the FBI. The FBI had me bribe – had me facilitate a bribe for Hillary Clinton, which I accomplished," he explains.
"They also told me she had already taken one bribe for $20 million – and I got an $18 million bribe in her face and she took it. I've been shown the why – the bank records that show that she took it.
"So, they don't want me – any attention being brought to me. That is probably why they omitted my name when they leaked the story."
Byrne contends that when the FBI tasked him with bribing Clinton in late 2015, federal agents informed him that the Democratic presidential contender had already been compromised by accepting a bribe for millions of dollars from Turkey in a bid to entrap the former U.S. senator.
The Overstock CEO was to carry out the next step and facilitate the bribe with a "bagman" from Azerbaijan.
"I know what's in the Durham report," Byrne insists. "I facilitated a bribe for Hillary Clinton on Jan. 14, 2016, right here in this town on behalf of the FBI.
"They came to me on Dec. 1st, 2015, and they told me that Hillary Clinton had accepted a bribe from Turkey for $21 million. They told me that I would be working for a group in New York [with] FBI agents who had authorization to set Hillary Clinton up in a sting.
"The bagman from that other government was, I was to befriend and I was to get that person 10 minutes alone in a room with Hillary Clinton.
"I did," said Byrne.
"On January 16, Hillary Clinton was in this town and she met in a way that was kept off her schedule and she accepted an $18 million bribe. General Barr knows this – Durham – they know. This is what's behind it all."
'Scrubbed from the highest level'
Days after Clinton accepted the bribe from Byrne and met with the bagman, the FBI gave Byrne an ultimatum, recalls Byrne. There had evidently been a change of plans.
The "highest of levels" terminated the scheme to entrap Clinton with bribes, a ploy that could crush her electoral prospects. Instead, Clinton was to be installed as commander-in-chief, as long as she would abide by certain conditions.
"They came to me three days later and told me I 'had to forget about it' and 'forget that ever happened,'" Byrne admonished. "\I said, 'What are you talking about?'
"They gave me one excuse. They said – 'Hillary is going to win – they decided upstairs and there's nothing – nothing is going to be able to stop that now. She's going to win and she's going to send her people up to the FBI and they will ask who is part of investigating Hillary, and any of us who are part of it are going to be destroyed and that includes you too, Patrick.' And so, this mission has been scrubbed from the highest level.
"I thought about that, and I said, 'Yes, sir.'"
But the FBI was not done with Byrne – not yet. Hillary was scandal-plagued: In addition to the bribes Byrne has blown the whistle on, it was Clinton, not Trump, who had actually "colluded with the Russians," as Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton explained in a video interview with WND.
"Two or three weeks later, I was back with three federal agents [in Salt Lake City, Utah]," Byrne said, noting, "I let them know, 'This was not sitting well with me and I'd like to know why they had changed course.'
"We had almost a year before the election," he continued. "They could have me and another person in front of a grand jury in a week and gotten her indicted."
Bottom line: Clinton was going to be placed in the executive office only if she agreed to act as an arm of the shadow government, Byrne explained.
"They told me word for word, 'Patrick, what's really going on is this: President Obama has his people across the federal bureaucracy at this point, but especially the Department of Justice," said Byrne.
"Hillary Clinton is going to be president for eight years, and nothing's going to change that, but think of there being a 'Bunsen burner' within the Department of Justice,'" Byrne says the federal agents told him, verbatim. "That evidence about the two bribes you were part of gathering is going to be sitting on the Bunsen burner, and the hand on the Bunsen burner is going to be one of Barack Obama's people.
"If Hillary is a good girl and defends Obamacare, that flame stays low. If she's a bad girl and thinks for herself, it's going to get turned up high that way. Barack Obama's going to manage Hillary Clinton for the eight years she's president, then she's going to step down, and Michelle's going to run, and, Patrick, that's the plan.
"I was later to learn that this plan was called 'Operation Snow Globe.' Snow Globe we had, you know, Christmas kids get a little glass ball like a shake. And this was a snow globe they wanted Hillary Clinton, and a snow globe that Clinton, that Obama and Brennan and Comey could shake up anytime they wanted while she's president. My bribe was the lure, it was the bait to lure her to step into that snow globe."
The government continues to attempt to squeeze Byrne into compliance as he blows the whistle on foreign election interference.
In a video interview conducted in July 2022, Byrne revealed to this reporter that that he, Gen. Flynn and attorney Sidney Powell met with Trump in December 2020 for an emergency meeting. In the Oval office, Byrne presented the president with advisories issued by the Department of Justice and DHS, showcasing how U.S. electoral system had been hacked by Iran, which allowed Trump to invoke emergency powers.
In September 2023, five convicted Proud Boys leaders, four of whom were found guilty of seditious conspiracy, were sentenced to 22, 18, 17, 15 and 10 years in prison for their alleged roles in the U.S. Capitol demonstration on Jan. 6, 2021.
Byrne donated over $200,000 to Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio's legal fund and continues to assist with legal fees of January 6 defendants. In fact, Byrne has offered to pay the $350,000 of damages the Capitol building sustained. Along with whatever other charges J6 defendants typically face, assessments for the damages to the building left behind after the riot are often added.
In addition, as "Deep Capture" reports, "Byrne has publicly offered to face all non-violent charges from that day: those accused can say they did it because they listened to Byrne, and Byrne will agree to stipulate to this, on the condition he can defend himself in televised proceedings."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
President Donald Trump often has blown to smithereens the Deep State protocols in Washington. He did it during his first campaign, his first term in office, and now that there's a potential for his second, he's again following his own path.
This time it's private funding for the launch of a transition team.
There will be a transition from the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris regime, whether Trump wins, or Kamala Harris wins the election and pushes America further into leftist ideologies like transgenderism, abortion, and "diversity" agendas that insist on giving people jobs and money because of their skin color or sex orientation.
"I've talked to Donald Trump specifically about this, and I said, 'Look, the last time you were in there, you put John Bolton in charge of NSA, and Mike Pompeo in charge of the CIA…' and he said, 'Here's the difference… when I got in last time, I had no idea how to govern, and I got surrounded by donors and corporate people who said you appoint this guy and appoint that guy… I appointed a lot of bad people.'"
Kennedy continued, "I was listening this morning to this extraordinary interview that Donald Trump did with Joe Rogan yesterday… and he said, 'This time I'm not gonna do that.' He told us that (too), and he didn't just promise that, but he did something no other president's done before. Normally, the transition team is not created until November 6th because GAO, the General Accounting Office, pays for all the cost of the transition team. Trump said, 'I'm not gonna do it this time. I'm not gonna do it their way. I'm gonna start my own transition team three months early.' And he got private donors to fund it, and he's appointed 20 people including me and Tulsi, and there's people of all different kinds of ideology and people who we're gonna have to go up against on that transition team and fight for our vision.
"But I can tell you this, which is unique: there are no corporate lobbyists on that transition team. And, usually, it's 100% corporate lobbyists. So it's very, very different, and it gives me lots of hope that this government is gonna be different than any government we've ever seen."
Politico reported Congress has tried to address transition issues, as during the 2020 events, Trump still was challenging what many believe to have been corrupt influences that altered the winner in that race when the transition to Biden-Harris could have been developing.
And while Congress may have tried to resolve one issue, the report said, "The new law may grant Trump access to the federal resources and state secrets needed to start building a government without having to adhere to rules on fundraising, conflicts of interests and transparency — even if he loses."
The problem for leftists is that unless Trump signs up for the various "coordination" agreements, his transition would not be bound by the rules that the government imposes, the report said.
The Trump team has confirmed that it is working to engage with the outgoing administration on transition plans.
The change primarily allows both candidates to pursue a transition process even while a disputed election is resolved.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The horrific situation happened a few years ago, but the tale about a man who was being prepped for organ donation while alive has gotten much attention lately because of an investigation into the situation.
And it's caused many people to drop out of the organ donation plans to which they had subscribed.
It was legacy wire service reports at the AP that warned of a "spike" in people revoking organ donor plans.
It's because, the report said, their confidence was "shaken by reports that organs were nearly retrieved from a Kentucky man mistakenly declared dead."
The report noted that it happened in 2021 and the man remains alive today. It was exposed during a recent congressional hearing on the topic.
"The federal agency that regulates the U.S. transplant system is investigating, and the Kentucky attorney general's office said it is 'reviewing the facts to identify an appropriate response,'" the report said.
It is at PJMedia where there is an explanation of why people are running scared from the idea.
That report identified the man as Anthony Hoover, 33, who "woke up in a Kentucky hospital with medical personnel shaving his chest, bathing his body, and talking about harvesting his organs."
He had been hospitalized with an overdose and doctors apparently claimed he was unresponsive, "lacked reflexes" "had "emptiness in his eyes" and was "brain dead."
He was two hours into a five-hour procedure to remove organs when a staff member came out to talk to the family with what has to be the stunner of the year: "He's not ready. He woke up."
The report noted that those who formerly worked at the "organ procurement organization" said someone who was making eye contact and shaking his head "no" never should have been near the operating room.
But Dorrie Dils, president of thte Association of Organ Procurement Organizations, pointed out that the process is based on the trust of the public. And once lost, it can take "years" to restore, she said.
The case came to the public's attention through an investigation in Congress, and the result has been "thousands" of people leaving the programs.
Donate Life America, for example, has had 170 people per day leaving the registry.
The report noted that while doing a heart catheterization, the patient had "purposeful movement to pain" and he was "thrashing around."
A cardiologist suggested, "I would most certainly call this purposeful movement, and they should not have said that patient was not going to have a meaningful recovery with these reflexes."
In fact, the report said, he was given a paralytic and sedated further.
What appears to be at issue is how doctors make a determination that a patient is dead.
Daniel Sulmasy, of Georgetown Hospital, said the key is that they do "the right tests and doing them well."
The case has had long shadows. In France, the government presumes donation consent, but recently up to 1,000 people per day have joined a registry of those objecting.
The trend could have "catastrophic consequences" for those needing transplants, said Regis Bronchard, of the French Biomedicine Agency.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Tucker Carlson is is going nuclear on a New York Times reporter who sought comment about alleged election misinformation by the conservative champion, telling him to "f*** off."
Carlson shared a text exchange late Monday night from Nico Grant, a San Francisco-based technology correspondent for the newspaper, who indicated: "We rely on an analysis conducted by researchers at Media Matters for America," a left-wing-minded media watchdog.
Grant said he was working on article where researchers found 286 videos Carlson posted on YouTube between May and August supposedly containing misinformation, including a clip of Carlson mentioning a "clearly stolen" election.
Grant also sought to know if Carlson were a member of the YouTube Partner Program, and if so, "How often does YouTube demonetize your videos?"
Carlson responded: "So the New York Times is working with a left wing hate group to silence critics of the Democratic Party? Please ask yourself why you're participating in it. This is why you got into journalism? It's shameful. I hope you're filled with guilt and self-loathing for sending me a text like this. Please quote me."
The reply from the reporter stated: "Thank you for your prompt response. Would you like to address any of the points or questions above?"
Carlson then responded: "Would I like to participate in your attempt to censor me? No thanks. But I do hope you'll quote what I wrote above and also note that I told you to f*** off, which I am now doing. Thanks."
On his New York Times author page, Grant says of himself: "As a Times journalist, I share the values and adhere to the standards of integrity outlined in our Ethical Journalism Handbook. I want all of my work to be accurate and fair. I do not accept gifts, money or favors from anyone who might figure into my reporting. I do not directly own or trade stocks. I make every effort to understand issues from multiple angles."
Meanwhile, the Fox News Channel aired a segment Tuesday afternoon on what might be the same New York Times article in the works.
The network interviewed Joe Concha, a Fox News contributor, who said:
"There is not a more corrupt, more radical media organization out there than Media Matters. And the New York Times, which has vast resources and personnel, instead of doing its own research has now outsourced this to this patently dishonest, activist organization whose number one mission, outside of taking out this network, is to squash any and all free speech through astroturf campaigns, online against anyone or anything they consider to be conservative or even right of center. Elon Musk once referred to Media Matters as evil propaganda machine. That is not hyperbole, he ain't wrong."
"So this is the game plan here," Concha continued. "Media Matters along with the New York Times, and it's getting increasingly difficult to differentiate the two, by the way, they're gonna pressure YouTube to demonetize these big voices on the right like Ben Shapiro, like Benny Johnson.
"Remember that YouTube is owned by Google, and Google is the the number one donor to Democratic Party out of Silicon Valley. If it does happen, the argument will be Shapiro or Johnson, they are spreading misinformation on the platform, misinformation like saying COVID may have come from a lab or Hunter Biden's laptop is Russian disinformation. You know that kind of misinformation. So, who's to decide what it is and what it isn't? But that's what they're trying to do right now seven days before an election."
Concha concluded: "Media Matters is a tax-free organization, but they receive millions from Democratic megadonors. And they use those funds to pressure major companies to pull their advertising from outlets that they target. And yet, here's the New York Times presenting them as some sort of objective, legitimate source, when they're nothing more than a far-left activist organization.
"So, hopefully they're not successful here, but the deck is stacked against Shapiro and Johnson and others at this point, given that it's the New York Times with Media Matters and YouTube and Google all trying to take them out, and as we saw with Hunter Biden's laptop, they were successful before the last election in terms of squashing voices at a critical time."
Andre Soriano, the dress designer who created the infamous "Make America Great Again" worn at the 2017 Grammy Awards, has been forced to take down signs supporting former President Donald Trump, Fox News reported. The city of Occoquan, Virginia, cited Soriano for the signs after "Karens" made trouble and complained.
Philippines immigrant Soriano said he was trying to express his First Amendment rights by hanging signs in favor of Trump at the building where he has both his business and residence. Unfortunately, local women made it impossible for him.
One woman complained to the police, who issued a notice to take down the signs. The dress designer said, "I actually started a flag war here in Occoquan, Virginia."
Soriano would display his signs and the infamous dress in front of the store but found that they attracted hostility. "The reason I put my Trump dress outside is, so I don't have to encounter [this]," the designer shared.
Prior to creating the infamous gown, Soriano dressed the likes of Courtney Love, Miley Cyrus, Pharrell Williams, and Rhianna. Once singer and songwriter Joy Villa donned the pro-Trump gown at the music awards show, his career suffered.
The navy blue trumpet gown was patterned after a Trump campaign banner and features the then-president's slogan bedazzled in white sparkles. The crisscross back leads to the body of the dress down to a train featuring Trump's name.
Singer Joy Villa Wears MAGA dress to the Grammy Awards ceremony!
Troll level 5000 ! Snowflakes will be triggered ! 😂#ERedCarpet pic.twitter.com/BJi2f9rPZ3
— Unfiltered☢Boss (@Unfilteredboss1) February 12, 2017
The red carpet exposure that most designers clamor for to raise their profiles led to a very different result for Soriano. "That's when our lives changed. We had death threats," the designer shared.
"There are a lot of celebrities in Hollywood that are very divisive, and they didn't really like President Trump," Soriano added. Still, Soriano was determined to have his say.
Soriano's dress and signs caused one woman so much distress that she confronted him outside the store. A friend and political activist Audra Johnson came to film the dust-up after Soriano asked for her help. "I have a video of her hiding in a bush. I don’t know what she was doing," Johnson explained.
Soriano can be heard on one of the videos saying, "This wokeism is real. The ‘Karens’ are real. They're crying for nothing. Because of a sign. Come on." The term "Karen" is an insult applied to entitled white women, and it seemed to fit this time.
The confrontation with this woman resulted in her being coddled by police officers and later supported by the city in her bid to limit Soriano's free speech. The dressmaker received two citations despite America being the "land of the free, not the land of what people think."
Soriano added, "I'm an American designer. I am free to express and create whatever I want." Besides this incident, Soriano said he is subject to other types of harassment, including women throwing stink bombs in the store and hurling insults.
Trump's name triggers leftists, who call for all sorts of limits on free speech so they don't have to see something they don't agree with. Soriano is correct that this is antithetical to American ideals, and Trump is the only politician who is furiously working to restore these norms.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
President Donald Trump has a new ad in his campaign for the White House in next week's election … and there are some people who start watching and don't get to the end.
"I couldn't finish it," explained one social media commenter. "I have a daughter and if this ever happened…. Probably best not to say."
Eric Daugherty of Florida Voice News posted the story online, and it is about the sorrow of a mother whose daughter was attacked and murdered by illegal aliens – while Kamala Harris was the Joe Biden administration "Border Czar." She tells her "heartbreaking" story.
"Her daughter was reportedly sexually assaulted for 2 straight hours, and killed, by illegal aliens," he reported, noting the mother explained, "I woke up to notice [my daughter] wasn't in her bed […] She was strangled to death. Left with no pants … ."
The mother charged, 'Kamala Harris was in charge of immigration and our borders. If we had better border policies… I truly believe this all could have been prevented. … Under her – my daughter's life was ripped away from her. She had her entire life ahead of her."
In fact, Biden and Harris trashed literally all of President Donald Trump's border security plans on the first day they took office. The result has been millions of illegal aliens flooding into the United States, including large numbers of potential terrorists, known criminals and violent offenders.
Trump has promised, if elected, to once again work to secure the border.
Another commenter responded with a praying hands emoji, and another gave a first-person testimony, "My family all had to flee Venezuela to escape the crime ridden hell hole it had become. This criminals is what we call 'The Children of Chavez' which have killed millions back home, we ran away to be safe in America and Kamala let them in, you guys have no idea what they're capable of. They kill with no remorse, be careful because if you don't get this animals out it will only get worse."
Many expressed their condolences for the heartbreaking tale.
"I couldn't finish watching the ad. It makes me physically ill," said Sue. Michael joined, with, "I am angry. This poor child's death is on Kamala Harris' hands."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Perhaps the 2024 presidential race should be the sermon topic for Christian pastors all across the country in these last few days before the vote.
It's because one of the candidates has exhibited a personality that is "militantly hostile toward Americans of faith."
Those are the words of President Donald Trump about Kamala Harris, who, he says, has been "very destructive to Christianity and very destructive to evangelicals and to the Catholic Church."
"She is your worst nightmare," he said recently. "Much worse, much worse than Biden, and he wasn't so hot."
A new report from the Washington Stand explains how there is evidence for Trump's opinion of Harris.
It cites her record of abortion and the LGBT ideology, especially the transgenderism agenda that includes doping children with chemicals and then doing surgical mutilations on their bodies.
Further, it comes from "repeated prosecution — both in the White House and prior to becoming vice president — of pro-life Americans and her complicity in targeting American Catholics with the FBI," the report explained.
Trump has pledged to "stop the Biden-Harris administration's weaponization of law enforcement against Americans of faith" and has said that "no longer will the DOJ and the FBI be allowed to target, persecute, or round up Christians or pro-life activists and throw them in jail for living out their religious beliefs," it explained.
But Harris goes further, it said.
"Harris is promising more than just unrestricted abortion on demand: she's promising to make American Christians carry out and pay for abortions," the report charged. "In an NBC News interview on Tuesday, Harris was asked if she would consider 'making concessions' on abortion if she were to win the White House in order to garner support from pro-abortion Republicans like Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine)."
Her response was that no concessions were appropriate to protect religious rights when it comes to abortion.
NBC's Hallie Jackson asked specifically about those accommodations, and Harris was adamant: "I don't think we should be making concessions when we're talking about a fundamental freedom to make decisions about your own body."
The report noted Harris was unwilling even to consider using religious exemptions as an "olive branch" to the senators.
Harris insisted that a woman's "freedom to make decisions about their own body, and that cannot be negotiable."
Mary Szoch of the Family Research Council's Center for Human Dignity confirmed immediately that Harris isn't pro-choice, she is "pro-abortion. She wants to force everyone to perform abortions — even physicians who recognize that the killing of an innocent unborn child is murder and a grave sin — and she wants to force American taxpayers to pay for abortions."
She warned, "No Christian can vote for her in good conscience."
"This means that all Christian hospitals, healthcare providers, businesses, etc., would be forced to provide/cover abortion if she got her way. It would be the end of the First Amendment and religious liberty as we know it," said the Center for Baptist Leadership.
That organizations executive director, William Wolfe, explained, "In the final moments of her floundering campaign, Kamala Harris has decided to drop the mask and reveal her deep-seated hatred for the unborn and all American Christians. There are so many things wrong with her recent comments, both morally and legally, that it's hard to know where to begin."
He noted she's wrong on the Constitution, which contains "no 'fundamental freedom' to murder the unborn" and she also would destroy the First Amendment.
Her agenda, he said, is "nothing short of a satanic tyranny that flies in the face of everything America was founded on."
CatholicVote questioned, "Why would any Christian vote for her?" with her agenda to "deny religious exemptions for abortions – forcing Christians to kill unborn children."
And Ben Domenech, of The Spectator, noted, "Forcing Catholic hospitals, which supply care to some of the most vulnerable populations, to perform abortions or shut their doors is literally the most vile thing a major party candidate has ever endorsed."
It was Carlo Vigano, formerly archbishop in the Catholic Church, who warned voters that Harris reports to Satan, in a stunning condemnation of a presidential candidate.
A commentary at the Washington Examiner pointed out that voters of faith should be alarmed.
"Harris is no friend to religious people, and she actively stood on the side of religious oppression while in Congress and during the last four years as vice president."
The Examiner piece described Harris' abortion agenda as "extremism."
It explains, "The Democratic nominee for president believes in forcing religious healthcare providers to perform abortions, a procedure that goes against many of their deeply held religious beliefs. It's further proof a Harris administration would be authoritarian and infringe on religious rights while masquerading as freedom-loving and tolerant."
She previously sought to injure Christians and their community across the nation with her Do No Harm Act, the report said. At that time, she confirmed, "Tht First Amendment guarantee [of religious freedom] should never be used to undermine other Americans' civil rights or subject them to discrimination on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation or gender identity."
In just the past few days Harris has suggested that people need to help God by voting for her, and that those who believe "Jesus is Lord" have no place at her rallies.
Abortion doctors who appeared on stage at Democrat presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris's rally on Sunday seemed confused and failed to help a woman with an actual medical problem.
The rally, which attracted thousands of people primarily by advertising a free concert by Beyonce and then angered them when she didn't actually perform, featured several abortion doctors speaking in support of abortion rights.
Dr. Richard Todd Ivy finally noticed the woman's medical need and said, "I think someone needs some medical assistance over here," pointing to the rallygoer.
After a little while, someone did go over to the woman and provide medical attention, after which Ivy confirmed, "They're okay."
The rally then continued with its pro-abortion spiel.
Democrats have latched onto abortion as their central issue, capitalizing on public opinion that Republicans might be taking restrictions and bans a little too far.
As usual, however, Democrats are the ones taking things too far by demanding rights for women to have abortions on demand.
Sure, some women are pro-choice and believe not all abortions should be banned, but there are two problems with the Democrat strategy.
First, most people including women don't see abortion as a primary election issue. Even if they do care about it, they care more about the economy, jobs, inflation, and the current unchecked illegal immigration than they do about abortion.
Second, the majority of voters are not in support of unrestricted late-term abortions. Many favor a ban after 15 weeks or 20 weeks, a time when with medical intervention, many unborn babies can survive outside the womb.
At the rally, abortion doctors came across as uncaring when they didn't go and help the rallygoer.
Where is their compassion? Did the many abortions they have performed strip it from them?
Harris actually got booed at the rally because people thought Beyonce was going to perform, but instead she showed up "as a mom" and praised Harris.
The bait-and-switch was said to be the only way Harris could fill seats.
The Justice Department under President Joe Biden and his wanna-be successor Democrat presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris has "absolutely" been going after their political opponents, Republican vice presidential nominee Sen. J.D. Vance (OH) told NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday.
Host Kristin Welker pointed out that two of Trump's former high-ranking staffers in the U.S. military came out and called him fascist last week, which she apparently considered incriminating.
“Let me ask you about what we heard this week," she said. "Donald Trump’s chief of staff former General John Kelly, said he is a fascist. Mark Milley also called him a fascist. When two four-star generals who worked so closely with Donald Trump called him a fascist why shouldn’t voters believe them, senator?”
But Vance had a response ready for her that explained perfectly well why they might have done so.
Vance said, “I think Mark Milley and John Kelly are disgruntled employees. The very things they accused Donald Trump of people who were in the room at the time some of those comments have made have said explicitly Donald Trump did not say the things he was accused of."
Trump has been the victim of numerous allegations that were later refuted by others who witnessed what actually happened.
Most recently, he was accused by The Atlantic of complaining about paying for a military funeral of a murdered female soldier.
The magazine quoted anonymous sources who told them that Trump said, “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a f***ing Mexican" when he got the bill for the funeral of Vanessa Guillén after offering the family to help paying for it.
Supposedly, he also ordered his chief of staff at the time Mark Meadows not to pay the bill.
Guillén's sister spoke out after the story broke to dispute its allegations.
“I don’t appreciate how you are exploiting my sister’s death for politics – hurtful & disrespectful to the important changes she made for service members,” she wrote. “President Donald Trump did nothing but show respect to my family & Vanessa. In fact, I voted for President Trump today.”
An attorney for the family, Natalie Khawam, and Meadows also disputed the account, with Khawam saying,
After having dealt with hundreds of reporters in my legal career, this is unfortunately the first time I have to go on record and call out Jeffrey Goldberg@the Atlantic: not only did he misrepresent our conversation but he outright LIED in HIS sensational story. More importantly, he used and exploited my clients, and Vanessa Guillen’s murder … for cheap political gain.
As for the accusations of fascism, Vance argued effectively that Trump's previous tenure disproves the entire narrative.
"Donald Trump was president for four years. If he was what John Kelly said he was then why did Donald Trump deliver peace and prosperity? He didn’t arrest his political opponents as Kamala Harris and her Department of the Justice have in fact done," Vance said.
