This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The abortion industry historically has wielded incredible influence over American lawmakers, who have given the lucrative industry hundreds of millions of dollars annually.
But that has set up one of the more egregious offenses in the nation: the fact that Americans of faith, those who believe unborn children should not be killed wantonly, have been forced, through their taxes, to fund the very industry that violates their faith.
That, under President Donald Trump, could be changing.
In fact, a coalition of 150 key leaders and prominent organizations has written to Congress insisting that the cash flow to abortionists be turned off.
"Dear Members of Congress, In November, the American people gave a mandate – it is time for change in Washington. Since then, the White House has taken swift action to stop the Biden abortion agenda and cut government waste. A Republican trifecta presents the opportunity to bolster these efforts by cutting funding for Big Abortion, including Planned Parenthood, through budget reconciliation. Republican reconciliation bills in 2015 and 2017 included a provision to stop giving hard-earned American tax dollars to Big Abortion," the letter explains.
"In 2025, it is even more urgent to cut funding for this industry that endangers women and unborn children and spends tens of millions of dollars to promote woke policies and candidates. Planned Parenthood and groups like it were among those first identified for cost-saving measures by Elon Musk, who singled them out in the Wall Street Journal last November. President Trump has already rolled back funding for abortion groups overseas, but Congressional action is necessary to stop the biggest source of taxpayer cash for the domestic abortion industry – Medicaid."
Signatories on the letter included some of the biggest pro-life organizations and leaders in the nation: Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, ACLJ Action, American College of Pediatricians, Americans United for Life, CatholicVote, Liberty Counsel, Life Legal Defense Foundation, March for Life Action, Christian Defense Coalition, Christian Medical and Dental Associations, Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee, Family Research Council, National Right to Life Committee, National Black Pro-Life Union, Students for Life Action, Thomas More Society, and pages more.
The letter outlined what members of Congress already knew: "Planned Parenthood reports raking in a total of $699.3 million, or almost $2 million per day, from American taxpayers in 2023 alone. Meanwhile, Planned Parenthood's most recent annual report boasted that they performed nearly 393,000 abortions – a 40% market share of the abortion industry in the U.S. Despite their claims to promote 'women's health,' Planned Parenthood consistently opposes basic health and safety standards for their facilities. The New York Times recently reported a litany of unsafe conditions and botched abortions at Planned Parenthood. For example, in one clinic last year 'sewage from a backed-up toilet seeped into the abortion recovery room for two days,' which required employees to shove 'exam table pads under the bathroom door to block the leak.'"
The letter explained, "While leaving patients vomiting from rank conditions, Planned Parenthood prioritized pouring millions of dollars into woke lobbying and trying to defeat Republicans in races from the school board to the presidency. Planned Parenthood boasts that their advocacy and political organizations spent a massive $69.5 million during the 2024 election cycle. Their massive pro-abortion political arm, Planned Parenthood Action Fund, pushes all-trimester abortions and promotes fearmongering lies that put women and girls at needless risk."
The American Center for Law and Justice, one of the groups signing the "legal demand letter," said, "We've defended pro-life counselors, volunteers, and healthcare workers, and we've fought tirelessly to see the day Roe v. Wade was finally overturned. Even now we are engaged in a legal battle with the state of Massachusetts to shut down its current state-funded multimedia smear campaign attacking pro-life Pregnancy Resource Centers in its own state. We've also created our own multimedia counter-campaign to drown out the state's lies with the truth and help desperate mothers find actual options in a safe environment."
But it said there's more work, and the battle against "tax-dollar-gobbling abortion behemoths like Planned Parenthood, which grows richer and more powerful every year, is far from over."
"As it shamelessly touted in its latest annual report, Planned Parenthood received over $792 MILLION in federal reimbursements and grants just last year. And they reported roughly $2 BILLION in revenue after aborting more than 402,000 babies. No matter how many times they say abortion is not their primary business, they're lying – it is," the ACLJ reported.
"No American taxpayer should have to watch the government hand over their hard-earned tax dollars to abortionists like Planned Parenthood to pay for abortions – especially pro-life Americans who, until now, haven't been given a choice," the report said.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Pornography has exploded from "dirty" magazines to a multi-billion-dollar global industry on the web.
It's influencing children more and more as they have access with the click of a computer mouse, it's affecting men's sexual health, it's changing perceptions of reality, it's fueling addictions and it's generating truckloads of cash for the players involved.
But all of a sudden, a speed bump has appeared: One of the most progressive nations in the world abruptly has taken legal action against one of the most popular porn platforms, OnlyFans, after concluding online acts are no different than prostitution.
It is a report in the Washington Stand that has described how the Riksdag, the Swedish parliament, adopted a law forbidding people from offering OnlyFans webcam performers money in exchange for performing a specific sexual act.
"Under the new law, which takes effect July 1, anyone found guilty of buying a personalized sexual act (but not those selling it) face up to one year in prison, and anyone guilty of financially exploiting the person carrying out the sex act could face four years in prison," the report said.
Teresa Carvalho, of the liberal Social Democratic Party, explained, "This is a new form of sex sales and it is high time that we modernize sex sales, and that we also include sales that occur remotely on digital platforms such as OnlyFans."
There is, she confirmed, "a dark picture behind [OnlyFans performances that involve] drugs, human trafficking and abuse, as well as being a gateway to more prostitution."
The law, she said, is intended to protect children and young people.
The Washington Stand reported, "The law criminalizes only paying for personalized interactions, not subscribing to prerecorded pornographic content. But even such a limited protection would eliminate the majority of the pornographic websites' cash flow. Keily Blair, CEO of OnlyFans, told The Wall Street Journal last December that pay-per-view messages make up 59% of the platform's total revenue, while OnlyFans derives 41% from subscription fees."
Marcel van der Watt of the National Center on Sexual Exploitation commended Sweden "for making a concerted effort to confront sex trafficking and prostitution that happens online."
The online prostitution, analysts confirm, is the start of a road that leads to physical prostitution.
Van der Watt said eliminating the "buyers" of prostitution will help bring sexual exploitation to an end.
Reem Alsalem, the United Nations special rapporteur on violence against women and girls, welcomed the move.
"As I recommended in my report on prostitution and [violence against women and girls], States must adopt a standard approach to online and offline prostitution.
The platform itself repeatedly has been accused of misusing and abusing victims, and policymakers have charged that there's evidence of child sexual abuse, sex trafficking, and other forms of exploitation.
Multiple testimonials have confirmed the industry uses and abuses women and girls, and NCOSE sought a Justice Department investigation a year ago on the evidence, but the Joe Biden administration took no action.
The corporations owning such sites shield themselves under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which says they cannot be prosecuted for videos created by others.
Such online images are also blamed regularly for the actions of the mentally unstable, such as stalkers who pursue performers and those who threaten their lives.
The Stand reported: "In 2022, Wisconsin police arrested a 45-year-old former high school swim coach who drove more than 400 miles to stalk an unnamed female OnlyFans creator whom he had been interacting with online. He followed her to a baseball game and paid a boy to hand-deliver a note to her containing $200. He later sent her pictures of her apartment and from the baseball game with the menacing message, 'I was ten feet away from you.' He later said he watched her have sex with her boyfriend through her apartment window and accused her of cheating on him."
The report noted that OnlyFans reported revenue last year of $1.3 billion.
Sweden previously adopted a law to ban buying sexual services "without punishing the seller."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
"MENLO PARK, Calif.—One of California's newest residents recently stepped off a plane after a 16-hour flight from New Delhi." So reports the Wall Street Journal.
California's ruling class wants you to believe the state is thriving again. Their elites point to a small population increase and frame it as a comeback story. The corporate press is hailing it as proof of resilience. But peel back the layers of celebration and the truth emerges, that California's recent "growth" is less about revival and more about replacement. And one man's story exposes the entire deception.
The poster child of this trend is a little-known Indian tech executive named Nagendra Dhanakeerthi, a 39-year-old Indian national who landed in San Francisco in May and walked into a Silicon Valley boardroom just hours later.
The Wall Street Journal elevated his arrival to a symbol of California's rebirth, while AI Squared, the startup that imported him, positioned him as their extraordinary savior of innovation. What neither of them disclosed is how shaky the legal and factual foundation of his entry really is.
According to the Journal, Dhanakeerthi entered the United States under an O-1A visa, a classification reserved exclusively for individuals of extraordinary ability in the sciences, business or education, applicants whose work has garnered sustained national or international acclaim and must be recognized as among the very few at the top of their field.
That standard is not a formality. It is meant to reserve the program for the world's top minds – think Nobel Prize winners, published academics or inventors with global recognition. The bar is intentionally high: Nobel laureates, Fields Medalists, world-renowned academics or top 1% innovators.
But a comprehensive investigation into Dhanakeerthi's background, professional footprint and public presence turns up no evidence that he meets these requirements. He has never won a major international award. There are no scholarly publications in his name. He has not been profiled in peer-reviewed literature or cited for groundbreaking innovation. His resume shows stints at Indian fintech firms like Razorpay and Affle, followed by co-founding a modest startup called Multiwoven, which was later acquired by AI Squared, raising immediate questions about whether the acquisition was designed to manufacture "extraordinary" status to satisfy visa requirements.
While he lists himself as a "builder" with experience in startup ecosystems, Dhanakeerthi's actual work sits firmly in the middle tier of global tech labor, not at the apex. His inclusion in Forbes Technology Council is not a competitive accolade; it is a pay-to-join industry group known for offering "official member" status in exchange for fees. This further undermines any suggestion of elite or exclusive status.
In truth, the available record paints Dhanakeerthi as a journeyman engineer with a decent resume, but nowhere near the caliber the O-1A visa demands. The fact that he was granted this visa despite lacking the required credentials exposes how far the system has strayed from its legal intent.
AI Squared's participation in India's FOSS 2024 developer conference in Bengaluru also reveals deeper ties to India's workforce export infrastructure. The startup has embraced a transnational hiring model that taps into India's massive supply of visa-ready engineers, often displacing American talent in the process. Dhanakeerthi's own career path, from India to Dubai to California, follows a common foreign labor funnel, often backed by Indian consultancies and recruiting firms skilled in working visa systems for maximum gain.
That's what California is celebrating. Not opportunity for Americans, but the successful execution of a foreign labor scheme that leverages loopholes, lax enforcement and a system rigged in favor of foreign nationals over U.S. citizens.
There are thousands of equally or more qualified American engineers, many of them veterans, mid-career professionals or recent graduates who were never even given a chance. They don't get fast-tracked into six-figure jobs with startup equity. They don't get puff pieces in the press. Instead, they're told to learn to code while corporate America hires abroad.
This isn't "growth." It's corporate-engineered displacement, funded by companies, facilitated by foreign governments and quietly endorsed by America's own leaders. Dhanakeerthi is not an exception. He is the template.
When Kimura said, "We paid a lot of money to get him here," the American people should ask: Did that cost include a lawyer to exploit immigration loopholes? Did it include bypassing qualified American workers? And did it include a silent agreement that India's interests now matter more than America's?
While Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is publicly touting the population bump as a sign of California's comeback, maybe he should've picked a better poster boy than a visa-hopping tech bro from Bangalore. If a state's comeback story starts with a six-figure foreign import who needed a lawyer and a loophole to get the job, that's not rebuilding, that's outsourcing. Visa fraud and foreign labor pipelines aren't economic wins, they're surrender flags. This is not how to rebuild an economy. It's how a nation's people get replaced, one visa at a time.
And if this is Newsom's big audition for president, someone should tell him: Propping up your state with paperwork gymnastics and Silicon Valley spin isn't leadership, it's globalist cosplay. America deserves better than a governor who celebrates being replaced.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A nonprofit group that advocates for domestic energy production is calling on Congress to investigate several executive actions during the Biden administration, saying they should be declared null and void based on their allegedly being signed by an autopen.
As reported by Fox News, the organization, Power the Future, reviewed eight Biden executive orders that it says were significant shifts in domestic energy policy and said it found no evidence of the president speaking about any of them publicly, raising concerns that the orders were signed by autopen and that he was not aware of them.
"These are not obscure bureaucratic memos; these were foundational shifts in American energy policy, yet not once did Joe Biden speak about them publicly," Daniel Turner, founder and executive director of Power The Future, told Fox News Digital.
The specific orders cited by the group include an Arctic drilling ban in 2023, a 2021 executive order committing the federal government to net-zero emissions by 2050, an executive order mandating "clean energy" AI centers, and an offshore drilling ban executive order shortly before leaving office in 2025.
Power The Future contacted several federal agencies and House and Senate Oversight Committees, calling for an investigation to determine who actually drafted and approved the orders.
"In light of the growing evidence that actions purportedly taken by the former president may not have been approved or signed by him, but instead promulgated by a small coterie of advisers in his name without his knowledge or over his signature using an 'autopen,' the need for congressional access to information has grown in importance with these revelations," the letter to GOP House Oversight Chairman James Comer states.
"Congress deserves to know how or whether these executive actions were authorized, and whether the former President was aware of such orders before they were implemented by the federal bureaucracy. Were these actions taken on behalf of the president and purporting to execute his authority undertaken with the president's knowledge and approach? It appears incumbent upon Congress to inquire about all parties involved in these actions, who instructed them to do what, when."
On Tuesday, President Trump took to TruthSocial to highlight the autopen scandal, saying, "Other than the Rigged Presidential Election of 2020, the Biggest Scandal in American History is the 'AUTOPEN!'
"Whoever used it was usurping the power of the Presidency, and it should be very easy to find out who that person (or persons) is.
"They did things that a Joe Biden, of sound mind, would have never done, like Open Borders, Transgender for everyone, men in women's sports, and far more. Fear not, however, we will bring America BACK, BIGGER, BETTER, AND STRONGER THAN EVER BEFORE!"
Comer has already identified five Biden aides allegedly involved in the cover-up of Biden's deteriorating cognitive abilities as well as the autopen scandal.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Former FBI Director James Comey is blasting the top two officials at the bureau, Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino, for their lack of experience as well as their re-examination of several unsolved cases, including cocaine found at the White House during Joe Biden's term in office.
On Monday, Bongino posted a message on X stating: "Shortly after swearing in, the Director and I evaluated a number of cases of potential public corruption that, understandably, have garnered public interest. We made the decision to either re-open or push additional resources and investigative attention to these cases.
"These cases are the DC pipe bombing investigation, the cocaine discovery at the prior administration's White House, and the leak of the Supreme Court Dobbs case. I receive requested briefings on these cases weekly and we are making progress. If you have any investigative tips on these matters that may assist us, then please contact the FBI."
Appearing with Wolf Blitzer on CNN Wednesday, Comey said: "It's a little confusing to me, honestly. I'm sure it's a huge adjustment to go from being a podcaster to being the deputy director of the FBI. But I don't understand this tweet."
"First of all, I assume that this investigation of the pipe bomb that was found on Jan. 6 was never closed. The FBI never closes such a thing. So I guess it means they're gonna focus on it more?
"And as to the other things, I thought that the Supreme Court marshal had investigated the leak of the opinion, the draft opinion. I don't know what the FBI's role is there.
"Cocaine at the White House, I thought the Secret Service investigated that. I don't follow it and understand it. I also don't understand who the audience is for this tweet. The FBI often calls for public assistance, or in matters of great public concern, will announce an investigation to reassure the public. This seems much more narrowly targeted, maybe to a former podcast audience."
Blitzer also played a May 8 clip of U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., asking Patel about the fiscal year 2026 budget request for the FBI, which Patel said was not ready at the time.
"I cringe at that clip," Comey remarked. "I actually feel kind of sorry for the guy. It's like showing up for a final exam with no pencils and no paper, and you didn't even know there was a final exam."
"Nothing in their life or in their career gives me confidence that they know anything about leading an organization like that. And so I would have serious doubts. I bet they do internally about whether they have doubts. Great. Let the people who know what they're doing give you advice and listen to them."
Online journalist Benny Johnson noted: "Disgraced James Comey is losing it on live TV over Dan Bongino and Kash Patel reopening investigations into the White House cocaine, the J6 pipe bomber, and the Dobbs leak. This is how you know they are right over the target."
Comey has recently come under fire for posting a photo of shells on the beach arranged to spell out the message: "86 47," which many have said is a threat to assassinate President Donald Trump.
Comey has claimed he thought it was a "political message," but did not believe it was any call to violence against the president.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The FBI is being instructed to investigate the recent chaos in Seattle where rallying Christians were attacked by leftists, and the city's mayor then blamed the Christians for being attacked.
A report at the PostMillennial explains that Dan Bongino, deputy director, has asked the bureau to begin investigating the fracas on Sunday in which Mayday USA, a Christian organization, obtained a permit and held an event in Cal Anderson Park.
Leftists, including antifa, arrived to counter-protest and "then attacked the Christians." Twenty-three arrests were made.
Bruce Harrell, the far-left mayor of Seattle, admitted the Christians were attacked, but wildly claimed they were "far-right" and had no business holding an event in the park because of the presence of the city's LGBT community.
"We have asked our team to fully investigate allegations of targeted violence against religious groups at the Seattle concert. Freedom of religion isn't a suggestion," Bongino explained.
A subsequent protest at City Hall to express opposition to the mayor's anti-Christian statements also resulted in multiple arrests.
Harrell's claim? "Today's far-right rally was held here for this very reason – to provoke a reaction by promoting beliefs that are inherently opposed to our city's values in the heart of Seattle's most prominent LGBTQ+ neighborhood."
His rant continued, "When the humanity of trans people and those who have been historically marginalized is questioned, we triumph by demonstrating our values through our words and peaceful protest – we lose our voice when this is disrupted by violence, chaos, and confusion."
Christians on Tuesday who protested Harrell's anti-faith statements were themselves "protested" by antifa and activists for transgender beliefs.
The report pointed out that it actually was the city that had recommended the park for the event.
A report from Fox News said the original event was a "Don't Mess With Our Kids" rally held by Mayday USA.
Leftists converged on the scene and then created violence.
The latter protest of the mayor's comments, which organizations described as religious bigotry, was called "Rattle in Seattle" and focused on criticizing the mayor's attack on the First Amendment.
"Following the MayDay USA worship event at Cal Anderson Park on Saturday, Mayor Harrell had the audacity to issue a press release blaming Christians for the premeditated violence of Antif,a which resulted in the hospitalization of Seattle Police Department personnel and the arrest of 23 Antifa agitators," the organizers said in a statement. "Under Mayor Harrell's leadership, the city of Seattle has continued its spiral into lawlessness and dysfunction while the First Amendment rights of citizens to peacefully assemble have been disregarded."
The mayor's office, in turn, released comments from multiple leftist religious officials supporting his comments.
The aides of President Joe Biden reportedly took actions they deemed necessary but undemocratic to counteract the threat they perceived from former President Donald Trump, Breitbart reported.
Aides believed they needed to take extraordinary measures to thwart the challenges they saw in Trump's continued influence on U.S. politics. These individuals, according to reports, considered their actions as essential to preserving democracy.
A recent revelation sheds light on a sense of urgency among White House staff to safeguard what they viewed as fundamental democratic processes.
Axios reporter Alex Thompson shared insights from discussions with White House insiders. They believed Trump represented a direct threat to democratic principles and rationalized taking unprecedented measures.
One prominent aide described their strategy by indicating that President Biden's primary task was to secure an electoral win. Following that, the administration could rely on its team to manage pivotal responsibilities.
In Thompson's report, one aide underlined the unique strategy, stating, "He’d only have to show proof of life every once in a while," where focus was heavily placed on the team's actions rather than on the president.
During this time, questions arose concerning the role of the president in decision-making within his administration. Another statement from an aide highlighted the notion that voters primarily elected the team around Biden.
These revelations come at a time when President Biden is confronting substantial personal health challenges, following a prostate cancer diagnosis.
According to a statement released by the president's office, Biden's diagnosis stemmed from recent observations of a prostate nodule. The symptoms had reportedly intensified in recent times.
On Friday, details from the office confirmed that Biden received a prostate cancer diagnosis characterized by a Gleason score of 9, indicating a serious condition with bone metastasis.
The type of cancer, however, is hormone-sensitive, providing avenues for effective management with his doctors reviewing treatment paths.
As Biden and his family discuss treatment plans, the backdrop of a boiling political context makes the timing of these health issues all the more significant.
An anonymous White House official noted that despite rising health concerns, Biden's leadership style, which leaned heavily on his aides, would remain indispensable, exacerbating public concern for transparency.
As Biden's health discussions unfold, attention remains focused on the strategy and actions from within the White House, reflecting wider stirrings within the political landscape.
Thompson indicated that the staff’s sense of duty underlined every decision made during a tumultuous time, as aides continuously evaluated their actions against democratic ideals.
The confluence of these matters raises broader implications, especially with the approaching presidential race, as Biden’s supporters and critics weigh in on the administration's methodology.
While some contend that preserving democracy could justify drastic measures, others express unease over such strategies breaching democratic principles.
This dynamic environment places Biden and his team at the heart of a debate over future governance and the role of leadership in facing contemporary challenges.
President Trump is giving Republicans in the Senate his approval to make whatever changes they wish to the "Big, Beautiful Bill."
The order may come as a shock to House Republicans, who have spent weeks negotiating a delicate compromise between different factions in the party.
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has urged the Senate to make minimal revisions, but Trump wants the Senate to have a say, welcoming "significant" tweaks if needed.
“I want the Senate and the senators to make the changes they want," Trump said. "It will go back to the House and we’ll see if we can get them. In some cases, the changes may be something I’d agree with, to be honest.”
It's a bit of a tone shift from Trump, who had previously slammed "grandstanders" in the House as he pushed Republicans to come together and enact his agenda quickly.
A couple of Republican senators, Ron Johnson (WI.) and Rand Paul (Ky.), are vocally opposed to the bill in its current form, saying it will raise deficits unacceptably.
Senate Majority Leader, John Thune (R-Sd) has already said “the Senate will have its imprint on it," with senators expected to look closely at an increase in the state-and-local tax (SALT) deduction cap - a concession to House Republicans in high-tax blue states - as well as cost-saving reforms to Medicaid that some Republicans are nervous about defending.
The House version of Trump's bill passed last week by only one vote. The bill, which aims to codify Trump's tax reforms and boost funding for immigration enforcement, was the product of a careful compromise between deficit hawks and Republicans who wanted more generous state and local tax (SALT) breaks.
"I encourage them to modify the package that we’re sending over there as little as possible, because we have to maintain that balance, and it’s a very delicate thing," Speaker Johnson told Fox News on Sunday.
The Senate is aiming to pass the bill by July 4, a fitting date for unleashing Trump's promised "golden age" of American renewal.
Getting the bill passed may be easier said than done, but Trump remains optimistic.
“We’ve had a very good response from the Senate and I don’t know how Democrats can’t vote for it,” Trump said. “I think they [Senate Republicans] are going to have changes. Some will be minor, some will be fairly significant.”
"I think it’s going to get there,” Trump said, adding that Johnson and Thune are doing "fantastic."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The Trump administration has confirmed in a new statement that, "We are out of business with Harvard."
Because of the presence of anti-Semitism on campus, and the way it handles student protests and censorship, the White House had asked the school, whose officials are sitting on some $53 billion in piles of endowment cash, to address those issues.
The school declined, and the Trump administration has responded by canceling $2.7 billion in federal contracts and grants, proposing a plan to remove the school's exemption from taxes as well as creating a tax for those endowment accounts, and canceling its permission to enroll foreign students, a plan temporarily suspended by a judge.
Now, the Washington Examiner reports the White House "is set to divert all remaining federal contracts away from Harvard University."
The report noted the General Services Administration has instructed federal agencies to review any contracts they hold with Harvard and end unnecessary contracts, while moving those that are needed to another school.
"Agencies have also been ordered not to consider Harvard for future contracts," the report said.
"We are out of business with Harvard, so look for other vendors for things you would have considered Harvard for," the report confirmed the official explained.
It was Josh Gruenbaum, GSA's commissioner of Federal Acquisition Service, who sent a letter detailing cuts of about another $100 million form the school.
"As fiduciaries to the taxpayer, the government has a duty to ensure that procurement dollars are directed to vendors and contractors to promote and champion principles of non-discrimination in the national interests," he wrote.
Instead of agreeing to address anti-Semitism on campus, the school sued to keep getting billions of dollars from taxpayers.
Also, the school now is under investigation by the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security.
President Donald Trump, in fact, has suggested that the $3 billion that Harvard had been getting from taxpayers instead go to trade schools.
Further, the newest decision letter confirms that Harvard has failed to comply with a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court in 2023.
"As relevant here, GSA understands that Harvard continues to engage in race discrimination, including in its admissions process and in other areas of student life. For applicants in the top academic decile, admissions rates varied significantly by race. In this decile, admissions rates were: 56% for African Americans; 31% for Hispanics, 15% for whites; 13% for Asians," Gruenbaum's letter explained.
"Harvard has shown no indication of reforming their admission process."
He also cited "Troubling revelations have come to light regarding Harvard and its affiliates' potential discriminatory hiring practices and possible violations of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Harvard is suspected of engaging in a pattern or practice of disparate treatment in hiring, promotion, compensation, and other personnel-related actions."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The American people have lost jobs. They've watched industries shipped overseas, their towns hollowed out by corporate greed and globalist interests. But most Americans still don't know the latest betrayal: Both Democrat and Republican state governments are now fueling that collapse with American workers' retirement savings.
According to India's Consul General Ramesh Babu Lakshmanan in Atlanta and U.S. Consul General Mike Hankey in India, states like California, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Texas, Pennsylvania, Florida and Tennessee have invested over $50 billion directly or indirectly into India. On top of that, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation has injected another $4 billion.
And this is just the tip of the iceberg. U.S. pension and endowment managers now control $1.8 trillion in assets targeted for even deeper exposure to the Indian economy. Consul General Hankey, who led the "Building Financial Futures" roadshow with India's Ministry of Finance, called the plan a "win-win." He boasted that top executives from U.S. public pension funds representing all 50 states had come together to "boost U.S. investment into India."
"It is going to deliver good returns for hard-working Americans," Hankey declared. "At the same time, it's going to enable and accelerate what India is doing as it grows and as its stature in the world grows."
America's own diplomats are now championing this offshoring agenda
U.S. Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti has told investors to embrace India as the future: "If you want to see the future, come to India. If you want to feel the future, come to India. If you want to work on the future, come to India."
India's ambitions aren't hidden. As laid out by India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, the playbook is simple: "The weaker player solicits or manipulates stronger forces to its advantage". This is not a defensive posture, but a calculated, opportunistic game; India plays every side, commits to none. The goal isn't alliances, but leverage.
Jaishankar's doctrine rejects traditional partnerships, exploits global rivalries and treats the West not as a friend, but as a tool for India's advancement. As U.S. pension dollars pour into India, American retirees are being forced to bankroll a foreign government that sees them not as allies, but as a means to its own rise.
Ambassadors like Garcetti, after praising India's economic "miracle," now frame investment in India as the next patriotic move for Americans looking to leave China behind. But in reality, the only winners are the global investment firms, foreign governments and corporate elites orchestrating the largest transfer of American wealth, jobs and opportunity in recent history.
India's government, its politicians and corporate backers repeat the same message: To outcompete China, America must build up India. Jaishankar's own book, "The India Way," makes it clear that India's rise is built on exploiting rivalries and drawing in Western capital, never on genuine partnership or shared sacrifice.
Ambassador Eric Garcetti has encouraged deeper ties with India, describing the country as a democratic alternative to China. But the question remains: What is the long-term cost of duplicating the China strategy with another foreign economic giant?
America funds its own decline: U.S. pension cash flows to Indian industry
The United States has become the largest foreign portfolio investor into India making up over 39% of assets under custody for India. These include equities, private equity partnerships, real assets and early-stage ventures that directly or indirectly benefit from offshored U.S. labor and government contracts.
Funds such as Florida's SBA have committed $300 million to $500 million through Asia Alternatives. California's CalPERS, alongside pensions in New Jersey and New York, have funded Indian equities, tech hubs and logistics startups through opaque partnerships with Indian capital firms. These platforms often invest in firms that are direct beneficiaries of outsourcing arrangements from American companies.
Trade & Investments: India and South East USA
$300 million in Pennsylvania teacher's pension funds Invested in troubled firms in India
Fraud and systemic risk: Will Americans ever see those returns?
India's stock markets have posted record growth, but beneath that boom lies a dark reality. On average, over 400 stock-related fraud complaints were filed daily in 2024. Cyber fraud jumped fourfold and unsanctioned trades by brokers hit record highs.
According to the PwC India 2024 survey, 59% of Indian companies experienced economic fraud, compared to a global average of 41%. Procurement scams, bribery and cyber fraud dominate India's corporate landscape.
Hankey claims India is "stable" and "transparent." Yet only 2% of Indian financial influencers are registered and 63% fail to disclose financial ties. India's securities fraud is not just frequent, it is systemic and even regulators warn that investor trust is on the verge of collapse.
Scam after scam has defrauded U.S. citizens and global investors alike:
And the list goes on and on.
India's Stock Market Mania Sparks Surge in Financial Frauds and Cybercrimes
The investments raise questions of legality, ethics and public trust. And the scale and structure of these investments raise multiple red flags. U.S. fiduciaries are legally obligated to act in the best interest of beneficiaries. Investment decisions must be based on transparency, risk mitigation and long-term security. To date no official has yet explained how funding India's digital economy, infrastructure and workforce aligns with the economic interests of American workers and retirees.
Yet these funds are being invested in foreign markets with high systemic risk, including:
Worse, many of these investments are funneled through black-box intermediaries like Asia Alternatives, Blackstone and private equity firms that do not disclose their full holdings, leaving pensioners and taxpayers in the dark.
Exporting your future: What America loses every time India wins
This is no longer a trade debate. This is about state-sponsored capital transfer where American cities, schools and workers are stripped of their economic base while foreign governments grow stronger using U.S. dollars.
As American families struggle to pay rent, get healthcare and afford college, their own government is funding India's rise, not their own. As workers lose jobs to H-1B visa holders, Indian firms grow richer funded by U.S. pension capital. And while Indian billionaires profit, America's middle class is being erased.
As one Indian official proudly stated, the influx of U.S. pension funds will allow India to "unlock $800 billion in infrastructure development over the next decade."
That's $800 billion not invested in American bridges, broadband, manufacturing or workers.
That's $800 billion diverted from the future of American retirees, children and veterans into the coffers of a foreign state that openly says it wants to replace the West as the global rule-maker.
This is not a partnership. It is a hostile economic takeover sponsored by the very people elected to defend Americans. The final question is not whether this strategy helps India. It clearly does. The question is: Who in Washington will stand up and stop it?
The people responsible for undermining your retirement security, shipping your jobs overseas, and selling out our country for foreign gain are counting on your silence.
Don't let them get away with it.
Follow my ongoing investigations at WND.com and stay tuned for more exposés uncovering how global power games, foreign manipulation and corrupt policymaking are dismantling America from the inside.