A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump's administration from deporting illegal immigrants outside of their country of origin, Breitbart reported. U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy imposed a due process standard.

The judge ruled Friday that the federal government could not send deportees to a third country outside their "order of removal without first allowing them to raise concerns about their safety." A deportation order would typically include the migrants' homeland or another destination of their choosing.

Murphy said that the administration is attempting to send deportees to nations "where they may be immediately tortured and killed, without providing that person any opportunity to tell the deporting authorities that they face grave danger or death because of such a deportation." The judge cited a supposed myriad of precedents in his written memorandum.

No Uncertain Terms

The Trump administration has been aggressive on border security, having campaigned on the issue during the 2024 presidential election. One of the ways he has sought to do that is by deporting criminal illegal aliens under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act.

The Supreme Court backed Trump earlier this month by overturning a U.S. District Judge James Boasberg's block. However, The New York Times described the decision as "narrow and focused on the proper venue for the cases," rather than granting blanket permission.

Notably, the individuals being deported in these cases are members of gangs designated as terrorist organizations. Still, Murphy slammed the administration for "removing aliens to third countries without notice and an opportunity to be heard on fear-based claims — in other words, without due process."

The judge has further restricted the administration's power to remove these dangerous criminals in Friday's decision. "The irreparable harm factor likewise weighs in Plaintiffs’ favor," Murphy pointed out about the challenged deportation.

"Here, the threatened harm is clear and simple: persecution, torture, and death. It is hard to imagine harm more irreparable," Murphy claimed.

Strange Bedfellows

Because the Democrats will oppose Trump on anything and everything, they have gone all in on defending criminal illegal aliens. This has made for strange bedfellows as Democratic lawmakers fall all over themselves for an alleged MS-13 gang member, Abrego Garcia.

Initial reports said that Garcia was deported by mistake, and Democrats ran with that, according to Fox News. Oregon Democratic Rep. Maxine Dexter was only the latest to appeal for his release from El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center on Friday.

"This is not just one family’s nightmare; it is a constitutional crisis that should outrage every single one of us. I will travel to El Salvador to confront this crisis head-on. Our constitutional rights are on the line," she claimed.

The only problem is that the White House confirmed Garcia was indeed a member of the gang, with tattooed fingers and a record of violence to prove it. He was accused of domestic violence against his wife and human trafficking.

The lengths the left will go to defend illegal immigrants is shocking. Trump's administration will keep fighting even as the Democrats and their cronies on the court attempt to thwart the president and the will of the people.

Former child actor Haley Joel Osment was caught on video spewing antisemitic slurs and calling a police officer a "f----- Nazi" during an April 8 arrest, the Daily Caller reported. The newly released police body camera footage showed the "Sixth Sense" actor being handcuffed for public intoxication.

The 37-year-old was busted at California's Mammoth Mountain ski resort. Osment was arrested for public intoxication, but police found cocaine residue in his ski helmet in the course of the arrest.

The "Secondhand Lions" actor was uncooperative and initially refused to give his name to the arresting officers. "I’m an American," he told officers flippantly.

"Well, you’re under arrest now," the officer told Osment. Police cuffed Osment, whose ski pants were inexplicably unbuttoned and falling down as he struggled to stand up and follow instructions. He was taken into police custody only briefly and was later released.

Embarrassing Situation

Osment found himself in an embarrassing situation after ski patrol and the police were called to the area around 2 p.m. for reports of an intoxicated individual, the New York Post reported. They encountered the former child actor, who was combative and sometimes uncooperative.

The police video was heavily redacted, but it showed Osment hurling insults at police. "I’ve been kidnapped by a f------- Nazi," Osment yelled at one point and insisted he was "being attack." He also said the officers were "torturing me."

However, officers were using restraint even as Osment was causing trouble for them as they tried to do their job. At one point, they had to tell him to "use your legs and stand up" while trying to take him into custody.

Once in the back of the police car, Osment continued his tirade, telling officers they were "f------ with my life." He also used an anti-Jewish slur at one of the officers, insisting, "I was decent to you and you, and you are a f------ k---," Osment said.

Unfortunate Turn

Osment's life has taken a turn for the worse, but this isn't the first time he's had a run-in with the law over substance abuse. In 2006, Osment was arrested for driving while intoxicated after he hit a mailbox and overturned his vehicle.

In a statement to The Post, Osment expressed regret about his behavior during the recent arrest and said he would "promise to atone for my terrible mistake." He explained that he has been in a bad way since he lost his home in January to one of the wildfires in Altadena.

"I’m absolutely horrified by my behavior. Had I known I used this disgraceful language in the throes of a blackout, I would have spoken up sooner," Osment claimed. "The past few months of loss and displacement have broken me down to a very low emotional place," he added.

"But that’s no excuse for using this disgusting word. From the bottom of my heart, I apologize to absolutely everyone that this hurts. What came out of my mouth was nonsensical garbage – I’ve let the Jewish community down and it devastates me," Osment said

Osment is not the only child star to have a tumultuous adult life, but that doesn't make it any better for him. Hopefully, this latest humiliating encounter will be a wake-up call for Osment.

Kevin Hassett, chair of the White House National Economic Council, has confirmed that the Trump administration is looking to replace Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.

Speaking to reporters on Friday at the White House, Hassett confirmed that the Trump administration is exploring their options to remove Powell despite the legal obstacles preventing President Donald Trump from outright dismissing him. 

Trump has been unhappy with Powell and wants him gone to complete the removal of elements from former President Joe Biden's time in the White House.

Powell is not in alignment with Trump's goals and has refused to cooperate with the White House on economic policy.

Speaking to reporters, Hassett stated that, “The president and his team will continue to study" the options available to give Powell the boot and replace him with someone who will support Trump's agenda.

Fed vs. White House

The Federal Reserve and the White House have been bound for conflict ever since President Donald Trump's confirmation as President back in January.

The Federal Reserve's independence from the executive branch means that Trump has less power to unilaterally effect change.

Trump has gone on a firing spree, removing executive officials appointed by Joe Biden by the dozen. The Trump administration has made it a priority to purge former Biden officials, and that includes Powell, who was the architect of many of Biden's disastrous economic policies.

In a post on Truth Social on Thursday, President Trump tore into Powell, saying he couldn't wait for his "termination" after Powell refused to cut interest rates, which are still holding back economic activity.

Powell is protected by a Supreme Court precedent that has existed nearly as long as the Federal Reserve has. Trump can't dismiss Powell unless he's found to have committed misconduct or severe neglect of office.

But that isn't stopping the White House from exploring their options to get rid of the defiant Powell, who shows no signs of stepping down from his position.

Reining In The Federal Reserve

The Federal Reserve has enjoyed a level of unearned independence and weilds an incredible amount of power for not being either elected by the people or under the rule of the president elected by the American people.

Powell himself has shown himself to be a political actor, as many of his stances have changed since the election of Donald Trump. After years of acting like massive spending wasn't an issue, Powell suddenly decided to criticize Trump's tariff plans that will supposedly cost too much, unlike Biden's insane and reckless spending.

Hassett called Powell out on this by saying, "Having everybody that refused to warn about the runaway spending out there, saying, ‘Oh, this is going to be a catastrophe for inflation because of the tariffs,’ means that people need to improve their models and improve their messaging."

Powell is an actor of the establishment and will fight Trump's attempts to effect genuine reform, and as such, must be removed, even if it means overturning decades of legal precedent.

A call for the impeachment of President Donald Trump has been issued by a Democratic House member, spotlighting the contentious handling of a Supreme Court ruling related to an El Salvadoran deportation case.

The controversy revolves around the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose removal to El Salvador was deemed an "administrative error" amid conflicting claims about his alleged criminal affiliations, Breitbart reported. 

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court ordered that Garcia should be released following his erroneous deportation to El Salvador. The deportation occurred under an initiative by the Trump administration, which targeted alleged Venezuelan gang members. Despite the court's directive, the Trump administration has opted not to retrieve Garcia immediately, underscoring its position of presidential discretion in foreign affairs.

Supreme Court's Decision Sparks Outrage

Garcia's situation became a focal point after a U.S. District Judge found probable cause to hold the administration in criminal contempt. The deportation was a breach of a prior 2019 immigration judge's ruling that Garcia could not be sent to El Salvador due to potential persecution.

Amidst these legal battles, Garcia's lawyers have insisted that his deportation was a mistake. They argued that Garcia had not engaged in criminal activities and had adhered to immigration protocols. However, conflicting assertions have arisen from various sides regarding his alleged gang affiliations.

Contentious Claims And Senate Response

The White House has maintained that Garcia was significantly involved with MS-13, a gang labeled as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by President Trump. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that Garcia played a leadership role in MS-13 and was involved in human trafficking activities.

Justice Department representatives countered judicial critiques by stating that judges do not hold control over the president’s authority in foreign policy. Congressman Shri Thanedar has been vocal, expressing that Trump has not adhered to a lawful Supreme Court ruling, openly supporting a move towards impeachment.

Local Law Enforcement Weighs In

Sheriff Jeff Gahler of Harford County, Maryland, underscored the Trump administration's stance by claiming Garcia is a "1000%" confirmed MS-13 member and identified domestic abuser. This assertion adds to the complex backdrop of security and legal debates surrounding Garcia's deportation.

While these allegations complicate the narrative, Garcia’s legal advocates continue pressing for his rights under immigration law, emphasizing the lack of evidence for his criminal involvement. The controversy underscores broader debates about immigration policies and executive power.

Moving Forward Amidst Legal Disputes

As the debate intensifies, the Justice Department has highlighted the significance of presidential prerogatives in international engagements, deflecting criticisms over the deportation's execution. This ongoing legal and political turmoil has captured national attention, drawing scrutiny to the administration’s actions.

The Democratic legislator's impeachment call places additional pressure on Trump and could amplify Congressional debates. The outcome may set important precedents for how immigration rulings are managed under executive discretion in the future.

Future Implications And Congressional Actions

With the Supreme Court’s role spotlighted in the unfolding events, discussions regarding its enforcement power continue. The court's inability to compel immediate action emphasizes challenges in balancing judicial rulings with the executive's diplomatic considerations.

As the story evolves, Congress and the public are closely watching potential steps from both the executive and judicial branches. The implications of this case extend beyond one individual, potentially shaping future immigration and foreign policy discourse.

Ultimately, this case could propel wider dialogue on congressional oversight and the legal complexities inherent in executing Supreme Court decisions. As parties involved navigate these turbulent waters, the nation awaits clarity and resolution on the contentious matter.

President Donald Trump's tax cuts during his first term in the White House in 2017 still remains one of his most popular and controversial moves.

However, according to JustTheNews, a new poll revealed that voters in over 20 congressional swing districts want the tax cuts extended and believe they are a good thing for the American economy.

The poll, which clearly shows the popularity of Trump's tax cuts in some of the most important congressional districts across the country, was commissioned by the National Taxpayers Union.

Americans in those districts, and millions more across the country worried about the current high living costs, made it clear that they want the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 to be extended indefinitely, which Trump promised to do during his 2024 presidential campaign.

What's going on?

The survey wasn't complicated, and simply asked voters in 21 congressional swing districts whether or not they believe Trump's 2017 tax cuts are good for them and for the American economy.

The outlet noted:

The survey found that 81% of respondents said their cost of living had increased in the past year, with most expecting further increases in the coming years. Meanwhile, 80% said they will struggle to meet their basic needs, like affording groceries and utilities, if their taxes increase.

The poll also found that 52% of those same voters want the tax cuts to be made permanent. Only 36% disagreed with that option.

The end of the year could be a massive bummer for millions of American families if Trump's tax cuts are not extended, as it would mean the average family pays about $1,700 more in taxes.

Pete Sepp, president of the National Taxpayers Union, released a statement on the findings of the poll his organization conducted.

"Americans fresh off tax season are frustrated by the time and money they spent to file and pay their taxes this year, and they’re worried about the next blow to their wallets," he wrote in a statement.

Sepp added, "Americans fresh off tax season are frustrated by the time and money they spent to file and pay their taxes this year, and they’re worried about the next blow to their wallets."

Social media agrees

Users across social media agreed with the results of the poll.

"This is why we elected Trump and gave the GOP control. Congress better earn it," one X user wrote.

Another X user wrote, "Now that we know exactly how the feds are stealing and wasting our money, of course sane people want to pay fewer taxes."

President Donald Trump had plenty of legal issues leading up to his election, and while he managed to navigate most of those just fine, he faces a new challenge of judicial activism regarding his bold and decisive border policies.

One of those issues deals with U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who attempted to halt the Trump administration's deportation flights last month, specifically the flights bringing violent and dangerous illegal migrants to El Salvador for imprisonment.

According to The Hill, after Boasberg called for contempt proceedings against the president and his administration, a divided appeals court shot down that notion this week, scoring a win for Trump and his lawyers. 

Judge Boasberg is one of several federal judges, all of whom were appointed by Democratic presidents, who have attempted to interfere with Trump's executive powers to manage the southern border crisis as he sees fit.

What's going on?

The federal appeals court released its decision this week, essentially saying the Trump administration has a right to the appeals process before legal actions can be taken.

The Hill reported:

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit indicated its order is intended to provide “sufficient opportunity” for the court to consider the government’s appeal and “should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion.”

Judge Boasberg, last week, had found grounds for contempt, slamming the Trump administration's refusal to turn the deportation flights around "a willful disregard" of the federal court's order.

Not surprisingly, the federal appeals court in charge of the decision split down party lines. The Hill noted:

The three-judge D.C. Circuit panel split 2-1. The two Trump appointees, Judges Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao, ruled for the administration. Judge Cornelia Pillard, an appointee of former President Obama, dissented.

Judge Pillard wrote, "In the absence of an appealable order or any clear and indisputable right to relief that would support mandamus, there is no ground for an administrative stay."

Judge Boasberg has been on Trump's radar -- and not a good one -- ever since he intervened in the president's decision to utilize the rare and nearly-forgotten Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport certain illegal aliens.

Calls for impeachment

Users across social media weighed in on the ongoing situation, with some calling for Boasberg's impeachment as a result of his seeming activism.

"This man belongs as far away from the bench as possible. There is no room for activists in the judiciary," one X user wrote.

Another X user wrote, "He should not serve as a judge."

What would have otherwise been a cheerful and celebratory swearing-in ceremony for Dr. Mehmet Oz at the Oval Office turned into a scary medical situation for one of his young granddaughters.

According to the Daily Mail, Dr. Oz, who was appointed by Trump as the administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), was set to be sworn in at the Oval Office earlier this week until his granddaughter, Philomena, 11, passed out.

The moment came just after Dr. Oz had a question-and-answer session with President Donald Trump at the White House.

Reports indicated that after Trump answered a question about nuclear weapons, Dr. Oz's daughter began yelling, "Philo fainted, Philo fainted. Dad, go!"

What happened?

Several people, including Dr. Oz, rushed over to where the medical episode took place, while others hurried the press out of the room. One White House aide shouted, "Everybody out!"

Multiple videos and pictures from the moment it happened and the resulting chaos were posted across social media.

"UPDATE: The White House confirms a minor family member fainted during Dr. Oz’s swearing-in ceremony in the Oval Office. She has since recovered and is okay, according to officials," Next News Network reported at the time.

It was later reported that the young girl had recovered from the incident and was doing well after being checked out.

"A minor family member fainted during Dr. Oz’s swearing in ceremony in the Oval Office,” the White House said in a statement to PEOPLE. “We are happy to say she is okay."

Social media reaction

Users across social media reacted to the situation and Trump's response, with many praising the president for directing attention to what was happening in the room.

"Trump stops everything when someone falls out in his audience, even if that audience has 25,000 people," one X user wrote.

Another X user wrote, "Notice how Trump never runs away. He runs to the roar. Whatever is happening, he'll move to help."

Thankfully, all is well and the young girl will be fine.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

Joe Biden, after decades as a politician on some fairly good salaries in Washington, and after his family took in tens of millions of dollars in what appeared to be an influence peddling scheme during his time in office, now is a former president, and is trying to make a bit of income from giving speeches, like so many out-of-office politicos.

He's signed with an agency and outlined his demands: $300,000 per speech, plus a jet if travel is involved, plus expenses for a full staff to accompany him.

But, it seems, no one is buying.

A comment at the Gateway Pundit delivered a devastating assessment of Biden: "Apparently, there isn't much of a market for angry, yelling, incoherent babbling speeches from former presidents who have difficulty forming sentences."

It was the New York Post that revealed, "It's not just Biden family artwork that's struggling to sell these days. Former President Joe Biden's attempt to bill $300,000 per speaking appearance is finding few takers, The Post has learned — as some of his own former aides say it's time for the 82-year-old to leave the spotlight for good after reminiscing about 'colored kids' Tuesday in his first public address since leaving office."

Biden has established a reputation for telling wild and untrue stories during his days campaigning and in office.

His speeches typically feature long periods of mumbling, interspersed with sudden bouts of shouting and screaming.

"I'M NOT KIDDING" is a popular insert on just about any topic.

Biden has been known to call on dead people while speaking, and often insults listeners, once calling someone a "dog-faced pony soldier."

The Post reported that a source familiar with Biden's "faltering speaking career" confirmed the $300,000 price tag.

Biden has been represented since February by the Creative Artists Agency, and delivered his "first public speech since leaving office Tuesday, stumbling when he referred to 'colored kids,'" the report said.

He had spoken earlier, but nobody covered it.

The Post's source said, "CAA is having trouble booking gigs, which isn't surprising."

The report cited Biden's "history of peddling glaring inaccuracies before his political career came to a crashing end when he delivered incoherent debate remarks that prompted a Democratic mutiny."

The CAA declined to comment to the Post on the topic.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center.

An instructor at Washington State University who was captured on security video beating up a student who was wearing a MAGA hat is learning the cost of his political violence: His job.

The professor, Patrick Mahoney, "has been fired from his post," according to the Daily Mail.

The video showed Mahoney, "along with student Gerald Hoff, ripped Jay Sani's hat from him while outside of a bar near the Pullman campus on February 28."

The video confirms Sani, who is Indian-American, was pushed to the ground by the two men and punched repeatedly. He was left with scrapes and bruises and reported the assault to police.

The university later confirmed that Mahoney was "relieved of all teaching responsibilities."

"Washington State University is aware of an off-campus incident that occurred last February involving a WSU staff member and a graduate student. After an investigation conducted by the City of Pullman's police department, and in accordance with WSU policies, the staff member's employment has been terminated. The second individual involved was a graduate student serving as a teaching assistant. He was not a Washington State University professor. This person has been relieved of all teaching responsibilities."

The report said the video was first obtained by Turning Point USA Frontlines reporter Jonathan Choe, and it confirmed that policy bodycam footage confirmed the offenders "admitted to the assault."

Mahoney, to the police, tried to blame the victim.

The two attackers have also been arrested and charged with assault.

A Facebook post said, "A fight ensued, which resulted in Jay Sani being thrown onto the concrete. This caused Jay Sani to bleed and suffer further injuries. One or more of them then proceeded to kick Jay Sani while he collapsed on the concrete."

The report noted that Mahoney "has been active in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, including advocating for the Pullman City Council to sign a Gaza ceasefire resolution."

President Donald Trump's administration is considering closing as many as 30 consulates and embassies worldwide, the Kenya Times reported. This would impact Europe and Asia, but more than half of the closures could affect Africa.

The State Department is looking to cut 50% of its yearly budget and hopes to slash foreign aid by nearly 75%. The closings of foreign outposts would go a long way toward getting that plan in action.

On the chopping block are European embassies in countries like Luxembourg and Malta, as well as consulates across Asia and Europe. However, as shown in a map from CNN shared to X, formerly Twitter, Africa would have the most embassies cut, while Europe would see several of its consulates disappear.

Global Footprint

Running embassies and consulates is expensive and may have arguably small benefits in certain nations. Still, the left is breathlessly warning about the dire consequences of this cost-cutting measure.

For instance, State Department internal documents indicate that the diplomatic arrangements in Iraq and Somalia could impact the ongoing counterterrorism activities from there. However, the initiative wouldn't eliminate the U.S. presence but tighten up the coverage.

Some consulates and embassies are redundant when there is a nearby outpost that can easily cover for both areas. The purpose of these entities is to help American citizens with issues while in the countries where the outposts are located.

They can process visas or provide other help to American citizens, but they are also tasked with diplomacy. This is especially important in adversarial nations like China, where information gathering helps officials in Washington, D.C. make policy decisions from afar.

Despite all the handwringing, it appears that the closures will be strategic and not leave territories completely uncovered. The State Department documents recommend "resizing" of some missions using the plan already undertaken in Canada and Japan "as a model large mission by consolidating consulate support into a specialized unit," where possible.

Democrats React

According to Fox News, the embassy and consulate closures are part of a larger cost-saving plan.  However, lawmakers like Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, who is the leading Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, warned that these cuts "would leave our country alone and exposed and allow China and Russia to fill the vacuum made vacant by this administration."

However, according to State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce, these fears are overblown. "Throughout the history of the United States, everyone has a budget plan and everyone has ideas for budgets," she explained.

"And every president has a budget plan and sends it to Congress. And then Congress either accepts it or they have their own ideas, which happens more often than not," Bruce said.

"There is no final plan, final budget," Bruce added. There are many checks and balances in place for these sorts of moves, but that doesn't stop the left from pouncing at the first hint of cuts anywhere.

It's crucial for the U.S. to have an international presence, but there are certainly ways to streamline it. Trump has been working hard to cut the waste out of government spending, and that's what he was elected to do, whichever way he sees most fit to do so.

Patriot News Alerts delivers timely news and analysis on U.S. politics, government, and current events, helping readers stay informed with clear reporting and principled commentary.
© 2026 - Patriot News Alerts