A top adviser to President Donald Trump says federal judges trying to stop the America First agenda are now "completely out of control" and are "basically usurping the power of the president."
The remarks by Kari Lake, U.S. Agency for Global Media senior adviser and former Arizona gubernatorial candidate, came on "Sunday Morning Futures" with Maria Bartiromo on the Fox News Channel.
"The president has Article II powers to run the executive branch of this government, and we're seeing a whole handful of judges trying to stop that and really subvert the will of the people," Lake said.
"The beautiful thing about President Trump is he wants to come in and bring this government under control."
Lake added that she doesn't think the obstructions will work in the end.
"I believe that eventually, these cases will move higher up and President Trump will be victorious, but unfortunately, it's the delay that's preventing the work from being done."
"I wish we could just skip right over and get to the Supreme Court and get this taken care of. Because in many of these cases, you've got Soros-linked attorneys who are just trying to make some money and delay the president's agenda.
"And you've got judges who, in many cases, may be compromised. We're seeing some of this around the country. Why are they doing this? And so, I think it will eventually get to the Supreme Court.
"My concern, and I believe the concern of the American people, is the delay and the time that is ticking away, keeping President Trump, keeping people like me that he has brought in and hired to do our job, and it's very concerning that judges are behaving this way. I would rather follow the Constitution than a judge who's got an agenda."
When asked about a Wisconsin judge arrested this week for allegedly trying to thwart federal immigration officials by helping an illegal alien avoid capture, Lake responded, "If you break the law, you end up being charged. If you break the law, you end up in handcuffs, and it appears that this judge broke the law."
"We're making sure that the law is applied here. Doesn't matter if you're a judge or if you're a regular, everyday person. And so I think if she broke the law, if what is said about what happened, what transpired in that courthouse, is true, then she deserves to be, frankly, in handcuffs. … She will get her due process, and we will figure out what happened."
"It's appalling that a judge would try to harbor or protect an illegal immigrant," Lake added. "The victim that he allegedly abused was right there in the courtroom, and she's trying to protect the abuser and the illegal immigrant."
Lake concluded: "It's unbelievable what's happening in this country right now, and this is just an attempt, in my opinion, to stop President Trump and his America First agenda that the people overwhelmingly voted for. Thankfully, the president has brought in some really good fighters to D.C., people who don't want to become permanent creatures. I'm just as happy to DOGE myself out of a job, and go on and help President Trump in another way. But he's brought in people who want to get the job done. And these judges are trying to stop its from getting the job done."
"In the end we will prevail. It's gonna take a little bit of time, and it's unfortunate these judges don't care more about America and the will of the American people."
A county judge in Milwaukee has been arrested by the FBI and now is facing two felony charges, including obstruction, for allegedly concealing an illegal alien sought by federal authorities for deportation and helping him escape federal agents, who were waiting at the court to arrest him.
It is Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan who now finds herself on the wrong side of the courtroom desk.
The 65-year-old appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries in the federal courthouse, but made no public comments. Her lawyer, Craig Mastantuono, however, claimed Dugan "wholeheartedly regrets and protests her arrest. It was not made in the interest of public safety."
FBI chief Kash Patel said in a statement that was posted online, deleted, then reposted, "Just NOW, the FBI arrested Judge Hannah Dugan out of Milwaukee, Wisconsin on charges of obstruction — after evidence of Judge Dugan obstructing an immigration arrest operation last week. We believe Judge Dugan intentionally misdirected federal agents away from the subject to be arrested in her courthouse, Eduardo Flores Ruiz, allowing the subject — an illegal alien — to evade arrest. Thankfully, our agents chased down the perp on foot, and he's been in custody since, but the Judge's obstruction created increased danger to the public."
A report at Fox News said Dugan allegedly hid the illegal alien "in her jury room in order to stop that person from being arrested by ICE."
The report explained that when Dugan found out that the federal agents were intending to make an arrest, she "demanded that the officers proceed to the chief judge's office. At that point, they say the judge left and that the undocumented individual's hearing concluded and that he had quickly left the building."
The situation developed on April 18 when the illegal was in for a court hearing.
Earlier, Dugan claimed that local reports about her behavior were not accurate.
Fox reported that state Rep. Bob Donovan, a Republican, charged, "In all my years of Milwaukee politics and public safety issues, working with cops, district attorneys, and judges, I have never seen a more irresponsible act by an officer of the court, let alone a judge, if true.
"This borders on obstruction of justice, and I hope the FBI continues a thorough investigation and, if warranted, prosecution to the fullest extent of the law."
The report said Dugan has worked with legal aid organizations over the course of her career.
The Washington Examiner said the U.S. Marshals Service confirmed Dugan was arrested at 8:30 a.m. Friday.
New York Knicks basketball legend Dick Barnett died over the weekend in his sleep at an assisted living facility in Florida, according to the New York Post.
The Knicks announced Barnett's death on Monday.
He played in the NBA for 14 seasons and was traded to the Knicks by the Lakers in 1965. During his eight seasons with the Knicks, he led them to two championships in 1970 and 1973.
He averaged 21 points a game with the Knicks and was inducted into the Basketball Hall of Fame in 2024.
"Fallback Baby"
Barnett got the nickname "Fallback Baby" for his unique jump shot, during which he kicked his feet up and back, then fell back a little bit on the way down.
Examples of what it looked like are shown in the video below.
Another unique thing about Barnett was that he was a lefty.
"Built the legacy"
“He’s one of the architects who built the legacy of what the Knicks were about,” his successor Earl Monroe said. “No one can ever forget that.”
“Dick was one of the leaders of that team,” teammate Phil Jackson said. “I really thought he held a big piece of our success in the late ’60s and early ’70s.”
“He’s got one of the best basketball minds of any player I’ve ever known,” Eddie Donovan, the Knicks general manager who acquired Barnett from the Lakers, said. “Everything he does is for a purpose.”
Later years
After retiring from basketball, Barnett authored multiple books, earned a doctorate from Fordham University, and taught sports management at St. John’s.
He credited an Achilles tendon injury early in his career with causing him to focus on his studies and get his degree, just in case he couldn't keep playing ball.
“Dreams really do come true,” he told the MSG Network in 2020. “Life is a continuum. Just because I achieved this goal doesn’t mean I’m through. There are other goals."
Trump national security adviser Mike Waltz had continued praise for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth amid continued controversy including alleged leaks, security lapses and reports of chaos in the Defense Department under his leadership.
Fox News's Maria Bartiromo asked Waltz Sunday whether the Trump administration would be able to accomplish its foreign policy goals under "what appears to be a chaotic, weakened Defense Department."
"I'll tell you about a weakened Pentagon," Waltz fired back promptly. "That was one that had a Defense Secretary that disappeared for two weeks just last year, and nobody knew about it."
Waltz pointed out that Hegseth is "leading from the front" in contrast to his predecessor and praised early reform efforts at the Pentagon.
False "media narrative"
"He is leading the charge, and he has no tolerance for leaking," Waltz said, denying the reports of chaos as a "media narrative" that they would "power through."
Waltz also had a more positive take on the recent departure of top aides including Hegseth's Chief of Staff Joe Kasper last week.
"Maria, there’s 20,000 people in the Pentagon," Waltz said. "There is a record number of generals."
"And the other piece— there is accountability," he added. "We have had several general officers who weren’t getting the job done, and admirals get fired and get replaced… That’s what the Pentagon needs."
"Couldn't be prouder"
"Whether it’s leaks, or not getting the job done, or failures in terms of procurement acquisition, now you have a leader that’s in charge," Waltz said. "And I couldn’t be prouder of Pete Hegseth."
Despite reports of dysfunction, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said several days before Waltz's interview that Trump still strongly supported Hegseth.
"Let me reiterate: The president stands strongly behind Secretary Hegseth and the change that he is bringing to the Pentagon, and the results that he's achieved thus far speak for themselves," Leavitt told reporters at a briefing last week, calling the negative reports a "smear campaign."
It has been a little difficult to tell whether things are going poorly in some of Trump's agencies, or whether it's just the press trying to make the administration look bad to dishearten voters and bring down approval ratings.
"Fake news"
Trump dismissed the so-called Signal leaks that included an editor from The Atlantic as "fake news."
“I don’t view Signal as important,” he told reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday as he flew to attend Pope Francis's funeral service.
Former U.S. Rep. George Santos (R-NY), who falsified most of his resume while running for a House seat in 2022, was sentenced on Friday to seven years in prison for wire fraud and identity theft.
He pleaded guilty in August 2024 to making fraudulent campaign donations in the names of 11 family members and reporting to the Federal Election Commission that he had loaned his campaign $500,000 when he only had $8,000 in his bank accounts.
Santos, who sobbed at Judge Joanna Seybert's sentence, has until July 25 to report to prison for the start of his sentence.
He also has to pay $373,000 in restitution and will have two years of probation after his time is served.
"Deepest apologies"
“I offer my deepest apologies,” Santos said. “I cannot rewrite the past, but I can control the road ahead.”
He admitted that he had “betrayed the confidence entrusted to me by constituents, donors, colleagues, and this court.”
Santos committed the fraud in order to qualify for aid from the national party, which helped him get elected to the swing seat.
In addition to the fraud, Santos's campaign also stole the identities and financial information of many of his donors and repeatedly charged their credit cards for more donations without authorization.
Apology not accepted
Judge Seybert did not buy his apology for one second. “Where’s the remorse? Where do I see it?” she asked.
She also called him “an arrogant fraudster talking out of both sides of his mouth."
“Mr. Santos, words have consequences,” she said. “You got elected with your words, most of which were lies.”
United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York John J. Durham said after the sentence: “From the moment he declared his candidacy for Congress, Santos leveraged his campaign for his own enrichment and financial benefit."
“Today, George Santos was finally held accountable for the mountain of lies, theft, and fraud he perpetrated," Durham stated. "For the defendant, it was judgment day, and for his many victims including campaign donors, political parties, government agencies, elected bodies, his own family members, and his constituents, it is justice.
“To Mr. Santos and other dishonest individuals of that ilk, who lie, steal identities and commit frauds to get elected to public office, this prosecution speaks to the truth that my Office is committed to aggressively rooting out public corruption and that public officials who criminally abuse our electoral process will end up in a federal prison," he added.
With national security-related leaks becoming a subject of significant concern in recent weeks, the Department of Justice is now taking steps to ensure a thorough investigation and potential legal consequences for those responsible.
As NPR reports, it was revealed on Friday that Attorney General Pam Bondi rescinded Biden-era protections for journalists who hide records or decline testimony related to individuals who are the subjects of criminal probes, a move sure to please President Donald Trump, who has routinely faced fallout from internal leaks.
Bondi reverses Garland rules
The change in policy was outlined in a memo from Bondi dated Friday, a communication in which the AG noted, “Safeguarding classified, privileged, and other sensitive information is essential to effective governance and law enforcement.”
Bondi continued, “Federal government employees intentionally leaking sensitive information to the media undermines the ability of the Department of Justice to uphold the rule of law, protect civil rights, and keep America safe.”
“This conduct is illegal and wrong, and it must stop,” Bondi emphatically declared.
The AG then stated, “Therefore, I have concluded that it is necessary to rescind [former Attorney General] Merrick Garland's policies precluding the Department of Justice from seeking records and compelling testimony from members of the news media in order to identify and punish the source of improper leaks.”
Notably, Bondi emphasized that “it is a bedrock principle that a free and independent press is vital to the functioning of our democracy” and assured that the “Department of Justice will defend that principle, despite the lack of independence of certain members of the legacy news media,” adding her recognition that “investigative techniques related to newsgathering are an extraordinary measure to be deployed as a last resort when essential to a successful investigation or prosecution.”
Revised regulatons, explained
As detailed in Bondi's memo, a host of adjustments to Biden-era policies are now poised for implementation, including a requirement that news media “must answer subpoenas” when they are authorized at the appropriate level at the DOJ.
“Specifically, the policy contemplates the use of subpoenas, court orders, and search warrants to compel production of information and testimony by and relating to members of the news media,” the AG noted.
With that said, Bondi added, “Members of the news media are presumptively entitled to advance notice of such investigative activities, subpoenas are to be narrowly drawn, and warrants must include protocols designed to limit the scope of intrusion into potentially protected materials or newsgathering activities.”
In assessing whether the aforementioned techniques are advisable in a given case, the AG will examine factors such as the existence of reasonable grounds to believe a crime has been committed and that the information at issue is crucial to the prosecution and whether prosecutors have made all reasonable efforts to secure the information at issue via alternative means.
Further, the AG will assess “whether, absent a threat to national security, the integrity of the investigation, or bodily harm, the government has pursued negotiations with the affected member of the news media.”
Media members watch and wait
Amid Friday's announcement, Bruce Brown, who leads the Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press underscored his belief that reporter protections are vital not just for members of the media but for the entire American public, saying, “Some of the most consequential reporting in U.S. history -- from Watergate to warrantless wiretapping after 9/11 -- was and continues to be made possible because reporters have been able to protect the identities of confidential sources and uncover and report stories that matter to people across the political spectrum.”
Then, striking a slightly more defiant tone, Brown added, “We'll wait to see what the policy looks like, but we know reporters will still do their jobs, and there is not shortage of legal support to back them up,” seemingly hinting at potential battles ahead with Bondi's DOJ.
Liberals across the country are up in arms over the arrest last week of a Wisconsin judge accused of obstructing the apprehension and arrest of an illegal immigrant.
However, the Trump FBI's decision to take Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan into custody has found at least some degree of support from a seemingly unlikely source, namely, the man who served as acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under former President Barack Obama, as Breitbart reports.
Judge's arrests unfolds
As Fox News explains, Dugan was arrested on Friday morning on allegations that she endeavored to hide an illegal immigrant who had been previously deported in order to thwart his arrest by ICE agents.
Federal officers from a handful of agencies attempted to make the arrest of Eduardo Flores-Ruiz of Mexico after a court appearance before Dugan related to battery charges.
It was then that Dugan told the officers to go to the chief judge's office, and when Flores-Ruiz's hearing concluded, she allegedly escorted both him and his lawyer out via a restricted exit away from the public part of the building where agents were waiting to apprehend him.
As a result of her conduct, Dugan was charged with obstruction of an official proceeding and also with concealing an individual to prevent discovery and arrest.
Not surprisingly, the arrest has spurred a host of heated reactions on the left, including from Wisconsin Democrat Gov. Tony Evers, who alleged that the Trump administration is employing “dangerous rhetoric to attack and attempt to undermine our judiciary at every level, including disobeying the highest court in the land.”
Obama-era official weighs in
However, not every Democrat was so quick to jump to Dugan's defense, as John Sandweg, who served as acting director of ICE during Obama's tenure, outlined his objections to the judge's conduct on Friday.
During an appearance on NewsNation's Cuomo, Sandweg, while expressing concern over the impact on ICE cases such as this may have, noted that Dugan's actions were far from appropriate.
Sandweg said of what unfolded in Wisconsin last week, “I would like to see the ICE agents just pick him up outside the courthouse or pick him up as he leaves the courthouse. During the Obama administration, as you know, during the Biden administration, we had a sensitive location policy.”
“We couldn't arrest people in a courthouse. I think there are good reasons for that,” he added.
With respect to Dugan specifically, Sandweg said, “I'm not here to defend this judge. … I think she overstepped here. I think there are other ways to lodge her objections.”
Resistance persists
As Fox News noted separately, Dugan's fellow Wisconsin judge, Monica Isham, threatened not to hold court as a means of protesting what occurred on Friday, saying, “I have no intention of allowing anyone to be taken out of my courtroom by ICE and sent to a concentration camp, especially without due process. … Should I start raising bail money?”
Unfortunately, despite all the liberal exhortations that “nobody is above the law,” articulated endlessly during the campaign of lawfare against Donald Trump, it in fact appears that the lion's share of Democrats do believe that those who sit on the bench are entitled to an exemption from that supposedly foundational principle.
Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD) made waves by making the insane claim that Trump administration officials should be arrested for "kidnapping."
During an appearance Friday on MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show,” Raskin argued that because rogue leftist judges are being arrested for aiding and abetting illegal immigrants, Trump officials should also be arrested for “interfering with a legal proceeding” or “kidnapping.”
Raskin's statements come after federal authorities arrested Judge Hannah Dugan in Wisconsin for aiding illegal immigrants avoid immigration officers who had a warrant for their arrest.
Raskin stated, "Now they’re arresting judges, and the first felony criminal charge brought against Judge Hannah Dugan in Wisconsin is interfering with a legal proceeding, which is essentially what they’ve been doing all along. What Judge Boasberg is about to hold them in criminal contempt for and has found that there is probable cause for criminal contempt is that they deliberately ignored and defied his order not to take off in those airplanes headed for El Salvador and not turning the airplanes around."
On the face of it, this statement makes no sense, but it is very likely that Democrats are going to press this issue heavily as they attempt to thwart President Donald Trump's bold immigration agenda.
Absurd Charges
Raskin's assertion that Trump officials are guilty of "interfering with a legal proceeding” or “kidnapping" is entirely baseless and draws from the doomed movement to hold Trump officials in contempt of court for deporting illegal immigrants.
Raskin claimed in his interview with Maddow that, "They have been disobeying federal court orders systematically. They have incurred criminal contempt findings in the courtroom of Judge Boasberg, a conservative Republican, a judge. They have been demanding the impeachment of judges who rule against the lawlessness of the Trump administration."
For the record, Judge Boasberg was appointed by former President Barack Obama, which immediately throws Raskin's assertion that he is a conservative into a dubious light.
Furthermore, Judge Boasberg's attempts to hold Trump officials in contempt of court for failing to abide by an order they could never uphold show that he is an ideological opponent of the conservative movement.
Judge Boasberg attempted to order flights to El Salvador carrying violent illegal immigrants to turn around, but this was simply impossible. His attempt to push contempt of court charges was quickly shut down by a higher court.
Raskin ignored this higher order in arguing that the Trump administration should be held in criminal contempt. It's no surprise to see a Democrat ignoring evidence in order to push an absurd narrative against the Trump administration.
Crushing Rogue Judges
Trump's immigration agenda and deportation of violent illegal immigrants are massively popular with regular Americans, but that hasn't stopped activist judges from stonewalling and slowing down Trump's agenda at every turn.
So far, two judges have been arrested for openly thwarting a legal arrest of illegal immigrants and have already been canonized by the left for their valiant efforts in protecting illegal immigrants, who often are a threat to the American people.
Thankfully, the Trump administration is working to hold those rogue judges accountable, and the Supreme Court will likely have a large role to play in reining in these activist judges who care more about illegal immigrants than the safety of the American people.
Former President Donald Trump openly expressed doubt about Russian President Vladimir Putin's desire for peace in Ukraine and called out the recent escalation in hostilities involving a missile strike on Kyiv, Fox News reported.In a critical message on Truth Social, Trump highlighted the continued violence, meeting with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy amidst faltering peace talks.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has been a significant point of concern for Trump, especially following the latest attacks by Russia on Kyiv. On Thursday, 12 people lost their lives, and at least 90 were injured, among them children, during a missile attack on the capital city. Trump's statements on social media reflect mounting frustration over what he perceives as unnecessary aggression.
Trump and Zelenskyy's Meeting in Vatican City
On Saturday, Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the Vatican. This face-to-face interaction marked their first encounter since a previous spat in February. The meeting was described by White House Communications Director Steven Cheung as "a very productive discussion." During their talks, Trump proposed alternate strategies, such as enhanced economic sanctions, to handle the ongoing crisis.
Despite negotiations to resolve the conflict, a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine remains out of reach. Trump's skepticism regarding Putin's intentions surfaced following another series of Russian strikes. He questioned if Putin's approach involved merely drawing out negotiations rather than seeking a genuine resolution.
Trump’s Criticism of the Current Administration
On Thursday, Trump urged Putin to halt strikes on Kyiv, describing the violence as poorly timed and unnecessary. He suggested that the cost, in terms of human lives, was too high, with 5,000 soldiers dying weekly. Trump's critique extended to President Joe Biden's handling of the conflict, which he labeled "Sleepy Joe Biden’s War" and asserted it was avoidable under his administration. He chastised the actions of the Obama-Biden administration, blaming them for the current situation.
Special Envoy Steve Witkoff played a role in attempts to broker peace. Witkoff traveled to Moscow for the fourth occasion shortly after the missile attacks on Kyiv to engage in diplomatic discussions.
Trump's Vision for Post-Conflict Relations
Trump has previously expressed optimism about finding a resolution, particularly before Easter, but stressed that the conflict's enormity, with casualties surpassing those in World War II, continues to be daunting. He maintains optimism that once peace is achieved, Russia and Ukraine could undertake lucrative business ventures with the United States. His proclamation that he could end the war within a day of taking office underscores both his self-confidence and dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs.
Trump’s desire for a swift resolution is evident, but the response from Putin's administration remains elusive. His concern that Putin might be stalling was voiced clearly when he mentioned possible solutions involving financial sanctions.
Potential Solutions Sought by Trump
Trump's social media statements included suggestions for alternative means to approach the conflict. He spoke about leveraging economic sanctions, either through banking measures or secondary sanctions, to deter continued aggression by Russia. These potential solutions illustrate his interest in finding actionable measures to end the war.
His critique of the Russian missile attacks, specifically the recent strikes on civilian areas, points to a broader view that the military engagement is not only catastrophic but also avoidable. Trump’s messages were directed at Putin, urging the cessation of hostilities and implying that different methods need to be employed.
Hope for peace, once a sentiment expressed by Trump in previous months, is now tinged with criticism and weariness as the conflict shows no signs of a swift conclusion. Trump’s interactions with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy and various envoys involved in peace talks highlight his continued involvement in seeking solutions.
Analyzing the Long-Term Impact
Trump's remarks about a potential post-conflict economic collaboration suggest his forward-looking strategy emphasizing restoration and growth following peace. While immediate focus remains on conflict resolution, the potential for future ties between the nations is a significant aspect of Trump's perspective.
The recent interactions between world leaders and diplomatic envoys underscore the complexity of the ongoing conflict and the challenges in achieving lasting peace. For now, amidst mixed signals from diplomatic efforts and the continuing violence, Trump continues to voice his opinions and plans for a future without war.
On Friday, President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump flew to Rome to attend the funeral of Pope Francis, who passed away last week due to health complications.
According to Newsmax, it was also Melania Trump's 55th birthday, and President Donald Trump admitted that he was too busy to buy her a gift. Instead, he treated her to a fancy dinner aboard Air Force One.
The president showed some humility and admitted that the idea of a romantic dinner aboard an airplane might not be everyone's idea of the perfect birthday date, but assured reporters that it was enjoyable for both him and his wife.
Because of the busy flight schedule that included traveling back and forth to Italy for the funeral, the president said his wife was treated to a "working birthday" to celebrate another trip around the sun for the former supermodel.
What did he say?
President Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that between the tariff deals happening, the upcoming marking of his 100th day in office for his second term, and dealing with Ukraine, Iran and Gaza, celebrating her birthday in a traditional manner wasn't realistic.
"I haven't had time to buy presents, it's been pretty busy," Trump admitted, saying Melania had to be fine with a "working birthday" instead.
Newsmax noted:
When asked if he would be taking Melania to dinner to mark her birthday, he replied, "I'm taking her for dinner on the Boeing -- I'm taking her for dinner on Air Force One."
Trump then joked that he would send his wife back into the "lion's den" to talk to reporters herself.
Even with the working birthday aboard the presidential airplane, it was better than last year, as the two spent her birthday apart as he mostly stayed in New York battling several cases against him while Melania stayed in Florida at Mar-a-Lago.
At the time of her birthday last year, Trump told reporters, “It’d be nice to be with her, but I’m at a courthouse for a rigged trial."
While Melania Trump has largely stayed out of the public spotlight for her husband's second term, the two have made a handful of joint appearances together in recent months.
Melania responds
The first lady thanked her supporters for the birthday wishes in an X post.
"Thank you all for the heartfelt birthday wishes. I had the honor of attending Pope Francis' funeral, on this day, where I prayed for the healing of those who are suffering and for peace in the world," she wrote.
Thank you all for the heartfelt birthday wishes.
I had the honor of attending Pope Francis' funeral, on this day, where I prayed for the healing of those who are suffering and for peace in the world. pic.twitter.com/wOiSsxQI1t
"Happy Birthday to our beautiful First Lady!! I hope you had a special day and am sending much love and many blessings to you and your family!" one X user wrote.
Patriot News Alerts delivers timely news and analysis on U.S. politics, government, and current events, helping readers stay informed with clear reporting and principled commentary.
