President Donald Trump has successfully brokered an "economic exchange" deal with Qatar worth $1.2 trillion, Breitbart reported. Trump signed several agreements in Doha with Qatar's Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani on Wednesday.
The two nations have had a fraught relationship, including during Trump's first term. However, Trump was ready to make a deal this week during a Middle East trip that also included a stop in Saudi Arabia.
The White House touted the recent agreement in a post to X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday. "THE TRUMP EFFECT. $1,200,000,000,000. President Donald J. Trump Secures Historic $1.2 Trillion Economic Commitment in Qatar," the post said with an accompanying photo of the historic signing.
THE TRUMP EFFECTđź’°
$1,200,000,000,000President Donald J. Trump Secures Historic $1.2 Trillion Economic Commitment in Qatar pic.twitter.com/VBjQzrUyF5
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) May 14, 2025
The agreement includes a boon for several American companies totaling at least $243.5 billion. It includes a contract for Qatar Airways to purchase "210 American-made Boeing 787 Dreamliner and 777X aircraft powered by GE Aerospace engines" from Boeing and GE Aerospace, totaling $96 billion.
Not only is this a good deal, but it's also record-breaking for the Chicago-based aircraft manufacturer. "This is Boeing’s largest-ever widebody order and largest-ever 787 order," the White House noted.
"This historic agreement will support 154,000 U.S. jobs annually, totaling over 1 million jobs in the United States during the course of production and delivery of this deal," the White House explained. The agreement also included $97 billion to the Virginia-based Parsons Corporation, a defense, intelligence, and engineering firm.
In a joint venture with Al Rabban Capital and Quantinuum, they have agreed "to invest up to $1 billion in state-of-the-art quantum technologies and workforce development in the United States." In addition, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed onto a joint defense agreement.
Qatar will purchase $1 billion in anti-drone technology from Raytheon and another $2 billion for General Atomics' MQ-9B "remotely operated aircraft." Despite the good news, not everyone was happy with all of the winning.
Trump is unique among modern American leaders in that he seems eager to make deals rather than drop bombs. Just this week, Trump brokered a $142 billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia.
Still, even some in his own party are upset with how he's handled relations with Qatar in light of its previous friendliness to terrorists. "Qatar is not, in my opinion, a great ally," Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) said Tuesday to reporters, according to Fox News.
"I mean, they support Hamas. So what I'm worried about is the safety of the president," Scott added.
Despite Scott's concerns, the nation has become more friendly to the U.S. and its allies in recent years. In fact, Qatar has attempted to negotiate a peace deal and hostage exchange in the war between Israel and Hamas.
Trump is a gifted businessman and is applying those skills to furthering America's interests. This new deal with Qatar represents another profound move towards friendly relations through an innovative strategy, regardless of what critics say.
Bolivian presidential election, President Luis Arce, who took office in 2020, took steps to avoid a humiliating loss, and stepped away from the election.
Bolivia's governing party is in turmoil as Arce and former President Evo Morales fight for leadership of their leftist bloc. The decision was made in a late-night televised address, as Breitbart News reported.
“I will not be a factor in dividing the popular vote,” Arce said in his speech, warning that a fragmented base would give Bolivia’s right-wing and centrist parties a shot at power after nearly two decades of socialist rule.
“Much less will I facilitate the realization of a fascist right-wing project ... that seeks to destroy the productive social economic model.”
The long-running animosity between Arce and Morales has been hastening an already-in-the-works economic disaster, which has MAS's working-class base of support in a frenzy.
After claiming one of the lowest inflation rates in the region, Bolivia is now battling with one of the highest, and the country has gone from exporting natural gas to importing fuel.
Bolivian pesos are now worth half as much as they are on the official exchange rate. The nation has come to a standstill due to fuel scarcity and the fact that the nation has run out of money in the central bank.
Even though Morales was part of the foundation of many of the issues the nation faces today, the majority of voters hold Arce responsible for the economic mayhem.
Morales, along with Senate President Andronico RodrĂguez, are both on the left, and have been gaining in the polls on the president.
Morales felt he had no choice but to secede from the MAS once Arce took control, so he formed his own party to run for office.
The politically ambitious 36-year-old RodrĂguez is from Morales' rural coca-growing area and is thus far undecided about joining the MAS ticket.
Arce's resignation on Tuesday was allegedly seen as a new chapter in his growing animosity toward Morales, whose revived campaign platform appeals to the public looking for ways to obtain fuel and investment and declining poverty rates.
“I challenge former President Evo Morales not to insist on running,” Arce said, “because constitutionally he cannot do so and because the dispersion and fragmentation of the vote would favor the right.”
Six years after his attempt for an unlawful fourth term sparked widespread protests and self-exile in response to pressure from the military, Bolivia's first Indigenous president, Evo Morales, encounters multiple challenges on his path back to his nation's highest office.
A Nevada man was sentenced to nearly four years in prison for threatening to kill U.S. senators in a series of profane rants.
John Anthony Miller, 44, received 46 months in prison and three years of supervised release for making violent anti-Semitic threats to Democratic Senator Jackie Rosen (NV) and others. The man pleaded guilty to one count of threatening a federal official and two counts of influencing, impeding, or retaliating against a federal official by threatening a family member.
Between October 11, 2023, and October 25, 2023, Miller left several voicemails for two senators, including Rosen.
In some of those messages, he called Rosen, who is Jewish, "subhuman" and threatened to "finish what Hitler started."Â Miller also aired grievances about the treatment of Palestinians in the West Bank by Israeli settlers.
The threats came days after Hamas' deadly assault on Israel on October 7, 2023.
"You f****** piece of s*** un-human, subhuman, you're vermin, b****, and we're gonna finish what Hitler started," he said in one of the messages.
"You're gonna burn in f****** hell for your f****** crimes ... You're gonna burn in hell, b****, and me and Jesus are gonna piss on you b****," he said in another.
On October 18, 2023, Miller appeared at the Lloyd D. George Courthouse in Las Vegas and said he was there to see Rosen. A security guard asked to have a closer look at his ID card, but Miller refused. After he was barred entry, he stormed out of the building and began shouting profanities, like "kill every last Israeli terror-*******rist" while walking down Las Vegas Boulevard.
Miller also threatened the families of two U.S. senators on October 24 and October 25.
Miller's lawyer calling the sentence "harsh" and said his client was addicted to meth.
"I felt the sentence was a little harsh for a nonviolent offender with a minimal criminal record, but we respect the court’s ruling and look forward to John moving forward and dealing with his addiction,” Jess Marchese, the lawyer, said to the AP.
The feds say the sentence sends a strong message about intimidating public officials.
"Violent threats against any individual are unacceptable," said Spencer Evans, Special Agent in Charge for the FBI Las Vegas Division. "But when they are directed at elected officials and their family members, threats have the potential to impact democracy itself by silencing those chosen to represent the American People."
President Trump said there is "something wrong" with Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) after he threatened to stonewall Justice Department nominees over Trump's acceptance of a free luxury jet from Qatar.
The White House has noted that the opulent gift is being donated to the Department of Defense and not Trump personally, although it would be transferred to Trump's presidential library at the end of his term.
As Trump traveled to Qatar for the second stop on his Middle East tour this week, which also brought him to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, he was asked about Schumer's threats to block Justice Department nominees.
Trump remarked that Schumer, who is Jewish, has "become a Palestinian" and suggested the longtime senator from Trump's home state of New York had "something wrong" with him.
"Schumer is Schumer," Trump said. "You know, he's become a Palestinian. Something wrong with him? I don't know, I've known him a long time and there's something wrong. He's lost his confidence, totally. And there's something wrong with him. I don't know what it is with Schumer."
Trump's remark that Schumer has "lost his confidence" would be seconded by many Democrats who say the senator has been timid about stopping Trump's sweeping agenda.
Schumer seized an opportunity to quiet his critics by pouncing at Trump over his "corrupt" foreign gift.
"News of the Qatari government gifting Donald Trump a $400 million private jet to use as Air Force One is so corrupt that even Putin would give a double take. This is not just naked corruption, it is also a grave national security threat," Schumer said on the Senate floor Tuesday.
Trump has said he would be foolish not to accept the Boeing 747 jet, estimated to be worth $400 million, while Boeing works on replacing Air Force One. The current fleet is over 30 years old, and Trump has complained about the slow pace of Boeing's progress.
"We're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One," Trump said Monday morning. "You know, we have an Air Force One that's 40 years old. And if you take a look at that, compared to the new plane of the equivalent, you know, stature at the time, it's not even the same ballgame."
While opposition to Qatar's gift has come mostly from Democrats, Republicans in Congress have also expressed caution about the arrangement. Critics have speculated that Qatar is trying to buy influence, while some have raised concerns about possible espionage.
Trump traveled to the Gulf states this week to secure investments in the U.S. and promote his vision for peace and stability in the Middle East. It was his first major foreign trip since returning to the White House.
The president was lavishly entertained by his oil-rich Arab hosts, with a parade of camels greeting his motorcade in Qatar after he touched down. "We appreciate those camels," Trump said.
While in Qatar, Trump announced that Boeing had secured a record order of 210 jets from Qatar Airways for $96 billion. The White House estimates the sale will generate 154,000 jobs in the U.S. annually.
President Trump's pick for Surgeon General endorsed controversial psychedelic therapy in her book, urging others to consider magic mushrooms for personal healing.
A proponent of alternative medicine, Casey Means is a leading influence in the "Make America Healthy Again" movement led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
In her 2024 book Good Energy, Casey Means recounted a transformative experience with psilocybin, or magic mushrooms.
“If you feel called, I also encourage you to explore intentional, guided psilocybin therapy,” she wrote. “Strong scientific evidence suggests that this psychedelic therapy can be one of the most meaningful experiences of life for some people, as they have been for me.”
Psilocybin is illegal under federal law, although some Democratic states and cities have taken steps to legalize it. Some cities in Oregon walked back the trend in November, voting to ban the Schedule 1 drug, which has "no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse," according to the federal government.
Despite its serious health risks, some claim psilocybin has legitimate benefits when used in a guided setting. Some veterans have credited the drug with healing their PTSD.
In her book on metabolic health, co-written with her brother Calley, Casey Means refers to psychedelics as "plant medicine" with an almost magical power. She described psilocybin as a "doorway to a different reality that is free from the limiting beliefs of my ego, feelings, and personal history."
"I felt myself as part of an infinite and unbroken series of cosmic nesting dolls of millions of mothers and babies before me from the beginning of life," she wrote.
Means also credited psychedelics with helping her "create space to find love at 35" in her newsletter.
The Stanford graduate dropped out of her medical residency after becoming disillusioned with the health care industry, going on to become a prominent wellness influencer. She became widely known after an appearance on Tucker Carlson's show with her brother Calley Means.
Calley also supports psilocybin, describing his first trip as "the single most meaningful experience of my life," and he invests in companies that are researching psychedelics. He is working as an adviser to Kennedy, who runs the Health and Human Services Department.
Trump withdrew his initial pick for surgeon general, former Fox News medical contributor Janette Nesheiwat, after her resume fell under scrutiny and some Trump supporters criticized her favorable comments about the COVID-19 vaccine.
Means has also faced backlash from some "MAHA" supporters who say she isn't critical enough of vaccines, while others have cited her inactive medical license as a concern. Trump, after nominating her, said he does not know Means personally but hired her on Kennedy's advice.
Her views on psychedelic therapy are likely to come up during her Senate confirmation hearing, which has not been scheduled.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Ex-CIA chief John Brennan, evidence now shows, suppressed intelligence that Americans should have been given, wildly claimed there was no spying on the 2016 Donald Trump campaign, has been known to unleash untruths, and even was accused by a counter-terrorism expert of treason.
Now, he's gone ballistic over the routine housecleaning decisions being made by President Donald Trump's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard.
It's all from his outrage that she is not keeping in place the intelligence officers who worked for Joe Biden.
Gabbard, in fact, recently announced the firings of Mike Collins, who was on the National Intelligence Council, and Maria Langan-Riekhof, his deputy.
According to reports, both have been named by whistleblowers as having political biases, acting on them, and undermining President Trump.
One Daily Fetched report identified them as "Deep State" operatives. And Fox News had reported they were "radically" in opposition to President Trump and his actions.
Brennan commented on the staff changes in an interview in which he was "visibly angry."
Gabbard's stated goals have been to prevent the politicization of intelligence, which has happened under Barack Obama and Biden.
For example, ex-CIA Director Michael Morrell was accused of helping organization a letter signed by dozens of intel operatives that claimed the scandal-proving laptop computer abandoned by Hunter Biden at a repair shop had "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation."
Actually, the laptop provided documentation of real scandals involving the Biden family.
And officials knew when they signed the letter that the evidence was factual.
Collins had been accused by whistleblowers of deliberately undermining Trump, and Langan-Riekhof was known for her advocacy for the now-discredited DEI agenda.
On MSNBC, Brennan unleashed his rage:
"This whole thing just makes me livid."
A commentary by David Harsanyi, in fact, discussed the Durham report that reviewed the FBI's political scheme to attack Trump over the "Russia" claims.
The column explained, "The just-released Durham report confirmed that the FBI not only failed to corroborate the Steele dossier, Hillary Clinton's oppo-doc against former President Donald Trump, but it regularly ignored existing, sometimes dispositive, evidence to keep the investigation alive. Some officials were credulous. Others were devious. But no one 'stole' our democracy – other than perhaps intelligence officials and the journalists who helped feed the collective hysteria over Russia.
"John Brennan, Hamas-loving authoritarian and partisan propagandist, almost surely knew it was a con from the start. Yet he spent four years on television sounding like a deranged subreddit commenter. Even after privately admitting he knew there was no collusion, Brennan kept lying and using his credentials to mislead the public."
John Durham, himself, concluded after a years-long investigation of the origins of the FBI war against Trump and the Trump campaign, "CIA Director John Brennan and Deputy Director David Cohen were interviewed by the Office and were asked about their knowledge of any actual evidence of members of the Trump campaign conspiring or colluding with Russian officials. When Brennan was provided with an overview of the origins of the Attorney General's Review after Special Counsel Mueller finding a lack of evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian authorities, Brennan offered that 'they found no conspiracy.'"
But Brennan later went on television to insist that he "suspected there was more" to collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian President Vladimir Putin than [special counsel Robert] Mueller had let on."
The U.S. Supreme Court is currently examining a pivotal case that challenges President Donald Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship. At the heart of this legal battle is the issue of whether lower courts overreached when they issued nationwide injunctions to block Trump's policy.
With a decision pending, the outcome of the case could redefine the division of power between the judicial and executive branches.
The legal debate began when three federal judges from Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington state halted the enforcement of Trump's executive order. The injunctions from these judges, described as "universal," directly countered the president's attempt to alter the longstanding tradition of granting citizenship to those born on U.S. soil. Trump's administration swiftly asked the Supreme Court to limit the authority of lower courts in issuing such broad rulings.
The issue at hand is the scope of judicial power versus presidential authority. The central question is whether these nationwide injunctions represent an overreach of authority by the lower courts. A decision by the Supreme Court to restrict such injunctions could dramatically alter how executive orders are challenged in the future.
This case is set against a backdrop of significant legal pushback against the second term of President Trump's administrative actions. His executive orders have faced numerous legal challenges, reflecting a struggle over executive power inherent in the U.S. government’s system of checks and balances.
The nation’s highest court, which currently consists of a 6-3 conservative majority, is weighing these considerations carefully. A ruling in favor of Trump's administration could lead to a reassessment of the use of nationwide injunctions by federal judges across the country.
Beyond judicial figures, Trump's birthright citizenship has encountered opposition from over 22 U.S. states and immigrant’ rights organizations. These entities argue that the principle of birthright citizenship, which grants citizenship to anyone born within the U.S. boundaries, is both a historical precedent and a constitutional right needing protection.
The legal challenges, so far, have prevented Trump’s order from being enacted. No court to date has affirmed the legality of Trump’s directive. However, the current deliberations by the Supreme Court have the potential to change this dynamic dramatically.
In the current proceedings, critics of the president’s stance are wary of what they see as an attempt to expand executive power. Mark Zaid's remarks capture this sentiment, highlighting concerns that the administration is moving to bolster the executive branch at the expense of the legislative and judicial branches.
The Supreme Court's decision will likely impact how future presidents utilize executive orders. It raises questions about the balance of power within the federal government, as well as the future of immigration policy in the U.S.
Moreover, the case is indicative of the broader political landscape. It underscores divisions in the U.S. on issues such as immigration and executive governance. The high stakes mean that both sides are preparing for outcomes that could affect policymaking for years to come.
The attention to the Supreme Court's ruling goes beyond the immediate parties involved. It also reflects the broader question of the judicial system’s role in regulating policies that stem from the executive branch. This ongoing debate has significant implications for how judicial authorities exercise their oversight functions.
Cases such as this one often set precedents that guide future judicial and executive interactions. If the Supreme Court sides with Trump, it could encourage a reevaluation of the use of national injunctions, affecting legal mechanisms that respond to executive actions.
The implications for immigrants and their potential citizenship rights are significant. Proposed changes to birthright citizenship have sparked prominent discussions about American identity and constitutional rights.
As stakeholders and observers await a decision, the debate emphasizes the intricate dynamics between state power and individual rights. The conclusion reached by the Supreme Court will resonate beyond this immediate case, shaping the framework of U.S. legal and political landscapes.
In sum, the Supreme Court’s judgment on Trump’s executive order to alter birthright citizenship stands as a landmark decision for America's legal and political future. As the nation waits in anticipation, the ripple effects of this case will undoubtedly influence not just current courtroom strategies but also how future policies are crafted and contested.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Job losses happen all up and down the scale of income levels in America.
And unemployment compensation is intended to make sure that people in dire situations have a resource to pay for the basics, like groceries. It certainly isn't intended to replace an income.
Of course, those with higher incomes are more likely to have savings accounts, homes that are paid off, cars without car loans, things like that.
And those circumstances are triggering a U.S. senator to plan changes that will be coming.
Because she found that the Joe Biden administration paid $271 million in unemployment compensation during just two years – to millionaires!
A report at the Federalist explains, "Good news for millionaires and billionaires: They are currently eligible for unemployment benefits, whether they need it or not. That has been true since 1964 when the Department of Labor determined unemployment is for all eligible workers no matter their income level"
That precedent resulted in Biden, in 2022, giving unemployment checks to 5,773 people earning $1 million or more.
About $58 million went to "out-of-work millionaires," an average of about $10,000, the Federalist confirmed.
"In 2021, a COVID quarantine year with extra dough baked into unemployment, 14,972 people earning $1 million or more received unemployment compensation. The Biden administration spent nearly $214 million keeping millionaires fed, paying an average of $14,200 each," the report said.
The numbers come from a Congressional Research Service document prepared for Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, the Senate DOGE Caucus chair, who plans to shake things up.
"Our nation's safety net shouldn't be strained by subsidizing the lifestyles of the self-sufficient," Ernst explained, the report said. "Able-bodied millionaires shouldn't expect handouts paid for by overtaxed and overworked Americans. The freebies for free-loading fat cats are over."
Her plan is the "'Ending Unemployment Payments to Jobless Millionaires Act of 2025," which would bar federal cash being used for unemployment compensation for an individual whose wages during their base period are equal to or exceed $1 million
The CRS numbers were based on tax returns of people who "earned over $1 million and also received unemployment," the Federalist said.
José "Pepe" Mujica, the former Uruguayan president renowned for his simplistic lifestyle and impactful leadership, has passed away at the age of 89, Yahoo News reported.
Mujica's passing has prompted an outpouring of condolences from Latin American leaders for his dedication to progress and equality.
José Mujica, famously known as "Pepe," was a prominent figure in Uruguayan politics, having served as the nation's president from 2010 to 2015. However, his journey began long before his presidency. In the 1960s, Mujica was a founding member of the Tupamaros National Liberation Movement, a group dedicated to Marxist revolutionary tactics.
His activities with the movement led to his imprisonment, spending almost 15 years behind bars, often in solitary confinement. Mujica endured significant challenges during this time, including being shot multiple times.
Released in an amnesty in 1985, Mujica transitioned from a revolutionary background to a political pathway. His first significant political role was election to the Uruguayan parliament in 1994, aligning with the Broad Front coalition. Mujica’s deep connection to the land and life as a farmer helped forge his later political identity as a politician attuned to the common people. After a successful stint, including a notable tenure as agricultural minister starting in 2005, his path eventually led to his presidency.
During his presidency, Mujica was known for his commitment to ordinary living, shunning lavish residences for a modest tin-roofed house and a 1987 Volkswagen Beetle.
His administration was marked by progressive social policies that garnered attention worldwide. Uruguay, under his leadership, was a pioneer in reforming marijuana regulations, establishing the country as the first to fully legalize and control the drug’s production and sale. Furthermore, significant strides were made in social equality, with Uruguay being the second Latin American nation to permit same-sex marriages and the decriminalization of abortion.
Leftist leaders across Latin America have lauded Mujica’s contributions following his death. Current Uruguayan President Yamandú Orsi expressed profound grief and remarked, “We will miss you greatly, dear old man. Thank you for everything you gave us and for your profound love for your people.”
Mexican politician Claudia Sheinbaum praised Mujica as “an example for Latin America and the entire world,” while Chilean President Gabriel Boric reflected on how Mujica inspired hope for better governance. Bernardo Arévalo, president of Guatemala, added tribute by highlighting that Mujica’s work remained a beacon of hope and direction.
Despite the notable accomplishments of his administration, Mujica’s leadership faced criticism, particularly regarding crime rates and fiscal concerns. The opposition criticized his handling of these issues, which remained contentious even as his approval ratings remained relatively high. Mujica departed from his role as president in 2015 with commendable public support, leaving office with a notable 60% approval rating. Nonetheless, constitutional mandates prevented his immediate reelection.
Mujica’s personal life also bore witness to his profound alliances and commitments. In 2005, he married LucĂa Topolansky, a fellow former guerrilla fighter who later became a distinguished political figure herself.
In his later years, Mujica faced significant health issues. Spring of last year brought a diagnosis of esophageal cancer, which subsequently spread to his liver, heavily impacting his well-being. Despite these struggles, his impact and legacy continued to resonate strongly across his country and beyond.
José Mujica’s life story stands as a powerful testament to perseverance, transformation, and the kind of leadership that chooses modesty and social progress over opulence. His tenure as president and his remarkable journey from revolutionary to respected statesman have left a lasting impact not just in Uruguay but across the world stage.
Doctors found a small nodule in Joe Biden's prostate during a routine exam, but it's too early to know if it is something serious or not.
"In a routine physical exam a small nodule was found in the prostate which necessitated further evaluation," a spokesperson told ABC News.
The report adds to the recent surge of media interest in Biden's health, much of which is being fueled by books written by liberal journalists.
Concerns about Biden's health were largely ignored during his presidency by mainstream reporters until his disastrous performance in a presidential debate last June.
Prior to the debate, Biden-friendly media mostly echoed the White House's talking points, which downplayed Biden's sharp decline despite his stiff gait, garbled speech, and balance issues that led to numerous falls.
Biden aides privately admitted that he might need a wheelchair if re-elected to a second term, according to a new book co-written by CNN's Jake Tapper.
"Biden's physical deterioration -- most apparent in his halting walk -- had become so severe that there were internal discussions about putting the president in a wheelchair, but they couldn't do so until after the election," an excerpt from the book, Original Sin, says.
Biden's doctor, Kevin O'Connor, had warned his aides that a wheelchair might be needed if he had a bad fall, according to the book. O'Connor publicly certified that Biden was fit to serve, despite never testing his cognitive capacity.
O'Connor continued to describe Biden's mental fitness as "excellent" even after his infamous debate performance last summer.
Another excerpt from Tapper's book claims that Biden did not recognize actor George Clooney at a 2024 fundraiser.
In the wake of Biden's debate meltdown, Clooney wrote an op-ed urging Biden to end his re-election campaign as Democrats suddenly turned on him.
Biden has been making an effort to salvage his tarnished legacy with a comeback media tour, angering Democrats who still blame him for President Trump's historic return to the White House.
The Biden family continues to jealously defend Biden against his former media allies-turned-critics. Biden and his wife Jill maintained that his health is just fine during a recent interview on The View.
"One of the things I think is that the people who wrote those books were not in the White House with us. And they didn't see how hard Joe worked every single day," Jill Biden said.