Illinois Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker blamed Charlie Kirk's assassination on President Donald Trump's "rhetoric" and claimed that he was responsible for "fomenting" political violence, Breitbart reported. The 31-year-old conservative star was gunned down during an appearance at a Utah college on Wednesday.
America was left reeling after Kirk was apparently shot in the neck by a sniper's bullet and later pronounced dead. The graphic video made the rounds on social media as many in the conservative movement expressed their deep sorrow and sympathies for Kirk's wife and children.
As of Thursday, authorities were still unsure of the motive and had not taken anyone into custody. Nevertheless, many on the left began their ghoulish business of celebrating the murder, including Pritzker.
He was asked for his remarks about Kirk's death while speaking to reporters, and Pritzker took the opportunity to take a shot at the president, even though it was unclear who the shooter was and what the motive might be. The Illinois Democrats are just one of many who took the opportunity of Kirk's death to smear Republicans.
Pritzker's answer to a reporter's question about Kirk's death was absolutely disgraceful. The governor started with a short word of condolence for Kirk's family before launching into his reprehensible rhetoric. "Charlie Kirk has become a target for somebody," Prtizker said.
"I don’t know whether it’s political violence, because I don’t know who did it. But I will say that political violence, unfortunately, has been ratcheting up in this country," Prtizker remarked.
"We saw the shootings, the killings in Minnesota. We’ve seen other political violence occur in other states. And I would just say it’s gotta stop," Pritzker said, referring to the murder of Minnesota’s Democratic House Speaker, Rep. Melissa Hortman, and her husband, earlier this year.
"And I think there are people who are fomenting it in this country. I think the president’s rhetoric often foments it," Pritzker claimed. He then went on to repeat the narrative about the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. "We’ve seen the January 6th rioters who clearly have tripped a new era of political violence," he claimed, though the only person killed in that attack was an unarmed woman shot by a Capitol Police officer.
JB Pritzker uses the assassination of Charlie Kirk to blame President Trump and talk about J6: "Political violence has been ratcheting up in this country. I think the president's rhetoric often foments it."
Despicable. pic.twitter.com/fkHanokers
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) September 11, 2025
Pritzker was quick to blame Trump for Kirk's killing, but the governor has actively encouraged the people of his state to resist federal and National Guard troops sent in to clean up the crime in Chicago. "To any federal official who would come to Chicago and try to incite my people into violence as a pretext for something darker and more dangerous, we are watching, and we are taking names," Pritzker said late last month.
This was deliberately misleading about the reason for their presence, namely, stopping the hundreds of murders that happen in the Windy City every year. He also made a veiled threat on social media, promising, "If you hurt my people, nothing will stop me — not time or political circumstance — from making sure you face justice…"
Still, Pritzker wasn't the only leftist to pin the murder of a conservative pundit on Republicans. As the New York Post reported, MSNBC's Matthew Dowd blamed Kirk after previously speculating that it could have been a bullet from a "supporter shooting their gun off in celebration," the author and political analyst said on air as the tragedy unfolded.
"You can’t stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and then not expect awful actions to take place. That’s the unfortunate environment we’re in," Dowd claimed.
Kirk's assassination was one of the most harrowing tragedies to befall a political figure in recent times. While decent people mourn the loss of a man who was a husband, father, and beloved public figure, the dregs of society on the left took the opportunity of Kirk's death to debase him and themselves.
Barron Trump is moving back into the White House, bringing him closer to his mother and father.
The first son spent his freshman year of college in New York, where he took classes at NYU's Greenwich Village campus. He will resume his studies at the university's academic center in Washington, D.C, the New York Post reported.
Barron was most recently living at Trump Tower in Manhattan, where he grew up. He commuted from there to NYU's Stern School of Business, often grabbing the attention of journalists as he came and went.
The president's son had little chance of blending in, and he was said to lead a secluded life, interacting with friends mostly online - a precaution for his safety.
Barron was nowhere in sight when classes resumed last week, fueling speculation about his whereabouts.
NYU's D.C. campus has just 120 students, so it is likely that Barron will be even more noticeable than he was in New York.
The White House will look a little different than it did when Barron was living there during his father's first term. President Trump recently renovated the Rose Garden, and there are plans to complete a grand ballroom before his term is up.
When Barron started college in New York last fall, it was not yet clear that his father would be returning to Washington, D.C.
"It was his [Barron's] decision to come here that he wants to be in New York and study in New York and live in his home, and I respect that," Melania told Fox News last fall.
"I'm very proud of what he grew up to," Melania continued. "His strength. His intelligence. His knowledge, his kindness. It's admirable."
Barron is known to be close with his family, and his mother is very protective of him. She has taken on a greater role within the White House, pushing anti-revenge porn legislation into law and personally appealing to Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine.
While her son remains an elusive figure, the 19-year-old college sophomore is said to be a fledgling businessman - who many say has a striking resemblance to his father.
Barron reportedly spent his summer setting up deals and enjoying time with his family.
“Barron has been actively working on his own financial interests and has spent time with others who he is involved with in that area,” a source told People.
President Donald Trump’s appointee for the Federal Reserve Board of Governors was recently approved by a Senate committee, in what is seen as a big win for the White House.
White House economic adviser Dr. Stephen Miran was confirmed by the Senate Banking Committee along partisan lines in a 13-11 vote, with all Democrats voting against the confirmation, as Breitbart News reported.
Due to the political makeup of the full Senate, it is expected that the Trump nominee will likely be approved by the upper chamber of Congress.
If confirmed, Miran will sit on a seven-member board that would, with his addition, have three Trump appointees in residence.
Miran, who was a top advisor on the economy for Trump, is thought likely to bring more presidential control to the governing body, which could push interest rate policy toward what the president believes is best.
At the time of his nomination, Trump said that Miran had “served with distinction in my First Administration,” in a post on Truth Social.
“He has been with me from the beginning of my Second Term, and his expertise in the World of Economics is unparalleled — He will do an outstanding job. Congratulations Stephen!”
It is believed that the president has long hoped to gain a majority on the Fed’s board in order to push the central bank to cut its key interest rate.
The nominee has a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, but despite his stellar qualifications, he would only serve in the role until Jan. 31, 2026, because he is filling a seat recently vacated.
Miran, if confirmed, would be replacing former Fed governor Adriana Kugler, who stepped down from the position on Aug. 1 of this year.
Should the Senate move quickly, the newly approved nominee could be in his position in time for the Fed’s meeting, which will take place early next week.
That meeting is expected to cover the topic of the reduction of key short-term interest rates, which is something of deep concern to Trump.
Fed Nominee Dr. Stephen Miran Pledges Independence.
Commits to long-term economic stewardship and serving the American people with integrity.#WashingtonEye pic.twitter.com/XeGEYrL7O4
— Washington Eye (@washington_EY) September 4, 2025
Currently, another Fed governor, Lisa Cook, is struggling to hold on to her seat on the same board, as the administration asserts her removal is necessary due to allegations she has taken part in mortgage fraud.
Attorney general Pam Bondi signaled a shift in President Trump's crackdown on urban crime, saying federal troops will head next to a "city who wants us there" instead of intervening in resistant Democratic cities.
Trump has repeatedly toyed with the idea of taking over Chicago, which has long been plagued with gang violence. But Governor J.B. Pritzker (D) and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson (D) have furiously pushed back on Trump's offer of assistance.
The Trump administration is now suggesting they will not waste time fighting with Democrats who refuse to be helped.
"They are a progressive city, and they don't want the president's help. That's on them," Bondi said of Chicago on Fox News Tuesday night. "Chicago should be begging Donald Trump for help to keep Chicago safe — yet they aren't. So we’re going to a city who wants us there."
Bondi did not say which city is next, but Trump has named Democrat-run New Orleans as another city that could use federal help with fighting crime.
Louisiana is a Republican-run state, and Trump has already said the governor, Jeff Landry, is receptive to Trump's crackdown.
According to Bondi, the feds have arrested over 2,310 people and seized over 225 guns in Washington, D.C. since Trump launched his takeover of the capital in August.
The city's police data shows that homicides have fallen 43% since the crackdown started, with violent crime dropping 18%.
The president touted his D.C. operation as a success during a rare stop at a restaurant in downtown D.C., where he teased a major announcement.
“We’re going to be announcing another city that we're going to very shortly. We’re working it out with the governor of a certain state that would love us to be there and the mayor of a certain city in the same state,” he said on Tuesday.
“We’ll announce it probably tomorrow," he added.
The takeover of D.C. expired Wednesday after Congress declined to renew it, but National Guard troops are expected to remain in the city for now.
While Bondi is pointing to a more limited federal presence in Chicago, immigration agents have started a new crackdown in the city in honor of a 20-year-old woman who was killed by an illegal alien in a hit-and-run accident.
Since beginning Operation Midway Blitz, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has arrested several criminal foreigners, including for offenses as sexually assaulting a child family member, rape, armed robbery, and domestic battery.
An alleged birthday card sent by President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein has stirred a fresh wave of controversy, prompting legal and political responses.
Amid ongoing scrutiny over his past associations, Trump has refuted claims regarding a lewd birthday card linked to Epstein, leading to significant media coverage and a defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, the Daily Mail reported.
In a detailed response to the allegations, Trump has termed the birthday card matter as "a dead issue," emphasizing his perspective during a statement to NBC News. This response comes in the wake of the Democrats' release of images from a birthday scrapbook alleged to contain a card from Trump to Epstein, featuring a provocative drawing accompanied by Trump's signature.
Trump has aggressively denied the authenticity of the birthday message, branding it as "fake" and consequently suing The Wall Street Journal for $10 billion, alleging defamation. His lawsuit highlights his team's intent to challenge the veracity of the reporting vigorously.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed Trump's denials on X, stating, "The latest piece published by the Wall Street Journal proves this entire 'Birthday Card' story is false," indicating a strong ongoing dispute over the facts presented by the media.
As part of his rebuttal, Trump has distanced himself from any knowledge or involvement in Epstein's criminal activities, asserting that he severed all ties with Epstein much earlier.
The birthday scrapbook, which was compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein's 50th birthday, has become a key piece of evidence in the ongoing controversy. Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year sentence for her involvement in Epstein’s criminal activities.
The scrapbook not only includes the contentious card but also other notable entries, such as a photo of Epstein with a large check and a humorous note about Trump and a woman both individuals knew, portraying a complex web of interactions.
Further adding to the intrigue, the scrapbook contains a handwritten note from former President Bill Clinton, among contributions from other prominent figures, demonstrating the high-profile nature of Epstein's associations.
The dissemination of these materials by Democrats has led to a severe partisan clash, with Republicans and Democrats debating the contextual handling of the recently surfaced documents.
Attorney General Pam Bondi's involvement has deepened the legal dimensions of the case, as she handed over 33,000 pages of documents related to Epstein to the House Oversight Committee, fueling further investigations.
In a DOJ interview, despite the storm of controversy, Maxwell defended Trump, stating he was "never inappropriate" despite the scrutiny over his past social ties with Epstein.
The release and interpretation of these documents have intensified the demands for transparency. Democrat Rep. Robert Garcia sharply criticized Trump's previous dismissal of the investigation, asserting in a statement to The Wall Street Journal that Trump is covering up the truth about his relationship with Epstein and the alleged birthday note.
This has spurred a broader debate on the accuracy of public figures' statements and the true extent of their past relationships. "President Trump called the Epstein investigation a hoax and claimed that his birthday note didn't exist. Now we know that Donald Trump was lying and is doing everything he can to cover up the truth. Enough of the games and lies, release the full files now," Garcia stated, highlighting the tension and the stakes involved.
The fallout from this saga continues to unfold, with legal, political, and media narratives clashing in a highly publicized battle over truth and historical transparency. As both sides of the political spectrum delve deeper, the implications are expected to resonate well beyond the current news cycle.
President Trump is demanding a quick death for the "ANIMAL" charged with murdering 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a Charlotte, North Carolina train.
Trump's call for justice comes as attorney general Pam Bondi announces federal charges against the suspect, Decarlos Brown Jr., 34. The new charges could expose Brown to the death penalty if convicted.
"The ANIMAL who so violently killed the beautiful young lady from Ukraine, who came to America searching for peace and safety, should be given a “Quick” (there is no doubt!) Trial, and only awarded THE DEATH PENALTY," Trump wrote on Truth Social on Wednesday morning.
"There can be no other option!!!"
Harrowing surveillance video of the unprovoked attack shows Zarutska sitting down in the row in front of Brown, who minutes later stabs her three times before walking away.
Zarutska's terrified reaction to the attack has gone viral on social media, fueling public outrage and demands for justice.
President Trump began to intervene in the case after it started drawing attention on the social media platform X over the weekend.
The brutal murder has been downplayed by major liberal media outlets, which have accused people on the "MAGA" right of fixating on the slaying to push a narrative about urban crime.
Many say Zarutska's murder was made possible by liberal soft-on-crime policies that allow repeat offenders to roam free and harm innocents.
Brown has a lengthy criminal history, including 14 prior arrests, but he was nevertheless released on cashless bail months before the slaying by Magistrate Judge Teresa Stokes, who is facing calls for her removal.
Attorney general Bondi pledged that Brown will never go free again as she announced charges for causing death on a mass transportation system. He is also charged with first-degree murder in North Carolina.
“Iryna Zarutska was a young woman living the American dream — her horrific murder is a direct result of failed soft-on-crime policies that put criminals before innocent people,” said Bondi.
"I have directed my attorneys to federally prosecute DeCarlos Brown Jr., a repeat violent offender with a history of violent crime, for murder. We will seek the maximum penalty for this unforgivable crime, and he will never again see the light of day as a free man," Bondi added.
If convicted on the federal charges, Brown faces a maximum statutory sentence of life in prison or death.
“The brutal attack on Iryna Zarutska on the Charlotte Light Rail was a disgraceful act that should never happen in America. The FBI jumped to assist in this investigation immediately to ensure justice is served, and the perpetrator is never released from jail to kill again,” FBI director Kash Patel said in a statement.
“I want to thank Attorney General [Pam] Bondi for her pursuit of today’s federal charges, which are the first step toward delivering justice for Iryna and her family — as well as the millions of Americans who deserve to live in our great American cities free from being targeted by violent criminals.”
Former MMA star Ronda Rousey is pre-emptively shutting down any possibility of appearing in President Trump's cage fight at the White House.
It has been confirmed that Trump will host a match on the South Lawn of the White House next summer to mark the 250th anniversary of the United States.
It is sure to be an unforgettable spectacle, but Rousey, 38, says she wants no part of the historic event.
When asked if she would accept a potential invite, the former UFC bantamweight, who has been retired since 2016, told the Lapsed Fan podcast that she has "better s*** to do."
While there is no indication that the White House has asked her to fight, Rousey is ruling it out.
“I’m not fighting at the White House,” she said. "After Mike Tyson being in the biggest fight of the year, never say never, but I ain’t fighting at the f***ing White House.”
"Even if offered? I got better s*** to do," she said.
Rousey has a history of support for Democratic politicians, backing Bernie Sanders for the presidency in 2016. She has made comments critical of Trump, who was an early supporter of UFC.
Earlier this year, Rousey said she agreed to stop publicly bashing Trump as a favor to UFC president Dana White, who is old friends with Trump.
“In 2016, Dana White specifically made me promise to not say anything bad about Donald Trump because back when they needed a venue and no one would give it to them, he did,” Rousey told NewsNation in April. “And because I feel like I owe Dana my life, I told him, ‘Alright.’”
White has credited Trump with helping to launch the UFC brand by offering his Trump Taj Mahal casino to stage fights, and the president continues to regularly attend UFC events.
After helping UFC grow to what it is today, Trump is taking the promotion company to new heights with plans for an extraordinary cage fight on the South Lawn next June.
There will be weigh-ins at the Lincoln Memorial, the Wall Street Journal reported.
“This will be one of the greatest and most historic sports events in history, and President Trump hosting it at the White House is a testament to his vision to celebrate America’s monumental 250th anniversary,” Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung told the WSJ.
The cost of Barack Obama's presidential library is nearing $1 billion, according to financial records from the former president's own foundation.
The Obama Presidential Center has been mired in development for years, but it is proceeding despite intense local opposition in Chicago - with critics slamming the towering, grey structure as both ugly and a threat to the impoverished South Side community.
The center is slated to open in the spring, five years behind schedule and more than two times over budget.
Obama, a former "community organizer," touted the progress on his center in his foundation's annual financial disclosure.
"On the South Side of Chicago—just steps from where I began my own journey as a young organizer—we’re building something big. Not just in scale, but in spirit,” Obama said in an introductory note to the report. “The Center will be a place where young people can find their voice, where neighbors can gather and exchange ideas, and where people from every corner of the world can come to be inspired, empowered, and connected.”
According to the Obama Foundation, construction has now cost over $600 million, more than double the initial $300 million estimate.
The current final estimate is a staggering $850 million, the Chicago Tribune reported.
The project has faced years of delays and legal challenges. Angry locals say the center, situated in the middle of historic Jackson Park, is ruining the flow of the neighborhood and driving up rent.
"It looks like this big piece of rock that just landed here out of nowhere in what used to be a really nice landscape of trees and flowers," Ken Woodard, 39, a lawyer and father of six who grew up in the area told Daily Mail. "It's a monstrosity."
Obama's team is reportedly planning community tours to encourage locals to “begin to imagine how they will use and enjoy” the center.
Meanwhile, Obama's friends and allies are reaping a juicy profit, with top executives at the foundation receiving over $6 million, the Daily Mail reported.
Alderwoman Jeanette Taylor, who represents the area in city government, is an Obama supporter but she has concerns about how the project will impact the neighborhood.
"We're going to see rents go higher and we're going to see families displaced," she told the Daily Mail.
"Every time large development comes to communities, they displace the very people they say they want to improve it for," she added.
A judge has dismissed criminal charges against 15 Republican alternate electors who were accused of falsely certifying the 2020 election results in favor of President Donald Trump in Michigan, Breitbart reported. The decision on Tuesday ends the case against the "false electors" brought by Democratic Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel two years ago.
There were originally 16 judges accused of certifying the election erroneously declaring Trump the winner, until one of the judges agreed to turn state's witness. District Court Judge Kristen D. Simmons dismissed the remaining cases on the grounds that the electors were acting in good faith.
Simmons determined that there was no intent to defraud the government, but rather that the defendants were responding to suspicions that Joe Biden did not win that election fair and square. "I believe they were executing their constitutional right to seek redress," Simmons said in her ruling.
This was an opinion shared by many Americans, as a November 2020 survey showed that fewer than half of Americans believed Biden won the election. The dismissal of this case represents a positive step toward reconciling the fallout from the 2020 presidential election and addressing the concerns of individuals who sought to have their claims regarding the election's veracity heard.
According to Fox News, Nessel filed the case at a time when Trump was also the target of an investigation into his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The court stated that the group of 16 met on December 14, 2020, at what was then the Michigan Republican Party headquarters, with the intention of certifying the election for Trump despite Biden having been declared the winner.
They each signed several documents certifying that they were the state's electors in an effort to secure the state's electoral votes for Trump. These documents were sent to the National Archives and Congress, making it official, which Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said warranted "accountability and justice" as the U.S. was supposedly "still in the midst of a nationally coordinated effort to weaken democracy" when the charges were filed.
For this, the 16 were facing eight criminal charges, each carrying a sentence of between five and 14 years in prison. The charges included forgery and conspiracy to commit election forgery. Those implicated included prominent members of the Michigan GOP, such as Kathy Berden, head of the state's Republican National Committee chapter; Meshawn Maddock, former co-chair of the Michigan Republican Party; and Stan Grot, Shelby Township Clerk.
Other states had similar issues with electors attempting to give the victory to Trump, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, New Mexico, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. "As we prepare for the 2024 presidential election, today’s charges are the first in an ongoing effort to not just seek justice for the wrongs of the past but to ensure they do not happen again," Benson said at the time.
Now that the case has been tossed, Nessel released a statement making bloated claims about the defendants. "The false electors' actions undermined the public's faith in the integrity of our elections and, we believe, also plainly violated the laws by which we administer our elections in Michigan," Nessel said.
As Politico reported, there is no federal law governing how electors are supposed to treat their filings, as it is dependent on each state. Many of those who submitted their certificates did so on the basis that Trump was suing to overturn the election and that they would be ready to cast their vote for him if that were the case.
The situation was unprecedented, and so the states did not have a roadmap to respond to these so-called fake electors. However, some believed that this issue was intentionally framed as a scandal rather than as an issue of readiness. As Charlie Kirk pointed out in April 2024, it is completely within the states' rights to retain "alternate" electors.
"There is no such thing as a 'fake elector.' There are ALTERNATE electors. There are COMPETING SLATES of electors," Kirk wrote in a post to X, formerly Twitter. "It's a Democrat precedent from 1960. CNN's Van Jones advocated for them in 2020. Harvard Professor Larry Lessig advocated for them in 2020. Democrats and their media flacks are attempting to criminalize a concept they themselves invented and have utilized with impunity."
There is no such thing as a "fake elector."
There are ALTERNATE electors.
There are COMPETING SLATES of electors.It's a Democrat precedent from 1960. CNN's Van Jones advocated for them in 2020. Harvard Professor Larry Lessig advocated for them in 2020.
Democrats and their…
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) April 25, 2024
The political atmosphere following the 2020 presidential election was one of upheaval and uncertainty, as many believed Trump would successfully overturn the election results and were prepared for it. As a result, the legal system attempted to go after Trump and his supporters, but this dismissal is one of the last wrongs to be righted from that time.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt set the record straight that President Donald Trump did not act as an FBI informant in the case of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, The Hill reported. The rumor surfaced last week after House Speaker Mike Johnson mentioned it during a press conference.
Leavitt was asked about Johnson's claim on Tuesday during a White House press briefing. When Johnson was asked about Trump's supposed connections to Epstein, Johnson said that the president "was an FBI informant to try to take this stuff down" referring to the sex trafficker's heinous conduct.
"I can affirm that is not true," Leavitt told reporters. "I think the Speaker was referring to the fact that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago property for reasons the president has already discussed," she added.
Johnson also took the opportunity to set the record straight on his previous remarks on Monday and called it "much ado about nothing" after the media's coverage of the throwaway line. According to CNN, Johnson clarified what he meant by his previous statement while speaking to the press.
"What I was referring to in that long conversation was what the (Epstein) victims’ attorney said. More than a decade ago, President Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago, and he was one of the only people, one of the only prominent people, as everyone has reported … that he was willing to help law enforcement go after this guy who was a disgusting child abuser, sex trafficker, all the allegations," Johnson explained.
"That’s what they heard. So the president was helpful in that," Johnson added.
"I don’t know if I used the right terminology, but that’s common knowledge, and everybody knows that. So this is much ado about nothing," Johnson said. The CNN reporter asked Johnson if Trump told him about being an informant, and the Louisiana Republican said it was "recounting what others have said" but that Trump had spoken out against "the Epstein evils many times" before.
"I was repeating what has been common knowledge for a long time. The president was helpful in trying to get Epstein for the law enforcement to go after Epstein. That’s always been my understanding. That’s common knowledge. It’s the public’s understanding. I didn’t — I was not breaking news there, OK? What I’m trying to emphasize is that the president is as disgusted about this as everyone is," Johnson said.
During the entire term of former President Joe Biden, the press did not seem interested in learning more about Epstein, his victims, or his crimes. Now that Trump is in office, they are demanding answers, which the Trump administration has admittedly been short on aside from the established narrative.
Trump has called this aspect of their curiosity a "hoax," which the leftist media has tried to claim was a dismissal of the entire story. Johnson was explaining this aspect when he said that Trump was an informant. "He’s not saying that what Epstein did is a hoax," Johnson explained on Friday.
"It’s a terrible, unspeakable evil. He believes that himself. When he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago," Johnson added, which is an established fact that even the media admits to.
"He was an FBI informant to try to take this stuff down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered these unspeakable harms," Johnson said, which is what sparked the media questions about the fact.
Trump may not have been an informant, but he certainly seemed like one of the few wealthy and powerful individuals who stopped associating with Epstein after getting to know him better. The left can spin this however they choose, but the truth is that they are the ones who looked the other way for years on the Epstein case, and America knows it.