In a startling confession, former President Biden admitted to the New York Times that he did not approve many of the controversial pardons that he nominally signed at the end of his term.
Biden defended his administration's frequent use of an autopen as perfectly "legal," and insisted that he made "every decision." But he also conceded that he delegated the details of the pardon process to his staff because there were too many to sign.
"We’re talking about a whole lot of people," he said.
Biden's frequent use of the autopen has fueled doubts about his authority over the White House and the legitimacy of the actions he took as president, especially the controversial pardon spree of his final days in power.
Biden granted clemency to 4,000 inmates, including nearly every federal prisoner on death row, and he gave pre-emptive pardons to members of his own family.
According to the Times, Biden "did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons that applied to large numbers of people, he and aides confirmed."
Biden only approved the basic criteria that were used for three sets of mass pardons, the Times reported. A fourth set of pardons involved high-profile Trump critics like Mark Milley and Anthony Fauci, and Biden insisted he discussed their cases individually.
“We know how vindictive Trump is, and I’ve no doubt they would have gone after Mark for no good reason,” Biden said.
“The general, you know. So they may read off his name — what’d I want? I told them I wanted to make sure he had a pardon because I knew exactly what Trump would do — without any merit, I might add.”
The White House used a multi-step process to record the proof of Biden's involvement.
Senior advisers like chief of staff Jeff Zients would relay Biden's decisions to assistants to be written down. The assistants, who were not present for Biden's meetings, would then send their notes back to Biden's advisers for approval before sending them off to staff secretary Stefanie Feldman, who had the autopen.
If revisions were made to the pardon list, staff would run the final versions through the autopen without asking Biden to sign again.
On the final night of his presidency, Biden made the decision to pre-emptively pardon his family members, but Zients had the final sign-off.
In an e-mail at 10:31 p.m. on January 19, he wrote, "I approve the use of the autopen for the execution of all of the following pardons."
President Trump can go ahead with mass layoffs at the Department of Education, the Supreme Court has ruled.
The decision is the latest in a streak of court victories for Trump, who is pursuing an aggressive effort to dismantle the Department and much of the federal bureaucracy.
The justices provided no explanation for the move, which reversed a lower court ruling that ordered Trump to reinstate 1,400 employees - roughly half the agency's workforce.
Trump has pledged to end the Department of Education, citing low academic performance in American public schools.
The Department handles roles like tracking student progress, overseeing financial aid, including student loans, and enforcing federal civil rights law. Since the agency can only be abolished by an act of Congress, Trump has tried to tear it down piecemeal.
A federal judge appointed by President Biden, Judge Myong J. Joun, had blocked Trump in May from firing 1,400 employees, ruling the mass layoffs amounted to an illegal effort to bypass Congress.
The Supreme Court's reversal is the latest Trump victory to come from the so-called emergency docket. Such rulings often come with little explanation and without a full briefing.
The court's ruling prompted a furious dissent from the liberal justices, who have vocally criticized recent Supreme Court rulings in Trump's favor.
The Supreme Court "hands the Executive the power to repeal statutes by firing all those necessary to carry them out," liberal Sonia Sotomayor wrote.
"The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naive, but either way the threat to our Constitution’s separation of powers is grave."
The ruling allows Trump to proceed with layoffs while the legal battle continues.
While liberals responded with predictable alarmism, the Trump administration hailed the Supreme Court's decision as a necessary rebuke of judicial activism coming from lower courts.
White House spokeswoman, Liz Huston, said in a statement that the court had “once again recognized what radical district court judges refuse to accept — President Trump, as head of the executive branch, has absolute constitutional authority to direct and manage its agencies and officers.”
In a separate decision last week, the Supreme Court cleared Trump to lay off thousands of employees at different federal agencies, reversing a district court that tried to block the plan.
Within days of the Supreme Court's reversal, the State Department fired 1,300 staffers.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
It's already been 10 years since state officials in Florida decided they would censor a Christian school's prayer – they essentially banned it – before a high-school football game.
And now multitudes are asking the Supreme Court to step in and offer guidance on the issues of free speech, religious rights, state censorship and more.
WorldNetDaily has reported on the fight over the decision by the Florida High School Athletic Association to prevent Cambridge Christian School from offering a brief prayer before the state championship game.
A federal judge twice has ruled that the state can, indeed, censor the prayer.
It was Charlene Honeywell, a judge, who ruled against the private Christian school in Tampa. Honeywell claimed in her opinion that because the game was hosted by the association at a government-owned stadium, listeners would have heard the prayer as "government speech."
She said that means the FHSAA had the right to censor the message.
However, Hiram Sasser, of First Liberty Institute, explained that the real issue is whether the school was banned from prayer over the PA system because the words were "religious." That would be considered viewpoint discrimination and is illegal.
"The athletic association, like so many people, uses that PA system for … messages of their own choosing, or they read off messages, advertising messages, and everything else," Sasser said. "So there is so much private use of that PA system. To not allow the schools to use it for their opening prayer they always had just doesn't make any sense."
Honeywell also criticized the request for prayer itself, claiming that while it is a "preference" for the Christian school, it somehow is not a deeply rooted tradition that qualifies as a "sincerely held belief," even though Christian prayers have been going for roughly 2,000 years.
Honeywell earlier tried to dismiss the case entirely, but quickly was corrected by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Now, with the case pending before the Supreme Court, First Liberty Institute has revealed that more than 10 friend-of-the-court briefs have been filed.
They represent nearly 100 individuals and organizations, and, highlight the danger of the appellate decision and support First Liberty's call for Santa Fe v. Doe to be overturned.
Jesse Panuccio, of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, said: "The influx friend-of-the-court briefs in this case demonstrate the dangers of the Eleventh Circuit's decision, which permits the state to censor religious speech by calling it 'government speech.' That so many organizations, individuals, and law firms are urging the Supreme Court to hear this case shows how important it is for the Supreme Court to continue to make clear that the Constitution forbids religious discrimination in all its guises."
Jeremy Dys, of First Liberty Institute, said, "We grateful to so many who gave of their time to write and file these briefs for the simple proposition that government cannot treat religious speech—like prayer—as second class. Our hope is that the Supreme Court will take this important case and remind its lower courts of the First Amendment's double protection for religious expression."
The briefs come from across the world of arts, sports, faith, and politics, including:
A long list of prominent legal teams also have joined, including lawyers representing Hogen Lovells US LLP, Sidley Austin, LLP, Clement & Murphy, PLLC, Vinson & Elkins LLP, McDermot Will and Emery, and others.
The state censored plans for a prayer before the 2015 championship between Cambridge and another Christian school at the Citrus Bowl.
The state previously had allowed innumerable private messages over the game's PA system, but decided it would not allow a Christian message.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
PALM BEACH, Florida – Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is reportedly ready to testify before the U.S. Congress, potentially exposing the depths of the sordid pedophile network the pair ran.
According to Britain's Daily Mail, the 63-year-old Maxwell who is the only person behind bars in connection with the Epstein's network of underage girls, "is willing to speak in front of Congress."
A source told the paper: "Despite the rumors, Ghislaine was never offered any kind of plea deal. She would be more than happy to sit before Congress and tell her story.
"No one from the government has ever asked her to share what she knows. She remains the only person to be jailed in connection to Epstein and she would welcome the chance to tell the American public the truth."
Maxwell is currently incarcerated in Tallahassee State Prison in Florida, serving 20 years for child sex trafficking as she groomed underage girls for both Epstein and his group of powerful elites, though to date not a single purported client of the former Palm Beach resident has faced criminal charges.
The Daily Mail reported:
A source close to Maxwell told Daily Mail that the former girlfriend of Epstein – who continues to protest her innocence – would "welcome the chance to sit in front of Congress and tell her story."
The source said: "Congressional hearings have been held into everything from JFK's assassination to 9/11. The Epstein Files rank up there with those cases. Ghislaine would be willing to speak before Congress and tell her story."
Maxwell is also fighting to have her appeal heard by the Supreme Court. On July 14, lawyers for the U.S. government will submit their response to her plea for the Supreme Court to take up her case.
President Trump's former "First Buddy" Elon Musk sensationally claimed there is a cover-up because Trump is mentioned in the Epstein Files, something sources close to Maxwell say "is a false flag."
"President Trump was photographed with Epstein several times and they ran in the same circles but Trump was one of the first to break all contact with Epstein because they fell out over a business deal and Epstein's treatment of women," the informed source said.
"There are no big shocks about President Trump in the Epstein Files. But there are a lot of powerful men involved and a lot of money and it will come down to following the money."
Over the weekend, as WorldNetDaily reported, President Donald Trump voiced his extreme displeasure with ongoing controversy over Attorney General Pam Bondi's refusal to release files on the convicted pedophile, amid rumors FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino may resign over the issue.
In a lengthy post Saturday on Truth Social, Trump said: "What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?' They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening.
"We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein. For years, it's Epstein, over and over again."
Investigative journalist Alex Jones on Sunday said the Trump administration's reversal on releasing the Epstein files is "the mother of all scandals."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., is renewing his call for the Department of Justice to investigation Anthony Fauci, who was Joe Biden's key COVID adviser during the China virus pandemic, and has been accused of orchestrating funding for the Wuhan lab from which the deadly threat likely emerged, as well as promoting COVID shots that have proven injurious to many while suppressing other existing treatments.
The Washington Examiner reported Paul sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi asking for the DOJ's review "for possible criminal prosecution regarding Fauci's congressional testimony in May 2021 about gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology."
Fauci used to be the chief of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the White House Coronavirus Task Force when the pandemic erupted, later being a medical adviser to Biden.
"In July 2023, I referred Dr. Anthony Fauci to the Department of Justice for lying under oath to Congress. His own emails directly contradicted his sworn testimony," Paul explained in a statement. "The New York Times reports Fauci was quietly pardoned by an autopen, operated by Biden's staff. If the President didn't authorize this pardon personally, then the Department has a duty to investigate and prosecute as it would any ordinary citizen. Fauci has been sainted by the extremist Left, but it doesn't erase his lying before Congress."
Fauci was, in fact, granted a preemptive pardon by the Biden White House, but there are open disputes as to whether those were personally authorized by him, or whether his staff and advisers simply used the autopen technology to imprint Biden's signature on pardons they prepared.
"I write to renew my previous requests for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to open an investigation into former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Anthony Fauci's testimony before the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on May 11, 2021," Paul wrote.
"This most recent request stems from new allegations that call into question the validity of Dr. Fauci's purported pardon."
Paul explained, "New information has revealed that these pardons were executed via autopen, with no documented confirmation that the President personally reviewed or approved each individual grant of clemency. According to reports, White House staff authorized the use of the autopen to issue the clemency documents. This raises serious constitutional and legal concerns about the legitimacy of Dr. Fauci's pardon."
It was a report at Real Clear Wire that noted the original complaints about Fauci were that he lied to Congress about the lab, its funding and on other issues.
That report also suggested that despite the "pardon" from the White House, he still could face legal jeopardy.
Former Senate investigator Jason Foster, who now runs the whistleblower nonprofit Empower Oversight, says Congress can, in fact, demand answers, even about whether he lied before.
"They can ask him if he lied before, replough old ground," Foster said. "And if he lies about any prior lie, he can be prosecuted for that or held in contempt."
Andrew Noymer, associate professor of population health and disease prevention at the University of California, Irvine, said such hearings are necessary for scientific and historical reasons. "I'm hopeful that he will now come clean about everything he knows about the origins of the virus. For the sake of public trust in science – explaining what killed 20 million people – that a complete account is much more important than speculation about what criminal penalties he may have avoided."
Another expert, on the Trump transition team, said, "These pardons will not stop Department of Justice investigations. We expected this and look at it as a predicate to get truth from people who can no longer use the Fifth Amendment. Now we can bring every one of them in front of a grand jury."
Fauci, during the pandemic, at one point arrogantly insisted he is "science."
He was known for flip-flopping his positions on COVID during the pandemic.
The report noted, "Fauci's habit of bending the truth, as some see it, was notably on display at a July 2021 Senate hearing when Rand Paul, the Kentucky Republican, bore into the funding Fauci approved for gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. While Fauci attempted to downplay his financial involvement with the Chinese government lab, reports were already percolating. In April 2020, Newsweek reported that Fauci had approved a grant for risky 'gain of function' virus research at the Wuhan lab. The Washington Post editorial board in March 2021 then called for an independent investigation into EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit funded by the Fauci-run National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases. With this grant, EcoHealth subcontracted research to the Chinese, the Post noted, to do experiments involving 'modifying viral genomes to give them new properties, including the ability to infect lung cells of laboratory mice that had been genetically modified to respond as human respiratory cells would.'"
EcoHealth Alliance later was barred from getting any federal funds.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
Lara Trump, President Donald Trump's daughter-in-law and a potential candidate for the Senate from North Carolina, says eventually more details about Jeffrey Epstein will be released by the administration.
Her comments came in a podcast with Benny Johnson amid a firestorm now engulfing MAGA, President Trump and Republicans after the Department of Justice issued a statement that Epstein died of suicide and there aren't more details coming out.
At issue are suspicions of his alleged operations providing young girls to a number of acquaintances including political figures and celebrities – whether those claims are true and if so, who was involved.
She explained President Trump is listening to his base on the issue and knows how "important" it is and he will "set things right."
"There needs to be more transparency. I think that will happen. I know this is important to the President. He is frustrated," she said. "He is going to want to set things right. I believe there will be more coming and anything they are able to release they will try to get out. They hear it and understand it. … To anyone worked up out there, there is no plot to keep this information away. I'm sure we will know down the line … ."
A report at Just the News explained her remarks come amid calls from some for Attorney General Pam Bondi to resign over her handling of the situation.
Meanwhile, the GOP is awaiting word from her whether she will enter the race for the North Carolina Senate seat, following the decision from Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican, to not seek re-election.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A Republican member of Congress is urging people to be hanged publicly if they're found to be involved with the crimes of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
U.S. Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee was speaking to reporters about the case Tuesday when he was asked, "Should there be an investigation or a special counsel investigation?"
Burchett responded:" I don't know, I'm not an attorney. I just – find 'em guilty and hang 'em publicly. That's not over the top either. I'm ready. I'm over it. It disgusts me."
He added: "I'm big on clarity and transparency and that's a good reason people don't trust government in either party."
The congressman was then asked: "You don't believe what the Justice Department is saying?"
"No, I don't," Burchett replied. "I don't trust 'em."
President Donald Trump revisited the Epstein issue Tuesday, telling reporters just before flying to Pittsburgh that U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi should release more files if they were "credible."
"It's gonna be up to her. Whatever she thinks is credible, she should release," Trump said, adding Bondi "has handled it very well."
Meanwhile, U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., is now demanding a special counsel to probe the Epstein case.
"We need a special counsel. That has got to happen," she told journalist Benny Johnson.
"I hope it doesn't become a false idol to Republicans where we just lose sight of everything else, but that doesn't mean we don't want answers."
House Oversight Chair James Comer of Kentucky urged Bondi on Tuesday to begin exposing and arresting individuals connected to the Epstein network and its cover-up.
"Take the ball and run with it," Comer told Johnson. "People want to see accountability.
"There have been a lot of investigations. The Deep State has been exposed thanks to [CIA Director John] Ratcliffe and [FBI Director] Kash Patel. Let's start prosecuting these people. Let's set some examples out of some people."
Also speaking with Johnson, Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia debunked a false narrative that House Republicans unanimously voted to block the release of the Epstein files.
"That is not true," she said, explaining it was merely a procedural vote to preclude Democrats from gaining control of the House floor.
"That means they could bring up anything. They could bring up impeachment articles against President Trump. They could bring up a whole package of insane, Democrat-agenda items and force votes on the House floor on these things."
Former President Joe Biden has admitted that he did not personally sign the many pardons granted to criminals as he was leaving office, Breitbart reported. Instead, Biden gave his staff the criteria for issuing them and authorized them to use an autopen.
Biden made this admission to The New York Times, which confirmed what many had feared. At least three of the four large batches of pardons signed in the last days of his administration involved whole categories of criminals whom he did not individually vet and sign off on.
"BOMBSHELL: The NYT quietly confirms Biden aides used the autopen to issue executive actions WITHOUT a clear sign he even approved them. This is EXACTLY why we're investigating," the House Oversight Committee shared on X, formerly Twitter. "We must know WHO was calling the shots in the West Wing. The 5th will not help them cover up the BIGGEST political scandal in history."
🚨 BOMBSHELL: The NYT quietly confirms Biden aides used the autopen to issue executive actions WITHOUT a clear sign he even approved them.
This is EXACTLY why we're investigating. We must know WHO was calling the shots in the West Wing.
The 5th will not help them cover up the… pic.twitter.com/lWkDz5ufMR
— Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) July 14, 2025
The use of the autopen is particularly controversial, given that Biden delegated his responsibility to his underlings. The Times notes that "the Bureau of Prisons kept providing additional information about specific inmates, resulting in small changes to the list" of prisoners to be pardoned.
"Rather than ask Mr. Biden to keep signing revised versions, his staff waited and then ran the final version through the autopen, which they saw as a routine procedure, the aide said," the Times reported. Use of the autopen was delegated to then-White House staff secretary Stefanie Feldman.
She was reportedly carrying out Biden's wishes, as made known in meetings with his top advisers, including White House Counsel Ed Siskel and Chief of Staff Jeffrey Zients. They would, in turn, tell their assistants, who would compile lists and send them to Feldman.
The email chain provided Feldman with cover to make the pardons, which sometimes came on the spur of the moment. On January 19, which was Biden's last full day in office, Zients gave the okay for a batch just minutes after receiving one of those emails.
"…Mr. Zients hit ‘reply all’ and wrote, ‘I approve the use of the autopen for the execution of all of the following pardons,'" the Times said of one of the emails. Although Biden ostensibly made these decisions, the involvement of staffers has opened the door to challenges to these pardons.
As Fox News reported, this uncertainty has raised questions about the pardon of Anthony Fauci. The former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and medical adviser to Biden received a blanket pardon that may have been autopen-signed.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) believes this is grounds for reopening his probe into Fauci's role in the COVID-19 pandemic. Paul has accused him of lying to Congress about his involvement in the gain-of-function research funding that may have contributed to the creation of the virus.
"Today I will reissue my criminal referral of Anthony Fauci to Trump DOJ," Paul said Monday on X. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has requested that Attorney General Pam Bondi launch a probe into the use of an autopen, in addition to those already underway in the House and Senate.
With so many reports about Biden's mental decline finally coming out, the use of an autopen becomes particularly relevant. "I guarantee you he knew nothing about what he was signing, I guarantee you," Trump said.
Many suspected that Biden was experiencing cognitive difficulties for years. Now, some are finally admitting that these autopen signatures need to be scrutinized and perhaps discarded if Biden wasn't fully aware and in control of the decisions for whatever reason.
Attorney General Pam Bondi fired the ethics official who advises her and other top Justice Department officials of their ethical obligations, a source in the DOJ told ABC News on Monday.
Joseph Tirell posted about his dissmissal on LinkedIn on Monday, including a photo of his termination notice, which apparently didn't include a reason for the firing.
"Until Friday evening, I was the senior ethics attorney at the Department of Justice responsible for advising the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General directly on federal employee ethics," Tirrell said in the post. "I was also responsible for the day-to-day operations of the ethics program across the Department."
His firing appears to be part of the DOJ purge of personnel who participated in former Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation into and case against President Donald Trump.
Around 35 DOJ employees have been fired so far, and 15 more are likely on the chopping block.
While no official word about why Tirell was fired has been given, a theory has been espoused by several former officials.
Tirell was director of the DOJ's Ethics Office when Smith disclosed that he had been gifted $140,000 in pro bono legal services while he was special counsel.
Tirell apparently signed off on the gift as following the regulations and requirements of the agency, an ethical lapse that could have led to his firing.
The purge is itself a development that has arisen out of the "Weaponization Working Group" formed by Bondi when she first took office as U.S. Attorney General.
The DOJ leadership under Trump is concerned that its personnel could work against Trump the way various personnel did during his first administration.
It's a valid concern because it happened both while he was in office and after.
The DOJ reportedly has tried to distinguish personnel who were only obeying orders from the higher ups from those who seemed to have ill will toward Trump and acted against him on their own initiative.
Trump vowed while campaigning to get rid of what he called the deep state, which is made up of longtime officials who have more sympathies for Democrat administrations than Republican ones.
At least within the DOJ, Trump's pledge is being taken very seriously.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
President Donald Trump is expressing his extreme displeasure with ongoing controversy over Attorney General Pam Bondi's refusal to release files on convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, amid reports FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino may resign over the issue, and reaction from Trump supporters is not positive.
In a lengthy post Saturday on Truth Social, Trump said: "What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?' They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening.
"We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein. For years, it's Epstein, over and over again.
"Why are we giving publicity to Files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration, who conned the World with the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax, 51 'Intelligence' Agents, 'THE LAPTOP FROM HELL,' and more? They created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier that they used on me, and now my so-called 'friends' are playing right into their hands.
"Why didn't these Radical Left Lunatics release the Epstein Files? If there was ANYTHING in there that could have hurt the MAGA Movement, why didn't they use it? They haven't even given up on the John F. Kennedy or Martin Luther King, Jr. Files. No matter how much success we have had, securing the Border, deporting Criminals, fixing the Economy, Energy Dominance, a Safer World where Iran will not have Nuclear Weapons, it's never enough for some people.
"We are about to achieve more in 6 months than any other Administration has achieved in over 100 years, and we have so much more to do. We are saving our Country and, MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, which will continue to be our complete PRIORITY.
"The Left is imploding! Kash Patel, and the FBI, must be focused on investigating Voter Fraud, Political Corruption, ActBlue, The Rigged and Stolen Election of 2020, and arresting Thugs and Criminals, instead of spending month after month looking at nothing but the same old, Radical Left inspired Documents on Jeffrey Epstein. LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB — SHE'S GREAT!
"The 2020 Election was Rigged and Stolen, and they tried to do the same thing in 2024 — That's what she is looking into as AG, and much more. One year ago our Country was DEAD, now it's the 'HOTTEST' Country anywhere in the World. Let's keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
Supporters of Trump expressed their own outrage at the president's remarks.
One woman who calls herself a "Magadonian wife and mother" indicated: "This statement breaks my heart, Mr. President. I have four daughters, and live in Texas, where families lost little children. I can't even begin to comprehend the flipped narrative that 'it was so long ago' 'why are we still talking about this' and 'nobody should care.' These victims were someone's daughters, sisters, nieces, granddaughter. Someone's child. Please reconsider, sir.
"I voted for everything you are doing! Accountability was not something negotiable. I, my family, and those we convinced to give you a chance are all counting on you to bring sick perversion to account. Otherwise it will continue to happen. If we are not the voice of the victims then who? Respectfully and with much gratitude for all the promises you keep. Please let this one be one, as well. ~Much love to you and yours."
Another told Trump: "We want the ELITE PEDOS exposed! You promised us that. Pam promised us that. Kash [Patel] promised us that. Now it's OUR fault [because] we want that promise fulfilled and call Pam out every time she lies? What else has she lied to us about?"
As WorldNetDaily reported, there have been numerous reports that if Bondi remains as attorney general, then either FBI Director Kash Patel or Bongino may quit.
Journalist and Trump ally Laura Loomer said: "We might not have a Deputy FBI Director by Monday. We could possibly see a weekend resignation from the FBI by Dan Bongino.
"Source tells me Kash Patel agrees with Bongino's sentiment and also agrees that Blondi needs to be removed from her post as AG.
"Now it's up to President Trump to step in. The MAGA base would like to see Trump FIRE Blondi. She is a massive liability to this otherwise great administration."