This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
An often-criticized precedent from the Supreme Court 20 years ago that gives local governments permission to literally confiscate a landowner's property and give it to someone else who may have more political influence could be overturned through a new case pending before the justices.
It is the Institute for Justice that has been fighting on behalf of Bryan Bowers, a New York landowner whose property was "seized" by a local government agency.
It was then given to his competitors.
The precedent that soon could be doomed is the Kelo decision from 2005 in which the court redefined "public use."
That's the standard that courts must use to determine whether governments can take over private property without the owner's consent, and it often is associated with the construction of roads and bridges and such.
In Kelo, a single-vote on the court claimed that creating jobs or increasing tax revenue was just that "public use."
Dissenters, including a left-leaning Justice Sandra Day O'Connor warned that now the government "has license to transfer property from those with fewer resources to those with more."
The IJ described the Kelo precedent as "one of the most reviled decisions in recent decades."
The new case will be presented to the court in a conference in the coming days.
"State legislatures, state high courts, and American voters amending their own state constitutions have all rejected Kelo because it is simply wrong to let the government take one person's property away in order to hand it to another private owner with more political power," said IJ Deputy Litigation Director Bob McNamara. "This case gives the Supreme Court the opportunity to say the same."
The case earlier was considered at the court's Feb. 21 conference, when the justices told the New York state court to provide the record on appeal. That now has been provided.
The IJ noted, "Bowers' case was supported by a brief from the Cato Institute and George Mason University (Scalia Law School) Professor Ilya Somin and a brief from the Buckeye Institute. Cato and Somin write about the widespread confusion Kelo created in lower courts while the Buckeye Institute shined a light on the injustices of eminent domain and frequently failed promises of redevelopment."
The out-of-sync ruling in 2005 triggered 45 states to change their own laws to prevent what the 5-4 Kelo decision said could be done to property owners.
Bryan Bowers and his business partner Mike Licata purchased property across the street from a new hospital in Utica, New York, but then lost it when the Oneida County Industrial Development Agency took it by eminent domain and handed it over to their potential competitors to be used for parking.
The Fifth Amendment allows private property to be taken for "public use" with "just compensation" and in addition to roads, has been used for schools and other infrastructure.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
There could be a new problem for a judge hearing a lawsuit brought by LGBT activists against President Donald Trump's decision that the United States recognizes two sexes, male and female, and being transgender and requiring various treatments and accommodations disqualifies someone from the military's requirement for combat readiness.
Trump's move reversed an agenda point for multiple Democrats to install transgenderism inside the U.S. military.
It's because the judge, Ana Reyes, has been a prominent financial supporter of Democrat political candidates and causes.
The Federalist explains its investigation of the judge uncovered a complaint that the Department of Justice has filed against the Joe Biden appointee, accusing her of "hostile and egregious misconduct" during a hearing in the case.
The DOJ said Reyes, "who is reportedly a member of the LGBT community," challenged Trump's order by claiming his assertion there are two sexes is 'not biologically correct."
She claimed, "There are anywhere near about 30 different intersex examples. So, someone who does not have just an XX or XY chromosome is not just male or female; they're intersex. And there are over 30 potential different intersex examples."
The complaint also cites Reyes' behavior in "questioning a Department of Justice attorney regarding his religious beliefs and then using him unwillingly as a physical prop in her courtroom theatrics."
The Federalist reported, "While unbecoming of a judge, Reyes' reported behavior is unsurprising given her fealty to leftist causes. From donating to Democrat campaigns to working alongside left-wing organizations, the Biden appointee's track record calls into question her ability to remain impartial on political matters brought before her."
The report said the Federal Election Commission records shows Reyes has adopted a political stance in favor of Democrats and has "given thousands of dollars to various Democrat candidates and causes."
For instance, she financially supported Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris and Joe Biden, in addition to congressional candidates Jon Ossoff and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez.
And she gave money to support leftist political action committees.
She even contributed to Democrat fundraiser ActBlue, which now is under investigation for allegedly allowing foreign entities to try to illegally corrupt American elections.
Reyes already has issued an injunction regarding Trump's executive order for the military, as the case just is getting started.
She is trying to overturn Trump's directive that explained the "medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on individuals with gender dysphoria" is "inconsistent" with the "high standards for troop readiness, lethality, cohesion, honesty, humility, uniformity, and integrity."
The Pentagon already has halted taxpayer funding for various treatments for those with "gender dysphoria."
The report noted her court biography also reveals her work before becoming a judge focused on various topics at a law firm that was devoted "to leftist orthodoxy," and included litigating against President Trump during his first term.
New evidence in the Gene Hackman case shows that his wife placed a phone call after police say she was already dead.
The shocking discovery has led cops to admit that they need to adjust their timeline of how Hackman and his wife both died at their Santa Fa home.
The twist came Monday when a Santa Fe doctor said that Betsy Arakawa called his office on February 12. That would have been impossible according to the initial story told by police, who said Arakawa died on February 11.
It is believed that Hackman was unaware of his wife's demise before he died about a week later from a heart condition, with Alzheimer's as a contributing factor.
Dr. Josiah Child of Cloudberry Health in New Mexico told the Daily Mail that Arakawa had called two weeks prior to her own death about getting her husband's heart checked out.
“Mrs. Hackman didn’t die on February 11 because she called my clinic on February 12,” Child told the Daily Mail this week. “She’d called me a couple of weeks before her death to ask about getting an echocardiogram [heart scan] for her husband.”
Child said Arakawa did not present any breathing problems when she called about an unrelated medical issue on February 12 - contradicting the medical examiner's conclusion that she died from a rare respiratory illness carried by rats, hantavirus.
Arakawa had cancelled a February 12 appointment two days earlier, saying her husband wasn't feeling well. She called the clinic again on the morning of February 12 and they told her to come in that afternoon.
The clinic tried calling Arakawa back twice, but she didn't respond.
“We made her an appointment but she never showed up. She did not show any symptoms of respiratory distress. The appointment wasn’t for anything related to hantavirus. We tried calling her a couple of times with no reply," Child said.
After Child's bombshell interview, Santa Fe police independently confirmed through cellphone data that Arakawa was still alive on Feb. 12.
“We can now confirm that Mrs. Hackman’s phone was utilized on the morning of February 12 to call a medical center in Santa Fe, Cloudberry Health,” the sheriff’s office told Today in a statement.
Arakawa's rapid decline has baffled some medical specialists, who say it's highly unusual for a respiratory infection to kill so suddenly.
"Respiratory failure is not sudden – it is something that worsens over several days," a Los Angeles doctor told the Daily Mail.
"Most people get admitted to the ER [emergency room] because they are having trouble breathing. It's exceedingly rare for a seemingly healthy 65-year-old to drop dead of it. In fact, no one's heard of such a thing."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
'We don't want vicious, violent, and demented criminals, many of them deranged murderers, in our country'
Multiple district court judges across the country, many with reputations as left-leaning activists, have been busy since the start of President Donald Trump's second term, issuing nationwide injunctions to try to prevent him from implementing his policies for the executive branch.
More than 100 cases remain to be decided, with expectations many will reach the Supreme Court in one form or another.
But the courts' lawfare against the president has created what many analysts have suggested is a constitutional crisis, with the judges' deliberate interference in the constitutional responsibilities of the president.
Now Trump is responding, in one specific case, with a call for the judge to be removed.
On Truth Social, Trump cited the activism of James Boasberg, a federal judge in Washington who was appointed by Barack Obama, who had demanded that terrorists being deported by the Trump administration be returned to the U.S.
That order was unsuccessful in that situation, because over the weekend the planes loaded with deportees he wanted back in the U.S. already were in international airspace, so his ruling had no effect.
Further, investigative journalist Laura Loomer revealed there appears to be a huge conflict of interest for Boasberg, suggesting he should have, under ethics standards, removed himself from the case.
She explained, "Less than 12 hours after I exposed Judge James Boasberg's conflict of interest with his daughter Katharine Boasberg, who works for a 501c3 called 'Partners For Justice' @PFJ_USA that gives criminal illegal aliens and gang members legal advice, Katharine Boasberg has DELETED her @LinkedIn page and her Instagram account. I have exclusively uncovered a massive CONFLICT OF INTEREST involving Judge James Boasberg, the Chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Judge Boasberg recently made the decision to prevent the deportation of criminal illegal alien gang members on planes out of the country. This is enough for President Trump's legal team to push for a MOTION FOR RECUSAL for Judge Boasberg."
It's not the first time such a situation has arisen for a judge working on a lawfare case against Trump. When Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg wildly claimed that business reporting misdemeanors, for which the statute of limitations already had passed, actually were felonies and put Trump on trial, Judge Juan Merchan allowed testimony from a former porn star and a convicted perjurer to be used against Trump to obtain a conviction.
It also was revealed that Merchan's daughter is a Democrat operative who was advising campaigns, and making money off the decisions her father was making against Trump in court.
Boasberg, meanwhile, has demanded the Trump administration explain why it didn't order the airplanes deporting terrorists and gang members over the weekend to turn around in the air as he had ordered.
In fact, he issued a verbal order, and then followed that with a slightly different written order. The administration said it followed the written order, but in fact, the airplanes already were outside U.S. territorial jurisdiction.
Boasberg claimed that the administration knew he was holding a hearing on those deportations, and presumably should have waited for him to make his demands known.
Donald Trump Jr. encouraged supporters of his father President Donald Trump to vote in the Wisconsin Supreme Court special election in two weeks to help solidify the Trump agenda.
Trump Jr. appeared at the Turning Point USA event with Charlie Kirk to help get out the vote for Brad Schimel, Waukesha County judge and former Republican state attorney general, in the bellwether race for the next set of elections.
Technically, the race is non-partisan, but Republicans are backing Schimel over Dane County Judge Susan Crawford, who is backed by Democrats.
“They can’t just show up when he happens to be on the top of that ticket,” Trump Jr. said of his father. “You have to engage because it’s not just about now, it’s about that future. This presidency can be put to a halt with this vote.”
As a way to stop Democrats from blocking Trump's agenda, Trump Jr. said, “It's everything."
The winner on April 1 will determine the majority of the court.
The race is seen as an indication of how swing voters feel about Trump post-election, and could show how the midterms may be likely to go (though it's pretty early to be deterministic about that yet).
The state supreme court is facing cases on abortion rights, congressional district boundaries, unions, and voting rules.
Schimel strongly backs Trump and attended the inauguration in January.
He spoke at the rally to urge voters to turn out for him.
“Do you think the job is done?” Schimel said. “We have to stay vigilant, and we have to stay on this.”
Trump has not endorsed a candidate in the race, but supporters hope he might before the votes are cast.
“I can’t overemphasize the importance of this election,” Trump voter Soslan Temanson, 26, of Westfield said. “I think it’s important Trump went all-in on Wisconsin.”
The last Supreme Court election saw the liberal candidate win by double digits, which has led Elon Musk and others to spend a lot of money to avoid another loss.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
President Donald Trump on Monday declared a vast list of pardons issued by Joe Biden on his way out the door of the White House to be "VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT."
It is because those pardons, to a long list of his own family members, prominently including son Hunter Biden who was convicted of gun charge felonies and pleaded guilty to a list of tax charges and was facing possible prison time, were "done by Autopen."
On the social media site Truth Social, Trump confirmed:
The "Pardons" that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because of the fact that they were done by Autopen. In other words, Joe Biden did not sign them but, more importantly, he did not know anything about them! The necessary Pardoning Documents were not explained to, or approved by, Biden. He knew nothing about them, and the people that did may have committed a crime. Therefore, those on the Unselect Committee, who destroyed and deleted ALL evidence obtained during their two year Witch Hunt of me, and many other innocent people, should fully understand that they are subject to investigation at the highest level. The fact is, they were probably responsible for the Documents that were signed on their behalf without the knowledge or consent of the Worst President in the History of our Country, Crooked Joe Biden!"
WND had reported only hours earlier how Trump brought attention again to the allegations that some of Biden's orders and pardons might not be worth anything due to his cognitive decline.
He then posted on Truth Social images of the most recent commanders in chief, with Biden's official portrait displaying an autopen signature device.
Trump had voiced his concerns during a speech at the U.S. Justice Department headquarters in Washington on Friday, Trump said:
"Crooked Joe Biden got us into a real mess with Russia and everything else he did, frankly, but he didn't know about it, and he, generally speaking, signed it with autopen. So how would he know? …
"Who's doing this? When my people come up … [and say], 'Sir, this is an executive order.' They explain it to me. And 90% of the time I sign it and 99% of the time, I say, 'Do it,' but they come up and I sign it, but you don't use autopen."
"No. 1, it's disrespectful to the office. No. 2, maybe it's not even valid, because, you know, who's getting him to sign? He had no idea what the hell he was doing. If he did, all of these bad things wouldn't be happening.
A Heritage Oversight Project report called into question the validity of Biden's actions, finding the vast majority of documents signed by Biden used the mechanical device, including the last-minute pardons of Biden family members, Gen. Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and the members of the Jan. 6 Committee.
"We gathered every document we could find with Biden's signature over the course of his presidency," reads a Heritage Oversight post on X.
"All used the same autopen signature except for the announcement that the former president was dropping out of the race last year."
The controversy has led Republican Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey to urge Attorney General Pam Bondi to probe the matter.
"I am demanding the DOJ investigate whether President Biden's cognitive decline allowed unelected staff to push through radical policy without his knowing approval," Bailey said.
Trump's daughter-in-law Lara Trump, the former co-chair of the Republican National Committee and current Fox News host, told journalist Benny Johnson that Biden's entire presidency was orchestrated, and that he wasn't aware of anything he was signing.
"It's all been fake," Lara Trump said. "The signatures were fake. The hype around Kamala Harris was fake. Joe Biden being OK, fake. His Oval Office, [Trump counsel] Alina Habba the other day, exposed … remember the set that we used to see him on? It's fake!"
"It's just all been orchestrated and planned. And we as Americans honestly are lucky that nothing worse happened to this country over the past four years. Who the hell was in charge? I don't know. That is terrifying to know they're just using autopens. Literally, Benny, anyone could have signed anything for Joe Biden."
"This is why nobody wants to be a part of this party, 'cause it's all phony, it's all smoke and mirrors, it's all fake. And people want authenticity. They can smell phony from a mile away."
She also brought up House Speaker Mike Johnson's recent revelation that Biden himself had no idea he had paused LNG exports to Europe.
In January, Johnson called Biden's ignorance of the matter the "scariest thing I've ever seen."
"It occurred to me he was not lying to me," Johnson noted. "He genuinely did not know what he had signed. I walked outta that meeting with fear and loathing because I thought, 'We are in serious trouble.'"
Meanwhile, the New York Post reports: "A key aide to former President Joe Biden may have exceeded their authority by liberally using an autopen to sign official documents, according to two former White House sources, as President Trump's aides set up 'far more restrictive' rules governing the use of the mechanical device."
The Biden aide, who did not respond to requests for comment, would frequently make mention of what "the boss" wanted, the source said, but compatriots would have "no idea" if it was true because the internal culture was to not ask questions.
"I feared no one as much as I feared that [staffer]. To me, [the staffer] basically was the president," the person said. "No one ever questioned [the staffer]. Period."
"Everyone" was suspicious of this individual exceeding their authority when claiming to speak for the president, the source said. "But no one would actually say it."
"I think [the aide] was using the autopen as standard and past protocol," The Post's informant said.
"There is no clarity on who actually approved what – POTUS or [the aide]."
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
A state lawmaker in Maine who expressed her opinion regarding a male student portraying himself as a girl and winning a girls' pole vault state championship, and was censured by leftists in the legislature for doing that, already has sued for that infringement of her constitutional rights.
It is state Rep. Laurel Libby, R-Auburn, who posted on Facebook about the issue of transgenderism in public schools and, as a result, was censured by the state House, on a 75-70 vote that deprived her of her right to speak in the legislature, even vote.
Her posting simply included photos of the male athlete from both a boys competition a couple years ago and the girls competition this year.
Her legal action is against Maine Speaker of the House Ryan Fecteau, a Democrat, for the First Amendment speech violations as well as equal protection violations and the guarantee clause of Article IV of the Constitution, which protects the basic rights of political participation within state governments.
"I have the constitutional right to speak out, and my constituents have the right to full representation in the Maine House," Libby said in a statement shared with The Daily Signal. "Biological males have no place in girls sports. Our girls have every right, under federal law, to fair competition in sports. We will not let them be erased by the Democrat majority advancing a woke progressive agenda."
Now a report in the Federalist has revealed the judge likely to hear the case is a radical leftist activist.
All of the judges in Maine excused themselves from the case as apparently one of the male athlete's parents is a court employee, leaving Judge Melissa R. DuBose of Rhode Island the next in line to hear the case.
She is described in the report as "a far-left activist on LGBT and race issues and has spoken publicly about her ardent support — something well outside the norm for federal judges."
Libby, a Republican, has refused Democrat demands that she apologize for her opinions, even as the state policy that lets males say they are female and compete against girls is under federal investigation for apparent violations of civil rights law.
Libby said when the case was filed, "Instead of having an open and honest debate about the devastating impacts of Maine girls being forced to compete against biological males, Speaker Fecteau , and his Democratic colleagues resorted to canceling and silencing me, Speaker Fecteau and the Democrat majority are risking hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding for our schools by stubbornly refusing to address this injustice. I have the constitutional right to speak out and my constituents have the right to full representation in the Maine House. Biological males have no place in girls' sports. Our girls have every right, under federal law, to fair competition in sports. We will not let them be erased by the Democrat majority advancing a woke progressive agenda."
Judicial Crisis Network president Carrie Severino told The Federalist that DuBose "is a true radical."
"There's questions asked about whether she is capable of being impartial, and then, even if she ends up continuing to hear the case — I think it's important context as we're watching this case go through the court to realize this is — this is likely a judge that's going to already have a thumb on the scale on one side of this issue."
Democrats boasted when DuBose was nominated by Joe Biden that DuBose apparently was the "first openly LGBT judge" in the Rhode Island district.
It is her activism that is raising questions.
She signed a 2021 letter that appeared aimed at bringing a wholesale discrimination narrative into the judiciary, the report said.
This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
PALM BEACH, Florida – Members of President Donald Trump's Cabinet are firing back defiantly against a federal judge's order to block deportation of dangerous Venezuelans who are members of the notorious Tren de Aragua gang.
D.C. District Judge James Boasberg, an Obama appointee, ordered Saturday an immediate stop to deportation flights for TDA members, and even demanded planes already in flight turn around and return the violent criminals back to America.
"Any plane containing these folks that is going to take off or is in the air needs to be returned to the United States however that is accomplished," Boasberg said, according to Politico.
"Make sure it's complied with immediately."
Despite the ruling, officials in the Trump administration refused to comply.
On Sunday morning, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio explained: "We have sent 2 dangerous top MS-13 leaders plus 21 of its most wanted back to face justice in El Salvador.
"Also, as promised by @POTUS, we sent over 250 alien enemy members of Tren de Aragua which El Salvador has agreed to hold in their very good jails at a fair price that will also save our taxpayer dollars.
"President @nayibbukele is not only the strongest security leader in our region, he's also a great friend of the U.S. Thank you!"
Saturday night, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi posted a statement indicating: "Tonight, a D.C. trial judge supported Tren de Aragua terrorists over the safety of Americans.
"TdA is represented by the ACLU. This order disregards well-established authority regarding President Trump's power, and it puts the public and law enforcement at risk.
"The Department of Justice is undeterred in its efforts to work with the White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and all of our partners to stop this invasion and Make America Safe Again."
El Salvador is apparently thrilled to have the criminals being deported back to its country, as President Nayib Bukele posted a video of their ignominious return, saying: :Today, the first 238 members of the Venezuelan criminal organization, Tren de Aragua, arrived in our country. They were immediately transferred to CECOT, the Terrorism Confinement Center, for a period of one year (renewable).
"The United States will pay a very low fee for them, but a high one for us.
WATCH:
"Over time, these actions, combined with the production already being generated by more than 40,000 inmates engaged in various workshops and labor under the Zero Idleness program, will help make our prison system self-sustainable. As of today, it costs $200 million per year.
"On this occasion, the U.S. has also sent us 23 MS-13 members wanted by Salvadoran justice, including two ringleaders. One of them is a member of the criminal organization's highest structure.
"This will help us finalize intelligence gathering and go after the last remnants of MS-13, including its former and new members, money, weapons, drugs, hideouts, collaborators, and sponsors.
"As always, we continue advancing in the fight against organized crime. But this time, we are also helping our allies, making our prison system self-sustainable, and obtaining vital intelligence to make our country an even safer place. All in a single action.
Trump reposted the deportation video Sunday afternoon, and said: "These are the monsters sent into our Country by Crooked Joe Biden and the Radical Left Democrats. How dare they!
"Thank you to El Salvador and, in particular, President Bukele, for your understanding of this horrible situation, which was allowed to happen to the United States because of incompetent Democrat leadership. We will not forget!"
In his declaration Saturday relying on the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, Trump said: "I find and declare that TdA is perpetrating, attempting, and threatening an invasion or predatory incursion against the territory of the United States."
The judge's temporary restraining order expires in 14 days, which Boasberg indicated would be sufficient time to litigate the legality of Trump's declaration.
A Florida homeowner has emerged victorious in a legal battle over displaying pro-Trump banners on his property, culminating in a landmark ruling on March 5, 2025, in his favor.
Marvin Peavy successfully argued that the fines imposed by Walton County for his banners infringed on his First Amendment rights, leading a circuit court judge to mandate that the county pay his legal fees and accrued fines, Breitbart reported.
In recent years, Marvin Peavy of Walton County, Florida, asserted his political beliefs by adorning his home on County Road 30A with large banners supporting former President Donald Trump.
Officials in Walton County received a complaint regarding Peavy's banners, which they alleged were in violation of the scenic corridor code. The county code permits political displays during election years, yet fines are levied if such displays remain just two weeks following the conclusion of the election period. Due to Peavy's refusal to comply with the takedown request, the county began imposing daily fines.
Peavy's noncompliance with the county’s order resulted in the accumulation of substantial penalties. By the end of 2024, the fines had soared to $63,000.
Nevertheless, Peavy remained resolute in his stance against what he perceived as a suppression of his constitutional rights. Complaints about the legality and procedural logistics of Walton County's ordinance motivated Peavy and his legal team to mount a robust defense.
With the support of his legal representation, Peavy took his case to court, challenging the enforcement of the scenic corridor code on the grounds of free speech infringement. “Their laws cannot supersede my First Amendment right, so they came after my constitutional rights, which they cannot do,” Peavy remarked, emphasizing his dedication to the constitutional discourse.
Judge Jeffrey Lewis presided over the case and ultimately delivered a decisive ruling in favor of Peavy. On March 5, 2025, the Circuit Court ruled that Walton County had overreached in its attempt to penalize Peavy, determining that the fines and prospective liens against his home were unlawful. This ruling underscored the importance of protecting individual rights to free expression, even in the face of local legislative frameworks.
As part of the court’s decision, Walton County was instructed to compensate Peavy for his legal expenses and reimburse the imposed penalties, totalling $42,000. This financial restitution was ordered to be completed within a ten-day timeframe, marking a profound victory for the Florida resident.
Peavy expressed satisfaction with the court's decision. “I’m very happy that they came after me and I woke up,” Peavy said, highlighting the revitalization of his patriotism and his appreciation for his legal advisors. The court ruling reiterated a concern for safeguarding individuals' rights to political expression on private property.
The case has sparked significant public interest, drawing attention to the balancing act between local ordinances and constitutional rights. Peavy’s assertion that “the U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that you can have signs on your home” reflects a broader understanding of constitutional protections as they pertain to personal property and speech.
Walton County’s leadership is now tasked with reassessing the scenic corridor code to ensure it aligns with constitutional mandates. The ruling may act as a catalyst for other regions to scrutinize their local codes, weighing them against federally protected rights.
As the dust settles, the broader implications of Peavy's victory may serve as a touchstone for ongoing debates around the intersection of personal expression and local regulation. These discussions underscore the enduring relevance of the First Amendment within varying legislative contexts.
Peavy’s lawsuit highlights the intricacies of navigating local and federal laws, paving the way for future dialogues around the enforcement of scenic codes and residents' freedom of speech. Ultimately, the case reinforces the protection of individual rights amidst regulatory attempts, marking a crucial juncture in legal interpretation.
A federal judge has issued a temporary block on President Donald Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to speed up the deportation of violent illegal immigrants.
The temporary block issued by U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg required flights already carrying out deportations to be halted and any flights en route to be turned around.
The Alien Enemies Act has only been used three times in U.S. history, with the last use during World War II to detain individuals from enemy nations.
Trump's opponents are using that factor to argue that his use of the Alien Enemies Act is illegitimate because it's being used to detain and deport citizens from nations that aren't technically engaged in war with the United States.
Of course, that interpretation is based entirely on the last use of the Alien Enemies Act during World War II. There is no doubt that foreign citizens who are a clear and present danger to the public would fall under "Alien Enemies."
Trump was given a mandate by the American people to aggressively deport both violent and non-violent illegal immigrants who came in by the million under former President Joe Biden.
However, at every turn, Trump's deportation agenda has run into obstacles from an activist judiciary that is doing everything to stop Trump's agenda regardless of legality.
In an executive order invoking the Alien Enemies Act, Trump stated, "Over the years, Venezuelan national and local authorities have ceded ever-greater control over their territories to transnational criminal organizations, including TdA. The result is a hybrid criminal state that is perpetrating an invasion of and predatory incursion into the United States, and which poses a substantial danger."
While the United States may not be at war with Venezuela, a country ruled by a socialist dictator, the United States is definitely at war with the terrorist organization that holds substantial territory within Venezuela.
Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign pointed this out in arguing that Trump had the authority to determine threats to national security and act under the 1798 law.
However, thanks to this injunction from Judge Boasberg, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, the Trump administration will likely have to fight all the way to the Supreme Court before the deportation of violent and dangerous illegal immigrants can resume.
The threat to the nation posed by Central and South American gangs cannot be understated. Members of violent organizations like TdA and MS-13 often commit violent acts as rites of initiation including murder, rape, and torture.
Judge Boasberg made the insulting claim in his injunction that "A brief delay in their removal does not cause the government any harm," which ignores the very real harm that violent criminals inflict on citizens and American society at large.
Nursing student Laken Riley would strongly disagree with Judge Boasberg's claim if she were still alive. Unfortunately, Riley was brutally murdered by illegal immigrant Jose Ibarra, who is a member of TdA.
These monstrous criminals must be deported immediately, and activist judges like James Boasberg must be held accountable for endangering Americans by allowing these illegal immigrants to remain in the United States.