A former Bill Clinton victim has seen all she can take from Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
After hearing that Feinstein (D-CA) demanded justice for Kavanaugh’s accusers, Juanita Broaddrick called out the senator for dismissing her testimony about Bill Clinton, calling her an outright “hypocrite.”
Trip Back in Time
In 1999, the country was stunned to find out Bill Clinton was being accused of rape.
Unlike the allegations against Supreme Court hopefully Brett Kavanaugh, though, Broaddrick’s story was extremely credible.
Feinstein, however, really had no interest in hearing what Broaddrick had to say at the time.
Feinstein: We’re Better than this.
Me: NO YOU’RE NOT- now or back in 1999 when you @SenFeinstein refused to read my deposition for the independent counsel, along with ALL Democrats. Your vote had already been decided before testimony. SHAME ON YOU. https://t.co/hutyYkuIsg— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) September 21, 2018
I had first hand knowledge, along with 5 witnesses – 8 YEARS later in 1999. YOU @SenFeinstein refused to read the evidence in my record. You are such a hypocrite! https://t.co/RoqIvaOLEg
— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) September 21, 2018
But of course, the person being accused in 1999 was a Democrat. Interesting.
Fast Forward
Today, Feinstein claims to be one of the biggest advocates for women who have been assaulted.
But the person she is standing up for has accused is a conservative judge up for a SCOTUS appointment — not a Democrat.
Unlike Broadddrick’s story, there are no witnesses and no corroborating testimonies in support of Kavanaugh’s accuser.
The alleged victim, Christine Blasey Ford, has even named several people as witnesses who later said that they could recall no such event occurring.
Kavanaugh’s second accuser, Deborah Ramirez, is even worse.
Ramirez herself cannot recall the details of the incident, and one of her best friends at that time even said she is likely making up the story.
When you look at the case against Kavanaugh and compare it to the accusations against Clinton, it is night and day.
Broaddrick has amazing clarity, recalling every detail of what happened to her that day.
In both cases against Kavanaugh, the women can barely remember the incident, let alone any fine details that would lend credibility to their stories.
[show_poll poll_id=4557]
Yet, Feinstein is giving both of them the benefit of the doubt and ready to ruin Kavanaugh’s life over it.
It sure would have been nice if Democrats supported any of the women that said Clinton attacked them the way they are supporting Ford and Ramirez.
