This story was originally published by the WND News Center.
The legacy media in America long has been active in full partisan support of the Joe Biden administration and agenda.
Just look at how that damaging information about the Biden family's "influence peddling" operations was suppressed just before the 2020 election, an election interference strategy that almost certainly handed the White House to the Democrat.
But now infighting has broken out, with the Biden camp accusing reporters of misreporting Robert Hur's comments about Biden and the reporters firing back.
Such divisions bode ill for the coalition that put Biden in the White House following the 2024 election.
It is in a report at Fox News that the feud is documented.
It explains that the White House Correspondents Association formally blasted White House Counsel spokesman Ian Sams, who had complained about their "misreporting."
At issue is the documentation from Robert Hur, a special counsel told to review Joe Biden's willful decision to take and keep classified government documents, and later store them in unsecured locations like a private office, his home, even in a broken box in an unsecured garage.
Hur found evidence of offenses but recommended no charges because of Biden's "diminished" capacity. He cited Biden's inability to remember when he was vice president.
Hur, in fact, described Biden as a "sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory," a move that left the White House, well, infuriated.
Sams then lashed out at the WHCA, writing association President Kelly O'Donnell that they have "reported striking inaccuracies" and accusing them of misleading the public.
He said reporters' questions also have been based on "false content or are based on false premises."
The White House charged that reporters were making "significant errors" in coverage, including "misstating the findings and conclusions."
And Sams made his condemnation public, posting it on social media.
O'Donnell's response, then, was to explain that Sams' letter as "misdirected."
That letter charged, "It is inappropriate for the White House to utilize internal pool distribution channels, primarily for logistics and the rapid sharing of need-to-know information, to disseminate generalized critiques of news coverage. We will not distribute them going forward.
"As a non-profit organization that advocates for its members in their efforts to cover the presidency, the WHCA does not, cannot and will not serve as a repository for the government’s views of what’s in the news. The White House has far reach to make its positions known on the Hur report or any other matter."
