Joe Biden has seven grandkids.
Yet, in staff meetings, Biden's aides are "being lied to in strategy meetings in an apparent attempt to cover up the president’s seventh grandchild, an illegitimate child fathered by the president’s son, Hunter."
Joe Biden is trying to get ready for a reelection campaign.
He's already in his eighties and can't speak clearly, so he's already got an uphill battle ahead of him.
With all that going on, Joe Biden doesn't need to worry about silly little things like being honest about how many grandchildren he has.
At least that's the opinion of the Biden family.
The rest of America has known that these are NOT family men for quite some time. It's been obvious since Hunter Biden started fighting in court for the ability to disown his own daughter.
Disgustingly, Hunter Biden was recently successful in banning his own daughter from using his own name.
Despite that being the only way that Hunter has ever made money for himself in his entire career, he will NOT allow his daughter, Navy Joan Roberts, to use the Biden last name.
Why?
Because Hunter fathered her out-of-wedlock with a stripper.
But just because Hunter doesn't want to admit that his illegitimate child exists, doesn't mean that America doesn't know about Navy Joan Roberts.
Hunter may be a deadbeat, yes, but he's still the president's son. That means that America has been quite aware of whatever they've gotten up to.
That means that America knows that Joe Biden is lying when he continuously claims to only have six grandchildren.
He has seven. Hunter knows he has seven. Joe knows he has seven. Jill knows he has seven.
Yet none of them seem willing to admit it.
This is shaping up to be a MAJOR problem for Joe Biden's reelection bid, as part of Joe Biden's public image for so long has been that of a wise father.
Now, we're learning that Joe Biden has NEVER been able to lead his own family.
It's just unfortunate that we had to watch Joe Biden being unable to lead our country before other Democrats were willing to admit that.
RFK Jr. wants to know what the White House is hiding.
If they weren't trying to hide anything, then why did they wait until the absolute last minute to release their documents on the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy?
The White House tried the old Friday news dump trick recently, not telling America that it had made 99% of the documents in the John F. Kennedy assassination case public until the last moment before the weekend, when all of the most prominent reporters have already knocked off and are about to be enjoying their weekend.
Usually, organizations will do this with news that they want swept under the rug.
That way, the news cycle has the entire weekend to forget about what's happened, with the goal being to get away with whatever they had announced at the last moment on Friday. By doing this, they're always able to fall back on the fact that TECHNICALLY they made information publicly available, even though they KNEW nobody was going to see it.
RFK Jr. wants to know what the White House was trying to hide after what he called a "midnight announcement."
It’s not about conspiracy – it is about transparency. In a midnight Friday night announcement the White House has delivered the bad news that President Biden will be maintaining secrecy indefinitely on some JFK assassination related records.
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) July 2, 2023
The White House tried to use some legal mumbo jumbo to explain why they couldn't release the information until the last possible moment, but let's be reasonable here. The assassination was SIXTY years ago.
There's literally zero chance that it's still any sort of security threat to tell the truth about what happened.
Still, the White House told us that they couldn't:
"In light of the recommendation for continued postponement of public release of information in the records identified in section 2(b) of this memorandum under the statutory standard, I hereby certify, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 5(g)(2)(D) of the Act, that continued postponement of public disclosure of that information is necessary to protect against identifiable harms to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, and the conduct of foreign relations that are of such gravity that they outweigh the public interest in disclosure."
RFK wasn't buying it.
The assassination was 60 years ago. What national security secrets could possibly be at risk? What are they hiding?
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) July 2, 2023
He knew America wasn't either.
Public trust in government is at an all-time low. Releasing these records would be a small but significant step toward regaining that trust. #Kennedy24
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) July 2, 2023
Joe Biden's Department of Justice is as crooked as the day is long, and here's the proof.
According to The Independent, Joe Biden's Department of Justice plans to add a “superseding indictment” of 30-45 more charges to the existing 37 charges of the indictment if Trump-appointed Judge Eileen Cannon remains the assigned judge on the case.
Biden's crew is saying that they're going to do the political version of taking their ball and going home if they don't get exactly what they want--a liberal judge to hear Trump's case.
According to them, Judge Aileen Cannon cannot be trusted because she was appointed by former President Donald Trump himself.
Weird that they didn't have a problem with the judge in Trump's Manhattan case having donated to liberal presidential candidates, but that's just an average liberal double standard for you.
Trump is currently facing a federal indictment comprised of 37 counts filed by special counsel Jack Smith. A whopping 31 of these counts have to do with "the alleged willful retention of military documents, with the prosecution invoking the Espionage Act of 1917."
While Trump may face over 80 criminal charges, the same DOJ prosecuting him is slow-walking and obstructing the investigation into corruption by President Joe Biden.
It probably doesn't matter how many charges Donald is facing, his defense is likely going to be the same.
Donald's team is saying "that the possession of these documents was lawful under the civil statute of the Presidential Records Act."
Trump's best example of this is the "Clinton socks case" that was decided approximately ten years ago by an Obama-appointed judge.
Bill Clinton was on trial in that case. He admitted to taking sensitive documents from the White House and stashing them in his sock drawer.
Trump's argument is that if Bill Clinton was let off by a liberal judge, why shouldn't he get to be tried by a conservative judge?
Taking the issue a step further, Trump has claimed that the "Clinton sock case" should be enough to prove his innocence without even having to go to court.
While that might be logical to Trump and other Republicans, we aren't talking about a logical enemy here. We're talking about America's power-hungry liberals.