Hold onto your hats, folks—Washington’s latest scandal might just make your head spin with questions about who’s really been running the show.
According to Breitbart, the House Oversight Committee dropped a bombshell report on Tuesday, alleging that several executive actions under President Joe Biden’s administration, including pardons and commutations, were signed with an autopen without his direct approval, rendering them potentially invalid.
This isn’t just a paperwork glitch; it’s a serious accusation of bypassing presidential authority. The Committee’s findings suggest Biden’s aides may have used a mechanical device to replicate his signature on critical documents. And if true, that’s not just a shortcut—it’s a constitutional crisis waiting to happen.
On Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee didn’t hold back, urging the Department of Justice to dig deep into executive actions from Biden’s tenure. They claim evidence points to decisions made without the president’s personal sign-off. It’s the kind of revelation that makes you wonder how much oversight there really is in the Oval Office.
The report specifically calls out the use of an autopen—a machine that mimics signatures—for actions like clemency orders. According to the Committee, these moves are void if not directly authorized by Biden himself. That’s a polite way of saying someone might have played fast and loose with the highest office’s power.
Diving into the 91-page document, the Committee paints a troubling picture of Biden’s mental and physical state during his presidency. They allege senior White House staff worked overtime to hide any decline from the public eye. It’s a claim that, if substantiated, raises ethical questions about transparency at the top.
The report doesn’t just stop at signatures—it accuses aides of colluding to maintain an illusion of presidential control while Biden’s capacity allegedly waned. This isn’t just about a pen; it’s about whether the American people were misled. And that’s a bitter pill for anyone who values honesty in governance.
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer didn’t mince words in his assessment of the situation. “The Biden Autopen Presidency will go down as one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history,” Comer said in a written statement. If that doesn’t make you sit up and take notice, what will?
Comer’s statement goes further, alleging a deliberate deception by Biden’s inner circle. “Our report reveals how key aides colluded to mislead the public and the extraordinary measures they took to sustain the appearance of presidential authority as Biden’s capacity to function independently diminished,” he added. That’s a zinger that lands hard, pointing fingers at a systemic failure rather than just a technicality.
The Committee’s recommendations are as sharp as they come, pushing for the Department of Justice to scrutinize every executive action taken under Biden’s name. They’re not just asking for a peek—they want a full-blown review. It’s a demand for accountability that resonates with anyone frustrated by bureaucratic overreach.
Chairman Comer also pointed the spotlight at specific aides, including Dr. Kevin O’Connor, Annie Tomasini, and Anthony Bernal, for invoking the Fifth Amendment during inquiries. He’s called for the DOJ to take a closer look at their roles. If silence is golden, it’s also awfully suspicious in this context.
Adding another layer, Comer urged the D.C. Board of Medicine to examine Dr. O’Connor’s conduct as Biden’s personal physician. The implication here is clear: was the president’s health status hidden to prop up a faltering administration? That’s a question that cuts to the core of public trust.
The report labels many executive actions, especially clemency decisions, as “illegitimate” due to the autopen’s use. If the DOJ agrees, we could see a cascade of reversals that rewrite parts of Biden’s record. It’s a potential unraveling that would shake up an already polarized political landscape.
For conservatives, this saga is a glaring example of why unchecked power and progressive overreach need reining in. Yet, it’s worth noting that any resolution must prioritize fairness and due process over political point-scoring. After all, the goal here is restoring faith in our institutions, not just settling grudges.
So, where does this leave us? The House Oversight Committee has thrown down the gauntlet, and now it’s up to the DOJ and other bodies to pick it up. One thing’s for sure—this autopen affair is a reminder that in Washington, even a signature can signpost a scandal.
